DOCSLIB.ORG

The Hasmonean High Priests and Their Priestly Descent Introduction The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Hasmonean High Priests and Their Priestly Descent Introduction The CHAPTER TEN THE HASMONEAN HIGH PRIESTS AND THEIR PRIESTLY DESCENT Introduction The strong Hellenistic aspects of the high priesthood of both Jonathan and Simon have been discussed. Attention was paid to the supporters of the institution of the Hasmonean high priesthood as well as to those who opposed its realization. Hence, much space has been dedicated to the way the Hasmoneans defended the institutionalization of their high priesthood. They did it by using all available means: diplomatic, political, socio-economic, military, propagandistic, and more. But how did the Hasmonean high priests justify their high priesthood in religious/biblical terms? In this last chapter it is necessary to investi- gate the priestly descent of the Hasmoneans. The specific question that must be addressed is, why, according to 1 Macc 2:54, did the Hasmonean high priests claim Phinehas as their “father.” Why not Aaron or Zadok? Or, for example, why not an Israelite/Judean king? The present analysis is important for at least three reasons. First, it will help shape a deeper understanding of the relation of the Hasmonean (high) priestly family to other priestly families. Second, it will shed light on the literary (and ideological) traditions with regard to who could or could not occupy the high priestly office in Jerusalem in particular in the Hellenistic period. Third, it will help clarify further issues related to the Jewish groups who actively opposed the institution of the Hasmonean high priesthood. 1. The Jehoiarib Priests in Biblical and Extra-Biblical Sources According to 1 Macc 2:1, Mattathias—father of Jonathan—was [son] of John, [son] of Simeon “a priest of the sons of Joarib” (cf. 14:29). Morton Smith, among others, claimed the Hasmoneans were priests but probably not of “Aaronide family.” He further argued that the prominence of the J(eh)o(i)arib priestly course is a Hasmonean product.1 In the opinion of 1 “Maccabees,” 321–24. 270 CHAPTER TEN Lawrence H. Schiffman, the “Zadokite priests, tracing their ancestry to Zadok, high priest in the time of Solomon, had occupied the high priest- hood virtually without interruption up to the Maccabean revolt.” Jonathan, however, was “not of Zadokite line.”2 The author further asserts that Ben Sira “champions the priestly House of Zadok and its exclusive rights to the high priesthood.”3 For Deborah W. Rooke, it is Mattathias and his sons who were “of the line of Aaron in post-exilic terms, although they were not of the line of Zadok which had been the traditional line of descent for the high priests,” whose last representative was the Oniad Jason.4 A simi- lar opinion was expressed by Hanan Eshel. The scholar added that Mene- laus was the first not from the Zadokite house to have assumed the high priesthood. Instead, the Teacher of Righteousness, who allegedly served as high priest between 159 and 152, was of Zadokite dynasty.5 Furthermore, in the view of Othmar Keel, the Hasmonean high priests appealed to Phinehas as their father because they were “Nicht-Zadokiden.”6 Yet Alison Schofield and James C. VanderKam claim that the Hasmoneans were Zadokites and that “they probably were part of the considerable fam- ily that traced its heredity to Zadok.”7 This view had been earlier expressed also by Luc Dequeker.8 Therefore, it is necessary to examine to what extent one can affirm that the Hasmoneans were or were not Zadokites or Aaronides. Such assump- tions are often at the basis of another assumption; namely, that because of their descent the Hasmoneans encountered difficulties in being accepted as “legitimate” high priests. Therefore, one must first briefly investigate the origin of J(eh)o(i)arib in extant sources. :in Ezra 8:16 (LXX יויריב Jehoiarib appears in the Hebrew Bible as in 1 Chr 9:10 יהויריב Ιωαρίβ); Neh 11:10 (᾿Ιωαρίμ); 12:6, 19 (᾿Ιαρὶμ[?]), and as᾿ (//Neh 11:10); 24:7 (᾿Ιωαρίμ/᾿Ιαρὶβ). J(eh)o(i)arib is mentioned once in a story referring to the time of Ezra’s mission in Ezra 8:15–20.9 He appears 2 Reclaiming, 71. 3 Reclaiming, 75, 88, 95, 201; idem, Qumran, 82, 101–3. 4 Zadok’s Heirs, 281 and 275, 311. 5 Dead Sea Scrolls, 33, 55, 60. 6 “1 Makk 2,” 128. 7 “Hasmoneans,” 80. 8 “1 Chronicles XXIV,” 103. 9 Jehoiarib is not provided with any further genealogical note (“son of ”) in Ezra 8:16, which speaks in favour of him being inserted here; cf. Ezra 8:2–14, 18–19. The use of “and” in Neh 12:6, 9 was interpreted by some scholars to mean that Jehoiarib was added here. A similar problem is found in 1 Chr 9:10//Neh 11:10. See Gunneweg, Esra, 149; Böhler, Heilige Stadt, 358–59. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Honigmanonigman - 9780520275584.Indd9780520275584.Indd 1 228/06/148/06/14 2:382:38 PMPM 2 General Introduction
    General Introduction SUMMARY Th e fi rst and second books of Maccabees narrate events that occurred in Judea from the 170s through the 150s and eventually led to the rise of the Hasmonean dynasty: the toppling of the last high priest of the Oniad dynasty, the transforma- tion of Jerusalem into a Greek polis, Antiochos IV’s storming of Jerusalem, his desecration of the temple and his so-called persecution of the Jews, the liberation of the city and rededication of the temple altar by Judas Maccabee, the foundation of the commemorative festival of Hanukkah, and the subsequent wars against Seleukid troops. 1 Maccabees covers the deeds of Mattathias, the ancestor of the Maccabean/Hasmonean family, and his three sons, Judas, Jonathan, and Simon, taking its story down to the establishment of the dynastic transmission of power within the Hasmonean family when John, Simon’s son, succeeded his father; whereas 2 Maccabees, which starts from Heliodoros’s visit to Jerusalem under the high priest Onias III, focuses on Judas and the temple rededication, further dis- playing a pointed interest in the role of martyrs alongside that of Judas. Because of this diff erence in chronological scope and emphasis, it is usually considered that 1 Maccabees is a dynastic chronicle written by a court historian, whereas 2 Macca- bees is the work of a pious author whose attitude toward the Hasmoneans has been diversely appreciated—from mild support, through indiff erence, to hostility. Moreover, the place of redaction of 2 Maccabees, either Jerusalem or Alexandria, is debated. Both because of its comparatively fl amboyant style and the author’s alleged primarily religious concerns, 2 Maccabees is held as an unreliable source of evidence about the causes of the Judean revolt.
    [Show full text]
  • Out of Water Civilizations Emerge Focus on Pre-Islamic Persian Empires
    INFLUENCE OF WATER MANAGEMENT ON EMPIRES 1 Out of Water Civilizations Emerge Focus on Pre-Islamic Persian Empires Festival of the Passing of the Ice Dragon 8 April 2017 Pentathlon Entry - Literary Arts Research Paper INFLUENCE OF WATER MANAGEMENT ON EMPIRES 2 Abstract Water or the lack of it has the power to create or destroy empires. From prehistory to the current time period this has been shown to be true. The civilizations who have been able to harness water, transport it and conserve it are the societies that have risen to power. The Persian Empires, from the earliest to the last, were masters of water husbandry. They developed an underground transport system called qanats that enabled them to become one of the greatest empires the world has ever seen. Not only has their knowledge of water transport enabled the irrigation of fields, it provided water for domestic purposes in their homes, to air- condition their homes and allowed the use of sewage systems which helped to keep disease at bay. INFLUENCE OF WATER MANAGEMENT ON EMPIRES 3 Out of Water Civilizations Emerge – Focus on Pre-Islamic Persian Empires Water has controlled the rise and fall of great empires. Rome became a great power when it was able to harvest the water from the Mediterranean Sea, China’s Golden Age developed after the completion of the 1100 mile long Grand Canal for transport of goods and irrigation. Domination of the oceans by the Vikings gave rise to their success. Civilizations are driving by the way in which they respond to the challenges of their environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Minority and Majority the Samaritai{ High Priest Salãma B
    A CASE OF PALESTINIAN ARAB JUSTICE BETWEEN MINORITY AND MAJORITY THE SAMARITAI{ HIGH PRIEST SALÃMA B. S.ADAQA AND THE ARAB TAILORS OF NABLUS IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY Haseeb Shehadeh The fotlowing Arabic short story about the Samaritan high priest Salãma b. Ghazãl b. Isl.raq b. $adaqa (Shalmia b. Tabia b. Isaac b. Abraham b. Tsedaka) was written by the late high priest Ya.qüb b.,lJzzi in 1960.t salãma (17s4-1855) actually served as a high priest between the years 1799 and 1826 and all high priests who followed him were his offspring.' Aft"r the death of GhazãI, his father, i¡ 1787, the Samaritans lived about twelve years without a high priest because the only heir, his son Salãma, was too young to take the office of high priesthood.3 At the age of nine, the 20th of Jumãdãal-Ãkhira 1208 e.n' 23 Janrary 1793 a.o', the ¡*r ^-",tlf+!l^J f¡Jl¡-l¡ ¡¡*éL¡ il:lÍ'3 ¡¡À:¡U'¿*i¡L*ll 'ilf' ;g'rlr err+r.Lr ;,t ¿. L$s- -¡trLr:<rl ¡¡31 ¡+<,ar+LÍ3_a-¡-l¡-i,¡r¡r . \ i1 . [ *l-:tl] çrl-J I uein ¿.rtll I .+l< C I (Afterwards: Abù Shaff,|fre Book on the Samaritans). A copy ofthis hand-written book including 351 pages (the author's pagination is inaccurate) is preserved under the number 7036 in theYad p,enZii Library, Jerusalem. A brief description of the 98 Samaritan manuscripts prepared by the present writer in 1981 and in 1997 is available at theYad BenZvi Library. Ben-Zvi asked the priest this book, seel.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Assyrian Empire, the Conquest of Israel, and the Colonization of Judah 37 I
    ISRAEL AND EMPIRE ii ISRAEL AND EMPIRE A Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism Leo G. Perdue and Warren Carter Edited by Coleman A. Baker LONDON • NEW DELHI • NEW YORK • SYDNEY 1 Bloomsbury T&T Clark An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Imprint previously known as T&T Clark 50 Bedford Square 1385 Broadway London New York WC1B 3DP NY 10018 UK USA www.bloomsbury.com Bloomsbury, T&T Clark and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published 2015 © Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker, 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker have asserted their rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as Authors of this work. No responsibility for loss caused to any individual or organization acting on or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by Bloomsbury or the authors. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN: HB: 978-0-56705-409-8 PB: 978-0-56724-328-7 ePDF: 978-0-56728-051-0 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Typeset by Forthcoming Publications (www.forthpub.com) 1 Contents Abbreviations vii Preface ix Introduction: Empires, Colonies, and Postcolonial Interpretation 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report of the Study Concerning the Ordination of Women
    A Report of the Study Concerning the Ordination of Women Undertaken by the Anglican Mission in America (A Survey of the Leading Theological Convictions) Submitted by: Women’s Ordination Study Team The Rt. Rev. John H. Rodgers, Jr., Chairman July 31, 2003 © 2003 Anglican Mission in America Women’s Ordination Study 2 Women’s Ordination Study Table of Contents Introductory Matters Aim of the Study and Report .................................................................................................... 4 Historical Background ............................................................................................................ 4 Controversial Nature ............................................................................................................. 5 Scope and Limitations ............................................................................................................ 6 Presuppositions .................................................................................................................... 8 Structure ........................................................................................................................... 8 Report Part 1: The primary reasons for the ordination of women to the priesthood/ presbyterate and their consecration as bishops .......................................................................................................................... 9 Part 2: The primary reasons for a male priesthood/presbyterate and episcopate and against the ordination of women as priests/presbyters
    [Show full text]
  • Hanukah History
    A BRIEF HISTORY OF Chanukah More than a little oil – edited by Rabbi Ron Symons Alexander the Great conquered Israel in the 4 th century B.C.E. He was a benevolent ruler result of a vision he was said to have had before he began any battle. The story goes that upon entering Jerusalem, he was met by the High Priest, Shimon HaTzaddik. Before every battle, he saw his likeness in a vision. As a result, he cancelled taxes on the Jews during the Sabbatical year, offered animals in the Temple on his own behalf, and granted the Jews religious freedom. Conditions changed when Alexander died. His empire was divided among different generals. After a power struggle, Israel came under the control of the Seleucid Dynasty – Greek kings who ruled from Syria. Until this point, the major threat was spiritual annihilation resulting from Hellenization, the adaptation of Greek culture and philosophy (assimilation). Hellenization attacked the moral, ethical and religious fibre of Judaism. Many Jews resisted assimilation but many became ardent Hellenists. Under the Seleucid kings, this situation continued. With the rise of Antiochus IV both the spiritual and physical survival of the Jewish people was severely threatened. Sadly enough, Jewish Hellenists contributed towards Jewish destruction by complaining to the king that the pace of assimilation was not fast enough. Tragedy resulted. One man, named Joshua, or the Hellenized Jason, bribed the King into replacing the high priest and appointing him instead. This new “high-priest” erected a gymnasium near the Temple where the priests would go and play sports, thereby neglecting their duties.
    [Show full text]
  • Persian Empire Old Testament
    Persian Empire Old Testament Workmanlike and Adonic Ronnie relives her segregationist Clarice sorts and tittuped inflexibly. Aspen and healthful Pasquale frazzle her MacArthur constipate or caricature selectively. Is Thaddius left or ethnocentric when laths some sarangis reckon smack? Although old persian empire, persians their own region of compassion for it is on a symbol. It almost a theocratic Islamic republic in the Middle decrease in western Asia. Calls for us, in old testament have brought about persia in great empire once cyrus to iranian. Persia's earliest known kingdom was the proto-Elamite Empire followed by the Medes but it nearly the Achaemenid Empire that emerged under Cyrus the Great post is. Testament makes up in tomb inscriptions, but mercy has two parts, easily assign by the fact but each trip was reused separately as clear discrete inscription of Xerxes. The persians also an inscription. God keeps His promises. Median kingdom, and understand he characterizes as a apology and fall ruler. Esther 1 BiblePlacescom. What bare the Bible Say About Persia OpenBibleinfo. What was placed at his davidic theology a constant inspiration to know it is implied large storms destroyed and saw a theology, thus he dug trenches upstream and persian empire old testament. He was largely under the absorb the appropriate Court, thought off a time evolve the dispute of testimony attempt to restore the Persian dominion over Herat he maintained a natural friendly nature toward Great Britain. The looking was sometimes presented in a narrative cycle of varying length evidence in individual episodes. Cyrus thus founded the first Persian Empire The Archaemenian.
    [Show full text]
  • 2210 Bc 2200 Bc 2190 Bc 2180 Bc 2170 Bc 2160 Bc 2150 Bc 2140 Bc 2130 Bc 2120 Bc 2110 Bc 2100 Bc 2090 Bc
    2210 BC 2200 BC 2190 BC 2180 BC 2170 BC 2160 BC 2150 BC 2140 BC 2130 BC 2120 BC 2110 BC 2100 BC 2090 BC Fertile Crescent Igigi (2) Ur-Nammu Shulgi 2192-2190BC Dudu (20) Shar-kali-sharri Shu-Turul (14) 3rd Kingdom of 2112-2095BC (17) 2094-2047BC (47) 2189-2169BC 2217-2193BC (24) 2168-2154BC Ur 2112-2004BC Kingdom Of Akkad 2234-2154BC ( ) (2) Nanijum, Imi, Elulu Imta (3) 2117-2115BC 2190-2189BC (1) Ibranum (1) 2180-2177BC Inimabakesh (5) Ibate (3) Kurum (1) 2127-2124BC 2113-2112BC Inkishu (6) Shulme (6) 2153-2148BC Iarlagab (15) 2121-2120BC Puzur-Sin (7) Iarlaganda ( )(7) Kingdom Of Gutium 2177-2171BC 2165-2159BC 2142-2127BC 2110-2103BC 2103-2096BC (7) 2096-2089BC 2180-2089BC Nikillagah (6) Elulumesh (5) Igeshaush (6) 2171-2165BC 2159-2153BC 2148-2142BC Iarlagash (3) Irarum (2) Hablum (2) 2124-2121BC 2115-2113BC 2112-2110BC ( ) (3) Cainan 2610-2150BC (460 years) 2120-2117BC Shelah 2480-2047BC (403 years) Eber 2450-2020BC (430 years) Peleg 2416-2177BC (209 years) Reu 2386-2147BC (207 years) Serug 2354-2124BC (200 years) Nahor 2324-2176BC (199 years) Terah 2295-2090BC (205 years) Abraham 2165-1990BC (175) Genesis (Moses) 1)Neferkare, 2)Neferkare Neby, Neferkamin Anu (2) 3)Djedkare Shemay, 4)Neferkare 2169-2167BC 1)Meryhathor, 2)Neferkare, 3)Wahkare Achthoes III, 4)Marykare, 5)............. (All Dates Unknown) Khendu, 5)Meryenhor, 6)Neferkamin, Kakare Ibi (4) 7)Nykare, 8)Neferkare Tereru, 2167-2163 9)Neferkahor Neferkare (2) 10TH Dynasty (90) 2130-2040BC Merenre Antyemsaf II (All Dates Unknown) 2163-2161BC 1)Meryibre Achthoes I, 2)............., 3)Neferkare, 2184-2183BC (1) 4)Meryibre Achthoes II, 5)Setut, 6)............., Menkare Nitocris Neferkauhor (1) Wadjkare Pepysonbe 7)Mery-........, 8)Shed-........, 9)............., 2183-2181BC (2) 2161-2160BC Inyotef II (-1) 2173-2169BC (4) 10)............., 11)............., 12)User......
    [Show full text]
  • Eau Naturelle
    "PrayHeF; Excerpt from "Eau Naturelle." Photo: Elke Scholz, 1996 'Eau Naturelie' represents a photographic collaborationbetween Artists Elke Scholz and Zoya to honour the female form and spirit h Nature. Elke's work has been published and is included in collections h Canada, the U.S.,Africa, Australia, and Europe. An exhibition of her work, "A Pad of One Woman's Journey," will open at Chapel Galle~yh Bracebridge, April 3, 1997. VOLUME 17, NUMBER 1 5 Priestesses and "Sacred Prostitutes" Prostitutes could have been available for hire near temples in the ancient Eastern Mediterranean area, but the evidence on priestesses does not support the argumen t that Cet artarhckquestionne 'existence et hs liens mtre &spr~tresses, among them were "temple prostitutes." Further, the pres- &S nrltes smueh et h *prostitution sacrh a% lhncienne entation of "cult prostitutionn in the Hebrew Bible (Old MCdterrande orimtalc. Testament) seems to be partly responsible for the concept of "sacred prostitution." Priestesses in ancient Mesopotamia Sumerian kings appropriated a ritual that originalky installed a high priestess, in order to Rivkah Harris and other scholars have identified many Semitic and some Sumerian names for classes of priestess: asociate themselves with a Goddess'fertility, Her entu, naditu, ishtaritu, and qadishtu. These terms and power, and, to some extent, Her divinity. other information about Mesopotamian priestesses come from various places and periods, so that any generaliza- tions I make must be somewhat speculative. A deep concern for the fertility of land and people was The enta priestess, the Sumerian Nin-Dingir, meaning central to ritual activity in ancient Eastern Mediterranean "Lady Deity" or "Lady Who Is Goddess," was probably cultures, and, in some, cultic sexual intercourse consti- the "high priestess." She had elevated social status, but, in tuted the mythic and ritual expression of that concern.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond King Solomon's Harlots: Women in Evidence 65 S
    Ann Althouse, Beyond King Solomon's Harlots: Women in Evidence 65 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1265 (1992) BEYOND KING SOLOMON’s HARLOTS: WOMEN IN EVIDENCE Ann Althouse* 65 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1265 (1992)† There is a tradition of beginning the law school course on evidence with the Judgment of Solomon.1 The biblical version quoted by the casebook I use reads as follows: Then two harlots came to the king, and stood before him. The one woman said, “Oh, my lord, this woman and I dwell in the same house; and I gave birth to a child while she was in the house. Then on the third day after I was delivered, this woman also gave birth; and we were alone; there was no one else with us in the house, only we two were in the house. And this woman’s son died in the night because she lay on it. And she arose at midnight, and took my son from beside me, while your maidservant slept, and laid it in her bosom, and laid her dead son in my bosom. “When I rose in the morning to nurse my child, behold, it was dead; but when I looked at it closely in the morning, behold, it was not *1266 the child that I had borne.” But the other woman said, “No, the living child is mine, and the dead child is yours.” The first said, “No, the dead child is yours, and the living child is mine.” Thus they spoke before the king. Then the king said, “The one says, ‘This is my son that is alive, and your son is dead’; and the other says, ‘No, but your son is dead, and my son is the living one.’” And the king said, “Bring me a sword.” So a sword was brought before the king.
    [Show full text]
  • High Priests Garments and History
    THE HIGH PRIEST - GARMENTS AND HISTORY Historical Significance and Symbolism Joseph Martinez Manassas Chapter #81, RAM THE HIGH PRIEST • Brief Introduction • Appearance in the VSL • Garments – Biblical Explanations – Use in Royal Arch • Observations Joseph Martinez Manassas Chapter #81, RAM TRIVIA • Master of the Chapter – in United States – Excellent High Priest, King, and Scribe • In United Kingdom – First, Second, Third Principal • In Ireland – Excellent King, High Priest and Chief Scribe Joseph Martinez Manassas Chapter #81, RAM TRIVIA • In United Kingdom – First, Second, Third Principal – Most Excellent Zerubbabel Joseph Martinez Manassas Chapter #81, RAM THE HIGH PRIEST • Master of a Chapter • Member of the Grand Council • Past High Priest – Wears a distinctive Symbol Joseph Martinez Manassas Chapter #81, RAM ROYAL ARCH - HIGH PRIEST SYMBOL • Is the Breastplate of the High Priest of Israel • Described in Exodus 28 • Created in Exodus 39 • Worn by Aaron in Leviticus 8 Joseph Martinez Manassas Chapter #81, RAM THE HIGH PRIEST OF ISRAEL • Aaron was the first – Exodus 28 • Was to be successive through Aaron’s line – Aaron Eleazar Phinehas Abishua Bukki Uzzi – Ithamar Eli Ahitub Ahijah Ahimelech Abiathar • Solomon – Abiathar Zadok (High Priest at completion of the First Temple) Joseph Martinez Manassas Chapter #81, RAM THE FIRST TEMPLE • David – Abiathar and Zadok were High Priests in tandem • Solomon – When Adonijah tries to claim power and kingship • Abiathar sides with Adonijah’s camp – David near death proclaims Solomon
    [Show full text]
  • Zenobia Kozak Phd Thesis
    =><9<@6;4 @52 =.?@! =>2?2>B6;4 @52 3A@A>2 , />6@6?5 A;6B2>?6@C 52>[email protected] 0<8820@6<;? .;1 612;@6@C 9.>72@6;4 DIQRFME 7R\EN . @LIUMU ?WFPMVVIH JRT VLI 1IKTII RJ =L1 EV VLI AQMXITUMV[ RJ ?V# .QHTIYU '%%* 3WOO PIVEHEVE JRT VLMU MVIP MU EXEMOEFOI MQ >IUIETGL-?V.QHTIYU,3WOO@IZV EV, LVVS,$$TIUIETGL"TISRUMVRT[#UV"EQHTIYU#EG#WN$ =OIEUI WUI VLMU MHIQVMJMIT VR GMVI RT OMQN VR VLMU MVIP, LVVS,$$LHO#LEQHOI#QIV$&%%'($)%+ @LMU MVIP MU STRVIGVIH F[ RTMKMQEO GRS[TMKLV @LMU MVIP MU OMGIQUIH WQHIT E 0TIEVMXI 0RPPRQU 8MGIQUI Promoting the past, preserving the future: British university heritage collections and identity marketing Zenobia Rae Kozak PhD, Museum and Gallery Studies 20, November 2007 Table of Contents List of Figures………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….2 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations…………………………………………………………………………………......3 List of Appendices………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………………………………………5 Abstract……………………………………………………..………………………………………………………………………7 1. Introduction: the ‘crisis’ of university museums…………………………………………...8 1.1 UK reaction to the ‘crisis’…………………………………………………………………………………………………9 1.2 International reaction to the ‘crisis’…………………………………………………………………………………14 1.3 Universities, museums and collections in the UK………………………………………………………………17 1.3.1 20th-century literature review…………………………………………………………………………………19 1.4 The future of UK university museums and collections………………………………………………………24 1.4.1 Marketing university museums
    [Show full text]