DOCSLIB.ORG

Fort York Neighbourhood Public Realm Plan 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fort York Neighbourhood Public Realm Plan 2004 FORT YORK NEIGHBOURHOOD PUBLIC REALM PLAN du Toit Allsopp Hillier February 2004 FORT YORK NEIGHBOURHOOD PUBLIC REALM MASTER PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES Prepared by: Street Wall Definition 3-6 TABLE OF CONTENTS du Toit Allsopp Hillier Balconies, Terraces and Bay Windows 3-6 INTRODUCTION Corners and Prominent Sites 3-6 Entrances 3-7 For: Vision for a New Community 1-1 Street Designs 3-9 Wittington Properties Limited The Public Realm 1-1 Purpose of this Document 1-1 Plazacorp Investments Limited Fort York Boulevard 3-10 Planning Context 1-2 Malibu Investments Inc. The Site of the Neighbourhood 1-2 Bremner Boulevard 3-11 Waterfront Revitalization Vision 1-3 Bathurst Street 3-12 Participants: URBAN SETTING Fleet Street 3-13 Wittington Bronwyn Krog, Andrew Dales, Blair Wolk City/Waterfront Connections 2-2 Dan Leckie Way (Portland Street) 3-14 Plazacorp Leslie Yager Malibu Robert Hirsh, Mark Reeve Streets 2-3 Streets ‘B’ and ‘C’ 3-15 du Toit Allsopp Hillier Robert Allsopp, Catarina Galbraith, Bryce Miranda, Bicycle Routes and Pathways 2-4 Streets ‘D’ and ‘E’, Fort Street 3-16 Peter Smith, Yvonne Mazur, Rail Crossings 2-4 David Dennis Design The Mews 3-17 BA Group Alun Lloyd, Tim Arnott, Doug Hall An Integrated Park System 2-5 Housey Street 3-18 Quadrangle Architects Brian Curtner, Susan Ruptash, Leslie Klein, Roland Rom Colthoff Historical Setting 2-6 Page + Steele Architects Vladimir Losner, Sol Wassermuhl Under the Gardiner 3-19 IBI Group Jordan Struk, Matt Giuliano Fort York Views 2-7 Parks and Open Spaces 3-22 Archaeological Resources 2-8 Fort York 3-23 City of Toronto: Architectural Language 2-9 Planning Lynda Macdonald, Melanie Melnyk, Nigel Tahair Mouth of the Creek Park 3-24 Urban Design Robert Freedman, Eric Pedersen, James Parakh THE PUBLIC REALM PLAN Gore Park 3-25 Fort York Jo Ann Pynn Parks David O’Hara Key Components 3-1 Link Park 3-26 Development Engineering Tim Dennis, Nhat-Anh Nguyen Streets and Blocks 3-2 Streetscape Ideas 3-28 Street Rights-Of-Way 3-2 Public Art 3-31 With the Collaboration of: Easements and Setbacks from Gardiner 3-2 Councillor Joe Pantalone (Ward 19) Environmental Sustainability 3-32 Buildings on the Streets 3-3 Councillor Olivia Chow (Ward 20) Base Building Heights 3-3 Demonstration Plan 3-33 Concord Adex Developments Corporation Point Towers 3-3 R. Avis Surveying Inc. The Anatomy of the Street 3-4 Appendix A: Building Profiles The Friends of Fort York Street Proportions 3-4 Appendix B: Technical Street Section Building Setbacks 3-5 Appendix C: Fleet St. Long-Range Alternative Toronto Transit Commission Street Wall Heights 3-5 Bibliography FORT YORK NEIGHBOURHOOD PUBLIC REALM PLAN ii INTRODUCTION Vision for a New Community The Public Realm Purpose of this Document The guidelines set out in the Public Realm Plan, including the Building Profile Guidelines, may be The Fort York Neighbourhood presents a unique Simply put, the public realm consists of the spaces This Fort York Neighbourhood Public Realm modified or refined as specific buildings are city-building opportunity for Toronto. It will be a between buildings. While architecture can be Master Plan and Architectural Design Guidelines, designed and brought forward for approval vibrant new community developed on a major appreciated from a distance or from within a referred to here as the "Public Realm Plan", is the through the City’s Site Plan Approval process, if brownfield site near the Central Waterfront in the building, the public realm is experienced primarily next step in the planning and design process. This changes are generally consistent with the Plan’s west downtown. The distinctive character of the close-up, at ground level. It includes streets, document forms a set of guidelines, endorsed by overall vision and principles. neighbourhood will be informed by, and respond building frontages, sidewalks, front yard City Council, which outline the principles and to, its historically rich setting immediately south of landscaping and plantings, as well as larger open overall vision for the emerging neighbourhood. It Role of the Public Realm Plan the Fort York National Historic Site, the Garrison spaces such as parks and publicly accessible builds on the approved policies of the Official Plan Creek and the original Lake Ontario shoreline. courtyards or pathways between buildings. and the zoning by-laws that set out the location of The role of the Public Realm Plan is to guide the public spaces, density, height and built form development of the public streets and parks and With only four landowners holding most of the The review of any development application should envelopes, and will inform the City's review of adjoining private open spaces including the development blocks in the neighbourhood, the City take into consideration the building's relationship development applications in the area by setting a following: has seized the chance to establish a collaborative, with and contribution to the public realm. This benchmark for the best possible design of the comprehensive approach to the buildout of the Public Realm Plan seeks to achieve a high quality, streets, parks, pedestrian and cycle connections, • the relationship to adjacent neighbourhoods and community. This Public Realm Plan defines the well designed and liveable environment for people and public and private open spaces throughout the the public space linkages; principles for liveable and pedestrian-friendly living in and passing through the Fort York neighbourhood. The completion and approval of • the conceptual streetscape plans for the various streets, parks and open spaces in this emerging Neighbourhood. the Public Realm Plan is required prior to Site Plan types of streets; Toronto neighbourhood. approvals in the new neighbourhood. • the relationship between the public open spaces The Fort York Neighbourhood is planned as a high- and the private open spaces; and density, primarily residential community, with a • the conceptual design of the principal range of building types including stacked neighbourhood parks: Link Park and Gore Park. townhouses and mid-rise buildings along the street Also, illustrations of possibilities for the Fort edges, as well as slender point towers in specific York grounds and Mouth of the Creek Park are locations. In all of these cases, the buildings will be included. grade-related and address the streets. The bases of buildings will be designed with pedestrians in mind, through such elements as multiple entrances, appropriate setbacks/step-backs, landscape The Public Realm Plan also includes architectural development, architectural detailing and animating design guidelines including the following: uses at street level. • the location of build-to and setback lines; The area will also be served by a wealth of parks • the location of step-backs for taller buildings; and open spaces, including the Link Park - as a • the relationship of towers to base buildings; and central focus for local neighbourhood activities, Gore Park - as a heavily planted green space, and • the treatment of building projections as they the Fort grounds. The streets of the neighbourhood relate to the character and quality of the public will also be important public open spaces, designed streets and open spaces. with sidewalk setbacks, tree plantings, and front yard landscaping. Pedestrian and cycling connections will form an easily accessible network between these green spaces and the areas surrounding the neighbourhood. FORT YORK NEIGHBOURHOOD PUBLIC REALM PLAN INTRODUCTION 1-1 Planning Context The Site of the Neighbourhood The Fort York Neighbourhood (previously known In this Public Realm Plan, the Fort York as the Bathurst/Strachan Area) is a new high- Neighbourhood is taken to be the area extending density, mixed-use community. It will be built over from the north boundary of Fort York to Lake Shore approximately the next ten years at the western Boulevard at the south, and from Dan Leckie Way edge of Toronto’s Central Waterfront. Planning of (Portland Street) at the east to Strachan Avenue at the neighbourhood began in the early 1990s. the west. The current planning and design process began in Blocks 32, 33, 36 and 37 are part of the Railway late 2002, punctuated by a landmark “design Lands West planning district. These blocks and the initiative” (charrette) in January 2003. This 3-day related public spaces are included in this public charrette involved the three landowners realm study in order to achieve a coordinated (Wittington Properties, Plazacorp Investments, approach to the design of the public spaces. Blocks Malibu Investments), City staff, community and 32 and 36 are owned by the City of Toronto. Friends of Fort York representatives, and professional planning and design consultants. The The Fort York Neighbourhood is bounded to the conclusions reached in the charrette and south by Lake Shore Boulevard, and crossed subsequent discussions resulted in the adoption of diagonally by the elevated Gardiner Expressway. an amended Fort York Neighbourhood Secondary These roads and the rail corridor to the north act as Plan and Zoning By-laws by Toronto City Council strong barriers, physically, visually and in September 2003. perceptually, between the City to the north and the waterfront to the south, which the Public Realm Blocks 1 & 2A (H&R Developments), at the western Plan attempts to alleviate. Strachan Avenue and end of Fort York Boulevard, are included in site- Bathurst Street cross these corridors, although specific Secondary Plan provisions, which were neither accommodates pedestrians and cyclists adopted in 2001 and 2002. H&R Developments adequately and their intersections with Lake Shore have already submitted a Public Realm Plan as part Boulevard are particularly unfriendly. of their site-specific rezoning process. In 2002, Fort York Boulevard was built, extending The planning and design of parks and public spaces from Bathurst Street to Lake Shore Boulevard in the neighbourhood builds on the Fort York and approximately on the alignment of the original lake Garrison Common – Parks and Open Space Design and shoreline, the first major step in the revitalization of Implementation Plan and Fort York: Setting It Right.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gardiner Expressway and Lake Shore Boulevard Reconfiguration
    public information notice Gardiner Expressway and Lake Shore Boulevard Reconfiguration Waterfront Toronto and the City of Toronto of the environmental assessment for the The purpose of the ‘undertaking’ is to (City), the project co-proponents, are jointly proposed ‘undertaking’. address current problems and opportunities undertaking an environmental assessment to This study is intended to identify a plan of in the Gardiner Expressway and Lake Shore determine the future of the eastern portion action that can be fully coordinated with other Boulevard study area. Key problems include of the elevated Gardiner Expressway and Lake waterfront efforts. While the waterfront can a deteriorated Gardiner Expressway that Shore Boulevard from approximately Lower be revitalized with the Gardiner Expressway needs major repairs and a waterfront Jarvis Street to just east of the Don Valley retained or replaced or removed, a decision is disconnected from the city. Key opportunities Parkway (DVP) at Logan Avenue. As part of the needed now so development can be conducted include revitalizing the waterfront through planning process for this study, an EA Terms of in a coordinated and comprehensive fashion in city building, creating new urban form and Reference (ToR) was submitted to the Ministry this area and other waterfront neighbourhoods. character and new public realm space. The of the Environment for review as required The decision on the Gardiner Expressway and purpose of the undertaking will be refined under the Ontario Environmental Assessment Lake Shore Boulevard reconfiguration is an and described in more detail in the EA study. Act. If approved, the proposed ToR will serve important one that will influence development as a framework for the preparation and review in the City’s waterfront area for many years.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Development and Culture
    OPERATING ANAL OPERATING ANALYST NOTES Contents I: Overview 1 II: Recommendations 4 III: 2014 Service Overview and Plan 5 IV: 2014 Recommended Total Operating Budget 15 V: Issues for Discussion 30 Appendices: 1) 2013 Service Performance 32 Economic Development and Culture 2) Recommended Budget by Expense Category 34 2014 OPERATING BUDGET OVERVIEW 3) Summary of 2014 Service Changes 37 What We Do 4) Summary of 2014 New Economic Development and Culture's (EDC) mission is to & Enhanced Service advance the City's prosperity, opportunity and liveability by Changes 38 creating a thriving environment for businesses and culture, as well as contribute to the City's economic growth and engage 5) Inflows/Outflows to / from Reserves & Reserve Funds 39 cultural expressions and experiences. 6) 2014 User Fee Rate 2014 Budget Highlights Changes 42 The total cost to deliver this Program to Toronto residents in 2014 is $69.127 million, offset by revenue of $20.634 million for a net cost of $48.493 million as shown below. Approved Recommended Change Contacts (In $000s) 2013 Budget 2014 Budget $% Gross Expenditures 63,430.7 69,126.6 5,695.8 9.0% Judy Skinner Gross Revenue 18,028.9 20,633.7 2,604.8 14.4% Manager, Financial Planning Net Expenditures 45,401.9 48,492.9 3,091.0 6.8% Tel: (416) 397‐4219 Moving into this year's budget EDC's 2014 Operating Budget Email: [email protected] provides funds for several new and enhanced initiatives, which are aligned with the City's purpose of delivering the Andrei Vassallo Pan Am 2015 games, as well as initiatives that are part of the Senior Financial Planning Culture Phase ‐In Plan to bring the City's spending in culture to Analyst $25 per capita.
    [Show full text]
  • PATH Underground Walkway
    PATH Marker Signs ranging from Index T V free-standing outdoor A I The Fairmont Royal York Hotel VIA Rail Canada H-19 pylons to door decals Adelaide Place G-12 InterContinental Toronto Centre H-18 Victory Building (80 Richmond 1 Adelaide East N-12 Hotel D-19 The Hudson’s Bay Company L-10 St. West) I-10 identify entrances 11 Adelaide West L-12 The Lanes I-11 W to the walkway. 105 Adelaide West I-13 K The Ritz-Carlton Hotel C-16 WaterPark Place J-22 130 Adelaide West H-12 1 King West M-15 Thomson Building J-10 95 Wellington West H-16 Air Canada Centre J-20 4 King West M-14 Toronto Coach Terminal J-5 100 Wellington West (Canadian In many elevators there is Allen Lambert Galleria 11 King West M-15 Toronto-Dominion Bank Pavilion Pacific Tower) H-16 a small PATH logo (Brookfield Place) L-17 130 King West H-14 J-14 200 Wellington West C-16 Atrium on Bay L-5 145 King West F-14 Toronto-Dominion Bank Tower mounted beside the Aura M-2 200 King West E-14 I-16 Y button for the floor 225 King West C-14 Toronto-Dominion Centre J-15 Yonge-Dundas Square N-6 B King Subway Station N-14 TD Canada Trust Tower K-18 Yonge Richmond Centre N-10 leading to the walkway. Bank of Nova Scotia K-13 TD North Tower I-14 100 Yonge M-13 Bay Adelaide Centre K-12 L TD South Tower I-16 104 Yonge M-13 Bay East Teamway K-19 25 Lower Simcoe E-20 TD West Tower (100 Wellington 110 Yonge M-12 Next Destination 10-20 Bay J-22 West) H-16 444 Yonge M-2 PATH directional signs tell 220 Bay J-16 M 25 York H-19 390 Bay (Munich Re Centre) Maple Leaf Square H-20 U 150 York G-12 you which building you’re You are in: J-10 MetroCentre B-14 Union Station J-18 York Centre (16 York St.) G-20 in and the next building Hudson’s Bay Company 777 Bay K-1 Metro Hall B-15 Union Subway Station J-18 York East Teamway H-19 Bay Wellington Tower K-16 Metro Toronto Convention Centre you’ll be entering.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule 4 Description of Views
    SCHEDULE 4 DESCRIPTION OF VIEWS This schedule describes the views identified on maps 7a and 7b of the Official Plan. Views described are subject to the policies set out in section 3.1.1. Described views marked with [H] are views of heritage properties and are specifically subject to the view protection policies of section 3.1.5 of the Official Plan. A. PROMINENT AND HERITAGE BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES & LANDSCAPES A1. Queens Park Legislature [H] This view has been described in a comprehensive study and is the subject of a site and area specific policy of the Official Plan. It is not described in this schedule. A2. Old City Hall [H] The view of Old City hall includes the main entrance, tower and cenotaph as viewed from the southwest and southeast corners at Temperance Street and includes the silhouette of the roofline and clock tower. This view will also be the subject of a comprehensive study. A3. Toronto City Hall [H] The view of City Hall includes the east and west towers, the council chamber and podium of City Hall and the silhouette of those features as viewed from the north side of Queen Street West along the edge of the eastern half of Nathan Phillips Square. This view will be the subject of a comprehensive study. A4. Knox College Spire [H] The view of the Knox College Spire, as it extends above the roofline of the third floor, can be viewed from the north along Spadina Avenue at the southeast corner of Bloor Street West and at Sussex Avenue. A5.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 5 Has Been Updated to Reflect the Specific Additions/Revisions Outlined in the Errata to the Environmental Project Report, Dated November, 2017
    DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY This Revised Final Environmental Project Report – Volume 5 has been updated to reflect the specific additions/revisions outlined in the Errata to the Environmental Project Report, dated November, 2017. As such, it supersedes the previous Final version dated October, 2017. The report dated October, 2017 (“Report”), which includes its text, tables, figures and appendices) has been prepared by Gannett Fleming Canada ULC (“Gannett Fleming”) and Morrison Hershfield Limited (“Morrison Hershfield”) (“Consultants”) for the exclusive use of Metrolinx. Consultants disclaim any liability or responsibility to any person or party other than Metrolinx for loss, damage, expense, fines, costs or penalties arising from or in connection with the Report or its use or reliance on any information, opinion, advice, conclusion or recommendation contained in it. To the extent permitted by law, Consultants also excludes all implied or statutory warranties and conditions. In preparing the Report, the Consultants have relied in good faith on information provided by third party agencies, individuals and companies as noted in the Report. The Consultants have assumed that this information is factual and accurate and has not independently verified such information except as required by the standard of care. The Consultants accept no responsibility or liability for errors or omissions that are the result of any deficiencies in such information. The opinions, advice, conclusions and recommendations in the Report are valid as of the date of the Report and are based on the data and information collected by the Consultants during their investigations as set out in the Report. The opinions, advice, conclusions and recommendations in the Report are based on the conditions encountered by the Consultants at the site(s) at the time of their investigations, supplemented by historical information and data obtained as described in the Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Suitainable Adaptations for the Future
    Victorian House Sustainable adaptations for the future Rui Miguel Romão Raposo Thesis to obtain the Master's Degree in Architecture Supervisors Prof. Patrícia Isabel Mendes Lourenço Architect Michelle Xuereb Examination Committee Chairperson: Prof. Ana Paula Filipe Tomé Supervisor: Prof. Patrícia Isabel Mendes Lourenço Member of the Committee: Prof. Manuel de Arriaga Brito Correia Guedes May of 2018 I declare that this document is an original work of my own authorship and that it fulfills all the requirements of the Code of Conduct and Good Practices of the Universidade de Lisboa. This dissertation was written in English, which is one of the official languages of Canada. Because of its many variations, the English used was the Canadian English, which differs from British or American English, for instance. The units used follow the Metric system, official system used in Canada, with possible references to Imperial system, normally used to define construction materials. The relation between existing buildings and energy efficiency has become a priority when pursuing strategies to reduce the environmental footprint of construction. While cities around the world are density constructed, these existing buildings now have the opportunity to be improved by introducing new technologies and construction methods in response to the changing climate realities. The alternative is demolition to make room for more energy efficient buildings. Toronto is one such city that has experienced changes in density thanks to a hot real estate market. Pursuing the intent of maintaining the historical roots of the city, this document aims to define strategies on renovating existing buildings to make them more energy efficient, through the use of passive systems, and therefore preserving their original style and cultural sustainability for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Tax Claim Upset Sale ASHLAND BOROUGH As of 08/27
    2021 Tax Claim Upset Sale Municipality/Township ASHLAND BOROUGH 2021 Tax Claim Upset Sale Schuylkill County Tax Claim Bureau (570) 628-1405 ASHLAND BOROUGH as of 08/27/21 11:01:54AM Tax Number Property Address Owners Total Due 38-2-75 1033 Market Street Fishburn III David A, Fishburn Justin 3,056 38-2-75(1) 1037-1039 Market St Fishburn Kaitlin, Fishburn Derek 3,783 38-2-78 1115 Market Street Manhart Leroy, Manhart June A 2,337 38-2-86(1) 106 N Twelfth St Williams Karen 2,464 38-2-91 1319 Market St Williams Karen 3,461 38-2-98 1423 Market Street Williams Karen 8,144 38-2-128 1735 Market Street Williams Karen 2,219 38-2-162 1606 Market Street Johnson William K 3,585 38-2-188 1410 Market Street Hess David L, Hess Teresa L 3,040 38-2-204 1304 N Market Street Market Street Land Trust 1304 3,016 38-2-278 1423 Centre St Schmid Eric N 6,176 38-2-289 1511 Centre St Johnson William K 3,142 38-2-315 1721 Centre St Waskow Kurt J 2,460 38-2-393(1) 1210 Centre St Center Street Land Trust 4,920 38-3-22 928 Race Street Vernosky John 4,831 38-3-108 Market Street Citizens Natl Bank Ashland 2,663 38-3-137 739 Centre St Citizens Natl Bank Ashland 781 38-3-137(1) 0 Centre St Citizens Natl Bank Ashland 457 38-3-138 733 Centre St Aastha Homes Llc 32,133 38-3-182(1) 230 Chestnut Street Hubler Coleen C 2,326 38-3-202 17 Centre St Williams Karen 1,734 38-3-217 7 E Centre St Hamlett Debra 3,518 38-3-218 5 E Centre St Hamlett Debra L 3,189 38-3-270 400 Centre St Wentzel Jr Burd F, Wentzel Sandra L 4,719 38-3-270(1) 402 Centre St Wentzel Burd, Wentzel Sandra 1,585
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations
    Phase 1 Interim Report Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations City of Toronto Prepared for the City of Toronto by IBI Group and Stantec August 30, 2017 IBI GROUP PHASE 1 INTERIM REPORT LAND USE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO RAIL OPERATIONS Prepared for City of Toronto Document Control Page CLIENT: City of Toronto City-Wide Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail PROJECT NAME: Operations Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations REPORT TITLE: Phase 1 Interim Report - DRAFT IBI REFERENCE: 105734 VERSION: V2 - Issued August 30, 2017 J:\105734_RailProximit\10.0 Reports\Phase 1 - Data DIGITAL MASTER: Collection\Task 3 - Interim Report for Phase 1\TTR_CityWideLandUse_Phase1InterimReport_2017-08-30.docx ORIGINATOR: Patrick Garel REVIEWER: Margaret Parkhill, Steve Donald AUTHORIZATION: Lee Sims CIRCULATION LIST: HISTORY: Accessibility This document, as of the date of issuance, is provided in a format compatible with the requirements of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), 2005. August 30, 2017 IBI GROUP PHASE 1 INTERIM REPORT LAND USE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO RAIL OPERATIONS Prepared for City of Toronto Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Background .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Site and Area Specific Official Plan Policies 9, 21, 22, 265, 305 For
    CHAPTER 7 SITE AND AREA SPECIFIC OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES 9, 21, 22, 265, 305 FOR THE COMMUNITY OF NEW TORONTO Policy 9. Lake Shore Boulevard West, South of Birmingham Street, East of Fourteenth Street, and West of Ninth Street a) A mix of residential, commercial, light industrial and park uses are permitted. A variety of housing forms will be provided, with retail space and office uses integrated into residential development along Lake Shore Boulevard West. b) Alternative parkland dedication for residential development will be a minimum of 0.5 hectares per 300 units. Parkland dedication may consist of both land dedication and cash payment as well as other considerations. Policy 21. Lake Shore Boulevard Between Etobicoke Creek and Dwight Avenue a) Buildings should be built to the Lake Shore Boulevard West street line with a discretionary setback zone of 1.5 metres. Development blocks should provide a continuous building face for at least 70 per cent of the frontage on Lake Shore Boulevard West. Building heights should not exceed four storeys, except: 1 i) between Twenty Second Street and Twenty Third Street, where a six storey building is permitted if the extra height is stepped back from the street; and ii) for the area between Twenty Third Street and 3829 Lake Shore Boulevard West (one block west of Fortieth Street), where a six storey building is permitted; however, in areas where lot depths exceed 35 metres, higher building height may be considered. Building height should not exceed a 45-degree angular plane from the property line of the adjacent low-scale residential properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibition Place Master Plan – Phase 1 Proposals Report
    Acknowledgments The site of Exhibition Place has had a long tradition as a gathering place. Given its location on the water, these lands would have attracted Indigenous populations before recorded history. We acknowledge that the land occupied by Exhibition Place is the traditional territory of many nations including the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishnabeg, the Chippewa, the Haudenosaunee and the Wendat peoples and is now home to many diverse First Nations, Inuit and Metis peoples. We also acknowledge that Toronto is covered by Treaty 13 with the Mississaugas of the Credit, and the Williams Treaties signed with multiple Mississaugas and Chippewa bands. Figure 1. Moccasin Identifier engraving at Toronto Trillium Park The study team would like to thank City Planning Division Study Team Exhibition Place Lynda Macdonald, Director Don Boyle, Chief Executive Officer Nasim Adab Gilles Bouchard Tamara Anson-Cartwright Catherine de Nobriga Juliana Azem Ribeiro de Almeida Mark Goss Bryan Bowen Hardat Persaud David Brutto Tony Porter Brent Fairbairn Laura Purdy Christian Giles Debbie Sanderson Kevin Lee Kelvin Seow Liz McFarland Svetlana Lavrentieva Board of Governors Melanie Melnyk Tenants, Clients and Operators Dan Nicholson James Parakh David Stonehouse Brad Sunderland Nigel Tahair Alison Torrie-Lapaire 4 - PHASE 1 PROPOSALS REPORT FOR EXHIBITION PLACE Local Advisory Committee Technical Advisory Committee Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Association Michelle Berquist - Transportation Planning The Bentway Swinzle Chauhan – Transportation Services
    [Show full text]
  • Rise of the Neoliberal City: Condominium Development and Toronto's Cityplace
    Rise of the Neoliberal City: Condominium Development and Toronto's CityPlace Rachel Phillips Condominium developments have become ubiquitous features of Toronto’s urban landscape, emerging in disinvested neighbourhoods, former industrial sites, and defning entirely new neighbourhoods. Tis paper examines Toronto’s condominium boom in the context of the city’s increasingly neoliberal urban governance strategies. Te development of City Place – a 44-acre condominium project located near Toronto’s waterfront on former railway lands – is used in this paper as a case study that highlights how a neoliberal conception of the roles of government and the private sector has shaped condominium development in Toronto. Focusing on how City Place was planned, fnanced, and then sold to particular demographic groups in Toronto, this paper attempts to illustrate who benefts from the city’s condominium boom, who loses out, and how public and private interests work together to produce an increasingly privatized and commodifed urban landscape. Introduction Tis paper will attempt to understand how condominiums ft into this neoliberal landscape Te rise of the condominium is a well-doc- by exploring a series of sub-questions: whose umented phenomenon in Toronto. Since the interests are served by condominium develop- 1990s, a condominium boom has been trans- ment? What policy goals do they help to achieve? forming the city (Lehrer & Wieditz, 2009), with How does a neoliberal conception of citizenship condos popping up in disinvested inner-city and the role of government relate to condo- neighbourhoods, former industrial sites, public miniums and the lifestyles they encourage? In housing redevelopment projects, and new-build order to address these questions, I will begin by master-planned neighbourhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Waterfront
    STAFF REPORT . ACTION REQUIRED 9 Waterfront Branch in the Railway Lands Area – Architect Appointment Date: May 10, 2010 To: Toronto Public Library Board From: City Librarian SUMMARY To seek Toronto Public Library Board approval for the appointment of the architect for the new Waterfront Branch in the Railway Lands. RECOMMENDATIONS The City Librarian recommends that the Toronto Public Library Board: 1. appoints Kuwabara Payne McKenna Blumberg Architects (KPMB) for architectural services for the Waterfront Branch in the Railway Lands; and 2. authorizes and directs the appropriate Library staff to take the necessary action to give effect thereto. FINANCIAL IMPACT The 2010 to 2014 capital budget includes $8.637 million to build a new 15,000 square foot neighbourhood branch in the Railway Lands. The capital cost of building a new branch in the Railway Lands will be funded through development charge levies and Section 37 agreements. The construction budget, excluding contingencies is approximately $4 million. The architect fee will be negotiated, and it is expected to be within the signing authority of the City Librarian. However, with additional services that may be required due to the nature of this project, the fee may exceed $500,000, which requires Board approval. The Director, Finance and Treasurer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information. Waterfront Branch in the Railway Lands Area – Architect Appointment 1 DECISION HISTORY As the Board is aware, plans have been underway to locate a branch in the Railway Lands for a number of years. In June 2004, the Board approved a strategy for branch development that called for two additional branches to provide service in growing areas of the city – Scarborough City Centre and the Waterfront areas.
    [Show full text]