DOCSLIB.ORG

MSC SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES CERTIFICATION New Zealand Southern Blue Whiting Trawl Fishery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MSC SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES CERTIFICATION New Zealand Southern Blue Whiting Trawl Fishery Acoura Marine Final Report New Zealand southern Blue Whiting Trawl Fishery MSC SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES CERTIFICATION New Zealand Southern Blue Whiting Trawl Fishery Final Report August 2018 Prepared for: Deepwater Group Limited Prepared by: Acoura Marine Ltd Authors: Robert O’Boyle, Rob Blyth-Skyrme, Jo Akroyd and Paul Knapman Acoura Version V2.1 04/01/17 Acoura Marine Final Report New Zealand southern blue whiting trawl Contents Table of Tables ..................................................................................................................... 5 Table of Figures .................................................................................................................... 7 Glossary................................................................................................................................ 9 1 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 11 1 Authorship and Peer Reviewers ................................................................................... 13 1.1 Assessment Team ................................................................................................ 13 1.1.1 Peer Reviewers ............................................................................................. 15 1.1.2 Risk Based Framework (RBF) ....................................................................... 16 1.1.3 Introduced Species Based Fishery (ISBF) ..................................................... 16 2 Description of the Fishery ............................................................................................ 17 2.1 Unit of Certification (UoC) and Scope of Certification Sought ................................ 17 2.1.1 Target Species and Stocks ............................................................................ 17 2.1.2 Fishing Method .............................................................................................. 17 2.1.3 Client Group .................................................................................................. 17 2.1.4 Other Eligible Fishers ..................................................................................... 18 2.1.5 The UoCs ...................................................................................................... 18 2.2 Final UoC(s) .......................................................................................................... 20 2.2.1 Total Allowable Commercial Catch (TACC) and Catch Data .......................... 20 2.3 Overview of the fishery ......................................................................................... 20 3 Changes Since Initial Assessment ............................................................................... 23 3.1 Overview ............................................................................................................... 23 3.2 Specific Changes Since Initial Assessment ........................................................... 23 3.2.1 Principle 1 ...................................................................................................... 23 3.2.2 Principle 2 ...................................................................................................... 55 3.2.3 Background ................................................................................................... 55 3.2.4 Retained and bycatch species ....................................................................... 55 3.2.5 Endangered, threatened or protected (ETP) species ..................................... 57 3.2.6 Habitats ......................................................................................................... 66 3.2.7 Ecosystem ..................................................................................................... 69 3.2.8 Principle 3 ...................................................................................................... 70 3.2.9 Background ................................................................................................... 70 3.2.10 Jurisdiction ..................................................................................................... 70 3.2.11 Legal and Customary Framework .................................................................. 70 3.2.12 Consultation ................................................................................................... 71 3.2.13 Objectives for the fishery ............................................................................... 71 3.2.14 Decision making process ............................................................................... 72 3.2.15 Management Plans ........................................................................................ 73 3.2.16 Research Plan ............................................................................................... 74 Page 2 of 273 Acoura Marine Full Assessment Template per MSC V2.0 02/12/2015 Acoura Marine Final Report New Zealand southern blue whiting trawl 3.2.17 Compliance and Enforcement ........................................................................ 74 3.2.18 Monitoring of Performance ............................................................................. 76 4 Evaluation Procedure ................................................................................................... 77 4.1 Harmonised fishery assessment ........................................................................... 77 4.2 Previous assessments .......................................................................................... 78 4.3 Assessment Methodologies .................................................................................. 81 4.4 Evaluation Processes & Techniques ..................................................................... 81 4.4.1 Site Visit ......................................................................................................... 81 4.4.2 Consultations ................................................................................................. 82 4.4.3 Evaluation Techniques ................................................................................... 84 5 Traceability .................................................................................................................. 86 5.1 Eligibility Date ....................................................................................................... 86 5.2 Traceability Within the Fishery .............................................................................. 86 5.2.1 Tracking and Tracing ..................................................................................... 86 5.2.2 Vessels Fishing Outside the UoCs ................................................................. 86 5.2.3 At Sea Processing ......................................................................................... 87 5.2.4 Transhipping .................................................................................................. 87 5.2.5 Eligibility to Enter Further Chains of Custody ................................................. 88 5.3 Eligibility of Inseparable or Practicably Inseparable (IPI) stock(s) to Enter Further Chains of Custody ........................................................................................................... 89 6 Evaluation Results ....................................................................................................... 90 6.1 Principle Level and Performance Indicator Scores ................................................ 90 6.2 Summary of Conditions ......................................................................................... 91 6.3 Recommendations ................................................................................................ 91 6.4 Determination, Formal Conclusion and Agreement ............................................... 91 References ......................................................................................................................... 92 Appendices ....................................................................................................................... 101 Appendix 1 - Performance Indicator Scores and Rationale ............................................ 101 Evaluation Table for PI 1.1.1 – Stock status .................................................................. 101 Evaluation Table for PI 1.1.2 – Reference Points .......................................................... 103 Evaluation Table for PI 1.1.3 – Stock rebuilding ............................................................ 106 Evaluation Table for PI 1.2.1 – Harvest strategy ............................................................ 107 Evaluation Table for PI 1.2.2 – Harvest control rules and tools ...................................... 111 Evaluation Table for PI 1.2.3 – Information and monitoring............................................ 114 Evaluation Table for PI 1.2.4 – Assessment of stock status ........................................... 118 Evaluation Table for PI 2.1.1 – Retained species outcome ............................................ 122 Evaluation Table for PI 2.1.2 – Retained species management ..................................... 124 Evaluation Table for PI 2.1.3 – Retained species information ........................................ 127 Evaluation Table for PI 2.2.1 – Bycatch species outcome ............................................. 130 Evaluation Table for PI 2.2.2 – Bycatch
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Age and Growth of the Southern Blue Whiting Micromesistius Australis in the SW Atlantic*
    SCI. MAR., 64 (3): 269-274 SCIENTIA MARINA 2000 Age and growth of the southern blue whiting Micromesistius australis in the SW Atlantic* MARIA CRISTINA CASSIA Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero, Paseo Victoria Ocampo N° 1, Mar del Plata (7600), Argentina. E-mail: mccassia@ inidep.edu.ar SUMMARY: Age and growth of southern blue whiting Micromesistius australis are studied. Sagitta otoliths from 3650 specimens were used for age determination. These were taken during research surveys and commercial catches in the South West Atlantic during 1994 and 1995. The size of fishes ranged from 17 to 60 cm total length, corresponding to ages 0 to 23 years. Females attained a greater asymptotic length (L∞ 59.74 cm) than males (L∞ 54.72 cm). Comparison of growth curves by the likelihood ratio showed that the differences among females and males were due to the asymptotic length, while the other parameters (K and t0) were not statistically different. The mean weight-at-age, mean length-at-age, and total mortali- ty (Z) were estimated. Growth parameters estimated by sex in the period 1994-95, mean size per age group, and the num- ber of individuals per age in the catches show differences with those calculated when the population was in the early stage of exploitation. A predominance of 2 to 9 year old individuals was observed in the total catches in 1994-1995, whereas in the beginning of the fisheries total catches were basically fish 15 to 19 years old. Key words: Micromesistius australis, age, growth, population-age structure, Southwest Atlantic.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Whiting — a Key Species in the Mid-Water Ecosystems of the North-Eastern Atlantic
    International Council ICES CM 2002/L:28 forHeino the &Exploration Godø Theme Session L:ICES Census CM 2002/L:28of Marine of the Sea Life: Turning Concept into Reality Blue whiting — a key species in the mid-water ecosystems of the north-eastern Atlantic Mikko Heino and Olav Rune Godø Abstract. Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) is a mesopelagic gadoid that is widely distributed in northeastern Atlantic from the Canary Island to Spitsbergen. It is abundant and commercially exploited in the Norwegian Seas, off Iceland, Faeroe Islands, Hebrides and Ireland, and in the Bay of Biscay. Blue whiting is a highly migratory species. During the spawning season (March-April), blue whiting concentrates to dense aggregations on the well- known spawning locations along the shelf edge west of Ireland and Hebrides and in the Rockall area. Other spawning areas also exist, but stock structure, distribution and migration of this abundant species are insufficiently known. The oceanic distribution of blue whiting westward, towards the mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR), has not been thoroughly investigated. Scattered observations show that the species occurs along the MAR from the Azores in the south to the Reykjanes Ridge in the north. The possibility that blue whiting is a key species in the mi-water community of the MAR should not be dismissed. Where present, blue whiting is often highly abundant, and plays an important role in the pelagic ecosystems, both as a consumer of zooplankton and small mesopelagics, and as a prey for larger fish and cetaceans. Is there a ‘stock’ of blue whiting over the MAR? If yes, is this stock separate from the stock(s) in the northeastern Atlantic? Institute of Marine Research in Bergen has proposed a component project of MAR-ECO that combines routine monitoring information with observations from the MAR-ECO surveys to evaluate the significance of blue whiting in the pelagic ecosystem of the MAR.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Sexual Characteristics in Codfishes ([[Gadidae]]) in Relation to Sound Production, Habitat Use, and Social Behaviour
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Secondary sexual characteristics in codfishes ([[Gadidae]]) in relation to sound production, habitat use, and social behaviour Skjaeraasen, J.E., Meager, J.J. and Heino, M. IIASA Interim Report 2012 Skjaeraasen, J.E., Meager, J.J. and Heino, M. (2012) Secondary sexual characteristics in codfishes ([[Gadidae]]) in relation to sound production, habitat use, and social behaviour. IIASA Interim Report. IR-12-071 Copyright © 2012 by the author(s). http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/10208/ Interim Report on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis receive only limited review. Views or opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the Institute, its National Member Organizations, or other organizations supporting the work. All rights reserved. Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage. All copies must bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. For other purposes, to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, permission must be sought by contacting [email protected] International Institute for Tel: +43 2236 807 342 Applied Systems Analysis Fax: +43 2236 71313 Schlossplatz 1 E-mail: [email protected] A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria Web: www.iiasa.ac.at Interim Report IR-12-071 Secondary sexual characteristics in codfishes (Gadidae) in relation to sound production, habitat use, and social behaviour Jon Egil Skjæraasen Justin J.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems – Processes and Practices in the High Seas Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems Processes and Practices in the High Seas
    ISSN 2070-7010 FAO 595 FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE TECHNICAL PAPER 595 Vulnerable marine ecosystems – Processes and practices in the high seas Vulnerable marine ecosystems Processes and practices in the high seas This publication, Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems: processes and practices in the high seas, provides regional fisheries management bodies, States, and other interested parties with a summary of existing regional measures to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems from significant adverse impacts caused by deep-sea fisheries using bottom contact gears in the high seas. This publication compiles and summarizes information on the processes and practices of the regional fishery management bodies, with mandates to manage deep-sea fisheries in the high seas, to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems. ISBN 978-92-5-109340-5 ISSN 2070-7010 FAO 9 789251 093405 I5952E/2/03.17 Cover photo credits: Photo descriptions clockwise from top-left: Acanthagorgia spp., Paragorgia arborea, Vase sponges (images courtesy of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada); and Callogorgia spp. (image courtesy of Kirsty Kemp, the Zoological Society of London). FAO FISHERIES AND Vulnerable marine ecosystems AQUACULTURE TECHNICAL Processes and practices in the high seas PAPER 595 Edited by Anthony Thompson FAO Consultant Rome, Italy Jessica Sanders Fisheries Officer FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Rome, Italy Merete Tandstad Fisheries Resources Officer FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Rome, Italy Fabio Carocci Fishery Information Assistant FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Rome, Italy and Jessica Fuller FAO Consultant Rome, Italy FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2016 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997
    The IUCN Species Survival Commission Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997 Edited by Sarah L. Fowler, Tim M. Reed and Frances A. Dipper Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 25 IUCN The World Conservation Union Donors to the SSC Conservation Communications Programme and Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management: Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997 The IUCN/Species Survival Commission is committed to communicate important species conservation information to natural resource managers, decision-makers and others whose actions affect the conservation of biodiversity. The SSC's Action Plans, Occasional Papers, newsletter Species and other publications are supported by a wide variety of generous donors including: The Sultanate of Oman established the Peter Scott IUCN/SSC Action Plan Fund in 1990. The Fund supports Action Plan development and implementation. To date, more than 80 grants have been made from the Fund to SSC Specialist Groups. The SSC is grateful to the Sultanate of Oman for its confidence in and support for species conservation worldwide. The Council of Agriculture (COA), Taiwan has awarded major grants to the SSC's Wildlife Trade Programme and Conservation Communications Programme. This support has enabled SSC to continue its valuable technical advisory service to the Parties to CITES as well as to the larger global conservation community. Among other responsibilities, the COA is in charge of matters concerning the designation and management of nature reserves, conservation of wildlife and their habitats, conservation of natural landscapes, coordination of law enforcement efforts as well as promotion of conservation education, research and international cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Gadiformes Selected Meristic Characters in Species Belonging to the Order Gadiformes Whose Adults Or Larvae Have Been Collected in the Study Area
    548 Gadiformes Selected meristic characters in species belonging to the order Gadiformes whose adults or larvae have been collected in the study area. Total vertebrae, second dorsal and anal fin rays are numerous in the Bathygadidae and Macrouridae, but are seldom reported. Classification sequence and sources of meristic data: Eschmeyer, 1990; Fahay and Markle, 1984; Fahay, 1989; Cohen et al., 1990; Iwamoto, 2002; Iwamoto and Cohen, 2002a; 2002b; Merrett, 2003. PrC = principal caudal rays; ~ = approximately Family Precaudal Total Dorsal Anal Pectoral Pelvic Species Vertebrae Vertebrae Fin Rays Fin Rays Fin Rays Fin Rays Bregmacerotidae Bregmaceros atlanticus 14 53–55 47–56 49–58 16–21 5–7 Bregmaceros cantori 14 45–49 45–49 45–49 16–23 (family) 5–7 Bregmaceros sp. 14–15 52–59 52–59 58–69 16–23 (family) 5–7 Bregmaceros houdei 13–14 47–50 47–50 41–46 16–23 (family) 5–7 Family Precaudal Total First + Second Anal Pectoral Pelvic Species Vertebrae Vertebrae Dorsal Fin Rays Fin Rays Fin Rays Fin Rays Bathygadidae Bathygadus favosus 12–14 ~70 9–11+125 110 15–18 9(10) Gadomus dispar 12–13 80+ 12–13 – 18–20 8 Gadomus longifilis 11–13 – 9–11 – 14–16 8–9 Macrouridae Caelorinchus caribbeus 11–12 – 11–12+>110 >110 17–20 7 Caelorinchus coelorhynchus 11–12 – 10–11 – (17)18–20(21) 7 Caelorinchus occa 12–13 – 9–11 – 17–20 7 Coryphaenoides alateralis – 13 – 21–23 8 Coryphaenoides armatus 13–15 – 10–12+~125 ~135 19–21 10–11 Coryphaenoides brevibarbis 12–13 – 9 – 19–20 8–9 Coryphaenoides carapinus 12–15 – 10–11+100 117 17–20 9–11 Coryphaenoides guentheri
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing the Conflict Between Cormorants and Fisheries on a Pan-European Scale
    Reducing the conflict between Cormorants and fisheries on a pan-European scale REDCAFE Final Report Report of a Concerted Action funded by the European Union. Study contract no. Q5CA-2000-31387: Reducing the conflict between cormorants and fisheries on a pan-European scale. Edited by D N Carss Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Banchory, Hill of Brathens, Banchory Aberdeenshire, AB31 4BW, Scotland, UK. Natural Environment Research Council Centre for Ecology & Hydrology CEH Banchory Hill of Brathens Banchory Aberdeenshire AB31 4BY Scotland, UK. Fax: +44 1330 823303 Internet: [email protected] Web: www.banchory.ceh.ac.uk CEH Contract Number: C01749 Reducing the conflict between cormorants and fisheries on a pan-European scale Final Report Edited by: D N Carss Commissioned by: European Commission DG XIV Directorate-General for Fisheries Rue de la Loi 200 Bâtiment J II 99 6/11 B-1049 Brussels, Belgium Contract number: Q5CA-2000-31387 This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission and in no way anticipates any future opinion of the Commission. The contents of the report may not be reproduced unless the source of the material is indicated. This study has been carried out with the financial assistance of the European Commission. This report is drafted at the request of the commissioner indicated above and is his property. Nothing from this report may be reproduced and/or published by print, photoprint microfilm or any other means without the previous written consent from the commissioner of the study. Photographs on the cover (Top left, clockwise): Great cormorant © David Grémillet, coastal fisheries, Greece © Dave Carss, recreational fisherman © Trout & Salmon magazine, Danish pound net fishermen, © DC, Roach © Roger Phillips and Martyn Rix, REDCAFE participants, Waltham Abbey, November 2002, © Szymon Bzoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Potential of Pacific Cod (Gadus Macrocephalus) in Alaska
    Reproductive Potential Of Pacific Cod (Gadus Macrocephalus) In Alaska Item Type Thesis Authors Ormseth, Olav Aleksander Download date 28/09/2021 04:53:02 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/8941 REPRODUCTIVE POTENTIAL OF PACIFIC COD (GADUS MACROCEPHALUS) IN ALASKA A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Olav Aleksander Ormseth, M.S. Fairbanks, Alaska December 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 3302509 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ® UMI UMI Microform 3302509 Copyright 2008 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 E. Eisenhower Parkway PO Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. REPRODUCTIVE POTENTIAL OF PACIFIC COD (GADUS MACROCEPHALUS) IN ALASKA By Olav Aleksander Ormseth RECOMMENDED: A Advisory Committee Chair Head, Program in Marine Science and Limnology APPROVED: DearTT^chool of Fisheries and Oc&an Sciences Dean of the Graduate $ 'f - 2 o 0 7 Date Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Blue Whiting (Sbw)
    SOUTHERN BLUE WHITING (SBW) SOUTHERN BLUE WHITING (SBW) (Micromesistius australis) 1. FISHERY SUMMARY 1.1 Commercial fisheries Southern blue whiting are almost entirely restricted in distribution to Sub-Antarctic waters. They are dispersed throughout the Campbell Plateau and Bounty Platform for much of the year, but during August and September they aggregate to spawn near the Campbell Islands, on Pukaki Rise, on Bounty Platform, and near the Auckland Islands over depths of 250–600 m. During most years, fish in the spawning fishery range between 35 and 50 cm fork length (FL), although occasionally a smaller size class of males (29–32 cm FL) is also present. Reported landings for the period 1971 to 1977 are shown in Table 1. Estimated landings by area from the trawl catch and effort logbooks and QMRs are given from 1978 to the present in Table 2, while Figure 1 shows the historical landings and TACC values for the main southern blue whiting stocks. Landings were chiefly taken by the Soviet foreign licensed fleet during the 1970s and early 1980s, and the fishery fluctuated considerably peaking at almost 50 000 t in 1973 and again at almost 30 000 t in 1979. The Japanese surimi vessels first entered the fishery in 1986, and catches gradually increased to a peak of 76 000 t in 1991–92. A catch limit of 32 000 t, with area sub-limits, was introduced for the first time in the 1992–93 fishing year (Table 2). The total catch limit increased to 58 000 t in 1996–97 for three years.
    [Show full text]
  • Kai Lorenzen
    Kai Lorenzen Curriculum Vitae April 2021 Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Program Phone: (+1) 352-273-3646 School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences Cell: (+1) 352-213-7662 University of Florida Fax: (+1) 352-392-3672 7922 NW 71 st St Email: [email protected] Gainesville, FL 32653 Web: ffgs.ifas.ufl.edu United States fisheriessolutions.org EDUCATION 1997 Ph.D. Applied Population Biology, Imperial College, University of London, UK 1993 Diplom (M.S.) Fisheries Biology with Zoology and Mathematics (Grade 1.0, Highest Distinction), Kiel University, Germany EMPLOYMENT 2019 - Associate Director & Program Leader for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, USA. 2010 - Professor (Full) of Integrative Fisheries Science, School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, USA. 2005-2010 Senior Lecturer (Associate Professor) in Aquatic Resource Ecology, Division of Biology, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, UK 2003-2005 Senior Lecturer (Associate Professor) in Fisheries, Department of Environmental Science and Technology, Imperial College London, UK 1997-2003 Lecturer (Assistant Professor) in Fisheries, Huxley School of Environment Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, UK 1997 Postdoctoral Fellow, Imperial College, University of London, UK 1992-1996 Fisheries Development Consultant, MRAG Ltd., London, UK 1984-1986 Community Care Worker, Hamburg, Germany VISITING AND HONORARY APPOINTMENTS 2020- Research Affiliate, Florida Sea Grant, Gainesville, FL, USA. 2014-2019 Fisheries Extension Specialist, Florida Sea Grant, Gainesville, FL, USA. 2009- Adjunct Scientist, Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, FL, USA. 2007-2008 William R and Lenore Mote Eminent Scholar Chair in Fisheries Ecology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes-Of-The-Salish-Sea-Pp18.Pdf
    NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 18 Fishes of the Salish Sea: a compilation and distributional analysis Theodore W. Pietsch James W. Orr September 2015 U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA Professional Penny Pritzker Secretary of Commerce Papers NMFS National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Kathryn D. Sullivan Scientifi c Editor Administrator Richard Langton National Marine Fisheries Service National Marine Northeast Fisheries Science Center Fisheries Service Maine Field Station Eileen Sobeck 17 Godfrey Drive, Suite 1 Assistant Administrator Orono, Maine 04473 for Fisheries Associate Editor Kathryn Dennis National Marine Fisheries Service Offi ce of Science and Technology Fisheries Research and Monitoring Division 1845 Wasp Blvd., Bldg. 178 Honolulu, Hawaii 96818 Managing Editor Shelley Arenas National Marine Fisheries Service Scientifi c Publications Offi ce 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, Washington 98115 Editorial Committee Ann C. Matarese National Marine Fisheries Service James W. Orr National Marine Fisheries Service - The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS (ISSN 1931-4590) series is published by the Scientifi c Publications Offi ce, National Marine Fisheries Service, The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series carries peer-reviewed, lengthy original NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, research reports, taxonomic keys, species synopses, fl ora and fauna studies, and data- Seattle, WA 98115. intensive reports on investigations in fi shery science, engineering, and economics. The Secretary of Commerce has Copies of the NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series are available free in limited determined that the publication of numbers to government agencies, both federal and state. They are also available in this series is necessary in the transac- exchange for other scientifi c and technical publications in the marine sciences.
    [Show full text]