DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF Document Parker-LORD General Aviation Application Guide/Engine Mount Selector Version 1: January 31, 2020 For further assistance contact: [email protected] Please specify aircraft manufacturer, model, and engine variation in email requests Description or Engine HP or Lord Part No. per MODEL Popular Name or SERIAL No. Location Manufacturer Make and Model Thrust Number A/C Notes Aviat S-1 Pitts Special 1 Lyc O-320 160 J-7401-2 8 * S dwg similar but not exact to this installation, Aviat provides spacer Aviat S-1S Pitts Special 1 Lyc IO-360-B4A 180 J-7401-2 8 * S dwg similar but not exact to this installation, Aviat provides spacer 1 Lyc IO-360-B4A or 180 or S-2A Pitts Special J-7401-2 8 Aviat AEIO-A1A or -A1E 200 * S dwg similar but not exact to this installation, Aviat provides spacer Bellanca (now Alexandria Aircraft) 17-30A S/N30847 up 1 Con. IO-520-D, K 300 J-12453-1 1 rear Bellanca (now Alexandria Aircraft) 17-30A S/N30847 up 1 Con. IO-520-D, K 300 J-12453-2 1 front Bellanca (now Alexandria Aircraft) 17-31, 17-31A Viking 300, 300A 1 Lyc IO-540-K 300 J-9868-5 4 Bellanca (now Alexandria Aircraft) 17-31A Super Viking 1 Lyc IO-540-KIE5 300 J-9868-5 4 Bellanca (now Alexandria Aircraft) 17-31TC, Turbo-Viking 1 Lyc IO-540-G,K 300 J-9868-5 4 Bellanca (now Alexandria Aircraft) 17-31ATC Turbo-Viking 1 Lyc IO-540-G 300 J-9868-5 4 Bellanca (now Alexandria Aircraft) 7ECA Citabria (1967 ON) 1 Lyc O-235-C1 115 J-6230-1 4 * S dwg similar but not exact to this installation. Lord mounts not original equipment on this aircraft; J-6230-1 recommended as replacement part by Bellanca. Bellanca (now Alexandria Aircraft) 7GCAA Citabria 1 Lyc O-320-A2B 150 J-6230-1 4 Lord mounts not original equipment on this aircraft; J-6230-1 recommended as replacement part by Bellanca. Bellanca (now Alexandria Aircraft) 7GCBC Citabria 150, 1 Lyc O-320-A2D 150 J-6230-1 4 Bellanca (now Alexandria Aircraft) 7KCAB Citabria 1 Lyc IO-320-E2A 150 J-6230-1 4 Bellanca (now Alexandria Aircraft) 8GCBC-CS Scout (1978) 1 Lyc O-360-CIE 180 J-6230-1 4 * S dwg similar but not exact to this installation. Lord mounts not original equipment on this aircraft; J-6230-1 recommended as replacement part by Bellanca. Bellanca Champ, Citabria, and Lancer formerly produced by Champion Aircraft. Bellanca (now Alexandria Aircraft) 8GCBC-FP Scout (1978) 1 Lyc O-360-C2E 180 J-6230-1 4 * S dwg similar but not exact to this installation. Bellanca Champ, Citabria, and Lancer formerly produced by Champion Aircraft. Bellanca (now Alexandria Aircraft) 8GCBC Scout (1978) 1 Lyc O-360-C2E 180 J-6230-1 4 * S dwg similar but not exact to this installation. Bellanca Champ, Citabria, and Lancer formerly produced by Champion Aircraft. Bellanca (now Alexandria Aircraft) 8KCAB Citabria 1 Lyc IO-320-ElA 150 J-6230-1 4 Lord mounts not original equipment on this aircraft; J-6230-1 recommended as replacement part by Bellanca. Bellanca (now Alexandria Aircraft) 8KCAB-CS Decathlon CS(1978) 1 Lyc AEIO-320-ElB 150 J-6230-1 4 * S dwg similar but not exact to this installation Bellanca (now Alexandria Aircraft) 8KCAB-FP Decathlon (1978) 1 Lyc AEIO-320-E2B 150 J-6230-1 4 * S dwg similar but not exact to this installation Bellanca (now Alexandria Aircraft) 8KCAB-180 Super Decath. 1978 1 Lyc AEIO-360-HlA 180 J-6230-1 4 * S dwg similar but not exact to this installation BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 727-200 AiResearch GTC 89-98 J-11339-8 3 APU Mount BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 727-200-series Accessory Mtg HT0-1 737-100/200/200C/300/ Accessory Mount HT0-7 BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 400/500 2 GE CFM-56-3B-1, - 737-300/400/500 2 Aft Mount BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 3B-2, -3C-1, -4 LM-321-SA19 BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 737-300/400/500 J-11339-9 3 APU Mount 2 GE CFM-56-3B-1, - 737-300/400/500 LM-321-118 4 Front BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 3B-2, -3C-1, -4 fwd engine mount, 2 per engine BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 737-300/400/500 Thrust Reverser LM-321-62 & -97 4 EA. BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 737-300/400/500 CFM 56-3 Engine Fan Blade Damper J-23675-1* *Limited availability, contact LORD Aerospace Technical Support for details 737- 200/300/400/500/600/700/ Accessory Mount HT11411-15 BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 800 Top BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 747-100/200/300/400/400D APU Mount LM-714-SA1* 1 *Limited availability, contact LORD Aerospace Technical Support for details Front Bottom 747-100/200/300/400/400D APU Mount LM-714-SA2* 1 BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) Front *Limited availability, contact LORD Aerospace Technical Support for details BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 747-100/200/300/400/400D APU Mount LM-714-SA3* 1 Rear *Limited availability, contact LORD Aerospace Technical Support for details BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 747-400,400D Accessory Mtg AM-002-7 757-200, later 737- Thrust Reverser LM-433-40 8 BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 300/400/500 Later Boeing 737-300/-400/-500 changed to the LM-433-40 to extend the life over the LM-321-62 and -97 BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 757-200 PW 2000 LM-433-SA17 2 EA. Aft Mount Replaced by LM-433-SA37 BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 757-200 PW 2000 LM-433-SA28 2 EA. Front Replaced by LM-433-SA28A BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 757-200 PW 2000 LM-433-SA28A 2 EA. Front Replaced by LM-433-SA43 if the airline bought the Service Bulletin from Boeing BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 757-200 PW 2000 LM-433-SA37 2 EA Aft Mount BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 757-200 PW 2000 LM-433-SA42 2 EA. Front Replaced by LM-433-SA43 BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 757-200 PW 2000 LM-433-SA43 2 EA. Front In order to put the -SA43 on the aircraft, the Airline has to buy the Service Bulletin from Boeing BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 767-200 Accessory Mount J-19235-1 Hyd Pump Mount, replaced by -3 BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 767-200/300 PW 4000 series LM-434-SA14M 2 Aft Mount SA14M was replaced by the -SA14M-1 with heat shield LM-434-SA14M- 767-200/300 PW 4000 series 2 Aft Mount BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 1 SA14M was replaced by the -SA14M-1 with heat shield BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 767-200 & -300 Accessory Mount RA-75-3-1 & -2 2 Baggage Storage Bin Mount BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 767-200 & -300 Accessory Mount RA-75-4-1 & -2* 2 Baggage Storage Bin Mount. *Limited availability, contact LORD Aerospace Technical Support for details BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 767-200 & -300 Accessory Mount RA-80-7-1 & -2* 2 Baggage Storage Bin Mount. *Limited availability, contact LORD Aerospace Technical Support for details BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 767-200 & -300 Accessory Mount RA-80-8-1 & -2* 2 Baggage Storage Bin Mount. *Limited availability, contact LORD Aerospace Technical Support for details BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 767-200 & -300 Accessory Mount RA-80-9-1 & -2 2 Baggage Storage Bin Mount BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 767-200 & -300 Accessory Mount RA-90-10-1 & -2 2 Baggage Storage Bin Mount BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 767-200 & -300 Accessory Mount RA-90-12-1 & -2 2 Baggage Storage Bin Mount BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 767-200 & -300 Accessory Mount RA-90-13-1 & -2 2 Baggage Storage Bin Mount BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 767-400ER Shockmount J-23167-15 Hyd Pump Mount 767-200/ 300/ 300F/ Accessory Mtg J-19235-3 BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft DC9, MD80, MD90, CH46, CH47) 400ER Hyd Pump Mount, replaced the -1 BOEING (Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas & Vertol including aircraft
Load more

Recommended publications
  • No Surprises Here
    REPORT 2009 BUSINESS AIRCRAFT FLEET US were having a fire sale trying to NO SURPRISES HERE quickly get rid of their business air- craft in order to avoid government and public scrutiny, countries like Brazil were turning to Business Aviation as a business solution. The result – well, we think the numbers speak for them- selves. So yes, 2009 was a slow year for Business Aviation – as expected. The World Fleet continued to grow, although at a much slower rate than past years (the world fleet grew by seven percent last year, in comparison to this year’s 4.8 percent). And yes, Europe may have been a surprise as it navigated the crisis fairly well, but only saw a 9.7 percent increase in its fleet, which although strong is almost half the size of last year’s world-lead- ing 18 percent. But the slowdowns in Europe and the US are made up for by the 15.3, 27.1 and 13.3 percent growth rates in Africa, Asia/Middle East and South America respectively. FLEET TOTALS Ok, so we changed our minds about (As of End 2009) 2009. Business Aviation is not slowing World Fleet 29,992 down. Business Aviation is simply European Fleet 3,959 changing, shifting and going where Jet Aircraft Worldwide 17,118 business goes – building new Turboprops Worldwide 12,499 economies and ensuring that business gets done. By Nick Klenske ust take a brief glance at the Overview J numbers and it should be blatant- Let us start from the end – or as close No surprise here.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Tire Data
    Aircraft tire Engineering Data Introduction Michelin manufactures a wide variety of sizes and types of tires to the exacting standards of the aircraft industry. The information included in this Data Book has been put together as an engineering and technical reference to support the users of Michelin tires. The data is, to the best of our knowledge, accurate and complete at the time of publication. To be as useful a reference tool as possible, we have chosen to include data on as many industry tire sizes as possible. Particular sizes may not be currently available from Michelin. It is advised that all critical data be verified with your Michelin representative prior to making final tire selections. The data contained herein should be used in conjunction with the various standards ; T&RA1, ETRTO2, MIL-PRF- 50413, AIR 8505 - A4 or with the airframer specifications or military design drawings. For those instances where a contradiction exists between T&RA and ETRTO, the T&RA standard has been referenced. In some cases, a tire is used for both civil and military applications. In most cases they follow the same standard. Where they do not, data for both tires are listed and identified. The aircraft application information provided in the tables is based on the most current information supplied by airframe manufacturers and/or contained in published documents. It is intended for use as general reference only. Your requirements may vary depending on the actual configuration of your aircraft. Accordingly, inquiries regarding specific models of aircraft should be directed to the applicable airframe manufacturer.
    [Show full text]
  • ATP® Libraries Catalog
    2 ATP® Libraries Catalog Revision Date May 24 2016 ATP 101 South Hill Drive Brisbane, CA 94005 (+1) 415-330-9500 www.atp.com ATP® Policies and Legal www.atp.com/policy © Copyright 2016, ATP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of ATP. The information in this catalog is subject to change without notice.ATP, ATP Knowledge, ATP Aviation Hub, HubConnect, NavigatorV, and their respective logos, are among the registered trademarks or trademarks of ATP. All third-party trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners and ATP asserts no ownership rights to these items. iPad and iPhone are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. All original authorship of ATP is protected under U.S. and foreign copyrights and is subject to written license agreements between ATP and its subscribers. Visit www.atp.com/policy for more information ATP Customer Support Please visit www.atp.com/support for customer support information ATP® Libraries Catalog – Revision Date: May 24 2016 3 CONTENTS CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 REGULATORY LIBRARIES .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • April 2019 Vol
    BUSINESS & COMMERCIAL AVIATION PILOT REPORT: GLOBAL 7500 CABIN APRIL 2019 $10.00 www.bcadigital.com Business & Commercial Aviation PILOT REPORT OZONE WORK/LIFE BALANCE APRIL 2019 VOL. 115 NO. 4 Global 7500 A bespoke, personal flying flagship without equal ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Bad Ideas Distracted, Disoriented and Wrongly Determined Balancing Work and Life in Business Aviation Cabin Ozone Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Strike Damage & Windshield Bird Strike Final Report
    COMMERCIAL-IN-CONFIDENCE Bird Strike Damage & Windshield Bird Strike Final Report 5078609-rep-03 Version 1.1 EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY COMMERCIAL-IN-CONFIDENCE COMMERCIAL-IN-CONFIDENCE Approval & Authorisation Prepared by: N Dennis (fera) D Lyle Approved for issue R Budgey (fera) by: P Kirrane Authorised for issue A M Whitehead by: Record of Revisions Version Description of Revision 0.1 First Draft for review by EASA 0.2 Second Draft responding to EASA Comments 1.0 Draft Final Report 1.1 Final Report This document was created by Atkins Limited and the Food & Environment Research Agency under Contract Number EASA.2008.C49 Copyright vests in the European Community. ATKINS Limited The Barbican, East Street, Farnham, Surrey GU9 7TB Tel: +44 1252 738500 Fax: +44 1252 717065 www.atkinsglobal.com 5078609-rep-03, Version 1.1 Page 2 COMMERCIAL-IN-CONFIDENCE COMMERCIAL-IN-CONFIDENCE Executive Summary Background to the Study This report presents the findings of a study carried out by Atkins and the UK Food & Environment Research Agency (FERA). The study was commissioned in 2009 by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), under contract number EASA.2008.C49 [1.]. Its aim was to investigate the adequacy of the current aircraft certification requirement in relation to current and future bird strike risks on aircraft structures and windshields. Bird strikes are random events. The intersection of bird and aircraft flight paths, the mass of the bird and the part of the aircraft struck are all random elements that will determine the outcome. In managing risk all that can be controlled are the design and testing of the aircraft driven by certification specifications, the aircraft’s flight profile and, to a limited extent, the populations of birds near airports.
    [Show full text]
  • SSK 0980 Rev 1.Fm
    2b LEARJET 23/24/25, 28/29, 35/36 APPROVEDWHITEIN RT 0980 Revision Transmittal Sheet This page transmits Revision 1 to SSK 0980, “Replacement of Air Conditioning Evaporator Assembly”. Rework: No rework is required for aircraft which have complied with previous issues of this document. Summary: This revision adds clamp part number MS21919WDG20 as an alternate to MS21919DG20, removes the 7600122-3 evaporator assembly from the 2499002-2, -3, -4, and -010 kits, and adds the AN919-15D reducer to the 2499002-2 and -010 kits. The kit prices are updated. NOTE: Change bars are placed in the left margin of pages where significant changes are located. This revision incorporates the latest document format for Learjet service instructions. The general arrangement of this document may change from the previous issue. Description of Changes In the Planning Information section: Changed the Material Required information section as follows: Updated the 2499002-1 thru -010 kit pricing. In the Material Information section: Changed the 2499002-1 and -009 kit information as follows: Removed Model 25 aircraft serials that were never built, and removed reference to Model 25F. Changed the 2499002-1, -2, -3, -4, -009, and -010 kit information as follows: Added alternate part number clamp. Changed the 2499002-2, -3, -4, and -010 kit information as follows: Moved the 7600122-3 evaporator assembly to the “Other materials/parts necessary” table. Changed the 2499002-2 and -010 kit information as follows: Added the AN919-15D reducer. Filing Instructions: This is a COMPLETE revision. Remove and discard all pages of the prior issue and replace them with pages of Revision 1.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2019 Vol
    BUSINESS & COMMERCIAL AVIATION TRACING THE SINGLE-ENGINE TURBOPROP UNRELIABLE AIRSPEED READI MAY 2019 $10.00 www.bcadigital.com ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Unreliable Airspeed Readings Business & Commercial Aviation Operating Into Moscow Staying on Glidepath Incapable of Flight NGS STAYING ON GLIDEPATH MAY 2019 VOL. 115 NO. 5 Tracing the Single- Engine Turboprop Novelty aircraft become business assets Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • Fsd Mar93.Pdf
    During Adverse Conditions, Decelerating to Stop Demands More from Crew and Aircraft Hydroplaning, gusting cross winds and mechanical failures are only a few of the factors that contribute to runway overrun accidents and incidents after landing or rejecting a takeoff. Improvements in tire design, runway construction and aircraft systems reduce risks, but crew training remains the most important tool to stop safely. by Jack L. King Aviation Consultant Decelerating an aircraft to a stop on a runway traction during wet-weather operations and can become significantly more critical in ad- the use of anti-skid braking devices, coupled verse conditions, such as heavy rain in mar- with high-pressure tires, has reduced greatly ginal visibility with gusting cross winds. Add the risk of hydroplaning. Still, accident and the surprise of a malfunction, which requires incident statistics confirm that several major a high-speed rejected takeoff (RTO) or a con- runway overrun accidents each year are caused trolled stop after a touchdown on a slightly by unsuccessful braking involving either a high- flooded runway, and a flight crew is challenged speed landing or an RTO on a wet runway to prevent an off-runway excursion. surface; the factors involved in decelerating to a controlled stop are very similar in these Research findings and technological advances two situations. in recent years have helped alleviate, but not eliminate, the hazards associated with takeoff Overrun Accidents and landing in adverse weather. The U.S. Na- tional Aeronautics and Space Administration Continue to Occur (NASA) and the U.S. Federal Aviation Admin- istration (FAA) conducted specialized tests on A recent Boeing Company study reported that tire spin-up speeds after touchdown rather than during 30 years of jet transport service there spin-down speeds in rollout that confirm that have been 48 runway overrun accidents with hydroplaning occurs at substantially lower more than 400 fatalities resulting from RTOs speeds than noted previously.
    [Show full text]
  • Business & Commercial Aviation
    JUNE/JULY 2020 $10.00 AviationWeek.com/BCA Business & Commercial Aviation 2020 PURCHASE PLANNING HANDBOOK Production Aircraft Comparison A Look at the Trends and New AND Performance Tables Developments in Avionics ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Bombardier Global 7500 Smoke Signals Under Pressure Mountain Wave Monsters One Too Many Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • Ntsb/Aar-82-04
    .. PB82-910404 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT .SKY TRAIN AIR, INC. GATES LEARJET 24, N44CJ FELT, OKLAHOMA OCTOBER 1, 1981 2' 1 NTSB-AAR-82-4 0, I UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE . Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB-AAR-82-4 PB82-910404 . Tit le and Subtitle Aviation Accident Report--Sky 5.Report Date Train Air, Inc., Gates Learjet 24, N44CJ, Felt, May 18,1982 Oklahoma, October 1, 1981. 6.Performing- Organization- Code , . Author(s) 8.Performing Organization ~ Report No. 88 National Transportation Safety Board 3435A Bureau of Accident Investigation 11.Contract or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20594 13.Type of Report and Period Covered 2.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Aircraft Accident Report October, 1, 1981 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD - Washington, 0. C. 20594 14.Sponsoring Agency Code 5.Supplcmentrry Notes l6.AbstractAbout 1502 c.d.t., on October 1, 1981, a Sky Train Air, Inc., Learjet 24, N44CJ, crashed 2.5 miles southwest of Felt, Oklahoma. The flightcrew and one passenger, the only occupants on board, were killed. At 1449:39, while in cruise flight at Flight Level 450, en route to McAllen, Texas, from Casper, Wyoming, the flightcrew made initial contact with the Albuquerque Air Route Traffic Control Center. About 1 minute later, the flightcrew failed to respond to a frequency change instruction and the aircraft's transponder beacon code was lost. The controller made several attempts to contact the aircraft but to no avail. Witnesses at Felt heard an aircraft overhead at a very high speed; one witness who saw the aircraft momentarily, stated it was in I a descent angle of about 45'before it struck the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Daily Overnight Hangar Fee List
    SOUTHWEST OREGON REGIONAL AIRPORT "OTH" AIRCRAFT DAILY OVERNIGHT HANGAR FEE LIST Rate I Rate II Rate III Rate IV $40 $70 $90 $110 Overnight Hangar FEE Overnight Hangar FEE Overnight Hangar FEE Overnight Hangar FEE Beech Bonanza 33/35/36 Beech Baron 55/56 Beech Duke 60 Beech King Air 100 Cessna 150/152 Beech Baron 58 Beech King Air 90 Beech King Air 200 Cessna 172 Cessna 340 Beech Queen Air 65/70/80/88 Beech King Air 300 Cessna 180 Cessna 336/337 Cessna Chancellor 414 Beech King Air 350 Cessna 182 Cessna Crusader 303 Cessna Businessliner 402 Beech Regional Airship Cessna 190 Partenavia P68 Cessna Conquest 441 Beech StarShip Cessna 205 Piper PA-60 Cessna Corsair 425 Dash 8 200/400 Cessna 206 Piper PA-30 Cessna Titan 404 Dash 8 400 Cessna Cardinal 177 Piper PA-23 Cessna Golden Eagle 421 Merlin 226/227/300 Cessna Centurion 210 Cessna 310 Piper PA-31 Metroliner Mooney M20 TBM 700 Piper PA-42 Piper Arrow Piper PA-31T Piper PA-28 Piaggio Avanti P180 Piper PA-32 Piaggio P166 Piper PA-24 Rockwell AC-690 Piper Lance Mitsubishi Marquise Piper PA-46 BAE 31 Jetstream Piper PA-25 Pilatus PC-12 Piper PA-44 Cessna 208 Piper PA-22 Eclipse EA500 Piper PA-18 EMB 500 Piper PA-34 Cessna 510 Piper PA-38 Rate V Rate VI Rate VII Hangar Overnight Fee @ $0.057 Sq ft Hangar Overnight Fee @ $0.057 Sq ft Hangar Overnight Fee @ $0.057 Sq ft Cessna Cit. 550/560 - $135/$170 Hawker 700/750 - $130 Canadair CL-300 - $240 EMB 190 - $635 Cessna Citation 525/525B - $110 Hawker 800/850 - $130/$155 Canadair CL-600 - $250 Gulfstream V - $505 Cessna Citation 500/501 - $115 Hawker
    [Show full text]
  • SUBJECT: February 2, 2017 Mark Reichin Propeller Airports LLC Paul
    DATE: February 2, 2017 TO: Mark Reichin Propeller Airports LLC FROM: Paul Dunholter, P.E. BridgeNet International SUBJECT: Snohomish County Airport Commercial Service EA Noise Assessment - Response to Comments BACKGROUND The following memo is a response to the comments outlined in the memo “Recommended revisions to noise analysis in EA/FONSI to support incorporation into SEPA” prepared by Jason Volt on September 16, 2016. The memo listed 12 comments that are addressed below. In addition to the response to the comments, the noise contours from the Environmental Assessment (EA) were updated using the FAA’s new AEDT noise model. The results of contour updates are presented in a separate memo report dated February 1, 2017, “Snohomish County Airport (Paine Field) AEDT Noise Contour Update.” The contour update included modeling the original commercial aircraft studied in the NEPA EA as well as alternative commercial aircraft. The “original commercial aircraft” refers to the Q400 regional turbo prop aircraft and MD83 commercial aircraft assumed in the EA, while “Current Generation” refers to the EMB175 regional aircraft and 737800 commercial aircraft that reflect common aircraft used today and assumed to be in service within the planning horizon of the NEPA EA. The Maximum Throughput was also evaluated in that memo for both the assumptions presented in the EA and with an assumed higher level of activity. February 2, 2017 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS 1. Why are counts of operations in the base case (2008) higher than future year 2013 or future year 2018 operations? This is not intuitive. Existing operations numbers should be explained when the report is updated with the base case of 2016 or 2017.
    [Show full text]