DOCSLIB.ORG

The Shakespeare Association of America I » 1982 Meeting ((

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Shakespeare Association of America I » 1982 Meeting (( THE SHAKESPEARE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA I » 1982 MEETING (( APRIL 8TH , 10TH MARQUETTE HoTEL MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA THE SHAKESPEARE ASSOCIATION TENTH ANNIVERSARY OF AMERICA OF President, BERNARD BECKERMAN (Columbia Unitersic:v) THE SHAKESPEARE AssociATION oF AMERICA Executit•e Secretary, ANN ) ENNALIE CooK (Vanderbilt University) Adminismuit·e Assistant, RoSEMARY ALLEN (Vanderbilt Unit•ersity) INCORPORATED 1972 TRUSTEES )OHN ANDREWS S. SCHOENBAUM (Folger Shakespeare Library) (Unit·ersity of Maryland) ANNUAL MEETINGS )ONAS BARISH CHARLES SHATTUCK (Unit•ersity of California, Berkeley) (University of Illinois) MARCH 29-31, 1973 STATLER HILTON HoTEL, WASHINGTON, D.C. ANNUAL LECTURER, HARRY LEVIN (Harvard University) STEPHEN BooTH SUSAN SNYDER (University of California, Berkeley) (Swarthmore College) MARCH 28-30, 1974 HuNTINGTON-SHERATON HoTEL, PASADENA, CALIFORNIA ANNUAL LECTURER, RoBERT B. HEILMAN (University of Washington) THELMA GREENFIELD R. W. VAN FossEN (Unit•ersity of Oregon) (University of Toronto) MARCH 20-22, 1975 SHERATON PARK PLAZA HoTEL, NEw HAVEN, CoNNECTICUT ANNUAL LECTURER, HALLETT D. SMITH (Huntington Library) LOCAL ARRANGEMENTS *APRIL 19-25, 1976 STATLER HILTON HOTEL, WASHINGTON, D.C. THOMAS CLAYTON (Unit•ersity of Minnesota) ANNUAL LECTURER, KENNETH MuiR (University of Liverpool) WITH THE ASS ISTANCE OF MARSHA L. RIEBE, ExEcuTivE AssiSTANT, AcADEMIC AFFAIRS, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA APRIL 7-9, 1977 FAIRMONT HoTEL, NEw ORLEANS, LouiSIANA ANNUAL LECTURER, EuGENE W AITH (Yale University) WELCOMING COMMITTEE APRIL 13-15, 1978 HYATT REGENCY HoTEL, ToRONTO, ONTARIO AGNES MARIE FLECK (College of St. Scholastica) ANNUAL LECTURER, VIRGIL WHITAKER (Stanford University) SHIRLEY NELSON GARNER (Unit•ersity of Minnesota) MADELON GoHLKE (University of Minnesota) APRIL 12-14, 1979 SIR FRANCIS DRAKE HoTEL, SAN FRANCISCo, CALIFORNIA LowELL E. JoHNSON (St. Olaf College) ANNUAL LECTURER, G. K. HuNTER (Yale University) GoRDON LELL (Concordia College, Moorhead) CATHERINE LuPORI (College of St. Carherine) APRIL 3-5, 1980 HYATT REGENCY HoTEL, CAMBRIDGE, MAssAcHUSETTS MARIE T ARSITANO (Moorhead State Unit·ersit:) ANNUAL LECTURER, ALVIN KERNAN (Princeton University) *AuGUST 1-7, 1981 HILTON HoTEL, STRATFORD-UPON-AvoN, ENGLAND INSTITUTIONAL HOST ANNUAL LECTURER, G. E. BENTLEY (Princeton University) UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA APRIL 8-10, 1982 MARQUETTE HoTEL, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA WITH SPECIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE DEPARTMENTS OF ENGLISH OF ANNUAL LECTURER, MADELEINE DoRAN (University of Wisconsin) BETHEL ConEGE·ST. PAuL, CARLETON CoLLEGE, CoNCORDIA CoLLEGE-MooRHEAD, CoLLEGE OF ST. CATHERINE, AND ST. OLAF CoLLEGE; AND THE HuMANITIES DIVISION OF CoNCORDIA CoLLEGE-ST. PAUL *)OINT MEETING WITH INTERNATIONAL SHAKESPEARE AssociATION. PROGRAM PRESIDENTS 1973-1974 G. E. BeNTLEY (Princewn Univcrsicv) THURSDAY, FRIDAY, AND SATURDAY 1974-1975 MAOELE!.'> E DoRAN (Univcrsit:< o/ \\Yiscon;in) 1975-1976 MAYNARD MACK (Ya le University) 1976-1977 DAviD BEVINGTON (University of Chicago) 1977-1978 RoBERT ORNSTEIN (Crue Western Rescne Unitersity) BooK ExHIBIT 1978-1979 C. L. BARBER (University of California, Santa Cmz) [West Ballroom] 1979-1980 CHARLE~ SHATTUCK (Universitv of Illinois) 1980-1981 S. ScHOCNBAUM (University of Maryland) I 1981-1982 NoRMA:>~ RABKIN (University of California, Berkeley) ..I "THE FLoURISHING AGE:: GEOGRAPHY AND TRAVEL IN SHAKESPEARE's ENGLAND" TRUSTEES [James Ford Bell Library, University of Minnesota] jOHN ANDREWS, 1979-1982 RoBERT HEILMAN, 1977-1979 (Folger Shakespeare Library) (University of Wruhington ) "IMPRESSIONISM AND THE MoDERN VIsioN" joNAS BARISH, 1981-1984 [Minneapolis Institute of Arts] (University of California, Berkeley) MRs. DoNALD F. HYDE, 197 3-1975 (Four Oaks Farm Library) ). LEEDS BARROLL, 1973-1976 (Unit•ersity of Maryland, RoBERT E. KNOLL, 197 3-1976 Baltimore County) (Universi ty of Nebrruka) THURSDAY BERNARD BECKERMAN, 1975-1978 )ILL LEVENSON, 1978-1981 12:00 noon to 4:30p.m. (Columbia University) (Unit·ersity of Toronto) STEPHEN BooTH, 1980-1983 RICHARD L. LEVIN , 1977-1980 REGISTRATION (Urtiversity of California, Berkeley) (State Unit'ersity of New York, Stony Broo~) [West Ballroom] DoLORA CuNNINGHAM, 1973-1976 (San Francisco State Uniuersity) ELEANOR PRossER, 197 5-1978 (Stanford Unit:ersit)) 1:00 p.m . to 3:30p.m. G. BLAKEMORE EVANS, 1975-1978 PRESIDENT's OPEN H ousE (Harvard University) NORMAN RA!!KIN, 1976-1979 (University of California, Berkele:) [West Ballroom] THELMA GREENFIELD, 1981-1984 (Universir:y of Oregon) )EANNE RoBEl\TS, 1978-1981 (American University) 4:30p.m. to 5:30p.m. joHN C. GuiLDS, )R., 1973-1974 (Universir:y of South Carolina) S. ScHOENBAUM, 1976-1979 CoNcERT (University of Maryland) 0. B. HARDISON, 1973-1975 CoNCENTUS. Musicus RENAISSANCE ENSEMBLE (Folger Shakespeare Library) SusAN SNYDER, 1980-1983 [Alumni Club, 50th Floor, IDS Tower] (Swarthmore College) )OAN HARTWIG, 1979-1981 (Universir:y of Kentucky) R. W. VAN FossEN, 1979-1982 5:30p.m. to 7:30p.m. (University of Toronto) CHAMPAGNE AND HoRs D'0EUVRES RoBERT H. WEST, 1973 -1 975 MINSTRELS FROM CoNCENTUS Musicus ENSEMBLE (Unit·ersity of Georgia) [Alumni Club, 50th Floor, IDS Tower} IV Topic: NEw CRITICISM: OF PICTURE AND PLACE FRIDAY {Mondale-Humphrey Room] 8:00a.m. to I2:00 noon Chainnan, ]oHN W. VELz (University of Texas) REGISTRATION 1. "SHAKESPEARE's IMAGERY: EMBLEM AND THE IMITATION oF NATURE" {Ballroom Foyer] JuDITH DuNDAS (University of Illinois, Urbana) 2. "THE Two FACES OF EPHEsus: SociAL ExPERIENCE IN The Comedy of Errors" 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. GAIL KERN PASTER (George Washington University) I Topic: SHAKESPEARE's EARLY PLAYS [Ballroom] 10:30 a.m. to I2:00 noon TouR OF THE TYRONE GuTHRIE THEATRE Chainnan, SusAN BAKER (University of Nevada, Reno) [Vineland Place} I. l "SHREWD AND KINDLY FARCE" PETER SACCIO (Dartmouth College) 2. "Titus Andronicus AND THE WOUNDS OF CIVIL WAR" I2:00 noon EuGENE W AITH (Yale University) LuNCHEON II Topic: AFTER The Tempest: SHAKESPEARE's LAST PLAYS [Ballroom] [Mondale-Humphrey Room] Presiding, BERNARD BECKERMAN (Columbia University) Chainnan, ScoTT CoLLEY (Vanderbilt University) 1." 'BEAR Us LIKE THE TIME': AND Henry VIII The Two Noble Kinsmen" 2:00 J>.m. to 3:00 J>.m. CYRUS HoY (University of Rochester) V Topic: SHAKESPEARE's DRAMATIC LANGUAGE z." 'THE UNFOLDING OF A DESIGN': PATTERNS OF MEANING IN Henr)' VIII" BARBARA MowAT (Auburn University) [Ballroom] Chairman, DEREK CRAWLEY (Queen's University) 10:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. 1. "SHAKESPEARE's LANGUAGE oF SExuALITY" CoFFEE BREAK CAROL THOMAS NEELY (Illinois State University) [Ballroom Foyer] 2. "METAPHORS OF HEALTH: FooD, SPORT, AND LIFE-PRESERVING REsT" GEORGE WALTON WILLIAMS (Duke University) 10:30 a.m. to II :30 a.m. VI Topic: SHAKESPEARE's NoN-DRAMATIC LANGUAGE III Topic: NEw CRITICISM I: ON REGRESSION [Mondale-Humphrey Room] [Ballroom] Chainnan, DAVID GEoRGE (Urbana College) Chainnan, ] . LEEDS BARROLL (University of Maryland, Baltimore County) 1. "SouND COINCIDENCES IN Shake-speares Sonnets" MARGRETA DE GRAZIA (Georgetown University) 1. "THE ABSENT MoTHER IN King Lear" CaPPELlA KAHN (Wesleyan University) z. "THE PLACE OF Lucrece" MARION TROUSDALE (University of Maryland) z. "Richard II AND THE PoLITICS OF REGRESSION" DAVID SuNDELSON (California Institute of Technology) X SHAKESPEAREAN UNITS OF AcTioN: ANALYSIS 3:30p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Seminar: [Bierman Room} VII Seminar: THE CAPITALIST PLAYHOUSE Chairman, CHARLES HALLETT (Fordham University) [Garland Room} Participants: MAURICE CHARNEY (Rutgers University), DoMINICK]. HART Chairman, HERBERT BERRY (University of Saskatchewan) (Eastern Kentucky University), ]AMES E. HIRSH (University of Hawaii), Participants: GRAHAM C. ADAMS (Acadia University), ]OHN H. BuRNET M. HoBGOOD (University of Illinois, Urbana), HARRY KEYISHIAN AsTINGTON (University of Toronto), RoBERT E. BuRKHART (Eastern (Fairleigh Dickinson University), ARTHUR HENRY KrNG (Brigham Young Kentucky University), S. P. CERASANO (Colgate University), WALTER University), BARBARA C. MARKSON (Columbia University), SHIRLEY MoRGAN CoHEN (Cornell University), ANN ]ENNALIE CooK (Vanderbilt University), (Chadron State College), ]. R. MuLRYNE (University of Warwick), RICHARD HosLEY (University of Arizona), WILLIAM INGRAM (University of FRANCIS R. OLLEY (St. Joseph's University), Lours CHARLES STAGG Michigan), SEYMOUR IsENBERG (Norwood, New Jersey), LEONARD KERPELMAN (Memphis State University), AuDREY STANLEY (University of California, (Baltimore, Maryland), RosLYN L. KNUTSON (University of Arkansas, Santa Cruz), HoMER D. SwANDER (University of California, Santa Barbara) Little Rock), RICHARD C. KoHLER (San Diego State University), ]oHN ORRELL (University of Alberta), ANDREW]. SABOL (Brown University) XI Seminar: SELF-REFLEXIVE THEMES AND DEVICES IN SHAKESPEARE's PLAYS [Board Room] VIII Seminar: THE PRACTICE OF THEATRE HISTORY [Mayo Room] Chairman, ]EAN HoWARD (Syracuse University) Chairman, RALPH BERRY (University of Ottawa) Participants: MARGARET]. ARNOLD (University of Kansas), PETER BEREK (Williams College), ]AMES C. BuLMAN (Allegheny College), Participants: R. MARK BENBOW (Colby College), RoNALD BRYDEN ANNETTE DREW-BEAR (University of California, Santa Barbara), (University of Toronto), ]OAN BYLES (Syracuse University), ALAN RoBERT EGAN (University of California, Santa Barbara), EuGENE HuGHES CARY M. MAZER (University of Victoria), (University of ENGLAND (Brigham Young University), RrcHARD FLY (State University of Pennsylvania), ]EANNE T. NEWLIN (Harvard University), RoLF SoELLNER New York, Buffalo), BARBARA FREEDMAN (California Institute
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Selected Contemporary Allusions
    Appendix A Selected Contemporary Allusions 1. Robert Greene, Groats- Worth of Witte ( 1592). Quoted and discussed above, pp. 1-6, 53-4. See also Appendix B. 2. Henry Chettle, Kind-Harts Dreame (1592; SR 8 Dec. 1592), from the Epistle, 'To the Gentlemen Readers'. Discussed pp. 7, 21. he that offendes being forst, is more excusable than the wilfull faultie ... lie shew reason for my present writing, and after proceed to sue for pardon. About three moneths since died M. Robert Greene, leauing many papers in sundry Booke sellers hands, among other his Groats­ worth of wit, in which a letter written to diuers play-makers, is offensiuely by one or two of them taken, and because on the dead they cannot be auenged, they wilfully forge in their conceites a liuing Author: and after tossing it two and fro, no remedy, but it must light on me. How I haue all the time of my conuersing in printing hindred the bitter inueying against schollers, it hath been very well knowne, and how in that I dealt I can sufficiently prooue. With neither of them that take offence was I acquainted, and with one of them I care not if I neuer be: The other (i.e. Shakespeare], whome at that time I did not so much spare, as since I wish I had, for that as I haue moderated the heate of liuing writers, and might haue vsde my owne discretion (especially in such a case) the Author beeing dead, that I did not, I am as sory, as if the originall fault had beene my fault, because my selfe haue seene his demeanor no !esse ciuill than he exelent in the qualitie he professes: Besides, diuers of worship haue reported, his vprightnes of dealing, which argues his honesty, and his facetious grace in writting, that aprooues his Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1. Andrew Gurr, The Shakespearean Stage, 1574–1642, 3rd edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 191. 2. For further discussion of the myth of the bare stage see Chapter 1 of this book; Jonathan Gil Harris and Natasha Korda, ‘Introduction: Towards a Materialist Account of Stage Properties’, in Jonathan Gil Harris and Natasha Korda (eds.), Staged Properties in Early Modern English Drama (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 2–7. 3. Aristotle Poetics (trans. Stephen Halliwell) (London: Harvard University Press, 1995), VII.16–20, p. 55. 4. Glynne Wickham, ‘Heavens, Machinery, and Pillars in the Early Theatre and Other Early Playhouse’, in Herbert Berry (ed.), The First Public Playhouse: The Theatre in Shoreditch, 1576–1598 (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1979), p. 6. 5. Thomas H. Dickinson (ed.), Robert Greene (London: Fisher Unwin, 1911), pp. lix–lxi. 6. Kenneth Muir, ‘Robert Greene as Dramatist’, in Richard Hosley (ed.), Essays on Shakespeare and Elizabethan Drama in Honor of Hardin Craig (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963), p. 48; Charles W. Crupi, Robert Greene (Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1986), p. 115; Charles Mills Gayley, Representative English Comedies (London: Macmillan, 1903), p. 419. 7. Bernard Beckerman, Shakespeare at the Globe, 1599–1609 (New York: Macmillan, 1962); Gerald Eades Bentley, The Professions of Dramatist and Player in Shakespeare’s Time, 1590–1642 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986); T. J. King, Shakespearean Staging, 1599–1642 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971); Andrew Gurr, Playgoing in Shakespeare’s London, 3rd edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004); S. P. Cerasano, ‘Editing the Theatre, Translating the Stage’, Analytic and Enumerative Bibliography, 4 (1990), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir John Oldcastle and the Construction of Shakespeare's
    SEL38 (1998) ISSN 0039-3657 SirJohn Oldcastle and the Construction of Shakespeare's Authorship DOUGLAS A. BROOKS Let vs returne vnto the Bench againe, And there examine further of this fray. -SirJohn Oldcastle, I.i.124-5 A decade ago the editors of the Oxford William Shakespeare: The CompleteWorks replaced the name of the character called Falstaff in Henry IVPart Iwith a hypothetically earlier version of the character's name, Sir John Oldcastle. The restoration of Oldcastle to the Oxford edition makes it the first authoritative text to undo an alteration which, as scholars have long suspected, Shakespeare himself must have made sometime between a non-extant 1596 performance text and the 1598 quarto of the play. The resulting scholarly debate over this editorial decision has touched on a number of significant issues linked to the authority and authenticity of "Shakespearean" texts, and it has raised important questions about how these texts were shaped by the material, religious, and political conditions in which they were produced.l In the case of HenryIVPart I, crit- ics have struggled to reconstruct how an early version of the text with Oldcastle as the protagonist of the unworthy knight plot might have placed the play and its author in a complicated Douglas A. Brooks recently completed his Ph.D. at Columbia University, and is assistant professor of Shakespeare and Renaissance Drama at Texas A&M University. He is currently working on a book about early modern dramatic authorship and print. 334 SIR JOHN OLDCASTLE position between an individual's reputation and a nation's.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning to See the Theological Vision of Shakespeare's King Lear
    Learning to See the Theological Vision of Shakespeare’s King Lear Learning to See the Theological Vision of Shakespeare’s King Lear By Greg Maillet Learning to See the Theological Vision of Shakespeare’s King Lear By Greg Maillet This book first published 2016 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2016 by Greg Maillet All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-9729-9 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-9729-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS Polemical Prologue .................................................................................... vii Criticism, Theology, and the Value of Shakespeare’s King Lear Chapter One ................................................................................................. 1 “See Better”: Christian Paradox in Act One of King Lear Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 27 “I Nothing Am”: Confusion and Clarification of Identity in Act Two of King Lear Chapter Three ............................................................................................ 51 “This Night will turn us all to Fools and Madmen”: Storm and the Transformation of Identity
    [Show full text]
  • Kenneth Muir
    KENNETH MUIR Copyright © The British Academy 1998 – all rights reserved Kenneth Arthur Muir 1907–1996 KENNETH MUIR was one of the most eminent Shakespearean scholars and critics of our time. As editor of five of the plays and author of a large number of books and essays on the plays and poems, he is read all over the world. His beautiful speaking of poetry and the lucid and witty presentation of his learning inspired lecture audiences at home and abroad. He generously promoted the work of others, not least as editor of Shakespeare Survey and as the first Chairman and later the President of the International Shakespeare Association. His own work was not limited to Shakespeare: the subjects of his more than fifty books and his almost innumerable articles range from Wyatt, through Renaissance and Romantic writers, to modern poetry and fiction. His range also extended beyond the confines of the English language, to translations of Racine and Corneille and of Golden Age Spanish drama. His zest and industry remained undiminished until shortly before his death, and in terms of publication he was as productive in the twenty years after his retirement from the King Alfred Chair of English Literature in the University of Liverpool as he had been during the forty-five years of his uncommonly active professional life in York, Leeds, and Liverpool. As the fell sergeant Death moves more swiftly than publishers, new essays by him are still appearing, more than a year after his death. The latest of these is a counter-blast to what he saw as ‘Base Uses’ of Shakespeare: characteristic of a scholar and man who, in the words of Ernst Honigmann, the recipient of the Festschrift to which this essay was contrib- uted, was ‘an immense force on the side of sanity and goodness (I can think of no other word) in an increasingly wicked world’.
    [Show full text]
  • 00-Inicio Nº 15.FH11
    Jorge Luis Bueno Alonso Jorge Luis Bueno Alonso A Note for Future Queries on Shakespeare’s Sonnet 116 ... 137 A Note for Future Queries on Shakespeare’s Sonnet 116 ... 137 A Note for Future Queries on Shakespeare’s Sonnet 116: is it a A Note for Future Queries on Shakespeare’s Sonnet 116: is it a Condensed Explanatory résumé of Othello’s Mistakes? Condensed Explanatory résumé of Othello’s Mistakes? Jorge Luis Bueno Alonso Jorge Luis Bueno Alonso University of Vigo University of Vigo Shakespeare’s Sonnet 116 –“Let me not to the Shakespeare’s Sonnet 116 –“Let me not to the marriage of true minds”– has always been read as an marriage of true minds”– has always been read as an attempt a) to define love’s constancy in a world of change, attempt a) to define love’s constancy in a world of change, b) to describe an unaltered and unalterable ideal of true b) to describe an unaltered and unalterable ideal of true love, or even c) to set up a rhetorical rebuttal of the very love, or even c) to set up a rhetorical rebuttal of the very concept of everlasting love. Be as it may, a given reading concept of everlasting love. Be as it may, a given reading is always debatable, incomplete and equally defendable if is always debatable, incomplete and equally defendable if well exposed. In my case, every time I read this sonnet I well exposed. In my case, every time I read this sonnet I have always remembered, perhaps unconsciously, Othello, have always remembered, perhaps unconsciously, Othello, the persona, and the mistakes he commits all along the the persona, and the mistakes he commits all along the play.
    [Show full text]
  • "Undivided Loves": Coordination and Coherence in Shakespeare's Sonnets Jay Curlin Ouachita Baptist University, [email protected]
    Ouachita Baptist University Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita Articles Faculty Publications Spring 1999 "Undivided Loves": Coordination and Coherence in Shakespeare's Sonnets Jay Curlin Ouachita Baptist University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/articles Part of the Literature in English, British Isles Commons Recommended Citation Curlin, Jay, ""Undivided Loves": Coordination and Coherence in Shakespeare's Sonnets" (1999). Articles. 130. https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/articles/130 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "Undivided loves": Coordtnalion and Coherence in Shakespeare's Sonnels Let me confess that we two must be twain, Although our undivided loves are one. (Sonnet 36) The reader of touay is generally accustomed to thinking of the sonnets of William Shakespeare as isolated, independent lyric poems. While anthologies have certainly kept alive something of Shakespeare's memory as a writer of nondramatic verse, doing their part to ensure that, "so long as men can breathe or eyes can see," at least certain of his more famous sonnets will continue to live, they have also tended to strengthen the perception that one should approach Shakespeare's sonnets individually, with little sense of any larger context of which they might be a part. Indeed, it has been suggested that those of Shakespeare's sonnets that have been made popular to a general audience by their regular inclusion in anthologies are precisely those that can be most easily severed from the sequence, and that those that bear clear traces of having been taken from a sequence have no hope of ever achiev­ ing the more permanent renown of an "anthology piece" (Crossman 481).
    [Show full text]
  • (PDF) Othello (Penguin Shakespeare) William Shakespeare, Kenneth Muir, Stanley W
    (PDF) Othello (Penguin Shakespeare) William Shakespeare, Kenneth Muir, Stanley W. Wells, T. J. B. Spencer, T. Mcalindon - pdf free book online free Othello (Penguin Shakespeare), online pdf Othello (Penguin Shakespeare), Othello (Penguin Shakespeare) Popular Download, read online free Othello (Penguin Shakespeare), Read Online Othello (Penguin Shakespeare) Book, Othello (Penguin Shakespeare) Free PDF Online, online pdf Othello (Penguin Shakespeare), Read Othello (Penguin Shakespeare) Full Collection, pdf free download Othello (Penguin Shakespeare), by William Shakespeare, Kenneth Muir, Stanley W. Wells, T. J. B. Spencer, T. McAlindon pdf Othello (Penguin Shakespeare), Download Online Othello (Penguin Shakespeare) Book, Free Download Othello (Penguin Shakespeare) Full Version William Shakespeare, Kenneth Muir, Stanley W. Wells, T. J. B. Spencer, T. McAlindon, Download PDF Othello (Penguin Shakespeare) Free Online, Read Othello (Penguin Shakespeare) Online Free, Othello (Penguin Shakespeare) Free Download, PDF Othello (Penguin Shakespeare) Full Collection, Read Othello (Penguin Shakespeare) Full Collection, Read Othello (Penguin Shakespeare) Online Free, pdf free download Othello (Penguin Shakespeare), Othello (Penguin Shakespeare) Full Collection, CLICK FOR DOWNLOAD azw, epub, mobi, pdf Description: When I was at school yesterday the family's car went missing, said Tom Wienger-Chiwa who is currently in hospital with a rare back injury. We got home about 20 minutes before we heard anything. He couldn't see himself until he saw that it appeared
    [Show full text]
  • Love Relationships and Cuckoldry in Othello and Much Ado Elizabeth Falconer Denison University
    Articulāte Volume 3 Article 6 1998 "My Life Upon Her Faith": Love Relationships and Cuckoldry in Othello and Much Ado Elizabeth Falconer Denison University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.denison.edu/articulate Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Falconer, Elizabeth (1998) ""My Life Upon Her Faith": Love Relationships and Cuckoldry in Othello and Much Ado," Articulāte: Vol. 3 , Article 6. Available at: http://digitalcommons.denison.edu/articulate/vol3/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Denison Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articulāte by an authorized editor of Denison Digital Commons. 34 Wyatt Holliday genre, which I think bear stating (or repeating, at tan in return for his escape, is thrown from a moun- least). First, whenever a someone becomes involved tain-top by the same Satan, left alive where he falls so "MY LIFE UPON HER FAITH": LOVE RELATIONSHIPS AND CUCKOLDRY in an incestuous relationship, that person is doomed. that the birds, animals and bugs may pick his body IN OTHELLO AND MUCH ADO But secondly, and of paramount importance, I would apart while he still breathes. assert that the presence of incest in at least these two With this final image of horror, it is obvious BY ELIZABETH FALCONER '00 Gothic novels displays the ultimate power of the that the convention of incest within the Gothic genre Love relationships and marriage during the would simply endure mere disapproval from the com- Christian (or Catholic) Church. Beatrice cannot was used for the most part to invoke disgust and ab- Renaissance boasted very specific social roles for both munity.
    [Show full text]
  • Othello, Macbeth , and King Hear
    R M Christofides Shakespeare and Equivocation Language and the Doom in Hamlet, Othello, Macbeth , and King Hear PhD Cardiff University 2008 UMI Number: U584315 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U584315 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 DECLARATION This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not currently submitted^candidature for any degree. Signed ........... .. (candidate) Date STATEMENT 1 This thesis is being submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD. Signed (candidate) Date .... .. STATEMENT 2 This thesis is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated^Other sources are acknowledged by explicit references. S igned ffl. : ... .. (candidate) D ate m / p .i / o Z. STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the tide and summary to be made available to outside organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • “A Rarity Most Beloved”: Shakespeare and the Idea of Tragedy David Scott Kastan
    1 “A rarity most beloved”: Shakespeare and the Idea of Tragedy David Scott Kastan All words are pockets into which now this, now that is put, and sometimes many things at once. Friedrich Nietzsche, The Wanderer and his Shadow It is upon the pillars of the great tragedies – Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, and Macbeth1 – that Shakespeare’s reputation most securely rests, and indeed it is the tragic plays in general that seem most robustly to confirm Shakespeare’s greatness. The tragedies arguably test the emotional resources of their readers and audiences more strenuously than the comedies or histories, confirming a generic bias that Shakespeare’s own age often expressed. In the Induction to A Warning for Fair Women (1599), Tragedy, with whip in one hand and a knife in the other, appears on stage to insist upon her supremacy in the repertory: Comedy is but “slight & childish,” designed merely “To tickle shallow iniudiciall eares,” but Tragedy is made of sterner stuff. Its claim to “raigne as Queene / In great Apollos name and all the Muses” (Ind., 75–6) rests upon its ability to present passions that must moue the soule, Make the heart heauie and throb within the bosome, Extorting teares out of the strictest eyes, To racke a thought and straine it to his forme, Untill I rap the sences from their course. This is my office. (Induction, 44–8) And although Comedy aggressively contests Tragedy’s claim to generic preeminence, asserting the stultifying predictability of its plots (“some damnd tyrant to obtaine a crowne, / Stabs, hangs, impoysons, smoothers, cutteth throats”; 49–50), many would assent to Tragedy’s aesthetic superiority, like Kyd’s Heironomo, finding Comedy easy and self-indulgent, only “fit for common wits” (The Spanish Tragedy, 4.1.157).
    [Show full text]
  • The Shakespearean Stage
    InMedia The French Journal of Media Studies 7.1. | 2018 Visualizing Consumer Culture Visualising Commodity, Consuming Visual Commodities: the Shakespearean Stage Stephanie Mercier Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/inmedia/1276 DOI: 10.4000/inmedia.1276 ISSN: 2259-4728 Publisher Center for Research on the English-Speaking World (CREW) Electronic reference Stephanie Mercier, « Visualising Commodity, Consuming Visual Commodities: the Shakespearean Stage », InMedia [Online], 7.1. | 2018, Online since 20 December 2018, connection on 08 September 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/inmedia/1276 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/inmedia. 1276 This text was automatically generated on 8 September 2020. © InMedia Visualising Commodity, Consuming Visual Commodities: the Shakespearean Stage 1 Visualising Commodity, Consuming Visual Commodities: the Shakespearean Stage Stephanie Mercier Introduction FALSTAFF I bought him in Paul’s, and he’ll buy me a horse in Smithfield. An I could get me but a wife in the stews, I were manned, horsed, and wived. (2 Henry IV, 1.2.44-46) 1 Commodities for sale could be found everywhere in early modern London but exchange goods were not limited to concrete marketplace items. Falstaff’s tongue-in-cheek consumerist tour of its low life areas allows Shakespeare’s audiences the experience of the purchase of animals in Smithfield, serving men looking for employment in St. Paul’s and prostitutes in the Stews, so called because of the frequent use of public hot- air bath-houses, or stews, for dissolute purposes.1 Shakespeare’s language thus presents people as exchange goods in certain particular cases and suggests the early modern mindset could place animals, humans and merchandise on an undifferentiated par for value.
    [Show full text]