International Telecommunication Union

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

International Telecommunication Union Annex to ITU Operational Bulletin No. 693 - 1.VI.1999 INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION ITU-T TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU COMPLEMENT TO ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS F.69 AND F.68 LIST OF TELEX DESTINATION CODES (TDC) AND TELEX NETWORK IDENTIFICATION CODES (TNIC) (POSITION ON 31 MAY 1999) Geneva, 1999 List of Telex Destination Codes (TDC) and Telex Network Identification Codes (TNIC) Note from the TSB 1. By TSB Circular 80 of 3 June 1994, the TSB announced the approval of ITU-T Recommendation F.69 (06/94), in accordance with Resolution No. 1, Section 8, of the WTSC (Helsinki, 1993). Consequently, the TSB prepared a list of telex destination codes (TDC) and the corresponding telex network identification codes (TNIC), which are allocated in accordance with ITU -T Recommendation F.68. This list, based on Annex A to ITU -T Recommendation F.69 as published in the Blue Book (Volume II - Fascicle II.4 - pages 142 to 145), incorporates the changes of codes or designations of names of countries/geographical areas already announced in the ITU Operational Bulletins over the past few years and was published as Annex to Operational Bulletin No. 590 of 15 February 1995. 2. The new List annexed to Operational Bulletin No. 693 of 1 June 1999, replaces that published in Annex to Operational Bulletin No. 590 of 15 February 1995. It incorporates the 15 Amendments published in ITU Operational Bulletins from No. 592 of 15.III.1995 to No. 692 of 15.V.1999. In addition, the two-letter telegram network codes, referring to paragraph 7.3 of ITU -T Recommendation F.32 (10/95), corresponding to one-letter telex network identification codes are appended to this List. 3. In the interests of keeping the List up to date, administrations/ROAs are requested to check the accuracy of the information it contains and to inform TSB of any changes which should be made for its updating (TSB fax No. +41 22 730 5853, or telex number 421000 uit ch). Changes will be published in the following ITU Operational Bulletin as Amendments to the List. 4. Furthermore, the information contained in this Annex to the ITU Operational Bulletin No. 693 is also available on the ITU home page http://www.itu.int/itudoc/itu -t/ob-lists, and can be consulted by subscribers, by remote access. 5. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this List do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the ITU concerning the legal status of any country or geographical area, or of its authorities. Annex to ITU OB 693-E - 2 - 1.VI.1999 List of Telex Destination Codes (TDC) and Telex Network Identification Codes (TNIC) (Position on 31 May 1999) Note: – Codes with no entry have not yet been allocated. TDC TNIC Allocated to 1 2 3 100-149 Temporarily reserved for special administrative services 150-159 Temporarily reserved for special administrative services 160 X Maritime Mobile HF and MF Radiotelex 161 X Maritime Mobile HF and MF Radiotelex 162 X Maritime Mobile HF and MF Radiotelex 163 X Maritime Mobile HF and MF Radiotelex 164 X Maritime Mobile HF and MF Radiotelex 165 X Maritime Mobile HF and MF Radiotelex 166 X Maritime Mobile HF and MF Radiotelex 167 X Maritime Mobile HF and MF Radiotelex 168 X Maritime Mobile HF and MF Radiotelex 169 X Maritime Mobile HF and MF Radiotelex 170-179 Temporarily reserved for special administrative services 180-199 Temporarily reserved for special administrative services 200 UA Alaska (United States of America) 201 DR Dominican Republic (CDT) 202 DI Dominican Republic (AACR) 203 HN Haiti (Republic of) 204 QN Saint Pierre and Miquelon (Collectivité territoriale de la République française) 205 PT Puerto Rico (MCI/WUI) 206 PD Puerto Rico (AACR) 207 208 VN United States Virgin Islands 209 Puerto Rico (PRCA) 21 CA Canada 22 ME Mexico 23a) United States of America 230 UD United States of America (AT&T) 231 UT United States of America (TRT/FTC) 232 UR United States of America (MCI/WUI) 233 UB United States of America (GRAPHNET) 234 UI United States of America (AT&T) ____________ a) Block allocated to Unites States of America. Annex to ITU OB 693-E - 3 - 1.VI.1999 TDC TNIC Allocated to 1 2 3 235 United States of America (AT&T EasyLink Services Network) 236 UW United States of America (MCI/WUI) 237 UC United States of America (CCI) 238 UF United States of America (TRT/FTC) 239 UE United States of America (TELENET) 240 Puerto Rico (TRT/FTC) 241 DA Dominican Republic (MIRADOR) 242 243 244 245 246 UJ United States of America (MMR) 247 United States of America 248 United States of America 249 United States of America 25 UQ United States of America (AT&T) 26b) 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 28 CU Cuba 290 BA Bermuda 291 JA Jamaica 292 VB British Virgin Islands 293 CP Cayman Islands 294 WG Trinidad and Tobago 295 GY Guyana 296 TQ Turks and Caicos Islands ____________ b) Previously allocated to Canada (see ITU Operational Bulletin No. 581 of 1.X.1994). Annex to ITU OB 693-E - 4 - 1.VI.1999 TDC TNIC Allocated to 1 2 3 297 BS Bahamas (Commonwealth of the) 298 MR Martinique (French Department of) 299 GL Guadeloupe (French Department of) 300 FG Guiana (French Department of) 301 302 303 AW Aruba 304 SN Suriname (Republic of) 305 PY Paraguay (Republic of) 306 FK Falkland Islands (Malvinas) 307 308 ED Ecuador 309 BV Bolivia (Republic of) (ENTEL) 31 VE Venezuela (Republic of) (CANTV) 32 UY Uruguay (Eastern Republic of) 33 AR Argentine Republic 34c) Chile 340 341 342 CL Chile (TELEX CHILE) 343 CK Chile (VTR) 344 CZ Chile (VTR/CM) 345 CB Chile (ENTEL-CHILE) 346 CT Chile (TEXCOM) 347 348 349 35 CO Colombia (Republic of) 36 PE Peru 37 Central America (integrated code): 371 BZ Belize 372 GU Guatemala (Republic of) 373 SR El Salvador (Republic of) 374 HO Honduras (Republic of) 375 NU Nicaragua ____________ c) Block allocated to Chile. Annex to ITU OB 693-E - 5 - 1.VI.1999 TDC TNIC Allocated to 1 2 3 376 CR Costa Rica 377 378 379 PG Panama (Republic of) (INTEL) 38 BR Brazil (Federative Republic of) 390 NA Netherlands Antilles 391 LA Anguilla 392 WB Barbados 393 AK Antigua and Barbuda 394 DO Dominica (Commonwealth of) 395 GA Grenada 396 MK Montserrat 397 KC Saint Kitts and Nevis 398 LC Saint Lucia 399 VQ Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 400 401 402 LU Luxembourg 403 MT Malta (GTC) 404 P Portugal 405 GK Gibraltar 406 MW Malta (MALTACOM p.l.c.) 407 M Morocco (Kingdom of) 408 DZ Algeria (People's Democratic Republic of) 409 TN Tunisia 41 D Germany (Federal Republic of) 42 F France1) 42 MC Monaco (Principality of)1) 43 I Italy 44 NL Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 45 CH Switzerland (Confederation of)1) 45 FL Liechtenstein (Principality of)1) 46 B Belgium 47 A Austria 480 481 Annex to ITU OB 693-E - 6 - 1.VI.1999 TDC TNIC Allocated to 1 2 3 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 BN Bahrain (State of) 491 IK Iraq (Republic of) 492 SY Syrian Arab Republic 493 JO Jordan (Hashemite Kingdom of) 494 LE Lebanon 495 SJ Saudi Arabia (Kingdom of) 496 KT Kuwait (State of) 497 DH Qatar (State of) 498 ON Oman (Sultanate of) 499 500 EI Ireland 501 IS Iceland 502 FA Faroe Islands (Denmark) 503 GD Greenland (Denmark) 504 VA Vatican City State 505 SO San Marino (Republic of) 506 507 508 509 51 G United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 52 E Spain 530 531 532 533 534 535 Annex to ITU OB 693-E - 7 - 1.VI.1999 TDC TNIC Allocated to 1 2 3 536 537 EE Estonia (Republic of) 538 LV Latvia (Republic of) 539 LT Lithuania (Republic of) 54 S Sweden 55 DK Denmark 56 N Norway 57 FI Finland 580 X Maritime Mobile-Satellite Service (ava ilable) 581 X Atlantic-east satellite region, INMARSAT 582 X Pacific satellite region, INMARSAT 583 X Indian Ocean satellite region, INMARSAT 584 X Atlantic-west satellite region, INMARSAT 585 X Maritime Mobile-Satellite Service (available) 586 X Maritime Mobile-Satellite Service (available) 587 X Maritime Mobile-Satellite Service (available) 588 X Maritime Mobile-Satellite Service (available) 589 X Maritime Mobile-Satellite Service (available) 590 AD Andorra (Principality of) 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 MB The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 598 SI Slovenia (Republic of) 599 RH Croatia (Republic of) 600 BH Bosnia and Herzegovina 601 GR Greece 602 603 604 AB Albania (Republic of) 605 CY Cyprus (Republic of) 606 IL Israel (State of) 607 TR Turkey Annex to ITU OB 693-E - 8 - 1.VI.1999 TDC TNIC Allocated to 1 2 3 608 609 61 H Hungary (Republic of) 62 YU Yugoslavia (Federal Republic of) 63 PL Poland (Republic of) 64 RU Russian Federation SUd) 65 R Romania 660 661 662 663 C Czech Republic 664 665 666 SK Slovak Republic 667 668 669 67 BG Bulgaria (Republic of) 680 UX Ukraine 681 BY Belarus (Republic of) 682 MD Moldova (Republic of) 683 GI Georgia 684 AM Armenia (Republic of) 685 686 687 688 689 69e) 700 GM Guam (United States of America) (MCI/WUI) 701f) FJ Fiji (Republic of) 702 FP French Polynesia (French Overseas Territory) 703 NE Papua New Guinea ____________ d) Previously allocated to ex-USSR (see ITU Operational Bulletin No.
Recommended publications
  • ODQN 10-1.Indd
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Orbital Debris Quarterly News Volume 10, Issue 1 January 2006 Collision Avoidance Maneuver Performed by NASA’s Terra Spacecraft Inside... The Terra spacecraft, often referred to as the ignator 1983-063C, U.S. Satellite Number 14222) fl agship of NASA’s Earth Observing System (EOS), would come within 500 m of Terra on 23 October, successfully performed a small collision avoidance GSFC and SSN personnel undertook a more de- Large Area Debris maneuver on 21 October 2005 to ensure safe passage tailed assessment of the coming conjunction. Collector (LAD-C) by a piece of orbital debris two days later. This ac- The Scout debris was in an orbit with an alti- Update ........................2 tion demonstrated the effectiveness of a conjunction tude similar to that of Terra (approximately assessment procedure implemented in 2004 680 km by 710 km), but its posigrade Revision of Space by personnel of the NASA Goddard inclination of 82.4° and different orbit Shuttle Wing Leading Space Flight Center (GSFC) and the plane meant that a collision would have Edge Reinforced U.S. Space Surveillance Network occurred at a high velocity of near- (SSN). The trajectories of Terra ly 12 km/s. By 21 October Carbon-Carbon Failure and its companion EOS space- refi ned analysis of the Criteria Based on craft are frequently com- future close approach Hypervelocity Impact pared with the orbits of indicated that the miss and Arc-Jet Testing ...3 thousands of objects distance was only ap- tracked by the SSN proximately 50 m with Object Reentry to determine if an an uncertainty that Survivability Analysis accidental collision yielded a probability Tool (ORSAT) – is possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) Handbook 2018 I CONTENTS
    FOREWORD This handbook has been produced by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA), and is intended for use on ships that are: • compulsorily equipped with GMDSS radiocommunication installations in accordance with the requirements of the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea Convention 1974 (SOLAS) and Commonwealth or State government marine legislation • voluntarily equipped with GMDSS radiocommunication installations. It is the recommended textbook for candidates wishing to qualify for the Australian GMDSS General Operator’s Certificate of Proficiency. This handbook replaces the tenth edition of the GMDSS Handbook published in September 2013, and has been amended to reflect: • changes to regulations adopted by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) World Radiocommunications Conference (2015) • changes to Inmarsat services • an updated AMSA distress beacon registration form • changes to various ITU Recommendations • changes to the publications published by the ITU • developments in Man Overboard (MOB) devices • clarification of GMDSS radio log procedures • general editorial updating and improvements. Procedures outlined in the handbook are based on the ITU Radio Regulations, on radio procedures used by Australian Maritime Communications Stations and Satellite Earth Stations in the Inmarsat network. Careful observance of the procedures covered by this handbook is essential for the efficient exchange of communications in the marine radiocommunication service, particularly where safety of life at sea is concerned. Special attention should be given to those sections dealing with distress, urgency, and safety. Operators of radiocommunications equipment on vessels not equipped with GMDSS installations should refer to the Marine Radio Operators Handbook published by the Australian Maritime College, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia. No provision of this handbook or the ITU Radio Regulations prevents the use, by a ship in distress, of any means at its disposal to attract attention, make known its position and obtain help.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Analysis of Inmarsat and Iridium Aeronautical Services in the Same Oceanic Airspace
    E.F.C.LaBerge Senior Fellow, Honeywell CNS RTC June 18, 2008 [email protected] Updated Analysis of Inmarsat and Iridium Aeronautical Services in the Same Oceanic Airspace. 1 IEEE/AIAA 26th DASC, October 2007, Paper 213 EFC LaBerge & D. Zeng Purpose and Scope of the Analysis • Investigate Iridium AMSS/AMS(R)S and Inmarsat AMSS/AMS(R)S on separate aircraft in the same oceanic airspace • Analysis is limited to Oceanic Airspace structured following DO-306 guidelines, since FANS-1/A datalink Air Traffic Service (ATS) has widespread approval for operations in oceanic airspace • Conclusions are not applicable to other operational scenarios or airspace, including: - Polar, continental enroute, terminal, approach, and airport surface airspace as defined in Eurocontrol/FAA COCR document; - Simultaneous independent operation of Iridium and Inmarsat AESes on the same aircraft; and - All non-aeronautical terminals and non-aeronautical services 2 Released to ICAO ACP WGM June 18, 2008 Conclusions • The probability of Inmarsat AMSS/AMS(R)S causing a service interruption that would affect the availability of Iridium AMSS/AMS(R)S operating on separate aircraft in oceanic airspace is very small • In oceanic airspace, Inmarsat AMSS/AMS(R)S out of band emissions from one aircraft do not cause harmful interference to Iridium AMSS/AMS(R)S on another aircraft: - The functioning of Iridium AMSS/AMS(R)S is not endangered; - No serious degradation, obstruction or repeated interruption of the operation of Iridium AMSS/AMS(R)S 3 Released to ICAO ACP WGM June 18, 2008 Full disclosure, etc. • This work was based on the volumetric interference approach briefed to AMCP WGA in 1998-2000… • …and supported by Iridium, LLC (the old Iridium).
    [Show full text]
  • Is Iot the Next Industrial Satellite Communication Revolution?
    WHITEPAPER: IS IOT THE NEXT INDUSTRIAL SATELLITE COMMUNICATION REVOLUTION? By Oscar Glottmann, Spacebridge Inc. The Internet of Things (IoT) and associated expected to grow 23 percent annually, and MachineTo-Machine (M2M) connectivity of the 28 billion total devices that will be has been named the next Industrial connected by 2021, close to 16 billion will be Revolution, as it will bring major changes in IoT devices. the way all businesses, governments, and people will interact with each other, as well Other notable forecasts summed up as with the entire world. In this article, we will by Forbes(*2) on November 2016 are explore if IoT/M2M will also bring about the McKinsey’s estimates that the total IoT next Industrial Satellite Communications market size in 2015 was up to $900M, (SATCOM) Revolution. Forecasts for growth growing to $3.7B in 2020 attaining a 32.6% and expected number of IoT/M2M devices CAGR, the General Electric prediction are staggering. Just to take one example, that the Industrial Internet of Things (IoT) Ericsson Mobility Report(*1) beginning investment is expected to top $60 trillion of 2016 predicts IoT will overtake mobile during the next 15 years, and the IHS phones by 2018, and predicts that between forecast predicting that the IoT market will 2015 and 2021 the number of IoT/M2M grow from an installed base of 15.4 billion connected devices will grow 23 percent devices in 2015 to 30.7 billion devices in annually. Furthermore, Ericsson predicts 2020 and 75.4 billion in 2025. the number of IoT connected devices is Predictions are predictions, but one thing is for certain, IoT is going to be big.
    [Show full text]
  • Harnessing the Right Inmarsat Service Successfully for Your Business Manoj Mohindra, Solutions & Sales Engineering, Inmarsat Maritime
    Harnessing the Right Inmarsat Service Successfully for your Business Manoj Mohindra, Solutions & Sales Engineering, Inmarsat Maritime © Inmarsat confidential What I will cover? 1. The Maritime Product Portfolio 2. Inmarsat Adding Value 3. A look at the future of Maritime Communications First things first - INMARSAT! " ! Strong Maritime presence with 32 years of experience " ! 500,000 Global terminals •! 250,000 maritime terminals •! >30,000 FleetBroadband active installations " ! The only GMDSS provider for Maritime " ! Future secure, Alphasat & Global Xpress " ! We are the Gold Standard – for all our Markets. Inmarsat confidential 1. Maritime Product Portfolio (a) Networks / Satellites (b) Terminals (c) Unique Capability Committed to servicing User Needs Realities of today & into the future I- I- I- AlphaSat Global Xpress 4 4 4 !""#$ !""%$ !""&$ !""'$ !""($ !"")$ !""*$ !"+"$ !"++$ !"+!$ !"+#$ !"+%$ !"+&$ !"+'$ !"+($ !"+)$ " ! L-band to remain a major component of Inmarsat services Future Needs driven by requirements for: " ! A new generation of broadband MSS at Ka-band •! high bandwidth demand, •! worldwide coverage, " ! Independent from L-band •! dynamic / flexible resource mgnt. constellation, but integrated as a service offering Provide the capacity where it is needed, when it is needed! " ! Life Expectancies into late 2020’s © Inmarsat confidential a1. Existing & Evolved I-2 & I-3 Satellite Network (8) a2. Existing & Evolved (E&E) (I2 & I3 Satellites) 7 a3. Three Inmarsat BGAN I-4 Satellites F3* F2 F1 F3* 3 Satellites at 53°W, 64°E
    [Show full text]
  • Inmarsat Mini-C Mobile Earth Station
    INMARSAT MINI-C MOBILE EARTH STATION MODEL FELCOM 16 SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS WARNING CAUTION Do not open the equipment. Use the proper fuse. Hazardous voltage which can Use of a wrong fuse can result in fire or cause electrical shock, burn permanent damage to the equipment. or serious injury exists inside the equipment. Only qualified WARNING LABEL personnel should work inside A warning label is attached to the the equipment. communication unit. Do not remove the label. If the label is missing or damaged, Hazardous microwave. contact your dealer about replacement. Do not approach within 60 cm of the antenna radome WARNING Name: Warning Label (1) when it is transmitting. To avoid electrical shock, do not Type: 86-003-1011 remove cover. No user-serviceable Code No.: 100-236-741 Microwave radiation can be parts inside. harmful to the human body, particularey the eyes. Radiation Level At 10W/m 2 60 cm Do not disassemble or modify the equipment. Fire, electrical shock or serious injury can result. Turn off the power immediately if water leaks into the equipment or the equip- ment is emitting smoke or fire. Continued use of the equipment can cause fire or electrical shock. Any repair work must be done by a licensed radio technician. Improper repair work can cause electrical shock or fire. i TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD.........................................................................................................vi SYSTEM CONFIGURATION ..............................................................................viii INMARSAT C SYSTEM OVERVIEW
    [Show full text]
  • PRFP-11) & Interconnectivity Workshop 26-30 November 2019, Apia, SAMOA
    11th APT Policy and Regulation Forum for Pacific (PRFP-11) & Interconnectivity Workshop 26-30 November 2019, Apia, SAMOA Workshop Topic ENABLERS FOR A BETTER CONNECTED PACIFIC - New Satellite Technologies and Services (MSS, ESIM and LEOs) Dr Bob Horton Consultant Satellite Industry ENABLERS FOR A BETTER CONNECTED PACIFIC - New Satellite Technologies and Services (MSS and LEOs) CONTENTS • Examples of progress : MSS, ESIM – Inmarsat LEOs – OneWeb • Pacific Needs - understanding and participating in the regional/global environment - the Pacific : a “Collection of Islands” or an “Island Collective”? - opportunities overdue in APAC Inmarsat use of spectrum L band Ka band User links: 1626.5-1660.5 MHz ↑, 1525-1559 Feeder link ↑ : 27.5 – 30.0 GHz MHz↓ Feeder link↓ : 17.7 – 20.2 GHz Extended L-band: User link ↑ : 29.0 – 30.0 GHz User link↓ : 19.2 – 20.2 GHz User links: 1668-1675 MHz ↑, 1518 MHz-1525 MHz ↓ Used by Inmarsat Global Express satellites S band Used by Inmarsat-4 satellites and Alphasat Feeder link ↑ : 27.5 – 29.5 GHz Feeder link↓ : 17.7 – 19.7 GHz User link ↑ 1980-2010MHz Q/V band User link↓ : 2170-2200MHz C band 37.5-42.5 GHz ↓ Used by Europasat Feeder links for L-band satellites operate in 47.2-50.2 GHz + 50.4-51.4 GHz ↑ the bands 3550 – 3700 MHz and 6425 – - Planned for future satellites to free 6575 MHz through more than 20 Land Earth Stations up Ka-band for user terminals TT&C operated in standard C-band on most - Developmental payload on Alphasat Inmarsat satellites Inmarsat and Extended L-band Extended L-band will be available
    [Show full text]
  • High Throughput Ku-Band for Aero Applications
    WHITE PAPER High Throughput Ku-band for Aero Applications 1 Summary Recent advancements in high throughput Ku-band satellites will allow commercial Ku-band aeronautical mobile satellite systems (AMSS) to equal or exceed commercial Ka-band AMSS systems on cost and performance. The first example of this is Panasonic’s acquisition of capacity on Intelsat-29e satellite, the first satellite to use Intelsat’s Epic platform. Ku-band currently dominates the AMSS broadband market. Systems like Panasonic’s eXConnect, Row44 and Yonder provide service to the commercial market while other providers such as Tachyon and Boeing serve the government market. All of these systems use conventional continental-scale wide beams that are leased from Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) providers like Intelsat. However, in several years the dominance of Ku-band in the AMSS market will be challenged by forthcoming Ka-band systems, such as Inmarsat-5. These systems use customized satellites with multiple spot beams to offer enhanced performance over conventional wide beam Ku-band. This paper demonstrates that the key to the high throughput of Ka systems such as Inmarsat-5 is not the frequency of operation, but rather the use of spot beams. This means a Ku-band satellite using similarly sized spot beams can equal or exceed the performance of Ka-band satellites. Intelsat’s Epic platform takes full advantage of this fact. Panasonic and Intelsat have collaborated on Intelsat-29e, the first Epic satellite, to serve the needs of the AMSS market in North America and the North Atlantic – two of the densest aviation markets in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-51
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-51 FCC REPORT TO CONGRESS AS REQUIRED BY THE ORBIT ACT TENTH REPORT Adopted: June 12, 2009 Released: June 15, 2009 Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-51 FCC REPORT TO CONGRESS AS REQUIRED BY THE ORBIT ACT TENTH REPORT This report is submitted in accordance with Section 646 of the Open-Market Reorganization for the Betterment of International Telecommunications Act (the “ORBIT Act”).1 Section 646 states: (a) ANNUAL REPORTS - The President and the Commission shall report to the Committees on Commerce and International Relations of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and Foreign Relations of the Senate within 90 calendar days of the enactment of this title, and not less than annually thereafter, on the progress made to achieve the objectives and carry out the purposes and provisions of this title. Such reports shall be made available immediately to the public. (b) CONTENTS OF REPORTS - The reports submitted pursuant to subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) Progress with respect to each objective since the most recent preceding report. (2) Views of the Parties with respect to privatization. (3) Views of the industry and consumers on privatization. (4) Impact privatization has had on United States industry, United States jobs, and United States industry’s access to the global marketplace. I. Progress as to Objectives and Purposes The purpose of the ORBIT Act is “to promote a fully competitive global market for satellite communication services for the benefit of consumers and providers of satellite services and equipment by fully privatizing the intergovernmental satellite organizations, INTELSAT and Inmarsat.”2 The ORBIT Act, as originally passed in 2000: (1) mandates the privatization of INTELSAT and Inmarsat; (2) establishes criteria to ensure a pro-competitive privatization; (3) requires the Commission to determine whether INTELSAT, Inmarsat, and the INTELSAT spin-off New Skies Satellites N.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Inmarsat Plc Reports First Quarter Results 2015
    Inmarsat plc reports First Quarter Results 2015 Solid operational performance; on track for launch of third GX satellite London, UK: 6 May 2015. Inmarsat plc (LSE: ISAT.L), the leading provider of global mobile satellite communications services, today provided the following unaudited information for the three months ended 31 March 2015. First Quarter Headlines Total revenues $304.8m (Q1 2014: $344.7m) o Maritime up $1.6m to $149.8m (+1.1%) o Government down $12.7m to $66.8m (-16.0%) o Enterprise down $5.5m to $38.9m (-12.4%); underlying growth (excl. disposal) +6.9% o Aviation up $4.9m to $27.1m (+22.1%) o Revenues from LightSquared down $27.8m to $17.5m (Q1 2014: $45.3m) Wholesale Mobile Satellite Service (MSS) revenues $198.2m, up 3.5% (Q1 2014: $191.5m) Total EBITDA1 $176.8m (Q1 2014: $209.9m) Profit after tax $77.4m (Q1 2014: $100.2m) Operational Highlights I-5 F2 launched and now deployed successfully into geostationary orbit I-5 F3 shipped to Baikonur and on track for launch in early June Key voice and data services in the EMEA region transitioned successfully to Alphasat Significant progress made in Aviation contracts and S-band licensing First Inmarsat Developer Conference held, to drive growth of innovative solutions Rupert Pearce, Inmarsat’s Chief Executive Officer, commented, “This was a solid quarter of trading, although starting slowly, in particular in Maritime and certain Government contracts. However momentum developed well towards the end of the period, especially in Maritime, with strong growth in FleetBroadband subscribers and ARPU as well as XpressLink installations.
    [Show full text]
  • Inmarsat Aviation
    THE CORRECTLY CONNECTED AIRCRAFT REALISING THE FULL POTENTIAL OF THE COMPLETE CONNECTED FLEET CONTENTS THE CORRECTLY CONNECTED AIRCRAFT Realising the full potential of the complete connected fleet Introduction 04 Executive summary 06 The three ICAO data domains 08 Evaluating the features of satcom services 13 The right service for the right type of data: the correctly connected aircraft 17 The right partner for the complete connected aircraft 18 Appendix 20 02 03 INTRODUCTION: THE COMPLETE CONNECTED AIRCRAFT TRANSFORMS THE ECONOMICS OF COMMERCIAL AVIATION Michael E. Rack, Senior VP, Core Business at Inmarsat Aviation The future of connected aviation is changing. Expectations of connectivity performance are ever-increasing and, by 2035 1, more passengers will be flying each year than the number of people living on the ground right now. That’s more than 7 billion passengers. Recent research indicates that today 6 out of 10 passengers believe inflight Wi-Fi is no longer a luxury, but a necessity 2 – and we believe that proportion will be even higher in coming years. But far from being a challenge, connectivity in the operations will use the power of today’s IP-based cabin represents opportunity. Airlines are quickly flight deck connectivity to offer real-time, secure coming to the realisation that inflight broadband information and communications to airlines and opens new horizons of passenger value-creation. controllers. This will drive further efficiency gains In 2018, connected ancillary sales will be worth in flight operations and airport operations and $784m to airlines and independent research from maintenance – potentitally saving many more the London School of Economics (LSE) indicates this billions of dollars industry-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Eutelsat S.A. €800,000,000 2.000 Per Cent Bonds Due 2 October 2025 Issue Price: 99.400 Per Cent
    EUTELSAT S.A. €800,000,000 2.000 PER CENT BONDS DUE 2 OCTOBER 2025 ISSUE PRICE: 99.400 PER CENT The €800,000,000 aggregate principal amount 2.000 per cent. bonds due 2 October 2025 (the Bonds , and each a Bond ) of Eutelsat S.A. (the Issuer ) will be issued on 2 October 2018 (the Bond Issue ). Each Bond will bear interest on its principal amount at a fixed rate of 2.000 per cent. per annum from (and including) 2 October 2018 (the Issue Date ) to (but excluding) 2 October 2025, payable in Euro annually in arrears on 2 October of each year and commencing on 2 October 2019, as further described in "Terms and Conditions of the Bonds – Interest". Unless previously redeemed or purchased and cancelled in accordance with their terms and conditions, the Bonds will be redeemed at their principal amount on 2 October 2025 (the Maturity Date ). The Issuer may, at its option, and in certain circumstances shall, redeem all (but not part) of the Bonds at par plus any accrued and unpaid interest upon the occurrence of certain tax changes as further described in "Terms and Conditions of the Bonds – Redemption and Purchase – Redemption for tax reasons". The Bonds may also be redeemed (i) at the option of the Issuer, in whole or in part, at any time, prior to the Maturity Date, as further described in "Terms and Conditions of the Bonds — Redemption and Purchase — Make Whole Redemption by the Issuer", (ii) at any time prior to the Maturity Date, in whole (but not in part), at par plus accrued interest, if eighty (80) per cent.
    [Show full text]