DOCSLIB.ORG

Hawthorne Army Depot Installation Action Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hawthorne Army Depot Installation Action Plan Hawthorne Army Depot Installation Action Plan MARCH 2001 INSTALLATION ACTION PLAN 2001 Hawthorne Army Depot PURPOSE The purpose of the Installation Action Plan (IAP) is to outline the total multi-year restoration program for an installation. The plan will define all Installation Restoration Program (IRP) requirements and propose a comprehensive approach and associated costs to conduct future investigations and remedial actions at each Solid Waste Man- agement Unit (SWMU) at the installation and other areas of concern. In an effort to coordinate planning information between the IRP manager, major army commands (MACOMs), installations, executing agencies, regulatory agencies, and the public, an IAP has been completed for Hawthorne Army Depot. The IAP is used to track requirements, schedules and tentative budgets for all major Army installation restoration programs. All site specific funding and schedule information has been prepared according to projected overall Army funding levels and is therefore subject to change during the document’s annual review. Under current project funding, all remedies will be in place at Hawthorne Army Depot by the end of 2010. CONTRIBUTORS TO THIS YEAR’S IAP NAME ORGANIZATION Rebecca Jewell Benscoter Hawthorne Army Depot Mary Jean Fischer IRP Support, Engineering & Environment Herman Millsap Hawthorne Army Depot Sophie Ngu U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento Eric Noack Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Kevin Tiemeier HQ, Operations Support Command APPROVAL Hawthorne Army Depot HERMAN MILLSAP ANNE L. DAVIS, LTC U.S. Army Remedial Project Manager Commanding Hawthorne Army Depot CONCURRENCE ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND JEWEL SIMMONS Environmental Restoration Program Manager ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND APPROVAL Hawthorne Army Depot HERMAN MILLSAP REBECCA J. BENSCOTER Remedial Project Manager Public Affairs Officer JOHN ROCK KEVIN TIEMEIER Installation Serving Legal MSC Environmental Restoration Advisor Program Manager, OSC SOPHIE NGU HENRY CRAIN, PhD Project Manager, Corps of MSC Environmental Chief Engineers ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS AEC Army Environmental Center bgs below ground surface CA Corrective Action CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 CMS Corrective Measure Study COE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CPT Cone Penotrometer CY Cubic Yards DA Department of Army DD Decision Document DERA Defense Environmental Restoration Account DERP Defense Environmental Restoration Program DOD Department of Defense DOL Directorate of Logistics DSERTS Defense Site Environmental Restoration Tracking System DSMOA Defense/ State Memorandum of Agreement EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency ER,A Environmental Restoration, Army (Formally DERA) FS Feasibility Study FY Fiscal Year GOCO Government Owed/Contractor Operated HWAAP Hawthorne Army Ammunition Plant HWAD Hawthorne Army Depot IAP Installation Action Plan IRA Interim Remedial Action IRP Installation Restoration Program LTM Long Term Monitoring MCL Maximum Contaminant Level NDEP Nevada Division of Environmental Protection NE Not Evaluated NFA No Further Action NFRAP No Further Remedial Action Planned NON Notice of Noncompliance NOV Notice of Violation NPL National Priorities List OB/OD Open Burning / Open Detonation ODA Old Demolition Area OMA Operations and Maintenance - Army OWS Oil and Water Separator POL Petroleum, Oil and Lubricants PA Preliminary Assessment PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyls PCE Perchloroethylene PPB Parts Per Billion PPM Parts Per Million PY Prior Year RA Remedial Action ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS CONTINUED… RAC Risk Assessment Code RA(C) Remedial Action - Construction RA(O) Remedial Action - Operation RAB Restoration Advisory Board RAP Remedial Action Plan RC Response Complete RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RD Remedial Design RECAP Risk Evaluation/ Corrective Action Program REM Removal RI Remedial Investigation RIP Remedy in Place RFI RCRA Facility Investigation ROD Record of Decision RRSE Relative Risk Site Evaluation SI Site Inspection STP Sewer Treatment Plant SVOC Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds SWMU Solid Waste Management Unit TCE Trichloroethylene TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons TRC Technical Review Committee USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers USACHPPM United States Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine USAEC United States Army Environmental Center USAEHA United States Army Environmental Hygiene Agency (now CHPPM) USATHMA United States Army Toxic and Hazardous Material Agency (replaced by AEC) UST Underground Storage Tank UXO Unexploded Ordnance VOC Volatile Organic Compounds SUMMARY STATUS: Non-NPL. NUMBER OF DSERTS SITES: 123 DSERTS sites 32 Active ER,A Eligible Sites 91 Response Complete DSERTS Sites DIFFERENT SITE TYPES: 7 Burn Areas 1 Fire/Crash Training Area 4 Contaminated Fill 4 Surface Disposal Area 3 Disposal Pit/Dry Well 4 Waste Treatment Plants 1 Incinerator 1 Explosive Ordnance Disposal Area 4 Storage Areas 42 Surface Impoundments 5 Spill Site Areas 1 Unexploded Munitions/Ordnance 41 Landfills 1 Above Ground Storage Tank 1 Firing Range 2 Underground Storage Tanks 1 Other CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (TNT), 1,3,5-Trinitro-1,3,5-Triazacychlohexane (RDX), Composition D (ammonium picrate), Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) MEDIA OF CONCERN: Soil, Groundwater COMPLETED REM/IRA/RA: • 4 RAs CURRENT IRP PHASES: RI/FS 1 sites RD/RA 9 sites RA 2 sites LTM 17 sites LTO 3 sites PROJECTED IRP PHASES: IRA 1 site RD 9 sites RA 11 sites LTM 4 sites LTO 1 site IDENTIFIED POSSIBLE REM/ • RA at HWAAP- B04, B20, B24, B26, B27A, IRA/RA: B29, I02, I07, I08, I09/10, J29 • IRA at HWAAP-I02 FUNDING: FY1993 to FY00 Funds: $ 22,221,000 Current Year (FY01) Funds: $ 2,001,000 FUTURE REQUIREMENTS: $ 22,349,000 TOTAL: $ 46,571,000 DURATION: YEAR OF IRP INCEPTION: 1993 YEAR OF IRP COMPLETION EXCLUDING LTM: 2010 YEAR OF IRP COMPLETION INCLUDING LTM: 2014 Hawthorne Army Depot - Installation Action Plan Summary - Page 1 INSTALLATION INFORMATION LOCALE HWAD is located in Mineral County, Nevada, approximately 135 miles southeast of Reno, NV. The depot covers an area of approximately 150,000 acres and encloses three sides of the town of Hawthorne which has a population of approximately 4,500 people. HWAD is bounded on three sides by mountains; the Wassuk Mountain Range on the west, the Gillis Range on the east, and the Excelsior Mountains on the south. Walker Lake bounds the depot on the north. COMMAND ORGANIZATION MAJOR COMMAND: United States Army Materiel Command (AMC), Environmental Quality Division MAJOR SUBORDINATE COMMAND: U.S. Army Operations Support Command, Environmental Quality Directorate INSTALLATION: HWAD, Operations Review Division INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM (IRP) EXECUTING AGENCY Investigation and Remedial Action Phase; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District REGULATOR PARTICIPATION FEDERAL: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX STATE: Nevada Department of Environmental Protection (NDEP) REGULATORY STATUS • Non-NPL/ RCRA Permit • Interagency Agreement, None MAJOR CHANGES TO ACTION PLAN FROM PREVIOUS YEAR (FY 00) • Several sites have now been closed with minimal surface work and final documentation. • Remediation at 2 of the largest contaminated sites continue. Further investigation at 2 sites. Continued area wide groundwater monitoring. Hawthorne Army Depot - Installation Action Plan Installation Information & Description - Page 2 INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION HWAD is currently a Government owned/Contractor operated (GOCO) facility. Day & Zimmermann Hawthorne Corporation [DZHC, Former Day and Zimmermann/Basil Corporation (DZB)] is the current operating contractor. The government and DZHC employ approximately 500 personnel. The current mission of HWAD is to receive, issue, store, renovate, inspect, demil, and dispose of conventional ammunition. The installation was originally constructed in 1928 as a US Naval Ammunition Depot. The early mission of the depot was to store, service, and issue ammunition to the Pacific Area. Following World War II, the Depot was actively involved in the demolition of various types of allied and enemy ammunition. The role of the Depot was also expanded to include receiving, renovating, loading, maintaining, storing, and issuing ammunition, explosives, expendable ordnance items, and/or weapons and technical ordnance materials. The Depot was also used to test weapons and dispose of unserviceable and/or dangerous ammunition and explosives. In 1977 the Depot was transferred to the U.S. Army renamed Hawthorne Army Ammunition Plant (HWAAP). After the transfer, HWAAP was redesignated as a GOCO Plant in 1980 and operating under the direction of DZB. Its mission in 1980-1994 was to (1) receive, produce, assemble, load, issue, store, renovate, inspect, test demilitarize, and dispose of conventional ammunition; (2) operate and/or maintain in operational readiness cast and fuel-air explosive loading plants, rocket assemble plants, and medium/major caliber assembly lines; (3) provide special/experimental high explosive casting, extruding, and pressing; fuel air explo- sive loading and support services to designated research and development activities; (4) provide storage facilities for war reserve ammunition, and maintain designated ammunition in a state of readiness for mobilization, including assembling or otherwise providing base unit materials; and (5) conduct testing of solid propelled munitions, high explosive warheads, mechanical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Chemical Weapons Conventions at 1
    Rudderless: The Chemical Weapons Convention At 1 ½ Amy E. Smithson Report No. 25 September 1998 Copyright© 1998 11 Dupont Circle, NW Ninth Floor Washington, DC 20036 phone 202.223.5956 fax 202.238.9604 http://www.stimson.org email [email protected] Rudderless: The Chemical Weapons Convention At 1 1/2 Amy E. Smithson INTRODUCTION On the 29th of April 1997, the majority of the world’s nations joined to activate an arms control and nonproliferation accord that will gradually compel the elimination of one of the most abhorred classes of weapons of all times. Previously, the international community had fallen short of the mark in efforts to try to abolish poison gas, despite the opprobrium following its widespread use in World War I.1 The new Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) extends the no use-prohibitions of the 1925 Geneva Protocol2 to outlaw the development, acquisition, production, transfer, and stockpiling of chemical weapons as well. The CWC requires the destruction of chemical weapons production facilities and arsenals over a ten-year period, and countries will witness the shrinking numbers of poison gas factories and munitions. A less tangible function of the CWC, but one that may turn out to be equally valued over the long term is that the CWC will help redefine how states assure their national security. The CWC requires nations to declare activities that were previously considered state secrets and private business information. The treaty authorizes routine and challenge inspections to monitor compliance with its prohibitions. Instead of building large caches of arms, the CWC’s verification processes give governments reason to be confident that managed transparency—a limited waiver of state sovereignty—can enhance national and international security.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Secretariat
    OPCW Technical Secretariat Verification Division S/1207/2014 8 August 2014 Original: ENGLISH NOTE BY THE DIRECTOR–GENERAL SUMMARY OF VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES IN 2013 1. The Second Special Session of the Conference of the States Parties to Review the Operation of the Chemical Weapons Convention (hereinafter “the Second Review Conference”) reaffirmed the importance of factual reporting by the Technical Secretariat (hereinafter “the Secretariat”) on verification results “in the interests of transparency and continued assurance of States Parties’ compliance” (paragraph 9.51 of RC-2/4, dated 18 April 2008). In addition, as stated in paragraphs 3.187 and 3.188 of the Note by the Secretariat issued for the Third Special Session of the Conference of the States Parties to Review of the Operation of the Chemical Weapons Convention (hereinafter “the Third Review Conference”), “Review of the Operation of the Chemical Weapons Convention since the Second Review Conference” (RC-3/S/1, dated 12 March 2013 and Corr.1, dated 20 March 2013), “Recent developments in the Secretariat’s factual reporting on verification have further enhanced transparency and the continued assurance of States Parties’ compliance …. The Secretariat will continue its efforts to improve the way it reports on verification results”. 2. In light of the above, the Secretariat has prepared the attached OPCW verification summary for 2013, which reflects the verification work undertaken by the Secretariat during that year. 3. The summary provides valuable feedback on the Secretariat’s verification activities, especially to States Parties that are not represented in The Hague. In terms of public outreach, it is consistent with the OPCW’s Media and Public Affairs Policy (C-I/DEC.55, dated 16 May 1997) and presents pertinent information on such work to a wider audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Plasma Arc Technology for Processing of Chemical Demilitarization Wastes
    Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization Technology Evaluation for Chemical Demilitarization Assessment of Plasma Arc Technology for Processing of Chemical Demilitarization Wastes Contract: DAAD13-01-D-0007 Task: T-02-AT-003 Final Science Applications International Corporation The findings in this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorizing documents Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization Technology Evaluation for Chemical Demilitarization Assessment of Plasma Arc Technology for Processing of Chemical Demilitarization Wastes Contract: DAAD13-01-D-0007 Task: T-02-AT-003 Final October 2002 Science Applications International Corporation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Plasma arc (PA) technology has been used predominantly for steel making in electric arc furnaces. Several commercial-scale facilities were built as the result of efforts in the early 1970s to use PA for processing hazardous waste, including low-level mixed waste, medical waste, contaminated soils, and industrial wastes. PA technology was also evaluated for destruction of chemical warfare agents in the early stages of the U.S. Chemical Demilitarization Program (CDP). Through the 1990s, PA technology was investigated by several federal agencies for treating various wastes, including chemical warfare agent simulants and surrogate agent neutralent solutions. The heart of PA technology is sustaining an electric arc by passing an electric current through a diatomic gas. High temperatures are achieved as the resistivity of the gas converts electrical energy to heat energy. The gases dissociate into their atomic state at 2,000°C, and ionize, as electrons are stripped away at 3,000°C. Electrically generated plasmas can achieve temperatures of 20,000°C while burning of fossil fuels has an upper practical limit of 2,000°C.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing the US Army for Homeland Security
    Preparing the U.S. Army for HOMELANDHOMELAND SECURITYSECURITY Concepts, Issues, and Options Eric V. Larson, John E.Peters Arroyo Center R The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army under Contract No. DASW01-96-C-0004. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Larson, Eric V. (Eric Victor), 1957– Preparing the U.S. Army for homeland security : concepts, issues, and options / Eric V. Larson, John E. Peters. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. MR-1251-A ISBN 0-8330-2919-3 1. United States. Army. 2. United States—Defenses. I. Peters, John E., 1947– II. Title. UA25 .L27 2000 355' 033273—dc21 00-045819 RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. © Copyright 2001 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2001 by RAND 1700 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/ To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Internet: [email protected] PREFACE This report addresses the many conceptual, programmatic, and practical issues associated with an emergent mission area for the U.S. Army and Department of Defense (DoD) called “homeland security” (until recently the mission was known as “homeland defense”).
    [Show full text]
  • Rudderless: the Chemical Weapons Convention at 1 ½
    Rudderless: The Chemical Weapons Convention At 1 ½ Amy E. Smithson Report No. 25 September 1998 Copyright© 1998 11 Dupont Circle, NW Ninth Floor Washington, DC 20036 phone 202.223.5956 fax 202.238.9604 http://www.stimson.org email [email protected] Rudderless: The Chemical Weapons Convention At 1 1/2 Amy E. Smithson INTRODUCTION On the 29th of April 1997, the majority of the world’s nations joined to activate an arms control and nonproliferation accord that will gradually compel the elimination of one of the most abhorred classes of weapons of all times. Previously, the international community had fallen short of the mark in efforts to try to abolish poison gas, despite the opprobrium following its widespread use in World War I.1 The new Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) extends the no use-prohibitions of the 1925 Geneva Protocol2 to outlaw the development, acquisition, production, transfer, and stockpiling of chemical weapons as well. The CWC requires the destruction of chemical weapons production facilities and arsenals over a ten-year period, and countries will witness the shrinking numbers of poison gas factories and munitions. A less tangible function of the CWC, but one that may turn out to be equally valued over the long term is that the CWC will help redefine how states assure their national security. The CWC requires nations to declare activities that were previously considered state secrets and private business information. The treaty authorizes routine and challenge inspections to monitor compliance with its prohibitions. Instead of building large caches of arms, the CWC’s verification processes give governments reason to be confident that managed transparency—a limited waiver of state sovereignty—can enhance national and international security.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CBW CONVENTIONS BULLETIN News, Background and Comment on Chemical and Biological Weapons Issues
    THE CBW CONVENTIONS BULLETIN News, Background and Comment on Chemical and Biological Weapons Issues ISSUE NO. 44 JUNE 1999 Quarterly Journal of the Harvard Sussex Program on CBW Armament and Arms Limitation IMPLEMENTING THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION: TECHNICAL AND POLITICAL CHALLENGES IN THE US AND RUSSIA Paul F Walker Global Green USA After years of tedious and contentious negotiations, most by the end of 1999 and that 90 per cent of the initial 31,495 everyone breathed a deep sigh of relief when the Chemical tons in the stockpile is now under contract for destruction. Weapons Convention (CWC) was signed by 130 countries Only two of the nine major American stockpile sites remain in January 1993. The immediate challenge thereafter was without a contract or technology for stockpile destruction. to achieve ratification by the required 65 nations for entry The total estimated cost for stockpile destruction has grown into force and by the two major chemical weapon powers – to $12.4 billion, for non-stockpile chemical materiel to $1.4 Russia and the United States. Over four years later, on 29 billion, and for emergency preparedness to $1.2 billion; the April 1997 the CWC entered into force with the United grand total of $15 billion far exceeds early estimates of $2 States just making it under the wire with its ratification four billion or less and, as Prociv pointed out, will be subject to days earlier. Russia ratified on 5 November 1997. “out-year cost growth” if schedules continue to slip, addi- For some observers, this was the long-awaited culmina- tional technology development is necessary, or more buried tion of many decades of effort to abolish a whole class of chemical weapon materiel is identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Demonstrated Ammunition Demilitarization Technologies
    Demonstrated Ammunition Demilitarization Technologies Capability Location Technology Type Description Capacity/Throughput Status DDESB Approved OB has been used to treat energetic wastes by self-sustained combustion, which is ignited by an Typical energetic wastes treated by OB include bulk propellants and energetic material items external source (such as a flame, heat, or detonation wave that does not result in an explosion) which are not reliably detonable and/or can be burned without causing an explosion. (U.S. Environmental Protection Agencey (USEPA), June 1997). Occasionally, OB has been used for the treatment of solvents that contain energetic constituents or other energetic-contaminated wastes. Each location has a Resource Conservation and In the past, OB was frequently conducted on the ground surface or in burn trenches. Current best Recovery Act (RCRA) permit which limits the amount of OB which can be performed on a daily and management practice for OB involves the use of burn pans to contain the energetic waste prior to or annual basis. Additional State or local restrictions may exist. treatment as well as the residue and ash from the burn. Burn pans typically range in size from 3 to Open Burn (OB) Various Locations ??? Destruction Demonstrated 5 ft. wide by 5 to 20 ft. long and are 1 to 2 ft. deep (USEPA, June 1997). Based on field tests conducted by the U.S. Army, the OB ash/residue from the treatment of bulk propellants is approximately a factor of 10-3 of the original energetic waste mass (U.S. Army, January 1992). Because of safety hazards, as well as site specific feasibility factors for alternative treatment technologies, there are certain circumstances and energetic wastes that necessitate the use of OB treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraqi Freedom Took Toll on Nevada Guard
    Winter 2012 Governor Brian Sandoval Brigadier General Bill Burks Commander in Chief The Adjutant General Nevada Nevada National Guard Governor Features: Brian Sandoval Freedom ranges offer bang-up training opportunities . 5 The Adjutant General 1864th Soldier is one in a 1,000 . 8 Brig. Gen. Bill Burks Ross’ return marks end of era in Iraq . 10 Managing Editor/State Public Affairs Officer 485th locks down battlefield insurgents . 12 Maj. April Conway Reno seminar aims to increase rifle knowledge . 13 Editor Contest reveals talented crop of Nevada Soldiers . 14 Sgt. 1st Class Erick Studenicka Deployed 422nd Soldiers moonlight as teachers’ aides . 17 Staff Writer/Photographer Airman’s algorithm boosts NASA’s lunar exploration . 18 Sgt. Mike Getten New brigade patch features familiar Nevada icons . 20 Public Affairs Intern Catherine Stokes Contributors Departments: Lt. Col. Terry Conder, Joint Force Headquarters From Senior Leadership: Lt. Gen. Harry Wyatt . 3 Public Affairs; Spc. Emerson Marcus, 106th Public Affairs Detachment; Staff Sgt. Eric Ritter, 152nd Airlift Wing From Senior Enlisted Leadership: Command Sgt. Maj. Steve Sitton . 4 Public Affairs; 1st Lt. Jason Yuhasz, 152nd Airlift Wing Public Affairs; Lt. Col. (Ret.) Steve Ranson, Drop Zone . 6 Joint Force Headquarters Deployment Roundup . 16 Spotlight: Sheet metal shop has simple creed . 19 Sports News . 21 News Briefs . 22 Awards . 24 Promotions . 26 Retirements . 26 Accessions . 27 Event Schedule . 28 Bob Ulin, Publisher ON THE COVER: 2nd Lt. Rory Mele of the 1864th Marie Lundstrom, Editor Transportation Company beat the odds to make a Gloria Schein, Graphic Designer successful bone marrow donation last year. Chris Kersbergen • Darrell George, Advertising Sales Photo illustration: Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • Occ Health Full Book.Indb
    Index INDEX A execution of, 17–18 exposure assessment model, 17–18 Abbreviations, xix–xxii headquarters level role and responsibilities, 12–13 Aberdeen Proving Ground, 9 installation level role and responsibilities, 13–16 Acceleration injury, 268 major command roles and responsibilities, 13 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, 122 management review, 19 ACGIH. See American Conference of Governmental Industrial overview, 12 Hygienist planning process, 16–17 Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, Under Secretary of role and responsibilities, 12–16 Defense for, 115–116 supervisor role and responsibilities, 16 Acronyms, xix–xxii Air pollution, 478 ADA. See Americans with Disabilities Act Air-purifying respirators, 220–222 Adams, John, 42 Air sampling, 84–85 Administrative medical examinations, 63–64 Airborne hazards, 596–599 Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer, 76 Al Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Center, 92 Aerospace medicine Aliphatic nitrate esters acceleration injury, 268 nitrocellulose, 572 altitude-induced hypoxia, 264–265 nitroglycerin, 568–572 barotrauma, 265–266 Altitude-induced hypoxia, 264–265 circadian rhythm disturbance, 273–275 Ambient air regulations, 392 color vision, 279–281 AMC. See Army Materiel Command counter fatigue programs, 278–279 AMCOM. See Aviation and Missile Life Cycle Management decompression sickness, 266–267 Command ejection injury, 268 American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienist, 156, environmental risk factors, 276–277 236, 239, 368 ergonomics, 275 American Industrial Hygiene
    [Show full text]
  • January 6, 2006
    Vol. 64, No. 1 Publishedished inin thethe interinterest of the 7th Infantry Division and Fort Carson community Jan. 6, 2006 Visit the Fort Carson Web site at www.carson.army.mill Cav troopers become American citizens 2005 — a look back by Col. Randy Pullen Color Guard from Fort Riley, Kan.; and Story and photo by Sgt. 1st Army News Service a number or ROTC detachments, Class Donald Sparks including marching units from Texas 3rd ACR Public Affairs WASHINGTON — As is usual at A&M, the Citadel and Virginia Military this time of year, most news organiza- Institute. Baghdad, Iraq — As a young boy tions take a look back at what made January came to an end with the growing up in the Dominican Republic, news in the year just ended. successful election in Iraq in which Amaury Lantigua always wanted to The Army News Service is no dif- voters elected a national assembly to serve in the military. He was particu- ferent. So what made news for the Army write the new Iraqi constitution and larly impressed by the discipline the in 2005? You could almost sum it up in council members to represent each of men in uniform exemplified every time three words: war, hurricanes and elec- the 18 provinces in Iraq. he saw them. tions. Almost. Despite threats from the insurgents At age 20 Lantigua left his native January and some attacks on polling places, country and arrived in the United States The Army started 2005 just as it millions of Iraqis cast their votes, a where he settled in New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Guide Series for Arts Organizations
    Military Base redevelopment & the arts Part of the Federal Resource Guide Series for Arts Organizations Snapshot Resource Guide 5 2006—2nd Edition Legislation: MILITARY BASES Table of Contents Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (Public Law 101- 510) as amended by The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Snapshot 1 Year 2002 to authorize a round of closures and realignments in 2005. Background 2 Type of Assistance: Explanation of Base Direct funding to municipalities and local redevelopment authorities Closing Process 3 and other assorted federal grants from various agencies. Examples of the Arts at Redeveloped Installations 6 Who May Apply: Additional Resources 7 Municipalities and local redevelopment authorities, nonprofit organi- zations involved in redevelopment efforts. 2005 Base Realignment & Closure Commission Closure List 9 Activities Funded: “Bricks and mortar” construction, capital improvement, planning activities, services to the community. FY 2006 Federal Budget FY 2006 Appropriations: Multiple agencies and programs. Defense Source: Americans for the Arts, June 2006. Background Federal funding opportunities may be available due to the closure of military installations in your state and community. Base closings can be met with anger and disbelief in some communities, and acceptance and hope in others. For local arts organizations and related cultural groups with a A base closing can forward-looking perspective, a base closing can be a chance to revitalize your community through the arts and culture. be a chance to revitalize your It is through the base closing process and its expected dynamic of planning that we direct community your attention to a great opportunity for a local arts organization to find a new home, new through the arts venue, new gallery space, new museum, new funding, and an improved quality of life for and culture.
    [Show full text]