Islamic Period Settlement in the Tell Leilan Region (Northern Jazira): the Material Evidence from the 1995 Survey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Islamic Period Settlement in the Tell Leilan Region (Northern Jazira): the Material Evidence from the 1995 Survey Islamic Period Settlement in the Tell Leilan Region (Northern Jazira): The Material Evidence from the 1995 Survey Valentina Vezzoli This paper provides an initial evaluation of the settlement dynamics in the area around Tell Leilan (Northern Jazira) during the Islamic period based on the study of the ceramic material collected during the 1995 survey campaign. It concentrates on the description of ceramic groups and diagnostics, and is thus able to give a reliable dating for the Islamic period occupation in the region and allows us to trace an outline of settlement development in this rural landscape. The resulting patterns are discussed in the wider context of archaeological investigations in Northern Mesopotamia and Syria generally, and compared with data derived from textual sources which have generally provided a partial and incomplete account. Keywords: Islamic pottery, Northern Jazira, Tell Leilan Region Project Introduction undulating extent of fertile soils. In the north, the The present contribution is a part of a research plain is essentially at the piedmont of the Tur ‘Abdin project which is being carried out by a team from where the local wadi systems have their origin. In the the Ca` Foscari University of Venice, under the south the plain terminates in the marshy depression responsibility of Professor Elena Rova, in co- of the Wadi Radd, which is also fed by streams operation with the Yale University Tell Leilan originating from the Jebel Sinjar in present-day Iraq. project, directed by Professor H. Weiss. It is based The main body of the plain is composed primarily of on the study of the pottery assemblage collected reddish-brown overbank flood deposits and sands. during the 1995 survey at Tell Leilan, now stored at Geomorphological work undertaken as part of the the Department of Sciences of Antiquity and of Tell Leilan project has included both a soil survey Near East (Ca` Foscari University of Venice), with a and exploration of regional hydrology in order to particular focus on the material of the Islamic characterize land-use potential (Besonen and period. The analysis of this assemblage allows us to Cremaschi 2002). It was possible to establish a make some preliminary remarks concerning the definite north-south landscape division based upon nature of human settlement in Northern Jazira differences in hydrology. Precipitation is highest in between the Early Islamic (7th–8th centuries AD) the north (c. 440 mm at present) due to the and the end of Ottoman period (19th century AD). orographic effect of the hills of the Tur ‘Abdin, but The article is based upon the writer’s MA thesis, rapidly decreases to 220 mm in the Wadi Radd basin L’insediamento di epoca islamica nell’area di Tell (Courty and Weiss 1997, 112). In the north, soils are Leilan (Jazira settentrionale): studio del materiale calcic (red and brown Mediterranean soils), while ceramico (Vezzoli 2003–04). those to the south are gypsic. The geology of Northern Mesopotamia and The Tell Leilan Region microenvironmental differences in hydrology, soil The site of Tell Leilan is located in North-east Syria, type and precipitation, influence the fertility of this in the northern half of the Khabur plain, an area (Ristvet 2005, 45–46). In antiquity and in the middle ages the region was a centre for extensive wheat and barley cultivation and it currently pro- Valentina Vezzoli, Ca` Foscari University of Venice, Department of duces one quarter of Syria’s annual cereal crop, Eurasian Studies, Ca` Cappello San Polo 2035, Venezia, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] without the aid of irrigation. ß Council for British Research in the Levant 2008 Published by Maney DOI 10.1179/175638008X348052 Levant 2008 VOL 40 NO 2 185 Vezzoli Islamic Period Settlement in the Tell Leilan Region Archaeological Data and Written Sources: Two Abbasid road (Fiey 1964, 107–17) nameley: Ra’s Distinct Voices al-‘Ayn, Balad, Ba’aynatha, Barqa’id, Adhrama and Textual and archaeological sources provide different, Bajadda (Yaqut 1977; Al-Muqaddasi 1967; Ibn at times contrasting, information concerning the Hawqal 1964). Some of these centres have now been history of human settlement in this part of the identified with modern villages or towns. At the Jazira during the Islamic period. The documentary beginning of the 20th century Adhrama was tenta- sources generally present a partial description of the tively identified with Tell Leilan. This however is area. Arab authors of the Islamic period have mainly unlikely, as little evidence of Islamic period occupa- commented upon the most important sites of North tion has been found at the site. However, working on Syria, such as al-Raqqa or Tell Sheikh Hasan, which the distances between the different stations, it is were once interregional centres (Bartl 1993–94, 30), nevertheless possible that Adhrama was located in or regional centres like Ra’s al-‘Ayn and Qarqisiya. the region around Leilan. Except for those centres However, they provide little information on small located along the Abbasid road, settlements in the centres and villages; the area surveyed around Tell Tell Leilan region, the Khabur Valley in general, are Leilan is a case in point. The kind of information we not usually mentioned by the Islamic sources, can extract from texts refers mainly to important presumably because of the lack of major centres in historical events, or to geographical descriptions. the area. While in the latter case they provide a quite useful The Arabic-language historical and geographical overview of cultivation practices and the landscape of literature — for example, Ibn Khurradadhbih’s Kitab the Jazira, they do not allow us to tackle the al-masalik wa al-mamalik (1967); al-Hamdani’s Sifat problematic issue of the dynamics of rural settlement Jazirat al-‘Arab (1968), Ibn Hawqal and the Kitab at different points within the Islamic period (e.g. the ahsan al-taqasim fi ma‘rifat al-aqalim of al-Muqaddasi impact upon rural communities of changes in rulers, (1967), the Tuhfat al-nuzzar fi ghara’ib al-amsar by the relationships between villages and central autho- Ibn Battuta (1957) and Yaqut’s Mu‘jam al-buldan rities, even the size and the location of smaller (1977) — provides information about the adminis- settlements). At times documentary sources provide a trative structure of the caliphate, agricultural produc- distorted vision of reality, because they often tion and the main centres of the Jazira. However, its represent the concerns of dominant political groups. value for the reconstruction of the historical and For these reasons it is necessary to integrate the geographical context of this peripheral area is limited. evidence of documentary sources with archaeological Medieval geographers do, however, provide a general data that can provide evidence relating to Islamic description of the rural landscape of North Jazira. period settlement. Ibn Shaddad (1964, 44), writing in the 13th century AD, provides a list of regional products such as wheat The Historical and Geographical Context Based on Textual (qumh), rice (aruzz), sesame (simsim), grapes (a‘nab), Evidence cotton (qutn) and sugar cane (qasb as-sukkar). It is necessary at this point to offer brief, critical According to such sources, North Mesopotamia account of the documentary evidence examined in the was a rich agricultural land, but a difficult political course of this project. Two different types of written situation and the presence of tribal groups rendered sources can be identified: its role somewhat peripheral. The period between the 10th and 11th centuries AD a. primary Arabic-language sources from medieval was marked by political instability caused by stronger authors; particularistic tendencies in the area of North Syrian/ b. the secondary sources from Europeans travellers North Mesopotamian. This fact at least partially who visited Syria at the beginning of the 19th explains the apparent decrease in settlement activity. century and who attempted to reconstruct the During the Ayyubid period (12th–late 13th centuries historical topography of this region. AD) and the subsequent rule of the Mamluks, from The Khabur Valley formed an important connection late 13th century AD to the second half of the 14th between west Syria and Southern Mesopotamia. In century AD, the area witnessed a period of political the Islamic period the area was traversed by the stability and economic development. While medieval Euphrates trade route (Fig. 1) which connected authors suggest that the Jazira was completely Aleppo to Mosul across the North Mesopotamian destroyed by a Mongol invasion in 1260 AD, the plateau (Ra’s al-‘Ayn). Yaqut and other medieval archaeological evidence does not appear to confirm geographers mention centres located along the this situation (see below). 186 Levant 2008 VOL 40 NO 2 Vezzoli Islamic Period Settlement in the Tell Leilan Region Figure 1 The area of the 1995 Survey at Tell Leilan and main trade routes of Northern Mesopotamia The situation worsened after the 14th century AD. tribes. When the first European travellers visited this By the fall of the Mamluk dynasty, the region was region, in the 18th century AD, it was recorded as a overrun by tribal groups, who threatened the steppe or deserted area intermittently occupied by security of commercial traffic and agriculture. The Kurds, Arabs and Yezidis. Although largely unin- tension caused by the rival tribal groups was one habited in the 19th century, North Jazira is today reason for a marked reduction in sedentary commu- populated by a sprinkling of villages, the inhabitants nities, a point confirmed by both written sources and of which can claim either Arabic and/or Kurdish as archaeological evidence. This same is true for the their mother tongue, a development that is due in entire Ottoman period, as Ottoman rulers were part to the agrarian reforms of the earlier 20th unable to reach a political agreement with the local century.
Recommended publications
  • Village Level Production and Exchange in an Early State
    The Village Larder: Village Level Production and Exchange in an Early State Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Klucas, Eric Eugene, 1957- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 21:26:36 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565574 THE VILLAGE LARDER: VILLAGE LEVEL PRODUCTION AND EXCHANGE IN AN EARLY STATE by Eric Eugene Klueas A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 9 6 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA ® GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Final Examination Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by____ Eric Eugene Klucas______ entitled The Village Larder: Village Level Production and Exchange in an Early State _______ ~__________ ________ and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy__________ Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate's submission of the final copy of the dissertation to the Graduate College, I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement• 9y/7/f6 Dissertation Director Date 7 3 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library.
    [Show full text]
  • The Syrian Orthodox Church and Its Ancient Aramaic Heritage, I-Iii (Rome, 2001)
    Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies 5:1, 63-112 © 2002 by Beth Mardutho: The Syriac Institute SOME BASIC ANNOTATION TO THE HIDDEN PEARL: THE SYRIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH AND ITS ANCIENT ARAMAIC HERITAGE, I-III (ROME, 2001) SEBASTIAN P. BROCK UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD [1] The three volumes, entitled The Hidden Pearl. The Syrian Orthodox Church and its Ancient Aramaic Heritage, published by TransWorld Film Italia in 2001, were commisioned to accompany three documentaries. The connecting thread throughout the three millennia that are covered is the Aramaic language with its various dialects, though the emphasis is always on the users of the language, rather than the language itself. Since the documentaries were commissioned by the Syrian Orthodox community, part of the third volume focuses on developments specific to them, but elsewhere the aim has been to be inclusive, not only of the other Syriac Churches, but also of other communities using Aramaic, both in the past and, to some extent at least, in the present. [2] The volumes were written with a non-specialist audience in mind and so there are no footnotes; since, however, some of the inscriptions and manuscripts etc. which are referred to may not always be readily identifiable to scholars, the opportunity has been taken to benefit from the hospitality of Hugoye in order to provide some basic annotation, in addition to the section “For Further Reading” at the end of each volume. Needless to say, in providing this annotation no attempt has been made to provide a proper 63 64 Sebastian P. Brock bibliography to all the different topics covered; rather, the aim is simply to provide specific references for some of the more obscure items.
    [Show full text]
  • AIA Bulletin, Fiscal Year 2005
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA A I A B U L L E T I N Volume 96 Fiscal Year 2005 AIA BULLETIN, Fiscal Year 2005 Table of Contents GOVERNING BOARD Governing Board . 3 AWARD CITATIONS Gold Medal Award for Distinguished Archaeological Achievement . 4 Pomerance Award for Scientific Contributions to Archaeology . 5 Martha and Artemis Joukowsky Distinguished Service Award . 6 James R . Wiseman Book Award . 6 Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching Award . 7 Conservation and Heritage Management Award . 8 Outstanding Public Service Award . 8 ANNUAL REPORTS Report of the President . 10 Report of the First Vice President . 12 Report of the Vice President for Professional Responsibilities . 13 Report of the Vice President for Publications . 15 Report of the Vice President for Societies . 16 Report of the Vice President for Education and Outreach . 17 Report of the Treasurer . 19 Report of the Editor-in-Chief, American Journal of Archaeology . 24 Report of the Development Committee . 26 MINUTES OF MEETINGS Executive Committee: August 13, 2004 . 28 Executive Committee: September 10, 2004 . 32 Governing Board: October 16, 2004 . 36 Executive Committee: December 8, 2004 . 44 Governing Board: January 6, 2005 . 48 nstitute of America nstitute I 126th Council: January 7, 2005 . 54 Executive Committee: February 11, 2005 . 62 Executive Committee: March 9, 2005 . 66 Executive Committee: April 12, 2005 . 69 Governing Board: April 30, 2005 . 70 R 2006 LECTURES AND PROGRAMS BE M Special Lectures . 80 TE P AIA National Lecture Program . 81 E S 96 (July 2004–June 2005) Volume BULLETIN, the Archaeological © 2006 by Copyright 2 ARCHAEOLOgic AL INStitute OF AMERic A ROLL OF SPECIAL MEMBERS .
    [Show full text]
  • Umm El-Marra and the Westward Expansion of the Mittani Empire
    UMM EL-MARRA AND THE WESTWARD EXPANSION OF THE MITTANI EMPIRE IN NORTHWESTERN SYRIA by Adam Sebastian Maskevich A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland March, 2014 © 2014 Adam Sebastian Maskevich All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT The Bronze Age occupation of Umm el-Marra, a medium-sized regional center in western Syria, lasted, with varying degrees of intensity, for more than a millennium. During this time, the communities who inhabited the site and the political regimes that ruled them left their unique marks on the built environment and material culture. This dissertation studies these phenomena during the Late Bronze Age occupation of Umm el-Marra in the mid-second millennium through a synthesis of the excavation records of the site, archaeological comparanda, textual evidence, ethnoarchaeology, and applicable theory. The Mittani Empire was the dominant power in northern Syria during the Late Bronze occupation of Umm el-Marra. Most of what is known about Mittani comes from external sources, many of whom were antagonistic and, thus, provide a biased view of the empire and its inhabitants. Through analysis of the Late Bronze Age levels at Umm el-Marra, this work provides an evaluation and exploration of the nature of everyday life in the Mittani empire. As such, it offers a new resource for understanding Mittani, in particular, and the functioning of imperial regimes in general, from the perspective of daily lived existence in households, neighborhoods, and a specific community. As communities and their constituent families change over time, they have different needs of the dwellings and landscapes they inhabit.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 89 Armenia Compiled by S.E
    Map 89 Armenia Compiled by S.E. Kroll (Iran), M. Roaf, St J. Simpson and T. Sinclair (Turkey), 1996 Introduction Turkey The Roman empire occupied parts of the area covered by the map, and from 591 nearly all of it. Moreover, irrespective of political hegemony, the Armenian and Syrian regions here were by virtue of culture and religion an extension of the Greek and Roman world. Armenia in the Roman and Late Antique periods was bounded to the west by the R. Euphrates and to the south by the Taurus mountains, apart from the upper Tigris basin (districts of Ingilene, Sophanene and Arzanene). The area to the south of the Taurus was not considered part of Armenia nor settled by Armenians, but was inhabited by Syrians. The northern edge of the map more or less coincides with the boundary of Armenia in the Roman and Late Antique periods, except towards the east, where significant districts of Armenia–the plain east of the R. Araxes and the mountainous area around Lychnitis Limne–lie within Map 88. The parts of Armenia on Map 89 consist mostly of plains separated by mountains and hills. Elevation rises from west to east, reaching about 5,000 ft in the Thospitis Limne basin. It drops, however, in the basin of Matiane Limne and the Araxes plain further north; these two areas were part of Atropatene during classical antiquity, but were counted within Armenia by the early seventh century A.D. (they are now in Iranian Azerbaijan). Despite its height and partly mountainous nature, the terrain of Armenia was capable of supporting a large and quite evenly dispersed population.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Syrian and Georgian Ecclesiastical Architecture
    chapter 5 The Evidence Written in Stone: An Evaluation of the Relationship (or Not) of Syrian and Georgian Ecclesiastical Architecture Giorgi Chubinashvili and the Cult of Georgian Exceptionalism C’est précisément au début de la période de féodalité que la culture et l’art géorgiens acquirent définitivement leur propre caractère national nettement prononcé.1 Anyone seeking to become acquainted with the history of Georgian Architec- ture will soon become aware of the fact that the field is fraught with method- ological problems and has been largely static since the death of Giorgi Chu- binashvili in 1973. Chubinashvili was the dominant figure in the field through- out the Soviet era and the subject is still controlled by his students, who have failed to significantly move the discipline forward in the forty-five years since his death. Whilst Chubinashvili may be credited as the founding father of the modern disciplines of art and architectural history in Georgia and is notable for his extensive publications, in common with a number of Soviet schol- ars his output is now widely viewed as being of variable quality. Particular instances where recent research has proved Chubinashvili’s suppositions to be wrong will be discussed later in this chapter but here it is important to high- light from the outset the fact that his limitations are rooted in three particular issues. The first is that he was handicapped by working on a largely ecclesiasti- cal architectural tradition in a time and place where theological knowledge was unavailable and actively forbidden as an area of research, meaning that he could only study the monuments in a schematic manner that divorced form from function; this facilitated the development of a typology of ecclesi- astical architecture that did not question the developing ritual needs of the 1 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Syrian and Georgian Ecclesiastical Architecture
    chapter 5 The Evidence Written in Stone: An Evaluation of the Relationship (or Not) of Syrian and Georgian Ecclesiastical Architecture Giorgi Chubinashvili and the Cult of Georgian Exceptionalism C’est précisément au début de la période de féodalité que la culture et l’art géorgiens acquirent définitivement leur propre caractère national nettement prononcé.1 Anyone seeking to become acquainted with the history of Georgian Architec- ture will soon become aware of the fact that the field is fraught with method- ological problems and has been largely static since the death of Giorgi Chu- binashvili in 1973. Chubinashvili was the dominant figure in the field through- out the Soviet era and the subject is still controlled by his students, who have failed to significantly move the discipline forward in the forty-five years since his death. Whilst Chubinashvili may be credited as the founding father of the modern disciplines of art and architectural history in Georgia and is notable for his extensive publications, in common with a number of Soviet schol- ars his output is now widely viewed as being of variable quality. Particular instances where recent research has proved Chubinashvili’s suppositions to be wrong will be discussed later in this chapter but here it is important to high- light from the outset the fact that his limitations are rooted in three particular issues. The first is that he was handicapped by working on a largely ecclesiasti- cal architectural tradition in a time and place where theological knowledge was unavailable and actively forbidden as an area of research, meaning that he could only study the monuments in a schematic manner that divorced form from function; this facilitated the development of a typology of ecclesi- astical architecture that did not question the developing ritual needs of the 1 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Pappalardo Dottorato 28 Ciclo COPIA BUONA
    UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI NAPOLI “FEDERICO II” DIPARTIMENTO DI STUDI UMANISTICI SCUOLA DI DOTTORATO IN SCIENZE STORICHE , ARCHEOLOGICHE E STORICO -ARTISTICHE CORSO DI DOTTORATO IN STORIA INDIRIZZO “S TORIA ANTICA ” (XXVIII CICLO ) PROCOPIO DI CESAREA E LE REALT À INSEDIATIVE TRA IL TIGRI E L 'EUFRATE (V-VII SEC .) DOTTORANDA TUTOR RAFFAELLA PAPPALARDO PROF .SSA RAFFAELLA PIEROBON a.a. 2015-2016 1 Indice Introduzione ............................................................................... 3 Capitolo 1 Il De Aedificiis di Procopio di Cesarea 1.1 Procopio di Cesarea ............................................................................ 7 1.2 Le opere ................................................................................... 8 1.3 De Aedificiis , Περ ì κτισμάτων ........... ..................................................... 10 1.4 1.4 Procopio: il carattere e la formazione nel De Aedificiis ........................14 1.5 Il II libro del De Aedificiis , la Mesopotamia e le guerre persiane...............15 Capitolo 2: Il limes bizantino/ persiano tra la fine del IV e il VI secolo d. C. 2.1 Il limes .......................................................................................................17 2.2 La Mesopotamia........................................................................................19 2.3 La Sophanene............................................................................................20 Capitolo 3: Dara: il baluardo bizantino sulla frontiera persiana 3.1: Introduzione............................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Patterns and Cultural Interactions in Northern Mesopotamia 2Nd – 4Th Century Ce
    SETTLEMENT PATTERNS AND CULTURAL INTERACTIONS IN NORTHERN MESOPOTAMIA 2ND – 4TH CENTURY CE Rocco Palermo 2 [SETTLEMENT PATTERNS AND CULTURAL INTERACTIONS IN NORTHERN MESOPOTAMIA] UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI NAPOLI FEDERICO II DIPARTIMENTO DI STUDI UMANISTICI SCUOLA DI DOTTORATO IN SCIENZE STORICHE, ARCHEOLOGICHE E STORICO-ARTISTICHE CORSO DI DOTTORATO IN STORIA INDIRIZZO STORIA ANTICA (XXV CICLO) SETTLEMENT PATTERNS AND CULTURAL INTERACTIONS IN NORTHERN MESOPOTAMIA (2ND – 4TH CENTURY CE) DOTTORANDO TUTOR ROCCO PALERMO PROF. R.PIEROBON A.A. 2011-2012 [SETTLEMENT PATTERNS AND CULTURAL INTERACTIONS IN NORTHERN MESOPOTAMIA] 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................... 7 ANCIENT SOURCES ............................................................................................................ 9 ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................... 12 FOREWORD ......................................................................................................................... 13 CHAPTER 1 .......................................................................................................................... 21 GEOGRAPHIC AND CLIMATE ....................................................................................... 21 1.1 MAJOR CENTRES AND RURAL LANDSCAPE IN MODERN TIMES ..................................... 26 1.2 HUMAN GEOGRAPHY ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gaziantep Üniversitesi Ayıntâb Araştırmaları Dergisi
    GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ AYINTÂB ARAŞTIRMALARI DERGİSİ Hedef ve Kapsam Ayıntâb Araştırmaları Dergisi (AAD) yılda iki sayı çıkar ve çifte-kör hakemlik sürecinden geçen bilimsel makalelerin yayınlandığı uluslararası ve hakemli bir akademik dergidir. Ayıntâb Araştırmaları Dergisi (AAD), Türkiye'nin önde gelen araştırma üniversitelerinden biri olan Gaziantep Üniversitesi tarafından yayınlanmaktadır. Derginin amacı teorik ve araştırma odaklı çalışmaları desteklemek, araştırmalarda kaliteyi arttırmak ve ulusal ve uluslararası akademik araştırmaların karşılıklı paylaşımını teşvik etmektir. Ayıntâb Araştırmaları Dergisi (AAD), bilginin serbest dolaşımı ve yaygınlaştırılması için çalışan açık erişimli bir dergidir. Ayıntâb Araştırmaları Dergisi (AAD) büyük oranda akademisyenlerin katkı sağladığı çok disiplinli bir yayın olmasına rağmen, alanında uzman olan veya lisansüstü düzeyde çalışmalar yapan öğrencilerden gelen yayınları da teşvik etmektedir. Derginin yayın dili Türkçe ve İngilizce’dir. Ayıntâb Araştırmaları Dergisi (AAD), Arkeoloji, Gastronomi, İşletme, İktisat, İletişim, Coğrafya, Tarih, Uluslararası Ticaret ve Lojistik, Hukuk, Dilbilim, Folklor, Edebiyat, Felsefe ve Sosyoloji alanlarından yayın kabul etmektedir. Ayıntâb Araştırmaları Dergisi'nde, sadece Gaziantep ve yöresi ile ilgili makaleler yayımlanır. Derginin uluslararası yayın kurulu vardır. Telif Hakkı Derginin tüm telif hakkı dergi yöneticilerine aittir. İletişim GAÜN Ayıntâb Araştırmaları Dergisi (AAD) Gaziantep Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Tarih Bölümü 27310 Gaziantep, TÜRKİYE Tel: +90-342-318-1820 Editör/Dergi Yöneticisi Prof. Dr. Ahmet GÜNDÜZ E-mail: [email protected] Gaziantep Üniversitesi Ayıntâb Araştırmaları Dergisi GAÜN-AAD Dergi Sahibi Gaziantep Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Ali GÜR Editor-in-Chief Prof. Dr. Ahmet GÜNDÜZ Bölüm Editörleri Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Mehmet BİÇİCİ Doç.Dr. Mehmet Emin SÖNMEZ Yrd.Doç.Dr. Meltem MUŞLU Prof.Dr. Muhammet Ruhat YAŞAR Yrd.Doç.Dr. Timur DEMİR Yrd.Doç.Dr. Selim KAYA Doç.Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/06/2021 03:57:45PM Via Free Access 86 Chapter 4 with the Palms of Both Hands Facing Outwards Towards the Viewer, Implying Benediction
    chapter 4 Symeon and His Followers: Stylitism as a Cultural Trend between Syria and Georgia The Evidence for Stylites in Georgia: A Summary of the Visual Material One key piece of evidence a number of Georgian Historians and Art Historians contend proves a tangible link between Syria and Georgia in Late Antiquity is the popularity of the cult of Symeon Stylites in the country. It is not always entirely clear whether this devotion is directed towards Symeon the Elder of Qalʿat Semʿan or his successor Symeon the Younger of the so-called ‘Miracu- lous Mountain’ in the environs of Antioch, but there is clearly a deeply rooted veneration of these saints across Georgia. However, as highlighted in the pre- vious chapter, this issue requires further exploration and cannot be accepted simply on the basis of contemporary beliefs about the past. Therefore there are a series of questions that we must consider in order to examine the veracity of these beliefs: When did the cult of Symeon Stylites enter Georgia? What evi- dence is there for the veneration of the saint(s)? Is there any archaeological or architectural evidence still extant to support Georgian assertions that stylitism became an accepted ascetic practice amongst Georgian monks in late antiquity through to the Middle Ages? With the notable exception of the medallion discussed in chapter three, the first figural representations of Symeon Stylites in Georgian art still extant date from the eleventh century and originate in very different regions of the coun- try. Perhaps the most famous Georgian depiction of Symeon is the metal icon currently on display in the Treasury of the Shalva Amiranashvili Museum of Fine Arts in Tbilisi.
    [Show full text]
  • 9781107189706 Index.Pdf
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-18970-6 — The Archaeology of Imperial Landscapes Edited by Bleda S. Düring , Tesse D. Stek Index More Information 363 INDEX Achaemenid Empire, 1 , 12 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 182 , Ayn Manawir, 92 , 93 , 95 , 102 , 103 , 310 , 316 104 , 105 Adad- nā rā rī III, 332 Azerbaijan, 176 , 182 , 185 Aequi, 156 , 158 Aztec, 4 , 314 , 315 Aesernia, 151 , 163 Aztec Empire, 311 Agamben, 183 agents of empire, 352 Balikh, 243 , 244 , 245 , 246 , 248 , 249 , 251 , 252 , agricultural development, 353 , 354 253 , 256 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 331 agriculture, 88 , 90 , 145 , 146 , 152 , 164 , 167 baptistery of Mar Yaqub, 261 Akkadian, 2 Bastam, 178 , 179 , 180 , 183 Alba Fucens, 146 , 149 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , Batabat, 187 159 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 165 , 166 , 167 Bel Temple, 250 Al- Khazir, 55 , 57 , 60 , 63 , 72 Bible, 1 Amun, 96 , 97 , 99 , 101 , 103 , 104 bioarchaeology, 176 Andes, 326 , 327 , 333 , 335 , 337 , 343 Biscione, 183 Ania, 187 Black Sea, 115 Aragatsi Berd, 181 Blemmyes, 219 , 228 Arame, 178 , 199 block survey, 125 , 127 Ararat Valley, 182 border region, 241 Araucanian polity, 176 borderland, 207 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 213 , 214 , 220 , Arbela, 51 , 57 , 74 222 , 225 , 227 Argišti, 182 , 183 , 184 , 185 , 187 , 188 borders, 241 , 242 , 243 , 244 , 246 , 248 , 251 , Armavir, 179 252 , 254 , 256 , 258 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264 Armenia, 178 , 181 , 185 , 186 , 198 , 199 Bosporan state, 117 , 137 Arṣ ini, 187 boundary, 207 , 210 , 220 , 228 , 230 artefact density, 125 Brittle Ware, 253 , 255 , 261 artefact distribution,
    [Show full text]