DOCSLIB.ORG

Emergency Response: Mine Entry Data Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Emergency Response: Mine Entry Data Management ACARP PROJECT C19010 PUBLISHED 06/07/2015 EMERGENCY RESPONSE: MINE ENTRY DATA MANAGEMENT Darren Brady, Geoff Nugent, David Cliff, Steve Tonegato, Peter Mason & Seamus Devlin QUEENSLAND MINES RESCUE SERVICE DISCLAIMER No person, corporation or other organisation (“person”) should rely on the contents of this report and each should obtain independent advice from a qualified person with respect to the information contained in this report. Australian Coal Research Limited, its directors, servants and agents (collectively “ACR”) is not responsible for the consequences of any action taken by any person in reliance upon the information set out in this report, for the accuracy or veracity of any information contained in this report or for any error or omission in this report. ACR expressly disclaims any and all liability and responsibility to any person in respect of anything done or omitted to be done in respect of the information set out in this report, any inaccuracy in this report or the consequences of any action by any person in reliance, whether wholly or partly, upon the whole or any part of the contents of this report. ACARP Project Number C19010 Emergency Response: Mine Entry Data Management - Extension Final Report Darren Brady Geoff Nugent David Cliff Steve Tonegato Peter Mason Seamus Devlin DATE OF ISSUE: 6th July 2015 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................... 4 1. Abstract .................................................................................................... 5 2. Executive Summary .................................................................................. 5 4. Methodology ........................................................................................... 15 5. Industry Risk Assessment ....................................................................... 16 6. Results and Discussion ............................................................................ 22 6.1 Current legislative and standards requirements relevant to the research .............. 22 6.2 Recommendations from disaster investigations ..................................................... 36 6.3 Case Studies .......................................................................................................... 43 6.4 Conditions likely to be Experienced During and After an Event ............................ 52 6.5 Current status of existing systems ......................................................................... 54 6.6 Status in Other Countries ..................................................................................... 65 6.7 Other Industries .................................................................................................... 67 6.8 Discussions with Manufacturers and Suppliers ..................................................... 68 6.9 Options for Increasing Survivability ..................................................................... 69 6.9.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 69 6.9.2 Cable/Tube ............................................................................................................................. 69 6.9.2.1 Trenching (Floor) ................................................................................................................ 70 6.9.2.2 Recessing (Roof and Rib)..................................................................................................... 71 6.9.2.3 Cable Positioning/Location .................................................................................................. 71 6.9.2.4 Armoured Cable/Tube ........................................................................................................ 72 6.9.2.5 Cable/Tube Shielding .......................................................................................................... 74 6.9.2.6 Fire Resistant Cable/Tube ................................................................................................... 75 6.9.2.7 Fixing/Installation Cable and Tube ...................................................................................... 76 6.9.2.8 Redundant Cable ................................................................................................................ 79 6.9.2.9 Fibre Optic Cable ............................................................................................................... 80 6.9.3 Shielding ................................................................................................................................. 80 6.9.4 Location .................................................................................................................................. 82 6.9.5 Fixing ..................................................................................................................................... 82 6.9.6 Recessing ................................................................................................................................ 82 6.9.7 Redundancy ............................................................................................................................ 83 6.9.8 Contingent Systems ................................................................................................................. 84 6.9.9 Summary ................................................................................................................................ 84 7. Conclusions ............................................................................................. 85 8. Recommendations ................................................................................... 87 Page 2 of 154 9. Bibliography ........................................................................................... 89 Appendix A: Case Studies ............................................................................. 93 A1 Pike River Mine, New Zealand 19th November 2010 ...................................................................... 94 A2 Upper Big Branch, USA 5th April 2010 ......................................................................................... 96 A3 Sago, USA 2nd January 2006 ...................................................................................................... 104 A4 Willow Creek, USA, 31st July 2000 ............................................................................................. 109 A5 Endeavour Colliery, NSW 28th June 1995 ................................................................................... 111 A6 Moura No.2 Mine, Qld 7th August 1994 ...................................................................................... 113 A7 Moura No.4 Mine, Qld 16th July 1986 ......................................................................................... 126 A8 Appin Colliery, NSW 24th July 1979 ........................................................................................... 131 A9 West Wallsend Colliery, NSW, 8th January 1979 ......................................................................... 137 A10 Roof Fall in Drift Mine A ....................................................................................................... 138 A11 Roof Fall in Drift Mine B ....................................................................................................... 140 A12 Crandall Canyon, USA, August 6th 2007 ................................................................................. 141 A13 Alma Mine No. 1, Aracoma Coal Co., USA, 19th January 2006 ................................................ 142 A14 #3 Mine Fairfax Mining Co., Inc., USA, September 16th 2002 .................................................. 143 A15 No. 5 Mine, Jim Walter Resources, Inc., USA, 23rd September 2001 ........................................ 144 A16 Darby Mine No. 1, Kentucky Darby LLC, USA, May 20th 2007 ............................................... 145 A17 Truck Fire in Gold Mine ....................................................................................................... 148 Appendix B: Conditions likely to be experienced during and after an event . 149 B1 Explosions ................................................................................................................................. 150 B2 Fires .......................................................................................................................................... 151 B3 Roof Falls, Outbursts and Pillar Failures ................................................................................... 152 B4 Inundation ................................................................................................................................ 153 Appendix C: Copy of mine survey ............................................................... 154 Page 3 of 154 ACARP C19010 Extension Acknowledgments The assistance of, and contributions from the following are greatly appreciated: The respondents from the underground survey Queensland Mines Rescue Service Mines Rescue Pty Ltd AmpControl Austdac Northern Lights Technology Mine Site Technology Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (NZ) NSW Trade & Investment Department of Natural Resources and Mines (QLD) Simtars MISHC BMA Broadmeadow Mine Mine Safety Institute of Australia Page
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FNZ Basket 14102010
    14-Oct-10 smartFONZ Basket Composition Composition of a basket of securities and cash equivalent to 200,000 NZX 50 Portfolio Index Fund units effective from 14 October 2010 The new basket composition applies to applications and withdrawals. Cash Portion: $ 1,902.98 Code Security description Shares ABA Abano Healthcare Group Limited 88 AIA Auckland International Airport Limited Ordinary Shares 6,725 AIR Air New Zealand Limited (NS) Ordinary Shares 2,784 AMP AMP Limited Ordinary Shares 432 ANZ Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited Ord Shares 212 APN APN News & Media Limited Ordinary Shares 1,759 APT AMP NZ Office Trust Ordinary Units 8,453 ARG Argosy Property Trust Ordinary Units 4,344 CAV Cavalier Corporation Limited Ordinary Shares 482 CEN Contact Energy Limited Ordinary Shares 1,508 EBO Ebos Group Limited Ordinary Shares 537 FBU Fletcher Building Limited Ordinary Shares 1,671 FPA Fisher & Paykel Appliances Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares 6,128 FPH Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corporation Limited Ord Shares 3,106 FRE Freightways Limited Ordinary Shares 1,625 GFF Goodman Fielder Limited Ordinary Shares 3,990 GMT Macquarie Goodman Property Trust Ordinary Units 8,004 GPG Guinness Peat Group Plc Ordinary Shares 15,588 HLG Hallenstein Glasson Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares 430 IFT Infratil Limited Ordinary Shares 6,363 KIP Kiwi Income Property Trust Ordinary Units 10,287 KMD Kathmandu Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares 690 MFT Mainfreight Limited Ordinary Shares 853 MHI Michael Hill International Limited Ordinary Shares 1,433 NPX
    [Show full text]
  • View Their Documen- Increases on Several Occasions
    In this Issue December 2013 The Pennies and the Pounds 1 The best and the worst of the NZX50 since The Pennies and the 2009 3 NZ Windfarms AGM 25 The 2013 Beacon Award 4 Skellerup Holdings AGM 25 Pounds Takeovers Panel provides easy to read guides 5 Kathmandu AGM 26 New Regulations for providers of custodial Pumpkin Patch AGM 26 espite changing to decimal currency in 1967, here is services 5 Barramundi Fund AGM 27 an old saying that still rings true. “If you watch the Company Meetings Marlin Global Fund AGM 27 pennies, the pounds will take care of themselves”. In Telecom AGM 6 Precinct Property AGM 28 D other words, do the small things well and the big outcomes Fletcher Building AGM 7 Contact Energy AGM 29 will eventually follow. Hellaby Holdings AGM 8 Chorus AGM 30 Mighty River Power AGM 9 Vital Healthcare Property Trust AGM 30 When it comes to their shareholders, it seems that some Michael Hill International AGM 10 AWF SGM 31 companies are forgetting this maxim. Over the past year we Ebos AGM 11 Bathurst AGM 31 have seen increasing evidence of inadequate or potentially Sky City Entertainment AGM 12 NZ Oil and Gas AGM 32 misleading information being provided in resolutions and TeamTalk AGM 13 Auckland International Airport AGM 33 notices of annual or special meetings. In most cases this is Heartland Bank AGM 14 Caught on the Net 34 unlikely to be a deliberate attempt to confuse shareholders. Cavalier Corporation AGM 15 Branch Reports But it does raise questions about, if the company can’t get Freightways AGM 16 Auckland 35 the small things right, what are they doing with the big stuff.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Points Value of Kupe to NZOG
    for the quarter ended 30 June 2010 Dear investor It was a busy three month period for NZOG, Production from the Tui area oil fields slightly In May, shareholders of Pike River Coal (PRC) against a backdrop of falling international exceeded the revised target for the financial year agreed to a funding package that included a new sharemarkets and dismay over the BP oil spill in ended 30 June, producing a total of 4.83 million equity issue and around $40m of debt from the Gulf of Mexico. That disaster demonstrated barrels – NZOG’s share 604,000 barrels. NZOG NZOG through convertible bonds. More details the need for health, safety and environmental received NZ$13.1m in revenue from Tui in the about Pike can be found on the back page of performance to always be the number one June quarter. this report. priority in the petroleum industry. In late June, it was identified that repairs were The Kupe gas and oil field was in full production required to the artificial lift system for one of the through the quarter, earning NZOG NZ$18.2m in Tui field’s four producing wells, Pateke 3-H. revenue. A reserves review was completed, The Operator is planning a work-over of the David Salisbury CEO which saw the 2P (proved and probable) well later in 2010. In the meantime the well has 21 July 2010 reserves increased substantially. At current been shut-in, which means some production prices, NZOG’s share of the additional will be deferred. recoverable light oil, LPG and gas has a value of As you know, NZOG is always on the lookout around NZ$100m.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Institutions and Practices June 2014
    Regulatory institutions and practices June 2014 The Productivity Commission aims to provide insightful, well-informed and accessible advice that leads to the best possible improvement in the wellbeing of New Zealanders. Regulatory institutions and practices June 2014 ii Regulatory institutions and practices The New Zealand Productivity Commission Date: 30 June 2014 The Commission – an independent Crown entity – completes in-depth inquiry reports on topics that the Government selects, carries out productivity-related research and promotes understanding of productivity issues. The Commission’s work is guided by the New Zealand Productivity Commission Act 2010. You can find information on the Commission at www.productivity.govt.nz, or by calling +64 4 903 5150. Disclaimer The contents of this report must not be construed as legal advice. The Commission does not accept any responsibility or liability for an action taken as a result of reading, or reliance placed because of having read any part, or all, of the information in this report. The Commission does not accept any responsibility or liability for any error, inadequacy, deficiency, flaw in or omission from this report. ISBN: 978-0-478-44002-7 (print) ISBN: 978-0-478-44003-4 (online) Inquiry contacts Administration Robyn Sadlier Website www.productivity.govt.nz T: (04) 903 5167 E: [email protected] Twitter @nzprocom LinkedIn NZ Productivity Commission Other matters Steven Bailey Inquiry Director T: (04) 903 5156 E: [email protected] Foreword iii Foreword Regulation is a pervasive feature of modern life. Its coverage stretches from the workplace to the sports field, the home to the shopping mall, and from the city to the great outdoors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Non-Technical Issues on Decision-Making by Coal Mining Incident Management Teams
    The impact of non-technical issues on decision-making by coal mining incident management teams. Ruth Grace Fuller BEng Hons Civil Engineering Grad Dip Psychology BSc Hons Psychology Grad Dip Secondary Education A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2014 Sustainable Minerals Institute Abstract A serious incident in an underground coal mine can claim many lives in an instant. The lives of those who survive the initial moments can be dependent on the decisions made by the incident management team (IMT). The IMT is a team of mine employees assembled immediately upon the discovery of an incident to manage the response. Evaluations of annual emergency exercises conducted at underground coal-mines in Queensland have indicated that IMT decision-making is generally sub-optimal. This finding was echoed by the Royal Commission into the New Zealand Pike River Coal Mine Tragedy that occurred in 2010. In many other high-reliability roles technical and non-technical issues have been found to impact decision-making. The goal of this research is to explore the role of non-technical issues in emergency decision-making following an underground coal mining incident. A review of the Queensland emergency exercise reports, direct observation of emergency simulations, and interviews with twenty-five mining personnel with real-life incident management experience at underground coal mine emergencies has led to the development of a non-technical skills taxonomy for decision-making in mining IMTs. The decision-making process in a mining IMT has been shown to be a broad socio-psycho-technical process within which technical and non-technical issues cannot be separated.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges Encountered by New Zealand Mines Rescue at the Pike River Mine Disaster
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Engineering and Information Coal Operators' Conference Sciences 2012 Challenges encountered by New Zealand mines rescue at the Pike River mine disaster Trevor Watts New Zealand Mines Rescue Service Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/coal Recommended Citation Trevor Watts, Challenges encountered by New Zealand mines rescue at the Pike River mine disaster, in Naj Aziz and Bob Kininmonth (eds.), Proceedings of the 2012 Coal Operators' Conference, Mining Engineering, University of Wollongong, 18-20 February 2019 https://ro.uow.edu.au/coal/425 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] 2012 Coal Operators’ Conference The University of Wollongong CHALLENGES ENCOUNTERED BY NEW ZEALAND MINES RESCUE AT THE PIKE RIVER MINE DISASTER Trevor Watts1 ABATRACT: The loss of 29 lives in the Pike River Mine Disaster of 19th November 2010 will be forever remembered as one of the darkest days in the history of coalmining in New Zealand. The effects of this tragic event have also been felt by the mining industry in Australia. As an industry we are constantly aware of terms such as “Emergency Preparedness” and “Emergency Response Management Plans” and in fact, numerous seminars and forums are facilitated to study these topics in detail. This begs the question, “how well is your organisation really prepared if it was faced with a major disaster such as that which occurred at Pike River”? The incident management team, mine manager, mines rescue and other emergency organisations responding to the Pike River mine explosion faced significant challenges on planning a re-entry into the mine by rescue teams.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, March 30, 2021
    TE NUPEPA O TE TAIRAWHITI TUESDAY, MARCH 30, 2021 HOME-DELIVERED $1.90, RETAIL $2.20 OKITU DEVELOPERS FINED CORN CHANGES: The Cedenco proposal to shut FOR CONSENT BREACHES down its IQF (Individually PAGE 5 Quick Frozen) plant (below) in the industrial subdivision will directly affect the jobs of 13 permanent staff. It will also affect the amount of corn grown in the district and trucked (main picture) to the factory each season. Pictures supplied PIKE RIVER FAMILIES HEARTBROKEN PAGE 6 PAGE 16 TAKING THE KNEE AT FLOYD MURDER TRIAL Proposal to close IQF CEDENCO factory will affect jobs CEDENCO Foods New by Watties. employees can be easily Zealand proposes to close one “We put the proposed changes absorbed in other departments of its four Gisborne processing to staff last week in a plan and field operations. lines in early April when the that includes reutilising our “All staff will be offered current harvest ends, and it IQF facilities for powder and redeployment either to other RESET will directly affect the jobs of 13 frozen squash facilities, which departments in Gisborne or to people. are already at full capacity,” Mr the Cedenco Hastings factory The company proposes to shut Nelson said. which the company is currently down its Individually Quick “The proposed closure of the expanding with construction of a Frozen or IQF facility which has IQF factory will allow Cedenco new apple processing plant due operated on the site since 2001. and its growers to focus on for completion in April.” “If the closure proceeds it will growing sweetcorn for its Mr Nelson said it was hoped reduce employment on the site powder operation.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2013, Vol. 4 No. 7 National Labour News National, Economic
    American Income Life Insurance Company 1701 K Street, N.W., Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 833-2030 JAMES WILLIAMS, General President - International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, Chairman - AIL Labour Advisoury Board VICTOR KAMBER, Vice President - American Income Life Insurance Company, Executive Director - AIL Labour Advisoury Board ROGER SMITH, Chief Executive Officer - American Income Life Insurance Company, President - AIL Labour Advisoury Board DENISE BOWYER, Vice President - American Income Life Insurance Company, Secretary - AIL Labour Advisoury Board DEBBIE ENSTEDT, Vice President International Public Relations - American Income Life Insurance Company STEVE FRIEDLANDER, State General Agent - American Income Life Insurance Company July 2013, Vol. 4 No. 7 National Labour News The Government rejected calls by the Council of Trade Unions, forestry workers' unions and the Labour Party for an inquiry into the deaths of four workers earlier this year. Labour Minister Simon Bridges said the new stand-along workplace health and safety agency that will be created will take a hard look at the forestry industry. The new agency, WorkSafe New Zealand, will be established under legislation that's going through parliament. Bridges said the agency will be operational by December. CTU President Helen Kelly recently charged that Bridges gave "a misleading report" to parliament that the current code of practice in forestry "is working." "This statement from the Minster certainly does not reflect the very concerning discussion we had with the forest workers at the worksite. The workers told us that they believed many workers in the region were working in very dangerous conditions," she said. After 10 months of consultation, the Independent Taskforce on Workplace Health and Safety recently reported that current workplace safety and health systems were not fit, citing "a number of significant weaknesses" that needed addressing.
    [Show full text]
  • ´Group Work Speeches
    ´Group Work Speeches Shashi Tharoor’s address to the Oxford Union, Oxford, 2015 Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7CW7S0zxv4 (0:00-6:48) ​ ​ (remember to stop the video at 6:48!) Transcript: ​ http://www.news18.com/news/india/read-shashi-tharoors-full-speech-asking-uk-to-pay-india-for-20 0-years-of-its-colonial-rule-1024821.html Your task: Watch the speech together (go somewhere where you will not disturb anyone! – write on the ​ blackboard where you will be sitting, so I can find you at any given time). In the speech, you must look at the following aspects: ✓ Background: o Who is the speaker? (occupation etc.) o What is the occasion/reason for the speech? ✓ What method(s) of delivery did the speaker use? -and why do you think this is the case? ✓ How is the speaker’s … o voice? (pronunciation, articulation, rhythm, volume, rate, accent/dialect) o choice of words? (accurate, clear, redundant) o body language? (gestures, movement, eye contact) ✓ Which pillars of persuasion did the speaker use to emphasize his/her point? Provide examples All of the above must be presented to the rest of the class with the use of PowerPoint. Remember to use the tools about oral communication in your own presentation as well. Presentations will be followed by feedback / Q&A. While listening to presentations, each group must note at least one thing for feedback OR come up with a question to ask the group once the presentation is done. Transcript: ​ Madam President and gentlemen, ladies of the house I standing here with eight minutes in my hands in this venerable and rather magnificent institution, I was going to assure you that I belong to the Henry VIII School of public speaking - that as Henry VIII said to his wives 'I shall not keep you long'.
    [Show full text]
  • The Institute of Quarrying New Zealand Inc
    The Institute of Quarrying New Zealand Inc IoQ QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER Issue No. 26 March 2011 President’s Notes: Executive Committee Welcome Members 2010/11: Hi everybody and welcome to the New Year. President: I hope you all had a safe and happy New Mr Warwick Leach Years. I can’t believe its April already! It still Vice President: seems to be summer in the North Island with Mr Gavin Hartley our farming community a lot happier this year with the odd drop of rain, Immediate Past President: relieving the bad drought that they have had to endure for the last three Mr George Kelcher years. The Dairy companies are looking at some good pay outs for the milk Mr Murray Discombe fat this season which must a have a ‘trickle down’ affect on quarries with maintenance metal and lime rock going out the quarry gate for farm tracks Mr Chris Gray and cow races before the wet seasons arrives. Mr Gordon Laing Mr Andrew Mahon At this stage, I would just like to make comment on the Christchurch Mr Peter Morgan earthquake and pass on our deepest condolences to our Christchurch people, we always think this sort of thing just doesn’t happen in NZ. To be Mr Les Ward hit with two major earthquakes within months is unbelievable and watching National Secretary/Treasurer: the scale of the damage unfold, it was like a war zone and it made every Mrs Christine Dodds New Zealander wonder how can we help. I was talking to George Kelcher the other day and he was saying that Christchurch has 5 million tonnes of Invited Board Member: Mr Kevin Walker, waste that needs to be removed from the city and one problems they are CEO Exito facing is where can they put that amount of waste? The availability of roading work around our area sponsors with a commitment again from our hasn’t improved with work being tough and margins Platinum, Gold, Silver & Bronze sponsors.
    [Show full text]
  • S&P/ASX Index Consultation
    S&P/ASX Index Consultation: New Zealand and PNG Secondary Listings on ASX and Index Eligibility October 2010 JOINT S&P / ASX Disclaimer: The information contained in this consultation paper (the “Paper”) is for the purposes of conducting a market survey only. It does not constitute investment and/or financial product advice. You should consider obtaining independent advice before making any investment and/or financial decisions. Neither ASX, ASX’s directors, officers, agents, employees, or contractors (“ASX Personnel”), nor Standard & Poor’s, Standard & Poor’s directors, officers, agents, employees or contractors (“S&P Personnel”) give any representation or warranty as to the reliability, accuracy or currency of the information contained in the Paper. To the extent permitted by law, neither ASX, ASX Personnel, Standard & Poor’s, S&P Personnel, shall be liable for, or responsible for, any losses, damages, costs, expenses or claims arising in any way (including by way of negligence) from anyone taking an action (or failing to act) based on, or in reliance on, the Paper or any information or material arising from or incidental to the Paper, whether in writing or otherwise. Any reference to “ASX” means “ASX Limited”, “ASX Operations Pty Limited” and all other related bodies corporate. Any reference to “S&P” or “Standard & Poor’s” means “Standard & Poor’s, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.” and all of its affiliates. All currency values are in Australian dollars unless otherwise stated. © copyright 2010 Standard & Poor’s, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc, ASX Operations Pty Limited ABN 42 004 523 782 (ASXO).
    [Show full text]
  • A Systems Failure: How the Cherries Lined up the Pike River Mine Disaster
    A systems failure: how the cherries lined up THE PIKE RIVER MINE DISASTER HFESA Ron Cummings Memorial Lecture 2018 Jim Knowles November 2018 1 Background Friday, 19 November 2010 At 3:45pm, the Pike River Underground Coal Mine, near Greymouth on the west coast of the South Island, New Zealand, exploded 29 men underground died immediately or later, from the blast or from the toxic atmosphere Over the next nine days the mine exploded three more times before it was sealed. November 2018 2 The survivors Two men in the stone drift, some distance from the mine workings escaped with minor injuries. Daniel Rockhouse and Russell Smith November 2018 3 Background November 2018 Pike River Mine is still an unexplored crime scene. There has been no forensic examination of the drift or mine. No-one has been able to explain categorically what happened that day. November 2018 4 Greymouth November 2018 5 The Terrain November 2018 6 The Mine The portal (entrance) Ventilation shaft Mine workings The stone drift – 2.4km Pit bottom in stone November 2018 7 Fire at the ventilation shaft November 2018 8 Smoke from the ventilation shaft November 2018 9 The poker machine analogy “the cherries” November 2018 10 How the cherries lined up Fire Suppression Unit Accident Cherries Legislation changes Loss of specialist knowledge and skills Costs and production pressures Poor mine design and maintenance Management structure and culture Operational issues Human resources November 2018 11 The path to tragedy Changes in legislation Mines came under Health Safety and
    [Show full text]