DOCSLIB.ORG

Corrected Oral and Written Evidence on the Inquiry Into the Constitutional

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Corrected Oral and Written Evidence on the Inquiry Into the Constitutional SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION INQUIRY INTO THE CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF COALITION GOVERNMENT Oral and written evidence Contents Rt Hon. Lord Adonis—Oral Evidence (QQ 88-99) .................................................................. 3 Dr Stephen Barber, London South Bank University—Written evidence ............................... 16 Dr Andrew Blick, King’s College London—Written evidence ............................................... 29 Rt Hon. Paul Burstow MP, Rt Hon. Cheryl Gillan MP and Tim Loughton MP—Oral Evidence (QQ 58-73) .............................................................................................................................. 40 Rt Hon. Lord Butler of Brockwell, KG, GCB, CVO and Lord O’Donnell, GCB—Oral Evidence (QQ 111-120) ........................................................................................................... 58 Lord Donoughue and Professor Lord Norton of Louth—Oral Evidence (QQ 1-13) ........... 70 Rt Hon. Lord Falconer of Thoroton and Rt Hon. Baroness Royall of Blaisdon—Oral Evidence (QQ 121-131) ........................................................................................................... 86 Dr Ruth Fox, Hansard Society—Written evidence .............................................................. 100 Dr Ruth Fox, Professor Robert Hazell and Mr Barry Winetrobe—Oral Evidence (QQ 14-29) ................................................................................................................................................ 105 Rt Hon. Cheryl Gillan MP, Rt Hon. Paul Burstow MP and Tim Loughton MP—Oral Evidence (QQ 58-73) ............................................................................................................................ 125 Professor Robert Hazell, Constitution Unit, UCL—Written evidence ................................ 126 Professor Robert Hazell, Dr Ruth Fox and Mr Barry Winetrobe—Oral Evidence (QQ 14-29) ................................................................................................................................................ 134 Professor Robert Hazell, Constitution Unit, UCL—Supplementary written evidence ........ 135 Mr Ieuan Wyn Jones—Written evidence .............................................................................. 137 Mr Ieuan Wyn Jones, Rt Hon. Lord McConnell of Glenscorrodale, Rt Hon. Rhodri Morgan and Lord Stephen—Oral Evidence (QQ 100-110)................................................................ 143 Rt Hon. David Laws MP—Oral Evidence (QQ 44-57).......................................................... 156 Rt Hon. Oliver Letwin MP—Oral Evidence (QQ 132-140).................................................. 171 Rt Hon. Oliver Letwin MP, Minister for Government, Cabinet Office—Supplementary written evidence..................................................................................................................... 182 Tim Loughton MP, Rt Hon. Paul Burstow MP and Rt Hon. Cheryl Gillan MP—Oral Evidence (QQ 58-73) ............................................................................................................................ 184 Dr Felicity Matthews, The University of Sheffield—Written evidence................................. 185 Rt Hon. Lord McConnell of Glenscorrodale, Mr Ieuan Wyn Jones, Rt Hon. Rhodri Morgan and Lord Stephen—Oral Evidence (QQ 100-110)................................................................ 188 Rt Hon. Lord Adonis—Oral Evidence (QQ 88-99) Lord Morgan and Lord Steel of Aikwood—Oral Evidence (QQ 30-43) .............................. 189 Rt Hon. Rhodri Morgan—Written evidence ......................................................................... 206 Rt Hon. Rhodri Morgan, Mr Ieuan Wyn Jones, Rt Hon. Lord McConnell of Glenscorrodale, and Lord Stephen—Oral Evidence (QQ 100-110)................................................................ 208 Professor Lord Norton of Louth and Lord Donoughue—Oral Evidence (QQ 1-13) ......... 209 Lord O’Donnell, GCB and Rt Hon. Lord Butler of Brockwell, KG, GCB, CVO—Oral Evidence (QQ 111-120) ......................................................................................................... 210 Rt Hon. Peter Riddell, CBE, Institute for Government—Written evidence ........................ 211 Rt Hon. Baroness Royall of Blaisdon and Rt Hon. Lord Falconer of Thoroton—Oral Evidence (QQ 121-131) ......................................................................................................... 214 Rt Hon. Lord Shutt of Greetland, OBE and Rt Hon. Lord Strathclyde, CH—Oral Evidence (QQ 74-87) ............................................................................................................................ 215 Lord Steel of Aikwood and Lord Morgan—Oral Evidence (QQ 30-43) .............................. 228 Lord Stephen, Mr Ieuan Wyn Jones, Rt Hon. Lord McConnell of Glenscorrodale and Rt Hon. Rhodri Morgan —Oral Evidence (QQ 100-110)................................................................... 229 Rt Hon. Lord Strathclyde, CH and Rt Hon. Lord Shutt of Greetland, OBE—Oral Evidence (QQ 74-87) ............................................................................................................................ 230 Mr Barry Winetrobe, Dr Ruth Fox and Professor Robert Hazell—Oral Evidence (QQ 14-29) ................................................................................................................................................ 231 Mr Barry Winetrobe, Honorary Research Associate, Constitution Unit, UCL— Supplementary written evidence............................................................................................ 232 2 of 233 Rt Hon. Lord Adonis—Oral Evidence (QQ 88-99) Rt Hon. Lord Adonis—Oral Evidence (QQ 88-99) Evidence Session No. 6 Heard in Public Questions 74 - 99 WEDNESDAY 27 NOVEMBER 2013 Members present Baroness Jay of Paddington (chairman) Lord Crickhowell Lord Cullen of Whitekirk Baroness Falkner of Margravine Lord Hart of Chilton Lord Irvine of Lairg Lord Lang of Monkton Lord Lester of Herne Hill Lord Lexden Lord Powell of Bayswater Baroness Wheatcroft ________________ Examination of Witnesses Examination of Witness Rt Hon. Lord Adonis, member of Labour negotiation team after 2010 general election Q88 The Chairman: Thank you very much for arriving so promptly and for enabling us to proceed with a rather similar conversation, although we want to devote some time, if we can, to what you wrote about the formation of the coalition, as well as general points about its continuation and operation. We heard in the last session, and you were here for some of it, quite a lot of support for the idea of a coalition being a perfectly meaningful way of conducting government. You wrote in your book rather firmly, “As a necessity they can work … but for the two major parties, they are the product of electoral and policy failure”. Lord Adonis: I obviously agree with what I wrote. The Chairman: I wonder if you could expand on it. Lord Adonis: My view is pretty much in agreement with what I heard Lord Strathclyde say. For the two major parties, obviously their objective should be to win an election, in terms of winning the majority of seats. My view is that, having observed this coalition and experienced government myself including, taking up Lord Lester’s point, the fact that all parties are themselves to some extent coalitions and have to interact with other parties, it is better to have the clarity of a single-party government. Certainly the two major parties should make that their objective. 3 of 233 Rt Hon. Lord Adonis—Oral Evidence (QQ 88-99) However, what we have demonstrated in the past three and a half years is that it is perfectly possible to make a coalition work. Although that might seem a strange thing to say, given our history, in two senses there were big question marks. First, outside wartime we had not had a coalition since, being realistic about it, 1932. The 1930s are slightly debatable— whether you count it as a coalition going right through to 1939—but there was a meaningful coalition in 1931–32. Thereafter, it was essentially one-party government. We had not had a coalition outside wartime, so there was a question mark as to whether we could make it work effectively. There was also the precedent—and as somebody famously said, the only constitution that the English have is precedent—that, where elections do not yield a majority, minority governments are formed. That was the precedent of 1974, 1929 and 1923–24. There was a general expectation—an expectation I held—that if the election did not lead to a one-party majority, a minority government would be formed. It is clear now, on the basis of the past three and a half years, that we now have another precedent, which is a coalition that has functioned as a Government effectively for three and a half years. It looks as if it may do so through to the 2015 election. That, too, will be a precedent. I am struck by the fact that, alongside this coalition over the past three and a half years, there has been a certain amount of looking back on periods of single-party government, including that marvellous play at the National Theatre, This House. I am young enough not to have been around in the mid-1970s. Some members of the committee, including you, Lord Chairman, have personal memories of this time in government, not least because of your father leading the Government, which is the subject of the play. It is not clear to me that it is advantageous to have a minority government,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Opposition-Craft': an Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitte
    ‘Opposition-Craft’: An Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD The University of Leeds, School of Politics and International Studies May, 2020 1 Intellectual Property and Publications Statements The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. ©2020 The University of Leeds and Edward Henry Lack The right of Edward Henry Lack to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 2 Acknowledgements Page I would like to thank Dr Victoria Honeyman and Dr Timothy Heppell of the School of Politics and International Studies, The University of Leeds, for their support and guidance in the production of this work. I would also like to thank my partner, Dr Ben Ramm and my parents, David and Linden Lack, for their encouragement and belief in my efforts to undertake this project. Finally, I would like to acknowledge those who took part in the research for this PhD thesis: Lord David Steel, Lord David Owen, Lord Chris Smith, Lord Andrew Adonis, Lord David Blunkett and Dame Caroline Spelman. 3 Abstract This thesis offers a distinctive and innovative framework for the study of effective official opposition politics in the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • If the PDF Doesn't Load
    LLANDAFF CATHEDRAL SEVENTH SUNDAY of EASTER SUNDAY AFTER ASCENSION DAY 28 May 2017 7.30AM SAID MATINS Psalm: 47 8.00AM HOLY EUCHARIST President & Preacher: Canon Graham Holcombe 9.00AM PARISH EUCHARIST (followed by tea/coffee) President: Canon Graham Holcombe Preacher: Canon Stephen Ryan Readings & Offertory Procession: Judith Thompson 11.00AM CHORAL EUCHARIST Cavalli Missa pro defunctis President: Canon Graham Holcombe Preacher: Canon Stephen Ryan Anthem: Alleluia Sjöberg 12.30PM HOLY EUCHARIST {Lady Chapel} President: Reverend Bill Barlow 3.30PM CHORAL EVENSONG Sumsion in A Hymns: 500, 204(205) Psalm: 104(vv 26-37) Anthem: How lovely are thy dwellings Brahms We welcome our visiting choir, Uppsala Cathedral Choir at the 11.00am Eucharist and The Llandaff Cathedral Singers at 3.30pm Evensong New worshippers are especially welcome and are invited to make themselves known to the clergy Sunday 28 May 2017: THE SEVENTH SUNDAY OF EASTER Collect O God the King of glory, you have exalted your only Son Jesus Christ with great triumph to your kingdom in heaven: we beseech you, leave us not comfortless, but send your Holy Spirit to strengthen us and exalt us to the place where our Saviour Christ is gone before, who is alive and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever. Amen. A reading from Acts of the Apostles Acts 1. 6 –14 So when they had come together, they asked him, ‘Lord, is this the time when you will restore the kingdom to Israel?’ He replied, ‘It is not for you to know the times or periods that the Father has set by his own authority.
    [Show full text]
  • The House of Lords in 2005: a More Representative and Assertive Chamber?
    The House of Lords in 2005: A More Representative and Assertive Chamber? By Meg Russell and Maria Sciara February 2006 ISBN: 1 903 903 47 5 Published by The Constitution Unit School of Public Policy UCL (University College London) 29–30 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU Tel: 020 7679 4977 Fax: 020 7679 4978 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/ ©The Constitution Unit, UCL 2006 This report is sold subject to the condition that is shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. First Published February 2006 2 Contents Preface............................................................................................................................................................1 Summary of key points................................................................................................................................3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................5 Lords reform doesn’t happen (again)........................................................................................................5 Changing composition: a more representative chamber? ......................................................................7 The Prevention of Terrorism
    [Show full text]
  • What Happens After an Indecisive Election Result?
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 07163, 9 June 2017 What happens after an By Lucinda Maer indecisive election result? Gail Bartlett Inside: 1. Forming a government after a hung parliament 2. “Caretaker” administrations 3. The meeting of a new Parliament 4. The Queen’s Speech 5. An investiture vote? www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 07163, 9 June 2017 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Forming a government after a hung parliament 5 1.1 What kind of government can form? 5 1.2 Historical precedents 6 1.3 When should an incumbent Prime Minister resign? 7 1.4 How long does government formation take? 9 1.5 Internal party consultation 9 1.6 Role of the House of Commons 10 1.7 Effects of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 10 2. “Caretaker” administrations 12 2.1 What is a “caretaker” administration? 12 2.2 The nature of the restrictions on government action 12 2.3 When do the restrictions end? 13 3. The meeting of a new Parliament 15 3.1 When does a Parliament return? 15 4. The Queen’s Speech 17 4.1 When does the Queen’s Speech take place? 17 4.2 The debate on the Address 17 5. An investiture vote? 19 Cover page image copyright UK Parliament 3 What happens after an indecisive election result? Summary Following the 2017 general election, held on 8 June 2017, the Conservative Party was returned as the largest party, but did not have an overall majority in the House of Commons.
    [Show full text]
  • Backbench Business Committee Representations: Backbench Debates
    Backbench Business Committee Representations: Backbench Debates Tuesday 3 March 2020 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 3 March 2020. Watch the meeting Members present: Ian Mearns (Chair); Nickie Aiken; Bob Blackman; Fiona Bruce; Patricia Gibson; Nigel Mills; Lia Nici; Claudia Webbe. Questions 1-32 Members making representations I: Mr David Davis, Dr Julian Lewis and Ruth Cadbury. II: Crispin Blunt. III: Mr Kevan Jones. IV: Tim Loughton. Written evidence from witnesses: – [Add names of witnesses and hyperlink to submissions] Mr David Davis, Dr Julian Lewis and Ruth Cadbury made representations. Q1 Member Chair: Good afternoon and welcome to the first sitting of the Backbench Business Committee in the 2020-21 parliamentary Session. We have four applications this afternoon. The first is led by Mr David Davis, Ruth Cadbury and Dr Julian Lewis. Welcome to you all. The first application is on the loan charge, and the Amyas Morse review and subsequent Government action. Witness Mr Davis: Thank you, Mr Chairman. The loan charge is an important issue of natural justice, and it cuts across party divides. You will have seen that our 46 signatories include Conservatives, Labour, Lib Dems, SNP and DUP. We have had two previous debates on the charge, one in Westminster Hall and one in the main Chamber. The Westminster Hall debate was in 2018 and had, I think, 28 or 29 speakers. The main Chamber debate was on 4 April 2019 and also had 28 speakers, so there is a lot of interest in this. The reason for that is that it affects roughly 50,000 people, so lots of people in every constituency—I will not go into the details of the argument unless you want me to, Mr Chairman.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Sustainable Development and Children's Rights
    social sciences $€ £ ¥ Article Integrating Sustainable Development and Children’s Rights: A Case Study on Wales Rhian Croke 1,*, Helen Dale 2 , Ally Dunhill 3, Arwyn Roberts 2 , Malvika Unnithan 4 and Jane Williams 5 1 Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK 2 Lleisiau Bach/Little Voices, National Lottery People and Places Fund 2012-2020, Swansea and Bangor University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK; [email protected] (H.D.); [email protected] (A.R.) 3 Independent Consultant and Researcher, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 8TA, UK; [email protected] 4 Northumbria University Law School, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK; [email protected] 5 Observatory on the Human Rights of Children, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Abstract: The global disconnect between the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Conven- tion on the Rights of the Child (CRC), has been described as ‘a missed opportunity’. Since devolution, the Welsh Government has actively pursued a ‘sustainable development’ and a ‘children’s rights’ agenda. However, until recently, these separate agendas also did not contribute to each other, al- though they culminated in two radical and innovative pieces of legislation; the Rights of Children and Young Persons (Wales) Measure (2013) and the Well-being and Future Generations (Wales) Act (2015). This article offers a case study that draws upon the SDGs and the CRC and considers how recent Citation: Croke, Rhian, Helen Dale, Ally Dunhill, Arwyn Roberts, guidance to Welsh public bodies for implementation attempts to contribute to a more integrated Malvika Unnithan, and Jane Williams.
    [Show full text]
  • Spice Briefing
    MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY AND REGION Scottish SESSION 1 Parliament This Fact Sheet provides a list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the first parliamentary session, Fact sheet 12 May 1999-31 March 2003, arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represented. Each person in Scotland is represented by 8 MSPs – 1 constituency MSPs: Historical MSP and 7 regional MSPs. A region is a larger area which covers a Series number of constituencies. 30 March 2007 This Fact Sheet is divided into 2 parts. The first section, ‘MSPs by constituency’, lists the Scottish Parliament constituencies in alphabetical order with the MSP’s name, the party the MSP was elected to represent and the corresponding region. The second section, ‘MSPs by region’, lists the 8 political regions of Scotland in alphabetical order. It includes the name and party of the MSPs elected to represent each region. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party SSP Scottish Socialist Party 1 MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY: SESSION 1 Constituency MSP Region Aberdeen Central Lewis Macdonald (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen North Elaine Thomson (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen South Nicol Stephen (LD) North East Scotland Airdrie and Shotts Karen Whitefield (Lab) Central Scotland Angus Andrew Welsh (SNP) North East Scotland Argyll and Bute George Lyon (LD) Highlands & Islands Ayr John Scott (Con)1 South of Scotland Ayr Ian
    [Show full text]
  • Uk Government and Special Advisers
    UK GOVERNMENT AND SPECIAL ADVISERS April 2019 Housing Special Advisers Parliamentary Under Parliamentary Under Parliamentary Under Parliamentary Under INTERNATIONAL 10 DOWNING Toby Lloyd Samuel Coates Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Deputy Chief Whip STREET DEVELOPMENT Foreign Affairs/Global Salma Shah Rt Hon Tobias Ellwood MP Kwasi Kwarteng MP Jackie Doyle-Price MP Jake Berry MP Christopher Pincher MP Prime Minister Britain James Hedgeland Parliamentary Under Parliamentary Under Secretary of State Chief Whip (Lords) Rt Hon Theresa May MP Ed de Minckwitz Olivia Robey Secretary of State INTERNATIONAL Parliamentary Under Secretary of State and Minister for Women Stuart Andrew MP TRADE Secretary of State Heather Wheeler MP and Equalities Rt Hon Lord Taylor Chief of Staff Government Relations Minister of State Baroness Blackwood Rt Hon Penny of Holbeach CBE for Immigration Secretary of State and Parliamentary Under Mordaunt MP Gavin Barwell Special Adviser JUSTICE Deputy Chief Whip (Lords) (Attends Cabinet) President of the Board Secretary of State Deputy Chief of Staff Olivia Oates WORK AND Earl of Courtown Rt Hon Caroline Nokes MP of Trade Rishi Sunak MP Special Advisers Legislative Affairs Secretary of State PENSIONS JoJo Penn Rt Hon Dr Liam Fox MP Parliamentary Under Laura Round Joe Moor and Lord Chancellor SCOTLAND OFFICE Communications Special Adviser Rt Hon David Gauke MP Secretary of State Secretary of State Lynn Davidson Business Liason Special Advisers Rt Hon Amber Rudd MP Lord Bourne of
    [Show full text]
  • Reports to Conference
    Reports to Conference Spring Conference 2016 REPORTS TO CONFERENCE SPRING 2016 Contents Federal Conference Committee ........................................................... 2 Federal Policy Committee .................................................................... 6 Federal Executive .............................................................................. 10 Federal Finance & Administration Committee .................................... 18 Parliamentary Party Report (Commons) ............................................ 22 Parliamentary Party Report (Lords) ................................................... 24 Parliamentary Party Report (Europe) ................................................. 28 Diversity Engagement Group ............................................................. 31 Campaign for Gender Balance .......................................................... 35 Federal Appeals Panel ...................................................................... 38 Federal Conference Committee Bournemouth 2015 Last autumn we held our conference in Bournemouth. This proves to be one of the more popular venues we visit with 88% of members rating it as an excellent or good venue for an autumn conference. We asked attendees how they felt about the earlier finish time on the final day. 60% of those that responded said they preferred the earlier finish time with only 9% saying they preferred to break for lunch. Next autumn we are trialing greater use of the weekend (see below for details). We will continue to ask all attendees
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons for Civil Service Impartiality from the Scottish Independence Referendum
    House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee Lessons for Civil Service impartiality from the Scottish independence referendum Fifth Report of Session 2014–15 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 17 March 2015 HC 111 Published on 23 March 2015 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Public Administration Select Committee The Public Administration Select Committee (PASC) is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the reports of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and the Health Service Commissioner for England, which are laid before this House, and matters in connection therewith, and to consider matters relating to the quality and standards of administration provided by Civil Service departments, and other matters relating to the Civil Service. Current membership Mr Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, Harwich and North Essex) (Chair) Mr Nigel Evans MP (Conservative, Ribble Valley) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Mrs Cheryl Gillan MP (Conservative, Chesham and Amersham) Sheila Gilmore MP (Labour, Edinburgh East) David Heyes MP (Labour, Ashton under Lyne) Mr Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) Kelvin Hopkins MP (Labour, Luton North) Greg Mulholland MP (Liberal Democrat, Leeds North West) Lindsay Roy MP (Labour, Glenrothes) Mr Andrew Turner MP (Conservative, Isle of Wight) The following Members were also Members of the Committee during part of the inquiry: Alun Cairns MP (Conservative, Vale of Glamorgan) Robert Halfon MP (Conservative, Harlow) Priti Patel MP (Conservative, Witham) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberals in Coalition
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 72 / Autumn 2011 / £10.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Liberals in coalition Vernon Bogdanor Riding the tiger The Liberal experience of coalition government Ian Cawood A ‘distinction without a difference’? Liberal Unionists and Conservatives Kenneth O. Morgan Liberals in coalition, 1916–1922 David Dutton Liberalism and the National Government, 1931–1940 Matt Cole ‘Be careful what you wish for’ Lessons of the Lib–Lab Pact Liberal Democrat History Group 2 Journal of Liberal History 72 Autumn 2011 new book from tHe History Group for details, see back page Journal of Liberal History issue 72: Autumn 2011 The Journal of Liberal History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group. ISSN 1479-9642 Riding the tiger: the Liberal experience of 4 Editor: Duncan Brack coalition government Deputy Editor: Tom Kiehl Assistant Editor: Siobhan Vitelli Vernon Bogdanor introduces this special issue of the Journal Biographies Editor: Robert Ingham Reviews Editor: Dr Eugenio Biagini Coalition before 1886 10 Contributing Editors: Graham Lippiatt, Tony Little, York Membery Whigs, Peelites and Liberals: Angus Hawkins examines coalitions before 1886 Patrons A ‘distinction without a difference’? 14 Dr Eugenio Biagini; Professor Michael Freeden; Ian Cawood analyses how the Liberal Unionists maintained a distinctive Professor John Vincent identity from their Conservative allies, until coalition in 1895 Editorial Board The coalition of 1915–1916 26 Dr Malcolm Baines; Dr Roy Douglas; Dr Barry Doyle; Prelude to disaster: Ian Packer examines the Asquith coalition of 1915–16, Dr David Dutton; Prof. David Gowland; Prof. Richard which brought to an end the last solely Liberal government Grayson; Dr Michael Hart; Peter Hellyer; Dr J.
    [Show full text]