Daf Ditty Eruvin 36: the Taxman

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Daf Ditty Eruvin 36: the Taxman Daf Ditty Eruvin 36: the Taxman Tax his land, Tax his bed, Tax the table At which he's fed. Tax his tractor, Tax his mule, Teach him taxes Are the rule. Tax his work, Tax his pay, He works for peanuts ; Anyway! 1 Tax his cow, Tax his goat, Tax his pants, Tax his coat. Tax his ties, Tax his shirt, Tax his work, Tax his dirt. Tax his tobacco, Tax his drink, Tax him if he Tries to think. Tax his cigars, Tax his beers, If he cries Tax his tears. Tax his car, Tax his gas, Find other ways To tax his ass. Tax all he has Then let him know That you won't be done Till he has no dough. 2 When he screams and hollers; Then tax him some more, Tax him till He's good and sore. Then tax his coffin, Tax his grave, Tax the sod in Which he's laid. Put these words Upon his tomb, 'Taxes drove me to my doom...' When he's gone, Do not relax, Its time to apply The inheritance tax. 3 MISHNA: A person may make a condition with regard to his eiruv of Shabbat borders. In other words, he need not decide in advance in which direction his eiruv should take effect. For example, he may deposit an eiruv on each of two opposite sides of his town, and say: If gentiles come from the east, my eiruv is in the west, so that I can escape in that direction; and if they come from the west, my eiruv is in the east. If they come from here and from there, i.e., from both directions, I will go wherever I wish, and my eiruv will retroactively take effect in that direction; and if they do not come at all, neither from here nor from there, I will be like the rest of the inhabitants of my town and give up both eiruvin that I deposited, leaving me with two thousand cubits in all directions from the town. RASHI 4 Similarly, one may say: If a Sage comes from the east and he is spending Shabbat beyond the boundaries of my town, my eiruv is in the east, so that I may go out to greet him there; and if he comes from the west, my eiruv is in the west. If one Sage comes from here, and another Sage comes from there, I will go wherever I wish; and if no Sage comes, neither from here nor from there, I will be like the rest of the inhabitants of my town. Rabbi Yehuda says: If one of the Sages coming from opposite directions was his teacher, he may go only to his teacher, as it is assumed that was his original intention. And if they were both his teachers, so that there is no reason to suppose that he preferred one over the other, he may go wherever he wishes. RASHI 5 Similarly, one may say: If a Sage comes from the east and he is spending Shabbat beyond the boundaries of my town, my eiruv is in the east, so that I may go out to greet him there; and if he comes from the west, my eiruv is in the west. If one Sage comes from here, and another Sage comes from there, I will go wherever I wish; and if no Sage comes, neither from here nor from there, I will be like the rest of the inhabitants of my town. Rabbi Yehuda says: If one of the Sages coming from opposite directions was his teacher, he may go only to his teacher, as it is assumed that was his original intention. And if they were both his teachers, so that there is no reason to suppose that he preferred one over the other, he may go wherever he wishes. GEMARA: The Gemara relates that when Rabbi Yitzḥak came from Eretz Yisrael to Babylonia, he taught all of the laws in the mishna in the opposite manner. That is to say, according to him, if the gentiles came from the east, his eiruv would be to the east, and, conversely, if the Sage came from the east, his eiruv would be to the west. This is difficult because if this is correct, there is a contradiction between the ruling concerning gentiles in the mishna and the ruling concerning gentiles in the baraita, and similarly there is a contradiction between the ruling concerning a Sage in the mishna and the ruling concerning a Sage in the baraita. 6 The Gemara answers: The apparent contradiction between the ruling concerning gentiles in the mishna and the ruling concerning gentiles in the baraita is not difficult: This case in the mishna (is referring to a tax collector [parhagabena], ( ּFrom the Iranian pāhragbān, meaning guard from whom one wishes to flee; whereas that case in the baraita is referring to the lord of the town, with whom he wishes to speak. Therefore, there are times that one wants to go out toward the gentile, while at other times one wants to flee from him. Similarly, the apparent contradiction between the ruling concerning a Sage in the mishna and the ruling concerning a Sage in the baraita is not difficult: This case in the mishna is referring to a scholar who sits and delivers public Torah lectures, and one wishes to come and learn Torah from him; whereas that case in the baraita is referring to one who teaches children how to recite the Shema, i.e., one who teaches young children how to pray, of whom he has no need. The baraita teaches that if a scholar came from one direction to deliver a public lecture and the schoolteacher came from the opposite direction, his eiruv is in the direction of the scholar. 7 We learned in the mishna that Rabbi Yehuda says: If one of the Sages was his teacher, he may go only to his teacher, as we can assume that this was his original intention. The Gemara asks: And what is the reason that the Rabbis do not accept this straightforward argument? The Gemara answers: The Rabbis maintain that sometimes one prefers to meet the Sage who is his colleague rather than the Sage who is his teacher, as sometimes one learns more from his peers than from his teachers. RASHI A number of commentaries state that this is a case where the one establishing the eiruv wishes to speak to the lord of the town with regard to the town’s needs. This justifies establishing an eiruv because it is for the purpose of a mitzva. Rav Ya’akov Emden explains that the lord of the town is its ruler and going out to greet him is part of the mitzva to greet a king. Summary A person may place two sets of eruv, one in each of two directions of his city, and he makes a condition that he will use the one which is desirable due to conditions that will develop as the Shabbos day occurs. In the diagram below, he can use either the eruv to the east or the one to the west, or neither, nor be as a member of his city. In the same diagram, he will want to use the eruv to the west to escape the enemy army which approaches from the east. 8 Conditional Eiruv Our Mishna says that one can place an eiruv with a condition, deciding on Shabbos how or if it should take effect. The Mishna lists the following examples: 1. If non-Jews are coming to the city from an unknown direction, and he wants to escape, he can place one eiruv in either direction, or stipulate: a. If they are in the west, my eiruv to the east should take effect. b. If they are in the east, my eiruv to the west should take effect. c. If they came from both sides, I can choose which eiruv should take effect. d. If they didn’t come at all, neither will take effect, and I will remain centered in my city. 2. If a sage is coming to the city from an unknown direction, and he wants to go to his lesson, he can place one eiruv in either direction, or stipulate: a. If he is in the west, my eiruv to the west should take effect. b. If he is in the east, my eiruv to the east should take effect. c. If two sages came, one in either direction, I can choose which eiruv should take effect. d. If none came, neither will take effect, and I will remain centered in my city. Rabbi Yehudah says that if one of the sages is his teacher, the eiruv in that direction takes effect, while if both are his teachers, he can choose which one he wants. 9 Coming or Going? When Rabbi Yitzchak came from Eretz Yisroel, his version of the Mishna reversed the relative directions in the cases of the non-Jews and sages. The Gemara explains that the cases of non-Jews and Sages are different ones. The non-Jews in our Mishna are who are collecting taxes, and therefore people want to avoid them, while those in Rabbi Yitzchak’s version are of the local government, who the residents want to greet. The case of the sages is when the sage in one direction is teaching Torah lessons, while the one in other direction is teaching children davening. People prefer to go to the sage who teaches Torah lessons, and therefore he will choose his eiruv in that direction.
Recommended publications
  • Fiscus Judaicus Accelerated the Parting of the Ways Between Judaism and Christianity Heemstra, Marius
    University of Groningen How Rome's administration of the Fiscus Judaicus accelerated the parting of the ways between Judaism and Christianity Heemstra, Marius IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2009 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Heemstra, M. (2009). How Rome's administration of the Fiscus Judaicus accelerated the parting of the ways between Judaism and Christianity: rereading 1 Peter, Revelation, the Letter to the Hebrews, and the Gospel of John in their Roman and Jewish contexts. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 26-09-2021 How Rome’s Administration of the Fiscus Judaicus Accelerated the Parting of the Ways between Judaism and Christianity RIJKSUNIVERSITEIT GRONINGEN How Rome’s Administration of the Fiscus Judaicus Accelerated the Parting of the Ways between Judaism and Christianity Rereading 1 Peter, Revelation, the Letter to the Hebrews, and the Gospel of John in their Roman and Jewish Contexts Proefschrift ter verkrijging van het doctoraat in de Godgeleerdheid en Godsdienstwetenschap aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen op gezag van de Rector Magnificus, dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewishness, Birth and Giyyur
    1 Zvi Zohar All Jews are Jews by Birth Biblical and Rabbinic Judaism agree, that anyone born to the appropriate Jewish parent – is Jewish. To most Jews, it sounds quite reasonable for Jewishness to derive from birth. However, such a determination is far from self-evident. Consider a counter-example: if a person was born on a kibbutz, and her two parents are members of the kibbutz, she is not automatically a member. Rather, upon reaching a certain age, she must decide if she wishes to apply for membership. If she applies, her application comes up for discussion by the kibbutz assembly, who then decide the matter by a vote. While it is reasonable to assume that a child born and grown on the kibbutz will be accepted for membership if she applies, it is not automatic. The important point (in the current context) is, that her membership is contingent upon at least two decisions: her decision to apply, and the assembly’s decision to accept her. In contrast, Jewishness is not contingent upon any person’s decision, but is regarded by tradition as a ‘fact of birth’. The sources of this self-understanding are very ancient: in the Bible, the Israelites are the “Children of Israel”, i.e., the lineal descendents of the Patriarch Jacob and his twelve sons. In the bible, then, the People of Israel are made up of persons born into a (very) extended family. Some notions accepted in Biblical times were abrogated or modified by the Oral Torah (Torah she- b’al peh); significantly, the concept of the familial nature of Jewishness was not only retained, but also even reinforced.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Coins
    HCpLAToR g2z; UF s:z9 i,l t! <H o rri*rx ITISTORY AND COINAGE OF TITE ARI<ADIAN LEAGAE OF 37O BCE COINS AND TITE SYT{OPTIC PROBLEM TIIE CELTIC COIN TITAT SAYS IT IS CELTIC Visit www.TomCederlind.com ... SYRACUSE. c. 404-400 Be. Si lver Dekadrachm, unsigned dies by Kimon . ... or call for a complimentary catalog .. .. TOM CEDERLIND NUMISMATICS & ANTIQUIT IE S PO Box 1963, Dept. C (503)228-2746 Portland, OR 97207 Fax (503)228-8130 www.TomCederlind.com/[email protected] Vol. 24. No.2 TIle CelatoY" Inside The CelatoY'9 ... February 2010 Consecutive Issue No. 272 Incorporating ROIlum Coins mId Clliwre FEATURES Publisher/Editor Kerry K. Wcttcrstrom [email protected] 6 History and Coinage of the Arkadian League of 370 BCE Associate Editors by Steve M. Benner Robert L. Black Michael R. Mehalick 24 Coins and the Synoptic Problem Page 6 by Peter E. Lewis For Back bsues From The Celtic Coin That Says It Is Celtic 1987 to May 1999 contact: 37 Wayne Sayles by Chris Rudd [email protected] DEPARTMENTS Art: Parnell Nelson 2 Editor's Note Coming Next Month Maps & Graphic An: Page 24 Kenny Grady 4 Letters to the Editor 41 The "Alliance" Deniers of Duke Richard I of P.O. Box 10607 Lancaster, PA 17605 Normandy Tel/Fax: 717-656-8557 by Alan S. DeShazo For FedEx & UPS deliveries: Kerry K. Welterstrom 42 Art and the Market 87 Apricot Ave Leola, PA 17540-1788 ~rofittS: in ilumiS:1l1i1ti( S: www.ceIator.com 43 Art and the Market The eels/or (ISSN .,048-0986) is an Independent joumal pub­ 44 Coming Events Page 37 lished on the first day 01 each month at 87 Apricot Ave .
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Law Research Guide
    Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Law Library Research Guides - Archived Library 2015 Jewish Law Research Guide Cleveland-Marshall College of Law Library Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/researchguides Part of the Religion Law Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Repository Citation Cleveland-Marshall College of Law Library, "Jewish Law Research Guide" (2015). Law Library Research Guides - Archived. 43. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/researchguides/43 This Web Page is brought to you for free and open access by the Library at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Library Research Guides - Archived by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Home - Jewish Law Resource Guide - LibGuides at C|M|LAW Library http://s3.amazonaws.com/libapps/sites/1185/guides/190548/backups/gui... C|M|LAW Library / LibGuides / Jewish Law Resource Guide / Home Enter Search Words Search Jewish Law is called Halakha in Hebrew. Judaism classically draws no distinction in its laws between religious and ostensibly non-religious life. Home Primary Sources Secondary Sources Journals & Articles Citations Research Strategies Glossary E-Reserves Home What is Jewish Law? Need Help? Jewish Law is called Halakha in Hebrew. Halakha from the Hebrew word Halakh, Contact a Law Librarian: which means "to walk" or "to go;" thus a literal translation does not yield "law," but rather [email protected] "the way to go". Phone (Voice):216-687-6877 Judaism classically draws no distinction in its laws between religious and Text messages only: ostensibly non-religious life 216-539-3331 Jewish religious tradition does not distinguish clearly between religious, national, racial, or ethnic identities.
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical and Talmudic Units of Measurement
    Biblical and Talmudic units of Measurement [email protected] – י"ז אב תשע"ב Ronnie Figdor 2012 © Sources: The size of Talmudic units is a matter of controversy between: [A] R’ Chaim Naeh. Shi’urei Torah. 1947, [B] the Hazon Ish (Rabbi Avraham Ye- shayahu Karelitz 1878-1953) Moed 39: Kuntres Hashiurim and [C] R’ Moshe Feinstein (Iggerot Moshe OC I:136,YD I:107,YD I:190,YD III:46:2,YD III:66:1). See also Adin Steinsaltz. The Talmud, the Steinsaltz edition: a Reference Guide. Israel V. Berman, translator & editor NY: Random House, 1989, pp.279-293. Volume Chomer1 (dry)=kor (dry,liquid). Adriv=2letech (dry). Ephah3 (dry)=4Bat5 (liquid). Se’ah (dry)6. Arbaim Se’ah (40 se’ah), the min. quantity of kor7 8 9 10 1 11 12 water necessary for a mikveh (ritual bath), is the vol. of 1x1x3 amot . Tarkav =hin (liquid). Liquid measures include a hin, ½ hin, ∕3 hin, ¼ hin, letech 2 1 1 1 13 14 15 a log (also a dry measure), ½ log, ¼ log, ∕8 log & an ∕8 of an ∕8 log which is a kortov (liquid). Issaron (dry measure of flour)=Omer ephah 5 10 (dry) measure of grain16. Kav (dry,liquid) is the basic unit from which others are derived. Kabayim17 (dry)=2 kav. Kepiza18 (dry) se’ah 319 1512 30 1 20 21 1 22 is the min. measure required for taking Challah. Kikar (loaf)= ∕3 kav. P’ras (½ loaf ) or Perusah (broken loaf)= ∕6 kav tarkav 2 6 30 60 23 1 24 20 25 26 52 2 1 27 = 4 betzim.
    [Show full text]
  • Akroterion 58 (2013) 151-159 152 CASA ESSAY Freely, Romans Are Not Encouraged to Become in Any Way Involved in This
    CASA ESSAY The essay competition is sponsored by the Classical Association of South Africa . This paper was judged to be the best student essay submitted to CASA for 2013. ‘DOMITIAN’S ATTITUDE TO THE JEWS AND JUDAISM’ Ursula Westwood, BA III, Classical Civilisation (University of Cape Town) The emperor Domitian has the reputation of being the ‘decided enemy of the Jews’.1 The information from which this conclusion can be drawn is found in a passage in Suetonius and one in Dio. As well as this, Roman writings of the time, such as those of Martial and Quintilian, support a view of Domitian as anti- Semitic. By examining the main literary accounts of his treatments of the Jews as well as contemporary writings, it will be possible to establish to what extent Suetonius and Dio give an accurate portrayal of his attitude towards the Jews. Before one can evaluate Domitian himself, it is first necessary to consider what the position of the Jewish people was in the Roman Empire before him and what the general Roman opinion was of them. Since the time of Julius Caesar, the Jews had enjoyed some favour from Rome, most significantly including religious liberty: while the claim that Judaism was recognised as a religio licita under Roman law is not by any means indisputable, there is enough evidence to suggest, as Pucci Ben Zeev concludes in her work on the documents quoted by Josephus, ‘that the same policy was implemented by Augustus toward all the Jews, no matter where they lived’, and this policy was of general religious liberty.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscus Judaicus © Christopher O’Quin
    The Growing Split between Synagogue and Church in the 1st Century The Fiscus Judaicus © Christopher O’Quin Be not deceived with strange doctrines, nor with old fables, which are unprofitable. For if we still live according to the Jewish law, we acknowledge that we have not received grace … [For we] have come to the possession of a new hope, no longer observing the Sabbath, but living in the observance of the Lord's Day … [For] it is absurd to profess Christ Jesus, and to Judaize. For Christianity did not embrace Judaism, but Judaism Christianity.”1 Do Not Accept Judaism. But if any one preach the Jewish law unto you, listen not to him. For it is better to hearken to Christian doctrine … than to Judaism…2 [For] as to their scrupulosity concerning meats, and their superstition as respects the Sabbaths, and their boasting about circumcision, and their fancies about fasting and the new moons … [these] are utterly ridiculous and unworthy of notice.”3 These are not the doctrines of Church Reformers, Medieval Catholic priests, or even of Constantine’s Court. These instructions come from the earliest years of the post-Apostolic Church-around 107 C.E. To most Messianic believers this comes as a great shock. How did the Church develop an understanding of itself that was so anti-Jewish and anti-Torah so early in its development? From these instructions one can clearly understand that key Torah commandments such as Kosher laws, Sabbath observance, circumcision and Torah festivals were already thought to be abolished. How could this anti-nomian theology develop so quickly in the early Church when the Apostolic Scriptures abound with examples that testify to the eternal nature of God’s Torah? It developed, in part, because Christian Church doctrine was based on much more than pure Apostolic teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • The Talmud--A Gateway to the Common Law
    Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 3 Issue 1 Article 4 1951 The Talmud--A Gateway to the Common Law Charles Auerbach Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Charles Auerbach, The Talmud--A Gateway to the Common Law, 3 W. Rsrv. L. Rev. 5 (1951) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol3/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Law Review by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 1951] The Talmud - A Gateway To The Common Law Charles Auerbach JEWISH LAW has its source in the Divine Commandments, precepts and ordinances given to the children of Israel through Moses at Mt. Sinai and called the Torah (Torah M'Sinai). In Hebrew, these five books of Moses are referred to as Torah Shebiktab (the written law). They constitute the bedrock of all Jewish law. These commandments, precepts and ordinances as set forth in the written law are enunciatory in nature and required much interpretation. There evolved, therefore, through the many generations, a great mass of oral teachings interpreting these laws, so multifarious as to require orderly arrange- ment. The work of assem- CHARLEs AUERBACH (A.B., 1920, LLB., bling this vast accumula- 1922, Western Reserve University) is a prac- tion of laws and traditions ricing attorney in Cleveland, a member of the faculty of Cleveland-Marshall Law School, and was begun by the great and chairman of the Court of Conciliation and noble expounder of the Arbitration of the Cleveland Jewish Comma- law, Hillel, about 200 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Maasertext Week 8: Discovering Maaser on Shabbos
    This page is sponsored by Federation Rabbi Yisroel Moshe 5 Guttentag Rabbinic Coordinator, KF Kosher; Federation Shailatext The author can be contacted at [email protected] MaaserText Week 8: Halachah Discovering Maaser on Shabbos Maasertext was launched to hamincha and on, (Mishna Brura: 261:28). Shabbos has begun, this approach would not encourage members of the public Therefore, if the bulk of one’s Shabbos meal be relevant. to separate terumos and maasros. would be at risk due to its tevel status, one may Previously seen as a complex mitzvah maaser during this period. If the tevel in one’s Can produce which was not and one which is difficult to perform, food is only a side dish (eg just a salad), it is maasered be eaten on Shabbos? the system is designed to be easy and questionable whether this permission applies. Produce which has not been maasered is user-friendly. Once the local community have been tevel and may not be eaten. mekabel Shabbos, the bein hashemoshos This week, as our series draws to a leniencies are suspended. On a long summer In extenuating circumstances where close, Rabbi Y.M. Guttentag examines Friday afternoon, there typically would be time maaser was not separated and major aspects what happens when the Israeli source to maaser shortly after being mekabel Shabbos, of one’s Shabbos meal would be at risk, one of one’s produce is only discovered but on a short Friday afternoon, this would be should ask a Rov before deciding not to eat the on Shabbos.
    [Show full text]
  • A Journal of Torah and Science :: Volume 13, 2008-2009
    A PUBLICATION OF YESHIVA UNIVERSITY DerechHaTeva STERN COLLEGE FOR WOMEN A JOURNAL OF TORAH AND SCIENCE :: VOLUME 13, 2008-2009 :: DerechHaTeva A JOURNAL OF TORAH AND SCIENCE A PUBLICATION OF STERN COLLEGE FOR WOMEN YESHIVA UNIVERSITY VOLUME 13 2008 - 2009 STAFF EDITORS IN CHIEF: Shira Apfel Esther Frederick Rebecca Katz COVER DESIGN: Aliza Redisch LAYOUT: Yeshiva University Office of Communications and Public Affairs PRINTING: Executive Printing & Direct Mail, Inc. Elmsford, NY 10523 DEDICATION & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We dedicate this year’s publication of Derech Hateva: A Journal of Torah and Science to the memory of Anne Scheiber. Though a quiet and humble woman in her lifetime, Anne Scheiber’s name is well known throughout the halls of Stern College. Her donation to Yeshiva University has contributed to funding the dreams of many undergraduates who hope to help humanity through their studies in the sciences. Rabbi Dr. Norman Lamm, former president of the University, once described her impact on the Stern students, saying that though Anne Schieber died childless, she now has become “a mother to a whole community.” Throughout her life, Anne Scheiber felt discriminated against because she was both Jewish and female. After doing very well in her investments in the stock market, a place where religion and gender don’t matter, she chose to bequeath her savings to institutions that would help young women realize their full potential. Aside from her gift to Yeshiva University, Anne Scheiber also donated to an Israeli educational group for young women. Even greater than the gifts Anne Schieber left us, is the lesson she embodied.
    [Show full text]
  • Its Social and Legal Impact and a Possible Relation with Josephus' Antiquities
    chapter 12 The Fiscus Judaicus: Its Social and Legal Impact and a Possible Relation with Josephus’ Antiquities Marius Heemstra Introduction In this paper I will focus on the Flavian period (69–96ce), which was a crucially important time for both Judaism and Christianity. The single most important event during these years was, of course, the taking of Jerusalem in the year 70 and the subsequent destruction of the Temple by the Romans. On the Jewish side the founding of a rabbinic school by Yohanan ben Zakkai in the city of Jamnia/Yavne stands out, with permission from the Romans still during the siege of Jerusalem (according to rabbinic legend), laying the foundations for Judaism as we know it today.1 On the Christian side one may observe that besides Paul’s uncontested letters, dated to the fifties of the first century, virtually all other documents that were included in the New Testament were written under the Flavian Emperors or very shortly after. But it must be stressed that almost all of these Christian writers were Jews and could still be regarded as such by both Romans and other Jews. In my opinion this situation changed drastically by the end of the Flavian period, which can be regarded as a period of rapid transition in this respect.2 A very important factor during these years was the fiscus judaicus, intro- duced by Vespasian as the collector of the Jewish tax that was instituted after the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem.3 Every Jew within the Roman Empire had to pay this annual tax of two denarii for the benefit of the tem- ple of Jupiter on the Capitoline Hill of Rome, which was the same amount that had been paid by Jewish males between the ages of twenty and fifty for the ben- efit of their own Temple before it was destroyed by the Romans.
    [Show full text]
  • Practicing Life-Giving Theology
    HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050, (Print) 0259-9422 Page 1 of 8 Original Research A Samaritan merchant and his friend, and their friends: Practicing life-giving theology Author: The Department of New Testament and Related Literature (formerly the Department of New 1 Ernest van Eck Testament Studies) for the past 100 years has had a proud tradition of practicing life-giving Affiliation: theology. From very early on, several members of the department were critical voices against 1Department of New exclusive and discriminatory narratives of their time. Representing the voices of the Testament Studies, Faculty of disadvantaged, excluded and marginalised people, they critiqued systemic injustices, Theology and Religion, envisaged inclusive believing communities, advocated an open society with equal University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa opportunities for all and called for social justice. This article shows that the current members of the department are upholding this proud tradition in their research and publications. Research Project Registration: Common to the current trend in the department is the avoidance of a literal reading of texts Project Leader: E. van Eck by paying attention to the historical and social contexts of texts and using all possible Project Number: 2400030 approaches in reading the text from as many angles as possible. This approach has led to Description: new avenues to reread texts with concomitant new interpretations. As an example of this This research is part of the approach, a rereading of the so-called parable of the Samaritan is presented, challenging its research project dominant and universally accepted interpretation. The article concludes with a statement of ‘Hermeneutics and Exegesis’ directed by Prof.
    [Show full text]