DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Every Voice Counts Programme Inclusive

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Every Voice Counts Programme Inclusive Every Voice Counts Programme Inclusive Governance in Fragile Settings MID TERM REVIEW REPORT BURUNDI 14 August 2018 Authors: Désiré NKURUNZIZA, Independent Consultant 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................... i ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................. v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. vii • Introduction ............................................................................................................................. vii o Program Theory of Change................................................................................................... vii • EVALUATION APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY .......................................................... vii • MAIN EVALUATION FINDINGS ........................................................................................ viii 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background EVC program ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1.1. The situation of Women in Burundi ............................................................................................. 1 1.1.1. Civil Society in Burundi ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.2. Public Authorities and Other Relevant Power Holders ................................................................. 2 1.1.3. Description of Laws and Policies Addressing Women’s Rights..................................................... 3 1.1.4. National Level Policies ................................................................................................................. 4 1.1.5. Key Influencing Moments ............................................................................................................ 5 1.2. OBJECTIF AND SCOPE OF EVALUATION ........................................................................ 5 1.3. Key components of the EVC programme .............................................................................. 6 1.3.1. Focus of EVC program in Burundi ................................................................................. 6 1.3.2. Program Theory of Change ............................................................................................. 6 1.3.3. Overall objective of the EVC Burundi Program ................................................................ 6 1.3.4. Specific objectives ................................................................................................................... 6 2. EVALUATION APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ............................................................ 7 2.1. Evaluation Design ...................................................................................................................... 7 2.2. Data collection Methodologies ................................................................................................... 7 2.2.1. Documentation review ............................................................................................................ 7 2.2.1.1.1. Quantitative data collection ............................................................................................. 7 Table 1: Distribution of Sample Interviewed during the Mid-term review per provinces........................ 8 2.2.1.2. Qualitative data collection ................................................................................................... 8 2.2.1.2.1. Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) .................................................................................. 8 Table 2: Focus groups distribution and projects concerned ........................................................... 8 i 2.2.1.2.2. Key Informant Interviews (KII) in-depth interview ....................................................... 9 2.2.1.2.3. Stories/testimonies .......................................................................................................... 9 2.2.1.2.4. Harvesting of Outcomes process .................................................................................... 9 2.3. Data analysis, report writing ....................................................................................................... 9 2.4. Ethical consideration and limitations of the Study ...................................................................... 9 3. Main findings ............................................................................................................................... 11 Socio economic characteristics of respondents .............................................................................. 11 3.1. Domain 1/Excluded groups (ref. a.1 MTR evaluation question table) (“How are excluded groups advancing towards empowering themselves and actively influencing decisions that affect their lives?” ........................... 11 3.1.1. Analysis of women and youth participation in training activities for political participation (ref. MTR question 5 “How many women and/or youth participated in the training activities for pollical participation?”) ............................................................................................................................. 11 How many woman and / or youth are more aware of their rights and responsabilities ? ........................................ 12 3.1.2.1. Vulnerable women and girls’ attitudes towards their rights ........................................... 12 3.1.4.1. to what extent do community members believe that the decision-making should be inclusive and responsive ................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 9: Analysis to what extent do community members believe that the decision-making should be inclusive and responsive ...................................................................................................................... 18 Table 7: To what extent do community members believe that the decision-making is inclusive and responsive ........................................................................................................................................... 19 3.1.5. Analysis of the support of community /local advocacy groups (Ref MTR question 7 (on community/local advocacy groups) How many and What type of Community/ local advocacy groups have been supported? .......................................................................................... 19 3.1.6. Analysis of capacities and expertise developed among community / local advocacy groups for performing political roles and implementing advocacy strategies ( Ref MTR question 8 (idem) which capacities and what expertise have been developed among community/local advocacy groups for performing political roles and implementing advocacy strategies? How many people were trained? 20 3.1.7. Types of advocacy initiatives (political participation, mobilisation, activation) carried out by community/local advocacy groups ( Ref MTR question 12 (idem) /How many and what types of advocacy initiatives (political participation, mobilisation, activation) were carried out by community/local advocacy groups? To which preliminary outcomes have these advocacy initiatives led? 20 3.1.8. In conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 21 3.2. Domain 2/CSOs (ref. a.2 MTR evaluation question table) (“How are civil society organisations advancing towards effectively influencing policies and practices on behalf of excluded groups, and towards holding authorities and other powerholders to account?”)............................................................................................. 21 ii 3.2.1. how many first and second tier partner CSOs are included in EVC ...................................... 21 3.2.2. Analysis of capacities and expertise developed among first and second tier CSos for performing political roles and implementing advocacy strategies (Ref MTR question 3 which capacities and what expertise have been developed among first and second tier CSOs for performing political roles and implementing advocacy strategies ..................................................... 22 3.2.3. How many first and second tier CSOs have demonstrated increased lobbying and advocacy skills (MTR Q2.How many first and second tier CSOs have demonstrated increased lobbying and advocacy skills ( indicator DD5) ................................................................................................................ 24 3.2.3.1. Outcomes of advocacy and lobby skills gained for CSOS .............................................. 24 3.2.4. Analysis of types of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs ( Ref MTR question 11 (a and b)How many and what types of advocacy initiatives (political participation, mobilisation, activation) were carried out by CSOs ................................................................................................ 26 3.2.5. Analysis of improvement of CSOS legitimacy to lobby and advocate for claims of societal groups (Ref MTR question 4(How) have supported CSOs improved
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Publication
    REPORT OF THE AFRICAN COMMISSION’S WORKING GROUP ON INDIGENOUS POPULATIONS/COMMUNITIES RESEARCH AND INFORMATION VISIT TO THE REPUBLIC OF BURUNDI 27 March - 9 April 2005 The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights took note of this report at its 38th Ordinary Session, 21 November - 5 December 2005 2007 AFRICAN COMMISSION INTERNATIONAL ON HUMAN AND WORK GROUP FOR PEOPLES’ RIGHTS INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS REPORT OF THE AFRICAN COMMISSION’S WORKING GROUP ON INDIGENOUS POPULATIONS/COMMUNITIES: RESEARCH AND INFORMATION VISIT TO THE REPUBLIC OF BURUNDI, MARCH - APRIL 2005 © Copyright: ACHPR and IWGIA Typesetting: Uldahl Graphix, Copenhagen, Denmark Prepress and Print: Eks/Skolens Trykkeri, Copenhagen, Denmark ISBN: 9788791563300 Distribution in North America: Transaction Publishers 390 Campus Drive / Somerset, New Jersey 08873 www.transactionpub.com African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights ( ACHPR) Kairaba Avenue - P.O.Box 673, Banjul, The Gambia Tel: +220 4377 721/4377 723 - Fax: +220 4390 764 [email protected] - www.achpr.org International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs Classensgade 11 E, DK-2100 - Copenhagen, Denmark Tel: +45 35 27 05 00 - Fax: +45 35 27 05 07 [email protected] - www.iwgia.org This report has been produced with financial support from the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 6 PREFACE ............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Burundi Parliamentary Election July 2005
    BURUNDI PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION JULY 2005 Report by Arild Stenberg NORDEM: Report 12/2005 Copyright: the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights/NORDEM and (author(s). NORDEM, the Norwegian Resource Bank for Democracy and Human Rights, is a programme of the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights (NCHR), and has as its main objective to actively promote international human rights. NORDEM is jointly administered by NCHR and the Norwegian Refugee Council. NORDEM works mainly in relation to multilateral institutions. The operative mandate of the programme is realised primarily through the recruitment and deployment of qualified Norwegian personnel to international assignments which promote democratisation and respect for human rights. The programme is responsible for the training of personnel before deployment, reporting on completed assignments, and plays a role in research related to areas of active involvement. The vast majority of assignments are channelled through the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. NORDEM Report is a series of reports documenting NORDEM activities and is published jointly by NORDEM and the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights. Series editor: Siri Skåre Series consultants: Hege Mørk, Gry Kval, Christian Boe Astrup The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher. ISSN: 1503 – 1330 ISBN/13 : 978 82 8158 007 7 ISBN/10 : 82 8158 007 0 NORDEM Report is available online at: http://www.humanrights.uio.no/forskning/publ/publikasjonsliste.html Preface With the aim of observing the legislative elections in Burundi on 4 July the European Union established an Election Observer Mission. The Head of mission was Mr Alain Hutchinson, European Parliamentarian and former Belgian member of government.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf | 954.12 Kb
    UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES Office for the Coordination of Bureau de Coordination des Humanitarian Affairs Affaires Humanitaires Affected Populations in the Great Lakes Region (31 October 2004) P.O. Box 30218 Telephone: +254 20 622 166 Nairobi, Kenya Fax: +254 20 622 632 OCHA Regional Support Office for Central and Eastern Africa AFFECTED POPULATIONS SUMMARY TOTAL AFFECTED IDPs REFUGEES POPULATION CHANGES % COUNTRY (in figures) March October March October March October 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 BURUNDI 281,638 145,033 40,971 35,000 322,609 180,033 -44.2 (-142,576) DRC 3,413,700 2,170,000 234,172 227,000 3,647,872 2,397,000 -34.3 (-,250,872) RWANDA 4,158 4,158 34,309 39,461 38,467 43,619 +13.4 (5,152) TANZANIA N/A N/A 467,306 410,429 467,306 410,429 -12.2 (-56,877) UGANDA 1,559,344 1,460,785 230,801 225,574 1,790,145 1,686,359 -5.8 (-103,786) TOTAL 5,258,840 3,779,976 1,007,559 937,464 6,266,399 4,717,440 -24.7 (-1,548,959) OCHA RSO-CEA is funded by the following donors BPRM 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The information presented in this document represents best estimates of the number of displaced, refugees and vulnerable populations throughout the Great Lakes Region. Sources of information include UN agencies, NGOs, the Red Cross family, central governments and local authorities. Internally displaced people are those who have been forced to move out of their residences and who are living dispersed in the bush, with host families or in other sites.
    [Show full text]
  • MFADC- Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Development Cooperation
    REPUBLIC OF BURUN- MFADC- Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Development Cooperation Burundi commemorates the 27th anniversary of the assassi- Dans ce numéro: page nation of President Cyprien NTARYAMIRA Burundi commemorates dians to thank the Almighty God for 27th anniversary of the assassination of Presi- 1 this gift that he had offered to Burundi, dent Cyprien NTARYA- His Excellency Cyprien NTARYA- MIRA MIRA, who, in his policy of governing The Head of State opens the country, followed the footsteps of 2 the activities of the 5th Jesus Christ, preaching peace and Edition of the National Youth Conference in love. Gitega He thanked the burundian authorities President of the Natio- for establishing the date of April 6 in nal Assembly calls on 3 memory of the late President Cyprien Christians to couple Ntaryamira, a supporter of peace, prayer with forgiveness development and discipline. Solemn opening of in- Monsignor Gervais BANSHIMIYUBU- formation and exchange seminar for newly ap- SA called on the burundians to be true 4 pointed diplomats witnesses of the resurrection of Jesus he President of the Republic, HE Christ, through the consolidation of Mr. Evariste Ndayishimiye, ac- T peace, justice and love of neighbor. Newly appointed diplo- companied by his spouse, joined other mats receive recommen- 5 The Archbishop of the Archdiocese of burundians in the commemoration of dations to follow Bujumbura congratulated the Govern- the 27th anniversary of the assassina- ment of Burundi on taking note of the tion of President Cyprien NTARYA- The Ministry in charge legacy of the late His Excellency Cy- of the interior carries MIRA, which occurred in Rwanda, on prien NTARYAMIRA in making dia- out an evaluation of its 6 April 6, 1994 with his counterpart Presi- activities for the 3rd logue a custom, with a view of stablis- dent of the Republic of Rwanda, the late quarter of the current hing lasting peace.
    [Show full text]
  • MFADC-MAGAZINE Nr 115 of 05Th March 2021
    REPUBLIC OF BURUNDI MFADC-MAGAZINE Nr 115 of 05th March Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Development Cooperation 2021 New Ambassador of the United States to Burundi: In this edition: page Towards the strengthening of cooperation ties New Ambassador of the ernment has already spoken out in United States to Burun- di: Towards the 1 favor of increased assistance through strengthening of coop- USAID”. eration ties Burundi strengthens its The Head of State His Excellency role at the regional level 2 Evariste Ndayishimiye reassured her of the availability and willingness of CNDD-FDD member the Burundian Government to give authorities called on to new impetus to development coopera- fight against corruption 2 with the utmost energy his Tuesday, March 02, 2021, the tion and diplomatic relations: “Burundi President of the Republic of Bu- T has recently acquired new institutions rundi His Excellency Evariste Nday- Visit of the Kabu 16 in the outcome of the 2020 general (20MW) hydroelectric ishimiye received in audience Madam project in Cibitoke prov- elections and the time has come for 3 ince by the Burundian Melanie Harris Higgins, new Ambassa- the mobilization of all Burundians and Prime Minister dor of the United States of America in our partners for the development of Burundi, who had come to present her our country. We are ready to reflect Burundi celebrates Letters of Credence. and identify together partnerships and African School Food 4 Day actions of mutual interest that will ben- During their exchanges, Ambassador efit our respective peoples”. Morocco and Burundi Higgins welcomed the historic ties of establish cooperation cooperation and friendship between With more than two decades of experi- roadmap for the period 6 Burundi and his country the United 2021-2024 ence in representing the United States States.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Burundian Artisanal Gold Mining Sector
    Review of the Burundian Artisanal Gold Mining Sector April 2015 By the International Peace Information Service (IPIS) Review of the Burundian Artisanal Gold Mining Sector April 2015 Editorial Review of the Burundian Artisanal Gold Mining Sector April 2015 Authorship This report was written by Ken Matthysen, researcher at the International Peace Information Service (IPIS). Acknowledgement This report was prepared by IPIS as a Contractor of Partnership Africa Canada (PAC). PAC was commissioned by the German Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR) within the German support program to the ICGLR implemented by BGR (and GIZ) funded by the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, BMZ. About this Report The present report reviews the governance framework and baseline characteristics of the Burundian artisanal gold mining sector on the background of promoting responsible engagement and management in the context of the ICGLR Regional Initiative on Natural Resources and the OECD Due Diligence Guidance. About the BGR Module of the German Support Program to the ICGLR BGR and GIZ were jointly commissioned by BMZ to implement a support program to the ICGLR, focusing on the ICGLR secretariat and associated regional bodies as well as national stakeholders in several ICGLR member states including Burundi. The BGR module runs from 2011-2016 and includes two components, namely introduction of the Analytical Fingerprint (AFP) method in the Great Lakes Region (Component I) and supporting artisanal mining sector formalization as well as the implementation of the Regional Certification Mechanism in Burundi and Rwanda (Component II) within the Regional Initiative against the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Burundi: Election Preparedness
    Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Burundi: Election preparedness DREF Operation n° MDRBI017 Glide n°: -- For DREF; Date of issue: 13 April 2020 Expected timeframe: 3 months Expected end date: 31 July 2020 Category allocated to the of the disaster or crisis: Yellow DREF allocated: CHF 180,242 Total number of people at 10,000 people based on the Number of people to 2,000 people risk: Contingency Plan scenario be assisted: Provinces at risk: 18 provinces in 5 regions Provinces targeted: 10 provinces in 5 regions Host National Society presence (n° of volunteers, staff, branches): Burundi Red Cross with 18 Branches and more than 600,000 Volunteers Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: ICRC, IFRC, Belgian Red Cross Flanders, Belgian Red Cross French, Luxembourg Red Cross, Finnish Red Cross, Norwegian Red Cross, Spanish Red Cross, IFRC and ICRC Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: Civil Department of Burundi Government, National Platform of Disaster Risk Management, UNOCHA, UNFPA A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster In line with its Constitution, every five (5) years Burundi holds national Presidential Elections. The next elections are planned to hold this year, on the 20th of May 2020. The 2020 elections in Burundi will include: Presidential, Parliamentary and Local communal leaders’ elections. With the confirmation of the election dates, the below critical dates and timelines have already been identified: • 25 February 2020 – registration of Presidential candidates • 5 March 2020 – approval of candidates by the nomination courts • 17 March 2020 – end of appeal process for disqualified candidates • 20 April to 17 May 2020 – election campaign period • 20 May 2020 – election day • 4 June 2020 – announcement of election results.
    [Show full text]
  • World Vision Burundi Multiple Crises Situation Report November 2017 Situation Highlights
    WORLD VISION BURUNDI MULTIPLE CRISES SITUATION REPORT NOVEMBER 2017 SITUATION HIGHLIGHTS 6.4 million malaria cases reported in 2017 2.6 million people are severely food insecure KEY MESSAGES • Malaria epidemic: According to the that has affected maize development. Ministry of Health, on November 12, The Fall Armyworm (FAW) infestation, 2017, the cumulative number of malaria particularly in lowland areas, may also cases reported during the first 45 weeks negatively impact maize production, but of 2017 was 6,781,916 cases with 2,980 maize constitutes only about 14 percent 2,980 deaths. In 2016, 8.2 million Burundians of Season A national cereal production. - 73 per cent of the total population - malaria deaths in 2017 were affected by malaria and more than • Malnutrition rates: Out of the 18 3,800 died. provinces in the country, 9 are classified as in Phase 2 according to the IPC Acute • Food insecurity: About 2.6 million people Malnutrition (IPC AMN) scale; Phase (27 percent of the rural population) are 2 is considered as “Alert” situation estimated to be severely food insecure requiring monitoring and strengthening 427,784 (IPC Phase 3: “Crisis” and Phase 4: of resilience based on the IPC AMN refugees have fled Burundi “Emergency”). Poor rural households are scale. They have relatively high levels in the past 3 years relying heavily on bananas, and vegetables of acute malnutrition which require that are harvested almost year-round particular attention. These provinces are to sustain their minimum food needs, Karusi, Kayanza, and Kirundo, Bubanza, RESPONSE HIGHLIGHTS amidst below-average labour incomes Bujumbura, Cankuzo, Muramvya, Mwaro and constrained purchasing power.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Burundi Comments on the UNIIB Report-A/HRC
    Republic of Burundi Comments on the UNIIB Report-A/HRC/ COMMENTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF BURUNDI ON THE REPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION ON BURUNDI (UNIIB) ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION S-24/1 OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL 1 Republic of Burundi Comments on the UNIIB Report-A/HRC/ I. INTRODUCTION 1. On 9 September 2016, a report by the UN Independent Investigation on Burundi (UNIIB) was communicated to the Republic of Burundi through its Permanent Mission in Geneva. 2. This UNIIB Report was established by three experts pursuant to resolution S- 24/1 of the Human Rights Council. In paragraph 17, the Council of Human Rights requested the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights “to urgently organize and dispatch on the most expeditious basis possible a mission by independent existing experts”. 3. Experts were tasked with " undertaking swiftly an investigation into violations and abuses of human rights with a view to preventing further deterioration of the human rights situation " and make recommendations on measures to be taken. The report covers the period from 15 April 2015 to 30 June 2016. 4. Burundi welcomes the efforts made by the United Nations for the protection of human rights in Burundi by sending experts to find out firsthand the reality on the ground. 5. Burundi regrets, however, that the allegations contained in the report of the experts do not reflect the reality on the ground and by this opportunity would like to react by shedding light on some lies conveyed by the report. 6. Burundi expresses concern about the fact that it has become a tradition that reports on it are submitted late without allowing the Government sufficient time to formulate its observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Fieldwork Report Burundi
    MIGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT: A WORLD IN MOTION Fieldwork Report Burundi: Methodology and Sampling Sonja Fransen, PhD Candidate Maastricht Graduate School of Governance, Maastricht University September 2011 1 Contact Information: Maastricht Graduate School of Governance Migration and Development Project P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands Phone: +31 43 388 4650 Fax: +31 43 388 4864 Email: [email protected] © Picture: Lisa Andersson, January 2011, Burundi 2 Acknowledgements The research team of the Migration and Development: A World in Motion project at the Maastricht Graduate School of Governance would like to express its gratitude to all the representatives of the Burundian government, international organizations, non-profit organizations and financial institutions in Burundi for their contribution to this research. Special thanks go to Development through Expert Consultancy (DeVEC), and in particular to Tom Bundervoet, Emil, Richard, and the team of enumerators for their efforts and expertise in making the fieldwork in Burundi a success. We would also like to thank l’Universite S’Agesse d’Afrique for their logistical support and UNICEF Burundi for their kindness to lend us their measuring boards and scales for the anthropometric part of the research. Project background The migration and development project in Burundi is part of the Migration and Development: A World in Motion project, financed by the Dutch ministry of Foreign Affairs (IS Academy on Migration and Development) and carried out by the Maastricht Graduate School of Governance, Maastricht University, the Netherlands. This project focuses on migration and development processes in four migrant-sending countries: Afghanistan, Burundi, Ethiopia, and Morocco. The Netherlands is chosen as the migrant-receiving country.
    [Show full text]
  • The Burundi Killings of 1972 by René Lemarchand June 2008
    The Burundi Killings of 1972 by René Lemarchand June 2008 Stable URL: http://www.massviolence.org/Article?id_article=138 PDF version: http://www.massviolence.org/PdfVersion?id_article=138 http://www.massviolence.org - ISSN 1961-9898 - Edited by Jacques Semelin The Burundi Killings of 1972 In the spring of 1972 the small (10,747 sq miles), overpopulated (7 million), poverty-stricken State of Burundi experienced massive bloodletting. Burundi’s agonies did not begin nor end with what is sometimes referred to in Burundi as ikiza, the “scourge”. Nonetheless, there is nothing in the country’s turbulent history comparable to the scale of the 1972 killings. Although the number of victims will never be known, estimates range between 150,000 to 300,000 (Kiraranganya, 1985: 76) To reduce a complicated drama to its simplest common denominator, the vast majority of those killed were of Hutu origins, representing approximately 80 per cent of a total population then numbering approximately four million; the perpetrators were drawn overwhelmingly from the Tutsi minority, accounting for some 15 per cent of the population, its representatives holding full control over the armed forces and the government. Not all Tutsi were perpetrators, however, nor were all of the victims Hutu. Hutu and Tutsi were both victims and perpetrators — but each at separate time intervals and with very different scales of involvement. The triggering factor behind the bloodbath was a Hutu-led rural insurrection aimed at seizing power from the ruling Tutsi minority. The fulcrum of the rebellion was in the southern province of Bururi, its leadership consisting of a small group of radicalized Hutu intellectuals, most of them operating from neighboring Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and Civil War in Rural Burundi
    Health and Civil War in Rural Burundi Research Working Paper 5 Tom Bundervoet, Philip Verwimp and Richard Akresh April 2008 Correct citation: Bundervoet, T., Verwimp, P. and Akresh, R. Health and Civil War in Rural Burundi. MICROCON Research Working Paper 5, Brighton: MICROCON. First published in 2008 © Tom Bundervoet, Philip Verwimp and Richard Akresh 2008 ISBN 13: 978 185864 684 7 For further information, please contact: MICROCON: A Micro Level Analysis of Violent Conflict, Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RE Tel: +44 (0)1273 872891 Email: [email protected] Web: www.microconflict.eu Funded by the European Commission’s Sixth Framework Programme 1 Health and Civil War in Rural Burundi Tom Bundervoet2, Philip Verwimp3, and Richard Akresh4 MICROCON Research Working Paper 5 April 2008 Abstract: We combine household survey data with event data on the timing and location of armed conflicts to examine the impact of Burundi’s civil war on children’s health status. The identification strategy exploits exogenous variation in the war’s timing across provinces and the exposure of children’s birth cohorts to the fighting. After controlling for province of residence, birth cohort, individual and household characteristics, and province-specific time trends, we find an additional month of war exposure decreases children’s height for age z-scores by 0.047 standard deviations compared to non-exposed children. The effect is robust to specifications exploiting alternative sources of exogenous variation. JEL codes: I12, J13, O12 Keywords: Child health, economic shocks, stunting, Africa, civil war 1 The authors would like to thank Jean-Marie Baland, Robert Bates, Tony Addison, Marcel Fafchamps, Olga Shemyakina, Peter Uvin and participants at HiCN's first annual workshop in 2006 in Berlin, at the 2006 CSAE conference, at the 2007 NEUDC, and at seminars in Namur, ECARES-ULB and DIW-Berlin for helpful comments on earlier drafts.
    [Show full text]