ITALY Local Single Sky Implementation Level 1 - Implementation Overview
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
of ATM Implementation Reporting 25YEARS in Europe EUROCONTROL LSSIP 2018 - ITALY Local Single Sky ImPlementation Level 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2018 for Italy Infocentre Reference 19/02/05/23 Date of Edition 07/05/2019 LSSIP Focal Point Andrea Ruzzolini - [email protected] LSSIP Contact Person Bernd Hill - [email protected] Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip Reference Documents LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip LSSIP Guidance http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip Material Master Plan Level 3 – http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european-atm-master-plan-level-3- Plan Edition 2018 implementation-plan Master Plan Level 3 – http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european-atm-master-plan-level-3- Report Year 2018 implementation-report European ATM Portal https://www.eatmportal.eu and http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor Acronyms and https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official- abbreviations documents/guidance/Glossaries.pdf National AIP http://www.enav.it FAB Performance Plan http://www.bluemed.aero/index.php LSSIP Year 2018 Italy Released Issue CONTENTS 1. National ATM Environment ............................................................ 6 1.1. Geographical Scope ............................................................................................ 6 1.2. National Stakeholders ...................................................................................... 12 2. Traffic and Capacity ...................................................................... 22 Evolution of traffic in Italy ................................................................................ 22 ACC Brindisi ....................................................................................................... 23 ACC Milan ......................................................................................................... 27 ACC Padova ....................................................................................................... 31 ACC Rome ......................................................................................................... 35 3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions ............. 39 4. Implementation Projects .............................................................. 40 National projects .............................................................................................. 40 FAB projects ...................................................................................................... 40 5. Cooperation activities ................................................................... 43 FAB Co-ordination............................................................................................. 43 Regional cooperation ........................................................................................ 45 6. Implementation Objectives Progress ............................................ 47 State View ......................................................................................................... 47 Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................. 53 Annexes Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Italy National stakeholders’ organisation charts Implementation Objectives’ links with SESAR, ICAO and DP Glossary of abbreviations LSSIP Year 2018 Italy Released Issue Executive Summary National ATM Context Italy is one of the founding member of European Union and member of EUROCONTROL since 1996. The separation between the regulatory and the ATM service provider functions is effectively in place in Italy since 2004. ENAC, the Italian Civil Aviation Authority, has been appointed as regulator and National Supervisory Authority in November 2004 with dedicated law 265/2004. This appointment has been included in the code of Air Law (change to Italian Navigation Code) in Italy - issued in June 2005 -. ENAC is also responsible for the regulation for environmental matters in ATM. ENAV SpA is the Company designated by the Italian State for the management and control of general air traffic (GAT) in Italy. ENAV S.p.A. is a result of the transformation of the National Agency for Flight Assistance into a joint-stock Company which occurred in 2001, after the previous transformation into a State-Controlled Enterprise in 1996. In 2016 ENAV was listed on the stock exchange, rising from the status of a single member company to subsidiary company. It is controlled for the 53,4% by the Ministry of Economy and Finance and supervised by the Ministry of Infrastructures and Transport. Italian Air Force (ITAF) reports to the Ministry of Defence. ITAF has adapted its organisational structure in order to generate functional separation between the high level body Air Force Staff (SMA UCAM – Ufficio Circolazione Aerea Militare) accountable for services’ internal supervision and the units responsible for the provision of Air Navigation Services (Major Commands). In accordance with the European Community Regulation 550/2004, article 7, paragraph 5, the Italian Air Force is authorised to provide ATS, CNS and MET Services to General Air Traffic (GAT) without certification. ANS to GAT are provided by ITAF under the supervision of ENAC and in accordance with a special agreement signed by the two organizations. Traffic and Capacity Traffic in Italy increased by 5.8% during Summer 2018 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period during 2017. It is expected to be 5.8% for the whole of 2018. The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 0.8% and 4.1%, with a baseline growth of 2.4% for Italy during the 2019 to 2024 planning cycle. For Brindisi ACC, Padova ACC and Rome ACC, the average en-route delay per flight remained at zero during summer 2018, the same as during summer 2017. No problems are foreseen for Brindisi ACC, Padova ACC and Rome ACC during the 2019 to 2024 planning cycle. Capacity enhancement measures planned are in the order of fine-tuning existing capacity and to improvement of Flight Efficiency. For Milan ACC, the average en-route delay per flight increased from zero minutes per flight in Summer 2017 to 0.09 minutes per flight during Summer 2018. 35% of the delays were due Weather and 65% due to Other (Marseille ACC disruption). Depending on the re-distribution of traffic linked to eNM/ANSPs measures planned for summer 2019, Milan ACC could deliver additional capacity to cope with a traffic increase in line with the current route profile. Therefore, no capacity issues are foreseen for Milan ACC during the 2019 to 2024 planning cycle. LSSIP Year 2018 Italy 1 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter 6.1 (PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest are considered SESAR baseline); note that two objectives – AOM19.1 and FCM05 – are considered as both part of the SESAR baseline and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases. The objectives declared ‘Achieved’ in previous editions (up to, and including, ATM MP L3 Edition 2011-2017) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State. IMPORTANT: It has to be noted that the progress on PCP implementation shown throughout this document is just an assumption based on PCP-related implementation objectives. The real status of progress made by Italian stakeholders in the implementation of PCP Regulation is reported in Deployment Programme Monitoring View. Pre-SESAR 2010 2019 Implementation 76% PCP 2015 2023 Implementation 28% Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements (see note above). The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. Advanced Air Traffic Enabling Aviation Optimised ATM Services High Performing Infrastructure Network Services Airport Operations 82% 79% 70% 72% 61% 19% 12% 12% PCP PCP PCP PCP SESAR SESAR SESAR SESAR - - - - Pre Pre Pre Pre ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Blocks 0 and 1. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 6.1. 2010 2018 Block 0 80% 2015 2022 Block 1 37% LSSIP Year 2018 Italy 2 Released Issue ATM Deployment Outlook ● State objectives Deployed in 2017-2018: By 12/2019 By 12/2020 By 12/2021 2022+ - AMHS - Surveillance Performance - Pre-defined Airspace - 8,33 kHz below FL195 [COM10] 92% progress & Interoperability Configurations [ITY-AGVCS2] 80% progress - Data Link [ITY-SPI] 88% progress [AOM19.4] 55% progress - SWIM Yellow TI Profile [ITY-AGDL] 91% progress - Aircraft Identification - MTCD & CORA [INF08.1] 16% progress - OAT and GAT handling [ITY-ACID] 77% progress [ATC12.1] 54% progress [AOM13.1] 85% progress - Enhanced STCA for TMAs - Ground-Based Safety Nets - Aeronautical Information [ATC02.9] 48% progress [ATC02.8] 52% progress [ITY-ADQ] 78% progress - NewPENS - Coordination