Iraqi Freedom Took Toll on Nevada Guard
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Chemical Weapons Conventions at 1
Rudderless: The Chemical Weapons Convention At 1 ½ Amy E. Smithson Report No. 25 September 1998 Copyright© 1998 11 Dupont Circle, NW Ninth Floor Washington, DC 20036 phone 202.223.5956 fax 202.238.9604 http://www.stimson.org email [email protected] Rudderless: The Chemical Weapons Convention At 1 1/2 Amy E. Smithson INTRODUCTION On the 29th of April 1997, the majority of the world’s nations joined to activate an arms control and nonproliferation accord that will gradually compel the elimination of one of the most abhorred classes of weapons of all times. Previously, the international community had fallen short of the mark in efforts to try to abolish poison gas, despite the opprobrium following its widespread use in World War I.1 The new Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) extends the no use-prohibitions of the 1925 Geneva Protocol2 to outlaw the development, acquisition, production, transfer, and stockpiling of chemical weapons as well. The CWC requires the destruction of chemical weapons production facilities and arsenals over a ten-year period, and countries will witness the shrinking numbers of poison gas factories and munitions. A less tangible function of the CWC, but one that may turn out to be equally valued over the long term is that the CWC will help redefine how states assure their national security. The CWC requires nations to declare activities that were previously considered state secrets and private business information. The treaty authorizes routine and challenge inspections to monitor compliance with its prohibitions. Instead of building large caches of arms, the CWC’s verification processes give governments reason to be confident that managed transparency—a limited waiver of state sovereignty—can enhance national and international security. -
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Every Child, By Name and Face, To Graduation Washoe County School District: Reno, NV | Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2014 Washoe County School District Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014 Prepared By: Business & Financial Services Division Thomas Ciesynski, CPA Chief Financial Officer Michael Schroeder, CPA Gail Carson Budget Director Controller Andrea Sullivan Cindy Vance, CPA Director of Procurement and Contracts Accounting Manager Jill Murdock Robert Carson Budget Project Manager Senior Accountant Lisa Mae Woods Rob Luna Senior Accountant Grant Fiscal Administrator Val Gilmore Stephen Ashorn Special Education Admin Services Bond Accountant Washoe County School District Superintendent & Board of Trustees Pedro Martinez Barbara Clark Barbara McLaury Superintendent Board of Trustees Board of Trustees President Vice President Lisa Ruggerio Estela Gutierrez John Mayer Board of Trustees Board of Trustees Board of Trustees Clerk Member Member Dave Aiazzi Howard Rosenberg Board of Trustees Board of Trustees Member Member WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. I. INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal i-x List of Principal Officials xi Organizational Chart xii Certificate of Excellence in Financial Reporting xiii II. FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report 1-3 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 4-19 Basic Financial Statements: Government-wide Financial Statements: Statement -
Nevada National Guard's Training Team Begins
Geico Military Department Full 56346 Governor Gibbons Major General Kirkland Commander in Chief The Adjutant General Nevada Nevada National Guard Governor Features: Jim Gibbons The Adjutant General Spout off! We can take it! . 4 Major General Cynthia N. Kirkland High Rollers ready to test ability in combat environment . 8 Managing Editor/State Public Affairs Officer Nevada Army Guard polices world’s largest combat air base . 11 Captain April Conway Above and Beyond: soldiers, airmen carve out time Editor for community service . 12 Sergeant First Class Erick Studenicka Deployment round-up . 14 Contributors Potential gaming heir serves with 72nd MPs . 17 Lieutenant Colonel Terry Conder Joint Force Headquarters Public Affairs Cut the clutter: Nevada Guard prepares for DIMHRS . 20 Master Sergeant Suzanne Connell 152nd Airlift Wing Public Affairs Departments: Specialist Rob Honeycutt 106th Public Affairs Detachment From the Director of the Joint Staff . 3 Staff Sergeant Julie Parker 152nd Airlift Wing Public Affairs From the State Command Sergeant Major . 5 Technical Sergeant Wendy Yada Drop Zone . 6 152nd Airlift Wing Public Affairs Family Support . 19 Sports Briefs . 21 News Briefs . 22 Awards, Promotions, Retirements . 24 Enlistments . 27 Events Schedule . 28 ON THE COVER: Senior Airman Cory Galli, left, advises Bob Ulin, Publisher airmen how to ready themselves for a chemical Susan Harrington, Editor Gloria Schein, Art Director combat situation in advance of the Operational Darrell George, Advertising Sales Readiness Exercise. Photo: Sgt. 1st Class Erick Studenicka Toll Free: (866) 562-9300 • Fax: (907) 562-9311 www.nevadaguard.com www.AQPpublishing.com In accordance with Department of Defense Instruction violation or rejection of this equal opportunity policy by an name, phone number, e-mail and complete mailing address and 5120.4, Battle Born is an authorized, unofficial publication of advertiser is confirmed, the publisher shall refuse to print comments to: the Nevada National Guard. -
Technical Secretariat
OPCW Technical Secretariat Verification Division S/1207/2014 8 August 2014 Original: ENGLISH NOTE BY THE DIRECTOR–GENERAL SUMMARY OF VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES IN 2013 1. The Second Special Session of the Conference of the States Parties to Review the Operation of the Chemical Weapons Convention (hereinafter “the Second Review Conference”) reaffirmed the importance of factual reporting by the Technical Secretariat (hereinafter “the Secretariat”) on verification results “in the interests of transparency and continued assurance of States Parties’ compliance” (paragraph 9.51 of RC-2/4, dated 18 April 2008). In addition, as stated in paragraphs 3.187 and 3.188 of the Note by the Secretariat issued for the Third Special Session of the Conference of the States Parties to Review of the Operation of the Chemical Weapons Convention (hereinafter “the Third Review Conference”), “Review of the Operation of the Chemical Weapons Convention since the Second Review Conference” (RC-3/S/1, dated 12 March 2013 and Corr.1, dated 20 March 2013), “Recent developments in the Secretariat’s factual reporting on verification have further enhanced transparency and the continued assurance of States Parties’ compliance …. The Secretariat will continue its efforts to improve the way it reports on verification results”. 2. In light of the above, the Secretariat has prepared the attached OPCW verification summary for 2013, which reflects the verification work undertaken by the Secretariat during that year. 3. The summary provides valuable feedback on the Secretariat’s verification activities, especially to States Parties that are not represented in The Hague. In terms of public outreach, it is consistent with the OPCW’s Media and Public Affairs Policy (C-I/DEC.55, dated 16 May 1997) and presents pertinent information on such work to a wider audience. -
Assessment of Plasma Arc Technology for Processing of Chemical Demilitarization Wastes
Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization Technology Evaluation for Chemical Demilitarization Assessment of Plasma Arc Technology for Processing of Chemical Demilitarization Wastes Contract: DAAD13-01-D-0007 Task: T-02-AT-003 Final Science Applications International Corporation The findings in this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorizing documents Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization Technology Evaluation for Chemical Demilitarization Assessment of Plasma Arc Technology for Processing of Chemical Demilitarization Wastes Contract: DAAD13-01-D-0007 Task: T-02-AT-003 Final October 2002 Science Applications International Corporation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Plasma arc (PA) technology has been used predominantly for steel making in electric arc furnaces. Several commercial-scale facilities were built as the result of efforts in the early 1970s to use PA for processing hazardous waste, including low-level mixed waste, medical waste, contaminated soils, and industrial wastes. PA technology was also evaluated for destruction of chemical warfare agents in the early stages of the U.S. Chemical Demilitarization Program (CDP). Through the 1990s, PA technology was investigated by several federal agencies for treating various wastes, including chemical warfare agent simulants and surrogate agent neutralent solutions. The heart of PA technology is sustaining an electric arc by passing an electric current through a diatomic gas. High temperatures are achieved as the resistivity of the gas converts electrical energy to heat energy. The gases dissociate into their atomic state at 2,000°C, and ionize, as electrons are stripped away at 3,000°C. Electrically generated plasmas can achieve temperatures of 20,000°C while burning of fossil fuels has an upper practical limit of 2,000°C. -
Preparing the US Army for Homeland Security
Preparing the U.S. Army for HOMELANDHOMELAND SECURITYSECURITY Concepts, Issues, and Options Eric V. Larson, John E.Peters Arroyo Center R The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army under Contract No. DASW01-96-C-0004. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Larson, Eric V. (Eric Victor), 1957– Preparing the U.S. Army for homeland security : concepts, issues, and options / Eric V. Larson, John E. Peters. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. MR-1251-A ISBN 0-8330-2919-3 1. United States. Army. 2. United States—Defenses. I. Peters, John E., 1947– II. Title. UA25 .L27 2000 355' 033273—dc21 00-045819 RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. © Copyright 2001 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2001 by RAND 1700 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/ To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Internet: [email protected] PREFACE This report addresses the many conceptual, programmatic, and practical issues associated with an emergent mission area for the U.S. Army and Department of Defense (DoD) called “homeland security” (until recently the mission was known as “homeland defense”). -
Rudderless: the Chemical Weapons Convention at 1 ½
Rudderless: The Chemical Weapons Convention At 1 ½ Amy E. Smithson Report No. 25 September 1998 Copyright© 1998 11 Dupont Circle, NW Ninth Floor Washington, DC 20036 phone 202.223.5956 fax 202.238.9604 http://www.stimson.org email [email protected] Rudderless: The Chemical Weapons Convention At 1 1/2 Amy E. Smithson INTRODUCTION On the 29th of April 1997, the majority of the world’s nations joined to activate an arms control and nonproliferation accord that will gradually compel the elimination of one of the most abhorred classes of weapons of all times. Previously, the international community had fallen short of the mark in efforts to try to abolish poison gas, despite the opprobrium following its widespread use in World War I.1 The new Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) extends the no use-prohibitions of the 1925 Geneva Protocol2 to outlaw the development, acquisition, production, transfer, and stockpiling of chemical weapons as well. The CWC requires the destruction of chemical weapons production facilities and arsenals over a ten-year period, and countries will witness the shrinking numbers of poison gas factories and munitions. A less tangible function of the CWC, but one that may turn out to be equally valued over the long term is that the CWC will help redefine how states assure their national security. The CWC requires nations to declare activities that were previously considered state secrets and private business information. The treaty authorizes routine and challenge inspections to monitor compliance with its prohibitions. Instead of building large caches of arms, the CWC’s verification processes give governments reason to be confident that managed transparency—a limited waiver of state sovereignty—can enhance national and international security. -
THE CBW CONVENTIONS BULLETIN News, Background and Comment on Chemical and Biological Weapons Issues
THE CBW CONVENTIONS BULLETIN News, Background and Comment on Chemical and Biological Weapons Issues ISSUE NO. 44 JUNE 1999 Quarterly Journal of the Harvard Sussex Program on CBW Armament and Arms Limitation IMPLEMENTING THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION: TECHNICAL AND POLITICAL CHALLENGES IN THE US AND RUSSIA Paul F Walker Global Green USA After years of tedious and contentious negotiations, most by the end of 1999 and that 90 per cent of the initial 31,495 everyone breathed a deep sigh of relief when the Chemical tons in the stockpile is now under contract for destruction. Weapons Convention (CWC) was signed by 130 countries Only two of the nine major American stockpile sites remain in January 1993. The immediate challenge thereafter was without a contract or technology for stockpile destruction. to achieve ratification by the required 65 nations for entry The total estimated cost for stockpile destruction has grown into force and by the two major chemical weapon powers – to $12.4 billion, for non-stockpile chemical materiel to $1.4 Russia and the United States. Over four years later, on 29 billion, and for emergency preparedness to $1.2 billion; the April 1997 the CWC entered into force with the United grand total of $15 billion far exceeds early estimates of $2 States just making it under the wire with its ratification four billion or less and, as Prociv pointed out, will be subject to days earlier. Russia ratified on 5 November 1997. “out-year cost growth” if schedules continue to slip, addi- For some observers, this was the long-awaited culmina- tional technology development is necessary, or more buried tion of many decades of effort to abolish a whole class of chemical weapon materiel is identified. -
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 113 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 113 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 159 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2013 No. 158 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 12, 2013, at 2 p.m. Senate THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2013 The Senate met at 10 a.m. and was The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The of 95, Billy Graham will preach what’s called to order by the President pro clerk will report the motion. been called his final message to Amer- tempore (Mr. LEAHY). The legislative clerk read as follows: ica. Motion to proceed to the bill (H.R. 3204) to Growing up, Billy Graham wanted to PRAYER amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic be a baseball player. Thankfully, God The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- Act with respect to human drug had different plans. And ever since that fered the following prayer: compounding and drug supply chain secu- night in Tampa, he’s put his extraor- Let us pray. rity, and for other purposes. dinary natural talents and generosity O God, our refuge and strength, give RECOGNITION OF THE MINORITY LEADER of spirit at the service of others. us reverence for Your greatness. Guide The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Billy Graham’s first crusade took our Senators around the pitfalls of Republican leader is recognized. place in the Civic Auditorium in Grand their work, enabling them to have Mr. MCCONNELL. Mr. President, I Rapids, MI, in September 1947. -
TRUCKEE MEADOWS WATER AUTHORITY Board of Directors AGENDA Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 10:00 A.M
D TRUCKEE MEADOWS WATER AUTHORITY Board of Directors AGENDA Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. th Sparks Council Chambers, 745 4 Street, Sparks, NV Board Members Chair Geno Martini Vice Chair Vaughn Hartung Member Neoma Jardon Member Jeanne Herman Member Jenny Brekhus Member Naomi Duerr Member Ron Smith NOTES: 1. The announcement of this meeting has been posted at the following locations: Truckee Meadows Water Authority (1355 Capital Blvd., Reno), Reno City Hall (1 E. First St., Reno), Sparks City Hall (431 Prater Way, Sparks), Sparks Justice Court (1675 E. Prater Way, Sparks), Washoe County Courthouse (75 Court St., Reno), Washoe County Central Library (301 South Center St., Reno), Washoe County Administration (1001 East Ninth St., Reno), at http://www.tmwa.com, and State of Nevada Public Notice Website, https://notice.nv.gov/. 2. In accordance with NRS 241.020, this agenda closes three working days prior to the meeting. We are pleased to make reasonable accommodations for persons who are disabled and wish to attend meetings. If you require special arrangements for the meeting, please call (775) 834-8002 at least 24 hours before the meeting date. 3. Staff reports and supporting material for the meeting are available at TMWA and on the TMWA website at http://www.tmwa.com/meeting/ or you can contact Sonia Folsom at (775) 834-8002. Supporting material is made available to the general public in accordance with NRS 241.020(6). 4. The Board may elect to combine agenda items, consider agenda items out of order, remove agenda items, or delay discussion on agenda items. -
Demonstrated Ammunition Demilitarization Technologies
Demonstrated Ammunition Demilitarization Technologies Capability Location Technology Type Description Capacity/Throughput Status DDESB Approved OB has been used to treat energetic wastes by self-sustained combustion, which is ignited by an Typical energetic wastes treated by OB include bulk propellants and energetic material items external source (such as a flame, heat, or detonation wave that does not result in an explosion) which are not reliably detonable and/or can be burned without causing an explosion. (U.S. Environmental Protection Agencey (USEPA), June 1997). Occasionally, OB has been used for the treatment of solvents that contain energetic constituents or other energetic-contaminated wastes. Each location has a Resource Conservation and In the past, OB was frequently conducted on the ground surface or in burn trenches. Current best Recovery Act (RCRA) permit which limits the amount of OB which can be performed on a daily and management practice for OB involves the use of burn pans to contain the energetic waste prior to or annual basis. Additional State or local restrictions may exist. treatment as well as the residue and ash from the burn. Burn pans typically range in size from 3 to Open Burn (OB) Various Locations ??? Destruction Demonstrated 5 ft. wide by 5 to 20 ft. long and are 1 to 2 ft. deep (USEPA, June 1997). Based on field tests conducted by the U.S. Army, the OB ash/residue from the treatment of bulk propellants is approximately a factor of 10-3 of the original energetic waste mass (U.S. Army, January 1992). Because of safety hazards, as well as site specific feasibility factors for alternative treatment technologies, there are certain circumstances and energetic wastes that necessitate the use of OB treatment. -
Occ Health Full Book.Indb
Index INDEX A execution of, 17–18 exposure assessment model, 17–18 Abbreviations, xix–xxii headquarters level role and responsibilities, 12–13 Aberdeen Proving Ground, 9 installation level role and responsibilities, 13–16 Acceleration injury, 268 major command roles and responsibilities, 13 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, 122 management review, 19 ACGIH. See American Conference of Governmental Industrial overview, 12 Hygienist planning process, 16–17 Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, Under Secretary of role and responsibilities, 12–16 Defense for, 115–116 supervisor role and responsibilities, 16 Acronyms, xix–xxii Air pollution, 478 ADA. See Americans with Disabilities Act Air-purifying respirators, 220–222 Adams, John, 42 Air sampling, 84–85 Administrative medical examinations, 63–64 Airborne hazards, 596–599 Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer, 76 Al Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Center, 92 Aerospace medicine Aliphatic nitrate esters acceleration injury, 268 nitrocellulose, 572 altitude-induced hypoxia, 264–265 nitroglycerin, 568–572 barotrauma, 265–266 Altitude-induced hypoxia, 264–265 circadian rhythm disturbance, 273–275 Ambient air regulations, 392 color vision, 279–281 AMC. See Army Materiel Command counter fatigue programs, 278–279 AMCOM. See Aviation and Missile Life Cycle Management decompression sickness, 266–267 Command ejection injury, 268 American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienist, 156, environmental risk factors, 276–277 236, 239, 368 ergonomics, 275 American Industrial Hygiene