DOCSLIB.ORG

Unitarity Bounds and the Cuspy Halo Problem

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unitarity Bounds and the Cuspy Halo Problem View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server Unitarity Bounds and the Cuspy Halo Problem Lam Hui Department of Physics, Columbia University, 538 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027 Institute for Advanced Study, School of Natural Sciences, Princeton, NJ 08540 [email protected] Conventional Cold Dark Matter cosmological models predict small scale structures, such as cuspy halos, which are in apparent conflict with observations. Several alternative scenarios based on modifying fundamental properties of the dark matter have been proposed. We show that general principles of quantum mechanics, in particular unitarity, imply interesting constraints on two pro- posals: collisional dark matter proposed by Spergel & Steinhardt, and strongly annihilating dark matter proposed by Kaplinghat, Knox & Turner. Efficient scattering required in both implies m <∼ 12 GeV and m <∼ 25 GeV respectively. The same arguments show that the strong annihilation in the second scenario implies the presence of significant elastic scattering, particularly for large enough masses. Recently, a variant of the collisional scenario has been advocated to satisfy simultaneously constraints from dwarf galaxies to clusters, with a cross section that scales inversely with velocity. We show that this scenario likely involves super-elastic processes, and the associated kinetic energy change must be taken into account when making predictions. Implications for experimental searches are discussed. 98.89.Cq; 98.80.Es; 98.62.Gq; 11.80.Et; 11.55Bq I. INTRODUCTION Griest and Kamionkowski [9] previously derived similar mass bounds related to the freeze-out density of thermal There is a long history of efforts to constrain dark mat- relics, assuming 2-body final states. In xII, we provide ter properties from galactic structure (e.g. [1]). Recent a general derivation for arbitrary final states using the numerical simulations [2] sharpen the predictions of Cold classic optical theorem [10]. We summarize our findings Dark Matter (CDM) structure formation models, and in xIII, discuss exceptions to our bounds, and other so- apparent discrepancies with the observed properties of lutions to the cuspy halo problem. structures from galactic to cluster scales are uncovered. The main one that has attracted a lot of attention is the II. DERIVING THE UNITARITY BOUNDS cuspy halo problem , namely that CDM models predict halos that have a high density core or have an inner pro- file that is too steep compared to observations ( [3], but Different versions of the unitarity bounds can be see also [4]). This has encouraged several proposals that found in many textbooks, and can be most easily un- dark matter might have properties different from those derstood using non-relativistic quantum mechanics (e.g. of conventional CDM (see [5] and summary therein). [11]), which is probably adequate for our purpose. How- On the other hand, general principles of quantum me- ever, the results and derivation given here might be of chanics impose non-trivial constraints on some of these wider interest e.g. for estimating thermal relic density. models. We focus here on the proposals of collisional Here we follow closely the field theory treatment of [12]. or strongly self-interacting dark matter (SIDM) by [6] The optical theorem [10] is a powerful consequence of y and of strongly annihilating dark matter (SADM) by [7]. the unitarity of the scattering matrix S, i.e. S S = 1, y y Both require high level of interaction by particle physics which implies (1 − S) (1 − S) = (1 − S ) + (1 − S), or standard: an elastic scattering cross-section of σel: ∼ −24 2 y 10 (mX = GeV) cm for the former and an annihilation dγhβj1 − Sjγihγj1 − S jαi = 2 Re hβj1 − Sjαi (1) −28 2 Z cross-section of σann:vrel ∼ 10 (mX = GeV) cm for the latter, where mX is the particle mass, and vrel is the rel- where α and β represent two specified states and γ rep- ative velocity of approach. The proposed dark matter resents a complete set of states with measure dγ. Using is therefore quite different from usual candidates such as the definition of the scattering amplitude Aβα the axion or neutralino. We show that the unitarity of 4 4 the scattering matrix, together with a few reasonable as- hβj1 − Sjαi ≡ −i(2π) δ (pβ − pα)Aβα (2) sumptions, imposes interesting particle mass bounds as well as other physical constraints. This is done while where pβ and pα are the total four-momenta, one obtains making minimal assumptions about the nature of the 4 4 2 interactions. Our results complement constraints from dγ(2π) δ (pα − pγ)jAγαj = 2 Im Aαα (3) experiments or astrophysical considerations e.g. [8]. Z 1 if β = α in eq. (1). We are interested in the case where α This gives the total spin-averaged cross-section for scat- represents a 2-body state of X + X or X + X¯ approach- tering from X + X or X + X¯ to all possible final states. ing each other. The final state γ, on the other hand, For X +X¯ annihilation, we exclude from the above the is completely general, and the integration over γ covers contribution due to elastic scattering (where type and the entire spectrum of possible final states. To be more mass of particles do not change i.e. X + X¯ ! X + X¯, z z z z 0 precise, suppose jαi = jk1; s1; k2; s2; ni where s1 and s2 implying jk1j = jk1j) [9]. To do so, we need the following represent the spin-states of the two incoming particles expression for 2-body to 2-body scattering cross-section: with spins s1 and s2 (in our particular case, s1 = s2) dσ jA j2 while k1 and k2 are their respective 4-momenta, and n βα 4 4 dβ = k (2π) δ (pβ − pα)dβ ; (7) labels the particle types (e.g. mass, etc.). Recalling that dβ 4(E1 + E2)j 1j 2 dσ/dγ / jAγαj , eq. (3) gives in the center of mass frame We average over initial spin states and integrate over out- k k (adopted hereafter i.e. 1 + 2 = 0): going momenta, but focus on the elastic contribution (n0 0 0 0 0 0 dσ Im A in jβi = jk1; s1; k2; s2; n i is set to n in jαi) [12]: dγ (α ! γ) = αα (4) Z dγ 2(E1 + E2)jk1j π σel: = 2 (2j + 1) (8) jk1j (2s1 + 1)(2s2 + 1) where the left hand side is exactly the total cross-section. Xj This is the optical theorem. It states that the total cross- 0 0 2 jh` s nj1 − Sj`sni tot: j section for scattering from a two-body initial state to all j;E `;s;`X0;s0 possible final states equals the imaginary part of the two- body to two-body forward scattering amplitude. The above is the total cross-section for elastic scattering To use this theorem, we expand the scattering am- (note: the same expression also describes X+X ! X+X plitude in terms of partial waves i.e. states labeled as elastic scattering) that has to be subtracted from σtot: to z jktot:; Etot:; j; j ; `; s; ni where ktot: is the total linear mo- yield the total inelastic scattering cross-section, which is mentum (= 0 in the center of mass frame), Etot: is the relevant for annihilation into all possible final states: total energy , j is the total angular momentum, jz is its π z-component, ` is the orbital momentum and s is the to- σinel: = 2 (2j + 1) (9) k1(2s1 + 1)(2s2 + 1) tal spin. Inserting appropriate complete sets of partial Xj wave outer products into eq. (2), we obtain [1 − jh`snjSj`snij2 − jh`0s0nj1 − Sj`snij2] 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 X`;s ` 6=X`;s 6=s Aβα= 4i(2π) [E1 + E2=jk1j] [E1 + E2=jk1j] (5) 0 0 0 h` s n j1 − Sj`snij;Etot: From eq. (6) & (9), we can derive two bounds: Xj;jz `0;sX0;`;s 2 −1 tot k1 1 2 0 z0 z0 z0 z z0 z0 ^0 0 z0 σ : ≤ 4π[j j (2s + 1)(2s + 1)] 2j + 1 (10) 0 0 0 0 k1 hs s js1 s2 is1;s2 hjj j` s i` ;s h j` ` i Xj X`;s `zX0;sz 0 2 −1 σinel ≤ π[jk1j (2s1 + 1)(2s2 + 1)] 2j + 1 (11) z z z ∗ z z z ∗ ^ z ∗ : k1 hss js1s2is1;s2 hjj j` s i`;sh j`` i Xj X`;s `Xz;sz The first inequality uses jh`snjSj`snij2 ≤ 1, ob- where the crucial assumption is that S is rotationally tained from dγh`snjSyjγihγjSj`sni ≥ jh`snjSj`snij2 invariant and so j and jz are conserved, in addition to y 0 0 0 and S S = 1.R A similar bound can be derived for σel: energy conserving. The notation h` s n j1 − Sj`snij;Etot: z z as well, which coincides exactly with that for σtot:. emphasizes that S is diagonal in j, j and Etot but the j We pause to note that the above bounds assume only dependence drops out because S commutes with Jx iJy. z z z z z z unitarity and the conservation of total energy and lin- The inner products hss js1s2is1;s2 and hjj j` s i`;s give ^ z ^ ear and angular momentum. No assumptions are made the Clebsch-Gordon coefficients, and hk1j`` i = Y``z (k1) ^ about the nature of the particles, whether they are com- is the spherical harmonic function. We assume k1 = ^z ^ posite or point-like. Nor do we assume the number of in which case Y``z (k1) = δ`z;0 2` + 1=(4π).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Unifying Theory of Dark Energy and Dark Matter: Negative Masses and Matter Creation Within a Modified ΛCDM Framework J
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. theory_dark_universe_arxiv c ESO 2018 November 5, 2018 A unifying theory of dark energy and dark matter: Negative masses and matter creation within a modified ΛCDM framework J. S. Farnes1; 2 1 Oxford e-Research Centre (OeRC), Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QG, UK. e-mail: [email protected]? 2 Department of Astrophysics/IMAPP, Radboud University, PO Box 9010, NL-6500 GL Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Received February 23, 2018 ABSTRACT Dark energy and dark matter constitute 95% of the observable Universe. Yet the physical nature of these two phenomena remains a mystery. Einstein suggested a long-forgotten solution: gravitationally repulsive negative masses, which drive cosmic expansion and cannot coalesce into light-emitting structures. However, contemporary cosmological results are derived upon the reasonable assumption that the Universe only contains positive masses. By reconsidering this assumption, I have constructed a toy model which suggests that both dark phenomena can be unified into a single negative mass fluid. The model is a modified ΛCDM cosmology, and indicates that continuously-created negative masses can resemble the cosmological constant and can flatten the rotation curves of galaxies. The model leads to a cyclic universe with a time-variable Hubble parameter, potentially providing compatibility with the current tension that is emerging in cosmological measurements. In the first three-dimensional N-body simulations of negative mass matter in the scientific literature, this exotic material naturally forms haloes around galaxies that extend to several galactic radii. These haloes are not cuspy. The proposed cosmological model is therefore able to predict the observed distribution of dark matter in galaxies from first principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Interacting Inelastic Dark Matter: a Viable Solution to the Small Scale Structure Problems
    Prepared for submission to JCAP ADP-16-48/T1004 Self-interacting inelastic dark matter: A viable solution to the small scale structure problems Mattias Blennow,a Stefan Clementz,a Juan Herrero-Garciaa; b aDepartment of physics, School of Engineering Sciences, KTH Royal Institute of Tech- nology, AlbaNova University Center, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden bARC Center of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale (CoEPP), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia Abstract. Self-interacting dark matter has been proposed as a solution to the small- scale structure problems, such as the observed flat cores in dwarf and low surface brightness galaxies. If scattering takes place through light mediators, the scattering cross section relevant to solve these problems may fall into the non-perturbative regime leading to a non-trivial velocity dependence, which allows compatibility with limits stemming from cluster-size objects. However, these models are strongly constrained by different observations, in particular from the requirements that the decay of the light mediator is sufficiently rapid (before Big Bang Nucleosynthesis) and from direct detection. A natural solution to reconcile both requirements are inelastic endothermic interactions, such that scatterings in direct detection experiments are suppressed or even kinematically forbidden if the mass splitting between the two-states is sufficiently large. Using an exact solution when numerically solving the Schr¨odingerequation, we study such scenarios and find regions in the parameter space of dark matter and mediator masses, and the mass splitting of the states, where the small scale structure problems can be solved, the dark matter has the correct relic abundance and direct detection limits can be evaded.
    [Show full text]
  • Probing the Nature of Dark Matter in the Universe
    PROBING THE NATURE OF DARK MATTER IN THE UNIVERSE A Thesis Submitted For The Degree Of Doctor Of Philosophy In The Faculty Of Science by Abir Sarkar Under the supervision of Prof. Shiv K Sethi Raman Research Institute Joint Astronomy Programme (JAP) Department of Physics Indian Institute of Science BANGALORE - 560012 JULY, 2017 c Abir Sarkar JULY 2017 All rights reserved Declaration I, Abir Sarkar, hereby declare that the work presented in this doctoral thesis titled `Probing The Nature of Dark Matter in the Universe', is entirely original. This work has been carried out by me under the supervision of Prof. Shiv K Sethi at the Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Raman Research Institute under the Joint Astronomy Programme (JAP) of the Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science. I further declare that this has not formed the basis for the award of any degree, diploma, membership, associateship or similar title of any university or institution. Department of Physics Abir Sarkar Indian Institute of Science Date : Bangalore, 560012 INDIA TO My family, without whose support this work could not be done Acknowledgements First and foremost I would like to thank my supervisor Prof. Shiv K Sethi in Raman Research Institute(RRI). He has always spent substantial time whenever I have needed for any academic discussions. I am thankful for his inspirations and ideas to make my Ph.D. experience produc- tive and stimulating. I am also grateful to our collaborator Prof. Subinoy Das of Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore, India. I am thankful to him for his insightful comments not only for our publica- tions but also for the thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuzzy and Axion-Like Dark Matter As an Illusion
    Copyright © 2019 by Sylwester Kornowski All rights reserved Fuzzy and Axion-Like Dark Matter as an Illusion Sylwester Kornowski Abstract: Here we show that masses of the dark-matter (DM) loops in the massive spiral galaxies have the same values as masses of the postulated fuzzy and axion-like DM particles. The DM loops are not fuzzy and, contrary to the spin-zero axion-like DM particles, spin of them is quantized. The DM loops in galactic halos interact with stars via the weak interactions of the virtual electron-positron pairs created spontaneously in spacetime. Such interactions decrease radii of the DM loops and simultaneously increase the orbital speeds of stars. We calculated also the small-scale cutoff for such loop-like DM. 1. Introduction The existence of dark matter (DM) results from its gravitational interaction on various astronomical scales. But the cold dark matter (CDM) models predict cuspy dark matter halo profiles (not seen in the rotation curves of galaxies) and an abundance of low mass halos (not seen in local population of dwarf galaxies). To avoid such problems it is postulated to have warm dark matter (mwarm ~ keV) but this in turn disturbs the structure on larger scales. The solution is a free very light scalar particle (m ~ 10–21 eV = 1.8·10–57 kg). Such ultra-light scalar particles cause that the dark matter behaves as a classical field and the wave nature of the particle is manifest on astrophysical scales. It is assumed that dark matter halos are stable on small scales because of the uncertainty principle in wave mechanics.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Dark Matter Halo for Every Elementary Particle' Model
    A critical review of MOND from the perspective of the `Dark Matter Halo for Every Elementary Particle' Model E.P.J. de Haas (Paul) Nijmegen, The Netherlands∗ (Dated: September 24, 2015) Abstract In this paper I look at MOND from the perspective of my elementary particle Dark matter halo hypothesis. First I repeat the core elements of my model, in order for the paper to be self contained. Then I show how the energy equation for the rotation curve with an extra constant term can give the natural but deceptive impression that Newton's Laws have to be corrected for the ultra low regime, if this energy perspective is missing. Special attention is given to the virtual aspect of the acceleration, virtual as in not caused by Newton's force of gravity, due to a constant kinetic energy caused by the Dark Matter halo at large distances. The rotation curve equations are discussed and the one from my model is given. Conclusions are drawn from the ΛCDM core-cusp problem in relation to this new perspective on MOND as hiding a Dark Matter model perspective. My model might well be the bridge between MOND at the galactic scale and ΛCDM at the cosmic level. ∗ haas2u[at]gmail.com 1 I. THE ELEMENTARY PARTICLE DARK MATTER HALO MODEL It is common knowledge that a Dark Matter mass function linear in r can explain the flatness of galaxy rotation curves at large r. This is the empirical starting point of our Dark Matter model, first presented in [1] and in [2]. Given a rest mass m0 at r = 0, it will have an additional spherical Dark Matter halo containing an extra mass, with Dark Matter properties only, in the sphere with radius r as r mdm = m0: (1) rdm The Dark Matter radius rdm should have a galaxy specific value somewhere in between 10 kpc and 20 kpc, so approximately once or twice the radius of an average luminous galaxy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Unifying Theory of Dark Energy and Dark Matter: Negative Masses and Matter Creation Within a Modified ΛCDM Framework?,?? J
    A&A 620, A92 (2018) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832898 & c ESO 2018 Astrophysics A unifying theory of dark energy and dark matter: Negative masses and matter creation within a modified ΛCDM framework?,?? J. S. Farnes1,2 1 Oxford e-Research Centre (OeRC), Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QG, UK e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Astrophysics/IMAPP, Radboud University, PO Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands Received 22 February 2018 / Accepted 20 October 2018 ABSTRACT Dark energy and dark matter constitute 95% of the observable Universe. Yet the physical nature of these two phenomena remains a mystery. Einstein suggested a long-forgotten solution: gravitationally repulsive negative masses, which drive cosmic expansion and cannot coalesce into light-emitting structures. However, contemporary cosmological results are derived upon the reasonable assumption that the Universe only contains positive masses. By reconsidering this assumption, I have constructed a toy model which suggests that both dark phenomena can be unified into a single negative mass fluid. The model is a modified ΛCDM cosmology, and indicates that continuously-created negative masses can resemble the cosmological constant and can flatten the rotation curves of galaxies. The model leads to a cyclic universe with a time-variable Hubble parameter, potentially providing compatibility with the current tension that is emerging in cosmological measurements. In the first three-dimensional N-body simulations of negative mass matter in the scientific literature, this exotic material naturally forms haloes around galaxies that extend to several galactic radii. These haloes are not cuspy.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Galactic Star Formation in Galaxy Clusters and Post-Starburst Galaxies
    Evolution of galactic star formation in galaxy clusters and post-starburst galaxies Marcel Lotz M¨unchen2020 Evolution of galactic star formation in galaxy clusters and post-starburst galaxies Marcel Lotz Dissertation an der Fakult¨atf¨urPhysik der Ludwig{Maximilians{Universit¨at M¨unchen vorgelegt von Marcel Lotz aus Frankfurt am Main M¨unchen, den 16. November 2020 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Andreas Burkert Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Til Birnstiel Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung:8. Januar 2021 Contents Zusammenfassung viii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 A brief history of astronomy . .1 1.2 Cosmology . .5 1.2.1 The Cosmological Principle and our expanding Universe . .6 1.2.2 Dark matter, dark energy and the ΛCDM cosmological model . .9 1.2.3 Chronology of the Universe . 13 1.3 Galaxy properties . 16 1.3.1 Morphology . 17 1.3.2 Colour . 20 1.4 Galaxy evolution . 22 1.4.1 Galaxy formation . 22 1.4.2 Star formation and feedback . 24 1.4.3 Mergers . 25 1.4.4 Galaxy clusters and environmental quenching . 26 1.4.5 Post-starburst galaxies . 29 2 State-of-the-art simulations 33 2.1 Brief introduction to numerical simulations . 33 2.1.1 Treatment of the gravitational force . 34 2.1.2 Varying hydrodynamic approaches . 35 2.2 Magneticum Pathfinder simulations . 39 2.2.1 Smoothed particle hydrodynamics . 39 2.2.2 Details of the Magneticum Pathfinder simulations . 40 3 Gone after one orbit: How cluster environments quench galaxies 45 3.1 Data sample . 46 3.1.1 Observational comparison with CLASH . 46 3.2 Velocity-anisotropy Profiles .
    [Show full text]
  • Descriptions of Elementary Particles Plus Dark Matter Plus Dark Energy and Explanations for Some Related Data
    Descriptions of Elementary Particles plus Dark Matter plus Dark Energy and Explanations for Some Related Data Thomas J. Buckholtz T. J. Buckholtz & Associates [email protected] June 12, 2019 Copyright c 2019 Thomas J. Buckholtz , Keywords: beyond the Standard Model, dark matter, galaxy evolution, dark energy, cosmology, quantum gravity, quantum eld theory Abstract We suggest united models and specic predictions regarding elementary particles, dark matter, aspects of galaxy evolution, dark energy, and aspects of the cosmology timeline. Results include specic predictions for new ele- mentary particles and specic descriptions of dark matter and dark energy. Some of our modeling matches known elementary particles and extrapolates to predict other elementary particles, including bases for dark matter. Some modeling explains observed ratios of eects of dark matter to eects of ordinary matter. Some models suggest aspects of galaxy formation and evolution. Some modeling correlates with eras of increases or decreases in the observed rate of expansion of the universe. Our modeling framework features mathematics for isotropic quantum harmonic oscillators and provides a framework for creating physics theories. Some aspects of our approach em- phasize existence of elementary particles and de-emphasize motion. Some of our models complement traditional quantum eld theory and, for example, traditional calculations of anomalous magnetic dipole moments. Contents 1 Introduction . 2 1.1 Context for and scope of our work . 2 1.2 Timing regarding assumptions put into the work and explanations coming from the work 2 1.3 Scope of this manuscript . 3 2 Methods.............................................. 3 2.1 Approach . 3 2.2 Inspirations . 5 2.3 ALG double-entry bookkeeping .
    [Show full text]
  • Decaying Superheavy Dark Matter and Subgalactic Structure of the Universe
    Physics Letters B 594 (2004) 1–7 www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Decaying superheavy dark matter and subgalactic structure of the Universe Chung-Hsien Chou, Kin-Wang Ng Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei 11529, Taiwan, ROC Received 11 December 2003; received in revised form 20 April 2004; accepted 29 April 2004 Available online 9 June 2004 Editor: J. Frieman Abstract The collisionless cold dark matter (CCDM) model predicts overly dense cores in dark matter halos and overly abundant subhalos. We show that the idea that CDM are decaying superheavy particles which produce ultra-high energy cosmic rays with energies beyond the Greisen–Zatsepin–Kuzmin cutoff may simultaneously solve the problem of subgalactic structure formation in CCDM model. In particular, the Kuzmin–Rubakov’s decaying superheavy CDM model may give an explanation to the smallness of the cosmological constant and a new thought to the CDM experimental search. 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. PACS: 95.35.+d; 98.62.Gq; 98.70.Sa; 98.80.Cq 1. Introduction teracting particles. However, there exist serious dis- crepancies between observations and numerical simu- Recent cosmological observations such as dynam- lations of CDM halos in collisionless cold dark matter ical mass, Type Ia supernovae, gravitational lensing, (CCDM) models [3–5], which predict too much power and cosmic microwave background anisotropies, con- on small scales, manifested as cuspy CDM cores in cordantly predict a spatially flat universe containing a dwarf galaxies [6], galaxies like the Milky Way [7], mixture of 5% baryons, 25% cold dark matter (CDM), and central regions of galaxy clusters [8] as well as and 70% vacuum-like dark energy [1,2],termedasthe a large excess of CDM subhalos or dwarf galaxies standard CDM model.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepton Flavour Violation and Dark Matter Phenomenology
    UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA´ DE MADRID FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE F´ISICA TEORICA´ Lepton Flavour Violation and Dark Matter Phenomenology Memoria de Tesis Doctoral realizada por Bryan Zald´ıvar Montero presentada ante el Departamento de F´ısica Teorica´ de la Universidad Autonoma´ de Madrid para la obtencion´ del T´ıtulo de Doctor en Ciencias. Tesis Doctoral dirigida por Alberto Casas Jesus´ Moreno del I.F.T. de la Universidad Autonoma´ de Madrid Madrid, Febrero 2013. AGRADECIMIENTOS CONTENTS 1 General Introduction and Motivations 1 2 Supersymmetry and Lepton Flavour Violation 5 2.1 Elements of SUSY .............................. 5 2.1.1 Neutrino masses and mixings .................... 9 2.1.2 Supersymmetric See-saw ....................... 9 2.1.3 LFV processes in the supersymmetric See-saw ........... 11 2.2 Leptogenesis ................................. 14 3 Dark Matter phenomenology 17 3.1 Experimental evidences of Dark Matter ................... 17 3.2 Dark Matter candidates ............................ 18 3.2.1 Baryonic Dark Matter? ........................ 18 3.2.2 Non-baryonic Dark Matter ...................... 19 3.3 Early universe ................................. 20 3.3.1 The dynamics of the universe’s evolution .............. 20 3.3.2 Thermodynamics ........................... 23 3.4 Dark Matter abundance ............................ 29 3.4.1 Freeze-out of cold Dark Matter .................... 31 3.5 Dark Matter Detection ............................ 33 3.5.1 Indirect detection ........................... 33 3.5.2 Direct
    [Show full text]
  • Unitarity Bounds and the Cuspy Halo Problem
    Unitarity Bounds and the Cuspy Halo Problem Lam Hui Department of Physics, Columbia University, 538 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027 Institute for Advanced Study, School of Natural Sciences, Princeton, NJ 08540 [email protected] Conventional Cold Dark Matter cosmological models predict small scale structures, such as cuspy halos, which are in apparent conflict with observations. Several alternative scenarios based on modifying fundamental properties of the dark matter have been proposed. We show that general principles of quantum mechanics, in particular unitarity, imply interesting constraints on two pro- posals: collisional dark matter proposed by Spergel & Steinhardt, and strongly annihilating dark matter proposed by Kaplinghat, Knox & Turner. Efficient scattering required in both implies m <∼ 12 GeV and m <∼ 25 GeV respectively. The same arguments show that the strong annihilation in the second scenario implies the presence of significant elastic scattering, particularly for large enough masses. Recently, a variant of the collisional scenario has been advocated to satisfy simultaneously constraints from dwarf galaxies to clusters, with a cross section that scales inversely with velocity. We show that this scenario likely involves super-elastic processes, and the associated kinetic en- ergy change must be taken into account when making predictions. Exceptions and implications for experimental searches are discussed. 98.89.Cq; 98.80.Es; 98.62.Gq; 11.80.Et; 11.55Bq I. INTRODUCTION Griest and Kamionkowski [9] previously derived similar mass bounds related to the freeze-out density of thermal There is a long history of efforts to constrain dark mat- relics, assuming 2-body final states. In §II, we provide ter properties from galactic structure (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraining the Particle Nature of Dark Matter: Model-Independent Tests from the Intersection of Theory and Observation
    CONSTRAINING THE PARTICLE NATURE OF DARK MATTER: MODEL-INDEPENDENT TESTS FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THEORY AND OBSERVATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Gregory Daniel Mack, B.A., M.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Prof. John F. Beacom, Adviser Prof. James Beatty Adviser Prof. Eric Braaten Graduate Program in Prof. Terrence Walker Physics ABSTRACT Dark matter is one of the greatest mysteries of modern astrophysics. It comprises about 83% of the matter density in the Universe and approximately 22% of the total energy density, yet its identity and particle properties are unknown. Gravitational interactions reveal its presence, but it does not readily interact with light or nor- mal matter. The purpose of this dissertation is to provide insight into the particle properties of this exotic type of matter in a model-independent fashion. Dark mat- ter is expected to be its own antiparticle, but the strength of its self-annihilation is not known. It is often assumed to be consistent with that which gives the correct abundance if dark matter were produced as a thermal relic in the early Universe, but that has not been proven. Constraints on the dark matter self-annihilation cross section are found over a wide range of masses, both for the separate cases of monoen- ergetic neutrino and monoenergetic photon production, and the corresponding limits on the total self-annihilation cross section. This is done by comparing the theoretical flux from a region of annihilating dark matter to observational data of that region.
    [Show full text]