Gemeindeforum Rosenheim Süd | 14. Sitzung | 25.06.2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Stadtinformation Rosenheim AUSGABE 2020 AUSGABE
Stadtinformation Rosenheim AUSGABE 2020 AUSGABE Für Neubürger, Bürger, neue Unternehmen, Neukunden und Gäste Inhalt Stadt Rosenheim .....................................................................................4 Grußwort | Geschichte | Politik | Rathäuser | Städtische Gesellschaften & Behörden | Medien Gerichte | Vereine und Verbände | Parkplätze | Stadtplan | Was erledige ich wo? Wirtschaft ...............................................................................................31 Zahlen | Daten | Fakten | Wirtschaftseinrichtungen | Entwicklung Bahnhofsareal Innungen | Gewerkschaften Freizeit und Kultur .................................................................................43 Kino | Konzerte | Theater | Kartenvorverkauf | Archiv | Ausstellungen | Museen | Bibliothek Märkte | Tourismus | Sportvereine und -verbände | Bäder | Spiel- und Bolzplätze | Sportgala Familie ....................................................................................................59 Kinderbetreuung | Schulen | Kinder- und Jugenförderung | Beratungsstellen Soziale Einrichtungen | Kirchen | Religiöse Einrichtungen Einkaufen ...............................................................................................81 Einkaufen in Rosenheim | Fairtrade Gesundheit .............................................................................................85 Ärzte | Apotheken | Kliniken | Krankenkassen | Sonstige Einrichtungen des Gesundheitswesens Dienstleister ...........................................................................................91 -
Risk-Based Flood Protection Planning Under Climate
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1327–1347, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1327-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Risk-based flood protection planning under climate change and modeling uncertainty: a pre-alpine case study Beatrice Dittes1, Maria Kaiser2, Olga Špackovᡠ1, Wolfgang Rieger2, Markus Disse2, and Daniel Straub1 1Engineering Risk Analysis Group, Technische Universität München, Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Munich, Germany 2Chair of Hydrology and River Basin Management, Technische Universität München, Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Munich, Germany Correspondence: Beatrice Dittes ([email protected]) Received: 8 November 2017 – Discussion started: 21 November 2017 Revised: 2 April 2018 – Accepted: 17 April 2018 – Published: 15 May 2018 Abstract. Planning authorities are faced with a range of thorities to take decisions on flood protection planning that questions when planning flood protection measures: is the are economical while not leading to excessive losses or high existing protection adequate for current and future demands adjustment costs. It is important to consider costs – in con- or should it be extended? How will flood patterns change in struction, adjustment and flood damage – over the entire the future? How should the uncertainty pertaining to this in- measure life time. fluence the planning decision, e.g., for delaying planning or Ideally, the planning of flood protection infrastructure is including a safety margin? Is it sufficient to follow a pro- performed through a risk-based approach. Thereby, potential tection criterion (e.g., to protect from the 100-year flood) or damage is considered in the decision-making process. -
Long-Term Planning for Flood Protection Infrastructure in an Uncertain Climate
Technische Universität München Ingenieurfakultät Bau Geo Umwelt Professur für Risikoanalyse und Zuverlässigkeit Long-Term Planning for Flood Protection Infrastructure in an Uncertain Climate Beatrice Charlotte Michaela Dittes-Li Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Ingenieurfakultät Bau Geo Umwelt der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktor-Ingenieurs genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Markus Disse Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Prof. Dr. Daniel Straub 2. Prof. Dr. Kazuyoshi Nishijima, Kyoto-Universität 3. Prof. Dr. Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen, Technische Universität Dänemark Die Dissertation wurde am 16.11.2017 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Ingenieurfakultät Bau Geo Umwelt am 06.04.2018 angenommen. Acknowledgements In German, a PhD student habitually refers to their PhD supervisor as their ‘doctoral mother’ or ‘doctoral father’. I well and truly feel that Prof. Dr. Daniel Straub and Dr. Olga Špačková, who proposed and guided the research of this thesis, have been my ‘doctoral parents’. They nourished me intellectually (occasionally with food, too) and gave any question their full and undivided time and attention. I could not have wished for better mentors. It is thanks to them and the other employees at the chair of Engineering Risk Analysis that I really felt at home during my many hours there. I would also like to express my gratitude to Prof. Dr. Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen and Prof. Dr. Kazuyoshi Nishijima, who agreed to act as referees. Special thanks further goes to ‘the hydrologists’ – Maria Kaiser, Dr. Wolfgang Rieger and Prof. Dr. Markus Disse – with whom I closely and pleasantly collaborated and who answered any of my hydrological questions, however simple they might have been. -
Risk-Based Flood Protection Planning Under Climate Change and Modelling Uncertainty: a Pre-Alpine Case Study
Risk-based flood protection planning under climate change and modelling uncertainty: a pre-alpine case study Beatrice Dittes1, Maria Kaiser2, Olga Špačková1, Wolfgang Rieger2, Markus Disse2, Daniel Straub1 1Engineering Risk Analysis Group, Technische Universität München, München, 80333, Germany 5 2Chair of Hydrology and River Basin Management, Technische Universität München, München, 80333, Germany Correspondence to: Beatrice Dittes ([email protected]) Abstract Planning authorities are faced with a range of questions when planning flood protection measures: is the existing protection adequate for current and future demands or should it be extended? How will flood patterns change in the future? How should 10 the uncertainty pertaining to this influence the planning decision, e.g. for delaying planning or including a safety margin? Is it sufficient to follow a protection criterion (e.g. to protect from the 100-year flood) or should the planning be conducted in a risk-based way? How important is it for flood protection planning to accurately estimate flood frequency (changes), costs and damages? These are questions that we address for a medium-sized pre-alpine catchment in southern Germany, using a sequential Bayesian decision making framework that quantitatively addresses the full spectrum of uncertainty. We evaluate 15 different flood protection systems considered by local agencies in a test study catchment. Despite large uncertainties in damage, cost and climate, the recommendation is robustly for the most conservative approach. This demonstrates the feasibility of making robust decisions under large uncertainty. Furthermore, by comparison to a previous study, it highlights the benefits of risk-based planning over a planning of flood protection to a prescribed return period. -
Risk-Based Flood Protection Planning Under Climate Change and Modelling Uncertainty: a Pre-Alpine Case Study
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2017-399 Manuscript under review for journal Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discussion started: 21 November 2017 c Author(s) 2017. CC BY 4.0 License. Risk-based flood protection planning under climate change and modelling uncertainty: a pre-alpine case study Beatrice Dittes1, Maria Kaiser2, Olga Špačková1, Wolfgang Rieger2, Markus Disse2, Daniel Straub1 1Engineering Risk Analysis Group, Technische Universität München, München, 80333, Germany 5 2Chair of Hydrology and River Basin Management, Technische Universität München, München, 80333, Germany Correspondence to: Beatrice Dittes ([email protected]) Abstract Planning authorities are faced with a range of questions when planning flood protection measures: is the existing protection adequate for current and future demands or should it be extended? How will flood patterns change in the future? How should 10 the uncertainty pertaining to this influence the planning decision, e.g. for delaying planning or including a safety margin? Is it sufficient to follow a protection criterion (e.g. to protect from the 100-year flood) or should the planning be conducted in a risk-based way? How important is it for flood protection planning to accurately estimate flood frequency (changes), costs and damages? These are questions that we address for a medium-sized pre-alpine catchment in southern Germany, using a sequential Bayesian decision making framework that quantitatively addresses the full spectrum of uncertainty. We evaluate 15 different flood protection systems considered by local agencies in a test study catchment. Despite large uncertainties in damage, cost and climate, the recommendation is robustly for the most conservative approach. -
Publicatieblad C 363
ISSN 0378-7079 Publicatieblad C 363 43e jaargang van de Europese Gemeenschappen 18 december 2000 Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal Mededelingen en bekendmakingen Nummer Inhoud Bladzijde I Mededelingen Commissie 2000/C 363/01 Lijst van kredietinstellingen volgens artikel 3, lid 7, en artikel 10, lid 2, van Richtlijn 77/780/EEG Stand per 31 december 1999) Ð Achttiende uitgave . ............. 1 Prijs: 59,50 EUR NL 18.12.2000 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen C 363/1 I Mededelingen) COMMISSIE Lijst van kredietinstellingen bedoeld in artikel 3, lid 7, en artikel 10, lid 2, van Richtlijn 77/780/EEG 2000/C 363/01) Volgens artikel 3, lid 7, en artikel 10, lid 2, van Eerste Richtlijn kredietinstellingen die zijn aangesloten bij de Rabo-banken in 77/780/EEGvan de Raad van 12 december 1977 tot cooÈrdinatie Nederland, alsmede op de caisses agricoles te Luxemburg van de wettelijke en bestuursrechtelijke bepalingen betreffende hoewel de toepassing van de richtlijn voor deze hoe dan ook de toegang tot en de uitoefening van de werkzaamheden van krachtens artikel 2, lid 5 en lid 6, is uitgesteld). kredietinstellingen 1) moet de Commissie een lijst aanleggen van alle kredietinstellingen in de lidstaten aan welke een vergunning De hiernavolgende lijst is door de Commissie opgemaakt aan de is toegekend, en deze lijst bekendmaken. hand van de opgaven der lidstaten. De lijst heeft Ð anders dan de bankenregisters in sommige lidstaten Ð geen constitutieve De Commissie kwijt zich ten achttiende male van deze taak met werking. Wanneer een niet toegelaten onderneming in de lijst deze mededeling. De lijst in de bijlage van deze mededeling is verschijnt, heeft dat geen rechtelijke gevolgen. -
Diario Oficial C 353 44O Año De Las Comunidades Europeas 12 De Diciembre De 2001
ISSN 0257-7763 Diario Oficial C 353 44o año de las Comunidades Europeas 12 de diciembre de 2001 Edición en lengua española Comunicaciones e informaciones Número de información Sumario Página I Comunicaciones Comisión 2001/C 353/01 Lista de entidades de crédito elaborada con arreglo al artículo 11 de la Directiva 2000/12/CE (situación a 31 de diciembre de 2000)— Decimonovena edición ....... 1 Precio: 59,50 EUR ES 12.12.2001 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas C 353/1 I (Comunicaciones) COMISIÓN Lista de entidades de crédito elaborada con arreglo al artículo 11 de la Directiva 2000/12/CE (2001/C 353/01) De conformidad con el artículo 11 de la Directiva 2000/12/CE Directiva. Las entidades de crédito en liquidación tampoco del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo,de 20 de marzo de 2000, figuran en la lista. relativa al acceso a la actividad de las entidades de crédito y a su ejercicio (1),la Comisión debe elaborar y publicar una lista de La presente lista ha sido elaborada por la Comisión partiendo de todas las entidades de crédito autorizadas en los Estados las indicaciones proporcionadas por los Estados miembros. Al miembros. contrario del registro bancario existente en algunos Estados miembros,la lista no tiene alcance jurídico y el hecho de figurar en la misma no confiere ningún derecho. Si una entidad no La Comisión cumple,por decimonovena vez,esta misión aprobada figura en la misma por error,su situación jurídica no mediante la presente comunicación,en cuyo anexo se encuentra cambiará por ello. Si una entidad aprobada ha sido omitida por la relación de entidades. -
1000 12°3'0"E 12°4'0"E 12°5'0"E 12°6'0"E 12°7'0"E 12°8'0"E 12°9'0"E 12°10'0"E 12°11'0"E 12°12'0"E
279000 280500 282000 283500 285000 286500 288000 289500 291000 12°3'0"E 12°4'0"E 12°5'0"E 12°6'0"E 12°7'0"E 12°8'0"E 12°9'0"E 12°10'0"E 12°11'0"E 12°12'0"E GLIDE number: N/A Activation ID: EMSR-044 ^ Product N.: 03Rosenheim, v1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 3 5 5 Rosenheim, GERMANY Rinsersee Flood - 03/06/2013 Reference Map - Overview ! ^ Production date: 04/06/2013 N " Mintsberg ^ Niederbayern 0 ' 4 Baltic 5 North ° Sea 7 SeaInn 4 Erding Muhldorf München Altotting Hofstätter a. Inn Netherlands Berlin h r c !.a Poland Is ^ ^ ba See Innviertel r Ebersberg ge Oberosterreich N Belgium Germany n " S 0 a A ' 4 Munchen, lz n 5 a ° Czech ch g 7 i 4 Landkreis Oberbayern Republic A France Salzburg Germany Austria h c Switzerland 0 0 0 ! a 0 Traunstein 5 Deutelhausen 5 8 b 8 0 r 0 3 3 Salzburg 5 e 5 Rosenheim, !. ! h m Mariä Himmelfahrt c Miesbach Landkreis a G ^ z Großkarolinenfeld l ra m a f Freiwillige Feuerwehr S in a g Prutting e H ! Berc htes gad ener r Pfaffenhofen am Inn r 9 a Land S t I s Tirol Pinzgau-Pongau ra ß Tiroler Ro e tt 9 Unterland Austria N " 0 ' 3 5 ° 7 4 Cartographic Information ße ra 1:20000 Full color ISO A1, low resolution (100 dpi) St. St r N e " 0 ' 0 0 im 3 5 0 0.5 1 2 0 0 ^ Leonhard e e ° 0 h 0 h 7 4 7 c ß n 7 km 0 a St.