Feeding Strategies in Teleost Fishes BIOE 127 Summer 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Feeding Strategies in Teleost Fishes BIOE 127 Summer 2015 Vikram B. Baliga Ecology & Evolutionary Biology UC Santa Cruz Environment Characteristic Air Water Density 1.21 kg m-3 1.024 x 103 kg m-3 Dynamic Viscosity 18.08 x 10 -6 Pa*s 1.07 x 10 -3 Pa*s O2-Carrying Capacity 95% less than air Thermal Conductivity 23 x air Human Skull Fish Skull 44 bony elements at birth # of bones varies widely among species 22 bones as an adult Typically 30 to 60 bones Very little kinesis Highly kinetic Aquatic prey capture suction ram manipulation (biting) Liem, 1980 Steven Day Tim Higham Roi Holzmann Kristen Bishop Lepomis macrochirus DPIV Experiments DPIV: Flow Velocity Hydrodynamics of Suction Feeding (Day et al. 2005) I. Flow = symmetrical II. Velocity decreases drastically away from the mouth III. Fluid speed is only significant within 1 mouth diameter How Polypterus Conserved? Morphological Diversity Seahorses Mastacembalus Anguilla Catfishes Cichlids Three Major Feeding Categories in the Aquatic Environment 1) Inertial suction Not 2) Ram Feeding Mutually Exclusive 3) Manipulation Feeding Mechanisms Body Ram Suction Jaw Ram Jaw Ram Necessitates Jaw Protrusion Jaw Protrusion Extremes Why might jaw protrusion have evolved? 1. Sneak up on your prey 2. Increase forces exerted on your prey Research on Jaw Protrusion • Accelerates the water around the prey • Increase by up to 35% the total force exerted on attached, escaping and free-floating passive prey • the strike. Feeding Mechanisms Body Pure Ram Ram Suction Jaw Ram Pure Ram Strategy Feeding Mechanisms Body Pure Ram Ram Suction Jaw Ram Biting Extending the Strike Ram Biters Biting Diversity Model Jaw Closing 3rd order lever 0 1 Speed Force MA jaw –closing Needlefish 0.04 (Strongylura incisa) Gar 0.051 (Lepisosteus osseus) Barracuda 0.27 (Sphyraena barracuda) Queen trigger 0.43 (Balistes vetula) Summary Functional Roles of Suction 1. Respiration 2. Prey Capture 3. Prey Transport Gill Filaments 4,5 Prey Transport Mouth -> -> -> Branchial Arches -> oesophagus Sciaenops ocellatus -Red Drum Grubich and Westneat. 2006. Journal of Anatomy 1: 79-92 Pharyngeal Musculature Pharyngeal Jaw Epibranchial Pharyngobranchial ceratobranchial Pharyngeal Diversity (a) Papilliform –plant shredding (b) Molariform- crushing snails Snakes Mehta & Burghardt, 2008; Mehta 2009 Cundall &Greene, 2000 Elongate Limb-reduced Forms Teleost Phylogeny Anguilliforms Morays • ~ 200 species • Complete limb loss • Coral reefs Snakes Morays • Elongate & limbless • Can attain large sizes • Obligate predators/ Consume large prey whole • Affect local prey densities How do morays consume large prey whole in the aquatic environment? Moray Skull What consequences do these features have on feeding behavior? Can morays generate suction? Pressure Data • Muraena retifera • Micropterus salmoides kPa = -1 kPa = -8 Mehta, unpubl data. Biters use suction to transport prey Inertial Feeding Pharyngeal Jaws Halichoeres bivittatus Morphological & Functional Innovation Prey Transport Behavior Thank you UCLA HARVARD LABORATORIES Feeding Mechanisms Body Pure Ram Ram Suction Jaw Ram Biting .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Article Evolutionary Dynamics of the OR Gene Repertoire in Teleost Fishes
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.09.434524; this version posted March 10, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Article Evolutionary dynamics of the OR gene repertoire in teleost fishes: evidence of an association with changes in olfactory epithelium shape Maxime Policarpo1, Katherine E Bemis2, James C Tyler3, Cushla J Metcalfe4, Patrick Laurenti5, Jean-Christophe Sandoz1, Sylvie Rétaux6 and Didier Casane*,1,7 1 Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, IRD, UMR Évolution, Génomes, Comportement et Écologie, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. 2 NOAA National Systematics Laboratory, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560, U.S.A. 3Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., 20560, U.S.A. 4 Independent Researcher, PO Box 21, Nambour QLD 4560, Australia. 5 Université de Paris, Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire des Energies de Demain, Paris, France 6 Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, 91190, Gif-sur- Yvette, France. 7 Université de Paris, UFR Sciences du Vivant, F-75013 Paris, France. * Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected]. !1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.09.434524; this version posted March 10, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Teleost fishes perceive their environment through a range of sensory modalities, among which olfaction often plays an important role.
[Show full text]
Fish Feeding and Dynamics of Soft-Sediment Mollusc Populations in a Coral Reef Lagoon
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published March 3 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. Fish feeding and dynamics of soft-sediment mollusc populations in a coral reef lagoon G. P. Jones*, D. J. Ferrelle*,P. F. Sale*** School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, N.S.W., Australia ABSTRACT: Large coral reef fish were experimentally excluded from enclosed plots for 2 yr to examine their effect on the dynamics of soft sediment mollusc populations from areas in One Tree lagoon (Great Barrier Reef). Three teleost fish which feed on benthic molluscs. Lethrinus nebulosus, Diagramrna pictum and Pseudocaranx dentex, were common in the vicinity of the cages. Surveys of feeding scars in the sand indicated similar use of cage control and open control plots and effective exclusion by cages. The densities of 10 common species of prey were variable between locations and among times. Only 2 species exhibited an effect attributable to feeding by fish, and this was at one location only. The effect size was small relative to the spatial and temporal variation in numbers. The power of the test was sufficient to detect effects of fish on most species, had they occurred. A number of the molluscs exhibited annual cycles in abundance, with summer peaks due to an influx of juveniles but almost total loss of this cohort in winter. There was no evidence that predation altered the size-structure of these populations. While predation by fish is clearly intense, it does not have significant effects on the demo- graphy of these molluscs. The results cast doubt on the generality of the claim that predation is an important structuring agent in tropical communities.
[Show full text]
Transposable Elements and Teleost Migratory Behaviour
International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Transposable Elements and Teleost Migratory Behaviour Elisa Carotti 1,†, Federica Carducci 1,†, Adriana Canapa 1, Marco Barucca 1,* , Samuele Greco 2 , Marco Gerdol 2 and Maria Assunta Biscotti 1 1 Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy; [email protected] (E.C.); [email protected] (F.C.); [email protected] (A.C.); [email protected] (M.A.B.) 2 Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Via L. Giorgieri, 5-34127 Trieste, Italy; [email protected] (S.G.); [email protected] (M.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † Equal contribution. Abstract: Transposable elements (TEs) represent a considerable fraction of eukaryotic genomes, thereby contributing to genome size, chromosomal rearrangements, and to the generation of new coding genes or regulatory elements. An increasing number of works have reported a link between the genomic abundance of TEs and the adaptation to specific environmental conditions. Diadromy represents a fascinating feature of fish, protagonists of migratory routes between marine and fresh- water for reproduction. In this work, we investigated the genomes of 24 fish species, including 15 teleosts with a migratory behaviour. The expected higher relative abundance of DNA transposons in ray-finned fish compared with the other fish groups was not confirmed by the analysis of the dataset considered. The relative contribution of different TE types in migratory ray-finned species did not show clear differences between oceanodromous and potamodromous fish. On the contrary, a remarkable relationship between migratory behaviour and the quantitative difference reported for short interspersed nuclear (retro)elements (SINEs) emerged from the comparison between anadro- mous and catadromous species, independently from their phylogenetic position.
[Show full text]
Reef-Associated Fishes Have More Maneuverable Body Shapes at a Macroevolutionary Scale
Coral Reefs https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-020-01976-w REPORT Reef-associated fishes have more maneuverable body shapes at a macroevolutionary scale 1 1 2 2 Olivier Larouche • Bailey Benton • Katherine A. Corn • Sarah T. Friedman • 1 1 1 2 Dominique Gross • Mikayla Iwan • Brian Kessler • Christopher M. Martinez • 1 1 2 1 Sierra Rodriguez • Hannah Whelpley • Peter C. Wainwright • Samantha A. Price Received: 25 March 2020 / Accepted: 9 July 2020 Ó Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract Marine habitats vary widely in structure, from with narrower and shallower caudal peduncles. Despite the incredibly complex coral reefs to simpler deep water and numerous evolutionary forces that may influence body open ocean habitats. Hydromechanical models of swim- shapes on a broad macroevolutionary scale, our results ming kinematics and microevolutionary studies suggest reveal differences in body shapes between reef-associated that these habitats select for different body shape charac- and non-reef species that are consistent with hydrome- teristics. Fishes living in simple habitats are predicted to chanical models of swimming kinematics as well as with experience selection for energy-efficient sustained swim- microevolutionary patterns. ming, which can be achieved by fusiform body shapes. In contrast, fishes living in complex habitats are predicted to Keywords Habitat structural complexity Á Fish body be under selection for maneuverability, which can be shapes Á Fish swimming Á Macroevolution Á Morphological enhanced by deep-bodied and laterally compressed forms. diversity To look for a signature of these processes at a broad macroevolutionary scale, we quantified the body shapes of 3322 species of marine teleostean fishes using a series of Introduction linear measurements.
[Show full text]
Rhodopsin Gene Evolution in Early Teleost Fishes
RESEARCH ARTICLE Rhodopsin gene evolution in early teleost fishes 1 2 1 Jhen-Nien Chen , Sarah Samadi , Wei-Jen ChenID * 1 Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, 2 Institute de SysteÂmatique, EÂ volution, BiodiversiteÂ (ISYEB), MuseÂum National d'Histoire Naturelle±CNRS, Sorbonne UniversiteÂ, EPHE, Paris, France * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 a1111111111 Rhodopsin mediates an essential step in image capture and is tightly associated with visual adaptations of aquatic organisms, especially species that live in dim light environments (e.g., the deep sea). The rh1 gene encoding rhodopsin was formerly considered a single- copy gene in genomes of vertebrates, but increasing exceptional cases have been found in teleost fish species. The main objective of this study was to determine to what extent the OPEN ACCESS visual adaptation of teleosts might have been shaped by the duplication and loss of rh1 Citation: Chen J-N, Samadi S, Chen W-J (2018) genes. For that purpose, homologous rh1/rh1-like sequences in genomes of ray-finned Rhodopsin gene evolution in early teleost fishes. PLoS ONE 13(11): e0206918. https://doi.org/ fishes from a wide taxonomic range were explored using a PCR-based method, data mining 10.1371/journal.pone.0206918 of public genetic/genomic databases, and subsequent phylogenomic analyses of the Editor: Michael Schubert, Laboratoire de Biologie retrieved sequences. We show that a second copy of the fish-specific intron-less rh1 is pres- du DeÂveloppement de Villefranche-sur-Mer, ent in the genomes of most anguillids (Elopomorpha), Hiodon alosoides (Osteoglossomor- FRANCE pha), and several clupeocephalan lineages.
[Show full text]
Ecomorphology of Feeding in Coral Reef Fishes
Ecomorphology of Feeding in Coral Reef Fishes Peter C. Wainwright David R. Bellwood Center for Population Biology Centre for Coral Reef Biodiversity University of California at Davis School of Marine Biology and Aquaculture Davis, California 95616 James Cook University Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia I. Introduction fish biology. We have attempted to identify generalities, II. How Does Morphology Influence Ecology? the major patterns that seem to cut across phylogenetic III. The Biomechanical Basis of Feeding Performance and geographic boundaries. We begin by constructing IV. Ecological Consequences of Functional a rationale for how functional morphology can be used Morphology to enhance our insight into some long-standing eco- V. Prospectus logical questions. We then review the fundamental me- chanical issues associated with feeding in fishes, and the basic design features of the head that are involved in prey capture and prey processing. This sets the stage I. Introduction for a discussion of how the mechanical properties of fish feeding systems have been modified during reef fish di- nce an observer gets past the stunning coloration, versification. With this background, we consider some O surely no feature inspires wonder in coral reef of the major conclusions that have been drawn from fishes so much as their morphological diversity. From studies of reef fish feeding ecomorphology. Because of large-mouthed groupers, to beaked parrotfish, barbeled space constraints we discuss only briefly the role of goatfish, long-snouted trumpet fish, snaggle-toothed sensory modalities--vision, olfaction, electroreception, tusk fish, tube-mouthed planktivores, and fat-lipped and hearingmbut these are also significant and diverse sweet lips, coral reef fishes display a dazzling array elements of the feeding arsenal of coral reef fishes and of feeding structures.
[Show full text]
Teleost Radiation Teleost Monophyly
Teleost Radiation Teleostean radiation - BIG ~ 20,000 species. Others put higher 30,000 (Stark 1987 Comparative Anatomy of Vertebrates) About 1/2 living vertebrates = teleosts Tetrapods dominant land vertebrates, teleosts dominate water. First = Triassic 240 my; Originally thought non-monophyletic = many independent lineages derived from "pholidophorid" ancestry. More-or-less established teleostean radiation is true monophyletic group Teleost Monophyly • Lauder and Liem support this notion: • 1. Mobile premaxilla - not mobile like maxilla halecostomes = hinged premaxilla modification enhancing suction generation. Provides basic structural development of truly mobile premaxilla, enabling jaw protrusion. Jaw protrusion evolved independently 3 times in teleostean radiation 1) Ostariophysi – Cypriniformes; 2) Atherinomorpha and 2) Percomorpha – especially certain derived percomorphs - cichlids and labroid allies PREMAXILLA 1 Teleost Monophyly • Lauder & Liem support notion: • 2. Unpaired basibranchial tooth plates (trend - consolidation dermal tooth patches in pharynx). • Primitive = whole bucco- pharynx w/ irregular tooth patches – consolidate into functional units - modified w/in teleostei esp. functional pharyngeal jaws. Teleost Monophyly • Lauder and Liem support this notion: • 3. Internal carotid foramen enclosed in parasphenoid (are all characters functional, maybe don't have one - why should they?) 2 Teleost Tails • Most interesting structure in teleosts is caudal fin. • Teleosts possess caudal skeleton differs from other neopterygian fishes - Possible major functional significance in Actinopterygian locomotor patterns. • Halecomorphs-ginglymodes = caudal fin rays articulate with posterior edge of haemal spines and hypurals (modified haemal spines). Fin is heterocercal (inside and out). Ginglymod - Gars Halecomorph - Amia 3 Tails • “Chondrostean hinge” at base of upper lobe - weakness btw body and tail lobe. Asymmetrical tail = asymmetrical thrust with respect to body axis.
[Show full text]
Body-Shape Diversity in Triassic–Early Cretaceous Neopterygian ﬁshes: Sustained Holostean Disparity and Predominantly Gradual Increases in Teleost Phenotypic Variety
Body-shape diversity in Triassic–Early Cretaceous neopterygian ﬁshes: sustained holostean disparity and predominantly gradual increases in teleost phenotypic variety John T. Clarke and Matt Friedman Comprising Holostei and Teleostei, the ~32,000 species of neopterygian fishes are anatomically disparate and represent the dominant group of aquatic vertebrates today. However, the pattern by which teleosts rose to represent almost all of this diversity, while their holostean sister-group dwindled to eight extant species and two broad morphologies, is poorly constrained. A geometric morphometric approach was taken to generate a morphospace from more than 400 fossil taxa, representing almost all articulated neopterygian taxa known from the first 150 million years— roughly 60%—of their history (Triassic‒Early Cretaceous). Patterns of morphospace occupancy and disparity are examined to: (1) assess evidence for a phenotypically “dominant” holostean phase; (2) evaluate whether expansions in teleost phenotypic variety are predominantly abrupt or gradual, including assessment of whether early apomorphy-defined teleosts are as morphologically conservative as typically assumed; and (3) compare diversification in crown and stem teleosts. The systematic affinities of dapediiforms and pycnodontiforms, two extinct neopterygian clades of uncertain phylogenetic placement, significantly impact patterns of morphological diversification. For instance, alternative placements dictate whether or not holosteans possessed statistically higher disparity than teleosts in the Late Triassic and Jurassic. Despite this ambiguity, all scenarios agree that holosteans do not exhibit a decline in disparity during the Early Triassic‒Early Cretaceous interval, but instead maintain their Toarcian‒Callovian variety until the end of the Early Cretaceous without substantial further expansions. After a conservative Induan‒Carnian phase, teleosts colonize (and persistently occupy) novel regions of morphospace in a predominantly gradual manner until the Hauterivian, after which expansions are rare.
[Show full text]
Evolutionary History of Teleost Intron-Containing and Intron-Less
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Evolutionary history of teleost intron-containing and intron-less rhodopsin genes Received: 15 February 2019 Chihiro Fujiyabu1, Keita Sato 2, Ni Made Laksmi Utari2,3, Hideyo Ohuchi2, Accepted: 9 July 2019 Yoshinori Shichida1,4,5 & Takahiro Yamashita1,5 Published: xx xx xxxx Recent progress in whole genome sequencing has revealed that animals have various kinds of opsin genes for photoreception. Among them, most opsin genes have introns in their coding regions. However, it has been known for a long time that teleost retinas express intron-less rhodopsin genes, which are presumed to have been formed by retroduplication from an ancestral intron-containing rhodopsin gene. In addition, teleosts have an intron-containing rhodopsin gene (exo-rhodopsin) exclusively for pineal photoreception. In this study, to unravel the evolutionary origin of the two teleost rhodopsin genes, we analyzed the rhodopsin genes of non-teleost fshes in the Actinopterygii. The phylogenetic analysis of full-length sequences of bichir, sturgeon and gar rhodopsins revealed that retroduplication of the rhodopsin gene occurred after branching of the bichir lineage. In addition, analysis of the tissue distribution and the molecular properties of bichir, sturgeon and gar rhodopsins showed that the abundant and exclusive expression of intron-containing rhodopsin in the pineal gland and the short lifetime of its meta II intermediate, which leads to optimization for pineal photoreception, were achieved after branching of the gar lineage. Based on these results, we propose a stepwise evolutionary model of teleost intron-containing and intron-less rhodopsin genes. Opsins are photoreceptive molecules that universally underlie the molecular basis of visual and non-visual pho- toreception in animals1–3.
[Show full text]
The Exceptional Diversity of Visual Adaptations in Deep-Sea Teleost Fishes
Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/semcdb Review The exceptional diversity of visual adaptations in deep-sea teleost fishes Fanny de Busserolles*, Lily Fogg, Fabio Cortesi, Justin Marshall Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The deep-sea is the largest and one of the dimmest habitats on earth. In this extreme environment, every photon Deep-sea teleost counts and may make the difference between life and death for its inhabitants. Two sources of light are present Dim-light vision in the deep-sea; downwelling light, that becomes dimmer and spectrally narrower with increasing depth until Ocular adaptation completely disappearing at around 1000 m, and bioluminescence, the light emitted by animals themselves. Retina Despite these relatively dark and inhospitable conditions, many teleost fish have made the deep-sea their home, Opsin relying heavily on vision to survive. Their visual systems have had to adapt, sometimes in astonishing and Bioluminescence bizarre ways. This review examines some aspects of the visual system of deep-sea teleosts and highlights the exceptional diversity in both optical and retinal specialisations. We also reveal how widespread several of these adaptations are across the deep-sea teleost phylogeny. Finally, the significance of some recent findings as well as the surprising diversity in visual adaptations is discussed. 1. Introduction or mate detection, to communicate, camouflage, or for navigation, in- cluding to stay within a particular depth range [4,5].
[Show full text]
Frontiers in Zoology Biomed Central
Frontiers in Zoology BioMed Central Research Open Access A novel and ancient group of type I keratins with members in bichir, sturgeon and gar Michael Schaffeld*1, Mark Haberkamp1, Sonja Schätzlein2, Sebastian Neumann1 and Christian Hunzinger3 Address: 1Institute of Zoology, Johannes-von-Müller-Weg 6, Johannes Gutenberg University, D-55099 Mainz, Germany, 2Dept. of Gastroenterology, Medical School Hannover, Carl Neuberg Str. 1, K11, E01, R1400, 30629 Hannover, Germany and 3Merck KGaA, Central Services Analytics, Central Product Analytics/Bioanalytics, Frankfurter Str. 250, D-64293 Darmstadt, Germany Email: Michael Schaffeld* - [email protected]; Mark Haberkamp - [email protected]; Sonja Schätzlein - schaetzlein.sonja@mh- hannover.de; Sebastian Neumann - [email protected]; Christian Hunzinger - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 6 June 2007 Received: 22 December 2006 Accepted: 6 June 2007 Frontiers in Zoology 2007, 4:16 doi:10.1186/1742-9994-4-16 This article is available from: http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/4/1/16 © 2007 Schaffeld et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract 1. Background: Vertebrate epithelial cells typically express a specific set of keratins. In teleosts, keratins are also present in a variety of mesenchymal cells, which usually express vimentin. Significantly, our previous studies revealed that virtually all known teleost keratins evolved independently from those present in terrestrial vertebrates. To further elucidate the evolutionary scenario that led to the large variety of keratins and their complex expression patterns in present day teleosts, we have investigated their presence in bichir, sturgeon and gar.
[Show full text]
Teleost Fishes (The Teleostei)
OEB 130: BIOLOGY OF FISHES Lecture 4: Overview of ray-finned fish diversity (Actinopterygii) Announcements 1 1. Please review the syllabus for reading and lab information! 2. Please do the readings: for this week posted now. 3. Lab sections: 4. i) Dylan Wainwright, Thursday 2 - 4/5 pm ii) Kelsey Lucas, Friday 2 - 4/5 pm iii) Labs are in the Northwest Building basement (room B141) Please be on time at 2pm! 4. Lab sections done: first lab this week tomorrow! 5. First lab reading: Agassiz fish story; lab will be a bit shorter 6. Office hours to come Announcements 2 8 pages of general information on fish external anatomy and characters to help you learn some basic external fish anatomy and terminology – the last slides in the uploaded lecture Powerpoint file for today. Please look at these before lab this week, but no need to bring them in with you. Scanned from: Hastings, P. A., Walker, H. J. and Galland, G. R. (2014). Fishes: A guide to their diversity: Univ. of California Press. Next Monday: prepare to draw/diagram in lecture (colored pencils/pens will be useful) Lecture outline Lecture outline: 1. Brief review of the phylogeny and key traits so far 2. Actinopterygian clade: overview and introduction to key groups and selected key traits 3. Special focus on: 1. Fin ray structure and function 2. Lung and swimblader evolution 3. Early diversity of teleost fishes Selected key shared derived characters (synapomorphies) Review from last lecture Chondrichthyes (sharks and rays and ratfishes): 1. Dentition: multiple rows of unattached teeth 2.
[Show full text]