DOCSLIB.ORG

IS/MND for CVAG Whole Cottonseed Transload Facility Port of Stockton

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IS/MND for CVAG Whole Cottonseed Transload Facility Port of Stockton May 2020 Central Valley Ag Group Bulk Whole Cottonseed Transload Facility Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Central Valley Ag Group Bulk Whole Cottonseed Transload Facility at the Port of Stockton Prepared for the Port of Stockton May 2020 Central Valley Ag Group Bulk Whole Cottonseed Transload Facility Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Central Valley Ag Group Bulk Whole Cottonseed Transload Facility at the Port of Stockton Prepared for Prepared by Port of Stockton Anchor QEA, LLC 2201 West Washington Street 130 Battery Street, Suite 400 Stockton, California 95203 San Francisco, California 94111 Project Number: 160377-01.09 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 California Environmental Quality Act Process .......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Lead Responsible and Trustee Agencies .................................................................................................... 1 2 Project Description .................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Project Location and Existing Setting .......................................................................................................... 4 2.1.1 Regional Setting ................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.2 Project Setting ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Project Objectives ............................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Proposed Project Construction ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.3.1 Site Preparation .................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3.2 Site Improvements and Additions ................................................................................................ 6 2.4 Proposed Project Operations ......................................................................................................................... 8 3 Environmental Checklist ........................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ........................................................................................... 10 3.2 Determination .................................................................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ....................................................................................................... 11 3.3.1 Aesthetics ............................................................................................................................................ 12 3.3.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources ......................................................................................... 17 3.3.3 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................................ 19 3.3.4 Biological Resources ........................................................................................................................ 25 3.3.5 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................................... 30 3.3.6 Energy ................................................................................................................................................... 33 3.3.7 Geology and Soils............................................................................................................................. 36 3.3.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................................................................................................... 42 3.3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ............................................................................................. 48 3.3.10 Hydrology and Water Quality ...................................................................................................... 54 3.3.11 Land Use and Planning ................................................................................................................... 58 3.3.12 Mineral Resources ............................................................................................................................ 59 3.3.13 Noise ..................................................................................................................................................... 60 3.3.14 Population and Housing ................................................................................................................ 65 3.3.15 Public Services ................................................................................................................................... 66 3.3.16 Recreation ........................................................................................................................................... 68 3.3.17 Transportation/Traffic ..................................................................................................................... 69 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration i May 2020 3.3.18 Tribal Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................... 73 3.3.19 Utilities and Service Systems ........................................................................................................ 75 3.3.20 Wildfire ................................................................................................................................................. 79 3.3.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance .......................................................................................... 81 4 References ................................................................................................................................ 83 TABLES Table 1 Regulatory Agencies and Authority .................................................................................................... 3 Table 2 Proposed Project Throughput ............................................................................................................... 8 Table 3 San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Significance Thresholds ..................... 21 Table 4 Annual Operational Emissions in San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District – Project (Tons per Year) ....................................................................................................................... 21 Table 5 Average Daily Operational Emissions On Site – Project (Pounds per Day) .................... 22 Table 6 Maximum Day Operational Emission in San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District............................................................................................................................................................ 22 Table 7 Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons per Year) ......................................... 46 Table 8 Project Vicinity Landfills ......................................................................................................................... 76 FIGURES Figure 1 Vicinity Map ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 2 Site Plan ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 PHOTOGRAPHS Photograph 1 Aerial View of Undeveloped Proposed Project Site .................................................................. 13 Photograph 2 View from Project Site (Southwest Corner), Looking South.................................................. 14 Photograph 3 View from Project Site (Northeast Corner), Looking North ................................................... 15 APPENDICES Appendix A Special Status Species Potentially Present in the Project Area Appendix B CNPS List of Plant Species with the Potential to Occur in the Study Area Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ii May 2020 ABBREVIATIONS AB Assembly Bill BMP best management practice BPS Best Performance Standard CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards CARB California Air Resources Board CERS California Environmental Reporting System CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CFC chlorofluorocarbon CFR Code of Federal Regulations CH4 methane City City of Stockton CNEL community noise equivalent level CNPS California Native Plant Society CO carbon monoxide CO2 carbon dioxide CO2e CO2 equivalence CVAG Central Valley Ag Group dB decibel dBA A-weighted decibel Delta Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta DSP Development Standards Plan DTSC California Department of Toxic Substances Control EIR Environmental Impact Report EO Executive Order FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map FTA Federal Transit Administration GHG greenhouse gas GWP global warming potential
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Bacon Island Levee Rehabilitation Project State Clearinghouse No. 2017012062
    FINAL ◦ MAY 2017 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Bacon Island Levee Rehabilitation Project State Clearinghouse No. 2017012062 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY Reclamation District No. 2028 Stillwater Sciences (Bacon Island) 279 Cousteau Place, Suite 400 343 East Main Street, Suite 815 Davis, CA 95618 Stockton, CA 95202 Stillwater Sciences FINAL Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Bacon Island Levee Rehabilitation Project Suggested citation: Reclamation District No. 2028. 2016. Public Review Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration: Bacon Island Levee Rehabilitation Project. Prepared by Stillwater Sciences, Davis, California for Reclamation District No. 2028 (Bacon Island), Stockton, California. Cover photo: View of Bacon Island’s northwestern levee corner and surrounding interior lands. May 2017 Stillwater Sciences i FINAL Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Bacon Island Levee Rehabilitation Project PROJECT SUMMARY Project title Bacon Island Levee Rehabilitation Project Reclamation District No. 2028 CEQA lead agency name (Bacon Island) and address 343 East Main Street, Suite 815 Stockton, California 95202 Department of Water Resources (DWR) Andrea Lobato, Manager CEQA responsible agencies The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Metropolitan) Deirdre West, Environmental Planning Manager David A. Forkel Chairman, Board of Trustees Reclamation District No. 2028 343 East Main Street, Suite 815 Stockton, California 95202 Cell: (510) 693-9977 Nate Hershey, P.E. Contact person and phone District
    [Show full text]
  • From Cacti to Carnivores: Improved Phylotranscriptomic Sampling And
    Article Type: Special Issue Article RESEARCH ARTICLE INVITED SPECIAL ARTICLE For the Special Issue: Using and Navigating the Plant Tree of Life Short Title: Walker et al.—Phylotranscriptomic analysis of Caryophyllales From cacti to carnivores: Improved phylotranscriptomic sampling and hierarchical homology inference provide further insight into the evolution of Caryophyllales Joseph F. Walker1,13, Ya Yang2, Tao Feng3, Alfonso Timoneda3, Jessica Mikenas4,5, Vera Hutchison4, Caroline Edwards4, Ning Wang1, Sonia Ahluwalia1, Julia Olivieri4,6, Nathanael Walker-Hale7, Lucas C. Majure8, Raúl Puente8, Gudrun Kadereit9,10, Maximilian Lauterbach9,10, Urs Eggli11, Hilda Flores-Olvera12, Helga Ochoterena12, Samuel F. Brockington3, Michael J. Moore,4 and Stephen A. Smith1,13 Manuscript received 13 October 2017; revision accepted 4 January 2018. 1 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048 USA 2 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 1445 Gortner Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108 USA 3 Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK 4 Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Science Center K111, 119 Woodland Street, Oberlin, OH 44074-1097 USA 5 Current address: USGS Canyonlands Research Station, Southwest Biological Science Center, 2290 S West Resource Blvd, Moab, UT 84532 USA 6 Institute of Computational and Mathematical Engineering (ICME), Stanford University, 475 Author Manuscript Via Ortega, Suite B060, Stanford, CA, 94305-4042 USA This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition
    cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Technical Information
    APPENDIX D Biological Resources Technical Information Yard Piping and Road Improvements D-1 ESA / 201700483 Addendum Appendix B Plant Master Plan EIR Mitigation Measures This page intentionally left blank Yard Piping and Road Improvements D-2 ESA / 201700483 Addendum Appendix D Special-Status Species with Potential to Occur in the Project Area TABLE BIO-1 SPECIAL-STATUS PLANTS AND ANIMALS WITH POTENTIAL TO OCCUR IN THE PROJECT AREA Status Federal/ State/ Potential Occurrence in Scientific and Common Names CRPR Geographic Distribution Habitat Requirements Project Area Plants Astragalus tener var. tener --/--/1B.2 Southern Sacramento Valley, northern San Alkali playas, on adobe clay in valley and foothill Low; grasslands and seasonal wetlands Alkali milk-vetch Joaquin Valley, east San Francisco Bay Area. grassland, vernal pools on alkaline soils; below provide marginal suitable habitat. Not Considered extirpated from Santa Clara County. 60 meters above MSL. observed during rare plant survey conducted for Headworks Project in Blooms March - June 2019 (ESA 2019). Non tidal salt marsh also provides marginal suitable habitat, but no Project activities would occur in this habitat. Nearest recent occurrence (2003, occurrence #7) is 3 miles away in a constructed vernal pool. Atriplex depressa --/--/1B.2 Western and eastern Central Valley and Alkaline clay soils in chenopod scrub, playas, Low; grasslands and seasonal wetlands Brittlescale adjacent foothills on west side of Central Valley. valley and foothill grasslands, meadows and seeps provide marginal suitable habitat. Not and vernal pools on alkaline, clay soils; below observed during rare plant survey 320 meters above MSL. conducted for Headworks Project in 2019 (ESA 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Placement, Floral Anatomy, and Morphological Characterization of the North African Pastoral Halophyte Atriplex Mollis Desf
    Turkish Journal of Botany Turk J Bot (2019) 43: 475-486 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/botany/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/bot-1810-18 Phylogenetic placement, floral anatomy, and morphological characterization of the North African pastoral halophyte Atriplex mollis Desf. (Amaranthaceae) 1 1, 1 1 Abderrazak TLILI , Imed SBISSI *, Fayçal BOUGHALLEB , Hassen GOUJA , 2 3 1 Teresa GARNATJE , Joan VALLÈS , Mohamed NEFFATI 1 Arid Lands Institute, Laboratory of Pastoral Ecosystems and Valorization of Spontaneous Plants and Associated Microorganisms, University of Gabes, Medenine, Tunisia 2 Botanical Institute of Barcelona (IBB, CSIC-ICUB), Barcelona, Spain 3 Laboratory of Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Received: 05.10.2018 Accepted/Published Online: 15.02.2019 Final Version: 08.07.2019 Abstract: Atriplex mollis Desf. (Amaranthaceae), a North African endemic halophytic species, is further described in this study. Phylogenetic analysis based on a combined dataset of ITS and ETS rDNA and atpB-rbcL and trnK cpDNA showed that A. mollis is closely related to the Malta- and Gozo-endemic Cremnophyton lanfrancoi Brullo & Pavone. Given this close phylogenetic relationship, A. mollis is also considered among the oldest species of Atriplex, together with C. lanfrancoi. Molecular data also suggest that A. mollis in North Africa, C. lanfrancoi on Malta Island, and Atriplex cana Ledeb. in Eurasian semideserts constitute a separate clade within the tribe Atripliceae. As an 18-month-old shrub, A. mollis can reach a mean height of 44.06 ± 8.09 cm with a leaf area around 1.24 ± 0.15 cm2, and can produce seeds in order of 113.08 ± 28.52 g plant−1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants of the Conterminous United States
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 11-21-2019 The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants of the Conterminous United States James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants of the Conterminous United States" (2019). Botanical Studies. 99. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/99 This Flora of the United States and North America is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE FAMILIES AND GENERA OF VASCULAR PLANTS IN THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES Compiled by James P. Smith, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Name WMVC Common Name Abies Amabilis FACU Pacific
    Scientific Name WMVC Common Name Abies amabilis FACU Pacific Silver Fir Abies bifolia FACU Rocky Mountain Alpine Fir Abies grandis FACU Grand Fir Abies lasiocarpa FACU Subalpine Fir Abies procera FACU Noble Fir Abutilon theophrasti FACU Velvetleaf Acalypha rhomboidea FACU Common Three-Seed-Mercury Acer circinatum FAC Vine Maple Acer glabrum FACU Rocky Mountain Maple Acer grandidentatum FACU Canyon Maple Acer macrophyllum FACU Big-Leaf Maple Acer negundo FAC Ash-Leaf Maple Acer platanoides FACU Norway Maple Acer rubrum FAC Red Maple Acer saccharinum FAC Silver Maple Acer saccharum FACU Sugar Maple Achillea millefolium FACU Common Yarrow Achillea ptarmica FACU Pearl Yarrow Achnatherum hymenoides UPL Indian Rice Grass Achnatherum nelsonii UPL Nelson's Rice Grass Achnatherum richardsonii UPL Richardson's Rice Grass Achyrachaena mollis FAC Blow-Wives Acmispon americanus FACU American Deerweed Aconitum columbianum FACW Columbian Monkshood Aconitum infectum OBL Arizona Monkshood Aconogonon phytolaccifolium FAC Alpine Fleeceflower Acorus americanus OBL Several-Vein Sweetflag Acorus calamus OBL Single-Vein Sweetflag Actaea laciniata FACW Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • MORALES-BRIONES ET AL. 1 Library Preparation Library Preparation
    MORALES-BRIONES ET AL. 1 SUPPLEMENTARY METHODS Library preparation Library preparation was carried out using either poly-A enrichment of ribosomal RNA depletion. For Tidestromia oblongifolia, tissue collection, RNA isolation, library preparation was carried out using the KAPA Stranded mRNA-Seq Kits (KAPA Biosystems, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA). The library was multiplexed with 10 other samples from a different project on an Illumina HiSeq2500 platform with V4 chemistry at the University of Michigan Sequencing Core. For the remaining 16 samples total RNA was isolated from c. 70-125 mg leaf tissue collected in liquid nitrogen using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s protocol (June 2012). A DNase digestion step was included with the RNase-Free DNase Set (Qiagen). Quality and quantity of RNA were checked using the 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). Library preparation was carried out using the TruSeq® Stranded Total RNA Library Prep Plant with RiboZero probes (96 Samples. Illumina, #20020611; Schuierer et al. 2017). Indexed libraries were normalized, pooled and size selected to 320bp +/- 5% using the Pippin Prep HT instrument to generate libraries with mean inserts of 200 bp, and sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq2500 platform with V4 chemistry at the University of Minnesota Genomics Center. Reads from all 17 libraries were paired-end 125 bp. MORALES-BRIONES ET AL. 2 Transcriptome data processing and assembly Scripts and instructions for read processing, assembly, translation, and homology and orthology search can be found at https://bitbucket.org/yanglab/phylogenomic_dataset_construction/ as part of an updated ‘phylogenomic dataset construction’ pipeline (Yang and Smith 2014). We processed raw reads for all 88 transcriptome datasets (except Bienertia sinuspersici) used in this study (Table S1).
    [Show full text]
  • Seabird Habitat Restoration Onsanta Barbara Island, California: 2007-2014 Data Report
    Seabird Habitat Restoration onSanta Barbara Island, California: 2007-2014 Data Report Marie-Eve Jacques1, Andrew A. Yamagiwa1, David M. Mazurkiewicz2, A. Laurie Harvey3, and Annie Little4 1California Institute of Environmental Studies 1901 Spinnaker Drive Ventura, CA 93001 [email protected] 2Channel Islands National Park 1901 Spinnaker Drive Ventura, CA 93001 3Sutil Conservation Ecology 30 Buena Vista Ave Fairfax, CA 94930 4U.S. Fish and Widlife Service 1901 Spinnaker Drive Ventura, CA 93001 14 December 2015 Suggested Citation: Jacques, M.E., A.A. Yamagiwa, D.M. Mazurkiewicz, A.L. Harvey, and A. Little. 2015. Seabird habitat restoration on Santa Barbara Island, California: 2007-2014 data report. Unpublished report, California Institute of Environmental Studies. 242 pages. Page 1 of 242 ACRONYMS ACMI: Common Yarrow (Achillea millefolium) ARXX: Coastal Sagebrush (Artemisia californica) and Island Sagebrush (Artemisia nesiotica) ATCA: California Saltbush (Extriplex californica; formerly Atriplex californica) BAPI: Coyote Brush (Baccharis pilularis) BHP: Beacon Hill Restoration Plot CAAU: Cassin’s Auklet (Ptychoramphus aleuticus) CAMA: Island Morning-Glory (Calystegia macrostegia s. amplissima) CHCA: California Goosefoot (Chenopodium californicum) CIES: California Institute of Environmental Studies CINP: Channel Islands National Park COGI: Giant Tickseed (Leptosyne gigantea; formerly Coreopsis gigantea) CONE: Nevin's Woolly Sunflower (Constancea nevinii; formerly Eriophyllum nevinii) DECL: Island Tarplant (Deinandra clementina; formerly
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Supporting Documentation
    APPENDIX C: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION TABLE C-1 USDA APHIS-WS AGENCY CONSULTATION RESULTS FOR THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES USDA APHIS- WS Agency Federal Consultation Common Name Scientific Name State Listing Listing Results Mammals Giant kangaroo rat Dipodomys ingens FE No Effect/3 San Joaquin kit fox Vulpes macrotis mutica ST FE No Effect/4,5,7,8 Southern sea otter Enhydra lutris nereis FT (a)(b) Birds Delisted Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus SE* FT NLAA/4,7 FE (rev) FE Bank swallow Riparia riparia ST No Effect/4,7 Belding’s savannah sparrow Passerculus sandwichensis beldingi SE No Effect/4,7 California black rail Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus ST* No Effect/4,7 California clapper rail Rallus longirostris obsoletus SE* FE No Effect/4,7,8 California condor Gymnogyps californianus SE* FE NLAA/1,4,5,7 California least tern Sternula antillarum browni SE* FE No Effect/4,7,8 No Effect/4,5,7 Least Bell’s vireo Vireo bellii pusillus SE FE NLAA/5 Marbled murrelet Brachyramphus marmoratus SE FT No Effect/4,5,7 Scripps’s murrelet Synthliboramphus scrippsi ST No Effect/5,7 Short-tailed albatross Phoebastria albatrus FE NLAA/3 Southwestern willow NLAA 4,5;7 Empidonax traillii extimus SE FE flycatcher No Effect/5 Swainson’s hawk Buteo swainsoni ST No Effect/4,7 Western snowy plover Charadrius nivosus nivosus FT NLAA /5 Amphibians and Reptiles Arroyo toad Anaxyrus californicus FE No Effect/3 Blunt-nose leopard lizard Gambella silus SE* FE No Effect/3,(b) California red-legged frog Rana draytonii FT No Effect/3 (FE)
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition by Jon P
    i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson © 2001 by Michael G. Simpson and Jon P. Rebman © 1996 by Michael G. Simpson, Scott C. McMillan, Brenda L. McMillan, Judy Gibson, and Jon P. Rebman. © 1995 by Michael G. Simpson, Scott C. McMillan, and Brenda L. Stone This material may not be reproduced or resold. for correspondence, write to: Dr. Jon P. Rebman, San Diego Natural History Museum, P.O. Box 121390, San Diego, CA 92112-1390 Email: [email protected] or to: Dr. Michael G. Simpson, Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-4614 Email: [email protected] Cover photographs are plants endemic to San Diego County, California, all taken by the authors. iii table of contents preface v alphabetical listing of families xxi san Diego county vascular plant checklist: Documented with herbarium vouchers lycophytes 1 equisetophytes 1 ophioglossoid ferns 1 leptosporangiate ferns 1 seed plants 3 conifers 3 gnetales 4 angiosperms (flowering plants) 4 Magnoliids: laurales (calycanthaceae & lauraceae) 4 Magnoliids: piperales (saururaceae) 4 ceratophyllales (ceratophyllaceae) 4 eudicots 4 Monocots 81 appendix 1: taxa reported for san Diego county but excluded 97 appendix
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Ancient Hybridizations in Amaranthaceae Sl
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/794370; this version posted July 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 1 Disentangling Sources of Gene Tree Discordance in Phylogenomic Datasets: Testing 2 Ancient Hybridizations in Amaranthaceae s.l. 3 4 Diego F. Morales-Briones1*, Gudrun Kadereit2, Delphine T. Tefarikis2, Michael J. Moore3, 5 Stephen A. Smith4, Samuel F. Brockington5, Alfonso Timoneda5, Won C. Yim6, John C. 6 Cushman6, Ya Yang1* 7 8 1 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 1445 9 Gortner Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA 10 2 Institut für Molekulare Physiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, D-55099, Mainz, 11 Germany 12 3 Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Science Center K111, 119 Woodland Street, Oberlin, 13 OH 44074-1097, USA 14 4 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 North University 15 Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048, USA 16 5 Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 17 3EA, United Kingdom 18 6 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 89577, 19 USA 20 21 * Correspondence to be sent to: Diego F. Morales-Briones and Ya Yang. Department of Plant and 22 Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, 1445 Gortner Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA, 23 Telephone: +1 612-625-6292 (YY) Email: [email protected]; [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/794370; this version posted July 14, 2020.
    [Show full text]