Toxicologic Pathology, 38: 5S-81S, 2010 Copyright # 2010 by The Author(s) ISSN: 0192-6233 print / 1533-1601 online DOI: 10.1177/0192623310386499
Proliferative and Nonproliferative Lesions of the Rat and Mouse Hepatobiliary System
1 2* 3 4 5 6 BOB THOOLEN ,ROBERT R. MARONPOT ,TAKANORI HARADA ,ABRAHAM NYSKA ,COLIN ROUSSEAUX ,THOMAS NOLTE , 7 8 9 10 11 12 DAVID E. MALARKEY ,WOLFGANG KAUFMANN ,KARIN KU¨ TTLER ,ULRICH DESCHL ,DAI NAKAE ,RICHARD GREGSON , 13 14 15 16 17 MICHAEL P. VINLOVE ,AMY E. BRIX ,BHANU SINGH ,FIORELLA BELPOGGI , AND JERROLD M. WARD 1Global Pathology Support, The Hague, The Netherlands 2Maronpot Consulting LLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA 3The Institute of Environmental Toxicology, Joso-shi, Ibaraki, Japan 4Haharuv 18, Timrat, Israel 5Wakefield QC, Canada 6Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., Biberach an der Riss, Germany 7National Toxicology Program, Cellular and Molecular Pathology Branch, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA 8Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany 9BASF Aktiengesellschaft, Ludwigshafen, Germany 10Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach/Riss, Germany 11Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan 12Charles River Laboratories, Pathology Department, Senneville, QC, Canada 13Pathology Associates, Charles River, Frederick, Maryland, USA 14Experimental Pathology Laboratories Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA 15DuPont Haskell Global Centers for Health and Environmental Science, Newark, Delaware, USA 16Ramazzini Institute, Bentivoglio (BO), Italy 17Global VetPathology, Montgomery Village, Maryland, USA *Chairman of the Liver INHAND Committee
ABSTRACT
The INHAND Project (International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria for Lesions in Rats and Mice) is a joint initiative of the Societies of Toxicologic Pathology from Europe (ESTP), Great Britain (BSTP), Japan (JSTP) and North America (STP) to develop an interna- tionally-accepted nomenclature for proliferative and non-proliferative lesions in laboratory animals. The purpose of this publication is to provide a standardized nomenclature and differential diagnosis for classifying microscopic lesions observed in the hepatobiliary system of laboratory rats and mice, with color microphotographs illustrating examples of some lesions. The standardized nomenclature presented in this document is also available for society members electronically on the internet (http://goreni.org). Sources of material included histopathology databases from government, academia, and industrial laboratories throughout the world. Content includes spontaneous and aging lesions as well as lesions induced by exposure to test materials. A widely accepted and utilized international harmonization of nomenclature for lesions of the hepatobiliary system in laboratory animals will decrease confusion among regulatory and scientific research organizations in different countries and provide a common language to increase and enrich international exchanges of information among toxicologists and pathologists.
Keywords: diagnostic pathology; hepatobiliary system; histopathology; liver; nomenclature; rodent pathology.
Address correspondence to: Bob Thoolen, Global Pathology Support, Benoordenhoutseweg 23, The Hague 2596 BA, Netherlands; e-mail: bob.thoolen@ gpstoxpath.com. Financial Disclosure: No money was paid for the preparation of this manuscript. During the construction of this manuscript salaries of contributors were paid by their respective companies. None of the content of the manuscript contains any information that could be patentable or claimed as intellectual property of the contributors or their respective companies. Abbreviations: AE1/AE3, Two clones of anti-cytokeratin monoclonal antibodies; a.k.a., Also known as; AS, Anterior Segment; a-SMA, a-smooth muscle actin; Bcl-2, B-cel lymphoma 2 - apoptosis regulator protein; BSTP, British Society of Toxicological Pathologists; CD (31, 34, 68), Cluster differentiation (31, 34, 68); CEA, Carcinoembryonic antigen; CK, Cytokeratin; ED1, Rat homologue of human CD68; EM, Electron microscopy; ESTP, European Society of Toxicologic Pathology; Factor VIII, Blood clotting factor/anti-hemophilic factor; F4/80, Rat anti-mouse macrophage monoclonal antibody; H&E, Hematoxylin and Eosin; IHC, Immunohistochemistry; JSTP, The Japanese Society of Toxicologic Pathology; Ki-67, Nuclear protein associated with proliferation; LAMP, Lysosome- associated protein; LLL, Lef lateral lobe; LML, Left medial lobe; MIB-1, Monoclonal antibody that detects K-67 antigen on formalin fixed paraffin embedded sections; MS, Middle Segment; NTP, National Toxicology Program; NLDC-145, Rat anti-mouse dendritic cell monoclonal antibody; NOS, Not otherwise specified; OX-6, MHC Class II Ia antibody; PAS, Periodic acid-Schiff; PC, Caudate Process; PCNA, Proliferator Cell Nuclear Antigen; PCR, Polymerase Chain Reaction; PP, Papillary Process; PPA, Processus papillaris anterior; PPAR, Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor; PS, Posterior Segment; RER, Rough Endoplasmic Reticulum; RLL, Right lateral lobe; RML, Right medial lobe; SRA-E5, Mouse monoclonal anti-macrophage antibody for Scavenger Receptor A; SOPs, Standard Operating Procedures; STP, Society of Toxicologic Pathology.
5S
Downloaded from tpx.sagepub.com at Society of Toxicologic Pathology on May 21, 2015 6S THOOLEN ET AL. TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
TABLE 1.—Species differences in liver lobes.
Human (4 / 8)a Monkey (4 / 8) Dog (6 / 7) Rat (4 / 7) Mouse (4 / 7) Cat (6 / 7) Left liver Left Lobe (2 segments) Left (lateral) Lobe Left Lobe Left Lobe Left Lobe Left Lobe LLL AS þ PS LLL þ LML LLL þ LML LLL þ LML (largest) þ LML Right liver Right Lobe (2 segments) Right (lateral) Lobe Right Lobe RLL Right Lobe Right Lobe Right Lobe AS þ MS þ PS (impression) þ RML RLL þ RML RLL þ RML RLL þ RML Intermediate liver Quadrate Lobe Median Lobe (largest) Quadrate Lobe Quadrate Lobe Quadrate Lobe (small) Caudate lobe Caudate Lobe Caudate Lobe Caudate Lobe Caudate Lobe Caudate Lobe Caudate Lobe PC þ PP PP þ PC PP þ PPA þ PC PP þ PC PP þ PC
LLL ¼ Left lateral lobe; RLL ¼ Right lateral lobe; PC ¼ Caudate Process; LML ¼ Left medial lobe; RML ¼ Right medial lobe; PP ¼ Papillary Process; PPA ¼ Processus papillaris anterior; AS ¼ Anterior Segment; MS ¼ Middle Segment; PS ¼ Posterior Segment. Gray, Williams, and Bannister (1995); Browning, Schroeder, and Berringer (1974); Ko¨nig, Sautet, and Liebich (2004); Rajtova´, Hora´k, and Popesko (2002); Vons et al., 2009. a (Number of lobes / Number of lobes including segments).
I. GENERAL INTRODUCTION frequently observed in pathological evaluation of toxicity studies. The liver is a major target organ in safety assessment of preclinical toxicity and oncogenicity studies with rodents; hence, hepatic pathology is central to many toxicological II. ANATOMY pathology studies. As toxicologic pathologists sometimes The liver occupies the cranial third of the abdominal experience difficulties in distinguishing the wide variety of cavity and is comprised of multiple lobes; however, the liver lesions in the rodents for safety evaluation purposes, this nomenclature for the liver lobes varies among authors. There document is a consensus of senior toxicologic pathologists are basically left, middle, right,andcaudate lobes (Harada regarding suggested nomenclature that should be used for et al. 1999; Eustis et al. 1990). A thin connective tissue cap- specific lesions. sule that is externally lined by peritoneal mesothelial cells Standardized diagnostic criteria and nomenclature are covers the parietal and visceral surfaces of the liver. The essential to harmonize the classification and reporting of hepa- middle lobe has an incomplete fissure where the falciform tic nonproliferative as well as proliferative lesions. This ligament attaches. In mice the gallbladder is located in the INHAND document serves as a framework that can be used for middle lobe fissure, whereas the rat does not have a gallblad- the harmonization of diagnostic criteria of hepatic lesions in der. The right lobe has an anterior and posterior component laboratory rats and mice. These recommendations for diagnos- and the small caudate lobe consists of two or more disc- tic criteria and preferred terminology should not be considered like sublobes (See Figure 1). mandatory; proper diagnoses are ultimately based on the dis- Nomenclature for liver lobes varies among species and cretion of the toxicologic study pathologist. sometimes among authors. A table showing differences in liver The INHAND (International Harmonization of Nomenclature lobes between species is included based on current anatomic and Diagnostic Criteria for Lesions in Rats and Mice) initiative features (Table 1). creates a framework for the harmonization of diagnostic nomen- clature (classification of lesions using the same terminology) in III. HISTOMORPHOLOGY different rodent organ systems. It is a joint initiative between Societies from the United States (STP), Great Britain (BSTP), The two-dimensional microarchitecture of the liver has Japan (JSTP), and European countries (ESTP). been categorized in at least three perspectives (Figure 2). The This document is organized to provide introductory material anatomic model is the classical lobule, a hexagonal structure that reviews comparative interspecies differences in anatomy divided into concentric centrilobular, midzonal, and peripor- and liver function, followed by a listing of liver lesions in a tal segments. The triangular portal lobule is based on bile standardized format. The liver lesions descriptions include dif- flow and is centered on the portal triad (portal canal). The ferential diagnoses to aid in distinguishing primary diagnoses elliptical or diamond shaped liver acinus is a functional sub- from similar appearing lesions. Throughout the document, unit of the liver. It incorporates blood flow and metabolic comparisons are made with respect to similar liver lesions that functions and is divided in zone 1 (periportal), zone 2 (transi- may occur in humans. It should be noted that the preferred diag- tional; midzonal), and zone 3 (centrilobular). Functionally, nostic terminology for some lesions in this document might zone 1 hepatocytes are specialized for oxidative liver func- represent departures from traditional nomenclature schemes tions such as gluconeogenesis, b-oxidation of fatty acids, and found in standard textbooks. Furthermore, illustrative photomi- cholesterol synthesis, while zone 3 cells are more important crographs for a given diagnostic entity may occasionally depict for glycolysis, lipogenesis, and cytochrome P-450–based additional tissue changes as this reflects actual situations drug detoxification.
Downloaded from tpx.sagepub.com at Society of Toxicologic Pathology on May 21, 2015 Vol. 38, No. 7S, 2010 LESIONS OF THE HEPATOBILIARY SYSTEM 7S
1. Blood Supply and Bile Flow lymphocytes that have natural killer activity and are primarily located in periportal areas (Wright and Stacey 1991). The liver has a dual blood supply, the hepatic portal vein and the hepatic artery. The hepatic artery supplies oxygenated 3. Immunohistochemistry blood. Approximately 75% of the blood is delivered to the liver via the hepatic portal vein that drains the spleen, stomach, Immunohistochemistry (IHC), utilizing fluorescent or chro- intestines, and pancreas. Branches of the hepatic artery and mogen tagged antibodies, is a useful adjunct for identification portal vein are seen in the portal triads along with bile ducts and of different cell types in the liver. Selected examples are pro- are separated from the hepatic cords by a ‘‘limiting plate’’ of vided in Table 2. hepatocytes. The bile ducts join to form the hepatic duct lead- Use of IHC can be helpful for diagnostic purposes and is ing to the small intestine in rats and to the gallbladder in mice. common in human pathology where panels of immunohisto- Blood flows from the portal areas to the central vein in the cen- chemical stains are used for supporting diagnoses. Not all com- ter of each lobule while bile flows from the center of the hepa- mercially available preparations of a given antibody will react tic lobule to the portal areas and on to the hepatic duct. the same way between different laboratories and between different species. Furthermore, expertise is required for 2. Histology tissue handling to unmask cellular antigens that may be cross-linked during tissue fixation. Diagnostic evaluation of The two most commonly used descriptions for the structural immunostains typically requires inclusion of both positive and and functional units of the liver are the hepatic lobule (Kiernan negative controls. The interpretations of IHC results are usually 1883) and the acinus (Rappaport et al., 1954) (Figure 2). The performed in conjunction with histopathological findings and structural unit, the hepatic lobule, is modeled on the blood flow sometimes also with consideration of gross findings and/or within the liver and is commonly used for descriptive pathol- clinical pathology or other relevant study results. ogy and morphological diagnoses. The functional unit, the hepatic acinus, is modeled on blood flow and metabolism IV. PHYSIOLOGY within the liver. More recently a parenchymal unit in the liver has been described as a cone-shaped three-dimensional struc- The liver is responsible for maintenance of many homeo- ture comprised of approximately fourteen hepatic lobules sup- static and physiological functions. Liver size is governed both plied and drained by common vascular tributaries (Malarkey by genetic factors and by the rate of biochemical activity to et al. 2005; Teutsch, Schuerfeld, and Groezinger 1999; Teutsch maintain optimal functional mass. It is an organ system capable 2005). This parenchymal unit more closely explains the ran- of rapid responses to a variety of noxious stimuli. Following dom size and shape distribution of the more classical hepatic loss of hepatocytes from stimuli such as transient toxic insult, lobule as seen in a conventional two-dimensional histology infection, or partial hepatectomy, the liver is rapidly restored slide. It also provides a basis for understanding the heteroge- to its optimal mass to maintain normal function. neous response of various hepatic lobules to chemical insult. Liver functions are complex and diverse including endo- In addition to hepatocytes, the liver is comprised of a variety crine and exocrine activity, metabolism, conjugation, detoxifi- of cell types, including biliary cells, endothelial cells, Kupffer cation, and hematopoiesis in early embryonic and fetal cells, Ito cells (stellate cells), fat-storing cells, and pit cells in development (Harada et al. 1999). The liver is continuously addition to hematopoietic cells in the sinusoids and blood ves- exposed to all ingested substances absorbed through the intest- sels. Polyhedral hepatocytes comprise approximately 60% of inal tract via the portal vein and systemically via the arterial the liver arranged in plates or cords that radiate from the central blood supply. A pivotal hepatic function in toxicologic pathol- vein to the portal areas. In two-dimensional sections they are ogy is xenobiotic biotransformation that leads to detoxification typically one cell layer thick and form anastomoses (Miyai of materials absorbed in the intestinal tract. Xenobiotic 1991). On one surface they are separated from the sinusoidal metabolism by hepatocytes can occur by phase I (often the wall by a peri-sinusoidal space, the space of Disse, where cytochrome oxidase series) and phase II reactions (often the they are exposed to tissue fluids. On the opposite side of formation of the water soluble glucuronide) (Graham and Lake the hepatocyte bile canaliculi are formed with hepatocytes in 2008; Martignoni, Groothuis, and de Kanter 2006). Hepatic an adjacent hepatic cord. Desmosomes, gap junctions, and metabolic processes may also cause indirect toxicity by gener- stud-like protrusions connect contiguous hepatocytes within a ating electrophilic species capable of reacting with proteins, cord. Biliary cells form bile ducts in the portal areas and nucleic acids, and other cytoplasmic organelles (Xu, Li, and constitute the portal triad with a hepatic artery and a portal Kong 2005). Intrinsic and induced enzymes responsible for vein. Fenestrated endothelial cells line the sinusoids and hepatic function may be unevenly distributed throughout the synthesize prostaglandins. Kupffer cells are a self-renewing hepatic lobule and between the different lobes (Greaves 2007). fixed macrophage comprising approximately 10% of all liver The presence of background changes and undercurrent dis- cells (Eustis et al. 1990). Kupffer cells are phagocytic, secrete ease states affects the hepatic and biliary morphology, for mediators of inflammation, and catabolize lipids and proteins. Ito example, caloric restriction diminishes hepatocellular size and cells (stellate cells) are peri-sinusoidal cells that store vitamin A can make interpretation of test-article–related changes more and are also a major source of collagen in the liver. Pit cells are challenging. Other factors that influence the liver morphology
Downloaded from tpx.sagepub.com at Society of Toxicologic Pathology on May 21, 2015 8S THOOLEN ET AL. TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
TABLE 2.—Selected immunohistochemical stains that have been Most toxicologic pathologists use a common grading scale used to identify different cell types in liver sections. such as marginal or minimal, slight, moderate, marked, and severe for inflammatory, necrotizing, or other degenerative and Immunohistochemical stains of liver cells responsive lesions. Tissue-specific locators are often used, such Cell type Antibody as portal, periportal, midzonal, centrilobular, hilar, ductal, peri- ductal, peri-canalicular, or subcapsular to indicate the lesion Hepatocytes CK8, CK18 distribution within the liver. Focal, multifocal, and diffuse are Bile canaliculi Polyclonal CEA Bile duct epithelium CK7, CK19, AE1/AE3 commonly used modifiers in the morphological diagnosis for Endothelial cell Factor VIII, CD31, CD34 distribution parameters. Based on the formal definition, a focal Exudate macrophages (monocytes) ED1 lesion refers to one specific area, or focus, whereas multifocal Kupffer cells CD68, F4/80, ED2, SRA-E5 refers to more than one focus (foci). However, some patholo- Hepatic stellate cells (activated), a-SMA gists use focal for both focal and multifocal, referring to the myofibroblasts and smooth muscle cells Dendritic cells NLDC-145, OX-6 nature of the lesion rather than its actual distribution and using Oval cells a-fetoprotein (AFP), CK20 grading to reflect the extent of the multifocality. Schemes for Apoptosis Bcl-2, Caspase 3 and 7 scoring lesion severity vary widely and no single system is Proliferation markers Ki67/MIB-1, PCNA likely to be accepted by all pathologists. While a sample grad- ing scheme for focal and multifocal liver lesions is provided in Geller, Dahll, and Alsabeh (2008); Malhotra, Sakhuja, and Gondal (2004); Hurlimann and Gardiol (1991); Davenport et al. (2001); Kashiwagi, Kaidoh, and Inoue´(2001); Faa Table 3, this should not be regarded as a universal or specific et al. (1998). INHAND-recommended grading scheme. are: body weight loss, blood flow, food intake, vascular and TABLE 3.—A sample grading scheme for focal and multifocal hemodynamic changes, timing and duration of exposure, with- liver lesions (modified from Hardisty and Eustis 1990; World drawal effects, and functional heterogeneity. Functional hetero- Health Organization 1978; Derelanko 2000). geneity expresses itself via differences in metabolism, oxygen supply, b-oxidation, amino acid metabolism, gluconeogenesis, Proportion of Quantifiable glycolysis, ureagenesis, liponeogenesis, and bile acid and biliru- Severity liver affected Grade finding bin secretion. These factors can affect occurrence of nonproli- Marginal or minimal Very small amount 1 1-2 foci ferative as well as proliferative liver lesions in rodents. Slight or few Small amount 2 3-6 foci Moderate or several Medium amount 3 7-12 foci Marked or many Large amount 4 >12 foci V. LIVER NECROPSY AND TRIMMING PROTOCOL Severe Very large amount 5 Diffuse At necropsy, rat and mouse liver may be weighed and individual liver lobes examined carefully for gross lesions. In VII. NOMENCLATURE,DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA, AND DIFFERENTIAL conventional preclinical rodent studies, gross lesions must be DIAGNOSIS correlated with the histopathological findings. Liver-specific A. Congenital Lesions trimming protocols (see Figure 1) according to standard oper- ating procedures (SOPs) are used (e.g., see Ruehl-Fehlert Introduction et al. 2003). Dissected lobes and trimmed liver pieces can be Developmental anomalies occasionally occur in the liver of fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (no more than 1 cm rodents. These malformations might be expressed in different thick in 1:10 tissue: formalin). forms and be of different origin. They mostly occur as isolated effects and are considered by the pathologist in distinguishing VI. GRADING OF LIVER LESIONS background hepatic lesions versus xenobiotic-induced lesions Interpretation of hepatic lesions in safety assessment studies that occur in rodent preclinical toxicity studies. requires consideration of gross and microscopic findings, hematology, clinical chemistry, and liver weights in the con- Hepatodiaphragmatic Nodule (Figures 3 and 4) current control groups of animals and should take into account Pathogenesis: Developmental alteration. species and strain, age, caging, diet, and tissue sampling. Many pathologists use a grading system to document lesion Diagnostic features: severity. In toxicological pathology, the generation of ordinal data using a scoring system allows statistical analysis for Visible grossly and tinctorially similar to normal effects and trends (Gad and Rousseaux 2002). However, not all hepatic parenchyma. grading systems are the same and may differ in how they incor- Rounded extensions usually of the medial lobe(s). porate distribution, stage, and extent of lesions. The problem of Increased mitoses, cytological alterations, and harmonization as it relates to lesion severity has been recog- nuclear alterations may be present. nized and discussed in some detail (Hardisty and Eustis Linear chromatin structures with small lateral projec- 1990; World Health Organization 1978). tions are pathognostic.
Downloaded from tpx.sagepub.com at Society of Toxicologic Pathology on May 21, 2015 Vol. 38, No. 7S, 2010 LESIONS OF THE HEPATOBILIARY SYSTEM 9S
Differential diagnosis: adaptive changes usually do not result in illness or death of rodents. Often these processes are dose and chemical related. Hepatocellular focus of cellular alteration—tinctorial variation from normal parenchyma and does not pro- trude into the diaphragm. Fatty Change Hepatocellular neoplasia—when visible grossly does Synonyms/subtypes: Lipidosis, vacuolation, lipid, macrovesi- not protrude into the thoracic cavity. cular and/or microvesicular steatosis, phospholipidosis.1 Regenerative hyperplastic nodule (nodular hyperplasia)—typically involves multiple nodules of Pathogenesis: Perturbations in lipid metabolism and disposition. hyperplasia separated by proliferative bands of oval cells or connective tissue. Diagnostic features: Macrovesicular fatty change (Figures 5 and 6). Comment: Hepatodiaphragmatic nodules can be seen in rats at any age and their occurrence in fetuses is considered presump- Hepatocytes contain a large well-defined single tive evidence of a congenital origin. While they appear to be rounded vacuole within each cell. protruding through the diaphragm and extending into the thor- Nucleus and cytoplasm displaced to the periphery. acic cavity, they actually are attached to and covered by a thin A few hepatocytes may contain one or more smaller fibrous portion of the diaphragm (Eustis et al. 1990). vacuoles. An incidence ranging from 1% to 11% has been reported for Microvesicular fatty change (Figure 7). hepatodiaphragmatic nodules in Fischer 344 rats (Eustis et al. 1990), with few cases reported in other rat stocks and strains. Hepatocytes partially or completely filled with Mice do not develop such nodules but may have focal lesions numerous small lipid vacuoles. similar to those in rat hepatodiaphragmatic nodules and with Affected hepatocytes may have a ‘‘foamy’’ appearance. large nuclei with large central nucleoli-like basophilic bodies. Small vacuoles do not normally displace the nucleus to the periphery in contrast to macrovesicular steatosis.
B. Hepatocellular Responses, Cellular Degeneration, Differential diagnosis: Injury, and Death Hydropic degeneration—clear cytoplasm without Introduction nuclear displacement. The function and structure of most liver cells are Glycogen accumulation—irregular and poorly defined relatively constrained by their genetic programs of metabolism, lacy clear spaces in the cytoplasm (rarefaction) usually differentiation, and specialization. While the cells of the hepatic with centrally located nuclei. parenchyma have the flexibility to adapt to changing physiologi- cal demands with reversible functional and morphological altera- Comment: There is a difference in preferred nomenclature tions, sufficient stress, or noxious stimuli may lead to inability to among pathologists for this change. Based strictly on an maintain homeostasis and adverse cellular adaptations. The mor- H&E-stained section, a diagnosis of cytoplasmic vacuolation phological response to injurious stimuli depends on the nature of of hepatocytes is a universally acceptable descriptive diagno- the injury and its severity and duration. Often at high doses, tar- sis. Based on the experience of the observer, the specific mor- geted cells go through a sequence of cellular degeneration fol- phological features of the cytoplasmic vacuolation may be lowed by cell death, but at lower doses degenerative changes sufficiently consistent with intracytoplasmic lipid accumula- do not necessarily lead to cell death. Consequentially, cellular tion to warrant a presumptive diagnosis of fatty change. The changes that do not lead to cell death or death of the animal may unequivocal demonstration of intracytoplasmic fat, however, be called ‘‘adaptive’’ changes that can be considered either requires a special stain. adverse or not adverse reactions, depending on the nature of the Fatty change can be induced by a number of different agents change. There are cellular adaptations involving metabolic or and is usually divided into two main types, namely, microvesi- functional alterations that lead to increases in cellular organelles cular and macrovesicular, although mixed forms can frequently and intracellular accumulations of a variety of endogenous and be observed (Greaves 2007; Gopinath, Prentice, and Lewis exogenous substances but allow the cell and animal to survive 1987; Goodman and Ishak 2006; Kanel and Korula 2005). and often live normally. Similar changes may occur in human Macrovesicular lipidosis is a reaction to a wide variety of liver, such as cholestasis, a common lesion in human liver injuries and can also be regarded as a physiological adapta- after long-term drug therapy. However, in animals, when the tiondemonstratedasanimbalancebetweenuptakeoflipids limits of adaptive responses are exceeded or do not occur in from blood and secretion of lipoproteins by the hepatocyte response to chemical exposure, irreversible cellular injury and (Goodman and Ishak 2006). Microvesicular lipidosis is usually cellular death occurs, with possible subsequent illness and death. Adaptive changes or doses of chemicals that induce 1 Electron microscopy or special staining needed for a definitive diagnosis.
Downloaded from tpx.sagepub.com at Society of Toxicologic Pathology on May 21, 2015 10S THOOLEN ET AL. TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY indicative of more serious hepatic dysfunction but can also Differential diagnosis: result from nutritional disturbances (Greaves 2007). Specific xenobiotics can induce either macrovesicular or Fatty change—round clear vacuoles tend to be single microvesicular lipidosis in humans (Kanel and Korula 2005). or multiple and discrete. In animal studies, it is common to see a mixture of macrovesi- Glycogen accumulation—irregular and poorly cular and microvesicular lipidosis. In those situations one can defined clear spaces in the cytoplasm (rarefaction) either diagnose the most prevalent form or record the findings usually with centrally located nuclei; positive stained as mixed. Commentary in the pathology narrative report might with periodic acid-Schiff staining. be appropriate, especially if recording the most prevalent form of lipidosis. Liver with admixed presence of glycogen and fatty Comment: Definitive diagnosis of phospholipidosis is not pos- change can be observed (Figures 8 and 9). sible based strictly on H&E-stained liver sections. A diagnosis Fatty change and necrosis may appear together although of cytoplasmic vacuolation of hepatocytes will typically be an they may differ in proportion. A number of causes other than acceptable descriptive diagnosis. Since the cytoplasmic xenobiotic exposure, such as chronic hepatic injury, diet, vacuolation may mimic microvesicular fatty change, a descrip- metabolic and hormonal status, debilitation of animals, and tive diagnosis of cytoplasmic vacuolation is recommended in fasting before necropsy, should be taken into consideration the absence of electron microscopy or special immunostaining. in reviewing these changes (Vollmar et al. 1999; Katoh and Phospholipidosis can be induced by xenobiotics with a Sugimoto 1982; Nagano et al. 2007; Denda et al. 2002). The cationic amphophilic structure (Halliwell 1997; Anderson and distribution can be either diffuse (e.g., ethionine) or zonal Borlak 2006; Reasor, Hastings, and Ulrich 2006; Chatman (e.g., centrilobular in CCl4; periportal in phosphorus toxicity; et al. 2009) (Figures 14 and 15). It is a lipid storage disorder midzonal in choline deficiency). Inadequate fixation proce- seen when complexes between xenobiotics and phospholipids dures may sometimes give rise to artifacts with microvesicu- accumulate within lysosomes. Phospholipidosis refers to a spe- lar vacuolation, although mostly with less clear cytoplasm cific form of hepatic vacuolation with the occurrence of con- (Li et al. 2003). centric membrane bound lysosomal myeloid bodies/lamellar Focal fatty change can sometimes be seen spontaneously and bodies that can be confirmed by specific staining and electron is usually described as such. A specific variation occurs near the microscopy (Hruban, Slesers, and Hopkins 1972; Obert et al. attachment of the falciform ligament and gallbladder in mice and 2007) (Figure 16). Definitive diagnosis requires electron is referred to as ‘‘tension lipidosis’’ (Harada et al. 1999) (Figures microscopy or positive immunostaining. Immunohistochem- 10 and 11). Spontaneous fatty change can differ between strains ical staining for a lysosomal-associated protein and adipophilin and is a normal finding in BALB mice. Livers of these mice are may be used to differentiate phospholipidosis from conven- typically paler than in other strains. Focal fatty change in the tional fatty change (Obert et al. 2007). Both preexisting neutral liver of rodents has previously been categorized as vacuolated fat and phospholipids can be observed in combination. The altered hepatic foci (Eustis et al. 1990), but current practice is macrovesicular and the microvesicular fatty change (vacuola- to diagnose this change as focal fatty change rather than as a tion) generally located at the cell periphery stains positively for focus of hepatic alteration (Figures 12 and 13). Oil Red-O and the membranes surrounding these lipid Fatty change can also be observed in combination with other vacuoles stain positively for adipophilin (a protein that forms hepatotoxic injuries (e.g., chronic liver toxicity, degeneration, the membrane around non-lysosomal lipid droplets) but neg- inflammation, and necrosis) or nutritional disturbance (e.g., ative for LAMP-2 (a lysosome-associated protein) by immu- diet, vitamin A excess) in both animals and man. Special stains nohistochemical techniques (Obert et al. 2007). This indicates on cryostat sections can demonstrate fat (e.g., Oil red O or that this vacuolation was due to accumulation of non- Sudan Black) (Jones 2002). lysosomal neutral lipid. Cytoplasmic microvesiculation located centrally in hepatocytes that exhibit positive immuno- histochemical staining for LAMP-2 (Figure 17) but is nega- Phospholipidosis2 tive for Oil-Red-O and adipophilin is indicative of phospholipid accumulation (Obert et al. 2007). Synonym: Cytoplasmic vacuolation, foam cells. Amyloidosis (Figures 18 and 19) Pathogenesis: Induced by xenobiotics with a cationic ampho- philic structure. Pathogenesis: Cellular process related to misfolding of protein. Diagnostic features: Diagnostic features: