1956 Suez Campaign

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

1956 Suez Campaign In the early 1950s, Egypt violated the terms of the Egyptian-Israeli armistice agreement and blocked Israeli ships from passing through the Suez Canal, a major international waterway. It also began to block traffic through the Straits of Tiran, a narrow passage of water linking the Israeli port of Eilat to the Red Sea. This action effectively cut off the port of Eilat -- Israel's sole outlet to the Red Sea and Indian Ocean. Closure of the Suez Canal and the Tiran Straits damaged Israel's trade with Asia, for it meant that foreign ships carrying goods bound for Israel and Israeli ships carrying goods bound for the Far East had to travel a long and costly circuitous route to the Atlantic and Israel's Mediterranean ports. At the same time, Palestinian Arab fedayeen launched cross-border infiltrations and attacks on Israeli civilian centers and military outposts from Egypt, Jordan and Syria. Arab infiltration and Israeli retaliation became a regular pattern of Arab-Israeli relations. Israel hoped that its harsh reprisals would compel Arab governments to restrain infiltrators into Israel. In 1955 alone, 260 Israeli citizens were killed or wounded by fedayeen. In July 1956, Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal, threatening British and French interests in oil supplies and western trade. Their interests converging, Israel, Britain and France planned an attack on Egypt, with the former seeking free navigation through international waters and an end to terrorist attacks and the latter two hoping to seize control of the Suez Canal. On October 29, 1956, Israel began its assault on Egyptian military positions, capturing the whole of the Gaza Strip and the Sinai Peninsula. On October 31, 1 / 2 France and Britain joined the fray and hostilities ended on November 5. The U.S. was caught completely by surprise and voiced strong opposition to the joint attack. The U.S. pressured Israel to withdraw from Egyptian territory. United Nations forces were stationed along the Egyptian-Israeli border to prevent an Egyptian blockade and deter cross-border infiltrations. Israel declared that if Egyptian forces would again blockade the entrance to the Gulf of Aqaba, it would consider this a casus belli. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 2 / 2.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Singapore, July 2006
Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Singapore, July 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: SINGAPORE July 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Singapore (English-language name). Also, in other official languages: Republik Singapura (Malay), Xinjiapo Gongheguo― 新加坡共和国 (Chinese), and Cingkappãr Kudiyarasu (Tamil) சி க யரச. Short Form: Singapore. Click to Enlarge Image Term for Citizen(s): Singaporean(s). Capital: Singapore. Major Cities: Singapore is a city-state. The city of Singapore is located on the south-central coast of the island of Singapore, but urbanization has taken over most of the territory of the island. Date of Independence: August 31, 1963, from Britain; August 9, 1965, from the Federation of Malaysia. National Public Holidays: New Year’s Day (January 1); Lunar New Year (movable date in January or February); Hari Raya Haji (Feast of the Sacrifice, movable date in February); Good Friday (movable date in March or April); Labour Day (May 1); Vesak Day (June 2); National Day or Independence Day (August 9); Deepavali (movable date in November); Hari Raya Puasa (end of Ramadan, movable date according to the Islamic lunar calendar); and Christmas (December 25). Flag: Two equal horizontal bands of red (top) and white; a vertical white crescent (closed portion toward the hoist side), partially enclosing five white-point stars arranged in a circle, positioned near the hoist side of the red band. The red band symbolizes universal brotherhood and the equality of men; the white band, purity and virtue. The crescent moon represents Click to Enlarge Image a young nation on the rise, while the five stars stand for the ideals of democracy, peace, progress, justice, and equality.
[Show full text]
How Hitler and Stalin Made Modern Poland
The Wall Street Journal August 1, 2019 How Hitler and Stalin Made Modern Poland The neglected history of the Warsaw uprising helps explain the country’s nationalist politics today. by Sean McMeekin Members of the Polish resistance fight the Nazis in Warsaw, 1944. Photo: Photo 12/Universal Images Group via Getty Images Warsaw Thursday marks the 75th anniversary of the heroic yet doomed Warsaw Uprising against German occupation forces in Poland. Every Aug. 1 at 5 p.m., Poles mark the bitter occasion with a moment of silence for the fallen. Alarm sirens wail in a would-be call to arms that captures the defiant spirit of this proud, pugnacious nation. Warsaw’s stupendous Uprising Museum, one of the city’s few tourist attractions, illustrates the painful side of this defiance. For the battle of 1944 left behind almost nothing of old Warsaw for visitors to admire. The martyrs of the Polish Home Army lost not only their lives but also the city they loved. The fate of Warsaw—reduced to rubble by the vengeful cruelty of one dictator, Hitler, in unspoken connivance with his enemy doppelgänger, Stalin—epitomizes the catastrophe of World War II better than any other single event. Why, then, is this shattering episode in European history almost forgotten in the West? Perhaps because the battle for Warsaw does not have a happy ending. Germany’s eventual defeat did not mark the liberation of Poles but the beginning of another brutal occupation by the Communists. This unsettles the narrative of World War II as a “good war” and looms large over Polish and European politics to this day.
[Show full text]
Refugee Status Appeals Authority New Zealand
REFUGEE STATUS APPEALS AUTHORITY NEW ZEALAND REFUGEE APPEAL NO 76505 AT AUCKLAND Before: B L Burson (Chairperson) S A Aitchison (Member) Counsel for the Appellant: D Mansouri-Rad Appearing for the Department of Labour: No Appearance Date of Hearing: 3 & 4 May 2010 Date of Decision: 14 June 2010 DECISION [1] This is an appeal against the decision of a refugee status officer of the Refugee Status Branch (RSB) of the Department of Labour (DOL) declining refugee status to the appellant, a national of Iraq. INTRODUCTION [2] The appellant claims to have a well-founded fear of being persecuted in Iraq on account of his former Ba’ath Party membership in the rank of Naseer Mutakadim, and due to his father’s position as Branch Member of the al-Amed Organisation for the Ba’ath Party in City A. He fears persecution at the hands of members of the Mahdi Army – a Shi’a militia group in Iraq, the police who collaborate with them, and the Iraqi Government that is infiltrated by militias. [3] The principal issues to be determined in this appeal are the well- foundedness of the appellant’s fears and whether he can genuinely access meaningful domestic protection. 2 THE APPELLANT’S CASE [4] What follows is a summary of the appellant’s evidence in support of his claim. It will be assessed later in this decision. Background [5] The appellant is a single man in his early-30s. He was born in Suburb A in City A. He is one of three children, the youngest of two boys.
[Show full text]
International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran-Iraq War
Mercer Law Review Volume 43 Number 2 Lead Articles I - The Legal Article 1 Implications of a Nation at War 3-1992 International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran-Iraq War Francis A. Boyle Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr Part of the International Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Boyle, Francis A. (1992) "International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran- Iraq War," Mercer Law Review: Vol. 43 : No. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr/vol43/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Mercer Law School Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mercer Law Review by an authorized editor of Mercer Law School Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LEAD ARTICLES International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran-Iraq War by Francis A. Boyle* Prescript This Article was written in 1986 and submitted to the University of New Orleans Symposium on Neutrality. The Article reflects the author's analysis regarding the United States military intervensionism into the Middle East with a special focus on the Persian Gulf region. The author analyzes the United States' policies to divide-and-conquer the Arab oil * Professor of International Law, University of Illinois College of Law, Champaign, Illi- nois. University of Chicago (A.B., 1971); Harvard Law School (J.D., magna cum laude, 1976); Harvard University (A.M., 1978 and Ph.D.
[Show full text]
Fighting for the King and the Gods
FIGHTING FOR THE KING AND THE GODS Press SBL RESOURCES FOR BIBLICAL STUDY Editor Marvin A. Sweeney, Old Testament/Hebrew Bible Number 88 Press SBL FIGHTING FOR THE KING AND THE GODS A Survey of Warfare in the Ancient Near East Charlie Trimm Press SBL Atlanta Copyright © 2017 by Charlie Trimm All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permit- ted by the 1976 Copyright Act or in writing from the publisher. Requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the Rights and Permissions Office, SBL Press, 825 Hous- ton Mill Road, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Trimm, Charlie, 1977– author. Title: Fighting for the king and the gods : a survey of warfare in the ancient Near East / by Charlie Trimm. Description: Atlanta : SBL Press, 2017. | Series: Resources for biblical study ; number 88 | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers:LCCN 2017021412 (print) | LCCN 2017026895 (ebook) | ISBN 9780884142379 (ebook) | ISBN 9781628371840 (pbk. : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780884142386 (hardcover : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Military art and science—History—To 500. | Military art and science— Middle East—History. | Iraq—History—To 634. Classification: LCC U31 (ebook) | LCC U31 .T75 2017 (print) | DDC 355.0209394—dc23 LC record available at hhps://lccn.loc.gov/2017021412 Press Printed on acid-free paper. SBL In memory of my father Press SBL Press SBL Contents Abbreviations and Sigla ...................................................................................ix List of Figures ................................................................................................xxiv 1.
[Show full text]
Port of Eilat Information, Operational
PORT OF EILAT INFORMATION, OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES AND REGULATIONS HANDBOOK EUROPE ASIA PIPELINE CO. OPERATIONS DIVISION JANUARY 2021 CONTENTS FORWARD 3 Inert gas systems 9 INTRODUCTION 4 Ballast water 9 Eilat – General Information 5 Engine 9 Available Facilities and Services 5 Berth Facilities 10 Shore Leave and Transportation 5 No. 1 Jetty 10 Communications 5 No. 2 Jetty 10 Medical Facilities 5 Mooring Lines -Requirements 10 Provisions and Stores 5 Discharging/Loading Arms 10 Fresh Water 5 Manifold Requirement 11 Bunkers 6 Safety Instructions 11 Repairs 6 Cellular Phones 12 Mooring Restrictions 6 Communication 12 Navigational and Meteorological 6 Ship to Shore Radio 13 Information Communication Location of Terminal 6 Cargo Operation Planning 13 Navigational Aids and Landmarks 6 Loading 13 Anchorage 7 Discharging 14 Chart and Pilot Books 7 Pollution Prevention 14 Tide and Currents 7 Oil Spill 14 Temperatures 7 Garbage, Waste Paper and 14 Cartons Winds 7 Accommodation 14 Rain 8 Fogs and Sand Storms 8 Sea Condition 8 Local Time 8 Pilotage 8 Pilotage (general) 8 Pilot Ladder Requirements 8 Berthing Information 8 Tugs and Boats 8 Loading Master 9 Arms Connections 9 Draft 9 FORWARD The purpose of this handbook is to acquaint Masters of tankers, ship owners and charterers with the regulations, general information, and services available to tankers and other vessels calling at the Eilat Oil Terminal. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein. However, it does not replace any information contained in other official publications concerning the Port and the surrounding area. While the information contained is believed to be correct at the time of printing, Europe Asia Pipeline Company Ltd., its delegates and representatives assume no responsibility for any consequences resulting from errors contained therein, or from the use of this information for any purpose whatsoever.
[Show full text]
Fedayeen Action and Arab Strategy
ADELPHI PAPER NO. 53 Y. Karkabi is a retired senior officer of the Israel Defence Forces who now teaches at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem. He has been directly concerned with the Arab-Israel conflict, in the capacity of Chief of Military Intelligence from 1955 to 1959; this is now his field ofacademic research. In 1968 he was a Senior Research Associate at the Institute for Strategic Studies for four months. This paper was completed in the autumn of 1968. CONTENTS Additional copies of this paper may be ordered from the Institute at the cost of 5s (75c) each, post free. r. Introduction page I 2. Preparing for War 2 3. Fatah's Doctrine 6 4. Debate and Action 17 5. Fedayeenafter the Six-day War 25 6. Guerrilla Warfare and the Nc\v Arab Strategy 3' 7. Living with the Conflict 33 Notes 38 Preferences .. 42 . Note: The numbers in the text refer to the notes to be found on p. 38 and following. They are grouped within chapters. All references to The Institute for Strategic Studies is a non-governmental research centre Arab sources are to be found under references on p. 43, again concerned with the study ofthe problems of war, conjlict and arms control grouped within chapters. on an international basis. The purpose ofthe Adclphi Paper scries is togive hospitality to a wide range of analytical work; the papers which form the series are not intended to express the views or the policyof the Institute itself which is not the advocate of any nationalposition or anyparticular school of thought.
[Show full text]
Territorial Issues in the Israel- Palestinian Conflict
Israeli and Jordanian soldiers at the armistice line (Green Line) 1949 TERRITORIAL ISSUES IN THE ISRAEL- PALESTINIAN CONFLICT EXECUTIVE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIAN JEWRY Territorial Issues in the Israel-Palestinian conflict PETER WERTHEIM AM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, EXECUTIVE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIAN JEWRY Current Israeli and Palestinian contentions about territory and borders reflect their conﬂicting perspectives on peoplehood, historic rights to the land, legal claims, security, Jerusalem and other emotionally charged issues. The usual starting point for considering these issues is the Arab-Israel war in June 1967, during which Israel captured the Sinai Peninsula and Gaza Strip from Egypt, the West Bank, including the old city of Jerusalem, from Jordan, and the Golan Heights from Syria. However, what is now referred to as the Israel-Palestinian conflict pre-dates the 1967 war, and even pre-dates the establishment of Israel in 1948, and the founding of the modern political movement of Zionism in 1897. Arab rejection of any kind of substantial Jewish presence, political or otherwise, in what is today Israel (let alone the territories captured by Israel in 1967) can be traced back to 1891, if not earlier.1 Arab opposition to the reconstitution of the Jewish Commonwealth in any part of the Jewish people’s historic homeland has been a constant of the conflict for more than one hundred years. Although Arab leaders have at different times proffered different religious, ethnic or nationalistic reasons for that opposition, it has been their preparedness to resort to unlawful violence in an attempt to enforce that opposition, and the Jewish people’s resolve to defend themselves from it, that has made the conflict a bloody one, albeit far less costly in human lives than most other international conflicts.
[Show full text]
In All the Major Political Developments in Twentieth-Century Iran, From
THE WORKING CLASS AND THE ISLAMIC STATE IN IRAN H A I D E H M O G H I S S I A ND S A E E D R A H N E M A n all the major political developments in twentieth-century Iran, from the Iconstitutional revolution of 1906–11 and the nationalization of the oil industry in early 1950s to the political upheavals of early 1960s and the 1979 revolution, workers were major participants and demonstrated a high level of militancy. However, governments of diverse persuasions, from the Pahlavis’ modernizing dictatorial monarchy to the liberal nationalists, and the Islamists’ pre-modern theocracy, have ignored workers’ legitimate demands and suppressed their dissent. Many factors account for this failure, not least of them being the qualitative and quantitative weaknesses of the working class—a result of the specific nature of capitalist development and industrialization in Iran. Because of its own internal weaknesses, the workers’ movement has depended historically on left social democratic and communist movements both organi- zationally and intellectually. In fact, socialist and communist ideas about the workers’ right to form unions and emancipate themselves preceded the emer- gence of the working class itself. Yet dependence on external leadership made Iranian workers susceptible to the theoretical and political wavering and internal conflicts of the country’s left intelligentsia. As well, the continuous suppression of the left by successive dictatorial regimes inevitably also affected the militancy and organizational efficacy of the working-class movement. In this context, it is reasonable to argue that the progress of the working-class movement has been and continues to be directly linked to the movement for democracy and social change.
[Show full text]
Linking the Gaza Strip with the West Bank: Implications of a Palestinian Corridor Across Israel Justus Reid Weiner and Diane Morrison
Lebanon Syria Haifa Mediterranian Sea Tel-Aviv-YafoTel-Aviv-Yafo JerusalemJerusalem WestWest BBankank (Judea(Judea & SSamaria)amaria) za a GazaG I s r a e l Egypt Jordan Eilat Linking the Gaza Strip with the West Bank: Implications of a Palestinian Corridor Across Israel Justus Reid Weiner and Diane Morrison The Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs ®¯¢Ú© ‰È„ÓÂ ¯Â·Èˆ ÈÈÈÚÏ ÈÓÏ˘Â¯È‰ ÊÎ¯Ó‰ Institute for Contemporary Affairs Founded jointly with the Wechsler Family Foundation © 2007 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 13 Tel Hai Street, Jerusalem, Israel 92107 Tel. 972-2-561-9281 Fax. 972-2-561-9112 Email: [email protected] www.jcpa.org ISBN 965-218-058-0 Production Coordinator: Edna Weinstock-Gabay Graphic Design: Rami & Jacky / Efrat / Lenka Maps: Rami & Jacky Photos: AP Photo, Government Press Office Back cover photo: IDF Spokesman Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank their colleagues, Deborah Norris and Marie E. Yetsin, for their assistance. The authors appreciate the advice and assistance of Daniel Taub, Adv. Table of Contents Executive Summary 5 Introduction 9 I. The Doctrine of Statehood 11 A. The Traditional Criteria for Statehood as Enunciated by the Montevideo Convention of 1933 11 1. Criterion i: A Permanent Population 12 2. Criterion ii: A Defined Territory 12 3. Criterion iii: Government 13 4. Criterion iv: Capacity to Enter into Relations with Other States 14 5. Independence 16 B. Additional Criteria for Statehood 16 C. Additional Criteria for Statehood Suggested as a Result of Modern Developments in International Law 17 1. The Rule of Legality 18 3 2.
[Show full text]
Request for Information Railway to Eilat
STATE OF ISRAEL MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND ROAD SAFETY Economics and Planning Department Israel Railways Ltd . Request for Information Railway to Eilat November, 2010 Ministry of Transport and Road Safety, 5 Bank Israel St., 91950 Tel: +972-2-6663081 Fax: +972-2-6663083 Page 1 of 12 STATE OF ISRAEL MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND ROAD SAFETY Economics and Planning Dept. Request for Information (RFI) – Railway to Eilat Contents Subject Page 1. Goal 3 2. Background 3 3. Project Overview 4 4. Requested Information 8 5. RFI Procedure and Schedule 10 6. Miscellaneous 10 Appendices 11 Ministry of Transport and Road Safety, 5 Bank Israel St., 91950 Tel: +972-2-6663081 Fax: +972-2-6663083 Page 2 of 12 STATE OF ISRAEL MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND ROAD SAFETY Economics and Planning Dept. 1. Goal The Government of the State of Israel (hereinafter "GOI") is developing plans for a rail connection between Tel Aviv and Eilat (hereinafter "the Project"), and is considering contracting out to the private sector the implementation of the Project. See Project map in Appendix I. The GOI, therefore, invites interested parties worldwide to submit a detailed response to this RFI, in order that it may: examine private sector interest in design, construction, finance and operation; examine private sector capabilities; determine the form of private sector party participation in the Project implementation; and determine specifications of planning and design. 2. Background 2.1. Government Resolution #1421 from February 24th 2010 instructed the GOI to promote, inter alia, the design of a railway to Eilat. 2.2. This instruction is part of a broader program – Netivei Israel ("Israel Lines") - Transport Program for the Promotion of the Negev and the Galilee, 2010 - whose purpose is to develop Israel's peripheral areas by connecting them to the central region of the country .
[Show full text]
Palestine and the Arab-Israeli Conflict: 1948– 1970
PALESTINE AND THE ARAB-ISRAELI CONFLICT: 1948– 1970 by Dr Charles D. Smith, University of Arizona With the declaration of Israeli independence on May 14, 1948, the nature of the Arab-Israeli conflict and Britain’s role in it entered a new phase. Before Israel’s creation, the conflict was one between Zionism and the Palestinian Arabs that originated prior to World War I as a result of Jewish immigration into Palestine with the goal of ultimately creating a Jewish state. This objective had gained official recognition with the issuance of the Balfour Declaration by Great Britain on November 2, 1917. It promised British support to create “in Palestine a national home for the Jewish people,” understood by British and Zionist officials to mean a Jewish state in all of Palestine. Once the Balfour Declaration was incorporated into the 1922 British mandate for Palestine, Britain was obligated to prepare an incoming Jewish population for self-government, not the existing Arab population; mandates had been instituted with the idea of preparing local inhabitants for future independence. As the mandatory power responsible for Palestine, Britain had faced an Arab revolt in the 1930s which it had crushed, and then a Jewish revolt from 1945 onward demanding a Jewish state. Faced with world knowledge of the Holocaust and American pressure favouring Zionism, Britain decided to abdicate its responsibility and in February 1947 handed the Palestine question over to the newly formed United Nations, though British forces remained in Palestine to May 1948. The U.N. General Assembly approved recommendations for partition of Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state in November 1947, leading to intense civil strife between Jews and mostly Palestinian Arabs that resulted in the creation of Israel.
[Show full text]