DOCSLIB.ORG

Shakespeare in His Time Reading List, 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shakespeare in His Time Reading List, 2019 Shakespeare in his Time Reading List, 2019 Course convenor: Dr. Chris Stamatakis, [email protected] The purpose of this course is to build on your undergraduate study of Shakespeare by developing your knowledge of his works in relation to the contexts of his time. Each seminar will consider a work or works by Shakespeare in relation to an aspect of historical context, which might include: related works by his contemporaries; authorial collaboration; literary sources and traditions; political, religious, social, intellectual, or cultural developments; early textual history; or early modern performance practices. Your coursework essay should also discuss a work or works by Shakespeare in relation to some aspect of his time. In preparation for the course you should read as wide a selection as possible from Shakespeare’s plays and poems. You may wish to buy a copy of the Complete Works, or you may already own one from your undergraduate days. The department recommends the Riverside Complete Shakespeare, the Arden Shakespeare Complete Works, the Oxford Complete Shakespeare, or the Norton Shakespeare. UCL Library has good holdings both of these and of single-play editions. You should also make use of the reading list below. It begins with a general section (pp. 1-3), which you should use for selective browsing according to your interests, and to support your essay work. After this (pp. 3-8) you will find lists of preparatory reading for each seminar. For queries about these individual reading lists, please contact the tutor whose name is shown against the seminar title. Please note that for each seminar you must read in advance the specified literary work(s) by Shakespeare or his contemporaries. In each case we recommend a particular edition whose Introduction and notes will be particularly useful to you, so do make use of these as well as reading the text of the work. Sometimes required critical reading is also indicated; this too must be done in advance of the seminar. Shortly before each seminar the tutor may contact you with more detailed preparation instructions. You are also encouraged to browse in the list of suggested reading for each seminar, especially if you plan to write an essay on the topic concerned. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ General Reading Bate, Jonathan, and Dora Thornton (eds), Shakespeare: Staging the World (London: British Museum, 2012) Briggs, Julia, This Stage-Play World: English Literature and its Background, 1580-1625 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983) Kastan, David Scott, ed., A Companion to Shakespeare (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999) Kermode, Frank, The Age of Shakespeare (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 2004) On Shakespeare’s life: Holland, Peter, ‘Shakespeare, William (1564–1616)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004; online edn, Jan 2013), http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/25200 Weis, René, Shakespeare Revealed: A Biography (London : John Murray, 2007) 1 On Shakespeare in relation to his contemporaries: Hoenselaars, Ton, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Contemporary Dramatists (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010) Wiggins, Martin, Shakespeare and the Drama of his Time (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000) On sources: Bullough, Geoffrey, ed., Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare, 8 vols (London: Routledge and Paul, 1957-1975) Gillespie, Stuart, Shakespeare’s Books: A Dictionary of Shakespeare Sources (London: Continuum, 2004) On early textual history: Murphy, Andrew, ed., A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text (Oxford: Blackwell, 2007) Stern, Tiffany, Making Shakespeare: From Stage to Page (London: Routledge, 2004) Wells, Stanley, and Gary Taylor, William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion (Oxford: Clarendon, 1987) On early modern performance practices: Carson, Christie, and Farah Karim-Cooper, eds, Shakespeare’s Globe: A Theatrical Experiment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008) Gurr, Andrew, The Shakespearean Stage, 1574-1642, 4th edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009) On Shakespeare’s London: Crawforth, Hannah, Sarah Dustagheer, and Jennifer Young, Shakespeare in London (London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, 2015) On Shakespeare and religious contexts: Cummings, Brian, Mortal Thoughts: Religion, Secularity and Identity in Shakespeare and Early Modern Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013) Kastan, David Scott, A Will to Believe: Shakespeare and Religion (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014) Shell, Alison, Shakespeare and Religion (London: Arden Shakespeare, 2010) New historicist approaches: Greenblatt, Stephen, Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988) Montrose, Louis, The Purpose of Playing: Shakespeare and the Cultural Politics of the Elizabethan Theatre (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996) E-resources available from UCL Library: From http://www.ucl.ac.uk/library/electronic-resources/databases: BBC Shakespeare Archive Drama Online – includes Arden Shakespeare editions Early English Books Online (EEBO) Historical Texts Oxford Scholarly Editions Online Shakespeare Collection World Shakespeare Bibliography 2 See also: Folger Shakespeare Library Digital Image collection and Folger Digital Texts downloadable source code. A number of Shakespeare e-journals are available via UCL Library – see especially Shakespeare, Shakespeare Quarterly, and Shakespeare Survey. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reading for Seminars 1. Methodologies: Hamlet in its Time (Dr Chris Stamatakis, [email protected], and Sarah Burn, English Librarian) Recommended editions: Hamlet, ed. Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor, Arden Shakespeare 3rd series (London: Arden Shakespeare, 2006) [The section headed ‘Hamlet in Shakespeare’s time’ (pp. 36–59) will be particularly useful] If you are interested in the 1603 text (Q1), an excellent edition, by the same editors, is Hamlet: The Texts of 1603 and 1623, ed. Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor, Arden Shakespeare 3rd series (London: Arden Shakespeare, 2006). Required critical reading: Murphy, Andrew, ‘What Happens in Hamlet?’, in A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text, ed. Andrew Murphy (Oxford: Blackwell, 2007; online 2008), pp. 1–14. Shell, Alison, ‘The History of Purgatory and Hamlet’, in Shakespeare and Religion (London: Arden Shakespeare, 2010). Suggested reading: Berger, Thomas L., ‘Shakespeare Writ Small: Early Single Editions of Shakespeare’s Plays’, in Andrew Murphy, ed., A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text (Oxford: Blackwell, 2007), pp. 57–70. Burrow, Colin, Shakespeare and Classical Antiquity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), esp. ‘Introduction’, pp. 1–20. Cummings, Brian, Mortal Thoughts: Religion, Secularity and Identity in Shakespeare and Early Modern Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), esp. ‘Hamlet’s Luck: Shakespeare and the Renaissance Bible’, pp. 207–35. Greenblatt, Stephen, Hamlet in Purgatory (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001). Gurr, Andrew, The Shakespearian Playing Companies (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), esp. ‘An Introduction’, pp. 3–18. Hoenselaars, Ton, ‘Shakespeare: Colleagues, Collaborators, Co-authors’, in Ton Hoenselaars, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Contemporary Dramatists (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 97–119. Taylor, Michael, ‘Shakespeare in History and History in Shakespeare’, in Michael Taylor, Shakespeare Criticism in the Twentieth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 163–93. A longer reading list will be provided in the seminar. 3 2. Titus Andronicus and Ovid (Dr Chris Stamatakis, [email protected]) Recommended editions: Titus Andronicus, ed. Jonathan Bate, Arden Shakespeare 3rd series (London: Arden Shakespeare, 2002). ______________ ed. Eugene M. Waith, Oxford World’s Classics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984, 2008). Required critical reading: Oakley-Brown, Liz, ‘Titus Andronicus and the Sexual Politics of Translation’, in Ovid and the Cultural Politics of Translation in Early Modern England (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006), pp. 23–43. Taylor, Anthony Brian, ‘Animals in “manly shape as too the outward showe”: Moralizing and Metamorphosis in Titus Andronicus’, in Anthony Brian Taylor (ed.) Shakespeare’s Ovid: the Metamorphoses in the Plays and Poems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 66– 80. Suggested reading: Bate, Jonathan, Shakespeare and Ovid (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998), pp. 101–17. Burrow, Colin, ‘Ovid’, in Shakespeare and Classical Antiquity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 92–132. Taylor, Anthony Brian, ‘Melting Earth and Leaping Bulls: Shakespeare’s Ovid and Arthur Golding’, Connotations 4 (1994–5): 192–206. Warren, Roger, ‘Trembling Aspen Leaves in Titus Andronicus and Golding’s Ovid’, Notes and Queries 29.2 (1982): 112. West, Grace, ‘Going by the Book: Classical Allusions in Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus’, Studies in Philology 79.1 (1982): 62–77. You might also find it useful to look at Arthur Golding’s English translation of Ovid (The .xv. bookes of P. Ouidius Naso, entytuled Metamorphosis, London: Willyam Seres, 1567): Shakespeare’s Ovid Being Arthur Golding’s Translation of the Metamorphoses, ed. William Rouse (New York: Norton, 1966). Electronic text (from Perseus): http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3atext%3a1999.02.0074 3. The Body in Venus and Adonis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bibliography for the Study of Shakespeare on Film in Asia and Hollywood
    CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture ISSN 1481-4374 Purdue University Press ©Purdue University Volume 6 (2004) Issue 1 Article 13 Bibliography for the Study of Shakespeare on Film in Asia and Hollywood Lucian Ghita Purdue University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, and the Critical and Cultural Studies Commons Dedicated to the dissemination of scholarly and professional information, Purdue University Press selects, develops, and distributes quality resources in several key subject areas for which its parent university is famous, including business, technology, health, veterinary medicine, and other selected disciplines in the humanities and sciences. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, the peer-reviewed, full-text, and open-access learned journal in the humanities and social sciences, publishes new scholarship following tenets of the discipline of comparative literature and the field of cultural studies designated as "comparative cultural studies." Publications in the journal are indexed in the Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature (Chadwyck-Healey), the Arts and Humanities Citation Index (Thomson Reuters ISI), the Humanities Index (Wilson), Humanities International Complete (EBSCO), the International Bibliography of the Modern Language Association of America, and Scopus (Elsevier). The journal is affiliated with the Purdue University Press monograph series of Books in Comparative Cultural Studies. Contact: <[email protected]> Recommended Citation Ghita, Lucian. "Bibliography for the Study of Shakespeare on Film in Asia and Hollywood." CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 6.1 (2004): <https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1216> The above text, published by Purdue University Press ©Purdue University, has been downloaded 2531 times as of 11/ 07/19.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shakespeare Authorship Companion
    All That Is Shakespeare Melts into Air The New Oxford Shakespeare Authorship Companion reviewed by Michael Dudley, Gary Goldstein, and Shelly Maycock. The New Oxford Shakespeare Authorship Companion. Edited by Gary Taylor & Gabriel Egan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. $168.84 USD. he Shakespeare deniers are at it again. Here is yet another book filled with so- called “evidence” hidden in the texts – which only the deniers can decode – Tto support their conspiracy theory that Shakespeare didn’t write Shakespeare. It’s the old hoary argument that a commoner from Stratford-Upon-Avon could not have possibly written the greatest works in the English language. By himself, at any rate. Yes, the argument in The New Oxford Shakespeare Authorship Companion – a supplemen- tary volume to Oxford University Press’ prestigious new edition of the Shakespeare plays – is that Shakespeare wrote with some eleven collaborators and co-authors. These would include Christopher Marlowe, Thomas Middleton, Thomas Dekker, and Anonymous on seventeen of the dramas; the editors also suggest we need to ex- pand the size of the canon from 37 to 44 plays, only two-thirds of which are entirely by Shakespeare. Yet, as we shall see, the theories and methods used to reach these conclusions are as problematic as the scholarship’s all but single-minded focus on cryptic analysis at the level of single words and even syllables, in service of a group authorship theory. The rhetorical conceit in the opening paragraph above is intend- ed to be more than tongue-in cheek; instead, it underscores the extent to which the Shakespeare establishment has started to resemble the nineteenth century Baconians it professes to abhor.
    [Show full text]
  • "'A Complicated and Unpleasant Investigation': the Arden Shakespeare 1899-1924" by Gabriel Egan This Paper Arises From
    Egan, Gabriel. 2007d. "'''A complicated and unpleasant investigation': The Arden Shakespeare 1899-1924': A paper delivered on 12 July at the conference 'Open the Book, Open the Mind: The 2007 meeting of the Society for History of Authorship, Reading, and Publishing (SHARP)' at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 11-15 July." "'A complicated and unpleasant investigation': The Arden Shakespeare 1899-1924" by Gabriel Egan This paper arises from a survey of Shakespeare play editions in the twentieth century. I'm particularly interested in what those who made editions thought they were doing, how confident they felt about their work, how they thought readers would respond to the textual problems that arise in editing old plays, and how editors' assumptions about their readers were manifested in the editions that they produced. My published title in the programme covers the whole century of editions, but I'm going largely to confine my remarks to just one editorial project. For those of you who like to see the big picture first, however, I can offer a brief overview of just one of those variables I mentioned: editorial confidence [SLIDE]. I see it going like this, from a low at the start of the twentieth-century, through to a peak in the 1970s, and back to a low now. From the detailed history behind this pattern, I have room on this chart to pull just a few keys moments. [SLIDE] First, A. W. Pollard's book Shakespeare Folios and Quartos (1909) distinguished the good from the bad quartos and gave editors reasons to suppose that the good ones are textually close to Shakespeare's own papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Contemporary Allusions
    Appendix A Selected Contemporary Allusions 1. Robert Greene, Groats- Worth of Witte ( 1592). Quoted and discussed above, pp. 1-6, 53-4. See also Appendix B. 2. Henry Chettle, Kind-Harts Dreame (1592; SR 8 Dec. 1592), from the Epistle, 'To the Gentlemen Readers'. Discussed pp. 7, 21. he that offendes being forst, is more excusable than the wilfull faultie ... lie shew reason for my present writing, and after proceed to sue for pardon. About three moneths since died M. Robert Greene, leauing many papers in sundry Booke sellers hands, among other his Groats­ worth of wit, in which a letter written to diuers play-makers, is offensiuely by one or two of them taken, and because on the dead they cannot be auenged, they wilfully forge in their conceites a liuing Author: and after tossing it two and fro, no remedy, but it must light on me. How I haue all the time of my conuersing in printing hindred the bitter inueying against schollers, it hath been very well knowne, and how in that I dealt I can sufficiently prooue. With neither of them that take offence was I acquainted, and with one of them I care not if I neuer be: The other (i.e. Shakespeare], whome at that time I did not so much spare, as since I wish I had, for that as I haue moderated the heate of liuing writers, and might haue vsde my owne discretion (especially in such a case) the Author beeing dead, that I did not, I am as sory, as if the originall fault had beene my fault, because my selfe haue seene his demeanor no !esse ciuill than he exelent in the qualitie he professes: Besides, diuers of worship haue reported, his vprightnes of dealing, which argues his honesty, and his facetious grace in writting, that aprooues his Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Reading
    Further reading Which edition if Shakespeare should I buy? This is not usually a problem as most often you will be told which par­ ticular edition of an individual play you should use. If you are free to choose your edition, you will obviously want to ensure that it is both reliable and as helpful as possible. The following series all have good notes, sound critical introductions, and are fully annotated: the Arden Shakespeare (a new, revised series will start appearing in 1995), the New Cambridge Shakespeare, the New O'fford Shakespeare (being published in paperback by World's Classics), and the New Penguin Shakespeare. In addition, you will find it useful to have a copy of Shakespeare's com­ plete works both for further reading and for reference. The standard Complete Works is that edited by Peter Alexander for Collins (we have taken our quotations from this); the Oxford edition of the Complete Works edited by Gary Taylor and Stanley Wells has many non-standard features; the Riverside Shakespeare (edited by G.B. Evans) has useful intro­ ductions to the plays. What critical books should I read? If you have read the play you have been set to study, but cannot see what it is about, what you need is a book that gives you an idea of the significance of the play. An introductory volume in this respect is Mar­ guerite Alexander's An Introduction to Shakespeare and his Contemporaries (1979). Similarly Philip Edwards's Shakespeare: A Writer's Progress (1986) will provide some starting-points, as will Richard Dutton's William Sha­ kespeare: A Literary Lifo (1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Hamlet (The New Cambridge Shakespeare, Philip Edwards Ed., 2E, 2003)
    Hamlet Prince of Denmark Edited by Philip Edwards An international team of scholars offers: . modernized, easily accessible texts • ample commentary and introductions . attention to the theatrical qualities of each play and its stage history . informative illustrations Hamlet Philip Edwards aims to bring the reader, playgoer and director of Hamlet into the closest possible contact with Shakespeare's most famous and most perplexing play. He concentrates on essentials, dealing succinctly with the huge volume of commentary and controversy which the play has provoked and offering a way forward which enables us once again to recognise its full tragic energy. The introduction and commentary reveal an author with a lively awareness of the importance of perceiving the play as a theatrical document, one which comes to life, which is completed only in performance.' Review of English Studies For this updated edition, Robert Hapgood Cover design by Paul Oldman, based has added a new section on prevailing on a draining by David Hockney, critical and performance approaches to reproduced by permission of tlie Hamlet. He discusses recent film and stage performances, actors of the Hamlet role as well as directors of the play; his account of new scholarship stresses the role of remembering and forgetting in the play, and the impact of feminist and performance studies. CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS www.cambridge.org THE NEW CAMBRIDGE SHAKESPEARE GENERAL EDITOR Brian Gibbons, University of Munster ASSOCIATE GENERAL EDITOR A. R. Braunmuller, University of California, Los Angeles From the publication of the first volumes in 1984 the General Editor of the New Cambridge Shakespeare was Philip Brockbank and the Associate General Editors were Brian Gibbons and Robin Hood.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning to See the Theological Vision of Shakespeare's King Lear
    Learning to See the Theological Vision of Shakespeare’s King Lear Learning to See the Theological Vision of Shakespeare’s King Lear By Greg Maillet Learning to See the Theological Vision of Shakespeare’s King Lear By Greg Maillet This book first published 2016 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2016 by Greg Maillet All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-9729-9 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-9729-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS Polemical Prologue .................................................................................... vii Criticism, Theology, and the Value of Shakespeare’s King Lear Chapter One ................................................................................................. 1 “See Better”: Christian Paradox in Act One of King Lear Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 27 “I Nothing Am”: Confusion and Clarification of Identity in Act Two of King Lear Chapter Three ............................................................................................ 51 “This Night will turn us all to Fools and Madmen”: Storm and the Transformation of Identity
    [Show full text]
  • AW. Pollard and Twentieth-Century Shakespeare Editing
    Shakespeare, More or Less: A-W. Pollard and Twentieth-Century Shakespeare Editing Paul Werstine Those who have disputed Shakespeare’s authorship of the plays and poems usually attributed to him have been inclined to name the eminent Shakespeare scholars who have vilified the anti-Stratfordian cause. In the Preface to his 1908 book The Shakes­ peare Problem Restated, the urbane Sir Granville George Greenwood quoted Sidney Lee, then chair of Shakespeare’s Birthplace Trust, mocking the Baconian theory as ‘“foolish craze,’ ‘morbid psychology,’ ‘madhouse chatter”’ (vii) and John Churton Collins, chair of English Literature at the University of Birmingham, denouncing it as “‘ignorance and vanity”’ (viii). More recendy, Charlton Ogburn has listed among the detractors of the Oxfordian theory Louis B. Wright, former director of the Folger Shakespeare Library (154, 161,168); S. Schoenbaum, author of Shakespeare’s Lives, which devotes one hundred pages “to denigration of...anti-Stratfordian articles and books” (152); and Harvard Shakespeare professors G. Blakemore Evans and Harry Levin (256-57). In view of the energy and labour expended by numerous prominent scholars defending Shakespearean authorship, it is not surprising to dis­ cover that this defence has influenced reception of Shakespeare’s works and their edi­ torial reproductions. This essay deals with the very successful resistance movement against the anti-Stratfordians that was led by A.W. Pollard from 1916 to 1923, and with the peculiar influence that Pollard’s efforts have continued to exert, even upon today’s Shakespeare editors. FlorUegium 16 (1999) Like those Shakespeareans mentioned by Greenwood and Ogburn, Pollard, as an editor of the important bibliographical and editorial quarterly The Library and as Keeper of Printed Books at the British Museum, was well placed to fend off anti-Stratfordians.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare Edited by Margreta De Grazia and Stanley Wells Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-88632-1 - The New Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare Edited by Margreta De Grazia and Stanley Wells Index More information INDEX Note: Page numbers for illustrations are given in italics. Works by Shakespeare appear under title; works by others under author’s name. 4D art: La Tempête 296 , 297 language 83–4 , 86 , 202 , 203 , 208 performance 52 , 333 actor-managers 287 sexuality and gender 221 actors apprentices 45–6 actions and feelings 194–5 Arabic performances 297–8 globalization 287–91 Archer, William 236 performance 233–8 , 248–9 , 287–8 Arden, Mary ( later Shakespeare) xiv , in Shakespeare’s London 45–9 , 61 4 , 5 see also boy actors Arden, Robert 4 , 5 Adams, W. E. 68 ‘Arden Shakespeare’ 69 , 73 , 83 , 255 , 292 , Addison, Joseph 80–1 326 Adelman, Janet Ariosto, Ludovico: Orlando Furioso 92 Hamlet to the Tempest 338 Aristotle 88 , 122 , 128 , 138 Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Armin, Robert 46 , 98 Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s art 339 Plays 338 As You Like It xv , 62 , 114–15 Aesop: Fables 19 categorization 171 Afghanistan 289–90 , 294 characters 46 Age of Kings, An (BBC mini-series) 313 language 17 Akala 280–1 plot devices 109 , 173 Al-Bassam, Sulayman: Richard III – An Arab sexuality and gender 218 , 219 , 223–4 Tragedy 297–8 sources 23 Alexander, Shelton 280 theatre 51 , 52 All is True see Henry VIII Ascham, Roger: The Scholemaster 18 , 20 , Allen, A. J. B. 327 22–3 Allot, Robert: England’s Parnassus 91 Aubrey, John 8 All’s Well That Ends Well xvi , 62 , 84 , audiences 116–17 , 122 , 199 , 213 , 219 audience agency 316–17 Almereyda, Michael: Hamlet 318 , 319–21 , early modern popular culture 271–3 , 274 320 media history 315–17 Amyot, Jacques 20 authors and authorship 1 , 32–4 , 61–2 , 97 , Andrews, John F.: William Shakespeare: His 291–5 , 308 World, His Work, His Infl uence 328 Autran, Paulo 290–1 anti-Stratfordianism 273 Antony and Cleopatra xvi , 62 , 162–3 Bacon, Francis 128 actors 46 Bakhtin, Michaïl 275 characters 163 , 274 Baldwin, T.
    [Show full text]
  • View Publication
    Vol. XIX THE • VP.START • CROW• Editor J ames Andreas Clemso11 U11iversity Fou11di11g Editor William Bennett The University of Tennessee at Martin Associate Editors Michael Cohen Murray State U11iversity Herbert Coursen University of Maine, Augusta Charles Frey The U11 iversity of Washington Marjorie Garber Harvard U11iversity Juana Green Clemson University Walter Haden The U11 iversity of Tennessee at Marti11 Chris Hassel Va11derbilt University Maurice Hunt Baylor U11iversity Richard Levin The U11iversity of California, Davis John McDaniel Middle Te11nessee State University Peter Pauls The Un iversity of Wimzipeg Jeanne Roberts America11 U11 iversity Business Managers Martha Andreas and Charlotte Holt Clemson U11iversity Productio11 Editors Tharon Howard, William Wentworth, and Allen Swords Clemson University Account Managers Pearl Parker and Judy Payne Copyright 1999 Clemson University All Rights Reserved Clemson University Digital Press Digital Facsimile Vol. XIX About anyone so great as Shakespeare, it is probable that we can never be right, it is better that we should from time to time change our way of being wrong. -T. S. Eliot What we have to do is to be forever curiously testing new opinions and courting new impressions. -Walter Pater The problems (of the arts) are always indefinite, the results are always debatable, and the final approval always uncertain. -Paul Valery Essays chosen for publication do not necessarily represent opinions of the editor, associate editors, or schools with which any contributor is associated. The published essays represent a diversity of approaches and opinions which we hope will stimulate interest and inspire new scholarship. Subscription Information Two issues-$14 Institutions and Libraries, same rate as individuals-$14 two issues Submission of Manuscripts Essays submitted for publication should not exceed fifteen to twenty double­ spaced typed pages, including notes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxford Shakespeare Pdf Free Download
    HENRY V: THE OXFORD SHAKESPEARE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK William Shakespeare,Gary Taylor | 352 pages | 01 Aug 2008 | Oxford University Press | 9780199536511 | English | Oxford, United Kingdom Henry V: The Oxford Shakespeare PDF Book The book uses t Academic Skip to main content. Thank you for shopping at our store. Overview The introduction includes an examination of the Quarto and texts, and of the relationship between them; a critical discussion of the play's historical and literary sources; an examination of conflicting critical attitudes to the play, and of its fluctuating theatrical fortunes; and a demonstration of the range and variety of Shakespeare's characterization. Tillyard supports the idea of the Tudor myth , which considers England's 15th century to be a dark time of lawlessness and warfare, that after many battles eventually led to a golden age of the Tudor Period. Oxford World's Classics Series. Description About the Author s Description Henry V , the climax of Shakespeare's sequence of English history plays, is an inspiring, often comic celebration of a young warrior- king. The French suffered 10, casualties; the English, fewer than Keywords: Shakespeare , Henry V , warfare , ordinances , Renaissance , war , medieval laws , nations. More Shakespeare's Henry V has traditionally been acclaimed for its impressive depiction of the psychological and political impact of warfare, and it remains one of the most widely-discussed plays in the canon. All Rights Reserved. The conductor was Sir Neville Marriner. If you have any queries, please contact us via ebay. Shakespeare Survey , volume 38, Cambridge University Press The Star Ledger. Shakespeare's Money Robert Bearman.
    [Show full text]
  • “Gary Taylor and Terri Bourus Make Shakespeare Come Alive with Such Enthusiasm, You’D Swear the Bard Himself Was Sitting in the Room with Them
    P RAISE FOR T HE CREATION AND RE -CREATION OF C ARDENIO: PERFORMING SHAKESPEARE, T RANSFORMING CERVANTES! “Gary Taylor and Terri Bourus make Shakespeare come alive with such enthusiasm, you’d swear the Bard himself was sitting in the room with them. Meticulous and passionate scholars, they don’t shy away from questioning long-held theories and testing them—not only through extensive research— but also through the crucible of live performance. It does not surprise me that they would tackle the reconstruction of Cardenio or that Gary would take some twenty years to do it. When they’re done, Cardenio will certainly stand as a testament to how painstaking line-by-line scholarship can combine with academic imagination to create pure joy.” —Jim Simmons, Producer/Writer of “Shakespeare Lost/Shakespeare Found” TV documentary about The History of Cardenio “This persuasive book should put to rest nearly three hundred years of debate over the lost King’s Men play of 1613. Cardenio was indeed a Fletcher/ Shakespeare collaboration, based on episodes from Cervantes’ bestseller Don Quixote. Lewis Theobald was not a forger: his 1727 adaptation Double Falsehood does derive from Cardenio. With meticulous scholarship and cre- ative theatrical acumen the editors assemble a formidable case, and also tri- umphantly publish for the first time Taylor’s ‘unadaptation’ of The History of Cardenio.” —David Carnegie, Emeritus Professor FRSNZ, School of English, Film, Theatre, and Media Studies, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand; and co-editor of The
    [Show full text]