EARTH OBSERVATIONS and GLOBAL CHANGE Why? Where Are We? What Next?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EARTH OBSERVATIONS and GLOBAL CHANGE Why? Where Are We? What Next? EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND GLOBAL CHANGE Why? Where Are We? What Next? A Report of CSIS Space Initiatives 1800 K Street NW | Washington, DC 20006 AUTHORS Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 Lyn Wigbels E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org G. Ryan Faith Vincent Sabathier July 2008 ISBN 978-0-89206-541-7 CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & Ë|xHSKITCy065417zv*:+:!:+:! CSIS INTERNATIONAL STUDIES EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND GLOBAL CHANGE Why? Where Are We? What Next? A Report of CSIS Space Initiatives AUTHORS Lyn Wigbels G. Ryan Faith Vincent Sabathier July 2008 About CSIS In an era of ever-changing global opportunities and challenges, the Center for Strategic and Inter- national Studies (CSIS) provides strategic insights and practical policy solutions to decisionmak- ers. CSIS conducts research and analysis and develops policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke at the height of the Cold War, CSIS was dedicated to the simple but urgent goal of finding ways for America to survive as a nation and prosper as a people. Since 1962, CSIS has grown to become one of the world’s preeminent public policy institutions. Today, CSIS is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. More than 220 full-time staff and a large network of affiliated scholars focus their expertise on defense and security; on the world’s regions and the unique challenges inherent to them; and on the issues that know no boundary in an increasingly connected world. Former U.S. senator Sam Nunn became chairman of the CSIS Board of Trustees in 1999, and John J. Hamre has led CSIS as its president and chief executive officer since 2000. CSIS does not take specific policy positions; accordingly, all views expressed in this publica- tion should be understood to be solely those of the author(s). Photo credits: NASA/WilliamAnders —Apollo 8, cover: ©iStockphoto.com/George Jurasek, p. v; ©iStockphoto.com/Federico Montemurro, p. vi; NASA GSFC Scientific Visualization Studio, p. vii; Department of Defense/Staff Sgt. Oscar Sanchez, Iowa National Guard, p. xiii; Adam Sparkes, p. xiv; Department of Defense/Lance Cpl. Willard J. Lathrop, USMC, p. 3; Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, The University of Montana, p. 4; ©iStockphoto.com/Zoran Simin, p. 5; NASA, p. 6; NASA/Lawrence Ong, p. 6; David S. Roberts, p. 7; ©iStockphoto.com/Peter Cosgrove, p. 8; NASA GSFC/Craig Mayhew and Robert Simmon, p. 9; Erik Charlto, p. 17; NOAA, p. 18; NASA GSFC, p. 27; ©iStockphoto.com/ Volker Kreinacke, p. 28. © 2008 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data CIP information available on request. ISBN 978-0-89206-541-7 The CSIS Press Center for Strategic and International Studies 1800 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006 Tel: (202) 775-3119 Fax: (202) 775-3199 Web: www.csis.org 2 contents Preface iv Executive Summary vii 1. What Is the Value of Earth Observations? 1 Background Findings Why Is the Private Sector Relying More on Earth Observations? What Is the Role of Earth Observations in Maintaining National and International Security? What Is the Role of Earth Observations in Providing Global Public Goods? 2. Where Are Earth Observations Today? 19 Who in the U.S. Government Is Responsible for Earth Observations? What Challenges Face Earth Observations? How Will We Plan and Pay for Earth Observations? How Will the Public and Private Sectors Work Together? 3. What Happens Next in Earth Observations? 29 Value of Earth Observations and U.S. Challenges and Opportunities International Challenges and Opportunities Private-Sector Challenges and Opportunities Appendix A. Working Group Members and Contributors 32 Appendix B. Current and Planned Earth Observation Satellites 34 | iii preface Is it possible to predict or alleviate the impacts of natural and manmade disasters? From the recent earthquake in China to the cyclone in Myanmar to the rapid changes in our climate to the ongoing violence in Darfur, environmental and national security events are occurring around the globe. Can we learn to adapt to and mitigate the water shortages and droughts that, combined with crop failures and exacerbated by soaring energy prices and a growing demand for biofuels, have led to an unprecedented global food crisis? Will we be able to understand and take actions to minimize the impact of changing climate and associated weather events on the health of human popula- tions—from addressing rising sea levels to the accelerated spread of disease? Will we be able to balance the need for a wider array of alternative energy sources with respect to surging energy prices, simultaneously managing the implementation of carbon emission agreements including carbon cap and trade agreements? These questions, and many others, demonstrate the complex management challenges present- ed by global change.1 In order for decisionmakers to address these management challenges, they must have reliable, continuous long-term data about our planet and environment. Earth observa- tions—including sensors in space, on land, in the air, and at sea, as well as associated data man- agement and dissemination systems, Earth system models, and decision support tools—provide the infrastructure to deliver the data needed to understand ongoing global changes. In the half century since the dawn of the space age, space-based technologies from communications satel- lites to the global position system (GPS)—which underpin the success of globalization in recent decades—have been instrumental in knitting our civilization more closely together. Similarly, we have started to rely on Earth observations as another global public good. Earth observations are critical in a number of areas including dramatic applications in managing the effect of disasters, monitoring global agricultural productivity, assessing natural conditions including the state of the Earth’s fresh water supplies, and monitoring the indirect effects of global energy policies on Earth’s climate. These are all part of the vast effort involved in understanding and managing the 20 per- cent to 80 percent of the U.S. economy (representing $2.75 trillion to $11 trillion in 2007) sensitive to weather in the short term, let alone the evolving risk profile associated with longer-term global change. We have successfully developed and integrated space-based communications and navigation capabilities to bring us closer together. While we have made great strides in developing and using Earth observation capabilities, many challenges remain to provide equivalent accomplishments 1. For the purposes of this report, we use the phrase “global change” to encompass the entire range of environment-related change phenomena regardless of time scale—from climate change to changes in avail- able natural resources to severe weather--that can be observed, monitored, or understood with the aid of Earth observation systems. Further, when terms such as predict, prevent, mitigate (or other similar words) are used, they are meant generally to cover the full range of activities that one performs based on actionable Earth observation data. iv | in the operational and sustained use of Earth observations for global security. While we have started to use Earth observations in predicting and responding to disasters, such as the Indonesian tsunami or Hurricane Katrina, we are far from secure in having an operational ability to systemati- cally monitor, predict, mitigate, or understand in order to take the actions necessary to prevent the challenges caused by the ever-increasing pace of global change. If we are to understand and plan intelligently for global change, we must take every opportunity to build on our past successes and redress our existing shortcomings. Today, there are a number of steps the United States must undertake to deliver on the potential of Earth observations. First, the United States has the opportunity to demonstrate strong leader- ship within the U.S. Earth observation community through coherent, integrated planning, budget- ing, and management of an Earth observation system providing long-term, continuous data acqui- sition. Second, the United States must lead the world toward effective international cooperation on Earth observations and, consequently, global change. Like any other kind of strong international leadership, leadership in Earth observations enhances our national foreign policy capabilities from providing data to manage global resources to economic security enabled by Earth observation capacity building. Third, the United States must ensure that Earth observations meet the needs of all users and that the public and private sectors reinforce—not inhibit—each other to enable us to take advantage of the ingenuity and innovation that the private sector can offer. Rather than learning to adapt to natural and manmade disasters, the changing climate, the global food crisis, and our growing appetite for energy, dealing only with the consequences after the fact, we need to start focusing our efforts on the Earth observation systems that will better connect humanity and its home, allowing us to prevent, predict, and mitigate the increasingly dramatic impacts of global change on a routine basis. lyn wigbels, g. ryan faith, and vincent sabathier | v Bank damaged in 2005 by Hurricane Wilma—the most intense hurricane recorded in the Atlantic basin. vi | earth observations and global change executive summary The Value of Earth Observations
Recommended publications
  • Istanbul Technical University Institute of Science And
    İSTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY « INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DESIGN STUDY OF A COMMUNICATION SUBSYSTEM AND GROUND STATION FOR ITU-pSAT II M.Sc. Thesis by Melih FİDANOĞLU Department : Institue of Science and Technology Programme : Defence Technologies JANUARY 2011 İSTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY « INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DESIGN STUDY OF A COMMUNICATION SUBSYSTEM AND GROUND STATION FOR ITU-pSAT II M.Sc. Thesis by Melih FİDANOĞLU (514071013) Date of submission : 20 December 2010 Date of defence examination: 24 January 2011 Supervisor (Chairman) : Assoc. Prof. Dr. Gökhan İNALHAN (ITU) Members of the Examining Committee : Prof. Dr. İbrahim ÖZKOL (ITU) Prof. Dr. Metin Orhan KAYA (ITU) JANUARY 2011 İSTANBUL TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ « FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ ITU-pSAT II İÇİN İLETİŞİM ALTSİSTEMİ VE YER İSTASYONU TASARIM ÇALIŞMASI YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ Melih FİDANOĞLU (514071013) Tezin Enstitüye Verildiği Tarih : 20 Aralık 2010 Tezin Savunulduğu Tarih : 24 Ocak 2011 Tez Danışmanı : Doç. Dr. Gökhan İnalhan (İTÜ) Diğer Jüri Üyeleri : Prof. Dr. İbrahim Özkol (İTÜ) Prof. Dr. Metin Orhan Kaya (İTÜ) OCAK 2011 FOREWORD First of all, I would like to thank my advisor, Gökhan İnalhan for the opportunity to work in the fantastic setup of Control and Avionics Laboratory and to work with the research team here. I would like to thank ITU-pSAT II project team including Emre Koyuncu, Melahat Cihan, Elgiz Başkaya and Soner Işıksal for being my project teammates. Also, my sincere thanks goes to Control and Avionics Lab's fellow labmates, including, but not limited to, Serdar Ateş, Oktay Arslan and Nazım Kemal Üre. A special thanks goes to TÜBİTAK. Without their contributions, this project would not be possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Global-Outlook-Report-November
    GLOBAL OUTLOOK 2014: SPATIAL INFORMATION INDUSTRY Peter Woodgate, Isabel Coppa and Nicola Hart August 2014 141 ACCESS AND AVAILABILITY The report is available in PDF format at http://www.crcsi.com.au We welcome your comments regarding the readability and usefulness of this report. To provide feedback, please contact us at [email protected] CITING THIS REPORT Woodgate, P. W., Coppa, I. and Hart, N. (2014), ‘Global Outlook 2014: Spatial Information Industry’. Published by the Australia and New Zealand Cooperative Research Centre for Spatial Information. ISBN (online) 978-0-646-93034-3 COPYRIGHT All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence, save for content supplied by third parties, and logos. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided you attribute the work. The full licence terms are available from creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/ legalcode. A summary of the licence terms is available from creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en. DISCLAIMER While every effort has been made to ensure its accuracy, the CRCSI does not offer any express or implied warranties or representations as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. The CRCSI and its employees and agents accept no liability in negligence for the information (or the use of such information) provided in this report. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Wendy Jackson. 2ii INDEX OF TABLES Table 1: Global Megatrends According to Ernst & Young and ..................................... 3 PriceWaterhouseCoopers Table 2: Australian Satellites, Accurate at 31 January, 2014 .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interface Lançador/Cubesat Para O Projeto Do Nanosatc-Br
    INTERFACE LANÇADOR/CUBESAT PARA O PROJETO DO NANOSATC-BR RELATÓRIO FINAL DE PROJETO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA PIBIC/INPE - CNPq/MCT PROCESSO Nº: 103111/2009-3 Eduardo Escobar Bürger – Bolsista PIBIC/INPE – CNPq/MCT Laboratório de Mecânica Fina, Mecatrônica e Antenas LAMEC/CRS/INPE – MCT Centro Regional Sul de Pesquisas Espaciais CRS/INPE – MCT E-mail: [email protected] Dr. Otavio Santos Cupertino Durão – Orientador Coordenação de Planejamento Estratégico e Avaliação CPA/DIR/INPE – MCT Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais INPE - MCT E-mail: [email protected] Santa Maria, junho de 2009 Centro Regional Sul de Pesquisas Espaciais – CRS/INPE – MCT Relatório Final de Atividades RELATÓRIO FINAL DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DO PROGRAMA: PIBIC/INPE – CNPq/MCT PROJETO INTERFACE LANÇADOR/CUBESAT PARA O PROJETO DO NANOSATC-BR PROCESSO N°: 103111/2009-3 Relatório elaborado por: Eduardo Escobar Bürger – Bolsista PIBIC/INPE – CNPq/MCT E-mail: [email protected] Dr. Otavio Santos Cupertino Durão – Orientador Coordenação de Planejamento Estratégico e Avaliação CPA/DIR/INPE – MCT E-mail: [email protected] Dr. Nelson Jorge Schuch – Co-Orientador Centro Regional Sul de Pesquisas Espaciais CRS/INPE – MCT E-mail: [email protected] Centro Regional Sul de Pesquisas Espaciais – CRS/INPE – MCT Relatório Final de Atividades DADOS DE IDENTIFICAÇÃO Projeto: INTERFACE LANÇADOR/CUBESAT PARA O PROJETO DO NANOSATC-BR Processo CNPq: Nº 103111/2009-3. Bolsista: Eduardo Escobar Bürger Curso de Engenharia Mecânica - Centro de Tecnologia Universidade Federal de Santa Maria – UFSM Orientador: Dr. Otávio Santos Cupertino Durão Coordenação de Planejamento Estratégico e Avaliação – CPA/DIR/INPE – MCT Co-Orientador: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • MASTER's THESIS Nanosat / Cubesat Constellation Concepts
    2009:092 MASTER'S THESIS Nanosat / Cubesat constellation concepts Alexandru Catalin Munteanu Luleå University of Technology Master Thesis, Continuation Courses Space Science and Technology Department of Space Science, Kiruna 2009:092 - ISSN: 1653-0187 - ISRN: LTU-PB-EX--09/092--SE CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY ALEXANDRU CATALIN MUNTEANU NANOSAT / CUBESAT CONSTELLATION CONCEPTS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING Astronautics and Space Engineering MSc. THESIS Academic year: 2008 – 2009 Supervisor: Dr. Stephen Hobbs June 2009 CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING Astronautics and Space Engineering MSc THESIS Academic Year 2008 – 2009 ALEXANDRU CATALIN MUNTEANU Nanosat / Cubesat Constellation Concepts Supervisor: Dr. Stephen Hobbs June 2009 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science © Cranfield University 2009. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owner. Alexandru Munteanu ABSTRACT This thesis was produced at Cranfield University, with support from EADS Astrium who introduced the base requirements for the study. The subject to be researched was the possibility of using Cubesats for producing viable Earth Observation missions when they would be used in some constellation configuration. The project involved surveying nanosat / Cubesat constellation markets and concepts (e.g. real-time data) for Earth Observation, using new / enabling technologies (i.e. deployable membranes, quad junction cells, miniature instruments). The project also contributes to the Cubesat projects by providing a roadmap of possible future missions enabled by advanced Cubesats. The study concluded by selecting a present day possible mission which could be developed by using COTS components and space-proved instruments and some missions which could be developed in the near future using other new technologies yet to be made available for space applications.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 - FY-3A (FY-3A Polar-Orbiting Meteorological Satellite) NRSCC
    Satellite Mission Index (alphabetically ordered) ACRIMSAT (Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor) NASA........................................................................................................................................................15 ADM-Aeolus (Atmospheric Dynamics Mission (Earth Explorer Core Mission)) ESA .............................................................................................................................15 ALOS (Advanced Land Observing Satellite) JAXA ...............................................................................................................................................................................15 Aqua (Aqua (formerly EOS PM-1)) NASA.............................................................................................................................................................................................15 Aura (Aura (formerly EOS Chemistry)) NASA.......................................................................................................................................................................................16 Baumanets ROSKOSMOS ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................16 BelKA ROSKOSMOS ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Second Quarter 2006 Quarterly Launch Report 1
    Commercial Space Transportation Quarterly Launch Report 2nd Quarter 2006 Featuring Launch results from the 1st Quarter 2006 and Forecasts for the 2nd and 3rd Quarters 2006. Quarterly Report Topic: Commercial Space and Launch Insurance: Current Market and Future Outlook HQ-020906.INDD Second Quarter 2006 Quarterly Launch Report 1 Introduction The Second Quarter 2006 Quarterly Launch Report features launch results from the first quarter of 2006 (January-March 2006) and forecasts for the second quarter of 2006 (April-June 2006) and the third quarter of 2006 (July-September 2006). This report contains information on worldwide commercial, civil, and military orbital and commercial suborbital space launch events. Projected launches have been identified from open sources, including industry references, company manifests, periodicals, and government sources. Projected launches are subject to change. This report highlights commercial launch activities, classifying commercial launches as one or both of the following: • Internationally-competed launch events (i.e., launch opportunities considered available in principle to competitors in the international launch services market) • Any launches licensed by the Office of Commercial Space Transportation of the Federal Aviation Administration under 49 United States Code Subtitle IX, Chapter 701 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act) Contents First Quarter 2006 Highlights . .2 Vehicle Use . .3 Commercial Launch Events by Country . .4 Commercial vs. Non-commercial Launch Events . .4 Orbital vs. Suborbital Launch Events . .5 Launch Successes vs. Failures . .5 Payload Use . .6 Payload Mass Class . .6 Commercial Launch Trends . .7 Commercial Launch History . .8 Special Report: Commercial Space and Launch Insurance: Current Market and Future Outlook . .SR-1 Appendix A: First Quarter 2006 Orbital and Suborbital Launch Events .
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in Space 2006
    International Astronautical Federation Committee on Space Research International Institute of Space Law 8-10 rue Mario Nikis c/o CNES, 2 place Maurice Quentin 8-10 rue Mario Nikis UNITED NATIONS 75735 Paris, Cedex 15, France 75039 Paris, Cedex 01, France 75735 Paris, Cedex 15, France Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel: +33 1 44 76 75 10 Fax: +33 1 44 76 74 37 Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS URL: http://www.iafastro.com URL: http://www.cosparhq.cnes.fr URL: http://www.iafastro-iisl.com Highlights in Space 2006 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Highlights in Space 2006 in Space Highlights The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (OOSA) is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations publication United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs ISBN: 978-92-1-101147-0 Sales No. E.07.I.9 P.O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950, Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 ST/SPACE/30 E-mail: [email protected] UNITED NATIONS V.06-59591—January 2007—1,150 Website: www.unoosa.org 06-59591_pi-pii_smcf.qxp 23/01/2007 16:02 Page 1 OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2006 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2007 06-59591_pi-pii_smcf.qxp 23/01/2007 16:02 Page 2 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No.: E.07.I.9 ISBN 978-92-1-101147-0 ST/SPACE/34 This document has not been formally edited.
    [Show full text]
  • MASTER THESIS Mission and Thermal Analysis of the UPC Cubesat
    MASTER THESIS Mission and Thermal Analysis of the UPC Cubesat Pol Sintes Arroyo SUPERVISED BY Josep J. Masdemont Soler Universitat Politecnica` de Catalunya Master in Aerospace Science and Technology 14 de desembre de 2009 Mission and Thermal Analysis of the UPC Cubesat BY Pol Sintes Arroyo DIPLOMA THESIS FOR DEGREE Master in Aerospace Science and Technology AT Universitat Politecnica` de Catalunya SUPERVISED BY: Josep J. Masdemont Soler Matematica` Aplicada I ABSTRACT The Project is envisioned as a mission control analysis and a thermal control analysis of the Cubesat that is planning to launch the UPC (Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya). A Cubesat is a 10x10x10 cm cubic satellite that weights no more than 1 kg and that is currently used in many countries and educational institutions as an easy access to space. The primary work to do would be the analysis of the orbit the satellite would perform. In this way, the STK (Satellite Tool Kit) software would provide the mechanism to perform this analysis. Starting with the known values of the project, simulations have been carried out in order to obtain the trajectory the satellite will would perform. Additionally, perturbations in the orbit, comparatives with other models and simulations with different parameters would be studied. All this practical work is completed with a theoretical explanation of what are the models used by the software, what are the parameters used and why we use this ones and no other ones. The second part of the project presents the thermal analysis of the satellite. In this section, draft calculations of the thermal balance of the satellite are presented along with simula- tions with the SEET (Space Environment and Effects Tool) module of the STK.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Satellite Missions (By Year and Sponsoring Agency)
    List of satellite missions (by year and sponsoring agency) Launch EO Satellite Mission Launch EO Satellite Mission Launch EO Satellite Mission Year (and sponsoring agency) Year (and sponsoring agency) Year (and sponsoring agency) 1967 Diademe 1&2 (CNES) 2003 ICESat (NASA) 2007 Meteor-M No2 SORCE (NASA) (ROSHYDROMET / ROSKOSMOS) 1975 STARLETTE (CNES) INSAT-3A (ISRO) OCEANSAT-2 (ISRO) 1976 LAGEOS-1 (NASA) SCISAT-1 (CSA) RapidEye (DLR) UK-DMC (BNSC) SMOS (ESA) 1984 Landsat-5 (USGS) RESOURCESAT-1 (ISRO) GOES-O (NOAA) ERBS (NASA) DMSP F-16 (NOAA) HJ-1C (CAST) 1990 SPOT-2 (CNES) CBERS-2 (CAST / INPE) THEOS (GISTDA) OCO (NASA) 1991 METEOSAT-5 (EUMETSAT) 2004 DEMETER (CNES) SAOCOM 1A (CONAE) NOAA-12 (NOAA) Aura (NASA) ADM-Aeolus (ESA) UARS (NASA) FY-2C (NRSCC) DMSP F-18 (NOAA) PARASOL (CNES) 1992 Topex-Poseidon (NASA / CNES) SAC-F (CONAE) SICH-1M (NSAU / ROSKOSMOS) LAGEOS-2 (NASA / ASI) Glory (NASA) 2005 Meteor-M No1 SSR-1 (INPE) 1993 SCD-1 (INPE) (ROSHYDROMET / ROSKOSMOS) STELLA (CNES) 2008 DSCOVR (NASA) Vulkan-Kompas-2 (ROSKOSMOS) ESA Future Missions (ESA) 1993 METEOSAT-6 (EUMETSAT) MTSAT-1R (JMA) PICARD (CNES) NOAA-N (NOAA) 1994 NOAA-14 (NOAA) GOSAT (JAXA) GOES-N (NOAA) METEOSAT-10 (EUMETSAT) 1995 GMS-5 (JAXA / JMA) CARTOSAT-1 (ISRO) Pleiades 1 (CNES) ERS-2 (ESA) CRYOSAT (ESA) SAC-D/Aquarius (CONAE / NASA) GOES-9 (NOAA) Monitor-E (ROSKOSMOS) SAOCOM 1B (CONAE) RADARSAT-1 (CSA) CALIPSO (NASA / CNES) GOES-P (NOAA) CloudSat (NASA) 1997 DMSP F-13 (NOAA) CBERS-3 (CAST / INPE) DMSP F-17 (NOAA) GOES-10 (NOAA) NOAA-N' (NOAA) TopSat (BNSC) METEOSAT-7
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Space Programs: 1976-80 (With Supplementary Data Through 1983)
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 257 672 SE 045 768 TITLE Soviet Space Programs: 1976-80 (WithSupplementary Data through 1983). Manned Space Programsand Spar- L' Sciences. Part 2. Prepared at the Requesto! He Bob Packwood, Chairman, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United StatesSenate, Ninety-Eighth Congress, Second Session. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. REPORT NO Senate-Prt-98-235-PART-2 PUB DATE Oct 84 NOTE 314p. AVAILABLE FROM Superintendent of Documents, U.S. GovernmentPrinting Office, Washington, DC 20402. PUB TYPE Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (090) -- Reports - Research/Technical (143) EMS PRICE MFO1 /1DC13 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Aerospace Technology; *BiologicalSciences; Gravity (Physics); Satellites (Aerospace); *Scientific Research; *Space Exploration; *SpaceSciences; Training IDENTIFIERS Congress 98th; *USSR ABSTRACT This report, the second of a three-part studyof Soviet space programs, examinestheir manned space programs and reviews their quest for a permanentlymanned presence in space. Also included is information concerning thephysiologici.1 and psychological findings related to theextended duration of Soviet manned flights and an executive summary.Chapter 1 is an overview of the manned programs of both theSoviet Union and the United States (1957-83). Chapter 2 highlightssignificant activities in Soviet manned spaceflight from 1981 to 1983.Chapter 3 provides detailed information on manned space flight programs,considering the early years of Soviet mannedspaceflight, first generation space flights (Salyut 1-5), Salyut 6, mannedmissions to Salyut 6 (1977-80), and other areas. Chapter 4 providesadditional information on the Soviet space life sciences,examining cosmonaut selection and training, space medicine,life support, negative and positivegravitational forces, biological research in space,and other areas.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 SPACESECURITY.ORG SPACE SECURITY 2007 SPACESECURITY.ORG Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publications Data
    SPACE SECURITY 2007 SPACESECURITY.ORG SPACE SECURITY 2007 SPACESECURITY.ORG Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publications Data Space Security 2007 ISBN: 978-1-895722-58-1 © 2007 SPACESECURITY.ORG Design and layout by Graphics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Cover image: Orbital Sciences Corporation. Artists’ illustration of six microsatellites launched 14 April 2006 to form COSMIC, the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate, a joint project between the United States and Taiwan. Printed in Canada First published August 2007 Please direct inquiries to: Project Ploughshares 57 Erb Street West Waterlo, Ontario Canada N2L 6C2 Telephone: 519-888-6541 Fax: 519-888-0018 Email: [email protected] Governance Group Jessica West Managing Editor, Project Ploughshares Cynda Collins Arsenault Secure World Foundation Amb. Thomas Graham Jr. Cypress Fund for Peace and Security Dr. Wade Huntley Simons Centre for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Research University of British Columbia Dr. Ram Jakhu Institute of Air and Space Law McGill University Dr. William Marshall Space Policy Institute George Washington University and NASA-Ames Research Centre Andrew Shore Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada John Siebert Project Ploughshares Advisory Board Amb. Thomas Graham Jr. (Chairman of the Board), Cypress Fund for Peace and Security Philip Coyle III Center for Defense Information Richard DalBello Intelsat-General Corporation Air Marshall Lord Garden House of Lords, UK Theresa
    [Show full text]
  • 4Q2006 Quarterly Report
    Commercial Space Transportation Quarterly Launch Report 4th Quarter 2006 Featuring Launch Results from the 3rd Quarter 2006 and Forecasts for the 4th Quarter 2006 and 1st Quarter 2007 Special Report: Waivers of Liability: Are They Enough for Permittees and Licensees? HQ-038806.indd Fourth Quarter 2006 Quarterly Launch Report 1 Introduction The Fourth Quarter 2006 Quarterly Launch Report features launch results from the third quarter of 2006 (July-September 2006) and forecasts for the fourth quarter of 2006 (October-December 2006) and the first quarter of 2007 (January-March 2007). This report contains information on worldwide commercial, civil, and military orbital and commercial suborbital space launch events. Projected launches have been identified from open sources, including industry references, company manifests, periodicals, and government sources. Projected launches are subject to change. This report highlights commercial launch activities, classifying commercial launches as one or both of the following: • Internationally-competed launch events (i.e., launch opportunities considered available in principle to competitors in the international launch services market) • Any launches licensed by the Office of Commercial Space Transportation of the Federal Aviation Administration under 49 United States Code Subtitle IX, Chapter 701 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act) Contents Third Quarter 2006 Highlights . .2 Vehicle Use . .3 Commercial Launch Events by Country . .4 Commercial vs. Non-commercial Launch Events . .4 Orbital vs. Suborbital Launch Events . .5 Launch Successes vs. Failures . .5 Payload Use . .6 Payload Mass Class . .6 Commercial Launch Trends . .7 Commercial Launch History . .8 Special Report: Waivers of Liability: Are They Enough for Permittees and Licensees? . .SR-1 Appendix A: Third Quarter 2006 Orbital and Suborbital Launch Events .
    [Show full text]