J. Jpn. Bot. 87: 326–353 (2012)

Siebold and Zuccarini’s Type Specimens and Original Materials from Japan, Part 1. Gymnosperms

a, b c Shinobu Akiyama *, Gerard Thijsse , Hans Joachim Esser , d and Hideaki Ohba

a Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, 4-1-1, Amakubo, Tsukuba, 305-0005 JAPAN; b Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Leiden University Branch, P. O. Box 9514, The NETHERLANDS; c Botanische Staatssammlung München, Menzinger Straße 67, D-80638 München, GERMANY; d Department of Botany, the University Museum, the University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033 JAPAN * Corresponding author: [email protected]

(Received on May 12, 2012)

In the late 19th Century Siebold and Zuccarini published many new taxa based on Japanese mostly collected by Siebold, Japanese botanists, and his assistant (later successor) Bürger. Although Siebold and Zuccarini’s contribution to the Japanese flora is great, the modern type specimen concept on which a name is based had not been developed. To stabilize the taxonomy of the plants described by Siebold and Zuccarini, lectotypes for the names they proposed are herein designated. Part 1 deals with the Gymnosperms.

Key words: Japanese flora, lectotypification, Siebold collections, Zuccarini.

In the late 19th Century Siebold and botanists, and his successors, here called Zuccarini proposed many new taxa based on the Siebold collection of Japanese plants, Japanese plants that were collected mostly by were deposited in the Rijksherbarium of the Siebold, Japanese botanists, and his assistant Netherlands in Leiden, now the National (later successor) Bürger. Although Siebold and Herbarium of the Netherlands (L). Most of Zuccarini’s contribution to the Japanese flora is the descriptions of the new taxa described by great, the modern type specimen concept had Siebold and Zuccarini after 1841 were prepared not been developed. To complicate matters, they primarily by Zuccarini in Munich, not in Leiden. rarely cited specimens in the protologues of It is unlikely that Zuccarini examined all of their new taxa. It is difficult to be sure that the the Siebold collections; he may have studied specimens were the only elements they used. only a limited number of them. An invoice of a Because of these circumstances, very few of loan of Siebold’s collection to Zuccarini dated their names are interpreted as being holotypes October 1841 is in the archives of the National or syntypes. Some of the names they proposed Herbarium Netherlands. It is not certain that have been lectotypified, but many others remain. these specimens were returned to Leiden or not. The collections made by Siebold, Japanese We will write the details in Part 2. Besides these

—326— October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 327

gymnosperms, our intent is to lectotypify the plants described from Japan described by Siebold and Zuccarini. Further remarks on the circumstances and procedures will be included where clarifications are needed. In the following list we include invalid and illegitimate names proposed by Siebold, Zuccarini and others. We also include nomenclatorially significant names published solely by Siebold or Zuccarini, and others. The specimens studied by Siebold and Zuccarini are mainly in the National Herbarium Netherlands, Leiden (L), and the Botanische Staatssammlung, München (M). Duplicates of the Siebold collections were sent to other Herbaria by Blume, Miquel and others. Siebold's Fig. 1. Labels determined by Siebold. Juniperus procumbens Sieb. (upper), Cryptomeria Japonica private collection of herbarium specimens is now var. Sinensis (middle) and Abies momi (lower). in the Makino Herbarium, Tokyo Metropolitan University (MAK); his illustrations are in the Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences, specimens, Zuccarini also bought specimens of St. Petersburg. For this study we examined Japanese plants, which may be in the Botanische Siebold’s collections in the following herbaria: Staatssammlung München (M). L, M, MAK, and the Herbarium, the University In Leiden, the original material is kept in the Museum, the University of Tokyo (TI). Herbarium Japonicum Generale. The Herbarium We determine the original material according contains specimens in the following four to the following criteria: categories: 1. Specimen cited in protologue; 1) material collected by Siebold; 2. Specimen identified by Siebold with latin 2) material donated by Japanese botanists, name written by Siebold (Fig. 1, upper and (Keiske [Itô Keisuke], Sugerok [Mizutani middle) or Zuccarini (Fig. 2, upper and lower); Sukeroku], Joan [Udagawa Yôan], and others); 2b. Duplicates and possible duplicates of the 3) material collected by Bürger; specimens of Category 2; 4) material collected by Mohnike, Textor, In Munich, for each new name there is Pierot, and others, which arrived at Leiden after a single specimen with the determination in the publication of Siebold and Zuccarini's works Zuccarini’s hand on labels headed “Herbarium (1846). Zuccarinii” (Fig. 2, upper), plus several (one Specimens in category 4 are ruled out of to three) specimens without his handwriting consideration. Specimens in categories 1, 2, and and with labels with the heading “HERB. 3 need to be studied to determine if they were ZUCCARINII, HERBARIUM REGIUM used in the descriptions of the new taxa. MONACENSE, Herbar. Univ. Ludeo. In Munich, the original material is not Maximil.” (Fig. 2, middle). The latter specimens separate, but is sorted in species folders in the are very probably duplicates of the former. On general collection. All Siebold collections are some specimens the probable original label with currently being databased. “Herbarium Zuccarinii” was cut and pasted on a Beginning with this paper dealing with label headed “Herb. Zuccarinii. HERBARIUM 328 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月

4. Specimens with determination or notes by Japanese botanists; 5. Specimens resembling the illustrations on plates published in Flora Japonica; 5b. Possible duplicates of the specimens of Category 5; 6. Specimens well representing the original descriptions, particularly those of the reproductive organs.

CYCADACEAE Cycas L. 1) Cycas revoluta Thunb. β. prolifera Siebold & Zucc. in Abh. Math.-Phys. Cl. Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 4(3): 236 (1846). Present treatment: Cycas revoluta Thunb. in Verh. Holl. Maatsch. Weetensch. 20: 424, 426 (1782); in Nova Acta Regiae Soc. Sci. Upsal. 4: 40 (1783); in Murray, Syst. Veg., ed. 14: 926 (1784); Fl. Jap.: 229 (1784) [var. revoluta]. Japanese name: Sotetsu [for C. revoluta var. revoluta]. Lectotype (designated here): Illustration by Keiga Kawahara in the Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg (Ohba et al. [1994] Cat. no. 3) (Fig. 3). Original material: Illustration in the Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Fig. 2. Labels of Zuccarini’s collection. A label Petersbourg (Ohba et al. [1994] Cat. no. 4). headed “Herbarium Zuccarinii” with Zuccarini’s No specimen representing the proliferating determination “Abies firma S. & Z.” (upper); a label form was found. We therefore select the headed “HERB. ZUCCARINII,” “HERBARIUM illustration as the lectotype according to the REGIUM MONACENSE,” and “Herbar. Univ. Ludov. Maximil.,” without Zuccarini’s determination ICBN, Art. 9.10. The illustration corresponds (middle); a label cut and pasted on a label headed well with the original description. In L there is a “HERB. ZUCCARINII,” “HERBARIUM REGIUM specimen of C. revoluta, L 0175879, collected MONACENSE,” and “Herbar. Univ. Ludov. and determined by Siebold, and representing Maximil.,” with Zuccarini’s determination “Pinus parviflora S. & Z.” Cycas revoluta var. prolifera in de Kort (2000). In M there is a specimen of C. revoluta, M 0153392, determined by Zuccarini. Both REGIOUM MONACENSE, Herbar. Univ. specimens consist of only female sporophylls; it Ludov. Maximil.” (Fig. 2, lower ), indicating that is uncertain whether they represent var. prolifera Zuccarini’s collection was later transferred to the or not. Botanische Staatssammlung München; 3. Specimens with Japanese names or notes by Siebold (Fig. 1, lower); October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 329

Pinaceae Original material: In Japonia legit Abies L. communicavit d. Siebold, Herb. Zuccarinii 2) Abies bifida Siebold & Zucc., Fl. Jap. (M 0120953) [Category 2b]. In Japonia legit 2: 18, t. 109 (1842); in Abh. Math.-Phys. Cl. communicavit d. Siebold, Herb. Zuccarinii (M Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 4(3): 235 (1846). 0120954) [Category 2b]. Japonia. S [Siebold] s.n. Present treatment: Abies firma Siebold & (L 0170190) with a slip written “Ad. 7.α Abies Zucc. Tômomi” by Siebold [Category 3]. Japonia. Japanese name: Momi; Saga momi (Siebold In monte Iwajama, S [Siebold] (L 0170189) and Zuccarini 1842). [Category 1]. [Japan] (MAK S1754) [Category Lectotype (designated here): Legit in 2]. Japonia & Communicavit de Siebold anno The specimen, L 0170190, has a slip with 1842, Herbarium Zuccarinii (M 0120952) with “Ad. 7.α Abies Tômomi;” L 0170189 has a small Zuccarini’s determination [Category 2] (Fig. 4). twisted paper on which is written “in monte Original material: Japonia. Hb. von Siebold Iwajama,” both in Siebold’s hand. The name s.n. (L 0170524) [Category 4, 5 (Siebold & “monte Iwajama” corresponds with “montagne Zucc., Fl. Jap. 2: t. 109)] (image in de Kort Iwaja près de Nagasaki” in Siebold's note for et al., 2000). Japonia. Hb. von Siebold s.n. (L Abies firma. 0170188) [Category 2, 4]. Japonia. Hb. Itoo[sic] Keiske ex Owari, no. 616 (L 0175707) [Category 4) Abies homolepis Siebold & Zucc., Fl. 4]. Japonia. S [Siebold] (L 0175885) [Category Jap. 2: 17, t. 108 (1842); in Abh. Math.-Phys. 3]. [Japan] (MAK S1744) [Category 2]. Cl. Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 4(3): 235 (1846). Farjon (1993) did not designate a lectotype Endl., Syn. Conif.: 101 (1847). for Abies bifida; he later (Farjon 1998) treated it Present treatment: Abies homolepis Siebold as a synonym of A. firma. & Zucc. Table 109 of Flora Japonica appears to be Japanese name: Urajiro-momi; Sjura momi based on specimen, L 0170524. (Siebold and Zuccarini 1842), ûra siro momi The specimens associated with the name (Siebold and Zuccarini 1842). Abies momi, or Momi, written by Siebold are all Lectotype (designated by Farjon 1993): A. bifida; those named Abies tomomi or Tômomi Legit in Japonia & Communicavit de Siebold are A. firma. We judge the specimens with anno 1842, Herbarium Zuccarinii (M 0120956) Sieboldʼs handwritten names, Abies momi or [Category 2] (Fig. 6). Momi, to be the original material of A. bifida. Original material: Japonia. S [Siebold] s.n. (L 0328605) [Category 3, 5 (Siebold & Zucc., Fl. 3) Abies firma Siebold & Zucc., Fl. Jap. Jap. 2: t. 108 I)]. Japonia. S [Sugerok Mizutani] 2: 15, t. 107 (1842); in Abh. Math.-Phys. Cl. no. 39 (L 0175717) [Category 4, 5 (Siebold & Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 4(3): 235 (1846). Zucc., Fl. Jap. 2: t. 108 II)]. Present treatment: Abies firma Siebold & Yamaguchi et al. (2003) identified the Zucc. specimens, L 0175708 and L 0175758, as Abies Japanese name: Momi; Tô momi (Siebold homolepis, probably according to Miquel's and Zuccarini 1842). identification, however L 0175708 is Picea Lectotype (designated by Farjon 1993): jezoensis (Siebold & Zucc.) Carrière var. Legit in Japonia et Communicavit de Siebold hondoensis (Mayr) Rehder and L 0175758 is anno 1842, Herbarium Zuccarinii (M 0120955) Abies veitchii Lindl. with Zuccarini’s determination [Category 2] (Fig. 5). 5) Abies jezoensis Siebold & Zucc., Fl. Jap. 330 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月

2: 19, t. 110 (1842); in Abh. Math.-Phys. Cl. Abies polita is validly published by Siebold Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 4(3): 235 (1846). and Zuccarini (1842) accompanied by a Present treatment: Picea jezoensis (Siebold & description and an illustration with analysis Zucc.) Carrière, Trait. Gén. Conifèr., 255 (1855). Table 111. Japanese name: Ezo-matsu; Jezo matsu Farjon (1990) wrote “Abies polita Siebold & (Siebold and Zuccarini 1842). Zucc. is a superfluous name for Linne’s species: Lectotype (designated by Farjon 1993): Pinus abies because they cited Pinus abies Japonia. Hb. von Siebold s.n. (L 0050745) Thunb. in synonymy.” However, Thunberg [Category 3, 5 (Siebold & Zucc., Fl. Jap. 2: t. in Flora Japonica (1784) never propose this 110)] (image in de Kort et al.) (Fig. 7). Japonia. (L name. “Pinus Abies Thunb. Fl. japon. p. 275” 0422646, isolectotype). in synonymy of Siebold and Zuccarini’s Abies polita is understood as “Pinus Abies auct. non L.: 6) Abies leptolepis Siebold & Zucc., Fl. Jap. Thunb., Fl. Jap. p. 275.” 2 : 12, t. 105 (1842); in Abh. Math.-Phys. Cl. Farjon (1993) designated the specimen, Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 4(3): 234 (1846). L 0050743, as the lectotype of Picea torano Present treatment: Larix kaempferi (Lamb.) (Siebold ex K. Koch) Koehne (≡ Abies torano Carrière, Fl. Serres Jard. Eur. (Ghent) 11: 97 Siebold ex K. Koch). The name Abies torano (1856) ≡ Pinus kaempferi Lamb., Descr. Pinus, Siebold ex K. Koch (1873) is an invalid name ed. 2: iv (1828). as pointed out by Schroeder and Bayer (1973) Japanese name: Kara-matsu; Rak jỏ sjô because Koch cited Abies polita Siebold (Siebold and Zuccarini 1842). & Zucc. in synonymy (see A. torano). The Lectotype (designated here): Japonia. Hb. lectotype specimen, Siebold s.n. L 0050743, von Siebold s.n. (L 0175886) [Category 3, 5 undoubtedly represents Abies polita Siebold (Siebold & Zucc., Fl. Jap. 2: t. 105)] (Fig. 8). & Zucc. Article 7.3 of the International Code Original material: Japonia. S [Siebold] s.n. (L of Botanical Nomenclature (2006) ruled that a 0175887) [Category 3, 4]. new name published as an avowed substitute Specimen, L 0144242, in the image by de (replacement name, nomen novum) for an older Kort et al. (2000) is a van Royen collection, not name is typified by the type of the older name. In one of Siebold’s collections. this case the situation is reversed, but we prefer to choose Farjon's lectotypification of A. torano, 7) Abies polita Siebold & Zucc., Fl. Jap. 2 : Siebold s.n. L 0050743, as the lectotype for A. 20, t. 111(1842); in Abh. Math.-Phys. Cl. Königl. polita. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 4(3): 235 (1846). Farjon (1990, 1993, 1998) regarded A. torano Present treatment: Picea polita (Siebold & Siebold ex K. Koch as a valid name. He (Farjon Zucc.) Carrière, Trait. Gén. Conifèr.: 256 (1855). 1993) initially did not treat A. polita Siebold Japanese name: Hari-momi, Bara-momi; & Zucc. and later regarded it as a synonym of Toranowo (Siebold and Zuccarini 1842). Picea torano (K. Koch) Koehne (Farjon 1998). Lectotype (designated here): Japonia, Owari. According to Article 11.4 of the ICBN (2006) his Hb. von Siebold s.n. (L 0050743) [Category 3, 4] treatment is incorrect. (image in de Kort et al.) (Fig. 9) . The lectotype of A. torano designated by Original material: Japonia. S [Siebold] s.n. (L Farjon (1993) is the lectotype of A. polita. 0175889) [Category 3, 4]. Japonia. S [Siebold] s.n. (L 0328609) [Category 3, 4]. Japonia. S 8) Abies torano Siebold [Syn. Pl. Oeconom.: [Siebold] s.n. (L 0328610) [Category 3, 4]. 12 (1830), nom. nud.] ex K. Koch, Dendrologie 2(2): 233 (1873), nom. illegit. October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 331

Present treatment: Picea polita (Siebold & Kort et al.). Japonia. Hb. von Siebold s.n. (L Zucc.) Carrière. 0102737) [Category 3, 4]. Japonia. S [Siebold] Japanese name: Hari-momi, Bara-momi. s.n. (L 0102738) [Category 3, 4]. [Japan] (MAK Lectotype (designated by Farjon 1993): S1755) [Category 2]. Japonia. Owari. Hb. von Siebold s.n. (L The specimen, L 0175891, is thought 0050743) [Category 3, 4] (image in de Kort et to be collected from the same tree with the al.) (Fig. 9) [also the lectotype of A. polita]. lectotype (M 0120957). The specimen has a Original material: same as A. polita. slip written: “ ヒメ ア ラ ゝ ギ [Hime-araragi]” As mentioned in Abies polita, A. torano in Japanese. “Hime-araragi” corresponds Siebold ex K. Koch is an invalid name. Abies with Abies tsuga. In a note for Abies tsuga in torano was first used by Siebold (1830) and later Flora Japonica Siebold wrote: Les botanists not published by Siebold and Zuccarini validly. du Japon confondent souvant le Tsuga avec, The specific epithet “torano” comes from its l'Araragi (Taxus cuspidata). De même l'Abies Japanese name, “Toranowo” (now spelled Araragi mentionnée dans notre Synopsis . “Torano-o”). In Siebold & Zuccarini’s Flora oeconomicarum n'est que le “Tsuga.” Japonica (1842) the Japanese name, “Toranowo” was cited as that of A. polita. Abies torano is Pinus L. considered to be treated as conspecific with A. 10) Pinus densiflora Siebold & Zucc., Fl. polita by them. Jap. 2: 22, t. 112 (1842); in Abh. Math.-Phys. Koch (1873) regarded A. torano Siebold Cl. Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 4(3): 235 (1846). as the earliset valid name for this species and Endl., Syn. Conif.: 172 (1847). described it in Germany with the citation Present treatment: Pinus densiflora Siebold of A. polita as a synonym. According to the & Zucc. present International Code of the Botanical Japanese name: Aka-matsu; Me matsu Nomenclature (2006) A. torano Siebold (1830) (Siebold and Zuccarini 1842), aka matsu (Siebold is invalid and A. torano Siebold ex K. Koch and Zuccarini 1842). (1873) is a superfluous name for A. polita. The Lectotype (designated by Farjon 1993): lectotype of this invalid name is included here Legit in Japonia et Communicavit de Siebold because it might be validated if the code would anno 1842, Herb. Zuccarinii (M 0120938) be changed. [Category 2] (Fig. 11). Original material: In Japonia legt. de Siebold, 9) Abies tsuga Siebold & Zucc., Fl. Jap. Herb. Zuccarinii (M 0120939) [Category 2b]. 2 : 14, t. 106 (1842); in Abh. Math.-Phys. Cl. Japonia. Hb. von Siebold, 22 April 1827 (L Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 4(3): 235 (1846). 0170192) [Category 3]. Japonia. [Siebold?] 22 Present treatment: Tsuga sieboldii Carrière, April 1827 (L 0101477) [Category 3]. Japonia. Trait. Gén. Conifèr., 186 (1855). Hb. von Siebold s.n. (L 0170194) [Category 3, Japanese name: Tsuga; Tsuga (Siebold and 4]. Siebold (L 0367346) [Category 5 (Siebold & Zuccarini 1842), Toga matsu (Siebold and Zucc., Fl. Jap. 2: t. 112)]. Zuccarini 1842). The illustration of branches with male cones Lectotype (designated by Farjon 1993): in Table 112 of Flora Japonica is considered to Legit in Japonia et Communicavit de Siebold be based on the specimen L 0367346. Because anno 1842, Herbarium Zuccarinii (M 0120957) this specimen, L 0367346, is the only one [Category 2] (Fig. 10). specimen with male cones. Original material: Japonia. S [Siebold] s.n. (L 0175891) [Category 2b] (image in de 11) Pinus koraiensis Siebold & Zucc., Fl. 332 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月

Jap. 2: 28, t. 116 (1842); in Abh. Math.-Phys. of C. dacryoides known, and it corresponds with Cl. Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 4(3): 235 (1846). the original description. Endl., Syn. Conif.: 140 (1847). Present treatment: Pinus koraiensis Siebold 14) Cryptomeria japonica (Thunb. ex L. f.) & Zucc. D. Don var. araucarioides Siebold in Miq., Fl. Japanese name: Chôsen-goyô; Wumi matsu Jap. 2: 52, t. 124b f. 2 & 3 (1870). (Siebold and Zuccarini 1842) . Present treatment: Cryptomeria japonica Lectotype (designated by Farjon 1993): (Thunb. ex L. f.) D. Don ‘Araucarioides’ Siebold & Zuccarini, Fl. Jap. 2: t. 116, f. 5–6 Japanese name: Enkô-sugi; Jenkosugi (1842). (Siebold 1870), Sarudesugi (Siebold 1870). Because no original material of Pinus Lectotype (designated here): Japonia. S. koraiensis is known, the choice of the [Kumakichi], 9 April 1827 (L 0102744, right illustration, Fl. Jap. 2: t. 116, f. 5 and 6, by Farjon hand branch) [Category 3, 5 (Siebold & Zucc., is logical. Fl. Jap. 2: t. 124b fig. 2 & 3)] (Fig. 14, right hand branch) . 12) Pinus parviflora Siebold & Zucc., Fl. Original material: Japonia. [Siebold s.n.] Jap. 2: 27, t. 115 (1842); in Abh. Math.-Phys. (MAK S1820) [Category 3]. Cl. Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 4(3): 235 (1846). Endl., Syn. Conif.: 138 (1847). 15) Cryptomeria japonica (Thunb. ex L. f.) Present treatment: Pinus parviflora Siebold D. Don var. lobbii Siebold in Miq., Fl. Jap. 2: 52 & Zucc. (1870), non Carrière (1855). Japanese name: Himekomatsu, Goyômatsu; Present treatment: Cryptomeria japonica Gojo no matsu (Siebold and Zuccarini 1842). (Thunb. ex L. f.) D. Don ‘Lobbii.’ Lectotype (designated by Farjon 1993): Japanese name: ? Japonia. Hb. von Siebold s.n. (L 0050744) Original material: Ex horto botanico [Category 5] (Fig. 12) (image in de Kort et al.). Bogoriensi, Javae uvi e Japonia recepta, ab Original material: Legit in Japonia & itineratore Lobb in Angliam introducta dicitur Communicavit de Siebold anno 1842, Herb. [not found]. Zuccarinii (M 0120941) [Category 2]. Japonia. Siebold’s name is a later homonym. Carrière S [Siebold] (L 0102802) [Category 2b]. [Japan] first published the name in Traité Général des (MAK S1738) [Category 2]. Conifères 154. 1855. According to Gordon (1858) it was introduced from the Dutch botanic gardens at Batavia by one of the Lobbs. Taxodiaceae Cryptomeria D. Don 16) Cryptomeria japonica (Thunb. ex L. f.) 13) Cryptomeria dacryoides Siebold in Miq., D. Don var. nana Fortune ex Siebold in Miq., Fl. Jap. 2: 53 (1870). Fl. Jap. 2: 52 (1870), non Gordon (1858). Present treatment: Cryptomeria japonica Present treatment: Cryptomeria japonica (Thunb. ex L. f.) D. Don ’Dacryoides.' (Thunb. ex L. f.) D. Don ‘Nana.’ Japanese name: Sen-nin-sugi. Synonym: C. nana Lindl. & Gord. in J. Lectotype (designated here): [Japan]. v. Hort. Soc. 5: 208 (1850). C. japonica var. nana Siebold [in] 1862 (M 0120964) [Category 6] Knight, Syn. .: 22 (1850), nom. nud. (Fig. 13). Japanese name: ? We selected specimen, M 0120964, as the Original material: China boreali e Clariss. lectotype because it is the only Siebold specimen Fortune in Angliam intoroducta [not found]. October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 333

Variety nana was not a name proposed Japanese name: ? by Siebold because it was already published Original material: Sponte crescit in montium by Gordon in “The Pinetum” (1858, p. 54) as jugis “Tara” inque hortis quoque colitur [not “Cryptomeria Japonica nana, Fortune.” The found]. origin of the variety was not mentioned by Gordon (1858). 21) Cryptomeria japonica (Thunb. ex D. Don) D. Don var. uncinata Siebold in Miq., Fl. 17) Cryptomeria japonica (Thunb. ex L. f.) Jap. 2: 52, t. 124b f. 5 (1870). D. Don var. pygmaea Siebold in Miq., Fl. Jap. 2: Present treatment: Cryptomeria japonica 53 (1870). (Thunb. ex L. f.) D. Don cultivar? Present treatment: Cryptomeria japonica Japanese name: Jeisan-sugi (Siebold 1870). (Thunb. ex L. f.) D. Don ‘Pygmaea.’ Lectotype (designated here): Siebold & Japanese name: ? Zuccarini, Fl. Jap. 2: t. 124 f. 5 (1870). Lectotype (designated here): Plantae culta Original material: Vidi siccatum ramulum in hort Arbusculus ... in Japonia. (MAK S1821) in Herbario botanophili japonici; singularem [Category 1] (Fig. 15) (image in Kato et al. haec provenire varietatem in monte Jeisan prope 2005). urbem Mijako [not found].

18) Cryptomeria japonica (Thunb. ex L. f.) Cupressaceae D. Don var. sinensis Siebold in Miq., Fl. Jap. 2: Juniperus L. 52 (1870). 22) Juniperus chinensis L. var. procumbens Present treatment: Cryptomeria japonica [(Siebold, nom. nud., pro species)] Endl., Syn. (Thunb. ex L. f.) D. Don ‘Sinensis.’ Conif.: 21 (1847). Japanese name: ? Synonym: Juniperus procumbens [Siebold Lectotype (designated here): Japonia. in Jaarb. Kon. Ned. Maatsch. Tuinb. 1844: 31 S. [Siebold] s.n. (L 0423386, lower branch) (1844), as Siebold & Zucc., nom. nud.; Siebold [Category 2] (Fig. 16). & Zucc. in Abh. Math.-Phys. Cl. Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 4(3): 234 (1846), nom. nud.; Endl., 19) Cryptomeria japonica (Thunb. ex L. f.) Syn. Conif.: 21 (1847), pro syn.] (Endl.) Miq., D. Don var. spiralis Siebold in Miq., Fl. Jap. 2: Fl. Jap. 2: 59, t. 127 fig. III (1870), as “Siebold 52, t. 124b f. 4 (1870). in Annuaire de la Société Roy. pour l'encour. de Present treatment: Cryptomeria japonica l'horticulture dans les Pays Bas. 1844 p. 31.” (Thunb. ex L. f.) D. Don ‘Spiralis.’ Present treatment: Juniperus procumbens Japanese name: Yore-sugi; Hôbô-sugi (Endl.) Miq. (Siebold 1870). Japanese name: Hai-byakushin; Hai Bijah Lectotype (designated here): Japonia. S. Kusin (Miquel 1870), Bai-bi-jak’sin (Miquel [Siebold] s.n. (L 0102744, middle branch) 1870). [Category 5 (Siebold & Zucc., Fl. Jap. 2: t. 124b Lectotype (designated by Farjon 2005): fig. 4)] (Fig. 14, middle branch). [Japonia] Siebold s.n. [ex Herb. Bentham 1854 (right hand specimen only)] (K, not seen). 20) Cryptomeria japonica (Thunb. ex L. f.) Original material: Communicavit Bot. D. Don var. tara Siebold in Miq., Fl. Jap. 2: 53 japon. ac amicus Ninomija Kesak’ Nagasaki (L (1870). 0325536) [Category 2]. Communicavit. Bot. Present treatment: Cryptomeria japonica japon. Kadsuragawa archiater Taikuni Jedo (Thunb. ex L. f.) D. Don cultivar? (L 0325537, left hand branch) [Category 2, 5, 334 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月

(Siebold & Zucc., Fl. Jap. 2: t. 127 fig. III)] (Fig. 23) Juniperus rigida Siebold & Zucc., Fl. 17). No. 484 Hort. Acclimat. Sieboldii. Planta Jap. 2: t. 125 (1844); in Abh. Math.-Phys. Cl. culta 18 introducta. ex Japonia (L 0325545) Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 4(3): 233 (1846). [Category 2]. Legit v. S. cultam ad Nagasaki. Endl., Syn. Conif.: 17 (1847). Miq., Prolus.: 331 Japonia. (L 0325546) [Category 2]. (1879); Fl. Jap. 2: 56 (1870). The name Juniperus procumbens was Present treatment: Juniperus rigida Siebold invalidly published by Siebold in 1844 and by & Zucc. Siebold and Zuccarini in 1845. Siebold (1844) Japanese name: Nezu; Muro (Miquel 1870), listed the name with comments “Fl. jap. Tab. Nezu (Miquel 1870), Sonoro matz (Miquel 126,” but did not place Table 126 itself in the 1870). article. In the published Flora Japonica the Lectotype (designated by Farjon 2005): Legit plants illustrated in Tables 126 and 127 figs. in Japoniae monte Hakone & Communicavit de I, II, IV are J. chinensis; Table 127 fig. III is J. Siebold anno 1842, Herbarium Zuccarinii, Herb. procumbens. Dr. Bürger s.n. (M 0120966) [Category 2] (Fig. Endlicher (1847) cited “Juniperus 18). procumbens Siebold in Annuaire de la Societ. Original material: [Japan] Herbar de Siebold d'horticult. des Pays-bas. 1844. p. 31” [Jaarb. coll. 1829 (L 0102748) [Category 2]. Japonia. Kon. Ned. Maatsch. Tuinb. 1844: 31 (1844)] Legit v. S. [Siebold] ad portum Mino [in] 1826 in synonymy of J. chinensis var. procumbens. (L 0102749) [Category 2]. [Japan] [Siebold s.n.] Endlicher did not cite a specimen in the (L 0102750) [Category 3]. [Japan. e montibus protologue and wrote that J. chinensis var. Hakone hortum amici mei Sige Denosin patris procumbens is distributed in Korea. No Nagasaki truus plantata est] [Siebold s.n.] (MAK specimens of J. procumbens from Korea at the S1798) [Category 2, 3]. [Japan] Communicavit time of Siebold and Zuccarini are in L or M. Bot. Japon. Ito Keiske e Provincia Owari in In L there are four specimens of Juniperus Insul Nippon (L 0042880) [Category 2, 3]. procumbens from Japan determined by Siebold [Japan] Herbarium Ito Keiske vol. 3, no. 130 (L) (L 0325536, 0325537, 0325545, and 0325546) [Category 2b] . which we consider to be original material. Two sheets are in M (M 0120965, M 0120969), Retinispora Siebold & Zucc. but they lack determinations by Siebold and 24) Retinispora obtusa Siebold & Zucc., Fl. Zuccarini. MAK S1807 is also considered to be Jap. 2: 38, t. 121 (1844); in Abh. Math.-Phys. Cl. original material. Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 4(3): 234 (1846). When J. chinensis var. procumbens was Present treatment: Chamaecyparis obtusa published, Endlicher was a professor and (Siebold & Zucc.) Siebold & Zucc. ex Endl., director of the Botanical Garden of Vienna. We Syn. Conif.: 63 (1847). are not sure that he examined specimens of J. Japanese name: Hinoki; Hinoki (Siebold and procumbens. Zuccarini 1844). Farjon (2005) designated the Siebold Lectotype (designated here): Legit in collection in K [Japonia. P. F. von Siebold s.n., Japonia et Communicavit Siebold anno 1842, ex Herb. Bentham 1854 (right hand specimen Herb. Zuccarinii (M 0120958) [Category 2] (Fig. only)] as the lectotype. He did not give a 19). reason for selecting this specimen. We have Original material: [Japonia]: S. [Siebold] not examined the specimen at K and cannot s.n. (L 0102735, upper left branch) [Category comment on its designation. 3]. Japonia. Sieb.[Siebold] s.n. (L 0423372) [Category 2]. [Japan] (MAK S1769) [Category 2]. October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 335

When Siebold and Zuccarini published Endl. var. squarrosa (Siebold & Zucc.) Masters Retinispora obtusa they did not cite specimens in J. Linn. Soc. 18: 490 (1881). or a locality. Although Farjon (2005) cited the Japanese name: Himuro; Shinobu hiba holotype as “L?, n.v.” and “isotype (K),” no (Siebold and Zuccarini 1844). holotype exists. A lectotype should be selected Lectotype (designated here): Legit in from the original material. In L and M are Japonia et Communicavit de Siebold anno 1842, original specimens determined by Siebold Herbarium Zuccarinii (M 0120962) [Category 2] and Zuccarini. We here designate specimen M (Fig. 21). 0120958 as the lectotype. The upper left branch Original material: Legit Dr Siebold in of L 0102735 appears to be the material that was Japonia Communicavit Prof. Zuccarini anno used for the main illustration of Table 121 in 1843, Herb. Zuccarinii (M 0120963) [Category Flora Japonica. 2b]. Japonia. S. [Siebold] s.n. (L 0423359, upper branch) [Category 3]. Japonia. [Siebold s.n.] (L 25) Retinispora pisifera Siebold & Zucc., Fl. 0423366) [Category 3]. Japonia. S.[Siebold] Jap. 2: 39, t. 122 (1844); in Abh. Math.-Phys. Cl. s.n. (L 0423367, except upper right branch) Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 4(3): 234 (1846). [Category 3]. [Japan] (MAK S1766) [Category Present treatment: Chamaecyparis pisifera 2]. Japonia. Planta cult in Hortum Desima (Siebold & Zucc.) Siebold & Zucc. ex Endl., introducta 1824 (MAK S1847) [Category 2]. Syn. Conif.: 64 (1847). 26b) Retinispora squarrosa Siebold & Zucc. Japanese name: Sawara; Sawara (Siebold var. culta foliis albo-variegatis Siebold & Zucc., and Zuccarini 1844). Fl. Jap. 2: 40(1844), nom. illegit. Lectotype (designated here): In Japonia legit Original material: Japonia. S. [Siebold] s.n. (L communicavit d. Siebold, Herb. Zuccarinii (M 0423367, upper right hand branch) [Category 2] 0120961) [Category 2b] (Fig. 20). (Fig. 22). Original material: Legit in Japonia et Communicavit de Siebold anno 1842, Herb. Zuccarinii (M 0120959) [Category 2]. In L. Japonia legit communicavit d. Siebold, ex Herb. 27) Podocarpus japonicus Hort. Bogor. ex Zuccarinii (M 0120960) [Category 2b]. Japonia. Siebold [in Jaarb. Kon. Ned. Maatsch. Tuinb. Ito Keiske 553 (L 0102725, both branches) 1844: 35 (1844), nom. nud.] ex Endl., Syn. [Category 3]. [Japan] (MAK S0317, 1767) Conif.: 217 (1847). [Category 2]. Present treatment: Podocarpus macrophyllus When Siebold and Zuccarini published (Thunb.) Sweet, Hort. Sub. Lond.: 211 (1818). Retinispora pisifera they did not cite specimens Japanese name: Rakan-maki. or a locality. Although Farjon (2005) cited the Lectotype (designated here): Planta culta, holotype as “L?, n.v.” and “isotype (K),” there in Hortum Bogor. Java introducta [Siebold s.n.] is no holotype. A lectotype must be selected (MAK S1831, left hand branch) [Category 2] from the original material. In L and M there are (Fig. 23). original specimens determined by Siebold and Zuccarini. 28) Podocarpus koraianus Siebold [in Jaarb. Kon. Ned. Maatsch. Tuinb. 1844: 35 (1844), 26) Retinispora squarrosa Siebold & Zucc., nom. nud., as “coraianus”] ex Endl., Syn. Fl. Jap. 2: 40, t. 123 (1844); in Abh. Math.-Phys. Conif.: 217 (1847), as “koraiana.” Cl. Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 4(3): 234 (1846). Present treatment: Cephalotaxus harringtonia Present treatment: Chamaecyparis pisifera (Knight ex J. Forbes) K. Koch f. fastigiata 336 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月

(Carrière) Rehd. [Cephalotaxaceae]. 1839). This description of the leaf apex does not Japanese name: Chôsen-maki. agree with P. macrophyllus var. (β.) maki Siebold Lectotype (designated here): [Japonia. & Zucc. ex Endl., nor with the illustration in Siebold s.n.] (L 0326208) [Category 2] (Fig. 24). Table 134 of Flora Japonica. Original material: Japonia. S [Siebold] s.n. (L Note: Podocarpus macrophyllus var. maki 0328603) [Category 2, 3]. Siebold & Zucc. [in Siebold in Jaarb. Kon. Ned. Original material (for P. coraianus Siebold, Maatsch. Tuinb. 1844: 35 (1844), nom. nud.]. nom. nud.): Japonia. Planta culta in hortis Miq., Fl. Jap. 2: 71, t. 134 (1870). [Siebold s.n.] (MAK S1845) [Category 2, 3]. The authorship and publication date for Japonia. Planta culta in H. Accl. anno 1830 Siebold and Zuccarini’s Flora Japonica are introducta [Siebold] no. 489 (MAK S1884, part still confused in the literature (Koidzumi 1933, [excluding a branch of Podocarpus]) [Category Stafleu and Cowan 1985). Siebold and Zuccarini 2]. [Japan] (MAK S1736) [Category 2]. published parts of their Flora Japonica in 1826– 44. After that Miquel published the remaining 29) Podocarpus macrophyllus (Thunb.) part of Siebold and Zuccariniʼs Flora Japonica Sweet var. maki Siebold & Zucc. ex Endl., Syn. in 1870. Conif.: 216 (1847), as “β. Maki.”. Variety maki Siebold & Zucc. was published Present treatment: Podocarpus macrophyllus in 1870 by Miquel, though the illustration of (Thunb.) Sweet. Table 134 was prepared at least in 1844 (see Japanese name: Rakan-maki. Siebold 1844). According to Miquel (1870) Type: The type of Taxus macrophyllus Siebold and Zuccariniʼs var. maki, which is Thunb. (see Akiyama and Ohba 2012). illustrated in Flora Japonica, Tab. 134, was In his Naamlijst (1844) Siebold cited only the distinguished from Podocarpus macrophyllus name, var. maki Sieb. & Zucc. under Podocarpus var. macrophyllus by having short lanceolate macrophyllus Wall. and at the time unpublished leaves with a slightly obtuse apex, which are reference “Fl. jap. Tab. 134.” So that Siebold smaller and narrower than in var. macrophyllus, and Zuccarini’s name is invalid because it and erect, dense branches. Siebold (in Miquel lacks both a description and an illustration, and 1870) wrote that var. maki in Japan was also a reference to a previously and effectively known only as an ornamental plant and said published description or diagnosis. to be introduced from China. De Laubenfels When Endlicher published Podocarpus (1985) treated var. maki Siebold & Zucc. as macrophylla[sic]β.[= var.] maki (1847), he a synonym of Podocarpus chinensis (Roxb.) provided the description, “humilior ramis erectis Wall. ex Forbes [in Pinet. Woburn.: 212 (1839)], densis, foliis minoribus angustioribus,” and cited specifically separated from P. macrophyllus Siebold & Zuccarini’s Flora Japonica t. 134, (Thunb.) Sweet. De Laubenfels added and also two validly published names, “Taxus Podocarpus makoyi Blume to the synonymy of macrophylla Thunb.” and “Taxus Makaya Podocarpus chinensis. The original materials of [sic] Pinet. Woburn. 218,” and an invalid Blumeʼs P. makoyi fall in the variation range of name, “Podocarpus Makoyi Hort. Lovan” in P. macrophyllus (Akiyama and Ohba 2012). The synonymy. Therefore, β. [var.] maki is typified epithet, makoya or makoyi, used by Hort. Lovan, by the type of T. macrophylla (Akiyama Forbes, and Blume, derives from the name of and Ohba 2012). According to the original Belgian horticulturist, Lambert Jacob-Makoy description, Taxus Makoya has leaves “which (1790–1873). The relationship to P. chinensis is vary in length, from an inch to an inch and a uncertain. half, and are terminated by a sharp point” (Forbes Table 134 of Flora Japonica shows October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 337 two branches. The left hand branch has five Zucc., nom. nud.). According to its protologue seeds and the right hand branch is sterile. No Podocarpus maki is a horticultural form of original specimen with female cones or seeds Podocarpus with yellow variegated leaves, i.e., is found in L, M, MAK or TI. A drawing by foliis aureo striatis while P. macrophyllus var. Keiga Kawahara in St. Petersburg (Kimura maki illustrated in Table 134 shows green (not and Grubov [1994] Color Plate 206; Ohba et yellow variegated) leaves. al. [1994] Cat. no. 60) is considered to be the An illustration by Tokoku Shimizu (Kimura original of Table 134. It consists of a branch and Grubov 1994, 62. Nageia nagi (Thunb. with 3 seeds and the enlarged figures of a seed in Murray) Thum[sic]b. and Podocarpus and its longitudinal section. A specimen in M, M macrophyllus (Thunb. in Murray) Sweet/ 0120942, with a label written “in Japonia legt. Podocarpaceae, p. 80) shows five branches. Siebold, Herb. Zuccarinii” agrees well with the The upper left hand branch with yellow lined posture of the branches and shape of the leaves and yellow leaves agrees well Siebold and in the illustrations in Table 134. In MAK there Zuccariniʼs Podocarpus maki. are two specimens, MAK S1828 and 1829, Podocarpus maki was not mentioned in de with Siebold's determination “Podocarpus Kort et al. (2000). macrophylla varietas culta Maki.” As mentioned above the correct author of 30b) Podocarpus maki Siebold & Zucc. Podocarpus macrophyllus var. maki is “Siebold in Abh. Math.-Phys. Cl. Königl. Bayer. Akad. & Zucc. ex Endl.” and P. macrophyllus var. maki Wiss. 4(3): 232 (1846), non Siebold & Zucc. is typified by the type of T. macrophylla Thunb. (1845). (≡ Podocarpus macrophyllus (Thunb.) Sweet). Present treatment: Podocarpus macrophyllus But the specimens, M 0120942 (Fig. 25), MAK (Thunb.) Sweet f. spontaneus H. Ohba & S. S1828, MAK S1829, Keiga's drawing, and Table Akiyama in Bull. Natn. Mus. Nat. Sci., ser. B 38: 134 in Flora Japonica are the original materials (2012, in press). for Siebold and Zuccarini’s original recognition Japanese name: Inu-maki. of Podocarpus macrophyllus var. maki. Type: Kämpfer s.n. (25. 1 in Herb. Sloane 211, BM). 30) Podocarpus maki Siebold & Zucc. in Siebold and Zuccarini (1846) published Jaarb. Kon. Ned. Maatsch. Tuinb. 1845: 67 Podocarpus maki with citation, “Ken Sin it. Sen (1845), with short Latin description, “v. fol. Bakv vulgo Inu Maki Kämpfer l. c. [Amoen. aureo striat.” (the table of Fl. Jap. was not cited). p. 780].” The reference given by Siebold and Present treatment: Podocarpus macrophyllus Zuccarini satisfied the requirement for valid (Thunb.) Sweet ʽKifu.ʼ publication of “Podocarpus maki Siebold Japanese name: Kifu-maki, Takamuro-kifu- & Zucc.” (ICBN Art. 32.1). So Podocarpus nanban-maki. maki Siebold & Zucc. was validly published Lectotype (here designated): Illustration (the accompanied by a reference to a previously and upper left hand branch) by Tokoku Shimizu in effectively published description, i.e., Kämpfer the Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences, (1712). But this name, P. maki, is a later St. Petersburg (Ohba et al. [1994] Cat. no. 62) homonym of Siebold and Zuccarini's P. maki (Fig. 26 upper left hand figure). (1845). In the same paper Tables 133 and 134 of Original material: Not found. Flora Japonica (at that time unpublished) were Podocarpus maki Siebold & Zucc. is a cited in P. macrophylla. different taxon from P. macrophyllus var. maki 31) Podocarpus thunbergii Siebold, Syn. Pl. Siebold & Zucc. ex Endl. (and also Siebold & Oeconom.: mantissa (1830), nom. nud. 338 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月

Present treatment: Podocarpus macrophyllus handwriting, M 0120945 is a only one with (Thunb.) Sweet, Hort. Sub. Lond.: 211 (1818). reproductive organs and agrees well with Japanese name: Rakan-maki. the original description, particularly of the This is an alternative name for Taxus reproductive organs. macrophylla Thunb. 33) Cephalotaxus pedunculata Siebold & Cephalotaxaceae Zucc. [in Abh. Math.-Phys. Cl. Königl. Bayer. Cephalotaxus Siebold & Zucc. ex Enfl. Akad. Wiss. 4(3): 232 (1846), nom. nud.] ex 32) Cephalotaxus drupacea Siebold & Zucc. Endl., Syn. Conifer.: 238 (1847), nom. illeg. [in Abh. Math.-Phys. Cl. Königl. Bayer. Akad. [nom. superfl.]. Miq., Fl. Jap.2 : 67, t. 132 (1870). Wiss. 4(3): 232 (1846), nom. nud.] ex Endl., Present treatment: Cephalotaxus harringtonia Syn. Conifer.: 239 (1847). Miq., Fl. Jap. 2: 66, t. (Knight ex J. Forbes) K. Koch, Dendrologie 130, 131 (1870). 2(2): 102 (1873) [var. harringtonia]. Present treatment: Cephalotaxus harringtonia Japanese name: Inu-gaya; Inu Kaja (Miquel (Knight ex J. Forbes) K. Koch, Dendrologie 1870), Bebo Kaja (Miquel 1870), De bo gaja, 2(2): 102 (1873) [var. harringtonia]. Kja Raboku (Miquel 1870), Mominoki (Miquel Japanese name: Inu-gaya; Inu Kaja (Miquel 1870). 1870), Bebo Kaja (Miquel 1870), De bo gaja, Type: The type of Taxus harringtonia. In the Kja Raboku (Miquel 1870), Mominoki (Miquel protologue, Endlicher cited Taxus harringtonia 1870). Knight ex J. Forbes (Pinet. Woburn.: 217, t. 63, Lectotype (designated here): In Japonia 1839) in synonymy. legt. de Siebold. Herb. Zuccarinii (M 0120945) Original material [for C. pedunculata Siebold [Category 5 (Siebold & Zucc., Fl. Jap. 2: t. 130)] & Zucc. in Abh. Math.-Phys. Cl. Königl. Bayer. (Fig. 27). Akad. Wiss. 4(3): 232 (1846), nom. nud.]: Original material: Legit Dr Siebold in Japonia. Herb. v. Siebold s.n. (L 0175883) Japonia Communicavit Prof. Zuccarini anno [Category 2, 3] . 1843, Herb. Zuccarinii (M 0120943) [Category Cephalotaxus pedunculata is a superfluous 5b]. In Japonia legt. de Siebold, Herb. Zuccarinii name for C. harringtonia, although it is treated (M 0120944) [Category 5b]. [Japonia] S. as a synonym of C. harringtonia in de Kort et al. [Siebold] s.n. [the right hand branch with a slip (2000). written “Kumakichi”] (L 0175884) [Category 3] (image in de Kort et al.). 34) Cephalotaxus tardiva Siebold ex Endl., Original material [for Cephalotaxus Syn. Conifer.: 239 (1847). drupacea Siebold & Zucc., nom. nud.] [Japan] Present treatment: ?Taxus cuspidata Siebold (MAK S1823, 1881) [Category 2]. & Zucc. var. nana [Hort. ex] Rehder in L. H. Japonia. ad Nagasaki 1829, v. S [Siebold] s.n. Bailey, Cycl. Amer. Hort.: 1773 (1902). (MAK S1867) [Category 2]. Japonia. in itinere Japanese name: ?Kyaraboku. ad Jedo 1826, v. S.[Siebold] s.n. (MAK S1865) Type: Not found. [Category 2]. Original material: Not found. When Endlicher described C. drupacea, Spjut (2007) did not treat this name in his he cited no specimens and wrote “Habitat in paper. Japonia, prope Nagasaki culta et spontanea, in montibus usque ad 2000' elevationem.” 35) Cephalotaxus umbraculifera Siebold ex Although the three specimens in M, including Endl., Syn. Conifer.: 239 (1847). the lectotype, lack Zuccarini’s and Siebold’s Present treatment: Taxus cuspidata Siebold October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 339

& Zucc. var. nana [Hort. ex] Rehder in L. H. Wissenschaften, vol. 3, pp. 751–805 and table Bailey, Cycl. Amer. Hort.: 1773 (1902). 1–5 (1843). Japanese name: Kyaraboku. Neotype (designated by Spjut 2007): We greatly appreciate Dr. David E. Bouford, Illustration in Makino, Illus. Fl. Nippon, fig. the Harvard University Herbaria, for critical 2730 (1931). Epitype (designated by Spjut reading the manuscript. We express our 2007): Japan. Honshu: Hyogo Pref., Mt. appreciation to the directors of the herbaria Hyonosen (Muroi 30, 30 Aug. 1948, A). mentioned in the introduction for permitting us Original material: Not found. to study their valuable collections. This study was partly supported by the Grants-in-Aids for Taxaceae Scientific Research of the Japan Society for the Taxus L. Promotion of Science (nos. 13571040; 16401036 36) Taxus cuspidata Siebold & Zucc. in Abh. to Dr. Tokuhei Tagai and no. 24405014 to H.O.), Math.-Phys. Cl. Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 3: the Japan Foundation (Japanese Studies and 801 (1843). Endl., Syn. Conif. 243 (1847). Miq., Intellectual Exchange in 2006 to H.O.), and Fl. Jap. 2: 61, t. 128 (1870). Toshiba International Foundation (Support for Present treatment: Taxus cuspidata Siebold Research to Promote Understanding of Japan in & Zucc. 2008–2011). Japanese name: Ichii; Araragi (Endlicher 1847, Miquel 1870), Itstii noki (Miquel 1870). References Akiyama S. and Ohba H. 2012. A taxonomic revision of Lectotype (designated by Spjut in 2007): Podocarpus macrophyllus (Thunb.) Sweet and its Legit in Japonia et Communicavit de Siebold related taxa (Podocarpaceae). Bull. Natn. Mus. Nat. anno 1842, Herb. Zuccarinii (M 0120949) Sci. 38: (in press). [Category 2] (Fig. 28). Carrière E. A. 1855. Traité Général des Conifères. By the Original material: In Japonia legit author, Paris. Endlicher 1847. Synopsis Coniferarum, 368 pp. Scheitlin communicabit d. Siebold, Herb. Zuccarini & Zollikofer, St. Gallen. (M 0120950) [Category 2b]. In Japonia legit Farjon A. 1990. Pinaceae. [Regnum Vegetabile, vol. 121], communicavit d. Siebold, Herb. Zuccarinii (M pp. 330. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein. 0120951) [Category 2b]. In Japonia. S. [Siebold] Farjon A. 1993. Names in current use in the Pinaceae (Gymnospermae) in the ranks of genus to variety. In: s.n. (L 0328580) [Category 3]. Japonia. Insula Greuter W. (ed.), NCU-2 Names in Current Use in the Jezo. arbuscula in H. B. Desima culta ex Insula Families Trichocomaceae, Cladoniaceae, Pinaceae, Jezo introducta. [Siebold s.n.] (L 0175881) and Lemnaceae [Regnum Vegetabile, vol. 128], pp. [Category 1, 2, 3]. [image. in de Kort et al. 105–146. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein. (2000)]. [Japan] (MAK S1814, 1838) [Category Farjon A. 1998. World Checklist and Bibliography of . 298 pp. The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 2]. Farjon A. 2001. World Checklist and Bibliography of Conifers, 2nd ed. 309 pp. The Royal Botanic Gardens, Siebold and Zuccarini’s name, Taxus Kew. cuspidata, was validly published in 1843 as Farjon A. 2005. A Monograph of Cupressaceae and Sciadopitys. 643 pp. The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. pointed by Spjut (2007). But he erroneously cited Forbes J. 1839. Pinetum Woburnense. 266 pp. London. the author of reference as Siebold and Zuccarini, Honda M. 1935. Plantae Sieboldianae（シーボルトと植物 because Taxus cuspidata Siebold & Zucc. was 分 類 学 ）. In: Japanisch-Deutsche Gesellschaft, Tokyo published in Zuccarini’s paper, “Beiträge zur (ed.), Siebold Kenkyu シーボルト研究 , pp. 517–596. Iwanami shoten, Tokyo (in Japanese). Morphologie der Coniferen” in Abhandlungen Kämpfer E. 1712. Amœnitatum Exoticarum Fasciculi V. der Mathematisch-Physikalischen Classe Lemgo. der Königlich Bayerrischen Akademie der Kato N. 2003. Makino-Hyôhonkan-Shozô-no-Siebold- 340 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月

Collection. 288 pp. Shibunkaku, Kyoto (in Japanese). Grubov V. I. (eds.), Siebold's Florilegium of Japanese Kato N., Kato H., Kihara A., and Wakabayashi M. (eds.) Plants. 2: 65–306. Maruzen Co. Ltd., Tokyo. 2005. Database CD-Rom Siebold Collection in Makino Ohba H. J. 2007. P. F. B. von Siebold Flora Japonica（シー Herbarium Tokyo Metropolitan University. Tokyo ボルト日本植物誌）. 351pp. Chikuma Shobo, Tokyo (in Metropolitan University Press, Tokyo. Japanese). Kitamura S. 1977. Publication dates of Flora Japonica. In: Schroeder F.-G. and Bayer R. 1973. Zur Nomenklatur Kimura Y. and Kitamura S., A Guide to Flora Japonica von Pinus polita und Pinus thunbergii. Mitt. Deutsch. Philipp Franz von Siebold. pp. 61–62. Johnson Reprint Dendrol. Ges. 66: 61–68. Co., New York. Siebold P. F. von. 1844. Kruidkundige naamlijst van oud en Koch K. 1873. Dendrologie. Vol. 2 Part 2. Verlag von nieuw ingevoerde Japansche en Chineesche planten, Ferdinand Enke, Erlangen. welke in de kweekerij ten behoeve van de koninklijke Koidzumi G. 1933. Communications: Shokubutsu Bunken nederlandsche maatschappij tot aanmoediging van Kankôkai. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 2: 68–69. den Tuinbouw aangekweekt worden, benevens eenige de Kort I., Ridder-Numan J., Thijsse G., Kato N. and geschiedkundige toelichtingen nopens de invoering van Yamaguchi T. 2000. Von Siebold's Botanical Treasures gewassed uit Japan van het jaar 1824 tot 1844. Jaarb. in Leiden, CD-ROM with a Booklet (18 pp.), ETI/ Kon. Ned. Maatsch. Tuinb. 1844: 1–39. NHN, Amsterdam. Siebold P. F. von and Zuccarini J. G. 1826–44. Flora Mabberley D. J. 2008. Mabberley's Plant Book, 3rd ed. Japonica. 1: 1–193, pl. 1–100 (1826–35), 2: 1–44, pl. 1021 pp, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 101–125 (1842–44). Leiden. McNeill J., Barrie F. R., Burdet H. M., Demoulin V., Spjut R. W. 2007. Taxonomy and nomenclature of Taxus Hawksworth D. L., Marhold K., Nicolson D. H., Prado (Taxaceae). Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 1: 203–289. J., Silva P. C., Skog J. E., Wiersema J. H. and Turland N. Stafleu F. A. and Cowan R. S. 1985. Taxonomic Literature J. 2006. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature vol. 5 (Regnum Vegetabile vol. 112). (Vienna Code) [Regnum Vegetabile, vol. 146], 568 pp. Yamaguchi T., Kato N. and Fujii S. 2003. Botanical A. R. G. Grantner Verlag, Ruggell. specimens collected by von Siebold and his group in Miquel F. A. W. 1870. Siebold and Zuccarini's Flora Japan. Gymnospermae Calanus, Special Number 5: Japonica, vol. 2, pp. 45–89, pl. 126†–136, 138–150. 250–259. Leiden. †The publishing date of pls. 126 and 127 is Yamazaki T. 1995. Gymnospermae. In: Iwatsuki K., uncertain whether 1844 or 1870, and pl. 137 is also Yamazaki T., Boufford D. E., and Ohba H. (eds.), Flora uncertain (see Stafleu and Cowan 1985). of Japan. 1: 263–287. Kodansha Ltd., Tokyo. Ohba H., Tchernaja T. A., and Pankratova G. N. 1994. Zuccarini J. G. 1843. Beiträge zur Morphologie der Catalogue of the Siebold Collection of Botanical Coniferen. Abh. Math.-Phys. Cl. Königl. Bayer. Akad. Illustrations in St. Petersburg. In: Kimura Y. and Wiss. 3: 751–805, tab. 1–5.

秋 山 忍 a， G. Thijsseb， H. J. Esserc， 大 場 秀 章 d： Siebold と Zuccarini が日本から記載した分類群のレ クトタイプと原資料，第一部．裸子植物 に用いた標本（原資料）を標本上に記された手記ならび Siebold と Zuccarini は， 主 に Siebold 自 身 お よ び， に記載文などを参考に特定した．また，タイプが指定さ 日本人植物学者，Bürger らの採集品からなるシーボル れていない分類群については，特定した原資料のなかか ト・コレクションを研究し，日本から多数の新種や新変 ら記載に最もよく合致する標本をレクトタイプとして 種を発表し，日本植物相の分類学的研究に多大な貢献を 選定した．さらにすでにレクトタイプが選定されていた 行った．しかしながら，それらの新植物の発表に際して 分類群については再検討を行い，一部不適切な点を正し は大半で標本の引用がなく，またタイプの指定がなされ た．本稿はその第一部で，裸子植物の全分類群を収載し なかった． た． Siebold と Zuccarini が命名した学名の安定化などの （a 国立科学博物館植物研究部， 目的で，ライデン，ミュンヘン，牧野植物標本館（首都 b オランダ・国立植物標本館ライデン大学分館， 大学東京），東京大学総合研究博物館に収蔵されるシー c ドイツ・ミュンヘン州立植物標本館， ボルト・コレクションから Siebold と Zuccarini が記載 d 東京大学総合研究博物館） October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 341 Siebold & Zucc. (M 0120952). (M Zucc. & Siebold Abies bifida Abies Lectotype of of Lectotype Fig. 4. 4. Fig. Siebold Siebold prolifera Thunb. var. var. Thunb. Cycas revoluta Cycas Lectotype of of Lectotype & Zucc. (in the Library of the Academy Russian of Sciences, St. Petersburg). Fig. 3. 3. Fig. 342 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月 October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 343 Siebold & Zucc. (M 0120956). (M Zucc. & Siebold Abies homolepis Abies Lectotype of of Lectotype Fig. 6. 6. Fig. Siebold & Zucc. (M 0120955). (M Zucc. & Siebold Abies firma Abies Lectotype of of Lectotype Fig. 5. 5. Fig. 342 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月 October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 343 Siebold & Zucc. (L 0175886). (L Zucc. & Siebold Abies leptolepis Abies Lectotype of of Lectotype Fig. 8. 8. Fig. Siebold & Zucc. (L 0050745). (L Zucc. & Siebold Abies jezoensis Abies Lectotype of of Lectotype Fig. 7. 7. Fig. 344 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月 October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 345 Siebold & Zucc. (M 0120957). (M Zucc. & Siebold Abies tsuga Abies Lectotype of of Lectotype Fig. 10. 10. Fig.

A. A. torano Siebold & Zucc. and Abies Abies polita Lectotype Lectotype of Siebold ex K. Koch (L 0050743). (L Koch K. ex Siebold Fig. Fig. 9. 344 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月 October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 345 Siebold & Zucc. (L 0050744). (L Zucc. & Siebold Pinus parviflora Pinus Lectotype of of Lectotype Fig. 12. 12. Fig. Siebold & Zucc. (M 0120938). (M Zucc. & Siebold Pinus densiflora Pinus Lectotype of of Lectotype Fig. 11. 11. Fig. 346 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月 October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 347 (Thunb. ex L. (Thunb. f.) D. Siebold (L 0102744, right hand branch) branch) hand right 0102744, (L Siebold Cryptomeria japonica Cryptomeria Siebold (L 0102744, middle branch). middle 0102744, (L Siebold araucarioides spiralis Lectotypes of Lectotypes Don var. Don var. var. and Fig. Fig. 14. Siebold (M 0120964). (M Siebold Cryptomeria dacryoides Cryptomeria Lectotype of of Lectotype Fig. 13. 13. Fig. 346 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月 October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 347 (Thunb. ex L. f.) D. Don Don D. f.) L. ex (Thunb. Cryptomeria japonica Cryptomeria Siebold (L 0423386, lower branch). lower 0423386, (L Siebold Lectotype of of Lectotype sinensis var. var. Fig. 16. 16. Fig. (Thunb. ex L. f.) D. Don Don D. f.) L. ex (Thunb. Cryptomeria japonica Cryptomeria Siebold (MAK S1821). (MAK Siebold Lectotype of of Lectotype pygmaea var. var. Fig. 15. 15. Fig. 348 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月 October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 349 Siebold & Zucc. (M 0120966). (M Zucc. & Siebold Juniperus rigida Juniperus Lectotype of of Lectotype Fig. 18. 18. Fig.

L. var. Juniperus chinensis Endl. (L 0325537, left hand branch). hand left 0325537, (L Endl. Original material of procumbens Fig. 17. 348 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月 October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 349 Siebold & Zucc. (M 0120961). (M Zucc. & Siebold Retinispora pisifera Retinispora Lectotype of of Lectotype Fig. 20. 20. Fig. Siebold & Zucc. (M 0120958). (M Zucc. & Siebold Retinispora obtusa Retinispora Lectotype of of Lectotype Fig.19. Fig.19. 350 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月 October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 351 Siebold Siebold Siebold & Zucc. & Zucc. Siebold Retinispora squarrosa Retinispora culta foliis albo-variegatis foliis culta Original material of of material Original (L 0423367, upper right hand branch). hand right upper 0423367, (L & Zucc. var. var. & Zucc. Fig. 22. 22. Fig. Siebold & Zucc. (M 0120962). (M Zucc. & Siebold Retinispora squarrosa Retinispora Lectotype of of Lectotype Fig. 21. 21. Fig. 350 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月 October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 351 Siebold ex Endl. Endl. ex Siebold Podocarpus koraianus Podocarpus Lectotype of of Lectotype (L 0326208). (L Fig. 24. 24. Fig. Hort. Bogor. ex Siebold ex ex Siebold ex Bogor. Hort. Podocarpus japonicus Podocarpus Lectotype of of Lectotype Endl. (MAK S1831, left-hand branch). left-hand S1831, (MAK Endl. Fig. 23. 23. Fig. 352 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月 October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 353 Siebold & Zucc. (in the Podocarpus Podocarpus maki Lectotype Lectotype of Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, figure). hand left upper Fig. Fig. 26. (Thunb.) (Thunb.) Podocarpus macrophyllus Podocarpus Siebold & Zucc. (M 0120942). (M Zucc. & Siebold maki Original material of of material Original Sweet var. var. Sweet Fig. 25. 25. Fig. 352 植物研究雑誌 第 87 巻 第 5 号 2012 年 10 月 October 2012 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 87 No.5 353 Siebold & Zucc. (M 0120949). (M Zucc. & Siebold Taxus cuspidata Taxus Lectotype of of Lectotype Fig. 28. 28. Fig. Siebold & Zucc. Zucc. & Siebold Cephalotaxus drupacea Cephalotaxus Lectotype of of Lectotype (M 0120945). (M Fig. 27. 27. Fig.