DOCSLIB.ORG

A Grammatical Sketch of Upper Necaxa Totonac

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Grammatical Sketch of Upper Necaxa Totonac A grammatical sketch of Upper Necaxa Totonac by David Beck University of Alberta Department of Linguistics 4-45 Assiniboia Hall Edmonton, AB T6G 2E7 Canada (780) 492-0807 FAX: (780) 492-0806 e-mail: [email protected] Table of Contents Abbreviations and symbols.......................................................................................... iii 0. Introduction....................................................................................................................4 1. Phonology ......................................................................................................................3 1.1. Consonants..........................................................................................................3 1.2. Vowels................................................................................................................3 1.3. Stress, tone, and prosody.....................................................................................4 1.4. Sound symbolism................................................................................................4 2. Morphology....................................................................................................................5 2.1. Noun...................................................................................................................5 2.1.1. Number...........................................................................................................6 2.1.2. Possession.......................................................................................................7 2.1.3. Pronouns .........................................................................................................9 2.1.3.1. Personal pronouns....................................................................................9 2.1.3.2. Determiners ...........................................................................................10 2.1.3.3. Interrogative and relative pronouns ........................................................10 2.1.4. Bodyparts......................................................................................................11 2.1.5. Locative nak= ...............................................................................................13 2.1.6. Determinative ßa- (DTV) ................................................................................14 2.1.7. li…- ‘GENERIC’ (GNC).......................................................................................15 2.1.8. ka…- ‘place of’ (PLC).......................................................................................16 2.2. Modifiers: Adjectives, adverbs, and numerals ...................................................17 2.2.1. Adjectives .....................................................................................................17 2.2.1.1. lak-/laÓ÷- ‘ADJECTIVAL PLURAL’ (APL)......................................................20 2.2.1.2. a…- ‘ADDITIVE’ (ADD) ..............................................................................21 2.2.1.3. -wa ‘SEMBLATIVE’ (SEM) ........................................................................21 2.2.2. Adverbs and ideophones................................................................................22 2.2.3. Numerals and numeral classifiers ..................................................................26 2.3. Verb..................................................................................................................28 2.3.1. Person-affixes ...............................................................................................28 2.3.1.1. Subject-markers .....................................................................................28 2.3.1.2. Object-markers ......................................................................................30 2.3.1.3. Indefinite actors .....................................................................................31 2.3.2. Tense ............................................................................................................32 2.3.3. Aspect...........................................................................................................33 2.3.3.1. Imperfective...........................................................................................33 2.3.3.2. Perfective...............................................................................................35 2.3.3.3. Perfect ...................................................................................................38 2.3.3.4 Progressive ...............................................................................................i 2.3.3.5. Stative verbs ..........................................................................................41 2.3.4. Mood ............................................................................................................45 2.3.4.1. Optative .................................................................................................45 2.3.4.2. Unrealized..............................................................................................48 2.3.4.3. Counterfactual........................................................................................51 2.3.5. Valency-altering affixes ................................................................................52 2.3.5.1. Causatives..............................................................................................52 2.3.5.2. Applicatives...........................................................................................58 2.3.5.3. Valency-reducers ...................................................................................64 2.3.6. Bodypart prefixes..........................................................................................70 2.3.7. Quasi-inflectional affixes ..............................................................................73 2.3.7.1. -pa…lá… ‘REPETITIVE’ (RPT).......................................................................73 2.3.7.2. -÷o ‘all, completely’ ...............................................................................74 2.3.7.3. -te…¬á ‘AMBULATIVE’ (AMB) ....................................................................75 2.3.7.4. te…- ‘in passing’ (PATH)...........................................................................76 2.3.7.5. ki…- ‘ROUNDTRIP’ (RT) .............................................................................77 2.3.7.6. -tßá ‘DISTAL’ (DST) .................................................................................77 2.3.7.7. -tßi ‘PROXIMAL’ (PRX) .............................................................................79 2.3.7.8. -kutún ‘DESIDERATIVE’ (DSD)..................................................................79 2.3.7.9. -eÓ… ‘OBLIGATION’ (OBG)...........................................................................80 2.3.7.10. maÓ÷- ‘in the domain of others’ (AJENO)...................................................80 2.3.7.11. lak-/laÓ÷- ‘DISTRIBUTIVE’ (DTB)................................................................81 2.3.7.12. ÷a…- ‘SIMULTANEOUS’ (SMT)....................................................................83 2.3.8. Derivation from verbs ...................................................................................83 2.3.8.1. -niÔ ‘DEVERBATIVE’ (DVB)........................................................................83 2.3.8.2. Prosodic apophony.................................................................................88 2.3.8.3. -(V)t ‘NOMINALIZER’ (NM) ......................................................................90 2.3.8.4. Instrumental nominalization...................................................................90 2.3.8.5. -nV ÂÓ ‘AGENTIVE NOMINALIZER’ (AGT).......................................................91 3. Syntax ..........................................................................................................................92 3.1. Simple sentence ................................................................................................92 3.1.1. Copular clauses .............................................................................................93 3.1.2. Negation........................................................................................................95 3.1.3. Questions ......................................................................................................96 3.2. Complex sentences............................................................................................97 3.2.1. Coordination .................................................................................................97 3.2.2. Subordination................................................................................................98 3.2.2.1. Relative clauses......................................................................................98 3.2.2.2. Complement clauses ............................................................................100 3.2.2.3. Adverbial clauses.................................................................................102 4. Sample text: “The story of a nagual” ..........................................................................106 Bibliography..............................................................................................................112 ii Abbreviations and symbols 1, 2, 3 = first-, second-, third-person LOC = locative ADD = additive MTV
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Knowledge of Skull Base Anatomy and Surgical Implications of Human Sacrifice Among Pre-Columbian Mesoamerican Cultures
    See the corresponding retraction, DOI: 10.3171/2018.5.FOCUS12120r, for full details. Neurosurg Focus 33 (2):E1, 2012 Knowledge of skull base anatomy and surgical implications of human sacrifice among pre-Columbian Mesoamerican cultures RAUL LOPEZ-SERNA, M.D.,1 JUAN LUIS GOMEZ-AMADOR, M.D.,1 JUAN BArgES-COLL, M.D.,1 NICASIO ArrIADA-MENDICOA, M.D.,1 SAMUEL ROMERO-VArgAS, M.D., M.SC.,2 MIGUEL RAMOS-PEEK, M.D.,1 MIGUEL ANGEL CELIS-LOPEZ, M.D.,1 ROGELIO REVUELTA-GUTIErrEZ, M.D.,1 AND LESLY PORTOCArrERO-ORTIZ, M.D., M.SC.3 1Department of Neurosurgery, Instituto Nacional de Neurologia y Neurocirugia “Manuel Velasco Suárez;” 2Department of Spine Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación; and 3Department of Neuroendocrinology, Instituto Nacional de Neurologia y Neurocirugia “Manuel Velasco Suárez,” Mexico City, Mexico Human sacrifice became a common cultural trait during the advanced phases of Mesoamerican civilizations. This phenomenon, influenced by complex religious beliefs, included several practices such as decapitation, cranial deformation, and the use of human cranial bones for skull mask manufacturing. Archaeological evidence suggests that all of these practices required specialized knowledge of skull base and upper cervical anatomy. The authors con- ducted a systematic search for information on skull base anatomical and surgical knowledge among Mesoamerican civilizations. A detailed exposition of these results is presented, along with some interesting information extracted from historical documents and pictorial codices to provide a better understanding of skull base surgical practices among these cultures. Paleoforensic evidence from the Great Temple of Tenochtitlan indicates that Aztec priests used a specialized decapitation technique, based on a deep anatomical knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • La Huasteca: Correlations of Linguistic and Archaeological Data
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Calgary (Working) Papers in Linguistics Volume 11, Summer 1985 1985-06 La Huasteca: correlations of linguistic and archaeological data Thompson, Marc University of Calgary Thompson, M. (1985). La Huasteca: correlations of linguistic and archaeological data. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics, 11(Summer), 15-25. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/51328 journal article Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca I I La Rua•tec:&: Con:elatiou of Li1S9Ubtic and Archaeoloqical Data I Marc Thompson Introduction I In modern Mexico and Guatemala there are between 2 and 2.5 million speakers of 28 Mayan lanCJU&qes. As a qroup they rank next to Quechua speakers of Peru and Equador as one of the most I impressive survivinq Amerindian linquistic and cultural units in the western hemisphere (Voqt 1969). As qeoqraphy and modern distribution suqqest, with the exception of the HUastecs, various Maya qroups have been in contact for many centuries. Linquists qenerally define three major subqroups of Mayan: l) Huastecan, I 2) Yucatecan and 3) southern Mayan. Today, Huastecan speakers are comprised of two linquistic units: l) Veracruzano, distributed alonq the tropical coastlands, and I 2) Potosino, spoken in the interior hiqhlands, correspondinq to the states of Veracruz, and San Luis Potosi, Mexico, respectively. Modern distribution of Huastacan speakers is represented by small, rather nucleated vestiqes of Precollllllbian territories: I "Only five towns in northern Veracruz and an equal nlllllber in Potosi could boast a population of l8 per cent or more Huastec­ speakinq inhabitants, and no town reqistered over 72 per cent.
    [Show full text]
  • A Linguistic Look at the Olmecs Author(S): Lyle Campbell and Terrence Kaufman Source: American Antiquity, Vol
    Society for American Archaeology A Linguistic Look at the Olmecs Author(s): Lyle Campbell and Terrence Kaufman Source: American Antiquity, Vol. 41, No. 1 (Jan., 1976), pp. 80-89 Published by: Society for American Archaeology Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/279044 Accessed: 24/02/2010 18:09 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=sam. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Society for American Archaeology is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Antiquity. http://www.jstor.org 80 AMERICAN ANTIQUITY [Vol. 41, No. 1, 1976] Palomino, Aquiles Smith, Augustus Ledyard, and Alfred V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Christianization of the Nahua and Totonac in the Sierra Norte De
    Contents Illustrations ix Foreword by Alfredo López Austin xvii Acknowledgments xxvii Chapter 1. Converting the Indians in Sixteenth- Century Central Mexico to Christianity 1 Arrival of the Franciscan Missionaries 5 Conversion and the Theory of “Cultural Fatigue” 18 Chapter 2. From Spiritual Conquest to Parish Administration in Colonial Central Mexico 25 Partial Survival of the Ancient Calendar 31 Life in the Indian Parishes of Colonial Central Mexico 32 Chapter 3. A Trilingual, Traditionalist Indigenous Area in the Sierra Norte de Puebla 37 Regional History 40 Three Languages with a Shared Totonac Substratum 48 v Contents Chapter 4. Introduction of Christianity in the Sierra Norte de Puebla 53 Chapter 5. Local Religious Crises in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries 63 Andrés Mixcoatl 63 Juan, Cacique of Matlatlán 67 Miguel del Águila, Cacique of Xicotepec 70 Pagan Festivals in Tutotepec 71 Gregorio Juan 74 Chapter 6. The Tutotepec Otomí Rebellion, 1766–1769 81 The Facts 81 Discussion and Interpretation 98 Chapter 7. Contemporary Traditions in the Sierra Norte de Puebla 129 Worship of Tutelary Mountains 130 Shrines and Sacred Constructions 135 Chapter 8. Sacred Drums, Teponaztli, and Idols from the Sierra Norte de Puebla 147 The Huehuetl, or Vertical Drum 147 The Teponaztli, or Female Drum 154 Ancient and Recent Idols in Shrines 173 Chapter 9. Traditional Indigenous Festivities in the Sierra Norte de Puebla 179 The Ancient Festival of San Juan Techachalco at Xicotepec 179 The Annual Festivity of the Tepetzintla Totonacs 185 Memories of Annual Festivities in Other Villages 198 Conclusions 203 Chapter 10. Elements and Accessories of Traditional Native Ceremonies 213 Oblations and Accompanying Rites 213 Prayers, Singing, Music, and Dancing 217 Ritual Idols and Figurines 220 Other Ritual Accessories 225 Chapter 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Relative Clauses in Upper Necaxa Totonac: Local, Comparative, and Diachronic Perspectives1
    Relative clauses in Upper Necaxa Totonac: Local, comparative, and diachronic perspectives1 David Beck University of Alberta Relativization strategies in the Totonacan family are largely undescribed, but detailed examination of one of the languages in the group, Upper Necaxa Totonac, reveals the presence of both externally- and internally-headed relative constructions. Also of note is the presence of relativizers that mark the animacy (human/non-human) of the head of the relative construction. This paper will show that, while phylogenetic evidence clearly demonstrates the relativizers to be descended diachronically from interrogative pronouns, they are best treated synchronically as complementizers, an analysis that follows directly from the presence of internally-headed relative constructions. Totonacan languages are spoken by approximately 240,000 people (INEGI 2010) living in an area of east-central Mexico centred on northern Puebla State and including adjacent parts of Hidalgo and Veracruz (see Figure 1; languages dealt with directly in this paper are shown in red). The family is generally considered an isolate; however, recent work has suggested links to Mixe-Zoque (Brown et al. 2011) and Chitimacha (Brown et al. 2014). Although the family has only recently become the object of serious investigation and description, the focus has been largely on its (admittedly spectacular) morphology; little has been written about syntax, and even less about the structure of complex clauses. Relative clauses in particular seem to have been given short shrift—which is surprising, given that from what we do know about them they seem to have some unusual properties. Consider the example in (1) from Upper Necaxa Totonac, the language for which we currently have the most data on relativization:2 1 I would like to thank my consultants in Patla and Chicontla, especially Porfirio Sampayo Macín and Longino Barragán Sampayo, for their help putting this paper together.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 ANTHROPOLOGY 140G – MESOAMERICAN COSMOVISION and CULTURE GFS 106, M/W 2:00-3:20 Dr. Kenneth E. Seligson TA: Dr. Kirby Farah
    Anth 140 Course Syllabus Fall 2018 ANTHROPOLOGY 140g – MESOAMERICAN COSMOVISION AND CULTURE GFS 106, M/W 2:00-3:20 Dr. Kenneth E. Seligson TA: Dr. Kirby Farah Phone: (213) 740-1902 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Office Hours: M 12-2 Office Hours: M/W 12-1 Office: THH B8 Office: HNB (Hedco) 29A Course Description Anthropology 140g provides a general introduction to the ancient civilizations of Mesoamerica and the ways in which they are studied. The emphasis in the course is on understanding how different societies manifested a core set of beliefs shared by all Mesoamerican civilizations while at the same time maintaining local cultural identities. The course addresses changes in Mesoamerica both spatially and temporally from the Archaic Period through the Spanish Conquest. Throughout the course, there will be a general emphasis on broad themes such as religion, identity, and political organization and how these themes are detected and presented by scholars of Mesoamerican civilizations. Recommended Preparation An introductory archaeology course would be helpful, but is not required. The aims of this course are threefold: 1) To introduce you to the major cultures and time periods of Mesoamerica. 2) To help you critically examine the different ways in which scholars interpret the past. 3) To encourage you to think openly about Mesoamerican civilizations and to create your own arguments about the past. This last aim is a critical component of the course and there will be many opportunities to demonstrate this ability. 1 Anth 140 Course Syllabus Fall 2018 Introduction, Objectives, and Outcomes Mesoamerica is one of the great culture areas of the ancient and modern world.
    [Show full text]
  • On the External Relations of Purepecha: an Investigation Into Classification, Contact and Patterns of Word Formation Kate Bellamy
    On the external relations of Purepecha: An investigation into classification, contact and patterns of word formation Kate Bellamy To cite this version: Kate Bellamy. On the external relations of Purepecha: An investigation into classification, contact and patterns of word formation. Linguistics. Leiden University, 2018. English. tel-03280941 HAL Id: tel-03280941 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03280941 Submitted on 7 Jul 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/61624 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Bellamy, K.R. Title: On the external relations of Purepecha : an investigation into classification, contact and patterns of word formation Issue Date: 2018-04-26 On the external relations of Purepecha An investigation into classification, contact and patterns of word formation Published by LOT Telephone: +31 30 253 6111 Trans 10 3512 JK Utrecht Email: [email protected] The Netherlands http://www.lotschool.nl Cover illustration: Kate Bellamy. ISBN: 978-94-6093-282-3 NUR 616 Copyright © 2018: Kate Bellamy. All rights reserved. On the external relations of Purepecha An investigation into classification, contact and patterns of word formation PROEFSCHRIFT te verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof.
    [Show full text]
  • The Investigation of Teotihuacan Iconography Has Made Considerable Progress
    Thomas S. Barthei DECIPHERING TEOTIHUACAN WRITING Teotihuacán ha sido considerado, hasta ahora, como una cultura "sin escritura". De un examen detenido de grafemas sistemáticamente ordenados resultó que se presentan — dentro de la iconografía — "textos" legítimos. Se revelan reglas de composición y una "sintaxis". El desciframiento del grafema to habla en favor de la hipótesis de que se trata de una base lingüística en proto-nahua. La escritura teotihuaoana existía, por lo menos, desde el siglo cuatro al siglo siete de nuestra era. The investigation of Teotihuacan iconography has made considerable progress. Both in substance and in methodology a degree of maturity has been reached which is beginning to lead to a detailed synthesis. Less satisfactory is research on the problem of whether the Teotihuacanos did possess a writing system of its own. Vague arguments for and against seem to counterbalance each other; serious studies remain deplorably sporadic. What Clara Millón wrote about "the state of our ignorance about Teoti- huacan writing" still holds true, namely that "the Teotihuacan writing system never has received the decades of expert study devoted to Maya writing" (Millón 1973: 306). This thoughtprovoking essay, however, had already recognized a spectrum of substantial and essential questions in need of solution. First of all one has to find out whether there are any configurations among the iconographic wealth of welldefined signs which might be con- sidered to represent true "texts". Contemporary writing systems in Meso- INDIANA 11, Berlin 1987 america built up their texts according to the rule of vertical arrangement and by Unkage with calendarical statements. Furthermore the early writ- ing of the Zapotees and Maya is characterized by a preference for com- bining "text" and picture, i.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Interaction and Biological Distance Among Postclassic Mexican Populations Corey Steven Ragsdale
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Anthropology ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-1-2015 Cultural interaction and biological distance among Postclassic Mexican populations Corey Steven Ragsdale Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/anth_etds Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Ragsdale, Corey Steven. "Cultural interaction and biological distance among Postclassic Mexican populations." (2015). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/anth_etds/55 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i Corey Steven Ragsdale Candidate Anthropology Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Heather JH Edgar, Chairperson Osbjorn Pearson Hillard Kaplan Andrea Cucina Frances Berdan ii CULTURAL INTERACTION AND BIOLOGICAL DISTANCE AMONG POSTCLASSIC MEXICAN POPULATIONS by COREY STEVEN RAGSDALE B.A., Anthropology, California State University, San Bernardino 2009 M.S., Biological Anthropology, University of New Mexico, 2012 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Anthropology The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico May, 2015 iii CULTURAL INTERACTION AND BIOLOGICAL DISTANCE AMONG POSTCLASSIC MEXICAN POPULATIONS by Corey Steven Ragsdale B.A., Anthropology, California State University, San Bernardino 2009 M.S., Anthropology, University of New Mexico, 2012 Ph.D., Anthropology, University of New Mexico, 2015 ABSTRACT Human population structure is influenced by cultural and biological interactions. Little is known regarding to what extent cultural interactions effect biological processes such as migration and genetic exchange among prehistoric populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Language EI Country Genetic Unit Speakers RI Acatepec Tlapanec 5
    Language EI Country Genetic Unit Speakers RI Acatepec Tlapanec 5 Mexico Subtiapa-Tlapanec 33000 1 Alacatlatzala Mixtec 4.5 Mexico Mixtecan 23000 2 Alcozauca Mixtec 5 Mexico Mixtecan 10000 3 Aloápam Zapotec 4 Mexico Zapotecan 2100 4 Amatlán Zapotec 5 Mexico Zapotecan 6000 5 Amoltepec Mixtec 3 Mexico Mixtecan 6000 6 Ascunción Mixtepec Zapotec 1 Mexico Zapotecan 100 7 Atatláhuca Mixtec 5 Mexico Mixtecan 8300 8 Ayautla Mazatec 5 Mexico Popolocan 3500 9 Ayoquesco Zapotec 3 Mexico Zapotecan < 900 10 Ayutla Mixtec 5 Mexico Mixtecan 8500 11 Azoyú Tlapanec 1 Mexico Subtiapa-Tlapanec < 680 12 Aztingo Matlatzinca 1 Mexico Otopamean > < 100 13 Matlatzincan Cacaloxtepec Mixtec 2.5 Mexico Mixtecan < 850 14 Cajonos Zapotec 4 Mexico Zapotecan 5000 15 Central Hausteca Nahuatl 5 Mexico Uto-Aztecan 200000 16 Central Nahuatl 3 Mexico Uto-Aztecan 40000 17 Central Pame 4 Mexico Pamean 4350 18 Central Puebla Nahuatl 4.5 Mexico Uto-Aztecan 16000 19 Chaopan Zapotec 5 Mexico Zapotecan 24000 20 Chayuco Mixtec 5 Mexico Mixtecan 30000 21 Chazumba Mixtec 2 Mexico Mixtecan < 2,500 22 Chiapanec 1 Mexico Chiapanec-Mangue < 20 23 Chicahuaxtla Triqui 5 Mexico Mixtecan 6000 24 Chichicapan Zapotec 4 Mexico Zapotecan 4000 25 Chichimeca-Jonaz 3 Mexico Otopamean > < 200 26 Chichimec Chigmecatitlan Mixtec 3 Mexico Mixtecan 1600 27 Chiltepec Chinantec 3 Mexico Chinantecan < 1,000 28 Chimalapa Zoque 3.5 Mexico Zoque 4500 29 Chiquihuitlán Mazatec 3.5 Mexico Popolocan 2500 30 Chochotec 3 Mexico Popolocan 770 31 Coatecas Altas Zapotec 4 Mexico Zapotecan 5000 32 Coatepec Nahuatl 2.5
    [Show full text]
  • Laryngealization in Upper Necaxa Totonac Rebekka Puderbaugh
    Laryngealization in Upper Necaxa Totonac by Rebekka Puderbaugh A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Linguistics University of Alberta Examining committee: Dr. Anja Arnhold, Supervisor Dr. David Beck, Supervisor Dr. Benjamin V. Tucker, Examiner Dr. Stephanie Archer, Examiner Dr. Ryan Shosted, External examiner Dr. John Nychka, Pro Dean © Rebekka Puderbaugh, 2019 Abstract This dissertation examines laryngealization contrasts in vowels and fricatives in Upper Necaxa Totonac. In vowels the contrast is presumed to be realized as a form of non- modal phonation, while fricatives are supposed to differ according to their production mechanism. The goal of this dissertation is to provide evidence that will help to deter- mine whether the phonetic characteristics of these sounds align with the impressionistic descriptions of their phonological categories. Laryngealization categories were first examined via a corpus analysis in Chapter 3. The analysis revealed a highly frequent co-occurrence of laryngealized vowels and following glottal stops. No relationship was found between vowel laryngealization and ejective fricatives. In Chapter 4 an analysis of the difference in amplitude between the first and second harmonics (H1-H2) in laryngealized and non-laryngealized vowels showed that H1-H2 values were not influenced by vowel laryngealization categories, but were influenced the presence of a glottal stop following the vowel. This finding suggests that the laryngealization contrast neutralizes in vowels before glottal stops. In order to consider the potentially glottalic nature of ejective fricatives in UNT, Chapter 5 compared durations of phonetic events that occur during fricative production, including oral closure and frication.
    [Show full text]
  • The Numeral System of Purepecha: Historical and Typological Perspectives Kate Bellamy
    The numeral system of Purepecha: Historical and typological perspectives Kate Bellamy To cite this version: Kate Bellamy. The numeral system of Purepecha: Historical and typological perspectives. STUF, Akademie Verlag, In press, 4. halshs-03280910 HAL Id: halshs-03280910 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03280910 Submitted on 7 Jul 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Bellamy, Kate. 2021. The numeral system of Purepecha: Historical and typological perspectives. STUF - Language Typology & Universals 4. The Numeral System of Purepecha: Historical and Typological Perspectives1 Abstract The internal structure of numeral systems can shed light on processes of word formation, language contact and change. In this article I analyse the numeral system of Purepecha, a language isolate spoken in Michoacán (western Mexico), on the basis of historical and contemporary sources. The Purepecha system is unusual both typologically and areally since (i) it possesses monolexemic terms up to six, while seven to nine are compounds with five; and (ii) the forms for the base (20) and next power (400) have clear non-corporeal meanings, related instead to a configuration of objects and the notion of ‘living’, respectively.
    [Show full text]