DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation Support Study on Geographical Indications and Traditional Specialities Guaranteed Protected in the EU

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation Support Study on Geographical Indications and Traditional Specialities Guaranteed Protected in the EU Evaluation support study on Geographical Indications and Traditional Specialities Guaranteed protected in the EU Final report Written by AND International, ECORYS and COGEA December 2020 Project manager: Tanguy CHEVER Management team: Francesca ANTILICI, Tanguy CHEVER, Carina FOLKESON LILLO, Christian RENAULT and Violaine ROMIEU. Project team: AND International: Tanguy CHEVER, Félix KANE, Clément LEPEULE, Sibylle PARANT, Christian RENAULT, Séverine RENAULT and Violaine ROMIEU; ECORYS: Olivier CHARTIER, Valentina DI GIROLAMO, Carina FOLKESON LILLO and Giulia MARTINO; COGEA: Ugo ABBAGNANO, Francesca ANTILICI, Silvia CODERONI, Maria QUEIROZ and Ezio SCOTTI. With the support of geographical experts: Marek DVOŘÁK, Tamás MIZIK, Roel PEETERS, Simone STERLY and Paola TORCIA. The information and views set out in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development Direction C - Strategy, simplification and policy analysis Unit C.4 - Monitoring and Evaluation Contact dissemination: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION Evaluation support study on Geographical Indications and Traditional Specialities Guaranteed protected in the EU Final report Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development 2021 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2021 PDF ISBN 978-92-76-23867-6 doi: 10.2762/891024 KF-01-20-621-EN-N © European Union, 2021 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged The United Kingdom withdrew from the European Union as of 1 February 2020. During the transition period, which ends on 31 December 2020, Union law, with a few limited exceptions, continues to be applicable to and in the United Kingdom and any reference to Member States in Union law shall be understood as including the United Kingdom. Evaluation support study on Geographical Indications and Traditional Specialities Guaranteed protected in the EU ABSTRACT This study provides an evaluation on the EU quality policy on geographical indications (GIs) and traditional specialities guaranteed (TSGs) protected in the EU. This covers 3 286 names (3 224 GIs and 62 TSGs) originating from EU Member States and registered in the EU and 32 GIs registered through direct application by third countries. The objectives of GIs and TSGs are overall achieved. We observe a wide range of possible benefits of the schemes for stakeholders, even if they are not systematic. The main limits are the low awareness and understanding of the schemes by consumers in some Member States and some weaknesses of the controls at the downstream st ages of the value chain. The GIs/TSGs are assessed to be efficient. GIs and TSGs may provide several benefits and the costs for public bodies (at EU and national levels) are estimated at 0.12% of the total sales value under GI/TSG. The schemes are assessed to be relevant for both private stakeholders and public authorities. The considerations of GIs/TSGs for environmental sustainability and animal welfare are growing, they could be further developed. Considering coherence, no major incompatibility has been identified, regarding the GIs and EU trade marks, GIs/TSGs and national/regional schemes, GIs/TSGs and other EU policies. There is a clear EU added value for GIs and TSGs. RESUME Cette étude est une évaluation de la politique qualité de l’UE sur les indications géographiques (IG) et les spécialités traditionnelles garanties (STG) protégées au sein de l’UE. Cela couvre 3 286 noms (3 223 IG et 62 STG) enregistrés par des Etats Membres de l’UE et 32 IG enregistrées directement par des pays tiers. D’une manière générale, les objectifs des IG et STG sont remplis. On observe une grande diversité de bénéfices possibles des dispositifs pour les parties prenantes, ils ne sont cependant pas systématiques. Les principales limites sont la faible notoriété et compréhension des dispositifs par les consommateurs dans certains Etats Membres et des points faibles dans les contrôles à l’aval des filières. Les IG/STG sont considérées comme étant efficientes. Les IG et STG peuvent procurer différents bénéfices et les coûts pour les pouvoirs publics (au niveau de l’UE et au niveau national) sont estimés à 0.12% de la valeur totale des ventes sous IG/STG. Les dispositifs sont considérés comme étant pertinents pour les acteurs privés et les pouvoirs publics. Les considérations des IG et STG pour la durabilité environnementale et le bien-être animal augmentent, elles pourraient être plus fortement développées. En termes de cohérence, aucune incompatibilité majeure n’a été identifiée concernant les IG et les marques de l’UE, les IG/STG et les dispositifs nationaux/régionaux, les IG/STG et les autres politiques de l’UE. La valeur ajoutée de l’UE sur les IG et STG est importante. Evaluation support study on Geographical Indications and Traditional Specialities Guaranteed protected in the EU TABLE OF CONTENT 1. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 1 2. OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY .................................................................... 2 2.1 Objectives of the study............................................................................................2 2.2 Scope of the study ..................................................................................................2 3. MAIN CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................. 4 3.1 Effectiveness ..........................................................................................................4 3.2 Impacts on third country GIs ...................................................................................7 3.3 Efficiency ...............................................................................................................7 3.4 Relevance ..............................................................................................................7 3.5 Coherence .............................................................................................................9 3.6 EU added value .................................................................................................... 10 4. RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................ 11 5. METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY ................................................................................ 25 5.1 Presentation of the tools implemented .................................................................... 25 5.2 Use of the different tools in the analysis .................................................................. 26 5.3 Desk research ...................................................................................................... 27 5.4 National authorities (NAs) survey (electronic) .......................................................... 28 5.5 Case studies (CS) (17 CS in seven MS) ................................................................... 28 5.6 Producer groups (PG) survey ................................................................................. 29 5.7 Third country GIs surveys...................................................................................... 30 5.8 Consumer survey.................................................................................................. 30 5.9 FADN analysis ...................................................................................................... 30 6. DESCRIPTIVE CHAPTER............................................................................................ 31 6.1 What are GIs and TSGs?........................................................................................ 31 6.2 Economic overview of GIs/TSGs at EU level ............................................................. 32 6.3 EU regulatory framework for GIs and TSGs.............................................................. 34 6.3.1 Historical perspective ........................................................................................ 34 6.3.2 Regulatory framework in each sector .................................................................. 36 6.3.3 Intervention logic.............................................................................................. 38 6.3.4 Implementation at EU and MS levels ................................................................... 44 6.3.5 Indications, acronyms and symbols..................................................................... 48 6.4 Enforcement (and controls) of GIs/TSGs
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Capture the True Essence of the State in a Glass of Wine
    For more information please visit www.WineOrigins.com and follow us on: www.facebook.com/ProtectWineOrigins @WineOrigins TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1. INTRODUCTION 2. WHO WE ARE Location is the key ingredient in wine. In fact, each bottle showcases 3. WHY LOCATION MATTERS authentic characteristics of the land, air, water and weather from which it 4. THE DECLARATION originated, and the distinctiveness of local grape growers and winemakers. 5. SIGNATORY REGIONS • Bordeaux Unfortunately, there are some countries that do not adequately protect • Bourgogne/Chablis a wine’s true place of origin on wine labels allowing for consumers to be • Champagne misled. When a wine’s true place of origin is misused, the credibility of the • Chianti Classico industry as a whole is diminished and consumers can be confused. As • Jerez-Xérès-Sherry such, some of the world’s leading wine regions came together to sign the • Long Island Joint Declaration to Protect Wine Place & Origin. By becoming signatories, • Napa Valley members have committed to working together to raise consumer awareness • Oregon and advocate to ensure wine place names are protected worldwide. • Paso Robles • Porto You can help us protect a wine’s true place of origin by knowing where your • Rioja wine is grown and produced. If you are unsure, we encourage you to ask • Santa Barbara County and demand that a wine’s true origin be clearly identified on its label. • Sonoma County Truth-in-labeling is important so you can make informed decisions when • Tokaj selling, buying or enjoying wines. • Victoria • Walla Walla Valley • Washington State We thank you for helping us protect the sanctity of wine growing regions • Western Australia worldwide and invite you to learn more at www.wineorigins.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Tokaj Wine Region As a World Heritage Site Complex Development Opportunities
    DOI: 10.2478/midj-2018-0004 MID Journal Volume 1 ǀ Issue 1 ǀ 2018 ǀ pp. 53-62 Tokaj Wine Region as a World Heritage Site Complex Development Opportunities Zoltán SZAKÁL 1* 1 University of Miskolc, Tourism Institute and Department, Hungary ___________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT The Tokaj wine region is a unique, over a thousand-year-old wine-growing tradition in the world, which is a survival of a living cultural landscape. The Tokaj Wine Region Development Council was established in 2014 to lead the wine region’s Tokaj-Hegyalja National Program. The development concept in this priority program is aimed at promoting complex developments in the ecological balance of the Tokaj Wine Region, which are both natural, social, economic and cultural. The purpose of the paper is to present the region marketing idea in a world heritage wine region. This can be supported by primary and secondary research. The organization of the examined wine region development council and the key actors were asked. There was an inquiry at the wineries, 41 companies answered the questions. There are excellent specialists and the natural endowments are also suitable. The newly established Hungarian Tourism Office is the only hope that Community wine marketing can be really effective, and wineries can also experience its positive effect. There are 27 settlements in the wine region, there is a national park, and the tourism sector is only one that can be complementary to wine-making opportunities. Directions of development: winery, viticulture, infrared structure, tourism extension, culture, traditions, value preservation, hotel, attraction development, uniform appearance and coordination.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Tokaji Overview
    ROYAL TOKAJI OVERVIEW TOKAJI’S ROYAL CONNECTION AND RENAISSANCE The first Tokaji aszú wine was created in the 1600s perhaps by accident — a harvest delayed by threat of enemy invasion. In 1700, Tokaj became the first European region to have its vineyards classified — its uniquely varied terroirs and climates rated “primae classis, secundae classis, tertius classis,” or “first growth, second growth, third growth,” by Prince Rakoczi II of Transylvania. This classification system is still used in Hungary today. Quality production ended with the Communist Party takeover of Hungarian winemaking. Aszú grapes were used for mass production in factories, with vineyard distinctions lost in giant tanks. Tokaj’s renaissance began after the collapse of communism with the establishment of Royal Tokaji in 1990 by well- known author Hugh Johnson and a small group of investors, who were inspired to restore and preserve Hungary’s precious wine legacy. THE TOKAJ REGION Situated along the southern slopes of the Zemplén Mountains, Tokaj is characterized by late springs and short growing seasons. The average temperatures are generally cool, with long, sunny summers and dry autumns. Tokaj’s soil is largely clay or loess with a volcanic substratum. The meeting of the Tisza and Bodrog rivers in Tokaj creates a mist similar to that of the fog in Sauternes. The mist encourages “botrytis cinerea,” or “noble rot,” which dries and shrivels the grapes that comprise Tokaji wines, and concentrates the sugars. Grapes that are infected with botrytis are commonly referred to by the Hungarian term aszú. GRAPE VARIETIES By law, only white grape varieties are allowed to be planted in Tokaj.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncorked – the Future of Tokaj?
    Uncorked – The future of Tokaj? Koppány Nádassy May 2020 Abstract Motivation Tokaj Wine Region was once the place of production of the noblest wines of the world, but became a marginal wine region by the 20th century. There are many factors, which made this region faded away, but its uniqueness, the steadfast work of winemakers and market trends enable a brighter future for this wine region that has once enjoyed great acclaim. The fall of the Iron Curtain and the changes in consumer habits motivated the winemakers and the region to repositioning the variety Furmint on the local market and also on the export markets as well. Objectives The objective of this thesis is to demonstrate the alteration of the Tokaj Wine Region. This thesis aims to show this evolution in the context of the historical background, the overview of the viticulture and vinification and the market overview. At the end propose a possible product range, and cooperation which could make sense to wine-growers and producers to strenghten their market position. Methodology To accomplish this task I did research about the History of Tokaj Wine Region in the literatures available from the 19th century and also did a research over the internet. The majority of the texts were available in Hungarian language, but English texts were also accessible. Since I currently work for one of the most prestigious wineries in Tokaj Wine Region, this thesis will be based mostly on my personal research and discussions with vineyard workers, winemakers and CEOs from the region. I will use my experiences from the Export Markets to localize the possibilities of the Furmint variety and the Wines from Tokaj in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Rozlievané Vína / Glass of Wine
    Vínna karta / Wine list Rozlievané vína / Glass of wine Biele / White 0,1 l Muller Thurgau, 2018, D.S.C. 2,20 € akostné víno, suché, Pivnica Orechová, Sobranský vinohradnícky rajón quality wine, dry, Wine Cellar Orechová, Sobrance wine region Chardonnay FUSION, 2017 2,90 € akostné víno, suché, Víno Nichta, Nitrianska vinohradnícka oblasť quality wine, dry, Víno Nichta, Nitra wine region Muškát žltý, 2017 2,50 € akostné víno, polosuché, Chateau Grand Bari, vinohradnícka oblasť Tokaj quality wine, semi-sweet, Chateau Grand Bari, Tokaj wine region Chardonnay, 2017 2,90 € suché, Les Ormes de Cambras, Languedoc-Roussillon, Francúzsko dry, Les Ormes de Cambras, Languedoc-Roussillon, France Červené / Red 0,1 l Frankovka modrá, 2016, D.S.C. 2,60 € akostné víno, suché, Pivnica Orechová, Sobranský vinohradnícky rajón quality wine, dry, Wine Cellar Orechová, Sobrance wine region Merlot, 2016 2,70 € akostné víno, suché, Mavín, Južnoslovenská vinohradnícka oblasť quality wine, dry, Mavín, Southern Slovakian wine region Rudava, 2017 3,50 € D.S.C., suché, Velkeer, Nitrianska vinohradnícka oblasť dry, Velkeer, Nitra Slovakian wine region Cabernet Sauvignon, 2015 2,90 € suché, Les Ormes de Cambras, Languedoc-Roussillon, Francúzsko dry, Les Ormes de Cambras, Languedoc-Roussillon, France Ružové / Rosé 0,1 l Cabernet Sauvignon rosé, 2016 2,60 € akostné víno, suché, PD Mojmírovce, Nitrianska vinohradnícka oblasť quality wine, dry, Víno Muráni, Nitrianska vinohradnícka oblasť Biele víno / White wine 0,75 l Slovenská republika/ Slovak Republic Silváner Granit,
    [Show full text]
  • The November 2017 Selection
    THE NOVEMBER 2017 SELECTION £16.99 x 2 £12.99 x 2 Chateau du Hureau Saumur Blanc Sec Domaine Bott Geyl Alsace Les Points Argile 2015, Loire, France Cardinaux Metiss, Alsace, France Metiss is a rich, aromatic, well-balanced white Historically the Chenin was the King of the made up of 35 percent each Pinot Blanc and grape varieties planted on the banks of the Pinot Auxerrois, and 15 percent each Pinot Gris Loire, but little by little it has been usurped by and Pinot Noir. That last, a red grape of course, the Cabernet Franc and more recently the is used in the traditional "blanc de noirs" ("white white grape, Sauvignon Blanc. These days from blacks") method in which the colour- those golden grapes of Chenin Blanc are fast carrying grape skins are removed from the are becoming a rarity in the Saumur fermenting wine before any tinge of red Champigny appellation. Chateau du Hureau appears. Full bodied and textural, this wine is plan to not let them become forgotten. classic with meaty fish and poultry. Serving temp: chilled 12°c Suggested food match: Seafood or Chilled as an Aperitif Serving temp: chilled 12°c Suggested food match: Seafood and poultry (with some spice) £11.29 x 2 Pajzos Tokaji "T" Furmint 2016, Tokaji, Hungary Wines created in the Tokaj Wine Region have a unique character, a distinct minerality. They have a wonderfully taut acid structure and offer wines perfect for a light or a heavier meal or simply to enjoy during a pleasant lunch. The Pajzos estate Furmint is very clean and fresh, the scent of a dewy spring meadow with some mango inflections.
    [Show full text]
  • TOKAJ FINE WINES Since 2000, Samuel Tinon Has Cultivated His Vines Has Been Able to Create Wines of His Imagination
    TOKAJ FINE WINES Since 2000, Samuel Tinon has cultivated his vines has been able to create wines of his imagination. without herbicides, without pesticides, without Since the beginning of his activity in Hungary, Samuel insecticides. Mainly with human energy and devotion. has invested in the identity of the wines of Tokaj, in the His wines are organic. And those made from Aszús, the genetic fingerprint of Tokaj, the Great Tokaj botrytised grapes are with minimum added sulphur. Sweet Wine*. Samuel Tinon has a qualitative, authentic and With his sweet and dry Szamorodni, the latter an committed approach to winemaking. He is constantly exceptional fruit of his know-how, Samuel is respected on the lookout for ways to explore and express the as one of the best producers of Tokaj. typicity, the excellence and the diversity of Tokaj's More recently, in 2012, Samuel started producing dry volcanic terroirs. He has been nominated best white wines, blends and single vineyard Furmints producer of the year(Paris, Le Louvre,Grand Tasting made from non-botrytised grapes. This range is 2006). composed of dry white wines with beautiful acidity, Samuel was born in the cradle of the Bordeaux aromatic palettes and exceptional structures. These botrytised wines, a preparation for what would later wines add to the modern image of Tokaj. become a life mission. Carrying the potential of this Welcome to Hungary! enchanting yet capricious fungusBotrytis cinerea,he * Described as ”Wine of Kings, King of Wines" by Louis XIV TOKAJ TERROIR Beautiful natural assets origin in the world. During the 18th and the 19th In the northeastern part of Hungary, right in the centre centuries, the wine was served at the royal courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Approach to the Strategy of the Vine & Wine
    SCIENTIFIC APPROACH TO THE STRATEGY OF THE VINE & WINE SECTOR WITH SPECIAL REGARD TO THE MÁTRAALJA WINE REGION Dr. MAGDA, SÁNDOR - Dr. GERGELY, SÁNDOR SUMMARY The essential objects of the present study are the description of the strategic aspects of the vine & wine sector and the detailed analysis of the Mátraalja wine region (MWR), which is Hungary s largest mountain-slope wine growing area. A questionnaire assessment served as a basis for the study, within the framework of which the managers of MWR wine confraternities were asked questions about the parameters of their respective wine confraternities, and their opinions of the present situation of the latter, along with the possibilities of de­ veloping them. Further issues examined were: the required development of infrastructure, including the inadequate wine-processing, storage and bottling capacities, their qualitative and quantitative characteristics, and the possibilities of establishing them; the establishment of an advisory system to serve vine growers’ interests; the possibilities of establishing a regional plant protection and weather forecast system, and its prospective effects on profitability and environmental protection. Finally, the structure of grape varieties, the aspects of creating a potential leading wine and of its marketing, the establishment of competitive wineries, the implementation of a system of trade and logistics based on Internet, and the effective realisation of marketing coordinated by the MWR Wine Commercial House were examined. The present study does not contain all tables and charts compiled by the authors but draws conclusions from them. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS settlements of Heves county, the settlements Vác, Mogyoród, Rákosliget- The authors want to thank the Királydomb and Rózsahegy-Báróhegy Council and the leaders of the 25 MWR situated in Pest county, and Pásztó wine confraternities for giving assistance situated in Nógrád county.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the CAP Measures Applicable to the Wine Sector
    Evaluation of the CAP measures applicable to the wine sector Case study report: Hungary Written by Agrosynergie EEIG Agrosynergie November – 2018 Groupement Européen d’Intérêt Economique AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development Directorate C – Strategy, simplification and policy analysis Unit C.4 – Monitoring and Evaluation E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION Evaluation of the CAP measures applicable to the wine sector Case study report: Hungary Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development 2018 EN Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019 Catalogue number: KF-06-18-300-EN-N ISBN: 978-92-79-97273-7 doi: 10.2762/79919 © European Union, 2018 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Images © Agrosynergie, 2018 EEIG AGROSYNERGIE is formed by the following companies: ORÉADE-BRÈCHE Sarl & COGEA S.r.l.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study on Energy Demand
    3sCE417P3 Introduction of Regional Energy Concepts COMPARATIVE STUDY Energy demand analysis of nine concept regions under the framework of CENTRAL EUROPE Programme Action 3.2.2 publicity public June 2014 internet print non public This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Communities. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Table of Contents Methodology ........................................................................................................................................... 4 1. General description of the current situation of the regions ............................................................... 5 1.1 Description of the Concept Regions .............................................................................................. 5 1.2 Demographic situation and development .................................................................................. 11 1.2.1 Demographic situation of the concept regions ................................................................... 11 1.2.2 Migration ............................................................................................................................. 15 1.2.3 Households .......................................................................................................................... 17
    [Show full text]
  • Grapevine Trunk Disease in European and Mediterranean Vineyards: Occurrence, Citation: Guerin-Dubrana L., Fontaine F., Mugnai L
    Phytopathologia Mediterranea Firenze University Press The international journal of the www.fupress.com/pm Mediterranean Phytopathological Union Current Topics Grapevine trunk disease in European and Mediterranean vineyards: occurrence, Citation: Guerin-Dubrana L., Fontaine F., Mugnai L. (2019) Grapevine trunk distribution and associated disease-affecting disease in European and Mediterra- nean vineyards: occurrence, distribu- cultural factors tion and associated disease-affecting cultural factors. Phytopathologia Medi- terranea 58(1): 49-71. doi: 10.14601/ Phytopathol_Mediterr-25153 Lucia GUERIN-DUBRANA1,*, Florence FONTAINE2, Laura MUGNAI3 1 Accepted: April 10, 2019 Université de Bordeaux, ISVV, UMR1065 Santé et Agroécologie du Vignoble, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, F-33175 Gradignan, France Published: May 15, 2019 2 Structure Fédérative de Recherche (SFR) Condorcet-FR CNRS 3417, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Unité de Recherche Résistance Induite et Bioprotection des Plantes Copyright: © 2019 Guerin-Dubrana L., EA 4707, BP 1039, (Cedex 2), F-51687 Reims, France Fontaine F., Mugnai L. This is an open 3 access, peer-reviewed article published Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali (DAG- by Firenze University Press (http:// RI) - Sez. Patologia vegetale ed Entomologia, University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cas- www.fupress.com/pm) and distributed cine 28, 50144 Florence, Italy under the terms of the Creative Com- *Corresponding author: [email protected] mons Attribution License, which per- mits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided Abstract. A survey was carried out in 22 European and some non-European Mediterra- the original author and source are nean countries in 2015 and 2016, to gain insights into the main fungal grapevine trunk credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Winemaking and Wine Tourism in the Light of Climate Change Zsolt Feldman State Secretary Ministry of Agriculture, Hungary
    Winemaking and wine tourism in the light of climate change Zsolt Feldman State secretary Ministry of Agriculture, Hungary 1 Vineyards 2012/13. 2013/14. 2014/15. 2015/16. 2016/17. 2017/18. Total area 65.8 58.8 60.5 62.1 63.9 65.2 (1000 ha) Grape production 281.7 406.3 364.3 415.1 414.9 457.7 (1000 t) Vineyards 51.2 58 59.5 59.8 60.3 57.7 harvested (1000 ha) 5.5 7.0 6.1 6.9 6.9 7.9 Yield (t/ha) Three EU member states have almost 75% of the total vineyards area of the EU: Spain (975 000 ha), France (785 000 ha) and Italy (690 000 ha). Hungary is among the mid- sized EU wine countries. The area of vineyards decresed after 1990, however, the tendency has seemed to turn into an increas after 2010. Since then, the area of vinyards has been emerging. 2 Vineyard area by wine regions Wine region 2012/13. 2013/14. 2014/15. 2015/16. 2016/17. 2017/18. Balaton 7.6 7.8 8.2 8.5 8.9 9.2 Duna 24 21.9 22.6 23 23.6 23.8 Felső- Magyarország 11.6 11.2 11.7 12 12.6 13 Felső-Pannon 4.9 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.4 5.6 Pannon 12.2 7.3 7.3 7.6 7.7 7.9 Tokaj 5.5 5.3 5.4 5.6 5.7 5.7 TOTAL 65.8 58.8 60.5 62.1 63.9 65.2 Forrás: HNT 1000 ha In our country the white grape production is more typical.
    [Show full text]