4548 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS March 8, 1979

GREEN, Mr. LEACH of Louisiana, and Mr. COURTER, Mr. DELLUMS, Mr. DIXON, Mr. DoN­ Mr. GRISHAM, Mr. HEFTEL, Mr. HOLLAND, Mr. TAUKE. NELLY, Mr. DOUGHERTY, Mr. DOWNEY, Mr. HORTON, Mr. LEVITAS, Mr. LLOYD, Mr. LONG H .R. 1297 : Mr. DERRICK. DRINAN, Mr. EVANS of the Virgin Islands, Of Maryland, Mr. MADIGAN, Mr. MATHIS, Mr. H.R. 1324: Mr. MOAKLEY, Mr. SIMON, Mr. Mr. FAZIO, Mr. FASCELL, Mrs. FENWICK, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. MOFFEIT, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. PRITCHARD, Mr. LAFALCE , Mr. H ORTON , Mr. FERRARO, Mr. FISH, Mr. FLOOD, Mr. FORD Of PASHAYAN, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. RODINO, Mr. HEFTEL, Mr. NEDZI, Mr. GREEN, Mr. UDALL , Michigan, Mr. FORSYTHE, Mr. GARCIA , Mr. THOMAS, Mr. VENro, Mr. YOUNG Of Missouri, Mr. D'AMOURS, Mr. MAVROULES, Mr. MITCHELL GAYD OS, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. GREEN, Mr. GUAR­ and Mr. EVANS of Georgia. of Maryland, Mr. DIGGS , Mr. OTTINGER , Mr. INI, Mr. HANLEY, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. HAWKINS, H .J . Res. 74: Mr. ANNUNZIO, Mr. ASHBROOK, SABO, Mr. WALKER, Mr. MILLER of California, Mr. HOLLENBECK, Ms. HOLTZMAN, Mr. HOWARD, Mr. BOWEN, Mr. ROBERT W. DANIEL, Jr., Mr. Mr. SEIBERLING, Mr. ROSE, Mr. DOWNEY, Mr. Mr. HUTTO, Mr. JENRETTE, Mr. KEMP, Mr. Ko­ DANNEMEYER, Mr. FITHIAN, Mr. HINSON, Mr. WoLPE, Mr. STARK, Mr. PRICE, Mr. RoE, Mr. GO VSEK, Mr. KOSTMAYER, Mr. LEDERER, Mr. JEFFRIES, Mr. KINDNESS, Mr. MOLLOHAN, Ms. PANETTA , and Mr. LEACH of Louisiana. LEHMAN, Mr. LELAND, Mr. LENT, Mr. LOWRY, 0AKAR, Mr. SNYDER, Mr. STUMP, Mr. WINN, H .R. 1509: Mr. HAGEDORN, Mr. KINDNESS, Mr. MARKS, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. MAVROULES, Ms. Mr. YOUNG of Florida, and Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee. Mr. RINALDO, Mr. JEFFRIES, Mr. FORSYTHE, Mr. MIKULSKI, Mr. MIKVA, Mr. MILLER of Cali­ ATKINSON, Mr. DAN DANIEL, Mr. LAFALCE, Mr. fornia, Mr. MINETA, Mr. MINISH, Mr. MITCHELL H.J. Res. 86: Mr. MOTTL, Mr. KELLY, Mrs. PATTEN, Mrs. HOLT, Mr. LAGOMARSINO, Mr. of New York, Mr. MITCHELL of Maryland, Mr. HOLT, Mr. CORCORAN, Mr. DANNEMEYER, Mr. JACOBs, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. RoussELOT. Mr. MOAKLEY, Mr. MOFFETT, Mr. MURPHY of Penn­ GINGRICH, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. LEACH of Lou­ FROST, Mr. TRAXLER, Mr. STANGELAND, Mr. sylvania, Mr. MYERS of , Mr. isiana, Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, and Mr. DORNAN. GAYDOS, Mr. CHAPPELL, Mr. GRISHAM, Mr. NOLAN, Mr. NOWAK, Mr. OTTINGER, Mr. PATTEN, EVANS Of Georgia, Mr. VENTO, Mr. MILLER Of Mr. PEPPER, Mr. RAILSBACK, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. H.J. Res. 213: Mr. COLLINS of Texas, Mr. Ohio, and Mr. MATTOX. RATCHFORD, Mr. RODINO, Mr. RoE. Mr. ROSEN­ DAVIS Of South Carolina, Mr. DEVINE, Mr. H.R. 1511: Mr. YOUNG of Florida, Mr. THAL, Mr. ROYBAL, Mr. SCHEUER, Mrs. SCHROE­ DORNAN, Mr. DUNCAN Of Tennessee, Mr. EVANS SOLOMON, Mr. LAGOMARSINO, Mr. HARSHA , Mr. DER, Mr. SEIBERLING, Mr. SHANNON, Mr. SIMON, of Georgia, Mr. GUYER, Mrs. HOLT, Mr. HUTTO, MILLER Of Ohio, Mr. WHITEHURST, Mr. KIND­ Mr. SOLARZ, Mrs. SPELLMAN, Mr. STAGGERS, Mr. LOTT, Mr. LUJAN, Mr. MCKAY, Mr. SLACK, NESS , and Mr. LOTT. Mr. STARK, Mr. STOKES, Mr. THOMPSON, Mr. Mr. CHARLES WILSON of Texas, Mr. WON PAT, and Mr. YATRON. H.R. 1603: Mr. ANTHONY, Mr. ENGLISH, and WAXMAN, Mr. WEISS, Mr. WOLFF, Mr. YATRON, Mr. ADDABBO. Mr. YOUNG of Florida, Mr. ZEFERETTI, Mr. H .J. Res. 229; Mr. ABDNOR, Mr. ARCHER, Mr. H.R. 1608: Mr. BROWN of California, and McCLOSKEY, Mr. M cEwEN, Mr. CLINGER, Mr. BOWEN, Mr. BREAUX, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. Mr. GRAMM. EDWARDs of California, and Mr. GRAY. BROYHILL, Mr. CLEVELAND, Mr. COLLINS of H.R. 1650: Mr. DRYNAN, Mr. JoNES of H .R. 2153: Mr. FITHIAN, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. Texas, Mr. DAN DANIEL, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. Tennessee, Mr. STANGELAND, Mr. RoE, Mr. WINN, Mr. MILLER of California, Mr. PANETTA, ERLENBORN, Mr. FINDLEY, Mr. FLOOD, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. ERDAHL, Mr. LEATH Of Texas, Mr. MINETA, Mr. KOGOVSEK , Mr. MIKVA, Mr. FRENZEL, Mr. FUQUA, Mr. GINN, Mr. GORE, Mr. Mr. PRICE, Mr. BINGHAM, Mr. PERKINS, Mr. BONIOR of Michigan, Mr. HUGHES, Mr. GRADISON, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mrs. HOLT, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. PEPPER, Mr. Dowr=EY, Mr. WEAVER, Mr. VAN DEERLIN, Mr. HORTON, Mr. JoHNSON of Colorado, Mr. LAGO­ MAGUmE, Mr. HAGEDORN, Mr. MITCHELL Of SCHEUER, Mr. BRINKLEY, Mr. UDALL, Mr. MARSINO, Mr. LLOYD, Mr. LOTT, Mr. Mc­ Maryland, Mr. PATTERSON, Mr. SABO, Mr. MOAKLEY, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. PATTERSON, Mr. DONALD, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. MONTGOMERY, Mr. HORTON, Mr. GREEN, Mr. CORCORAN, Mr. EVANS of Georgia, Mr. LAFALCE, and Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. PEPPER, Mr. MADIGAN, and Mrs. SPELLMAN. VENTO. RoussELOT, Mr. SEBELIUS, Mr. STUMP, Mr. H.R. 1735: Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania. H.R. 2191: Mr. BARNES, Mr. DELLUMS, and VAN DEERLIN, Mr. VANDER JAGT, Mr. WAMPLER, H .R . 1855: Mr. COLLINS of Texas, Mr. Mr. Russo. Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. WHITEHURST, Mr. CHARLES WHITEHURST, and Mr. DORNAN. H .R. 2226: Mr. JEFFORDS. WILSON of Texas, and Mr. WINN. H .R. 1856: Mr. DORNAN. H .R . 2291: Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. Bu­ H. Con. Res. 54: Mr. MINETA, Mrs. HOLT, Mr. MIKVA, and Mr. BLANCHARD. H.R. 1906: Mr. STUDDS, Mr. EMERY, Mr. CHANAN, Mr. CLEVELAND, Mr. CONABLE , Mr. LoTT, Mr. HOWARD, Mr. CLAUSEN, Mr. ROE, DOUGHERTY, Mr. ERDAHL, Mr. GREEN, Mr. HOR­ H. Res. 105: Mr. KOGOVSEK, Mr. CAVANAUGH, Mr. MITCHELL of Maryland, and Mr. JENRETTE. Mr. HUGHES, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. WEAVER, and TON, Mr. LAGOMARSINO , Mr. LEE, Mr. LENT, Mr. Mr. MOAKLEY. McEWEN, Mr. MITCHELL of Maryland, Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. PATTEN, Mr. H .R. 1910: Mr. ANDREws of North Dakota., RAHALL, Mr. RANGEL , Mr. ROE, Mr. WEISS, Mr. AMENDMENTS Mr. ERTEL, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. McHuGH, Mr. WHITEHURST, Mr. WINN, and Mr. ZEFERETTI. SABO, Mr. FITHIAN, Mr. WOLPE, Mr. BINGHAM, H.R. 2544: Mr. KINDNESS. Under clause 6 of rule XXIII, pro­ Mr. PANETTA, Mr. TRAXLER, and Mr. WEAVER. H.R. 2647: Mr. GEPHARDT, Mr. JENRETTE, posed amendments were submitted as H.R. 1958: Mr. MARRIOTT, Mr. MILLER of Mr. FITHIAN, and Mr. DASCHLE. follows: Ohio, Mr. YOUNG of Florida, Mr. LAGOMAR­ H .R. 2648: Mr. GEPHARDT, Mr. JENRETTE, H.R. 2479 SINO, Mr. COLLINS of Texas, Mr. LOTT, and Mr. FITHIAN, Mr. EvANS Of Georgia, and Mr. By Mr. SYMMS: Mr. DORNAN. DASCHLE. -Page 5, line 16, add the following immedi­ H.R. 2126: Mr. ADDABBO, Mr. ANDERSON of H.J. Res. 49 : Mr. DORNAN. ately after the period: "The President shall California. Mr. BAILEY, Mr. BARNES, Mr. BI­ H .J. Res. 69: Mr. ALBOSTA, Mr. ANDERSON make every effort to reach an agreement with AGGI, Mr. BINGHAM, Mrs. BOUQUARD, Mr. BRAD­ Of California, Mr. BEILENSON, Mr. BEVILL, Taiwan to assure that the facilities used by EMAS, Mr. BRODHEAD, Mr. BROOMFIELD, Mr. Mr. BRODHEAD, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. CARTER, such inc:;trumentality to conduct its affairs BROWN Of California; Mr. JOHN L. BURTON, Mr. CHENEY, Mr. CoELHo, Yr. CC'RR .. DA, Mr. in the United States be at or near the loca­ Mr. PHILLIP BURTON, Mr. CARR, Mrs. CHIS­ DANNEMEYER, Mr. DERRICK, Mr. DIXON, Mr. tions of the consular establishments of Tal­ HOLM, Mr. CLAY, Mrs. COLLINS of Illinois, DowNEY, Mr. DuNcAN of Tennessee, Mr. wan in the United States existing on Decem­ Mr. CONTE, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. CORRADA, Mr. ERDAHL, Mr. FAZIO, Mr. FLooD, Mr. FRoST, ber 31. 1978."

EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS MEDIA OWNERSffiP Department's opinion on why media con­ your Department's opinion on why media glomerates have escaped antitrust en­ conglomerates have not fallen under anti­ forcement under present law. I also asked trust enforcement by the Justice Department HON. LARRY PRESSLER the Attorney General for the antitrust under present law. When I do introduce leg­ OF SOUTH DAKOTA islation this spring, I would like to place in intentions of the Justice Department the Congressional Record the anti-trust in­ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES with regard to some of the national tentions of your Department with regard to Thursday, March 8, 1979 media conglomerates. I submit the cor­ such conglomerates as CBS; Times, Inc.; Dow respondence for printing in the RECORD. Jone.<-.' Knight-Ridder; Gulf and Western; e Mr. PRESSLER. Mr. President, I have Here follows my letter to the Justice Gannett; Newhouse; Scripps-Howard; and been very concerned about the increasing others. These are examples of media conglom­ concentration of media ownership in this Department and the response: erates that are nearly pure monopolies in our country. This concentration is a potential Washington, D.C., December 22, 1978. society. Not only do they publish huge chains threat to our free press rights. I have in­ Hon. GRIFFIN BELL, of newspapers, but they also have cross-own­ Attorney General of the United. States, ership of other media outlets-including troduced legislation this year to address Department of Justice, polling firms, boo'<: distribution networks, the entire question of media competition Washington, D.C. pulp mills, timber land, record distribution and I shall be introducing more. DEAR MR. BELL: My staff and T are drafting groups, life insurance and casualty com­ Late last year, I wrote Attorney Gen­ possible legislation to amend the anti-trust panies, and other activities that are not eral Griffin Bell asking for the Justice laws to include media monopolies. I request necessarily directly related to publishing.

• This "bullet" symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by the Member on the floor. March 8, 1979 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 4549 The types of monopolies these media con­ plications of permitting a few persons to con­ interest in the enforcement of the anti­ trust laws is greatly appreciated. glomerates represent l ncl ude: trol several media sources. Those concerns carry special weight wnen, as here, ccncen­ Sincerely yours, (1) Territorial Monopolies. The media mo­ tration may be reflected in a reduction in the JOHN H. SHENEFIELD, nopolies are a purer form of monopoly than diversity of opinion or the vigor of First Assistant Attorney General, some other business monopolies. Fo;r exam­ Amendment expression. Such specialized con­ Antitrust Divison.e ple, Ford and General Motors products com­ siderations have been ut111zed in other con­ pete directly in the same market--but we texts. For example, in the areas of television have allowed our chain newspapers a com­ and radio, as well as banking, Congress has LET'S SCRATCH THE CAT TALKS plete, pure monopoly in most of their respec­ enacted sta.tutes that restrict the degree to t! ve cities; which a single person or entity may own (2) Horizontal and Vertical Monopolies. large numbers of firms providing those serv­ HON. PAUL FINDLEY The First Amendment is being used to cover ices. I expect that these restrictions were not OF ILLINOIS a huge number of activities other than the founded solely upon economic considerations IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES distribution of news. Indeed, news distribu­ of concentration, but reflect also the notion tion-as compared to advertising distribu­ that single ownership of several such firms is Thursday, March 8, 1979 tion-has come to represent only about one­ not in the public interest. It may be appro­ quarter to one-third of the business of many priate for the Congress to consider these con­ e Mr. FINDLEY. Mr. Speaker, the of these monopolies. cerns with regard to single ownership of United States should immediately termi­ (3) Pricing Monopolies. The media monop­ several newspapers as well. nate the conventional arms transfer olies have a pure pricing monopoly in that Beyond this, I can provide some specific talks

He could always be counted on to be fair MORE BUCKS FOR THE BANG: NEW PUBLIC national environment. Here, surveys of mass and honest when called upon for his opinion ATTITUDES TOWARD FOREIGN POLICY opinion have a great deal more to tell us, concerning issues of the day. (By Wllllam Schambra) and the message is fairly clear: American Mr. Beam was patriotic. He served his Iranian students topple a statute of the will 1s recovering nicely from the trauxna of country in the U.S. Army during World War shah . . . Nicaraguan troopers patrol a rub­ Vietnam. Let's examine some recent I, and he was a member of Oherryvllle ble-strewn street . . . Vietna.mese soldiers developments: American Legion Post No. 100. dash past the Imperial Palace in Phnom 1. Do we have the will to be a superpower? Mr. Beam was also a family man. Survived Penh. TV nightly news has been livened Here, the trend is marked. We believe we are by a dedicated and loving wife, two sons, considerably of late, with vivid footage from second-best, and we are unhappy about it. siX daugbters, fifteen grandchlldren and four the world's burgeoning crisis spots. As shown on page 29 of "Opinion Roundup" great-granddaughters. There is a growing sense among opinion in this issue, more and more Americans be­ He never neglected his famlly whlle he leaders that this year-with au these spon­ lieve that the United States is weaker mili­ was so actively involved in helping others. taneous crises, plus the impending battle tarily than the Russians: a. 43 percent plu­ His qualltles of leadership, loyalty, com­ over SALT and the possible culmination of rality held that position in November 1978. passion and dedication were much admired. the Camp David accords--will be a critical A December Gallup survey found that 61 He was a person whom we can emulate in one for our conception of the role we should percent of Americans believed Soviet power our dally Uves. Tohat is the best way we can, play in the world. The suggestion is now would increase in 1979, versus 51 percent say­ in a small way, repay Blaine Bea.m for his heard that foreign affairs may start vying ing our power would increase: since 1969, many <:ontrlbutions to his community. with economic matters for the attention and the Russian "power w111 increase" line has We will miss Mr. Beam's wise counsel. We concern of the public. consistently ridden above the American curve all share with his famlly a deep loss and to Other commentators urge a more sober (see pages 30-31) . And Americans are in­ his famlly we can say: Thank you for shar­ view of the situation: yes, there's more me­ creaslngly apprehensive: a June-July Harris ing him with so many of us during his 82 dia. attention to foreign crises, but it's all survey found that 43 per<:ent of respondents one big "Sands of Iwo Jima" to the viewer­ believed it was necessary for the United years on earth.e ship: good entertainment, nothing more. we States to be stronger than the Russians; only are told that, basically, the American public 8 percent would accept the "second-best" has little patience with the complexities of situation that we were seen to be ln. MORE BUCK FOR THE BANG? foreign affairs-what really holds public in­ 2. Do we have the wm to spend superpower terest are the bread-and-butter issues of money? Again, the trend is clear: support for the domestic economy. And survey research defense spending has been growing steadlly RON. WILLIAM F. GOODLING tends to bear out this notion. Since the end since our disentanglement from Vietnam. The OF PENNSYLVANIA of the Vietnam War, economic concerns have Harris survey on page 29 of this issue shows IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ranked far above foreign policy matters as that support for increased defense spending the nation's "most important problem," usu­ went from 28 percent in December 1976 to 52 Thursday, March 8, 1979 ally by margins of five or six to one (Public percent in November 1978; a situation that e Mr. GOODLING. Mr. Speaker, I Opinion, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 32). And there Lou Harris describes as a "remarkable tum­ seems to be no evidence of a change in this around." It is true that Americans balk at should like to bring to my colleagues at­ situation: an NBC News/Associated Press certain kinds of domestic sacrifices to reach tention an important article by William survey taken in mid-December asked people higher levels of defense spending-for in­ Schambra the entering farmer whose land torch has been passed to me-a part of the ACTER AND STRUCTURE OF AMERICAN AGRI­ amortization costs alone can exceed over !0 new generation of Americans. A generation CULTURE percent of his gross income in an average that is unwllling to watch the decay of hu­ Mr. Chairman and members of the com­ production year. Slight variation in yield and man rights around the world. John F. Ken­ mittee, I am here today at the request of prices can cause extreme financial dimcultles. nedy said, "The energy, faith, and devotion the committee to discuss the changing con­ TECHNOLOGY TREADMILL which we bring ... wlll light our country dition of American agriculture. On Septem­ and all who serve it ... the glow from that ber 26, 1978, we issued a study, entitled In an attempt to maintain income through fire can truly light the world." As a part "Changing Character and Structure of increased production, farmers made use of of that new generation, I wlll have a hand American Agriculture: An Overview." My technological breakthroughs. However, they in preserving and llluminating the human statement here today will summarize that found themselves requiring more equipment rights of all mankind. st udy and I would like to submit th& full and then more land, and stlll more powerful report !or the record. and :taster equipment to stay ahead of nar­ Our democracy is based on the conviction rowing profit margins, intlation, and com­ that man has the moral and intellectual The United States food system depend­ ence on increasingly !ewer farmers, who in petitive pressures. The result o! farm product capacity, as well as the inalienable right to specialization over the last 2 decades was govern himself with reason and justice. Ed­ turn are dependent on a series of !actors ucation is a. part of our democracy and beyond their control, raises a basic question that farm worker productivity ilncreased of farm sector resll1ency to withstand supply­ nearly twice as fast as that o! the industrial vitally important to a nation whose found­ worker. However, to maintain this produc­ ing fathers were the most intellectual demand fluctuations without increasing Government assistance. tivity, the farmer became dependent upon statesmen in modern history. petroleum-based Inputs of fuel, !ertl11zer, I care about America and it's people be­ Significant changes have occurred in our Nation's farming sector during the last three and pesticides as well as other agro-indus­ cause we know clearly what we seek, and trial services to operate his increasingly spe­ why. We seek peace, knowing that without decades. While the basic trend has been one of increasing concentration of !arinS as well cialized !arm. As these specialized and non­ peace, there can be no freedom, and witho:ut renewable inputs become more valuable, peace there can be no justice except for the as supporting fac111ties; the reciprocal has been a drastic reduction in the number of cost/price inflationary pressures on the small amount of pity the strong have upon farmer wlll increase. the weak. There must be an ideal that is family farms, people living on farms and a steadily employed, and respected by all na­ decline in rural vitality. A series of cost­ GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS tions. An ideal that comprehends the values price squeezes, specialized te<:hnology, and rn retrospect government policies, pro­ of freedom and affirms the equality of all the targeting of Government farm prograinS grams and regulations have had structural nations however large or small. has created a farm sector that has !ewer, implications which were not always evident. larger, and more powerful farms; less family Because America demands the best of me, While vaguely aimed at helping the "fam­ labor; less diverse production patterns; and ily farmer," Government assistance programs I will continue to give my best. Just as our increasing dependence on purchased inputs, founders cared about America, I care. And have benefited the largest farms to a greater foreign oil, and markets outside the United extent. Because they are geared to produc­ Just as they labored to establish our free­ States. doms, so wlll I labor to preserve those free­ tion, the percentage of farmers receiving Farm numbers have dropped from a high Government payments rises with farm size, doms. For who I am, what I am, and what I of 6.8 mllllon in 1935 to 2.34 mUllan reported wm be, I owe to the spirit that 1s America.e as does the size of the payment. Some Gov­ in the 1974 Census o! Agriculture. The ernment as!';istance prograinS have also be­ United States has been losing an average of come capitalized into land values, thereby 2,000. farmers per week since the 1940's. In benefiting larger landholders (many of the past, most !arms were owned by the whom are not farmers) to the greatest THE CHANGING CHARACTER AND fam111es who operated them. Today, it is extent. STRUCTURE OF AMERICAN AGRI­ estimated that less than one-hal! of all Similarly, Government tax policies have CULTURE farmland is owned by the !arm operator. promoted the trend away !rom smaller, The continued demise of the family farmer family-owned and operated !arms, while at­ and the reduced res111ency of our agricultural tempting to do the opposite. Past Federal HON. RICHARD NOLAN system to produce during adverse times is income tax laws provided an excellent tax an important question because Americans OF MINNESOTA shelter for outside investors. Recent estate depend upon the American Farmers' ablUty IN THE HOUSE OP' REPRESENTATIVES tax laws may inhibit sale of farmland out­ to produce food as well as his capacity to side the owning family, thus creating a Thursday, March 8, 1979 generate otr-farm employment. "landed aristocracy," with !ewer avenues for One out of every five workers is employ'ed new farmers to enter. • Mr. NOLAN. Mr. Speaker, recently by the agriculture-food system. It accounts the General Accounting Office pub­ !or 25% of GNP. And it exports one out o! In addition, policies to foster foreign sales lished a report entitled, "Changing every three harvested acres, making it a have put agriculture in a precarious position. major contributor to balancing our nations Agriculture's new role in the economy has Structure and Character of American made U.S. farmers vulnerable to the uncer- Agriculture: An Overview." The current growing trade deficits. The slgnlflcance of the food system is such tainties of world market conditions and as a. trend toward fewer and larger farms that, without adequate safeguards, the U.S. result has placed the United States in a po­ GAO says, is reducing the resilience of economy can be significantly affected by the sition which may demand increased govern­ U.S. agriculture and its ability to pro­ uncertainty o! other nations' agricultural mental activity to help buffer tluctuations in duce during adverse times. demands. supply and demand. March 8, 1979 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 4591 la.tionism, cited by President Carter only last LARGE FARMS VERSUS SMALL FARMS column that appears in the New Republic month, 83 other nations have signed the UN's is While the trend is increasingly towards and syndicated to a number of news­ g~nocide convention. "Despite the support of larger farms with the farms at the top of papers. every president since 1948," Mr. Carter said, the size scale dominating agricultural sales. A few weeks ago Richard Strout had a the U.S. still hasn't signed. (The top 2% of our nations• farms now ac­ Take normalization of relations with China. count for over one-third of all !arm sales) column about SALT II in which he fears this does not mean that smaller farms are that SALT II is a rerun of the 1919 Sen­ (heartily approved by this correspondent). ate debate on the League of Nations. Was the spilt with China ever necessary? less efficient. In fact expenses (as a percent Chou En-la.i came to the Geneva Conference o! !arm production) !or !arms marketing be­ I am not as pessimistic as he is but tween $10,000 and $200,000 are less than tor m June, 1954, looking !or friends in the West. there are real dangers that SALT II will John Foster Dulles wouldn't shake hands, those !arms producing more than $200,000 o! not be approved. agricultural products. and stalked out. The China. Lobby, led by Small- to mid-size farmers' variable costs I hope my colleagues will take the time Henry Luce's Time and Life, denounced are generally low because they typically do to read the TRB column: fraternization: Chou was "a political thug and professional assassin," said Life. Life's not pay themselves or their families mini­ .A RERUN OF l!H9? correspondent, Godfrey Blunden, called Chou mum wages and their equity is often high. I have had a love affair with Washington Relative operating costs are substantially a. saber-toothed political assassin." In 1971, for many years, and it has broken my heart reviewing those grotesqne events, Harrison lower than those o! the largest !arms. So­ many times. I suspect that it is going to do so ciety has thereby come to depend on the Salisbury called them "madness; clinical again this year. I cannot believe that the Sen­ paranoia.." Yet suspicion and hate are always smaller and medium sized !arms as an ideal ate will ratify the forthcoming SALT treaty, combination of resource control and abll1ty just below the surface in contending theol­ to restrain strategic arms. Yet if 34 senators ogies; the venom could be injected again to bounce back from adversity. Although a vote "No" there will be no limit, I fear, to the res111ent agriculture does not insure eco­ over SALT. Said Joe McCarthy of the "loss" consequent US-Soviet nuclear arms race. It of China, February 9, 1950 at Wheeling, West nomic stab111ty. it does maintain reasonable takes only 34 senators to defeat a treaty. It food supply stabUlty, which in turn. is Virginia.: "This must be the product of a. has happened before. great conspiracy on a. eca.le so immense as to closely tied to domestic and international Let me go back a bit. Years ago, in the economic policies. dwarf any previous venture in the history of Harding administration, a. tall, gawky, self­ man!" Now partisans here are demanding, FARM OWNERSHIP conscious youngster came to Washington "Who lost Iran?" Increased financial pressures on !arms have marveling at the nation's drive "back to (I found no reference to old Luce crusades resulted in changes in ownership patterns. normalcy." Since this reference is autobi­ in Time's cool account last week of Teng The corporate form of ownership makes up ographical, let me say that I had enlisted in Hsia.o-p'ing as "Man of the year.'' In 1937, a substantial portion of the larger farm Mr. Wilson's crusade "to make the world safe Gener.a.Iissimo and Madame Chiang Ka.i-shek classes (over 40 percent !or those !arms sell­ for democracy" and that it seemed to me in were Time's "Man and Wife of the Year." The ing $500,000 and over). However. the extent all innocence a goal worth giving one's life thought constantly intrudes whether, with to which these larger corporate farms are for. The Washington I came to laughed at the a. little more realism and understanding, or !arm-family owned and operated, agribusi­ war I had enlisted in, and said that dream I ness conglomerates. or privately owned by had followed was preposterous. (I have heard simple common sense, Korea, Vietnam and nonfarm families remains unknown. recently of a veteran back from Vietnam, the boycott of China. had to happen. As Anne The changes in farm structure have had a with the stump of an arm, taunted by stay­ O'Hare McCormick once wrote: "Nations substantial impact on the rural sector. Farm at-homes who said, "It serves you right"!) My never go out to meet destiny. It always population has dropped from over 15.6 mil­ feelings were not bitter in that far-off day, catches up with them at an unexpected turn lion in 1960 to just under 8.3 m1llion in for I had made no great sacrifice--surely my of the road.") 1976, with a disproportionate number of elders knew better than I! But I pondered, The most important single activity of world those immigrating being young high school and wondered, and the episode left a mark. politics is the prevention o! nuclear war. The graduates. Few in present-day Washington, I guess, have two superpowers have over 13,000 strategic Areas dominated by larger farms have been as sensitive a feeling about Section 2, Article nuclear warheads aimed at each other, ca­ shown to provide fewer social amenities to II, of the Constitution giving the president pable of destroying each other. In the mean­ their residents. Rural businesses have also the right to make treaties, "provided two­ time nuclear weaponry is proliferating; six declined since the more sophisticated needs thirds of the senators present concur." or seven nations possess it and it can hardly of larger farmers, coupled with ilnproved It was 60 years ago this July that Wilson be kept secret; in a few years, probably, small transportation, have carried much of farm returned from the peace conference to find nations, or terrorist groups, will have black­ business outside of rural business centers. the Senate in an ugly mood, and debate over mail weapons. Will the superpowers cooper­ SUMMARY the League of Nations and Versailles treaty ate to meet this shared danger? I would like to conclude my remarks by already begun (as it already has begun today The SALT talks began in 1969. For three summarizing four points. over the SALT treaty). That was the dream­ years Nixon and Brezhnev exchanged visits: 1. Farmers have been going out of busi­ a League of Nations, a parliament of man, "Upon these bridges," said Nixon in Annap­ ness at the rate of 2,000 per week since the and a court to settle its disputes. Wilson took olis, June 5, 1974, "we are erecting a series 1940's. This has concentrated the production his case to the country, pleading with superb of tangible economic and cultural exchanges of agriculture in fewer and fewer people. eloquence that the "dear ghosts" of fallen that will bind us more closely together." He 2. The remaining farmers have stayed in Americans called for ratification and fore­ casting (accurately) a second world war if called it an enduring "structure of peace." business by seeking off-farm income and/or The question. now, perhaps this year, 1s be­ getting larger. But the continuing cost/ it were rejected. At all times, during the pro­ price squeeze suggests that getting larger is longed Senate debate, more than three­ tween continued detente, and a new, more no longer a solution for staying in business. fourths favored some League; they could not venomous round in the arms race. The Krem­ 3. Aggregate Federal government statistics agree on which League. They voted twice­ lin leaders are old men. Brezhnev has tied masks what is happening to the individual November 19, 1919, and March 10, 1920. Ulti­ his personal prestige to the forthcoming farmer in different regions and by crops. As mate vote: 49 ayes, 35 nays-so ratification agreement. But almost every day new we&lp­ a result policymakers do not know the full failed. The world was stunned. Incidentally, ons are invented. ilnpact of their decisions. 12 of the Senator's 96 did not vote; at least An hysterical woman called me up from 4. The basic question which need to be ad­ eight of these 12 favored ratification. World Los Angeles the other day: she had seen the War II arrived punctually as Wilson pre­ dressed: Is the U.S. losing its farm family doomsday film of the American Conservative dicted. res111ency to produce during adverse eco­ Union warning that "annihilation is 20 min­ nomic times?e That still left Elihu Root's World Court. America wouldn't join, but in 1946 the idea utes away." They have bought time on 207 was revived; the Senate committee ap­ TV stations, so far, to show it. A new group proved unanimously and the Senate approved of 170 retired generals and admirals are .TRB CITES DANGER OF HISTORY it too, 62 to two. But the emasculating "Con­ banded to rouse America to its peril. RERUN nally Amendment" was added during fioor And there is hazard, of course. SALT comes de bat~; the Court couldn't hear issues involv­ down to confidence in our negotiators. The ing domestic American matters, and the U.S. details are stupefyingly technical. The pub­ HON. PAUL SIMON should be sole judge of what was "domestic." lic will deciae on the basis of its faith in All U.S. presidents since then have opposed Jimmy Carter, and such faith is apt to run OF U.LINOIS the Connally Amendment. Senator Hubert low in the midst of an economic recession. IN THE HOUSE OP REPRESENTATIVES Humphrey tried to get it repealed in 1959, In a Congress o! 535 members, only 34 sena­ Thursday, March 8, 1979 but !alled. Other nations have followed America's restrictive policy and the World tors (1! all vote) have veto power. I can't • Mr. SIMON. Mr. Speaker, one of the Court, today, is a wrath. resist the feeling that I am seeing a rerun best columns in the Nation is the TRB As another example o! America's wary iso- of 1919.e