DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Resources Technical Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological Resources Technical Information APPENDIX D Biological Resources Technical Information Yard Piping and Road Improvements D-1 ESA / 201700483 Addendum Appendix B Plant Master Plan EIR Mitigation Measures This page intentionally left blank Yard Piping and Road Improvements D-2 ESA / 201700483 Addendum Appendix D Special-Status Species with Potential to Occur in the Project Area TABLE BIO-1 SPECIAL-STATUS PLANTS AND ANIMALS WITH POTENTIAL TO OCCUR IN THE PROJECT AREA Status Federal/ State/ Potential Occurrence in Scientific and Common Names CRPR Geographic Distribution Habitat Requirements Project Area Plants Astragalus tener var. tener --/--/1B.2 Southern Sacramento Valley, northern San Alkali playas, on adobe clay in valley and foothill Low; grasslands and seasonal wetlands Alkali milk-vetch Joaquin Valley, east San Francisco Bay Area. grassland, vernal pools on alkaline soils; below provide marginal suitable habitat. Not Considered extirpated from Santa Clara County. 60 meters above MSL. observed during rare plant survey conducted for Headworks Project in Blooms March - June 2019 (ESA 2019). Non tidal salt marsh also provides marginal suitable habitat, but no Project activities would occur in this habitat. Nearest recent occurrence (2003, occurrence #7) is 3 miles away in a constructed vernal pool. Atriplex depressa --/--/1B.2 Western and eastern Central Valley and Alkaline clay soils in chenopod scrub, playas, Low; grasslands and seasonal wetlands Brittlescale adjacent foothills on west side of Central Valley. valley and foothill grasslands, meadows and seeps provide marginal suitable habitat. Not and vernal pools on alkaline, clay soils; below observed during rare plant survey 320 meters above MSL. conducted for Headworks Project in 2019 (ESA 2019). Non tidal salt marsh Blooms April - October also provides marginal suitable habitat, but no Project activities would occur in this habitat. Nearest recent occurrence from 2003 (occurrence #67) 3 miles away was determined to be Atriplex minuscula in 2010. Atriplex joaquiniana --/--/1B.2 West edge of Central Valley from Glenn County Alkaline soils in chenopod scrub, meadows and Low; grasslands and seasonal wetlands San Joaquin spearscale to Tulare County. Also reported from Monterey seeps, playas, valley and foothill grassland; below provide marginal suitable habitat. Not and San Luis Obispo Counties. 835 meters above MSL. observed during rare plant survey Blooms April - September conducted for Headworks Project in 2019 (ESA 2019). Non tidal salt marsh also provides marginal suitable habitat, but no Project activities would occur in this habitat. Atriplex minuscula --/--/1B.1 Sacramento and San Joaquin Valley, Butte Sandy alkaline soils in chenopod scrub, playas, Low; grasslands and seasonal wetlands Lesser saltscale County and from Merced County to Kern valley and foothill grassland; 15-200 meters above provide marginal suitable habitat. Not County. Also recorded from Don Edwards NWR MSL. observed during rare plant survey in Alameda County. Blooms May - October conducted for Headworks Project in 2019 (ESA 2019). Non tidal salt marsh also provides marginal suitable habitat, but no Project activities would occur in this habitat. Yard Piping and Road Improvements D-3 ESA / 201700483 Addendum October 2020 Appendix D Special-Status Species with Potential to Occur in the Study Area TABLE D-1 (Continued) SPECIAL-STATUS PLANTS AND ANIMALS WITH POTENTIAL TO OCCUR IN THE STUDY AREA Status Federal/ State/ Potential Occurrence in Scientific and Common Names CRPR Geographic Distribution Habitat Requirements Project Area Plants (cont.) Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii --/--/1B.1 East San Francisco Bay Area, Salinas Valley, Alkaline soils in annual grassland, on lower slopes, Moderate; the species is documented in Congdon’s tarplant Los Osos Valley. flats, and swales, sometimes on saline soils; below alkali grassland west of the Project area. 230 meters above MSL. Reconnaissance surveys for this species Blooms May - October conducted during the blooming period for the Iron Salts project and Headworks project, were negative. Since then, that area has been exposed to routine disturbance by Facility operations. ESA’s Alternatives Constraints Analysis reconnaissance surveys for the Project for Congdon’s tarplant in August 2016 and the Project’s wetland delineation in August 2017 confirmed absence of the species. Chorizanthe robusta var. robusta E/--/1B.1 Coastal central California, from San Mateo to Coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes openings in Absent; there is no suitable habitat within Robust spineflower Monterey County. cismontane woodland, on sandy soil. the Project area. Blooms April - September Chloropyron maritimum ssp. palustre --/--/1B.2 Coastal northern California, from Humboldt to Coastal salt marsh, tidal salt marsh; below Absent; Non tidal salt marsh provides Point Reyes bird’s-beak Santa Clara County, though presumed 10 meters above MSL. marginal suitable habitat, but no Project extirpated from Santa Clara County. Blooms June - October activities would occur in this habitat. Eryngium aristulatum var. hooveri --/--/1B.1 South San Francisco Bay area, South Coast Vernal pools; 3-45 meters above MSL. Low; seasonal wetlands provide Hoover’s button-celery Ranges in Alameda, San Benito, Santa Clara, Blooms June - August marginal suitable habitat. Not observed and San Luis Obispo Counties, though during rare plant survey conducted for presumed extirpated from Santa Clara County. Headworks Project in 2019 (ESA 2019). Lasthenia conjugens E/--/1B.1 Scattered occurrences in Coast Range valleys Wet areas in cismontane woodland, valley and Low; there is no suitable habitat within Contra Costa goldfields and southwest edge of Sacramento Valley, foothill grassland, vernal pools, alkaline playas or the Project area. Alameda, Contra Costa, Monterey, Marin, Napa, saline vernal pools and swales; seasonal wetlands Solano and Sonoma Counties. Presumed below 470 meters above MSL. extirpated in Mendocino, Santa Barbara and Blooms March - June Santa Clara Counties. Malacothamnus arcuatus –/–/1B.2 Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, and San Mateo Chaparral, between 15-355 meters above MSL. Absent; there is no suitable habitat within arcuate bush-mallow Counties. Blooms April - September the Project area. Yard Piping and Road Improvements D-4 ESA / 201700483 Addendum October 2020 Appendix D Special-Status Species with Potential to Occur in the Study Area TABLE D-1 (Continued) SPECIAL-STATUS PLANTS AND ANIMALS WITH POTENTIAL TO OCCUR IN THE STUDY AREA Status Federal/ State/ Potential Occurrence in Scientific and Common Names CRPR Geographic Distribution Habitat Requirements Project Area Plants (cont.) Navarretia prostrata --/--/1B.1 Western San Joaquin Valley, interior South Vernal pools and mesic areas in coastal scrub and Low; seasonal wetlands provide Prostrate vernal pool navarretia Coast Ranges, central South Coast, Peninsular alkali grasslands, seasonal wetlands in alkaline marginal suitable habitat. Not observed Ranges: Alameda, Los Angeles, Merced, soils; between 15-700 meters above MSL. during rare plant survey conducted for Monterey, Orange, Riverside, San Diego, and Blooms April - July Headworks Project in 2019 (ESA 2019). San Luis Obispo Counties. Suaeda californica E/--/1B.1 Morro Bay, San Luis Obispo County, and San Margins of tidal salt marsh; below 15 meters above Absent; there is no suitable habitat within California seablite Francisco and Contra Costa Counties; MSL. the Project area. historically found in the south San Francisco Blooms June - October Bay. Trifolium hydrophilum --/--/1B.2 Sacramento Valley, central western California. Salt marsh, mesic alkaline areas in Valley and Low; Non tidal salt marsh provides (T. depauperatum var. hydrophilum) foothill grasslands, vernal pools, marshes and marginal suitable habitat, but no Project Saline clover swamps; below 300 meters above MSL. activities would occur in this habitat. Blooms April - June Nearest documented occurrence is in Alviso, ~ 1-mile away. Invertebrates Euphydryas editha bayensis Bay T/-- Disjunct occurrences in San Mateo and Santa Associated with specific host plants that typically Absent; there is no suitable habitat for checkerspot butterfly Clara Counties. grow on serpentine soils. this species, as there are no serpentine soils in the Project area. Lepidurus packardi E/-- Shasta County south to Merced County. Vernal pools and ephemeral stock ponds. Absent; there is no suitable habitat in the Vernal pool tadpole shrimp Project area. Amphibians Ambystoma californiense T/T Central Valley, including Sierra Nevada foothills, Small ponds, lakes, or vernal pools in grasslands Low; suitable breeding habitat and California tiger salamander up to approximately 1,000 feet, and coastal and oak woodlands for larvae; rodent burrows, upland habitat are not known or region from Sonoma County south to Santa rock crevices, or fallen logs for cover for adults and described from the Project area; the Barbara County. for summer dormancy. nearest documented occurrence of this species is 4.5 miles away from the Project area near Albrae. Rana draytonii T/SSC Found along the coast and coastal mountain Permanent and semipermanent aquatic habitats, Low; there is no known breeding habitat California red-legged frog ranges of California from Mendocino County to such as creeks and cold-water ponds, with in the Project area; with the nearest red- San Diego County and in the Sierra Nevada emergent and submergent vegetation; may legged frog populations located east of from Butte County to Stanislaus
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 186/Friday, September
    Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 186 / Friday, September 25, 1998 / Proposed Rules 51329 relation to relevant statutory and advising any small governments that additional populations and on new regulatory requirements. may be significantly or uniquely information concerning the species' impacted by the rule. habitat requirements and apparent IV. Administrative Requirements EPA has determined that the approval tolerance to habitat impacts. A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13045 action proposed does not include a ADDRESSES: The complete file for this Federal mandate that may result in The Office of Management and Budget notice is available for public inspection, estimated costs of $100 million or more (OMB) has exempted this regulatory by appointment, during normal business to either State, local, or tribal action from E.O. 12866 review. hours at the Service's New Mexico governments in the aggregate, or to the The proposed rule is not subject to Ecological Services Field Office, 2105 private sector. This Federal action E.O. 13045, entitled ``Protection of Osuna Road, NE., Albuquerque, New approves pre-existing requirements Children from Environmental Health Mexico 87113. under State or local law, and imposes Risks and Safety Risks,'' because it is FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: no new Federal requirements. not an ``economically significant'' action Charlie McDonald at the above address, Accordingly, no additional costs to under E.O. 12866. or telephone 505/346±2525. State, local, or tribal governments, or to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: B. Regulatory Flexibility Act the private sector, result from this Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, action. Background 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA must prepare List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Parish's alkali grass was first collected a regulatory flexibility analysis Environmental protection, Air by Samuel Bonsal Parish at Rabbit assessing the impact of any proposed or pollution control, Hydrocarbons, Springs in the Mojave Desert of final rule on small entities.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Species Accounts Appendix D Species Accounts
    Appendix D Species Accounts Appendix D Species Accounts Table of Contents San Joaquin Spearscale (Atriplex joaquiniana) ...................................................... 1 Recurved Larkspur (Delphinium recurvatum) ........................................................ 4 Big Tarplant (Blepharizonia plumosa) .................................................................... 6 Congdon’s Tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii) ..................................... 8 Palmate-bracted bird’s-beak (Cordylanthus palmatus) ....................................... 10 Livermore tarplant (Deinandra bacigalupii) ........................................................ 11 Longhorn Fairy Shrimp ......................................................................................... 12 Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp ..................................................................................... 15 Callippe Silverspot Butterfly ................................................................................ 18 California Tiger Salamander ................................................................................. 21 California Red-Legged Frog .................................................................................. 25 Foothill yellow-legged frog .................................................................................. 28 Alameda Whipsnake ............................................................................................ 31 Central California Coast Steelhead .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae)
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 392 Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae) CATARINA EKENÄS ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 UPPSALA ISBN 978-91-554-7092-0 2008 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva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ist of Papers This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals: I Ekenäs, C., B. G. Baldwin, and K. Andreasen. 2007. A molecular phylogenetic
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Bacon Island Levee Rehabilitation Project State Clearinghouse No. 2017012062
    FINAL ◦ MAY 2017 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Bacon Island Levee Rehabilitation Project State Clearinghouse No. 2017012062 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY Reclamation District No. 2028 Stillwater Sciences (Bacon Island) 279 Cousteau Place, Suite 400 343 East Main Street, Suite 815 Davis, CA 95618 Stockton, CA 95202 Stillwater Sciences FINAL Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Bacon Island Levee Rehabilitation Project Suggested citation: Reclamation District No. 2028. 2016. Public Review Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration: Bacon Island Levee Rehabilitation Project. Prepared by Stillwater Sciences, Davis, California for Reclamation District No. 2028 (Bacon Island), Stockton, California. Cover photo: View of Bacon Island’s northwestern levee corner and surrounding interior lands. May 2017 Stillwater Sciences i FINAL Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Bacon Island Levee Rehabilitation Project PROJECT SUMMARY Project title Bacon Island Levee Rehabilitation Project Reclamation District No. 2028 CEQA lead agency name (Bacon Island) and address 343 East Main Street, Suite 815 Stockton, California 95202 Department of Water Resources (DWR) Andrea Lobato, Manager CEQA responsible agencies The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Metropolitan) Deirdre West, Environmental Planning Manager David A. Forkel Chairman, Board of Trustees Reclamation District No. 2028 343 East Main Street, Suite 815 Stockton, California 95202 Cell: (510) 693-9977 Nate Hershey, P.E. Contact person and phone District
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of Santa Cruz County, California
    ANNOTATED CHECKLIST of the VASCULAR PLANTS of SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SECOND EDITION Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland & Maps by Ben Pease CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CHAPTER Copyright © 2013 by Dylan Neubauer All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the author. Design & Production by Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland Maps by Ben Pease, Pease Press Cartography (peasepress.com) Cover photos (Eschscholzia californica & Big Willow Gulch, Swanton) by Dylan Neubauer California Native Plant Society Santa Cruz County Chapter P.O. Box 1622 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 To order, please go to www.cruzcps.org For other correspondence, write to Dylan Neubauer [email protected] ISBN: 978-0-615-85493-9 Printed on recycled paper by Community Printers, Santa Cruz, CA For Tim Forsell, who appreciates the tiny ones ... Nobody sees a flower, really— it is so small— we haven’t time, and to see takes time, like to have a friend takes time. —GEORGIA O’KEEFFE CONTENTS ~ u Acknowledgments / 1 u Santa Cruz County Map / 2–3 u Introduction / 4 u Checklist Conventions / 8 u Floristic Regions Map / 12 u Checklist Format, Checklist Symbols, & Region Codes / 13 u Checklist Lycophytes / 14 Ferns / 14 Gymnosperms / 15 Nymphaeales / 16 Magnoliids / 16 Ceratophyllales / 16 Eudicots / 16 Monocots / 61 u Appendices 1. Listed Taxa / 76 2. Endemic Taxa / 78 3. Taxa Extirpated in County / 79 4. Taxa Not Currently Recognized / 80 5. Undescribed Taxa / 82 6. Most Invasive Non-native Taxa / 83 7. Rejected Taxa / 84 8. Notes / 86 u References / 152 u Index to Families & Genera / 154 u Floristic Regions Map with USGS Quad Overlay / 166 “True science teaches, above all, to doubt and be ignorant.” —MIGUEL DE UNAMUNO 1 ~ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ~ ANY THANKS TO THE GENEROUS DONORS without whom this publication would not M have been possible—and to the numerous individuals, organizations, insti- tutions, and agencies that so willingly gave of their time and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Glenn Lukos Associates
    TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM GLENN LUKOS ASSOCIATES Regulatory Services PROJECT NUMBER: 03650025CLAY TO: Hardy Strozier, The Planning Associates FROM: Jason Fitzgibbon, Biologist DATE: May 25, 2014 SUBJECT: Update to Biological Constraints Analysis for the 1,400-Acre Alberhill Villages Specific Plan Site Located in Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California. On March 24, and May 12, 2014, updated focused plant surveys and general biological surveys were conducted at the approximately 1,420-acre Alberhill Villages Specific Plan (site), in the City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California. Firstly, the purpose of this update was to verify existing biological resources on-site as identified during surveys conducted by Glenn Lukos Associates (GLA) biologists in 2008. Secondly, updated focused plant surveys, general biological surveys, and habitat assessments for sensitive species were conducted to identify and address the potential for the project to impact any sensitive species that may not have been addressed in the 2008 GLA Biological Constraints report. SUMMARY In general, relatively few changes were noted at the approximately 1,420-acre site. The majority of the site is still being actively mined and as a result is primarily comprised of ruderal, non- native vegetation, or recently disturbed ground. Significant changes in vegetation/land cover types at the site included the recent removal of a large area of non-native eucalyptus (Eucalyptus sp.) woodland along the northern margin of the site adjacent to Temescal Creek Road, the establishment of a few isolated patches of Riversidean sage scrub within the active mine footprint, and the growth of willow riparian forest along the perimeter of multiple water quality basins.
    [Show full text]
  • From Cacti to Carnivores: Improved Phylotranscriptomic Sampling And
    Article Type: Special Issue Article RESEARCH ARTICLE INVITED SPECIAL ARTICLE For the Special Issue: Using and Navigating the Plant Tree of Life Short Title: Walker et al.—Phylotranscriptomic analysis of Caryophyllales From cacti to carnivores: Improved phylotranscriptomic sampling and hierarchical homology inference provide further insight into the evolution of Caryophyllales Joseph F. Walker1,13, Ya Yang2, Tao Feng3, Alfonso Timoneda3, Jessica Mikenas4,5, Vera Hutchison4, Caroline Edwards4, Ning Wang1, Sonia Ahluwalia1, Julia Olivieri4,6, Nathanael Walker-Hale7, Lucas C. Majure8, Raúl Puente8, Gudrun Kadereit9,10, Maximilian Lauterbach9,10, Urs Eggli11, Hilda Flores-Olvera12, Helga Ochoterena12, Samuel F. Brockington3, Michael J. Moore,4 and Stephen A. Smith1,13 Manuscript received 13 October 2017; revision accepted 4 January 2018. 1 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048 USA 2 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 1445 Gortner Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108 USA 3 Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK 4 Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Science Center K111, 119 Woodland Street, Oberlin, OH 44074-1097 USA 5 Current address: USGS Canyonlands Research Station, Southwest Biological Science Center, 2290 S West Resource Blvd, Moab, UT 84532 USA 6 Institute of Computational and Mathematical Engineering (ICME), Stanford University, 475 Author Manuscript Via Ortega, Suite B060, Stanford, CA, 94305-4042 USA This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition
    cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P.
    [Show full text]
  • Delta Products Property
    BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS REPORT FOR THE DELTA PRODUCTS PROPERTY FREMONT, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: CITY OF FREMONT PLANNING DIVISION 39550 Liberty Street Fremont, California 94538 Prepared by: OLBERDING ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Wetland Regulatory Consultants 3170 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 260 San Ramon, California 94583 Phone: (925) 866-2111 ~ FAX (925) 866-2126 Contact: Jeff Olberding MAY 2012 Revised JULY 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 3 2.0 LOCATION .......................................................................................................................... 3 3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 3 4.0 REGULATORY SETTING ................................................................................................. 4 4.1 Federal Regulatory Setting ........................................................................................ 4 4.1.1 Plants and Wildlife ...................................................................................... 4 4.1.2 Wetlands/Waters ......................................................................................... 4 4.1.3 Migratory Bird Treaty Act .......................................................................... 6 4.1.4 The
    [Show full text]
  • Fine-Scale to Flora-Wide Phylogenetic Perspectives on Californian Plant Diversity, Endemism, and Conservation
    Fine-scale to flora-wide phylogenetic perspectives on Californian plant diversity, endemism, and conservation Bruce G. Baldwin1,2 1 I thank Peter H. Raven, Patricia J. D. Raven, and Peter C. Hoch for being such gracious hosts at the 65th Annual Symposium of the Missouri Botanical Garden on the “Biota of North America: What we know, what we don’t know and what we’re losing.” I also am grateful to Brent D. Mishler, David D. Ackerly, Matthew M. Kling, Andrew H. Thornhill, and other members of the California Plant Phylodiversity Project (CPPP) for their spatial phylogenetic and conservation prioritization efforts and collaboration, to Matthew M. Kling for providing Fig. 1G and 1H, to Toni Corelli, Neal Kramer, Michael Park, and Chris Winchell for permission to reproduce photographs in Fig. 1, to Susan Fawcett for assistance with Fig. 1, and to her and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on the manuscript. Research summarized here was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (DEB-1354552, to Brent D. Mishler, David D. Ackerly, and BGB; DEB-1601504, to Adam C. Schneider and BGB; and DEB-0324733 and DEB-9458237, to BGB), the Lawrence R. Heckard Endowment Fund of the Jepson Herbarium, and the late Roderic B. Park and other Friends of the Jepson Herbarium. 2 Jepson Herbarium and Department of Integrative Biology, 1001 Valley Life Sciences Building #2465, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-2465, U.S.A. [email protected] Key words: biodiversity hotspots, California Floristic Province, cryptic diversity, deserts, extinction, floristics, Mediterranean climate, neo-endemism, paleo-endemism, phylodiversity, phyloendemism, spatial phylogenetics.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices I Through VIII
    APPENDIX I: Standards for Ecological Classification A given terrestrial ecological system is defined as a group of plant community types that tend to co-occur within landscapes with similar ecological processes, substrates, and/or environmental gradients. A given terrestrial ecological system will typically manifest itself in a landscape at intermediate geographic scales of 10s to 1,000s of hectares and persist for 50 or more years. Ecological processes include natural disturbances such as fire and flooding. Substrates may include a variety of soil surface and bedrock features, such as shallow soils, alkaline parent materials, sandy/gravelling soils, or peatlands. Finally, environmental gradients include hydrologically defined patterns in coastal zones, arid grassland or desert areas, or montane, alpine or subalpine zones defined by climate. By plant community type, we mean a vegetation classification unit at the association or alliance level of the US National Vegetation Classification (US-NVC) (Grossman et al. 1998, Jennings et al. 2003, NatureServe 2004), or, if these are not available, other comparable vegetation units. US-NVC associations are used wherever possible to describe the component biotic communities of each terrestrial system. Ecological systems are defined using both spatial and temporal criteria that influence the grouping of associations. Associations that consistently co-occur on the landscape therefore define biotic components of each ecological system type. Our approach to ecological systems definition using US-NVC associations is similar to the biotope or habitat approach used, for example, by the EUNIS habitat classification, which explicitly links meso-scale habitat units to European Vegetation Survey alliance units (Rodwell et al. 2002).
    [Show full text]