DOCSLIB.ORG

Report to Scrutiny

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Report to Scrutiny Item Number: Contains Confidential or No Exempt Information Subject of Report: Overview of Rail Connectivity in the Borough Scrutiny Review Panel 2 – 2016/2017: Transport Meeting: 14 th September 2016 Russell Roberts Service Report Author: Principal Transport Planner Email: [email protected] Tel: 020-8825 9430 Harjeet Bains Scrutiny Officer: Scrutiny Review Officer Email: [email protected] Tel: 020-8825 7120 Councillor Bassam Mahfouz Cabinet Responsibility: (Transport, Environment and Leisure) Lucy Taylor, Director, Regeneration and Planning Director Responsibility: Email:[email protected] Tel: 020-8825 9036 To consider the effectiveness of rail connectivity (e.g. night Tube, Overground, Heathrow Connect, First Great Brief: Western, TfL, Chiltern Railways, Gatwick connections, Greenford Spur, etc.) in the borough and make recommendations for further improvements accordingly. The Panel is recommended to: - consider and comment on the information provided on Recommendations: rail connectivity in the borough; - identify areas for further review at future meetings; and - make suggestions for further improvements where necessary. Page 1 of 15 1. Background 1.1 Ealing has quite an extensive rail and Underground (Tube) network predominately arranged on a radial basis to and from central London. The Central, District and Piccadilly lines as well as the Heathrow Express, Heathrow Connect, Great Western Railway, Chiltern and London Overground all serve stations within the borough. However, whilst there are strong east-west, radial connections, there are limitations on north-south, orbital connections to other parts of west London to and from Ealing. The network coverage is best in the east and central of the borough with most of these areas being within a 12 minute walk (960 metres) of at least one station. However, in the west the rail and Tube networks do not provide good coverage (see map 1). 1.2 Rail and Tube journeys account for 10% of trips starting in Ealing, and are split 2% and 8% of trips respectively. Table 1 below shows Ealing’s modal split compared to the west and outer London borough averages. Table 1 – Rail/Tube Mode Share Comparison Borough Rail Tube Ealing 2% 8% west London 2% 8% outer London 4% 4% 1.3 In terms of actual numbers of journeys, there are 49,280 daily Tube trips and 12,320 daily rail trips per day out of an all modes total 616,000 trips per day originating in Ealing. 1.4 Due to the very high costs associated with new rail/ Tube stations and extensions for in order to justify any changes to these networks, there needs to be significant levels of either new or existing development to satisfy the challenging business case requirements. Railway proposals will be compared to proposals in other areas in terms of benefits and disbenefits. Any new rail infrastructure is also likely to require taking land from existing buildings and/or green space. Whilst tunnelling may be a method of reducing impacts on surface uses, the costs are extremely high with planning and construction taking several years to complete (see Crossrail and High Speed 2 examples). 1.5 In recent years therefore, Ealing officers have focussed on improving the reliability and frequency of services on the existing networks. For example, officers helped to negotiate four trains per hour through Hanwell Station as part of the Crossrail plans. As train paths (capacity) get filled up, future enhancements could be investigated in terms of lengthening trains to provide more seats. This approach has been used on London Overground (North London Line). However, stations may need to be modified to accommodate longer trains, particularly where platforms require lengthening. 1.6 Ealing is set to benefit from two new railways with enhanced stations currently being designed to serve the borough, Crossrail and High Speed 2. There are also proposals for possible future rail links between Southall and Brentford plus Hounslow to Old Oak Common via Acton. Page 2 of 15 2. Crossrail Services 2.1 Crossrail will take over both GWR local services and Heathrow Connect into London Paddington in May 2018 (see map 2). From January 2019 Crossrail will extend current train paths through a central London tunnel to provide direct services across London to Shenfield and Abbey Wood in to the east with intermediate stops underground including Bond Street and Canary Wharf. The total cost of this project is £14,800,000,000. 2.2 The introduction of Crossrail services in January 2019 is expected to bring significant accessibility benefits to the five Crossrail stations in the borough. All of the stations (Acton Mainline, Ealing Broadway, West Ealing, Hanwell and Southall) will be step- free and the enhanced service pattern (up to ten trains per hour) alongside significantly improved journey times into London will raise the PTALS in many parts of the borough. For example, the journey time from Southall to the West End will drop down to 19 minutes with no change required. 2.3 Crossrail is predicted to generate significant increases in passenger numbers for the stations it serves. For example, at Ealing Broadway there will be 21,150,000 passengers by 2026 a 25.9% increase on 2015 levels (see appendix 1), this and further future increases have been accounted for with a capacity of 27,000,000 passengers per year. 2.4 The Council has also secured £7,300,000 from TfL to invest in the areas around each of the five stations through Crossrail Complementary Measures (CCM) funding. This will see improvements to public realm and wider public transport connectivity through revisions to bus infrastructure and more integrated station frontages. 3. High Speed 2 railway 3.1 The government is promoting the High Speed 2 (HS2) railway to provide a new link between London and Birmingham (phase one) with extensions also proposed to Leeds and Manchester (phase two). The total cost of HS2 phase 1 is estimated at £42,600,000,000. 3.2 Within LB Ealing HS2 would be in a tunnel from East Acton to the boundary with Hillingdon at Northolt broadly following the alignment of the Central line, West Ruislip branch (see map 2). A new station in Hammersmith and Fulham is proposed on the current site of the Old Oak Common railway depot (immediately to the east of the borough boundary at Old Oak Lane). Officers are working with schemes promoters HS2 Ltd, to minimise the impacts of construction and operation on local residents and businesses. A Hybrid Bill to attain consent for this scheme will be going to the House of Lords this Autumn. Construction is due to begin in 2017 and last until completion of phase one in 2026 and 2033 for phase two. 4. Other Future Rail infrastructure 4.1 Two new railway projects with alignments through LB Ealing are being promoted by Hounslow Council. An officer from Hounslow will attend the meeting to provide further details. 4.2 The first is a proposal to introduce passenger rail services on the freight railway line Page 3 of 15 between Southall and Brentford (circled on Map 1). This project would require track and signalling works to provide a three train an hour ‘shuttle’ service from Southall station (and Crossrail services) to the development area beside the A4 Great West Road. The estimated cost of this project is over £40,000,000. 4.3 The second proposal is to provide passenger rail services between Hounslow to Old Oak Common using the ‘Kew curve’ alignment currently used by freight trains to provide a link between the ‘Hounslow Loop’ railway line (including Brentford) to the NLL to connect with Crossrail and HS2 (see map 2). This proposal would provide additional services to South Acton and Acton Central, however, the level crossings adjacent to these two stations would also be affected. The estimated cost of this project is around £20,000,000. 4.4 TfL is currently planning and designing a second new railway in tunnels across London, Crossrail 2. This will link south west London to north east London via central London with stations at Victoria and Tottenham Court Road and could be operational by 2030. This ‘Metro’ route is expected to cost £27,000,000,000 in total. Whilst a longer, ‘Regional’ option running from Cheshunt in Hertfordshire to Epsom in Surrey, passing through central London via stations and is estimated to cost £32,000,000,000. Page 4 of 15 5. Tube Services 5.1 Ealing is served by three Tube lines, the Central, District and Piccadilly services (see map 1). 5.2 The Central line consists of two branches within LB Ealing, the Ealing Broadway and West Ruislip branches which are joined at a junction to the west of North Acton station. The Ealing Broadway branch includes West Acton and, at its terminus, Ealing Broadway, stations. The West Ruislip branch includes Hanger Lane, Perivale, Greenford and Northolt stations within LB Ealing. The Central lines connects Ealing to central and east London and other significant stations on this route include Shepherds Bush, Oxford Circus, Bank and Stratford. 5.3 The District line consists of the Ealing Broadway branch only within LB Ealing and serves Chiswick Park, Acton Town, Ealing Common and Ealing Broadway. The District Line connects Ealing to south west London (Richmond and Wimbledon), central London (including direct trains to Gatwick Airport from Victoria Station) plus east London. New rolling stock offering more space and walk-through carriages have been introduced on the District line within the last two years. This will be followed by a signaling upgrade soon as part of TfL’s Four Lines Modernisation programme. When these improvements are complete by 2023, the capacity of the District line will increase by 24%, which means it will be able to carry about 10,000 more passengers an hour.
Recommended publications
  • Greenford Square, London Ub6

    Greenford Square, London Ub6

    TWO GREENFORD SQUARE A self-contained office and education facility GREENFORD SQUARE, LONDON UB6 0HE (dual D1 & B1 use), set in a six acre landscaped From 9,418 sq ft - 97,028 sq ft campus, offering secure on-site car parking, with excellent transport links into central London. BUILDING OVERVIEW Two Greenford Square is set in a six Only a 9 minute walk to Sudbury Hill • Dual D1 & B1 use. acre, multi-use, campus providing an tube (Piccadilly Line) and overground • HQ Campus of 97,028 sq ft. attractive working environment within station, with direct connections to a landscaped setting. London Marylebone in just 16 minutes. TO LET • Self-contained options for 28,269 sq ft and 68,759 sq ft. The building is adjacent to the Ferrero Within an 8 minute walk from Greenford UK HQ and the mixed-use Greystar tube (Central Line) and overground • 275 car parking spaces at a regeneration, Greenford Quay. station, with direct links to West Ealing ratio of 1:353 sq ft. in only 11 minutes, one of five Crossrail stations that the London Borough of Ealing has to offer. 01 VEHICLE ACCESS OLDFIELD LANE NORTH FERRERO UK & IRELAND HQ 275 SPACE CAR PARK VEHICLE ACCESS B E PEDESTRIAN R K E ACCESS L E Y A V E N U E A4127 D A O R D R O F N E E R G GREENFORD QUAY REDEVELOPMENT 1,965 NEW HOMES AND 200,000 SQ FT OF COMMERCIAL ACCOMMODATION 02 Greystar is creating a new canal-side neighbourhood, • 1,965 residential units and 200,000 sq ft of • High-quality and well-managed public which is inclusive of the surrounding community and retail and commercial space.
  • History of the East London Line

    History of the East London Line

    HISTORY OF THE EAST LONDON LINE – FROM BRUNEL’S THAMES TUNNEL TO THE LONDON OVERGROUND by Oliver Green A report of the LURS meeting at All Souls Club House on 11 October 2011 Oliver worked at the London Transport Museum for many years and was one of the team who set up the Covent Garden museum in 1980. He left in 1989 to continue his museum career in Colchester, Poole and Buckinghamshire before returning to LTM in 2001 to work on its recent major refurbishment and redisplay in the role of Head Curator. He retired from this post in 2009 but has been granted an honorary Research Fellowship and continues to assist the museum in various projects. He is currently working with LTM colleagues on a new history of the Underground which will be published by Penguin in October 2012 as part of LU’s 150th anniversary celebrations for the opening of the Met [Bishops Road to Farringdon Street 10 January 1863.] The early 1800s saw various schemes to tunnel under the River Thames, including one begun in 1807 by Richard Trevithick which was abandoned two years later when the workings were flooded. This was started at Rotherhithe, close to the site later chosen by Marc Isambard Brunel for his Thames Tunnel. In 1818, inspired by the boring technique of shipworms he had studied while working at Chatham Dockyard, Brunel patented a revolutionary method of digging through soft ground using a rectangular shield. His giant iron shield was divided into 12 independently moveable protective frames, each large enough for a miner to work in.
  • The Operator's Story Appendix

    The Operator's Story Appendix

    Railway and Transport Strategy Centre The Operator’s Story Appendix: London’s Story © World Bank / Imperial College London Property of the World Bank and the RTSC at Imperial College London Community of Metros CoMET The Operator’s Story: Notes from London Case Study Interviews February 2017 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide a permanent record for the researchers of what was said by people interviewed for ‘The Operator’s Story’ in London. These notes are based upon 14 meetings between 6th-9th October 2015, plus one further meeting in January 2016. This document will ultimately form an appendix to the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’ piece Although the findings have been arranged and structured by Imperial College London, they remain a collation of thoughts and statements from interviewees, and continue to be the opinions of those interviewed, rather than of Imperial College London. Prefacing the notes is a summary of Imperial College’s key findings based on comments made, which will be drawn out further in the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’. Method This content is a collation in note form of views expressed in the interviews that were conducted for this study. Comments are not attributed to specific individuals, as agreed with the interviewees and TfL. However, in some cases it is noted that a comment was made by an individual external not employed by TfL (‘external commentator’), where it is appropriate to draw a distinction between views expressed by TfL themselves and those expressed about their organisation.
  • Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945

    Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945

    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--History History 2016 Minding the Gap: Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945 Danielle K. Dodson University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2016.339 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Dodson, Danielle K., "Minding the Gap: Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945" (2016). Theses and Dissertations--History. 40. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/history_etds/40 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the History at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--History by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
  • Brent Infrastructure Funding Statement 2019-20 FINAL.Pdf

    Brent Infrastructure Funding Statement 2019-20 FINAL.Pdf

    1 Introduction 1.1 Brent is the 6th largest borough in London with a population of 334,700. It is projected to grow by at least 17% and reach 400,000 people by 2040. 1.2 The draft Brent Local Plan outlines an ambitious strategy to accommodate development in the borough to 2041. To support this growth, significant investment in infrastructure will be required. 1.3 An Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) supports the Local Plan. It sets out short, medium and longer-term infrastructure requirements to address growth needs. The IDP will be used to support the allocation of Community Infrastructure (CIL) and Section 106 (s106) funding. 1.4 This is the Council’s first Annual Infrastructure Funding Statement (IFS). It has been prepared in line with the Community Infrastructure Levy (Amendment) Regulations 2019 and covers income and expenditure relating to CIL and s106 obligations for the financial year 2019/20. It also, where possible, sets out future spending priorities on infrastructure in line with the growth identified in the draft Brent Local Plan. 1.5 The Council uses s106 agreements and CIL to support development and mitigate its impacts and maximise the benefits and opportunities from growth to deliver the priorities of the Borough Plan (the Council’s Corporate Plan) and the Brent Local Plan. 1.6 The IFS sets out what infrastructure has been delivered to date via CIL and s106 planning obligations, as well as identifying, where it is able to do so, future infrastructure spending priorities. 1.7 The IFS will also help communities understand how the level of growth outlined in the Local Plan can deliver tangible outcomes and investment in infrastructure projects such as new public realm, health facilities, schools, transport and open space that will support long-term growth and development of the borough.
  • A31 Note: Gunnersbury Station Does Not Have OWER H91 E D

    A31 Note: Gunnersbury Station Does Not Have OWER H91 E D

    C R S D E A U T S A VE N E R A N B B D L W Based on Bartholomews mapping. Reproduced by permission of S R E i N U st A R O HarperCollins Publishers Ltd., Bishopbriggs, Glasgow. 2013Y ri E E A Y c W R A t D A AD www.bartholomewmaps.com N C R 272 O Y V L D R i TO T AM 272 OL E H D BB N n A O CAN CO By Train e N Digital Cartography by Pindar Creative N U L E n w i a L Getting to BSI m lk 5 i AVE 1 ng N A Acton0- t V 1 im • The London Overground runs between E t e e LD ROAD B491 D N a SOUTHFIE E Y Town fr R Address: Chiswick Tower, U imR B o B E U O 440 m Richmond and Stratford stopping at Travel to E x L D B A R o S L AD R r O E RO O s 389 Chiswick High Road, London, W4 4AL Y R G R E p EY L i SPELDHUR Gunnersbury. ID ST R A R R t RO M p NR B E A O N e D NU O H L A A UB E LL C D GS BO T Y British Standards 1 R E RSET E E 9 N L SOM T N All visitors must enter the building through F 44 U N H • The ‘Hounslow Loop’ has stations at G SOUTH ROAD BEDFORD B E3 E B E R the main entrance on Chiswick High Road O Kew Bridge, Richmond, Weybridge, N O L PARK D Institution S ACTON L A A A D N E O R E O D and report to Reception on arrival.
  • Park Royal Opportunity Area Planning Framework Part B

    Park Royal Opportunity Area Planning Framework Part B

    PAGE106 Mayor of London Chapter 10 Park Royal proposals 10.1 Introduction 10.2 Central Park Royal 10.3 The Northern Gateway and Alperton 10.4 The Western Gateway 10.5 The Southern Gateway 10.6 The Eastern Gateway 10.7 Neighbourhood Centre the Heart of Park Royal PAGE107 10.1 Introduction OBJECTIVE 1 Protect and maintain Park Royal as the largest industrial employment location in London, Park Royal, together with Willesden The OAPF proposes to intensify commercial supporting the clusters of food/drink, Junction, extends to 700 hectares. It development on under utilised sites across Park distribution/logistics and TV/film through accommodates a range of employment Royal. Regeneration must continue to ensure the facilities and services to support growth. estate functions as a prime location for business uses from manufacturing to in London. Some sites have planning guidance; distribution/logistics and TV/film, with others have site-specific allocations in LDFs. OBJECTIVE 6 approximately 2,000 businesses and The OAPF identifies four gateways, and a Improve access to Park Royal at the four Gateways, employing around 40,000 people. Neighbourhood Centre at the heart of Park Royal. Alperton, Old Oak and Kensal Canalside and secure London Plan policy 5F.2 identifies Park These areas have the capacity to accommodate successful redevelopment of major sites to deliver a more intense form of mixed-use development employment-led growth, high quality amenities and Royal as an Opportunity Area with a of approximately 294,849 sq.m. of mix commercial a better environment. target to accommodate 11,000 new jobs and 500 new homes over the next uses and all of the proposed 3,500 residential units.
  • Planning Committee 23/05/2018 Schedule Item No. 03

    Planning Committee 23/05/2018 Schedule Item No. 03

    Planning Committee 23/05/2018 Schedule Item No. 03 Ref : 181062OPDFUL Address: 140 Wales Farm Road, Acton W3 6UG Ward: East Acton Proposal: Demolition of existing buildings and redevelopment of site to provide 3 No. residential buildings between 12 and 25 storeys in height to provide 380 residential units (comprising 66 No. studios, 190 No. 1 bed, 104 No. 2 bed and 20 No. 3 bed flats) and 1,403 sq.m of flexible A1/A2/A3/A4/A5/B1/D1/D2 floor space; the provision of public open space, roof top amenity space, landscaping, car and cycle parking, and refuse storage (Full Planning Application accompanied by an Environmental Impact Assessment: Resubmission). Drawing numbers/plans: Drawing numbers for Job Number 16043: (01)-E-100 Revision PL; (01)-E-001 Revision PL; (01)-E-002 Revision PL; (01)-E- 003 Revision PL; (01)-E-004 Revision PL; (03)-P-S000 Revision PL; (01)-P-S001 Revision PL; (01)-P-S002 Revision PL; (03)-E-200 Revision PL; (03)-E-201 Revision A; (03)-E-202 Revision PL; (03)-E-203 Revision PL; (03)-E-204 Revision PL; (03)-E-205 Revision PL; (03)-E-206 Revision PL; (03)-E-207 Revision PL; (03)-E-220 Revision A; (03)-E-221 Revision PL; (03)-P-0B0 Revision PL; (03)-P-0G0 Revision PL; (03)-P-0M0 Revision PL; (03)-P-001 Revision A; (03)-P-002 Revision A; (03)-P-011 Revision A; (03)-P-012 Revision A; (03)-P-013 Revision PL; (03)-P-015 Revision PL; (03)-P-016 Revision PL; (03)-P-022 Revision PL; (03)-P-023 Revision PL; (03)-P-0R0 Revision PL; (03)-X-100 Revision PL; (03)-X-101 Revision PL; (03)-X-102 Revision PL; (03)-X-103 Revision PL; (03)-E-250
  • Buses from Ealing Common

    Buses from Ealing Common

    Buses from Ealing Common 483 towards Harrow Bus Station for Harrow-on-the-Hill Buses from Ealing Commonfrom stops EM, EP, ER N83 towards Golders Green from stops EM, EP, ER N7 483 towards Northolt Alperton towards Harrow Bus Station for Harrow-on-the-Hill from stops EH, EJ, EK, EL from stops EM, EP, ER 483 N83 N7 Argyle Road N83 towards Golders Green from stops EM, EP, ER N7 towardsE11 Northolt Alperton Route 112 towards North Finchley does not call at any bus stops within the central map. fromtowards stops Greenford EH, EJ, EK Broadway, EL Pitshanger Lane Ealing Road Route 112 towards North Finchley can be boarded from stops EW 483 at stops on Hanger Lane (Hillcrest Road, Station or N83 N7 Argyle Road Hanger Lane Gyratory). Quill Street 218 Castle Bar Park from stops Hanger Lane EA, ED, EE, EF Gyratory North Acton Woodeld Road Hanger Lane E11 Copley Close Route 112 towards North Finchley does not call 483 N83 at any bus stops within the central map. Northelds towards Greenford Broadway Road Pitshanger Lane Ealing Road Hanger Lane Route 112 towards North Finchley can be boarded Victoria from stops EW at stops on Hanger Lane (Hillcrest Road, Station or E11 Hillcrest Road 218 Road Browning Avenue N7 Hanger Lane Gyratory). 218 Quill Street Eastelds 218 Castle Bar Park Drayton Green Road North Ealing West Acton from stops Gypsy Hangerq Lane EA, ED, EE, EF Corner Eaton Rise IVE STATION APPROA GyratoryEEN’S DR CH e Westelds QU Road North Acton Woodeld Road ROAD Hanger Lane AD Copley Close 112 ELEY RO Noel Road MAD Northelds 483 N83‰ L Road
  • Page 1 Email

    Page 1 Email

    www.haveringeastlondonramblers.btck.co.uk email: [email protected] Mobile: 07583 532309 Newsletter and Programme December 2018 - March 2019 Chair's Report Another programme and a New Year on our horizon, how time flies by. We have just had our 30th AGM where we reflected on the year making note of our achievements and challenges, which includes our 30th anniversary, the rekindling of our social events and not to forget the ‘walking and talking’ aspect. The challenges faced and which will continue are Network Rail issues, GDPR and Data Transition. All of these issues will continue to progress in 2019 and we will gather and reflect your comments to and from Area. I have reviewed all the programmes 2017/18 just to get an idea of the walking distance and believe it or not the Group has walked over 788 miles, more or less from Lands End to John O’Groats. This does not include any pre- walks or detours!! This is some achievement with only 31 walk leaders, who collectively put on 125 walks. I would like to extend my thanks to every walk leader, back marker and the Committee members who have ensure everything has run smoothly in putting the programmes together, communicating information and delivery of walks. Great team work makes happy walkers. Page 1 Can I be the first to wish everyone a Happy Christmas and Happy New Year. My last word for now: May the road rise up to meet you. May the wind be always at your back. May the sun shine warm upon your face; the rains fall soft upon the fields May the muddy bogs and styles be few and May there be plentiful bushes for your convenience.
  • Brunel's Dream

    Brunel's Dream

    Global Foresights | Global Trends and Hitachi’s Involvement Brunel’s Dream Kenji Kato Industrial Policy Division, Achieving Comfortable Mobility Government and External Relations Group, Hitachi, Ltd. The design of Paddington Station’s glass roof was infl u- Renowned Engineer Isambard enced by the Crystal Palace building erected as the venue for Kingdom Brunel London’s fi rst Great Exhibition held in 1851. Brunel was also involved in the planning for Crystal Palace, serving on the The resigned sigh that passed my lips on arriving at Heathrow building committee of the Great Exhibition, and acclaimed Airport was prompted by the long queues at immigration. the resulting structure of glass and iron. Being the gateway to London, a city known as a melting pot Rather than pursuing effi ciency in isolation, Brunel’s of races, the arrivals processing area was jammed with travel- approach to constructing the Great Western Railway was to ers from all corners of the world; from Europe of course, but make the railway lines as fl at as possible so that passengers also from the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and North and South could enjoy a pleasant journey while taking in Britain’s won- America. What is normally a one-hour wait can stretch to derful rural scenery. He employed a variety of techniques to two or more hours if you are unfortunate enough to catch a overcome the constraints of the terrain, constructing bridges, busy time of overlapping fl ight arrivals. While this only adds cuttings, and tunnels to achieve this purpose. to the weariness of a long journey, the prospect of comfort Rain, Steam and Speed – The Great Western Railway, a famous awaits you on the other side.
  • Submissions to the Call for Evidence from Organisations

    Submissions to the Call for Evidence from Organisations

    Submissions to the call for evidence from organisations Ref Organisation RD - 1 Abbey Flyer Users Group (ABFLY) RD - 2 ASLEF RD - 3 C2c RD - 4 Chiltern Railways RD - 5 Clapham Transport Users Group RD - 6 London Borough of Ealing RD - 7 East Surrey Transport Committee RD – 8a East Sussex RD – 8b East Sussex Appendix RD - 9 London Borough of Enfield RD - 10 England’s Economic Heartland RD – 11a Enterprise M3 LEP RD – 11b Enterprise M3 LEP RD - 12 First Great Western RD – 13a Govia Thameslink Railway RD – 13b Govia Thameslink Railway (second submission) RD - 14 Hertfordshire County Council RD - 15 Institute for Public Policy Research RD - 16 Kent County Council RD - 17 London Councils RD - 18 London Travelwatch RD – 19a Mayor and TfL RD – 19b Mayor and TfL RD - 20 Mill Hill Neighbourhood Forum RD - 21 Network Rail RD – 22a Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) RD – 22b Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) – Annex RD - 23 London Borough of Redbridge RD - 24 Reigate, Redhill and District Rail Users Association RD - 25 RMT RD - 26 Sevenoaks Rail Travellers Association RD - 27 South London Partnership RD - 28 Southeastern RD - 29 Surrey County Council RD - 30 The Railway Consultancy RD - 31 Tonbridge Line Commuters RD - 32 Transport Focus RD - 33 West Midlands ITA RD – 34a West Sussex County Council RD – 34b West Sussex County Council Appendix RD - 1 Dear Mr Berry In responding to your consultation exercise at https://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london- assembly/investigations/how-would-you-run-your-own-railway, I must firstly apologise for slightly missing the 1st July deadline, but nonetheless I hope that these views can still be taken into consideration by the Transport Committee.