DOCSLIB.ORG

Yorkshire and Humber Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation  Foreword

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yorkshire and Humber Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation  Foreword Yorkshire and Humber Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation Foreword It is a pleasure to introduce the Route The additional capacity provided at Leeds in Utilisation Strategy (RUS) for Yorkshire and the last five years has already been largely Humber. This RUS, like the previous ones, used up as a result of the growth in demand, sets out the strategic vision for the future of and the RUS identifies the best solution for a particular part of the rail network. the next decade as being the introduction of more short distance cross-Leeds services in The network in Yorkshire and Humber is the peak. It proposes an additional service incredibly diverse, with heavily used services each hour between Leeds and Manchester, and fast-growing demand into the larger cities as well as some journey time improvements. such as Leeds and Sheffield and across the Additionally, the proposal in the East Coast Pennines to Manchester. There is a great Main Line RUS to introduce a regular clock- deal of freight traffic, particularly to and from face timetable should assist considerably the ports. By contrast, some rural parts of the in terms of both local and “east to network are relatively lightly used. west” services. A number of generic gaps have been Further into the future we can expect to see identified. These include the need for further journey time improvements between additional capacity at peak hours for Leeds and Manchester, between Leeds and commuters into the cities and in the core Sheffield, between Sheffield and Manchester, Leeds to Manchester corridor; the need to and between Bradford and Manchester. A improve inter-urban connectivity in certain “standard hour” service of three fast trains places, including Bradford to Manchester; per hour is proposed between Sheffield and a requirement for greater freight capability Manchester. More freight paths will become in terms of capacity, loading gauge, route available across the Yorkshire and Humber availability and diversionary routes; and a region to respond to the projected demand. pressing need to address those parts of the infrastructure which can cause very As with each of our Route Utilisation significant delays. Strategies, this has been developed with the full input of the rest of the industry including This strategy recommends a number train and freight operators. I thank them for of options to be taken forward to address their contribution to date. This is a draft for these gaps. Key to the strategy is consultation so we are now seeking feedback addressing peak-hour passenger growth and comments to support and inform our through train lengthening, supplemented further analysis. Comments are invited before by additional shuttle services at the times a deadline of 18 December 008 and we are of heaviest demand and as new rolling working towards publication of the final RUS stock becomes available, and to address for Yorkshire and Humber in Spring 009. the issues surrounding the presently limited freight capability. Iain Coucher Chief Executive Executive summary Introduction The RUS covers broadly the area from This Yorkshire and Humber Route Utilisation Scarborough, Hull and Cleethorpes in the east Strategy (RUS) Draft for Consultation has to Newark, Chinley, Stalybridge, Rochdale and followed the now well-established RUS process, Skipton in the west, with the exception of the with extensive stakeholder involvement. The East Coast Main Line (ECML). It considers RUS area is characterised by a diversity of issues over an 11-year time period from 008. both train service and stakeholders. On the one It has had issues passed to it from the North hand, there are heavily used inter-urban and West RUS, the Lancashire and Cumbria RUS, urban services, and on the other, particularly the ECML RUS and the Freight RUS. The in the eastern part of the area, relatively lightly Network RUS currently under development used rural operations. Some parts of the will also address some issues such as network, such as Immingham, are very heavily electrification, which may impact on the used by freight traffic whilst others are solely RUS area. passenger. Similarly, there is no one body responsible for transport planning such as Process Transport for London or Transport Scotland. The RUS initially analyses the current Whilst the interests of the principal urban areas capability and capacity of the railway in order are represented by South Yorkshire Passenger to measure its ability to cater reliably for Transport Executive (PTE) and West Yorkshire existing demand and thereby highlight any PTE (and to a lesser extent – in terms of present-day “gaps”. Forecasts of predicted geography rather than roles and responsibilities demand over the coming 11 years are then – Greater Manchester PTE), local authorities examined, and forecast future gaps identified. in the remainder of the area range from These forecasts take account of committed geographically very large shire counties such schemes which are known to be coming on as North Yorkshire to quite compact unitary stream in the next few years. authorities. The National Park Authorities also A set of options is then generated which could have a role to play. potentially bridge the known and predicted Scope and background gaps. These options are then analysed in The Yorkshire and Humber RUS adjoins order to gain an understanding about which the infrastructure covered by the of them look to offer the most promising and already-published East Coast Main Line, value-for-money solutions. North West and Lancashire and Cumbria At this stage, the RUS is put out to RUSs, and the East Midlands RUS currently consultation in order for stakeholder responses in preparation. Several members of the rail to be sought and considered, and thereby industry Stakeholder Management Group for options to be refined. This consultation (SMG) are common to some or all of these document has been prepared to support this RUSs. There is a considerable interface part of the process. A finalised strategy will with the North West RUS in the corridors then be prepared and published in early 009. from South and West Yorkshire to Greater The Yorkshire and Humber RUS process is Manchester. overseen and directed by the SMG, which comprises representatives from the Train Increasingly, these do not fit comfortably with: Operating Companies (TOCs), Freight demand for passenger services to operate Operating Companies (FOCs), the Department later on weekday evenings and to start earlier for Transport (DfT), Network Rail, Association on Sunday mornings; growing demand of Train Operating Companies (ATOC), – especially on south Humberside – for Passenger Focus, the PTEs and the Office of -hour freight access; and a strong desire Rail Regulation (ORR) (as observers). that passenger services in key corridors should as far as possible be free from bus Gaps substitution. This RUS identified six generic gaps: Regional links: There is a perception of poor Peak crowding and suppressed growth: connectivity in certain corridors. In particular, Demand for rail commuting into Leeds, the service between Bradford and Manchester Sheffield and Manchester has been growing is slow by comparison with services between strongly in recent years with the result that other major centres, as a result of numerous many trains during the high peak are now station stops combined with some low speed close to or in a few cases beyond their nominal restrictions. The Sheffield – Manchester capacity. Significant overcrowding in peak hours service is considered to be unattractive at two is forecast if additional capacity is not provided. fast trains per hour when compared with the Off-peak crowding and suppressed growth: Leeds – Manchester frequency. Growth in demand for fast cross-Pennine Freight capability: Parts of the RUS area services in the core Manchester – Leeds via have restrictive loading gauge clearance when Diggle corridor has been exceptionally strong compared with the Freight RUS aspirations in recent years and significant overcrowding for W9, W10 and W1. Such restrictions is forecast such that demand management reduce the suitability of the lines affected for measures will be required if additional diversionary purposes, as well as hindering capacity is not provided. This prediction is development of the intermodal container based on growth predictions of an average market. Identified key capacity pinch-points, of .6 percent per year and is dependent on such as the Hope Valley and Hare Park a number of assumptions, in particular fares – South Kirkby, threaten to handicap future policy (RPI+1 percent is assumed, potentially growth in the freight business. The absence of conservative for unregulated fares) and any loops of 77 metres within the RUS area external effects such as road congestion and limits the options for running the longest freight motoring costs. There are only very limited trains in line with FOC aspirations. opportunities to add services to meet this demand without restructuring the timetable. Engineering access: On certain route sections, present methods of maintenance and renewal imply regular and lengthy possessions to keep the infrastructure fit for purpose. Reactionary delays: A number of key Short-term strategy 2009 – 2014 locations have been identified where very (Control Period 4) significant delays occur, notably Whitehall Train services Junction, Sheffield station, Swinton junctions The general approach will be that of and Rochdale station. Congestion at these progressive train lengthening
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download from Our Website Or Pick One up When You Thrilling Mix of Sheffield Bands Including Dead Like Pop Down for a Coffee at Our Coffee Mornings
    TOTLEY INDEPENDENT PUBLISHED BY THE TOTLEY RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION CONTINUOUSLY SINCE 1977 JULY/AUGUST 2010 No. 335 20p. I enclose a very old picture of The Fleur De Lys. This was passed on to my son Gary by and old Totley resident no longer living in the village. I would speculate after speaking to a few older and former residents it would be approximately early 1900. Pubs were often known by the owner or landlord’s name hence Greens. Similarly in my younger days The Peacock at Owler Bar was known locally as Johnny Braughm’s. I would think the present Fleur was completed around 1930. J W Abson. Totley Residents Association Update Success at last!! After countless phone calls over several years, we have finally won. The “new” bus shelter at the Baslow Road / Glover Road corner is now operational, it only took 5 months to complete the tarmac and put in the glass! The same week as this was done, the other two bus shelters were finally turned round. Instead of sheltering the wall, waiting passengers are now protected from splashing by speeding traffic by the shelter. It has taken a combined effort by disgruntled residents writing to The Star, many complaints by suffering residents to Highways, Streetforce and South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive and a continual regular stream of phone calls by yours truly to win the day. We did not give up and eventually we have won. Good news followed by bad. I expect you are all aware that Abbeydale Garden Centre has been sold to make way for a car park.
    [Show full text]
  • Collision. Wrawby Junction. 1983-12-09
    RAILWAY~NSPECTORATE DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORT 2 MARSHAMSTREET LONDON SWIP 3EB 19th March 1985. I have the honour to report, for the information of the Secretary of State, in accordance with the Direc- tion of 21st December 1983 the result of my Inquiry into the collision between a freight train and apassenger train that occurred at about 18.18 on 9th December 1983 at Wrawby Junction, near Scunthorpe, in the Eastern Region of British Railways. 2. The 17.32 Cleethorpes to Sheffield 2-car Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) passenger train was travelling along the Down Fast lineat about 5 mile/h when it was struck about midway along the right-hand side of the leading carriage by Locomotive No. 47299 which was hauling the 15.02 Drax to Lindsey freight train compris- ing 9 empty oil tank wagons. Because a track-circuit failure prevented a set of points from operating and the protecting signals from clearing, the signalman had hand-cranked the points to the Normal position. He failed to clamp them Normal as he should have done. Both trains had been called forward under caution but the freight train driver failed to stop at the signal box. His train was diverted at low speed into the side of the passenger train through the points that had, in the meantime, reset themselves to the Reverse position. 3 The leading vehicle of the DMU was derailed and turned onto its side, the trailing vehicle was derailed but remainedupright. There were 1 I passengerson the DMU and1 regret to report that on'eof them was killed instantly, the Emergency Services were quickly at the scene and 3 others were taken to hospital 2 of whom were discharged after treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Draftrail Strategy
    South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Authority DRAFT RAIL STRATEGY Consultation Draft – October 2008 South Yorkshire, Making Rail a Better Choice 1 South Yorkshire, Making Rail a Better Choice Contents Contents Page Executive Summary 4 1. Introduction 5 2. The Rail Strategy in Context 9 National Context 10 Regional Context 10 Context Diagram 10 Strategy Objectives 11 3. Current Conditions 13 South Yorkshire Network 13 Local Network 13 Express Long Distance 15 Open Access 17 Freight 18 Rolling Stock 21 Train Capacity 23 South Yorkshire Stations 24 Access to Stations 28 Network Performance 29 Network Constraints 32 Ticketing and Pricing 34 Recent Land Use and Demand Changes 35 4. Recent Research 37 5. Future Conditions 39 Future Demand 39 New Stations 40 New Lines 41 Delivery Priorities 43 6. Action Plan 43 Details of Delivery/Funding 43 7. Monitoring and Consultation 46 Details of current Monitoring 46 Reporting processes 46 Consultation 48 2 Appendix One – The Rail Strategy in Context Appendix Two – Network Diagram/Map Appendix Three – Current Station Standards and Facilities Appendix Four – Proposed Housing Growth related to Rail Stations Appendix Five – Network bottlenecks and scheme dependencies Appendix Six – Delivery Plan 3 Executive Summary Executive Summary South Yorkshire, Making Rail a Better Choice To be drafted once contents are endorsed 4 Chapter 1 Introduction South Yorkshire, Making Rail a Better Choice Summary This document brings together changes in contextual policy and investment plans and Identifies the role of the Rail Strategy Provides an update on work completed since 2004 Summarises key developments and the effect on rail users Links all the above to explain the need for change Provides the planned actions to take the Strategy forward in the short, medium and long term 1.1 This Rail Strategy is produced by South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive (SYPTE), on behalf of South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Authority (SYPTA) and represents an update of the previous strategy issued in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards an Understanding of the Contemporary Artist-Led Collective
    The Ecology of Cultural Space: Towards an Understanding of the Contemporary Artist-led Collective John David Wright University of Leeds School of Fine Art, History of Art and Cultural Studies Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2019 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of John David Wright to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. 1 Acknowledgments Thank you to my supervisors, Professor Abigail Harrison Moore and Professor Chris Taylor, for being both critical and constructive throughout. Thank you to members of Assemble and the team at The Baltic Street Playground for being incredibly welcoming, even when I asked strange questions. I would like to especially acknowledge Fran Edgerley for agreeing to help build a Yarn Community dialogue and showing me Sugarhouse Studios. A big thank you to The Cool Couple for engaging in construcutive debate on wide-ranging subject matter. A special mention for all those involved in the mapping study, you all responded promptly to my updates. Thank you to the members of the Retro Bar at the End of the Universe, you are my friends and fellow artivists! I would like to acknowledge the continued support I have received from the academic community in the School of Fine Art, History of Art and Cultural Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 1994 Issn 0965-8912
    'DOOR DORE VILLAGE SOCIETY No. 34 SUMMER 1994 ISSN 0965-8912 Review of Acute Services- Sheffield Health Authority For some months Sheffield Health Authority has been considering the future provision of acute services for the people of Sheffield. In order to meet financial constraints and offer a service appropriate to the needs of the population, various options were considered. A proposal to close Nether Edge Hospital was announced. This was met with some dismay by those who have personally, or have family/friends, who benefited from the quality rehabilitation service offered in such pleasant surroundings. Some services will be relocated, albeit on a smaller scale and the resultant saving from the closure will allow for development of services in the Community. New facilities to replace the ageing Jessop Hospital are required. The desirability of easy access to the Children's Hospital favour the Royal Hallamshire/Stonegrove site as an option. It is the future location of the Accident and Emergency services that should be of Full steam ahead. Local dignatries are shown Totley Tunnel shortly before its official opening to particular concern to the people of Dore. It is regular passenger traffic in 1894. Work on coordinating a celebration of the tunnel's opening is very easy to be emotional about the possibility now well advanced with exhibitions, a fete and steam hauled trains planned. of having a single site Accident and Emergency Department at the Northern experts in facial injuries ~- all based at the General Hospital. Royal Hallamshire? Council Elections The big questions are:- • Has full consultation been made with other • Is it essential to opt for a single site hospitals such as Chesterfield, which are Following the Local Elections on 5th May, provision? more accessible to many Sheffield Dore has a new councillor - Colin Ross of • Can we be sure that the implications for residents than Northern General.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire Rail Campaigner Number 48 – March 2020
    Yorkshire Rail Campaigner Number 48 – March 2020 Yorkshire President: Alan Whitehouse: Vice-Presidents: Mike Crowhurst, Alan Williams & Chris Hyomes Trans-Pennine Upgrade Under Threat! By Mark Parry With the proposed trans-Pennine high speed line being supported, we feared the upgrade of the existing line had been quietly forgotten. Transpennine Express new rolling stock at Manchester Piccadilly–Photo by Robert Pritchard The following is a joint press release from our branch and HADRAG: The Halifax & District Rail Action Group; SHRUG: Stalybridge to Huddersfield Rail Users Group; UCVRSTG: Upper Calder Valley Renaissance Sustainable Transport Group. CAMPAIGNERS in West Yorkshire are extremely concerned about lack of progress by the Government and Network Rail on infrastructure proposals that should deliver improvements for travellers in the next few years, including the TransPennine Route Upgrade (TRU). Three rail user groups and the Yorkshire Branch of Railfuture have written to Andrew Haines, Chief Executive of Network Rail, who was recently been quoted as casting doubt on TRU. In a magazine interview (RAIL 897, 29 Jan’2020) Haines had said the scope of TRU could depend on the high-speed rail proposal “Northern Powerhouse Rail” (NPR). The campaigners say NPR is decades away and will not benefit stations on regional routes that desperately need investment now. Continued overleaf… Railfuture, Yorkshire & North West Joint Branch Meeting This meeting has been postponed because of concerns about the Coronavirus. We will contact members later about alterative arrangements. 1 | Railfuture: Yorkshire Rail Campaigner 4 8 – M a r c h 2020 The campaigners have also written to Secretary of State for Transport Grant Shapps MP, and to the new Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak, calling for urgent, overdue projects to go ahead without further delay.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Aggregate Assessment 2017
    Doncaster and Rotherham Local Aggregate Assessment 2017 Incorporating 2016 Aggregates Monitoring Data (Endorsed by the Yorkshire and Humber Aggregates Working Party October 2017) Prepared by: Local Plans Team: Directorate of Regeneration and Environment: Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council, Floor 4, Civic Office, Waterdale, Doncaster, DN1 3BU Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 2016 Monitoring Information .............................................................................................. 5 Mineral Sites...................................................................................................................... 5 2016 Annual Monitoring Report for Doncaster and Rotherham Mineral Planning Authorities .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Sand and Gravel .................................................................................................................. 6 Table 1 Sand and Gravel Aggregate and Non-Aggregate sales 2006 to 2015 (Mt) ............ 6 Reserves of Sand and Gravel for Aggregate Use .............................................................. 6 Table 2 Reserves of Sand and Gravel for Aggregate Use ................................................. 6 New Permissions
    [Show full text]
  • London North Eastern Region Commentary 04
    Timetable Planning Rules London North Eastern 2020 TIMETABLE Version 2.0 Issued by Amy Forte Timetable Production Manager The Quadrant MK Elder Gate Milton Keynes MK9 1EN Tel: 07801 334042 Final Proposal for Principal Change Timetable 2020 8th February 2019 NETWORK RAIL Timetable Planning Rules Version: 2.0 London North Eastern Final Proposal for Principal Change Date: 8 February 2019 Timetable 2020 Page: 2 of 322 Contents Section Page no. Section Page no. 5.1 Sectional Running Times .........................................74 1 Introduction and General Notes .................... 3 5.1.1 Source of Current SRTs ...................................74 1.1 Index of Routes ............................................................. 4 5.1.2 Method of Calculation .......................................74 1.2 Sectional Appendices and Rule Book .................. 7 5.1.3 New and Revised Sectional Running Times75 1.2.1 Sectional Appendix .............................................. 7 5.1.4 Timing of Trains Consisting of Passenger 1.2.2 Rule Book ................................................................ 7 Vehicles on Goods Lines ............................................75 1.3 Definitions ....................................................................... 9 5.2 Headways ......................................................................75 1.3.1 Train Classification .............................................. 9 5.2.1 Headway Values .................................................75 1.3.2 Days of Operation ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kingston University London
    KINGSTON UNIVERSITY LONDON “The Role of Institutional Entrepreneurs in Shaping the Renewable Energy Subfield in the UK during the Period 1986-2016” By Leigh St Aubyn CHAMPAGNIE Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Kingston University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy SPONSORS: YTL CORPORATION and KINGSTON UNIVERSITY SBRC FEBRUARY 2020 i ABSTRACT Historically, energy systems have contributed significantly to global carbon emissions. To address this concern, countries such as the United Kingdom (UK) have embraced technologies such as renewable energy to try and reduce their carbon footprints. In the case of the UK, this led to the renewable energy subfield becoming partially institutionalised under the enabling role of actors, which suggests that this type of institutional change warrants being examined through the lens of institutional entrepreneurship theory. This doctoral thesis rises to the challenge by conducting institutional entrepreneurship research to investigate the institutionalisation of the renewable energy subfield in the UK during the period 1986-2016. Such an investigation is of social significance because the institutionalisation of the renewable energy subfield is likely to contribute to deinstitutionalising polluting technologies such as fossil fuels, thus contributing to the UK’s transition to a low carbon economy. The thesis is an exploratory, qualitative case study that combines thirty-nine semi-structured interviews of respondents connected to the field of energy provision in the UK with an analysis of archival documents. It finds that multiple actors practised as institutional entrepreneurs during the period, these being the state and its various agencies; renewable energy practitioners/activists; incumbent energy practitioners; the European Union and the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • TO LET Kiosk Opportunity
    TO LET Retail Kiosk Opportunity Bradford Forster Square Station, Forster Square, Bradford BD1 4AZ Available on Request Prominent position Tenant supplied kiosk Suitable for catering, coffee shop or other retail use Approximately 2,159,100 passenger movements annually Lambert Smith Hampton 9 Bond Court, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS1 2JZ T: 0113 245 9393 Bradford Forster Square Station, Forster Square, Bradford BD1 4AZ VAT All prices, premiums and rents, etc are quoted exclusive of VAT at the prevailing rate. LEGAL COSTS Each party to be responsible for their own legal costs incurred in any transaction. BUSINESS RATES Please consult directly with the Valuation Office Agency. RENT The Landlord is seeking a rental offer based on a % of turnover subject to a minimum guaranteed rent. SERVICE CHARGE LOCATION The service charge will be the equivalent of 7.5% of the annual rent. Bradford Forster Square Station serves the Airedale Line to Skipton, the Wharfedale Line to Ilkley and the Leeds-Bradford Line to Leeds. INSURANCE The Station is situated next to Bradford Forster Square Retail Park and The insurance charge will be the equivalent of 2.5% of the annual within close proximity of the city centre. rent. DESCRIPTION On behalf of Northern an opportunity has arisen for a tenant supplied kiosk to be erected within the station concourse. KEY FEATURES Prominent position Prominent position Tenant supplied kiosk Suitable for catering, coffee shop or other retail use Approximately 2,159,100 passenger movements annually Available immediately 01-Nov-2018 VIEWING & FURTHER INFORMATION Viewing strictly by prior appointment www.lsh.co.uk Maria Neethling © Lambert Smith Hampton 0113 245 9393 The agents on their behalf and for the Vendors or Lessors of this property whose Agents they are, give notice that: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Otley TC Rail Study Final Report March 2004
    Otley Rail Link Study Final Report in association with Otley Rail Link Study Final Report in association with Job number Prepared by Verified by Approved by Status Issue number Date D048006 SW / JCS FINAL 1 05/03/2004 JMP Consultants Ltd Otley Rail Link Study – Final Report Otley Rail Link Study Final Report Contents 0 Executive summary.......................................................................................0 1 Introduction....................................................................................................2 2 Study approach.............................................................................................4 3 Infrastructure elements .................................................................................6 Permanent way and earthworks............................................................................ 6 Structures ................................................................................................................. 9 Station design........................................................................................................ 10 Electrification......................................................................................................... 12 Signalling ............................................................................................................... 12 Infrastructure costs................................................................................................ 12 Summary...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 1 Air Quality Review and Assessment
    FOREWORD The Government attaches great importance to the opportunities for partnership, which the management of local air quality brings. The Environment Act 1995 provides the statutory basis for consultation and liaison on the Stage 1 review and assessment and the Government expects local authorities to develop a closer relationship with other agencies, commerce and local community groups who may be able to contribute to the improvement of local air quality. For the purpose of reviewing and assessing air quality local authorities need to consult in accordance with Schedule 2 of the Act. It is proposed that consultation be carried out with: I. The Secretary of State II. The relevant Environment Agency III. The relevant highways authority IV. All neighbouring local authorities V. Any relevant National Park Authority VI. Other relevant public authorities as the local authority considers appropriate e.g. Parish Councils VII. Bodies representative of business interests Widespread consultation among the general public of the East Riding will be secured by depositing copies of this document at all Customer Service Centres, public libraries and in local secondary schools. All consultees or other interested parties wishing to comment on the review are asked to make their responses to the Director of Social Services, Housing and Public Protection, County Hall, Beverley HU17 9BA by 31 March 1999. 1 SUMMARY The Environment Act 1995 required the preparation of a National Air Quality Strategy which provides a framework for air quality control through local air quality management. Air quality standards and objectives have been enacted through the Air Quality Regulations 1997. Local Authorities are required to undertake a staged air quality review and assessment.
    [Show full text]