The Mystery of William Shakespeare, a Summary of Evidence

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Mystery of William Shakespeare, a Summary of Evidence THE.Mystery of William Shakespeare A SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE BY HIS HONOUR JUDGE WEBB SOMETIME FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE REGIUS PROFESSOR OF LAWS AND PUBLIC ORATOR IN THE UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN § LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO. 39, PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON NEW YORK AND BOMBAY 1902 Printed at the By Ponsonby <i Weldrick. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFOu.,. SAINTA BARBARA \J3 PAGE Proem ...... I Of the Tzvo SJiakespcrian Problems 5 i Of the Unity of Shakespeare 19 ii Of the ScholarsJiip of Shakespeare 32 V Of the Identity of Shakespeare • 52 V Of Shakespeare and the Two Players 79 vi Of Shakespeare and Ben fonson . 103 vii Of Shakespeare as a Lazvyer 140 viii Of Shakespeare as a Alan of Science 170 ix Of certain Plays of Shakespeare • 199 X Of the Concbision of the wiiole Matter • 232 Appendix—Notes .... 251 Ijtdex ...... 283 ERRATA Page 142, note, for 'Letters of Apology'' read ' Letter of Apology \ and for^ i^G-j, 1568, 1569' read'i^<)~, 1598, and 1599'. y^;- ,, 206, 'Declarations', ;-c^(/ 'Declaration'. ,, 22!\, for 'Dick Hatteraick' read 'Dirk Hatteraick'. ,, 254,/c;- 'Wincot and Clement Parkes ', read • AVoncot and Clement Perkes'. Proem OF late years a number of valuable and interest- ing* works on the subject of Shakespeare have issued from the press. With an industry which nothing could exhaust, and a research which nothing could escape, Mr. Halliwell-Phillipps has furnished us in his Outlines with ' an authentic collection of all the known facts respecting the personal and literaryhistory of the great dramatist.' Mr. Sidney Lee, who, in his Life of ShakespearCy for the moment, has superseded Mr. Phillipps in popular regard, has given us a most interesting account of the Elizabethan Sonneteers, and has shown, in opposition to the received opinion, that the Sonnets of Shakespeare were addressed to Lord Southampton. Mr. Wyndham, amid his preoccupations as a politician, has found time to publish an edition of Shakespeare's Poems, in which he too has given us a valuable reading on B 2 Proem the Sonnets, and, differing from Mr. Lee, regards them as addressed to the young lord who was after- wards the Earl of Pembroke. Mr. Castle, one of His Majesty's Counsel, in his Study, has followed the footsteps and completed the work of Lord Campbell on the legal acquirements of Shakespeare, and has advanced a novel and ingenious theory on the subject. Mr. Justice Madden, the Vice- Chancellor of the University of Dublin, claims to have discovered the ' distinctive note ' of * the workmanship of Shakespeare,' and, in his Diary of Master William Silence^ has interwoven the Poet's allusions to Elizabethan sport in a romance which in point of interest may be compared to Queenkoo-Hall, as animated by the magic wand of Scott. And, last and not least, Mr. Swinburne, in his Study of Shakespeare has shown the laborious and elaborate revision to which the Shakespearian Plays were subjected by their author, and has for ever dispelled the notion that the great Poet was insensible to the value of his writings, and indifferent to their fate. The Critical Study of the Professor of Literature in the University of Dublin, after a lapse of thirty years, retains its popularity as an analysis of the ' Mind and Art ' of the great Dramatist ; but the works which have been mentioned justify, if the}^ do Pro em not necessitate, a reconsideration of the notions which we are accustomed to entertain of Shakespeare. Nor can we overlook the obligations under which America has laid us in the discussion of all Shake- spearian questions. Judge Holmes, Mr. Donnelly, and Mr. Reed have received but scant considera- tion from the accredited organs of opinion on this side of the Atlantic, but the services which these distinguished writers have rendered to the literature of the subject cannot be ignored. Their prede- cessors, from the time of Farmer, had confined their attention to the discovery of parallelisms between the works of Shakespeare and the works of the Ancients. The American writers, on the contrary, have directed their efforts, with remark- able success, to the discovery of parallelisms between the works of Shakespeare and the acknow- ledged works of Bacon ; and If they have not succeeded In convincing the world that Bacon and Shakespeare were really one, they have given a powerful stimulus to the study of two of the greatest men that the world has ever seen, if we are still to consider them as two. Moreover, it is not merely the question of the Identity of Shakespeare which Is Involved in the discussions which they have raised. These discussions Involve the question of his Unity, the question of the extent of his Authorship, and B 2 4 Proem above all the question whether in the received text we possess his writings ' cur'd and perfect ' of their limbs ' and absolute in their numbers as he conceived them.' In spite of all that has been written, there is a vague feeling of unrest as to Shakespeare in the public mind ; and a new study on the subject may, perhaps, be welcomed. Whoever the great dramatist was, we can form no adequate concep- tion of his mind ; but what Lord Rosebery says of Napoleon is equally true of Shakespeare. Man- kind will always delight to scrutinise something that indefinitely raises its conceptions of its own powers and possibilities, and will seek, though eternally in vain, to penetrate the secret of this. prodigious intellect. Of the Two Shakespearian Problems is strange that, in discussing- Shakespearian IT questions, we must commence with the discus- sion of a name. In the time of Elizabeth, the name Shakespeare, under which the Shakespearian works were published, was to be found, as Mr. Phillipps tells us, in every part of England. In Warwick- shire, as appears from contemporary records, the name was spelt in some twenty or thirty different ways, all of them, however, pronounced as Shaxpere —a form which it frequently assumed. In the case of the Stratford family the name ultimately crystallised into Shakspere. This is shown by the extracts from the Stratford Register, which Mr. Phillipps has given in his Outlines {\\. 51), and by the facsimiles with which Mr. Lee has ornamented the Library Edition of his Life. The Parish Register of Stratford contains an entry of every event in the domestic life of its famous townsman, and his name appears as Shakspere in the entries of his bap- tism (p. 8), of the baptism of his first child (p. 21), 6 Of the Two Shakespearian Problems of the baptism of his twins (p. 23), of the burial of his only son (p. 149), of the marriage of his elder daughter (p. 216), of the marriage of his younger daughter (p. 219), and of the burial of himself (p. 221). As every one knows, the only specimens of his handwriting that we possess are the two signatures to the deeds which he executed in 16 1 2, the three signatures to the will which he executed in 1616, and the words * By me,' with which the will is vouched. The three signatures to the will are all but undecipherable, and three different opinions have been expressed as to what they reall}^ are ; but there can be no difference of opinion as to the signatures of the deeds, a tran- script of which is given by Mr. Phillipps (ii. 34, 36). In the body of the deeds, and in the delivery clause of each, the grantee is described by the drafts- man as Williain Shakespeare, but when the grantee comes to execute the instruments he does not recognise that form of the name, but signs him- self William Shakspere. To this spelling, accord- ing to Mr. Hallam, there are no exceptions in his autographs, and Mr. Spedding, in his observations on the Northumberland Papers, gives expression to the same opinion. Accordingly, Mr. Coleridge, Professor Dowden, and Mr. Boas adopt the spelling of the owner of the name, while Mr. Swinburne ' * rejects the new Shakspere ' as .r? novics hoiiio^ with whom he has no desire to be acquainted (p. 256). It may be thought that as long as we ; Of the Two Shakespearian Problems 7 have the Sonnets, the Poems, and the Plays of Shakespeare, it Is idle to dispute about a name but here the dispute about the name involves a dispute about the man. The Legitimist spells an equally famous name as BtLonaparte to intimate that Napoleon was an Italian, while the Imperialist spell it Bonaparte to indicate that he was French ; and in a somewhat similar way there is a school of critics who employ the word Shakspere to designate the Stratford Player, and reserve the word Shake- speare to designate the eminent person whom they regard as the Author of the Plays. The world has refused to make any such dis- tinction. For well nigh three hundred years it has identified the Player with the Playwright. The feel- ing with which he is regarded has been consecrated by authority, and has become venerable by the lapse of time. Admiration has risen to reverence, and reverence has been exalted into worship, and the Shakspere cult has overspread the world. Stratford- on-Avon has been converted into a literary Mecca, and thirty thousand pilgrims annually visit its Parish Church as their Caaba. And yet it is wonderful how little we know of the man we venerate so much ; Mr. Hallam., indeed, In his History of Literature, declares that we know scarcely anything at all. From his baptism In 1564 to his marriage in 1582 we have no record of his existence.
Recommended publications
  • The Tragedy of Hamlet
    THE TRAGEDY OF HAMLET THE WORKS OF SHAKESPEARE THE TRAGEDY OF HAMLET EDITED BY EDWARD DOWDEN n METHUEN AND CO. 36 ESSEX STREET: STRAND LONDON 1899 9 5 7 7 95 —— CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ix The Tragedy of Hamlet i Appendix I. The "Travelling" of the Players. 229 Appendix II.— Some Passages from the Quarto of 1603 231 Appendix III. Addenda 235 INTRODUCTION This edition of Hamlet aims in the first place at giving a trustworthy text. Secondly, it attempts to exhibit the variations from that text which are found in the primary sources—the Quarto of 1604 and the Folio of 1623 — in so far as those variations are of importance towards the ascertainment of the text. Every variation is not recorded, but I have chosen to err on the side of excess rather than on that of defect. Readings from the Quarto of 1603 are occa- sionally given, and also from the later Quartos and Folios, but to record such readings is not a part of the design of this edition. 1 The letter Q means Quarto 604 ; F means Folio 1623. The dates of the later Quartos are as follows: —Q 3, 1605 161 1 undated 6, For ; Q 4, ; Q 5, ; Q 1637. my few references to these later Quartos I have trusted the Cambridge Shakespeare and Furness's edition of Hamlet. Thirdly, it gives explanatory notes. Here it is inevitable that my task should in the main be that of selection and condensation. But, gleaning after the gleaners, I have perhaps brought together a slender sheaf.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespearean Tragedy's
    SHAKESPEAREAN TRAGEDY’S SHAKESPEAREAN TRAGEDY’S: A CRITICAL STUDY Rameshsingh M.Chauhan Assistant Professor, ISSN 2277-7733 Sardar Vallabhbhai Vanijya Mahavidyalaya, Ahmedabad Volume 6 Issue 4, March 2018 Abstract Shakespearean say that tragedy is nothing but a sad play is not accurate the plays often involve the fall of noble stature. The character always has a fatal that leads to their downfall. Their downfall is usually set into motion by external forces that the characters have little or no control over. The tragedies are also characterized by a great deal of death. The tone is usually very somber from the onset of the play. The plays are meant to examine human nature. The elements below can be found in Shakespeare tragedies, how well do they match the play know? They end with the death of the tragic heroes. The deaths of the heroes have a big impact on the people around them. And the larger community other person dies as part of the tragic chain of events. The heroes reach a pack in the day of happiness or achievement. Macbeth becomes King Romeo and Juliet get married. This usually happens about through. After this peak, there is a peripateia where events take a terrible turn for the worse. The heroes are in some part responsible for this change of fortunes. The paper critically analyses the Shakespearean tragedy. Key words: criticism, critical study, shakespeare, tragedy William Shakespeare is the greatest English writer. He was born on April 23, 1564 in Stratford upon even Shakespeare was the most documented Elizabethan play write.
    [Show full text]
  • Poison and Revenge in Seventeenth Century English Drama
    "Revenge Should Have No Bounds": Poison and Revenge in Seventeenth Century English Drama The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Woodring, Catherine. 2015. "Revenge Should Have No Bounds": Poison and Revenge in Seventeenth Century English Drama. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17463987 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA “Revenge should have no bounds”: Poison and Revenge in Seventeenth Century English Drama A dissertation presented by Catherine L. Reedy Woodring to The Department of English in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of English Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2015 © 2015 – Catherine L. Reedy Woodring All rights reserved. Professor Stephen Greenblatt Catherine L. Reedy Woodring “Revenge should have no bounds”: Poison and Revenge in Seventeenth Century English Drama Abstract The revenge- and poison- filled tragedies of seventeenth century England astound audiences with their language of contagion and disease. Understanding poison as the force behind epidemic disease, this dissertation considers the often-overlooked connections between stage revenge and poison. Poison was not only a material substance bought from a foreign market. It was the subject of countless revisions and debates in early modern England. Above all, writers argued about poison’s role in the most harrowing epidemic disease of the period, the pestilence, as both the cause and possible cure of this seemingly contagious disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare Abridged for The
    Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare Abridged for the Shakespeare Schools Festival by Martin Lamb & Penelope Middelboe 30 MINUTE VERSION © Shakespeare Schools Festival (SSF) “We are such stuff as dreams are made on.” Copyright of the abridged scripts rest with Shakespeare Schools Festival charity. Your registration fee only allows you to perform the abridgement during the current Festival. You may not share the script with other schools, or download all the scripts for personal use. A public performance of the SSF abridged script must be premiered at the professional SSF theatre. 1 LIST OF ROLES Prince Escalus PRINCE OF VERONA Paris A YOUNG COUNT Montague HEAD OF THE HOUSE OF MONTAGUE Capulet HEAD OF THE HOUSE OF CAPULET Romeo MONTAGUE’S SON Mercutio KINSMAN TO THE PRINCE, FRIEND TO ROMEO Benvolio NEPHEW TO MONTAGUE, FRIEND TO ROMEO Tybalt NEPHEW TO LADY CAPULET Juliet DAUGHTER TO CAPULET Nurse to Juliet Lady Montague WIFE TO MONTAGUE Lady Capulet WIFE TO CAPULET Friar Lawrence OF THE FRANCISCAN ORDER, FRIEND TO ROMEO Friar John OF THE FRANCISCAN ORDER Balthazar SERVANT TO ROMEO Sampson SERVANTS TO CAPULET & Gregory Abraham SERVANT TO MONTAGUE An Apothecary Citizens, Revellers And Others 2 PROLOGUE CHORUS Two households both alike in dignity, In fair Verona where we lay our scene From ancient grudge, break to new mutiny, Where civil blood makes civil hands unclean: From forth the fatal loins of these two foes, A pair of star crossed lovers take their life: Whose misadventured piteous overthrows, Doth with their death bury their parents’ strife. SCENE 1 A street ENTER SAMPSON and GREGORY of the house of Capulet, in conversation.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Notes
    Background Notes William Shakespeare and Romeo and Juliet Shakespeare: A brief biography • Shakespeare was born on April 23, 1564 in Stratford-on-Avon, England to an upper/ middle class family. Shakespeare: A brief biography • He learned Latin and Greek history in his grammar school as a child. This would explain the Latin and Greek references in his works. • There is not evidence that Shakespeare continued his schooling after elementary school. Shakespeare: A Brief Biography In 1582 at the age of 18, he married Anne Hathaway who was 26. She was pregnant before they were married. Shakespeare: A Brief Biography • After a few years of marriage, Shakespeare left Stratford-on-Avon and his family for London to pursue his career in acting and writing. Shakespeare: A Brief Biography • Shakespeare wrote and acted with The Lord Chamberlain’s Men. This was an acting troupe that would perform during Shakespeare’s time. Shakespeare: A Brief Biography • It is believed that Shakespeare died on April 23, 1616. • In his will, Shakespeare left his daughters the majority of his wealth and possessions. He left his wife his “second best bed”. Shakespeare: A Brief Biography • The inscription on his tomb states: "Good friend for Jesus sake forbeare, To dig the dust enclosed here. Blessed be the man that spares these stones, And cursed be he that moves my bones.” Shakespeare wrote this because in his time, old bodies were dug up and burned to make room for new burials. Shakespeare despised this treatment of bodies, so he wrote this. Romeo and Juliet and Elizabethan Theater • Shakespeare did not create the story of Romeo and Juliet.
    [Show full text]
  • William Shakespeare - Poems
    Classic Poetry Series William Shakespeare - poems - Publication Date: 2012 Publisher: Poemhunter.com - The World's Poetry Archive William Shakespeare(26 April 1564 - 23 April 1616) an English poet and playwright, widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language and the world's pre-eminent dramatist. He is often called England's national poet and the "Bard of Avon". His surviving works, including some collaborations, consist of about 38 plays, 154 sonnets, two long narrative poems, and several other poems. His plays have been translated into every major living language and are performed more often than those of any other playwright. Shakespeare was born and raised in Stratford-upon-Avon. At the age of 18, he married Anne Hathaway, with whom he had three children: Susanna, and twins Hamnet and Judith. Between 1585 and 1592, he began a successful career in London as an actor, writer, and part owner of a playing company called the Lord Chamberlain's Men, later known as the King's Men. He appears to have retired to Stratford around 1613 at age 49, where he died three years later. Few records of Shakespeare's private life survive, and there has been considerable speculation about such matters as his physical appearance, sexuality, religious beliefs, and whether the works attributed to him were written by others. Shakespeare produced most of his known work between 1589 and 1613. His early plays were mainly comedies and histories, genres he raised to the peak of sophistication and artistry by the end of the 16th century. He then wrote mainly tragedies until about 1608, including Hamlet, King Lear, Othello, and Macbeth, considered some of the finest works in the English language.
    [Show full text]
  • TEACHING IMAGE PATTERNS in HAMLET HILARY SEMPLE, Former Lecturer at the University of the Witwatersrand
    TEACHING IMAGE PATTERNS IN HAMLET HILARY SEMPLE, former lecturer at the University of the Witwatersrand (originally published in CRUX, May 1993) In her fascinating study of Shakespeare’s imagery Caroline Spurgeon writes: The greater and richer the work the more valuable and suggestive become the images, so that in the case of Shakespeare I believe one can scarcely overrate the possibilities of what may be discovered through a systematic examination of them.' A systematic examination involving complete coverage is not possible in class or tutorial room, but many of the difficulties experienced by pupils or students in the study of Hamlet may be resolved by an analysis of some or the main image patterns in the play. First, the question, ‘what is an image?’ needs to be addressed, and the answer need not be one of great sophistication or subtlety. Many literary glossaries give the teacher a variety of definitions with which to work. The students need to grasp the fundamental idea that the dramatist creates many ‘mental pictures’ 2 in order to present ideas and concepts descriptively"3. After the group has agreed on a few working definitions of the image, pupils or students should be invited to create their own mental picture — to visualize a train travelling rapidly, kept on track, and given direction by its rails. This is to be kept in mind as a rough analogy for the movement of the play, which is kept ‘on track‘ and given direction by the image patterns created by the dramatist. In other words, the image patterns support and accompany the play’s action and plot like the rails do a train.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamlet, Prince of Denmark
    Hamlet, Prince of Denmark William Shakespeare [Collins edition] 2 ABOUT THIS E-TEXT Project Gutenberg Etext of Hamlet by Shakespeare PG has multiple editions of William Shakespeare’s Complete Works Copyright laws are changing all over the world, be sure to check the copyright laws for your country before posting these files!! Please take a look at the important information in this header. We encourage you to keep this file on your own disk, keeping an electronic path open for the next readers. Do not remove this. It must legally be the first thing seem when opening the book. In fact, our legal advisors said we can’t even change margins. Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts Etexts Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971 These Etexts Prepared By Hundreds of Volunteers and Donations Information on contacting Project Gutenberg to get Etexts, and further information is included below. We need your donations. This etext was prepared by Dianne Bean. Converted to TEX, pdf and ps by Carlos Campani, [email protected]. 3 Project Gutenberg Etexts are usually created from multiple editions, all of which are in the Public Domain in the United States, unless a copyright notice is included. Therefore, we usually do NOT keep any of these books in compliance with any particular paper edition. We are now trying to release all our books one month in advance of the official release dates, leaving time for better editing. Please note: neither this list nor its contents are final till midnight of the last day of the month of any such announcement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Characterisation in Shakespearean Comedies
    CHARACTERIZATION IN SHAKESPEAREAN COMEDIES & ITS APPLICATION Curso monográfico Literatura Inglesa “Shakespeare in Performance” Academic Year 2006/2007 By PLANNING TEAM PLANNING TEAM MEMBERS ARE: • Ayala Ruíz, ALBERTO • Ayanoglu, AYSE • Bordas del Prado, ANA ISABEL • Cabrales Morant, RAQUEL • Cantero Laserna, EDUARDO • Carbonell Rico, ALFREDO • Clares Arrimada, ÓSCAR • Onur, IPEK INDEX 0. INTRODUCTION 1. SHAKESPEAREAN COMEDY 1.1 Defining the terms “comedy” and “humour”. 1.2 Comedy conventions. 1.3 Features of the Shakespearean comedy. 1.4 Application. 2. STEREOTYPES IN SHAKESPEAREAN COMEDY 2.1 Stock characters. 2.2 Application. 3. CHARACTERIZATION 3.1 Costumes in Shakespearean plays. 3.1.1 Elizabethan clothing. 3.1.2 Men and women dress in Shakespearean plays. 3.1.2.1 Men’s garments. 3.1.2.2 Women’s garments. 3.1.3 Decoration / Materials. 3.2 Hairstyle and make-up in Shakespearean times and comedies. 3.2.1 Hairstyle in Shakespearean times and comic characters. 3.2.1.1 Men’s hairstyle. 3.2.1.2 Women’s hairstyle. 3.2.2 The importance of make-up in theatre. 3.3 Voice in Shakespearean comedies. 3.3.1 Importance of voice in Shakespearean comedies. 3.3.2 Voice and gender. 3.3.3 Talking to the audience. 3.4 Application. 4. CONCLUSION 5. REFERENCES 6. NOTES ON THE ORAL PRESENTATION 0 – INTRODUCTION The purpose of developing this paper is to witness different aspects of Shakespearean comedies. This paper is divided into three main parts: 1) Shakespearean Comedy (general definition, conventions and characteristics), 2) Stereotypes in Shakespearean comedies, and 3) Characterization (costumes, hairstyle, make-up and voices).
    [Show full text]
  • Hamlet (The New Cambridge Shakespeare, Philip Edwards Ed., 2E, 2003)
    Hamlet Prince of Denmark Edited by Philip Edwards An international team of scholars offers: . modernized, easily accessible texts • ample commentary and introductions . attention to the theatrical qualities of each play and its stage history . informative illustrations Hamlet Philip Edwards aims to bring the reader, playgoer and director of Hamlet into the closest possible contact with Shakespeare's most famous and most perplexing play. He concentrates on essentials, dealing succinctly with the huge volume of commentary and controversy which the play has provoked and offering a way forward which enables us once again to recognise its full tragic energy. The introduction and commentary reveal an author with a lively awareness of the importance of perceiving the play as a theatrical document, one which comes to life, which is completed only in performance.' Review of English Studies For this updated edition, Robert Hapgood Cover design by Paul Oldman, based has added a new section on prevailing on a draining by David Hockney, critical and performance approaches to reproduced by permission of tlie Hamlet. He discusses recent film and stage performances, actors of the Hamlet role as well as directors of the play; his account of new scholarship stresses the role of remembering and forgetting in the play, and the impact of feminist and performance studies. CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS www.cambridge.org THE NEW CAMBRIDGE SHAKESPEARE GENERAL EDITOR Brian Gibbons, University of Munster ASSOCIATE GENERAL EDITOR A. R. Braunmuller, University of California, Los Angeles From the publication of the first volumes in 1984 the General Editor of the New Cambridge Shakespeare was Philip Brockbank and the Associate General Editors were Brian Gibbons and Robin Hood.
    [Show full text]
  • Figurative Design in Hamlet the Significance of the Dumb Show
    FIGURATIVE DESIGN IN HAMLET THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DUMB SHOW LEE SHERIDAN COX OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS $8.00 FIGURATIVE DESIGN IN HAMLET The Significance of the Dumb Show By Lee Sheridan Cox Critics have long debated the significance of the dumb show in Hamlet. There is a wide divergence of opinion on the matter of its importance: to one critic, it is ''only a mechanical necessity"; to another, "the keystone to the arch of the drama." In mod­ ern performances of Hamlet, it is frequently omitted, a decision vigorously protested by some critics as detrimental to the play scene. But the presence of the dumb show in the play scene has given rise to questions that evoke little unanimity of response even among its proponents. Why does the mime directly anticipate the subject matter of The Murder of Gonzago? Does Shakespeare preview Gonzago to provide necessary in­ formation? If not, is the dumb show then superfluous? And if superfluous, was the de­ vice forced on Shakespeare, or was it merely a politic catering to popular taste? Is the show foisted on Hamlet by the visiting players? If not, how does it serve his larger plan and purpose? What is its effect on the stage audience? Does Claudius see the pan­ tomimic prefiguring of Gonzago? What does his silence during and immediately alter the show signify? The search for answers to such questions is usually confined to the play scene. But Professor Cox maintains that the true na­ ture and function of the show can be ap­ FIGURATIVE DESIGN IN HAMLET THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DUMB SHOW FIGURATIVE DESIGN IN HAMLET THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DUMB SHOW LEE SHERIDAN COX OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS Copyright © 1973 by the Ohio State University Press All Rights Reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Cox, Lee Sheridan Figurative design in Hamlet Includes bibliographical references.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare's Use of History in Escalas' Criticism
    Shakespeare’s Use of History in Escalas’ Criticism José Manuel González Fernández de Sevilla UNIVERSITAT D’ALACANT [email protected] Rafael Ballester Escalas (1916-1993) deserves to be regarded as one of the most distinguished scholars within the field of Shakespearean criticism in Spain. His contribution is mainly devoted to the study of Shakespeare’s use of history in his dramas. He was concerned with the historical dimension of Shakespeare’s plays. And the reason for his critical interest in Shakespeare’s histories lies in the fact that he, himself, was a historian who wrote books on different aspects of world history and taught Ancient History at the universities of Barcelona and Tarragona. His academic involvement in historical studies and research together with a deep knowledge of Shakespearean drama and a personal feeling for Shakespeare’s dramatic achievement led him to study the historical material of Shakespeare’s plays. His admiration for Shakespeare began early and remained one of his greatest academic interests throughout his life. His doctoral thesis on Shakespeare’s dramatic use of history was entitled El historiador William Shakespeare (ensayo sobre el espíritu del siglo XVI). He translated Julius Caesar and Coriolanus and played a minor role in Twelfth Night, taking part in the Shakespearean debates and controversies of his time.1 These activities give an accurate idea of his comprehensive experience and understanding of Shakespeare, for whom, both as a man and as a historian, he had an enduring passion. It is interesting to note how often Escalas refers to Shakespeare in his works. The Bard is always there as one of the most active and creative elements in his mind.
    [Show full text]