DOCSLIB.ORG

Soil Survey of Scott County, Mississippi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soil Survey of Scott County, Mississippi United States In cooperation with Department of the USDA Forest Service, Agriculture the Mississippi Agricultural and Soil Survey of Forestry Experiment Station, the Scott County Soil and Water Scott County, Conservation District, and the Scott County Board of Natural Supervisors Mississippi Resources Conservation Service How To Use This Soil Survey This document provides text and tables that describe the soils in the survey area. A symbol is assigned to each soil. The symbol relates the text and tables to soil maps. The soil maps are available online from the Web Soil Survey (http://websoilsurvey. nrcs.usda.gov/). Select the area for which you would like a soil map using the Area of Interest tab. After defining your area of interest, click on the Soil Map tab to view or print a soil map. Note the map unit symbols on the soil map. Turn to the Contents in this document. The Contents lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. It also shows which tables have data on specific land uses for each detailed soil map unit and lists other sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. i National Cooperative Soil Survey This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the USDA Forest Service, the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, the Scott County Soil and Water Conservation District, and the Scott County Board of Supervisors. The survey is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Scott County Soil and Water Conservation District. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 2008. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 2008. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 2007. The most current official data are available at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. Nondiscrimination Statement The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Citation The correct citation for this survey is as follows: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2010. Soil Survey of Scott County, Mississippi. http://soils.usda.gov/survey/ printed_surveys/. Cover Caption An area of Ruston fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded.This soil is commonly used for hay production. Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available online from the Natural Resources Conservation Service at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov. ii Contents How To Use This Soil Survey ......................................................................................i Foreword ..................................................................................................................... vii General Nature of the County.........................................................................................1 History of Forestland ..................................................................................................2 Climate .......................................................................................................................3 How This Survey Was Made ..........................................................................................3 Detailed Soil Map Units ................................................................................................5 Ad—Adaton silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes ..............................................................6 Bb—Bibb fine sandy loam, frequently flooded ...........................................................9 BdA—Bude silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes .............................................................11 FaA—Falkner silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes .........................................................14 FaB—Falkner silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes .........................................................16 FrB—Freest fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes ................................................19 FrC—Freest fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes ................................................21 Gb—Gillsburg silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded .......................24 Ho—Houlka silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded .................27 IcB—Ichusa silty clay loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes ...................................................29 IcC—Ichusa silty clay loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes ...................................................32 JKB—Jena-Kirkville-Kinston complex, undulating, frequently flooded .....................35 Kn—Kinston loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently flooded ..................................38 KpB—Kipling silty clay loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes .................................................40 KpC2—Kipling silty clay loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded ..................................43 KpD2—Kipling silty clay loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes, eroded ................................45 Kr—Kirkville fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ..............47 LuA—Louin silty clay, 0 to 2 percent slopes .............................................................50 Ma—Mantachie fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ........53 MgD3—Maytag clay, 3 to 12 percent slopes, severely eroded ................................55 OrB—Ora fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes ....................................................58 OrC2—Ora fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded ....................................61 OrD2—Ora fine sandy loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes, eroded ..................................64 PeA—Pelahatchie silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ..................................................67 PeB—Pelahatchie silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes ..................................................70 Po—Pits-Udorthents complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes, eroded ...............................73 PrB—Providence silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes ....................................................74 PrC2—Providence silt loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded .....................................76 QuA—Quitman loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes .............................................................79 Rb—Rosebloom silt loam, ponded ...........................................................................82 RK—Rosebloom and Arkabutla soils, frequently flooded .........................................84 RuB—Ruston fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes ..............................................87 RuC2—Ruston fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded ..............................89 SaB—Savannah fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes .........................................91 SaC2—Savannah fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded ..........................94 SmD2—Smithdale fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded .......................97 SmF2—Smithdale fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes, eroded .....................99 iii Soil Survey of Scott County, Mississippi SsD2—Smithdale-Sweatman complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes, eroded ................102 SsF2—Smithdale-Sweatman complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, eroded ..............105 St—Stough fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ...............................................108 SwD2—Sweatman fine sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes, eroded .................... 111 SwF2—Sweatman fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes ................................113 Ur—Urbo silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ...................116 Prime Farmland ........................................................................................................119 Use and Management of the Soils .........................................................................121 Interpretive Ratings ................................................................................................121 Crops and Pasture .................................................................................................122 Yields per Acre ...................................................................................................122 Land Capability Classification ............................................................................124 Forestland Productivity and Management ..............................................................125
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Municipal Minutes, City of Picayune
    243 MUNICIPAL MINUTES, CITY OF PICAYUNE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COUNTY OF PEARL RIVER CITY OF PICAYUNE Be It Remembered that the Mayor and Council of the City of Picayune, in Pearl River County , Mississippi met in the City Hall in said City January 5, 1965 at 7:00 P. M. in regular session with the following officials present: Granville H. Williams , Mayor; A. H. Knight, 0. V. Lewis, F. G. Macdonald, Jr. and H. H. Pepper, Coun- •| 1 cilmen; A. J. Read, City Manager; A. L. Franklin, City Clerk; M. T. Thigpen, City Attorney and 0. L. Harris, Police Chief. It being determined that a quorum was present, the Mayor declared the meeting open and the following proceedings were had and done: BILLS ALLOWED 1 TO: ACCT. FOR'.:. AMOUNT WARRANT NO. NUMBER SUPERVISION AND FINANCE Granville H. Williams 201 December salary 92.49 27172 A. H. Knight 202 Same 41.31 27173 0. V. Lewis 202 Same 41.31 27174 F. G. Macdonald, Jr. 202 Same 41.31 27175 H. H. Pepper 202 Same 41.31 27176 A. J. Read 203 Same 157.30 27177 A. L. Franklin 204 Same 159.88 27178 John Paul Russ 205 Same 419.74 27179 Commercial Printing Co. 206 Inv. 14734 62.00 27168 City Stationery Co. 207 Inv. 7386,7508,7520,8089-Supplies 48.55 27169 Rapid Reproductions, Inc. 207 Inv 1610, 4083 1.51 27170 Heber Ladner, Sec. of State 207 Fee-Filing amendment to Charter of Inc. 10.00 27171 SMC Corporation 207 Maint. contract 47.00 27204 N. C. Rouse, Chancery Clerk 207 Cert, copies of City limits extension 9.00 27206 The Picayune Item 208 Account 1,093.50 27207 PROTECTION OF LIFE AND PROPERTY M.
    [Show full text]
  • Baria COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE for SENATE BILL NO. 2949 an ACT TO
    MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2011 By: Senator(s) Baria To: Highways and Transportation COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 2949 1 AN ACT TO DESIGNATE A CERTAIN SEGMENT OF ROAD IN HANCOCK 2 COUNTY AS AN OFFICIAL MISSISSIPPI SCENIC BYWAY TO BE KNOWN AS THE 3 "BEACH BOULEVARD SCENIC BYWAY"; TO DESIGNATE CERTAIN SEGMENTS OF 4 HIGHWAYS, ROADS AND STREETS IN HANCOCK COUNTY AS OFFICIAL 5 MISSISSIPPI SCENIC BYWAYS TO BE KNOWN AS THE "SCENIC BYWAYS TO 6 SPACE"; AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES. 7 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI: 8 SECTION 1. The following highways, roads or streets located 9 in the State of Mississippi are hereby designated as an official 10 Mississippi Scenic Byway to be known as the "Beach Boulevard 11 Scenic Byway" pursuant to Section 65-41-1 et seq.: 12 Beginning at Cedar Point in Hancock County and traveling 13 southerly along the coastline to Bayou Cadet in Hancock County. 14 SECTION 2. The following highways, roads or streets located 15 in the State of Mississippi are hereby designated as an official 16 Mississippi Scenic Byway to be known as the "Scenic Byways to 17 Space" pursuant to Section 65-41-1 et seq.: 18 (a) To be known as "NASA Scenic Byway to Space": 19 Beginning at the intersection of the 4-lane portion of Mississippi 20 Highway 607 with Mississippi Highway 604 and continuing northerly 21 on Mississippi Highway 607 to the south gate of Stennis Space 22 Center as well as exiting the north gate of Stennis Space Center 23 on Mississippi Highway 607 to the edge of Texas Flat Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal and Contract Documents
    SM No. CER0003011091 PROPOSAL AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF (NONEXEMPT) 1 Repairing or replacing traffic signals on US Highway 90, MS. Highway 43, and Highway 603, known as Federal Aid Project Nos. ER-0003-01(109) / 104569307 & NH-0003-01(109) / 104569312, in the County of Hancock, State of Mississippi. Project Completion: 135 Time Units NOTICE BIDDERS MUST PURCHASE A BOUND PROPOSAL FROM MDOT CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DIVISION TO BID ON THIS PROJECT. Electronic addendum updates will be posted on www.goMDOT.com SECTION 900 OF THE CURRENT (2004) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI BIDDER CHECK LIST (FOR INFORMATION ONLY) ______ All unit prices and item totals have been entered in accordance with Subsection 102.06 of the Mississippi Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. ______ If the bid sheets were prepared using MDOT’s Electronic Bid System, proposal sheets have been stapled and inserted into the proposal package. ______ First sheet of SECTION 905--PROPOSAL has been completed. ______ Second sheet of SECTION 905--PROPOSAL has been completed and signed. ______ Addenda, if any, have been acknowledged. Second sheet of Section 905 listing the addendum number has been substituted for the original second sheet of Section 905. Substituted second sheet of Section 905 has been properly completed, signed, and added to the proposal. ______ DBE/WBE percentage, when required by contract, has been entered on last sheet of the bid sheets of SECTION 905 - PROPOSAL. ______ Form OCR-485, when required by contract, has been completed and signed. ______ The last sheet of the bid sheets of SECTION 905--PROPOSAL has been signed.
    [Show full text]
  • Representatives Currie, Miles HOUSE BILL NO. 1279
    MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2020 By: Representatives Currie, Miles To: Transportation; Appropriations HOUSE BILL NO. 1279 (As Sent to Governor) 1 AN ACT TO DESIGNATE A SEGMENT OF U.S. HIGHWAY 51 IN LINCOLN 2 COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, IN MEMORY OF FALLEN BROOKHAVEN POLICE 3 OFFICERS CORPORAL WALTER ZACHERY "ZACH" MOAK AND OFFICER JAMES 4 KEVIN WHITE; TO DESIGNATE A SEGMENT OF MISSISSIPPI HIGHWAY 589 IN 5 LAMAR COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, IN MEMORY OF FALLEN HATTIESBURG POLICE 6 OFFICER BENJAMIN J. DEEN; TO DESIGNATE A SEGMENT OF U.S. HIGHWAY 7 50 IN LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, AS THE "SENATOR WILLIAM 'BILL' 8 CANON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY"; TO DESIGNATE A SEGMENT OF U.S. HIGHWAY 11 9 IN JONES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, AS THE "COACH ELMER HIGGINBOTHAM 10 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY"; TO DESIGNATE A SEGMENT OF U.S. HIGHWAY 45 IN 11 ALCORN COUNTY AND PRENTISS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, AS THE "SPEAKER 12 WILLIAM J. 'BILLY' MCCOY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY"; TO DESIGNATE A SEGMENT 13 OF MISSISSIPPI HIGHWAY 35 IN JEFFERSON DAVIS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, 14 AS THE "H.D. BROOME MEMORIAL HIGHWAY"; TO DESIGNATE A SEGMENT OF 15 MISSISSIPPI HIGHWAY 371 IN ITAWAMBA COUNTY AS THE "JEFF BOREN 16 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY"; TO DESIGNATE A SEGMENT OF MISSISSIPPI HIGHWAY 17 16 IN LEAKE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, AS THE "BLAKE BURGESS MEMORIAL 18 HIGHWAY"; TO DESIGNATE A SEGMENT OF MISSISSIPPI HIGHWAY 42 IN 19 GREENE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, AS THE "PINEY WOODS CREEK MEMORIAL 20 HIGHWAY IN RECOGNITION EOW APRIL 1, 1921, DEPUTY U.S. MARSHAL JAKE 21 GREEN AND GREENE COUNTY DEPUTY LAWRENCE DUNNAM"; TO AUTHORIZE A 22
    [Show full text]
  • MDOT Annual Report 2001
    The Mississippi Department of Transportation Annual Report 2001 The Mississippi Department of Transportation Annual Report 2001 Our Mission 2 A Note from the Executive Director 3 Our Goals 4 Section I - The Department Administration 5 Organizational Chart 6 Executive Summary 7 Section II - Financial Report Section III - Maintenance Expenditures by County and Project Section IV - Construction Expenditures by County and Project Section V - Contracts Awarded by Commissioner Districts and by Month Cover photograph by Glenn S Smith Mississippi Department of Transportation ANNUAL REPORT 2001 Our Mission The Mississippi Department of Transportation is responsible for providing a safe intermodal transportation network that is planned, designed, constructed, and maintained in an effective, cost-efficient and environmentally- sensitive manner% 2 Mississippi Department of Transportation ANNUAL REPORT 2001 important in keeping Mississippi alive economically As the lead transportation agency in the state, MDOT is moving forward with long- range, innovative transportation programs that keep our economy strong Over the last fiscal year, the Transportation Commission awarded approximately $415 million in transportation work This is the second highest amount awarded in the past twelve years, and it is a substantial A Note from amount for a state our size to invest in our transportation system We need a balance to continue strengthening our water and air ports, the Executive rails and highways, while maintaining the investments we have already made
    [Show full text]
  • CJL MBMMAS03 04 /21/2020 13:35 Board Minutes Minute Book Text Detail Book 0209 Page 362 OPENING for APRIL 20, 2020 Date 4 /20/20
    CJL MBMMAS03 04 /21/2020 13:35 Board Minutes PAGE 2 Minute Book Text Detail Book 0209 Page 362 OPENING FOR APRIL 20, 2020 Date 4/20/2020 AGENDA FOR APRIL 20, 2020 APRIL 20, 2020 The Board of Supervisors met at 9:00 a. m. the 20th day of April, 2020, in the Supervisors Board Room, in the Pearl River County Courthouse Complex in the City of Poplarville, Mississippi, with the following members of said Board and officers of said County were present to-wit: President, Sandy Kane Smith, member from District Five; Vice President, Malcolm Perry, member from District Two; Donald Hart, member from District One; Hudson Holliday, member from District Three; Jason Spence, member from District Four; County Administrator, Adrain Lumpkin, Jr. ; Board Attorney, Joe Montgomery; Chancery Clerk, Melinda Bowman; Joe Quave representing Sheriff. The following proceedings were had and entered of record to-wit: Pearl River County PEARLRIVER Board of Supervisors PEARL RIVER COUNTY Meeting Agenda COUNTY �M!SS!SSlrrl � M1SSISSI!'PI • �:.t. I H!HI � April ,,,to 1!l1K! � • 20, 2020 Welcome & Call to Order A.M. 9:00 Claims Docket: Consider approving 01) Consider Amendments to Agenda 02) Sheriff 03) A. Personnel B. Travel to pick up donated K-9 to San Antonio, TX on April 22-23, 2020 C. Consider executing Grants - FY2l Impaired Driving and Occupant Protection Consent Agenda Items: 04) A. Consider partial payment for furniture at the Annex B. Personnel in Planning & Development C. Chancery Clerk request for destruction of Redeemed Tax Sale Notices D. Acknowledge Proof of Publication - Inspection dates for Litter Collectors and Haulers E.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Electronic Packet
    OFFICIAL ELECTRONIC PACKET CITY OF STARKVILLE, MISSISSIPPI AUGUST 5, 2014 OFFICIAL AGENDA THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF STARKVILLE, MISSISSIPPI REGULAR MEETING OF TUESDAY, AUGUST 5, 2014 5:30 P.M., COURT ROOM, CITY HALL 101 EAST LAMPKIN STREET PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ARE HIGHLIGHTED AND PROVIDED AS APPENDIX A ATTACHED I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND A MOMENT OF SILENCE III. APPROVAL OF THE OFFICIAL AGENDA A. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. IV. APPROVAL OF BOARD OF ALDERMEN MINUTES CONSIDERATION OF THE MAY 6, 2014 MINUTES OF THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF STARKVILLE, MS AS REVIEWED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. CONSIDERATION OF THE JULY 28, 2014 MINUTES OF THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF STARKVILLE, MS AS REVIEWED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. V. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND COMMENTS A. MAYOR’S COMMENTS: NEW EMPLOYEE INTRODUCTIONS: ASHLEY WIGGLESWORTH – DEPUTY CLERK/AP B. BOARD OF ALDERMEN COMMENTS: VI. CITIZEN COMMENTS VII. PUBLIC APPEARANCES A PUBLIC APPEARANCE AND QUARTERLY REPORT BY PARK COMMISSIONER DAN MORELAND AND PARK AND RECREATION DIRECTOR HERMAN PETERS. VIII. PUBLIC HEARING A 2ND PUBLIC HEARING ON POTENTIAL CHANGES TO THE LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AS RECOMMENDED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR WILLIAM “BUDDY” SANDERS AND CITY PLANNER DANIEL HAVELIN. IX. MAYOR’S BUSINESS X. BOARD BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF ENTERING INTO PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR ACQUISITION OF CADENCE PORPERTY. B. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE INTENTION OF THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF STARKVILLE, MISSISSIPPI, TO SUPPORT THE FINANCING, DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF AN INDUSTRIAL PARK AND RELATED MATTERS.
    [Show full text]
  • 2030 Comprehensive Plan
    2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2012 Comprehensive Plan Town of Smithville, Mississippi Gregg Kennedy, Mayor Board of Aldermen: Planning Commission: Johnny Snow, Deputy Mayor Jill Dabbs Ruth Whitehead Renee Seales Joyce Avery Vicki Simmons Hansel Hood Carol Herren Jimmy Dabbs W. D. Holcomb J. W. Vann Town Clerk: Ann Seales Earl Wayne Cowley Funded by: Appalachian Regional Council Plan Developed by: Table of Contents Chapters and Sections Page Chapter One: Introduction and Community Profile 1 Section 1 Purpose 1 Section 2 Authority 1 Section 3 Location of Smithville and Study Area 2 Section 4 History of Smithville and Monroe County 2 Section 5 Planning Process 3 Section 6 Integration of other Plans, Studies and Surveys 3 Section 7 Sustainable Redevelopment in Smithville 4 Section 8 Population and Housing 5 Section 9 Recent Development 6 Section 10 Other Demographic Information 6 Section 11 Plan Organization 6 Chapter Two: Goals and Objective 7 Section 1 General Description 7 Section 2 Land Use and Development 8 Section 3 Transportation--Streets, Multi-Use Trails and Sidewalks 10 Section 4 Community Services and Facilities 11 Section 5 Recreational Facilities 12 Chapter Three: Land Use and Development 13 Section 1 General Description 13 Section 2 Prior and Existing Uses of Land 13 Section 3 Residential Issues and Opportunities 17 Section 4 Commercial Issues and Opportunities 18 Smithville, Mississippi Page i Comprehensive Plan Table of Contents Section 5 Recreational/Open Space Issues and Opportunities 19 Section 6 Economic Development and Future
    [Show full text]
  • OCT -12007 National Park Service NATIONAL K,;:Ik C&Ivlcc NATIONAL REGISTER of HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 1
    EIVED 2280 NPSForml 0-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior OCT -12007 National Park Service NATIONAL K,;:iK c&ivlCc NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: luka Battlefield other names/site number N/A 2. Location street & number: North of Mississippi Hwy 72 West of Mississippi Hwy 25 not for publication __ city or town: luka vicinity _ state: Mississippi code: MS county: Tishomingo code: 141 zip code: 38852 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant X nationally _ statewide locally. ( „ Sef6sontinuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official Da State Historic Preservation Officer State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property __ meets does not meet the National Register criteria. (__ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. yWational Park Service Certification I, hereby certify that this property is: V entered in the National Register, _ See continuation sheet. __ determined eligible for the National Register _ See continuation sheet. __ determined not eligible for the National Register __ removed from the National Register __ other (explain): __________ 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Designation of Critical Habitat for Three Threatened Mussels and Eight Endangered Mussels in the Mobile River Basin; Proposed Rule
    Wednesday, March 26, 2003 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Designation of Critical Habitat for Three Threatened Mussels and Eight Endangered Mussels in the Mobile River Basin; Proposed Rule VerDate Jan<31>2003 20:22 Mar 25, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\26MRP2.SGM 26MRP2 14752 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 58 / Wednesday, March 26, 2003 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR on the economic and other impacts of clubshell (Pleurobema decisum), dark the designation. We will conduct an pigtoe (Pleurobema furvum), southern Fish and Wildlife Service analysis of the economic impacts of pigtoe (Pleurobema georgianum), ovate designating these areas as critical clubshell (Pleurobema perovatum), 50 CFR Part 17 habitat prior to a final determination. triangular kidneyshell (Ptychobranchus RIN 1018–AI73 That economic analysis will be greeni), upland combshell (Epioblasma conducted in a manner that is consistent metastriata), and southern acornshell Endangered and Threatened Wildlife with the ruling of the 10th Circuit Court (Epioblasma othcaloogensis). Unionid and Plants; Proposed Designation of of Appeals in N.M. Cattle Growers Ass’n mussels, in general, live embedded in Critical Habitat for Three Threatened v. USFWS. When the draft economic the bottom (sand, gravel, and/or cobble Mussels and Eight Endangered analysis is completed, we will announce substrates) of rivers, streams, and other Mussels in the Mobile River Basin its availability with a notice in the bodies of water. These mussels siphon Federal Register. With publication of water into their shells and across four AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, the notice of availability, a comment gills that are specialized for respiration Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (Yellow..., 7 N.R.C
    In the Matter of TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (Yellow..., 7 N.R.C. 215 (1978) In the Matter of TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2) NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD LBP–78–7 Docket Nos. STN 50–566, STN 50–567 February 3, 1978 **1 *215 John M. Frysiak, Chairman; Lester Kornblith; Oscar H. Paris *216 Appearances James F. Burger, Esq., W. Walter LaRoche, Esq., and Alvin Gutterman, Esq., for the Applicant. Aubrey Godwin, Director, Division of Radiological Health, for the State of Alabama Department of Public Health. Eddie Fuente, Esq., Division of Radiological Health, for the State of Mississippi State Board of Health. Edward Ketchen, Esq., and Robert Mitchell, Esq., for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The Licensing Board issues a partial initial decision, making findings of fact and conclusions of law and authorizing the issuance of a limited work authorization pursuant to 10 CFR § 50.10(e), subject to certain terms and conditions. FWPCA: EPA AUTHORITY Although the staff unquestionably has authority to impose certain monitoring requirements, the authority does not extend to matters within the jurisdiction of the EPA (which has authority over effluent limitations pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (FWPCA)). NEPA: COST-BENEFIT BALANCE The staff must consider adverse effects on the aquatic environment in its NEPA cost-benefit balance, although it cannot require monitoring which is otherwise within the jurisdiction of the EPA Administrator. TECHNICAL ISSUES DISCUSSED: Table S–3, radon–222; cooling water intake system; seismology. PARTIAL INITIAL DECISION (Limited Work Authorization) *217 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Triangle Planning and Development Distirct
    Golden Triangle Planning & Development District Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 2018-2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.................................................................................................... 1 Summary Background ..................................................................................... 3 SWOT Analysis ................................................................................................ 9 Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................... 13 Public/Private Partnership .............................................................................. 16 Strategic Projects, Programs, and Activities .................................................... 17 Action Plan ................................................................................................... 18 Performance Measures .................................................................................. 19 Economic Resiliency ...................................................................................... 21 Planning ....................................................................................................... 22 Development Strategy ................................................................................... 23 Evaluation .................................................................................................... 26 Public Notice ................................................................................................. 29
    [Show full text]