Books Articles, and Items of Academic Interest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Books Articles, and Items of Academic Interest Acad. Quest. (2014) 27:244–251 DOI 10.1007/s12129-014-9423-6 BOOKS, ARTICLES, AND ITEMS OF ACADEMIC INTEREST Books Articles, and Items of Academic Interest Peter Wood Published online: 25 April 2014 # Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 Academic Justice On February 18, Sandra Y. L. Korn, a senior “joint history of science and studies of women, gender and sexuality” major, published an incendiary essay in the Harvard Crimson that quickly caught the attention of many campus observers.1 Under the headline, “The Doctrine of Academic Freedom,” Ms. Korn wrote: “Let’s give up on academic freedom in favor of justice.” She proceeded to do just that. (http://www.thecrimson.com/ column/the-red-line/article/2014/2/18/academic-freedom-justice/) 1The wider attention included Peter Bonilla, “‘Harvard Crimson’ Column: Time to Get Rid of Academic Freedom,” FIRE, February 21, 2014, https://www.thefire.org/harvard-crimson-column-time-to-get-rid-of- academic-freedom/; Vic Rosenthal, “Sandra Korn’s Academic Totalitarianism,” Fresno Zionism (blog), Jewish Press, February 21, 2014, http://www.jewishpress.com/blogs/fresno-zionism/sandra-korns- academic-totalitarianism/2014/02/21/; Jonah Goldberg, “Attacking Diversity of Thought,” National Review Online, February 21, 2014, http://www.nationalreview.com/article/371625/attacking-diversity- thought-jonah-goldberg; Bruce Bawer, “Harvard’s Rebel without a Clue,” Frontpage Mag, February 21, 2014, http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/bruce-bawer/harvards-rebel-without-a-clue/; Bill Zeiser, “A Harvard Crimson Columnist Rails Against Academic Freedom. You Won’t Believe What Happens Next,” Spectatcle Blog, American Spectator, February 20, 2014, http://spectator.org/blog/57880/harvard- crimson-columnist-rails-against-academic-freedom-you-wont-believe-what-happens; Peter Wood, “Academic Justice and Intellectual Thuggery,” Minding the Campus, February 21, 2014, http:// www.mindingthecampus.com/forum/2014/02/academic_justice_and_intellect.html#more; Steve Larson, “Harvard Columnist: ‘Academic Justice’ Should Trump ‘Academic Freedom,’” Campus Freedom, February 24, 2014, http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=5454; and Patrick J. Deneen, “What’s Wrong with Academic Freedom,” American Conservative, March 5, 2014, http://www.theamericanconservative.com/ academicfreedom/. Peter Wood is editor of Academic Questions and president of the National Association of Scholars, 8 West 38th Street, Suite 503, New York, NY 10018-6229; [email protected]. His most recent book is A Bee in the Mouth: Anger in America Now (Encounter, 2007). Books, Articles, and Items of Academic Interest 245 Korn’s main point was that permitting free expression of views on campus inevitably means allowing the presentation of ideas that contradict the values of the campus community. Her lead example was the publication in 1971 of Harvard psychology professor Richard Herrnstein’s views on the heritability of IQ, which occasioned—rightlyinher view—efforts by the Students for a Democratic Society to disrupt his classes and get him fired. This attack on academic freedom was based on a premise that has become widespread in contemporary higher education: “No academic question is ever ‘free’ from political realities,” as Korn put it. Everything scholars do is political, either implicitly, as in the support that scholarship may tacitly give existing power structures, or explicitly, as in the efforts of scholars to advance social reform. Once we take this premise on board, it is a short stroll to the ideas that Korn argues. Since we are engaged in politics no matter what, we should take care to ensure that only the right kind of politics benefits from the prestige and authority of the university. A faculty member who violates the political ideals of the campus should therefore be silenced. Korn’s bracing formulation of this is that “academic justice” is more important than academic freedom. Korn unabashedly upholds opposing “racism, sexism, and heterosexism” as a campus priority and cannot imagine any valid reason for compromising this “rigorous standard” for anything as porous as “academic freedom.” She cites various examples of opinions that she believes the Harvard community could and should appropriately quash. In addition to Herrnstein’s views on the heritability of IQ, this includes the (“hateful”) views of a particular Indian scholar who writes about Muslims in India. Korn also singles out Prof. Harvey Mansfield, who, she says, may have “the legal right” to publish statements about “ladylike modesty,” but Korn herself would “happily organize with other feminists on campus to stop him from publishing further sexist commentary under the authority of a Harvard faculty position.” She recommends that those who favor an academic boycott of Israel bypass academic freedom objections and focus on academic justice instead. Offensive Speaking Korn’s short essay occasioned a great many responses in the conservative and independent press, mostly because of her astonishing candor. It isn’t 246 Books, Articles, and Items of Academic Interest difficult to find apologists for the academic Left’s domination of college campuses and the illiberal exclusion of alternative views that typically follows from that dominance. But these apologies usually take the form of “We uphold academic freedom, but we must also uphold certain norms…” Korn’s originality lies in her dispensing with the nod to academic freedom. Perhaps she simply recognizes more fully the implications of the everything-is-political premise. This might be reckoned as a new surge of agreement with Plato’s position in The Republic, in which Socrates is given the argument that, in the pursuit of justice, those who undermine the city’s noble lies must be excluded. In any case, John Stuart Mill’s ideas that intellectual freedom and debate are necessary foundations for a good society seem to have lost much of their grip on campus these days. A new willingness to shut down or even foreclose debate is visible. In truth, the trampling of academic freedom by forces within the academy has been underway for some time. Greg Lukianoff’s Unlearning Liberty: Campus Censorship and the End of the American Debate (2012) provided a Cook’s tour of one side of the suppression. But the story is still larger than speech codes and harassment rules. Benchmark cases include Harvard’s firing of president Larry Summers in 2005 and Columbia University’s anemic response to the mobbing of Jim Gilchrist in 2006. To these we can now add the September 2011 mobbing by University of Wisconsin students of a press conference in which the Center for Equal Opportunity’s Roger Clegg was attempting to speak, the swarming by radical students of a trustees’ meeting at Swarthmore in May 2013, and the shouting down at Brown University of New York City police commissioner Raymond Kelly in October 2013. A full account of this trend has yet to be written, but one aspect that deserves close attention is the emergence of rhetoric that justifies the use of force to prevent the expression of someone else’s views. In general, this rhetoric deploys the idea that the speaker who has been silenced enjoyed an unfair advantage and that the protesters were simply using the tools necessary to ensure that the “voice of the voiceless” was heard. The silencing of someone else, in other words, was itself an act of free speech. I am not clear where this conceit of silencing-in-the-name-of-free-speech originated, but I see it in print in the aftermath of every incident. After the Brown shout-down, for example, an alumna wrote: “I am proud to be part of Books, Articles, and Items of Academic Interest 247 the community that booed Kelly offstage. Nobody needs to entertain arguments that assert this in any way prevents open discourse.” So wrote Chris Norris-LeBlanc (Class of 2013) in an October 30, 2013, letter to the editor of the Brown Daily Herald. Norris-LeBlanc explained that the protestors were really “trying to preserve…rigorinanacademic environment.” That rigor is undermined when a dominant view “is unchallengeable.”“When this happens, freedom of speech is compromised.” (http://www.browndailyherald.com/2013/10/30/letters-community-weighs- protest-cancellation-ray-kelly-lecture/) In other words, to maintain free speech on campus, it is important to silence some views. As an unnamed Army major told Peter Arnett in Vietnam a long time ago, “It became necessary to destroy the town to save it.” Go/Don’tGo On February 11, the Pew Research Center issued a white paper, The Rising Cost of Not Going to College. Largely based on an October 2013 survey of 2,002 adults, the report is another entry in the long-running debate over the wisdom of American social policy that encourages a large percentage of young people to pursue college degrees. (http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2014/02/SDT- higher-ed-FINAL-02-11-2014.pdf) We have covered this debate in Academic Questions, at the National Association of Scholars national meeting in 2013, and in various other NAS publications. Most recently, Herb London reviewed William Bennett and David Wilezol’s Is College Worth It? (Fall 2013) in which the authors introduce a ranking of colleges based on “return on investment.” The authors of the new Pew report—Paul Taylor, Kim Parker, Rich Morin, Rick Fry, Eileen Pattern, and Anna Brown—do not cite Bennett and Wilezol. Nor do they mention Glenn Harlan Reynolds, whose new book, The New School: How the Information Age Will Save American Education from Itself, is another major expression of skepticism about the prevailing American model of “going to college.” Nor do they mention Richard Vedder and his Center for College Affordability and Productivity, which has issued a series of data-rich analyses of how college graduates are faring in the marketplace. But Bennett, Wilezol, Reynolds, and Vedder are pretty clearly the predicates of the opening sentence of The Rising Cost of Not Going to 248 Books, Articles, and Items of Academic Interest College, which refers to “those who question the value of college in this era of soaring student debt and high unemployment.” Taylor et al.
Recommended publications
  • Spring 2009 Prof
    TENTATIVE syllabus: subject to change – revised 3/26/09 10:52 AM The Muslim Experience in Contemporary European History HIEU 182 (Undergraduate) & HIEU 282 (Graduate) Spring 2009 Prof. Patrick H. Patterson Department of History, UC San Diego Office: Humanities and Social Science Building, Room 4084 Mail Code 0104 Phone: (858) 534-1999 MMW Program: (858) 534-4935 E-mail: [email protected] Course web site: webct.ucsd.edu use your UCSD ID and password to log in Office hours: Wednesdays, 11:00-1:00, in HSS 4084, and by appointment Aims and Scope of the Course: Europe at the beginning of the 21st century finds itself mired in controversies over whether Muslims and the faith they follow can successfully be integrated into a European society that is, to the extent that it is religious at all, predominantly Christian, at least nominally. Questions also arise over the compatibility between the largely secularized European social order and the traditions of Islamic law and politics. But substantial Muslim populations have, in fact, made their home in European countries for many years already: for decades in many parts of Western Europe, and for centuries in other places such as Russia and the Balkan territories of Kosova, Macedonia, Albania, Bulgaria, and Bosnia-Herzegovina. Turkey's desire to gain admission to the EU raises the prospect of a large, predominantly Muslim state -- albeit one with its own distinctive historical relationship to Islam -- becoming a new part of "Europe." And in addition to these more recent concerns, many more Muslims once lived in other parts of Europe before being compelled to leave, as happened notably in Iberia after the Reconquista and in Greece in 1922.
    [Show full text]
  • Don Delillo and the Harbingers of Mortality
    MISCELÂNEA Revista de Pós-Graduação em Letras UNESP – Campus de Assis ISSN: 1984-2899 www.assis.unesp.br/miscelanea Miscelânea, Assis, vol.9, jan./jun.2011 DON DELILLO AND THE HARBINGERS OF MORTALITY Gustavo Vargas Cohen (Doutorando — UFRS) RESUMO ABSTRACT O objetivo do presente texto é capturar The aim of the present text is to os sinais e contingências que podem capture the signs and contingencies dificultar e impedir o progresso de um that may hamper and prevent a writer’s escritor. A relevância de Don DeLillo para progress. It acknowledges Don DeLillo’s a literatura mundial é apresentada e relevance to world literature, corroborada por uma lista comentada corroborated by an informed listing of dos prêmios recebidos pelo autor e dos the awards the author has received and temas abordados individualmente em of the themes approached in his suas obras. O texto também discute os individual novels. The text also predecessores de DeLillo, as raízes discusses DeLillo’s predecessors, the históricas de seu tipo de representação historical roots of his kind of realistic realista da sociedade contemporânea e portrayal of contemporary society and as sementes de seu estilo de escrita pós- the seeds to his post-modern writing moderno. A parte final traz um quadro style. The final part brings an outline of geral dos sintomas como evidenciados the symptomatic evidence as shaped by pelos argumentos que seus críticos the arguments that critics offer for oferecem para consideração. O texto consideration. The text concludes by conclui reconhecendo os efeitos acknowledging the side-effects of colaterais de escrever com tamanha writing with such profusion, intensity profusão, intensidade e diversidade.
    [Show full text]
  • "Gay Community, Gay Identity and the Translated Text"
    Article "Gay Community, Gay Identity and the Translated Text" Keith Harvey TTR : traduction, terminologie, rédaction, vol. 13, n° 1, 2000, p. 137-165. Pour citer cet article, utiliser l'information suivante : URI: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/037397ar DOI: 10.7202/037397ar Note : les règles d'écriture des références bibliographiques peuvent varier selon les différents domaines du savoir. Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur. L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter à l'URI https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l'Université de Montréal, l'Université Laval et l'Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. Érudit offre des services d'édition numérique de documents scientifiques depuis 1998. Pour communiquer avec les responsables d'Érudit : [email protected] Document téléchargé le 12 février 2017 03:07 Gay Community, Gay Identity and the Translated Text Keith Harvey [...] until we organise ourselves block by neighbourhood by city by state into a united visible community that fights back, we're doomed. (Larry Kramer (1985) The Normal Heart: Act Two, Scene Thirteen, London, Methuen, p. 77) [...] le traducteur est cet individu qui représente, dans sa pulsion de traduire, toute une communauté dans son rapport avec une autre communauté et ses œuvres. (Antoine Berman (1984) L'Épreuve de Vétranger: culture et traduction dans l'Allemagne romantique, Paris, Gallimard, p. 283) In this article1, I wish to argue that the translation of texts whose subject matter is homosexual experience and struggle raises complex issues with regard to the notions of "gay community" and "gay identity".
    [Show full text]
  • While Europe Slept Freedom, and More
    FREE WHILE EUROPE SLEPT PDF Bruce Bawer | 262 pages | 01 Jan 2008 | Broadway Books (A Division of Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group Inc) | 9780767920056 | English | New York, United States While Europe Slept: How Radical Islam is Destroying the West from Within by Bruce Bawer I n the great cathedrals in Europe, a few people—usually elderly women—can be found at worship. Everybody else is a tourist, cameras hanging around their necks, meandering through. I was recently in Scotland, While Europe Slept I read a newspaper story commenting on three hundred deserted churches dotting the Scottish countryside, asking if they should be destroyed or turned into bars and cafes. Europe herself, in her proposed constitution, refuses to acknowledge the heritage of Judaism and Christianity—although Greece and Rome and the Enlightenment are acknowledged. Europe cannot remember who she is unless she remembers that she is the child not only of the ancient Greek and Roman worlds and the Enlightenment but also of Judaism and Christianity—the child, therefore, of Catholicism and the Reformation. If Europe abandons her religious heritage, the idea of While Europe Slept dies. What does it portend? If a culture forgets what it is, as I While Europe Slept Europe has done, it falls first into an agnostic shrugging of the shoulders, unable to say exactly what it is and believes, and from there it will inevitably fall into nihilism. Detached from its religious foundations, Europe will not remain agnostic. Difference tells us nothing in and of itself. Some ways of life and ways of being in the world are brutal, stupid, and ugly.
    [Show full text]
  • King's Research Portal
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2018.1493876 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Zia-Ebrahimi, R. (2018). When the Elders of Zion relocated to Eurabia: Conspiratorial racialization in antisemitism and Islamophobia . PATTERNS OF PREJUDICE, 52(4), 314-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2018.1493876 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Negative Reviews of Falling Man
    Schweighauser and Schneck 1 Do not cite. Schweighauser, Philipp and Peter Schneck. "Introduction: The American and the European DeLillo." Terrorism, Media, and the Ethics of Fiction: Transatlantic Perspectives on Don DeLillo. Ed. Schneck and Schweighauser. New York: Continuum, 2010. 1-15. The published version of this essay is available here: http://www.bloomsbury.com/us/terrorism-media-and-the-ethics-of-fiction- 9781441139931/ Prof. Dr. Philipp Schweighauser Assistant Professor and Head of American and General Literatures Department of English University of Basel Nadelberg 6 4051 Basel Switzerland Phone Office: +41 61 267 27 84 Phone Secretary: +41 61 267 27 90 Fax: +41 61 267 27 80 Email: [email protected] Schweighauser and Schneck 2 Prof. Dr. Peter Schneck Director of the Institute for English and American Studies University of Osnabrück Neuer Graben 40 Room 123 D-49069 Osnabrück Germany Phone: +49 541 969 44 12 or +49 541 969 60 42 Fax: +49 541 969 42 56 Email: [email protected] Introduction: The American and the European DeLillo Philipp Schweighauser and Peter Schneck In Mao II (1991), Don DeLillo lets his protagonist, the novelist Bill Gray, speak words that have been read as eerily prophetic in the aftermath of 9/11: "Years ago [...] I used to think it was possible for a novelist to alter the inner life of the culture. Now bomb-makers and gunmen have taken that territory. They make raids on human consciousness" (41). While the collective imagination of the past was guided, DeLillo seems to suggest, by the creative order and ethos of narrative fictions told by novelists, our contemporary fantasies and anxieties are completely controlled by the endless narratives of war and terror constantly relayed by the mass media.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapters 6 and 7 in The
    CHAPTER SIX Eight Years After 9/11: An Appraisal Elan Journo Is This Victory? During the final year of President George W. Bush’s tenure, some doubters who had long ago pronounced his war policy a dismal failure, felt themselves chastened by the facts. Once untiring, the chorus of reproach softened its tone, dialed down its volume, qualified its predictions. Drowning out rem- nants of that chorus was the re-energized pep squad for the Bush policy. El- bowing their way to center stage, they celebrated what they deemed manifest gains in the Bush “war on terror.” Listen to Sen. John McCain: “I’m not painting to you the most rosy scenario but I am telling you, compared to a year ago, before we started this surge, and with this great general, one of the great generals in American his- tory, General David Petraeus, that we are succeeding in Iraq.” The basis for that claim? “I’ve seen the facts on the ground,” he said upon returning from a visit to Iraq.1 Lending credibility to such assertions, the head of CIA, Mi- chael V. Hayden, told the Washington Post a while later that, “On balance, we are doing pretty well,” and listed evidence of what he took to be major strides forward: “Near strategic defeat of al-Qaeda in Iraq. Near strategic defeat for al-Qaeda in Saudi Arabia. Significant setbacks for al-Qaeda globally . as a lot of the Islamic world pushes back on their form of Islam.”2 By summer, a columnist for the Wall Street Journal happily announced: “The Iraq war is over.
    [Show full text]
  • {TEXTBOOK} Multiculturalism and Its Discontents Rethinking Diversity
    MULTICULTURALISM AND ITS DISCONTENTS RETHINKING DIVERSITY AFTER 9/11 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Kenan Malik | 9780857421142 | | | | | Multiculturalism and its Discontents Rethinking Diversity after 9/11 1st edition PDF Book Malik examines the increasing anxiety about the presence of the Other within our borders. Apr 25, Elias rated it liked it Shelves: tieto. However there is, I would argue, another distinction that needs to be made alongside the one between political policies and social reality: this is the distinction between the policies and the way that those policies are justified i. Malik has written that the turning point in his relationship with the left came with the Salman Rushdie affair. Aug 17, Melinda rated it liked it Shelves: nonfiction , politics. Thus, "the discourse of race did not arise out of the categories of Enlightenment discourse but out of the relationship between Enlightenment thought and the social organisation of capitalism. Readers also enjoyed. Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date. I will push for it, though. Malik's main areas of academic interest are philosophy of biology and philosophy of mind, scientific method and epistemology , theories of human nature , science policy, bioethics , political philosophy , the history, philosophy and sociology of race, and the history of ideas. Sicherlich wird es ihm dabei leicht gemacht, wenn der postkoloniale Staat in bester Tradition - man denke an das Kazikentum - Honoratioren korporiert und diese als Vertreter der Pakistanis, Sikhs, Afrokariben usw. The "off" amount and percentage simply signifies the calculated difference between the seller-provided price for the item elsewhere and the seller's price on eBay.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesbigay Identity As Commodity
    LesBiGay Identity as Commodity David M. Skover & Kellye Y. Testyt This Essay explores the deep dissonance that exists today between the validation of American LesBiGays in the commercial marketplace and their devaluation in politicaland legal arenas, and questions the failure of legal scholars and civil rights activists to account meaningfully for this dissonance in their theories andpractices. In America's popular culture, LesBiGay identities abound. In its po- litical culture, however, they emerge more tentatively. The commercial and entertainment industries increasingly commodify and celebrate LesBiGay identities. The courts and legislatures generally discount and condemn them. Thus, there is a deep dissonance between the validation of LesBiGay identities in the economic marketplace of items and ideas, and their de- valuation in the legal arena of rights and remedies. Such a dissonancefos- ters a fragmented sense of what LesBiGay identities are, and whether or how they are valued. Surprisingly, this schizoid treatment of LesBiGay identity is largely ignored or misunderstood by legal theorists and practitioners.Typically, they look primarily to politics and law for the paths to LesBiGay self- realization and social inclusion. The academy and activists have yet to ap- preciate that consumer-driven corporatism, commercial entrepreneurship, and the fetishes andfantasies of the mass media are unleashingpowerful culturalforces that will influence, for better or worse, the LesBiGay quest for liberty and equality. For if"the business ofAmerica is business," then surely the Americanizationof the LesBiGay identity is business, too. Copyright © 2002 David M. Skover and Kellye Y. Testy. t David Skover and Kellye Testy are friends and professorial colleagues at Seattle University School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Same-Sex Marriage and Simulacra: Exploring Conceptions of Equality
    American University Washington College of Law Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals Scholarship & Research 1998 Same-Sex Marriage and Simulacra: Exploring Conceptions of Equality Heather Hughes Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev Part of the Family Law Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Same-Sex Marriage and Simulacra: Exploring Conceptions of Equality Heather Lauren Hughes* The prospect of same-sex marriage has provoked divergent responses from gay rights proponents. Some consider the right to marry an essential part of equal protection and the single most important step towards equal- ity for gay people.1 "Equality" in this context means consistent legal treatment for all regardless of sexual orientation, in hopes that the exercise of 2 legal rights will force greater acceptance of lesbian and gay people. However, other pro-gay activists warn that declaring equal rights is an assimilation decree: a demand that gays and lesbians embrace institutions modeled on the heterosexual, monogamous relationship and achieve equal treatment only as analogous to heterosexual "counterparts."3 Still others criticize the idea of identity politics itself as reinforcing minority catego- ries defined through marginalization and promoting an essentialized vi- sion of minority groups that suppresses diversity and inequalities within categories.4 *B.A., University of Chicago, 1995. J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School, 1998. I would like to thank the editors of the Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, Professor Gerry Frug, and Terry Hughes for their invaluable help. ISee, e.g., ANDREW SULLIVAN, VIRTUALLY NORMAL 185 (1995) (stating that "[i]f nothing else were done at all, and gay marriage were legalized, ninety percent of the political work necessary to achieve gay and lesbian equality would have been achieved"); WILLIAM N.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Philosophy STEALING JESUS: Have Scrutinized Its Clout, Both Cultural and How Fundamentalism Political, and Its Demographics
    be sure, not NBC—it captures the attention investors and state officials, acquired addition- but does not hold the mind. al influence and fought to retain it, creating The clock ticking for America is the timer on enormous barriers to change. Policymakers a bomb: that’s Twitchell’s message, and he put aside any plans for nurturing long-term, delivers it in a book that is chatty, entertaining, sustainable growth. When the prosperity and too informal, finally, for its own good. To be ended, the results were economic crisis and right is commendable, but you win no disciples political decay. In this important addition to unless you are convincing too. A funeral notice the literature on political economy, Karl should arrive on an engraved card, not a Post-it. explains why sudden riches pushed the poli- —James M. Morris cymakers of these strikingly different nations toward the same unwise choices. THE PARADOX OF PLENTY: A wealth of natural resources, the author Oil Booms and Petro-States. suggests, can enfeeble a nation’s institutions By Terry Lynn Karl. Univ. of California and ultimately bring about economic decline. Press. 360 pp. $55 ($22, paper) Conversely, some of today’s newly industrial- In Frank Herbert’s science-fiction classic ized nations, especially those in Asia, may have Dune (1965), whoever controls the spice—the had success in part because they lacked natural desert planet’s most valuable commodity— resources: “The need to overcome this poverty controls everything. Karl, a political scientist at may have been one of the chief catalysts for Stanford University, would disagree.
    [Show full text]
  • Gay Community, Gay Identity and the Translated Text Keith Harvey
    Document generated on 09/29/2021 2:10 p.m. TTR Traduction, terminologie, re?daction Gay Community, Gay Identity and the Translated Text Keith Harvey Idéologie et traduction Article abstract Ideology and Translation Gay Community, Gay Identity and the Translated Text — In this paper, the Volume 13, Number 1, 1er semestre 2000 author explores the multiple intersections of the notion "gay community" and "gay identity" with the problematic of translation. First, the notions of URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/037397ar "community" and "identity" themselves are explored for their theoretical, DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/037397ar political and personal ramifications for the gay subject. It is argued that the two notions engage in a constant process of redefinition in relation to each other and, in particular, that they can be seen to overlap if their respective See table of contents concrete/imagined and internal/external dimensions are taken account of. The author goes on to suggest how translated literature represents a crucial site for the gay person's elaboration of a distinct subjectivity. Then, an example Publisher(s) (Spanish-English) is given of a text whose exploration of emerging gay selfhoof is enhanced in translation. Finally, a passage (English-French) is studied in its Association canadienne de traductologie source and target versions in order to identify the pressures that different cultural conceptions of sexual identity bring to bear upon textual products. ISSN 0835-8443 (print) 1708-2188 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Harvey, K. (2000). Gay Community, Gay Identity and the Translated Text. TTR, 13(1), 137–165.
    [Show full text]