<<

Feeding Strategies in BIOE 127 Summer 2015

Vikram B. Baliga Ecology & Evolutionary Biology UC Santa Cruz

Environment

Characteristic Air Water Density 1.21 kg m-3 1.024 x 103 kg m-3 Dynamic Viscosity 18.08 x 10 -6 Pa*s 1.07 x 10 -3 Pa*s

O2-Carrying Capacity 95% less than air Thermal Conductivity 23 x air Human Skull Skull

44 bony elements at birth # of varies widely among 22 bones as an adult Typically 30 to 60 bones Very little kinesis Highly kinetic Aquatic prey capture

suction

ram

manipulation (biting)

Liem, 1980 Steven Day Tim Higham

Roi Holzmann Kristen Bishop Lepomis macrochirus

DPIV Experiments DPIV: Flow Velocity Hydrodynamics of Suction Feeding (Day et al. 2005)

I. Flow = symmetrical

II. Velocity decreases drastically away from the mouth

III. Fluid speed is only significant within 1 mouth diameter How Polypterus Conserved?

Morphological Diversity

Seahorses Mastacembalus Anguilla Cichlids Three Major Feeding Categories in the Aquatic Environment

1) Inertial suction

Not 2) Ram Feeding Mutually Exclusive

3) Manipulation Feeding Mechanisms

Body Ram

Suction

Jaw Ram Ram Necessitates Jaw Protrusion Jaw Protrusion Extremes Why might jaw protrusion have evolved? 1. Sneak up on your prey

2. Increase forces exerted on your prey Research on Jaw Protrusion

• Accelerates the water around the prey

• Increase by up to 35% the total force exerted on attached, escaping and free-floating passive prey

• the strike. Feeding Mechanisms

Body Pure Ram Ram

Suction

Jaw Ram Pure Ram Strategy Feeding Mechanisms

Body Pure Ram Ram

Suction

Jaw Ram Biting Extending the Strike Ram Biters Biting Diversity Model Jaw Closing

3rd lever

0 1

Speed Force MA jaw –closing

Needlefish 0.04 (Strongylura incisa)

Gar 0.051 (Lepisosteus osseus) 0.27 (Sphyraena barracuda) Queen trigger 0.43 (Balistes vetula) Summary Functional Roles of Suction

1. Respiration

2. Prey Capture

3. Prey Transport Filaments 4,5 Prey Transport

Mouth -> -> -> Branchial Arches -> oesophagus Sciaenops ocellatus -Red Drum

Grubich and Westneat. 2006. Journal of Anatomy 1: 79-92 Pharyngeal Musculature Epibranchial

Pharyngobranchial

ceratobranchial Pharyngeal Diversity

(a) Papilliform –plant shredding (b) Molariform- crushing snails Snakes

Mehta & Burghardt, 2008; Mehta 2009

Cundall &Greene, 2000 Elongate Limb-reduced Forms Teleost Phylogeny Anguilliforms Morays

• ~ 200 species • Complete limb loss • Coral reefs

Snakes Morays

• Elongate & limbless • Can attain large sizes • Obligate predators/ Consume large prey whole • Affect local prey densities How do morays consume large prey whole in the aquatic environment?

Moray Skull

What consequences do these features have on feeding behavior? Can morays generate suction? Pressure Data

• Muraena retifera • Micropterus salmoides kPa = -1 kPa = -8

Mehta, unpubl data. Biters use suction to transport prey Inertial Feeding

Pharyngeal

Halichoeres bivittatus Morphological & Functional Innovation Prey Transport Behavior Thank you

UCLA HARVARD LABORATORIES Feeding Mechanisms

Body Pure Ram Ram

Suction

Jaw Ram Biting