DOCSLIB.ORG

Central Equatoria State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Central Equatoria State ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Central! Equatoria State! Map ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 30°E ! 31°E ! ! 32°E ! ! ! Ngwer ! Korikori Ngop Fagiel Wulu ! ! Paker ! Gumro Lual ! Unagok Alel ! ! ! Ashandit Kulu ! ! !Chundit Makuac Bor ! Atiit Bunagok Yirol West ! ! Deng Shol Pengko Eassi Dekada Jerweng ! ! ! ! ! ! Br!ong Anyidi Wulu Pul Anyuol! ! ! Macdit Anuol Rokon e R ! ! l i Minikolome . ! S Kwal Tiu R N ! . R Malangya ! Khalil ! u ! e p Wurrie!r o ! Latolot t Tukls h Aw!erial i i ! Kondoagoi Lake Nyiropo r ! l " h ! Lakes i ! ! Anyat ! Awan ! Wako ! ! ! ! Nyiel ( Bahr El Girin Awerial W B Bor South ! Pwora b a Jonglei Mvolo ! a Dor h " li ! Minkamman! r R ! -A l ! Aliab Aliab e . Guar e ! l ! Dogoba Kila ! - ! Y G ! . J N e e N !Dorri R ° ° i ! Malek b Ambo 6 6 ! ( Golo e ! Bengeya ! Dijeyr ! R ! !l ! ! ) Gira Domeri o Melekwich Wun Thou ! ! d ! Wun Chwei ! i ) Panabang Mangi ! W ! Jabor ! Mvolo Tal!i ! Melwel Latuk ! " h ! i Koalikiri r t Lesi e ! a !Bari Dakada N ! ! Awiri w Wasi Verlinga!i ! i G l Tellang e ! . ! Banwar Dari ! R Ndia Azai ! Jakari Tombi ! Mulinda ! Mirda ! Duboro Yeri Delinoi ! Mandari ! ! ! ! ! Gwojo-Adung Teri Tur ! Azai ! ! Kulundulu ! Kasiko Gaya ! ! ! ! Tiarki! G!utetian ! Bori ! Mejiki Kulwo ! ! Maralinn Jarrah Bogora Gigging Bogori ! Vora ! ! ! ! Muni Gemmaiza Lakamadi !) " ! ! Tindalo o Terekeka ! ol (G Poko Gabir p ! Bokuna ! ! Duwwo a Gobo Wani Mika! Gulu Rushi ! P ! Pagar ! ! . Tukara ! Bitti R ! Abdulla Mbara ! ! Lamindo Pom Magiri ! ! e ! l Lopore Wala i Gali Kederu N ! l Kpakpawiya ! Kediba ! ! ! ! h Amadi Bulu Koli e ! " ! t o Ire Wandi i ! ! h R . W Doso ! Wito R Riku ! ! Rego Logono ! ! Terekeka ! Kemand!e " Mariba Gabir ! ! ! Wit ! !Movo Magara ! ! Minga ! ! Juban Rambo Gullu Western Equatoria Amardi ! ! ! ! ! ! Gabat R " " Badigeru Swamp ! Lui ! . Wiro Mundri ! R River Meri ri o o L h . l Mundri East R ! Bala Pool Kotobi Lanyi ! Lopa ! ! ! ! Yalo Mangalla Mundri West R " Buko . Madi ! ! T ! Buaji Naramoa ! a ! p Karika Land!igwa Rokon Tijor ! Gunba Laporu a " ! r e ! l Mulai i i ! Kalala ! N Bahr Olo ! Nidri Wulikare ! ! Bunduqiyah ! e t Bundukki Jambo i ! ! ! ! h ! Luala W Gariya ! ! e ! l Miden i N ! N !El Iqlim Al Istiwa'i ! ° N ° R ! 5 Kporolo . 5 ! e U t g i Gori ! ur h ro i ! ! er River Nyigera Zesi M W ! Maridi . ! Gondokoro Gamichi R Lokoya ! Mogiri ! Gworolorongo River Luri ! ! ri ! Diko u ! L ! River Wanga . ! Mambe Rigl Bibi R ! ! ri !^ Wuneba! Bangolo a ! p a ! Kamarok T Mandubulu Lologo . ! Kimangoro ! R ! ! ! ! Jeraputa Buripiong ! ! Tappi ! ! Glaud Rapids Mendopolo Rija Central Equatoria ! ! ! ! Rejaf Marata Lokotak ! Ngangala ! Juba R ! ! o R . r r Njada Papua L ! ! ! . ! Naam e u Lowoi Luli Bungu K i ! ! ! Toboya ! f g ! Dorolili ! Tore Wandi ! o ! Sheikh Bringi ! i r Liria ! ! t o U Wandi Rapids Mankole ! " ! ! . Kolier Lefureur (L ! Koturomi Nyake Angabi ! ! ! R ! ! e R . ! Kuju f ! Mangara u ! Irido R ! ! Gopur Teteramon r Rasolo Garmabe Qarambi J!igokwe ! e ! I!tchire o ! Kungu ! ! Wawa ! u Fidiya h ! Baranga ! ! Lukala ! l ! r) Fadl El Mula ! ! Digali ! ! Kalipapa Peki Baka Tukudungw! en ! ! Kuba ! Fedde River Ongedon ! ! ! ! R Lokiliri ! Rigl Aua ! ! Mukpara ! Marabi Koli . ! Lagogolo Yaffa L Rombari ! ! ! e Garmabe Shitata ! Monji i ! R Ueli Kukudu ! f ! ! Duduru! o Okaru ! ! . Ganzi ro ! Marawa B Tapuri ! ! ! ( i i Kuiaji L . Tor b ! ! R i M! afi Sindiru e ! ! fu Bongwa Kamuri r Kundru ! ! Duro e ! ! Pego ! Torit Lukupir!i u !Bereka r ! ) ! Loragwe Adio ! Loszek ! ! ! Shamba ! ! Lopi Egwi Lokorupo ! ! Girn ! ! ! K!inda Mari ! ! ! Muturu !Lainya Lorumba! Maradu ! ! ! ! ! ! Odio Soka ! ! Makaia ! Gado ! Niarakuj ! Lobonok River Manya Goli Ro!ue Niaporo! ! ! Mongwa! ! Lagora ! L! a!yo ! Avokoia Marakan Lainya ! ! ! Kadili ! Kili ! ! Koropa ! Yei ! Luga ! ! Kit !Araka ! ! ! ! Omit Biri !Loka West ! ! Nyigo ! ! ! ! ! ! Lopangwe ! Goli !! Kijo ! ! Lokobo Koya ! Keki ! Mngali ! ! Ramili Ameda ! ! Dimu 2 ! ! ! ! ! !Tukala Nyako!l ! Buri Malewo Lu!ri Keni ! Samba Kainye Fagar R ! ! Iindi !! ! ! ! . Mapoko ! ! ! Rume Wontambi A ! y ! Sadim i ! Sajo ! Limbe ! ! ! Pisa ! ! Kembe ! ! Bari Gado ! ! ! Lim ! ! Abara ! Wapu Minori Moga ! ! Ameh ! ! ! R ! Logo Kaluli ! Labizuzo ! Penda ! ! " ! Terubi ! ! . Karpeto ! ! ! ! Pakire ! Chilikwa ! K ! ! ! ! Gimunu ! ! Kopera ! ! Korkimo Ye!i !Limuro a ! Kogwo M! arani Loga Fajelu " ! ! i ! a Afoyi ! ! ! Rony ! ! Ribi ! Ame ! ! ! ! ! Arado Kagelu! ! Mundu! Mundo ! ! Madi Pakula !! ! ! ! Kalo Wuji ! ! ! ! Tambura ! ! ! Ro! ny!i Jamara ! ! Abegi Alero ! Dongoro Gob!er ! !Goja ! Dukunya N ! ! !! N ° Piowa Ariga Eastern Equatoria ° Paer ! ! ! 4 Rubeki 4 ! Lu ! Walrakitter Kala ! ! ! ! Karokobe! River Liro Goya Iamba Larding ! ! Mede ! ! Gwaja ! ! Gaderu Kuio ! !!Lasu ! Morsak ! Kuriju ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Payawa ! ! ! Warcha Danga Libago!New Lasu ! ! ! Kobwa Yaribe ! Yaribe Lire ! Konugi ! ! Marjo Kemi Lakitala ! Opari ! ! ! ! ! ! Adala Monga! Kansuk Gaderu ! Shukoli Kerepi Gokiri ! Ribuga ! ! ! ! ! ! Limb! i Kwotio! Kakorodo ! ! ! Ombasi ! ! Lilige ! Litoba Magwi Tekakomi!Atepi ! Yari ! ! ! Kajo-Keji W ! ! Kolowa Kajo-K! eji ! ! ! ! Mekr !" ! h ! Sosodi Laropi Lui Lujula ! it Goj!a Bala ! Mondi ! e Pageri Adusha Laiba Yari ! Nyigo Kenyiba " ! ! ! !! ! N Kejiko ! ! ! Ajio ! Keriti ! Mesika ! Loguduba ! ! ! Ulako ! il ! e Liggi Mangalotore ! ! Loa ! Odulubo ! ! Jumbo ! Logu ! Loloreji u ! ! Kuduri Bori ! ! Livolo ! y ! ! Panyumae ! B!uri a i Wudabi Kanza ! ! pp !! Pogu ! Mejali ! K e DEMOCRATIC ! Kinyiba R . ! t ! Kanga ! Mijare ! A ! ! Panyume East ! R . Awe ! Kendila . R ! ! K ! ! Go!do Gulumbi a Morobo ! Jolimo Pomoju A!swa REPUBLIC ! ! ! y ! a ! ! ! Langba ! u Eyibe . Assu ! River Karua R ! ! Aribo Bu!r!i Nyei Morobo ! Liego ! ! Bamurye Jalei OF CONGO ! ! ! ! Apalla ! Ripi ! ! ! ! Boara Nimule National Park Gelle Eseb!i R ! ! Panyana Yondu . Rodoba ! N ! Marobo y Nimule ! a ! ! Kimba Dudulabe w lbert " ! Olupi ! UGANDA a R. A Kaya a ! u s s U A n . y R a m a Code: SS-0021 Date: 27/03/12 IMU OCHA SS µ Sudan Legend 0 12.5 25 50 75 Kilometers ! State Capitals Main Rivers " Principal Towns Lakes/Marshland South Data Sources: National and State boundaries based on Russian Sudan Map Series, 1:200k, Ethiopia " Secondary Towns 1970-ties. County Administrative Units digitized based on Statistical Yearbook 2009, National Central Sudan County Boundaries African Bureau of Statistics (NBS), formerly the Southern Sudan Commission for Census, Statistics Republic ! Administrative Centres and Evaluation - SSCCSE. State Boundaries Disclaimer: ! Villages/Settlements The information shown on this map does not imply official recognition or endorsement of any physical, political boundaries or feature names by the United Nations or other collaborative organizations. UN OCHA N Democratic Uganda N ° and affiliated organizations are not liable for damages of any kind related to the use of this data. ° 3 Republic of Congo 3 Main Road Network International Boundaries Users noting errors or omissions are encouraged to contact the IM Unit, OCHA at [email protected] Kenya 30°E 31°E 32°E.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report on Western Equatoria Infographic V6 Final
    Joint report by United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) and Ofce of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) Report on violations and abuses against civilians in Gbudue April–August and Tambura States, Western Equatoria 2018 INTRODUCTION This report is jointly published by the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) and the Ofce of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), pursuant to United Nations Security Council resolution 2406 (2018). The report presents the ndings of an investigation conducted by the UNMISS Human Rights Division (UNMISS HRD) into violations and abuses of international human rights law and violations of international humanitarian law reportedly committed by the pro-Machar Sudan People’s Liberation Army in Opposition (SPLA-IO (RM)) and the Government’s Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) against civilians in the states of Gbudue and Tambura, in Western Equatoria, between April and August 2018. The report documents the plight of civilians in the Western Equatoria region of South Sudan, where increased violence and attacks between April and August 2018 saw nearly 900 people abducted, including 505 women, and forced into sexual slavery or combat, and over 24,000 displaced from their homes. The report identies three SPLA-IO commanders who may bear the greatest responsibility for the violence committed against the civilian population in Western Equatoria during the period under consideration. HRD employed the standard of proof of reasonable grounds to believe in making factual determinations about the violations and abuses incidents, and patterns of conduct of the perpetrators. Unless specically stated, all information in the report has been veried using several independent, credible and reliable sources, in accordance with OHCHR’s human rights monitoring and investigation methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Country Portfolio
    South Sudan Country Portfolio Overview: Country program established in 2013. USADF currently U.S. African Development Foundation Partner Organization: Foundation for manages a portfolio of 9 projects and one Cooperative Agreement. Tom Coogan, Regional Director Youth Initiative Total active commitment is $737,000. Regional Director Albino Gaw Dar, Director Country Strategy: The program focuses on food security and Email: [email protected] Tel: +211 955 413 090 export-oriented products. Email: [email protected] Grantee Duration Value Summary Kanybek General Trading and 2015-2018 $98,772 Sector: Agro-Processing (Maize Milling) Investment Company Ltd. Location: Mugali, Eastern Equatoria State 4155-SSD Summary: The project funds will be used to build Kanybek’s capacity in business and financial management. The funds will also build technical capacity by providing training in sustainable agriculture and establishing a small milling facility to process raw maize into maize flour. Kajo Keji Lulu Works 2015-2018 $99,068 Sector: Manufacturing (Shea Butter) Multipurpose Cooperative Location: Kajo Keji County, Central Equatoria State Society (LWMCS) Summary: The project funds will be used to develop LWMCS’s capacity in financial and 4162-SSD business management, and to improve its production capacity by establishing a shea nut purchase fund and purchasing an oil expeller and related equipment to produce grade A shea butter for export. Amimbaru Paste Processing 2015-2018 $97,523 Sector: Agro-Processing (Peanut Paste) Cooperative Society (APP) Location: Loa in the Pageri Administrative Area, Eastern Equatoria State 4227-SSD Summary: The project funds will be used to improve the business and financial management of APP through a series of trainings and the hiring of a management team.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretary-General's Report on South Sudan (September 2020)
    United Nations S/2020/890 Security Council Distr.: General 8 September 2020 Original: English Situation in South Sudan Report of the Secretary-General I. Introduction 1. The present report is submitted pursuant to Security Council resolution 2514 (2020), by which the Council extended the mandate of the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) until 15 March 2021 and requested me to report to the Council on the implementation of the Mission’s mandate every 90 days. It covers political and security developments between 1 June and 31 August 2020, the humanitarian and human rights situation and progress made in the implementation of the Mission’s mandate. II. Political and economic developments 2. On 17 June, the President of South Sudan, Salva Kiir, and the First Vice- President, Riek Machar, reached a decision on responsibility-sharing ratios for gubernatorial and State positions, ending a three-month impasse on the allocations of States. Central Equatoria, Eastern Equatoria, Lakes, Northern Bahr el-Ghazal, Warrap and Unity were allocated to the incumbent Transitional Government of National Unity; Upper Nile, Western Bahr el-Ghazal and Western Equatoria were allocated to the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army in Opposition (SPLM/A-IO); and Jonglei was allocated to the South Sudan Opposition Alliance. The Other Political Parties coalition was not allocated a State, as envisioned in the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan, in which the coalition had been guaranteed 8 per cent of the positions. 3. On 29 June, the President appointed governors of 8 of the 10 States and chief administrators of the administrative areas of Abyei, Ruweng and Pibor.
    [Show full text]
  • Visit to Terekeka [Oct 2020]
    Visit to Terekeka and St Stephen’s School, South Sudan – 17th – 18th March 2020 Report by Mike Quinlan Introduction Following my participation in a SOMA (Sharing of Ministries Abroad) Mission to the Internal Province of Jonglei from 7th to 16th March, I was able to make a short visit to Terekeka and to St Stephen’s School escorted by the Bishop of Terekeka, Rt Rev Paul Moji Fajala. Bp Paul met me at my hotel in Juba and drove me to Terekeka on the morning of Tuesday 17th March. We visited St Stephen’s School and I also saw some of the other sights of Terekeka (mainly boats on the bank of the Nile). Bp Paul also took me to see his house in Terekeka. After a night at a comfortable hotel, which had electricity and a fan in the evening, Bp Paul drove me back to Juba on the morning of Wednesday 18th March. I was privileged to be taken to meet the Primate of the Episcopal Church of South Sudan (ECSS), Most Rev Justin Badi Arama at his office. ABp Justin is also the chair of SOMA’s International Council. Bp Paul also took me to his house in Juba, where I met his wife, Edina, and had lunch before he took me to the airport to catch my flight back to UK. Terekeka is a small town about 75km north of Juba on the west bank of the White Nile. It takes about two and a half hours to drive there from Juba on a dirt road that becomes very difficult during the rainy season.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 South Sudan Education Statistical Booklet
    Education Statistics for Western Equatoria Government of Republic of South Sudan Ministry of General Education and Instruction State Statistical Booklet Western Equatoria Republic of South Sudan Ministry of General Education and Instruction Directorate of Planning and Budgeting Department of Data and Statistics Education Management Information Systems Unit Juba, South Sudan www.goss.org © Ministry of General Education and Instruction 2012 This publication may be used as a part or as a whole, provided that the MoGEI is acknowledged as the source of information. This publication has been produced with financial and technical support from UNICEF, FHI360, and SCiSS. For inquiries or requests, please use the following contact information: George Mogga / Director for Planning and Budgeting / [email protected] Fahim Akbar / Senior EMIS Advisor / [email protected] Moses Kong / EMIS Officer / [email protected] Paulino Kamba / EMIS Officer / [email protected] Joanes Odero / Programme Associate / [email protected] Deng Chol Deng / Programme Associate / [email protected] 1 Foreword Message from Minister Joseph Ukel Abango On behalf of the Ministry of General Education and Instruction (MoGEI), I am pleased for the fifth education census data for the Republic of South Sudan (RSS). The collection and consolidation of the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of Learning Spaces (RALS) conducted in 2006. RALS covered less than half of the primary schools operating in the country at the time. By 2011, data from pre-primary, primary, secondary, an Alternative Education Systems (AES), and technical and vocational education and training (TVET) schools, centres, and institutes were collected.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan's Equatoria
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 493 | APRIL 2021 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan’s Equatoria By Alan Boswell Contents Introduction ...................................3 Descent into War ..........................4 Key Actors and Interests ............ 9 Conclusion and Recommendations ...................... 16 Thomas Cirillo, leader of the Equatoria-based National Salvation Front militia, addresses the media in Rome on November 2, 2019. (Photo by Andrew Medichini/AP) Summary • In 2016, South Sudan’s war expand- Equatorians—a collection of diverse South Sudan’s transitional period. ed explosively into the country’s minority ethnic groups—are fighting • On a national level, conflict resolu- southern region, Equatoria, trig- for more autonomy, local or regional, tion should pursue shared sover- gering a major refugee crisis. Even and a remedy to what is perceived eignty among South Sudan’s con- after the 2018 peace deal, parts of as (primarily) Dinka hegemony. stituencies and regions, beyond Equatoria continue to be active hot • Equatorian elites lack the external power sharing among elites. To spots for national conflict. support to viably pursue their ob- resolve underlying grievances, the • The war in Equatoria does not fit jectives through violence. The gov- political process should be expand- neatly into the simplified narratives ernment in Juba, meanwhile, lacks ed to include consultations with of South Sudan’s war as a power the capacity and local legitimacy to local community leaders. The con- struggle for the center; nor will it be definitively stamp out the rebellion. stitutional reform process of South addressed by peacebuilding strate- Both sides should pursue a nego- Sudan’s current transitional period gies built off those precepts.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Returns to South Sudan Post CPA to June 2009
    IOM Tracking of Spontaneous Returns Project Total Returns to South Sudan Post CPA to June 2009 Table of Contents Acknowledgements..................................................................................................................................... 2 Summary..................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Background....................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Objectives ......................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Methodology..................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1. En-route Tracking............................................................................................................................. 5 3.2. Area of Return Tracking................................................................................................................... 6 4. Capacity Building of SSRRC and VRRC......................................................................................... 6 5. Total Estimated Number of Returns ................................................................................................. 8 6. Analysis of Area of Return - Cumulative Data, February 2007 to June 2009................................ 10 6.1. Total
    [Show full text]
  • 1 AU Commission of Inquiry on South Sudan Addis Ababa, Ethiopia P. O
    AU Commission of Inquiry on South Sudan Addis Ababa, Ethiopia P. O. Box 3243 Telephone: +251 11 551 7700 / +251 11 518 25 58/ Ext 2558 Website: http://www.au.int/en/auciss Original: English FINAL REPORT OF THE AFRICAN UNION COMMISSION OF INQUIRY ON SOUTH SUDAN ADDIS ABABA 15 OCTOBER 2014 1 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... 3 ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER I ..................................................................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 8 CHAPTER II .................................................................................................................. 34 INSTITUTIONS IN SOUTH SUDAN .............................................................................. 34 CHAPTER III ............................................................................................................... 110 EXAMINATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND OTHER ABUSES DURING THE CONFLICT: ACCOUNTABILITY ......................................................................... 111 CHAPTER IV ............................................................................................................... 233 ISSUES ON HEALING AND RECONCILIATION .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Needs and Agency Conflict: a Case Study of Kajo Keji County, Sudan
    African Studies Quarterly | Volume 11, Issue 1 | Fall 2009 Local Needs and Agency Conflict: A Case Study of Kajo Keji County, Sudan RANDALL FEGLEY Abstract: During Southern Sudan’s second period of civil war, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) provided almost all of the region’s public services and greatly influenced local administration. Refugee movements, inadequate infrastructures, food shortages, accountability issues, disputes and other difficulties overwhelmed both the agencies and newly developed civil authorities. Blurred distinctions between political and humanitarian activities resulted, as demonstrated in a controversy surrounding a 2004 distribution of relief food in Central Equatoria State. Based on analysis of documents, correspondence and interviews, this case study of Kajo Keji reveals many of the challenges posed by NGO activity in Southern Sudan and other countries emerging from long-term instability. Given recurrent criticisms of NGOs in war-torn areas of Africa, agency operations must be appropriately geared to affected populations and scrutinized by governments, donors, recipients and the media. A Critique of NGO Operations Once seen as unquestionably noble, humanitarian agencies have been subject to much criticism in the last 30 years.1 This has been particularly evident in the Horn of Africa. Drawing on experience in Ethiopia, Hancock depicted agencies as bureaucracies more intent on keeping themselves going than helping the poor.2 Noting that aid often allowed despots to maintain power, enrich themselves and escape responsibility, he criticized their tendency for big, wasteful projects using expensive experts who bypass local concerns and wisdom and do not speak local languages. He accused their personnel of being lazy, over-paid, under-educated and living in luxury amid their impoverished clients.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan: Bi-Weekly Humanitarian Situation Report Emergency Type: Humanitarian Crises Issue 06| Date: 16– 31 March 2021
    South Sudan: Bi-Weekly Humanitarian Situation Report Emergency type: Humanitarian Crises Issue 06| Date: 16– 31 March 2021 KEY FIGURES COVID-19 IPC PHASE 5 10 281 113 135545 9 835 108 000 6 5 939 8.3 M 2.3 M confirmed deaths Tests recoveries People Counties consultations People in Need of South Sudanese cases performed targeted conducted Humanitarian Refugees in Assistance neighboring countries HIGHLIGHTS 1.6M 1.4M Internally Malnourished Children • A cumulative of 10 281 COVID-19 confirmed cases and 113 deaths (case fatality Displaced rate of 1.1%) have been reported in South Sudan since the onset of the outbreak. • 292 healthcare workers have been confirmed for COVID 19 since the start of the outbreak on 5 April 2020. 125K 483K • South Sudan’s COVID-19 vaccination drive kicked off on 6 April 2021 with health Persons living in Malnourished Women PoC1 workers receiving their first dose of the Astra Zeneca vaccine in Juba. • WHO has graded the humanitarian emergency occasioned by the severe food insecurity as a Grade 2 event that will require additional resources and support from the regional and headquarters for an adequate response. 77 5.82M • WHO delivered 164 interagency health kits (can support 227 000 people), 84 Stabilization Severely Food Insecure Centers pneumonia kits, 10 severe acute malnutrition with medical complication (SAM/MC) kits, and 21 cholera investigation kits have been delivered to the responding partners in the six priority IPC 5 counties. • Five confirmed and 27 suspected rubella cases have been line-listed in Tambura where rubella virus transmission is going on 121 Children under one year vaccinated 066 with oral polio vaccine (20%) Initial numbers of children vaccinated 962 158 against measles Counties with confirmed measles 00 outbreaks in 2021 PoC1 s sites with confirmed measles 00 outbreaks in 2021 Counties with malaria cases South Sudan rolled out the COVID-19 vaccine on 6 April 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of South Sudan Request for an Extension of the Deadline For
    The Republic of South Sudan Request for an extension of the deadline for completing the destruction of Anti-personnel Mines in mined areas in accordance with Article 5, paragraph 1 of the convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Antipersonnel Mines and on Their Destruction Submitted at the 18th Meeting of the State Parties Submitted to the Chair of the Committee on Article 5 Implementation Date 31 March 2020 Prepared for State Party: South Sudan Contact Person : Jurkuch Barach Jurkuch Position: Chairperson, NMAA Phone : (211)921651088 Email : [email protected] 1 | Page Contents Abbreviations 3 I. Executive Summary 4 II. Detailed Narrative 8 1 Introduction 8 2 Origin of the Article 5 implementation challenge 8 3 Nature and extent of progress made: Decisions and Recommendations of States Parties 9 4 Nature and extent of progress made: quantitative aspects 9 5 Complications and challenges 16 6 Nature and extent of progress made: qualitative aspects 18 7 Efforts undertaken to ensure the effective exclusion of civilians from mined areas 21 # Anti-Tank mines removed and destroyed 24 # Items of UXO removed and destroyed 24 8 Mine Accidents 25 9 Nature and extent of the remaining Article 5 challenge: quantitative aspects 27 10 The Disaggregation of Current Contamination 30 11 Nature and extent of the remaining Article 5 challenge: qualitative aspects 41 12 Circumstances that impeded compliance during previous extension period 43 12.1 Humanitarian, economic, social and environmental implications of the
    [Show full text]
  • Water for Eastern Equatoria (W4EE)
    Water for Eastern Equatoria (W4EE) he first integrated water resource management (IWRM) project of its kind in South Sudan, Water Water for Eastern for Eastern Equatoria (W4EE) was launched in Components 2013 as part of the broader bilateral water Tprogramme funded through the Dutch Multiannual Equatoria (W4EE) Strategic Plan for South Sudan (2012–2015). W4EE focuses on three interrelated From the very beginning, W4EE was planned as a pilot components: IWRM programme in the Torit and Kapoeta States of The role of integrated water resource manage- Eastern Equatoria focusing on holistic management of the ment in fostering resilience, delivering economic Kenneti catchment, conflict-sensitive oversight of water Component 1: Integrated water resource management of the development, improving health, and promoting for productive use such as livestock and farming, and Kenneti catchment and surrounds peace in a long-term process. improved access to safe drinking water as well as sanitati- on and hygiene. The goal has always been to replicate key Component 2: Conflict-sensitive management of water for learnings and best practice in other parts of South Sudan. productive use contributes to increased, sustained productivity, value addition in agriculture, horticulture, and livestock The Kenneti catchment is very important to the Eastern Equatoria region for economic, social, and biodiversity reasons. The river has hydropower potential, supports the Component 3: Safely managed and climate-resilient drinking livelihoods of thousands of households, and the surroun- water services and improved sanitation and hygiene are available, ding area hosts a national park with forests and wetlands operated and maintained in a sustainable manner. as well as wild animals and migratory birds.
    [Show full text]