DOCSLIB.ORG

State of Play of the Bologna Process in the Tempus Partner Countries (2012) Mapping by Country

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State of Play of the Bologna Process in the Tempus Partner Countries (2012) Mapping by Country TEMPUS Programme State of Play of the Bologna Process in the Tempus Partner Countries (2012) Mapping by country April 2012 http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus State of Play of the Bologna Process in the Tempus Partner Countries (2012) Mapping by country This document has been produced within the framework of the European Union's Tempus programme, which is funded by the Directorate-General for Development and Co-operation - EuropeAid and the Directorate-General for Enlargement. The data for this report has been provided by the National Tempus Offices, in agreement with the national authorities and the EU Delegations of the countries concerned. The preparation of the report would not have been possible without the close collaboration and support provided by Eurydice, the network on education systems and policies in Europe and the Bologna Follow-Up Group. Education Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency Unit P10 – Tempus & Bilateral Cooperation with Industrialised Countries Office address: Rue Colonel Bourg, 135-139 - 1140 Bruxelles – Belgique Postal address: Avenue du Bourget, 1 - 1140 Bruxelles - Belgique Phone: (32-2) 299.68.67 – Fax: (32-2) 299.45.30 State of play of the Bologna Process in the Tempus Partner Countries (2012) – Mapping by country 1 Contents Introduction 3 Implementation of the Bologna Process in the Tempus Partner Countries 5 Central Asia 7 Eastern Europe 19 Southern Mediterranean 35 Western Balkans 57 Glossary of countries 69 Brief overview of the Tempus programme 71 Tempus Participation 73 Overview of the Bologna Process 75 Authors 81 The series "A Tempus Study" 83 State of play of the Bologna Process in the Tempus Partner Countries (2012) – Mapping by country 2 State of play of the Bologna Process in the Tempus Partner Countries (2012) – Mapping by country 3 Introduction The aim of this publication is to illustrate to which extent the Bologna Process is being implemented in the TEMPUS Partner Countries. For each country, it provides a fact sheet for the reader, with a brief overview of the extent of voluntary convergence with the European Higher Education Area and the state of play of adoption of the Bologna principles and tools. Each fact sheet outlines the main elements of the Bologna process in a synthetic way. The information comes from the recently published study on the 'State of Play of the Bologna Process in the Tempus Partner Countries (2012)'1 and this report can be considered as a complementary working document. It should be borne in mind, when comparing the different countries, that the adoption of Bologna principles and approaches is a voluntary process. Countries started to get involved at different stages and the pace of reform varies, depending on the local context and the priorities of the countries. 1 'State of Play of the Bologna Process in the Tempus Partner Countries (2012)', A Tempus Study, No 9, April 2012, EACEA, Brussels. State of play of the Bologna Process in the Tempus Partner Countries (2012) – Mapping by country 4 State of play of the Bologna Process in the Tempus Partner Countries (2012) – Mapping by country 5 Implementation of the Bologna Process in the Tempus Partner Countries Eleven Tempus Partner Countries have signed the Bologna Declaration (Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Montenegro, Russia, Serbia and Ukraine) and are therefore committed to implement its principles and tools (Map 1). Map 1: Tempus Partner Countries and the Bologna Process, 2011 Tempus Bologna-Signatory Countries Other Tempus Partner Countries European Union Member States In the remaining countries which are not officially part of the process, the Bologna approach is used on a voluntary basis, as a source of inspiration to support on-going reforms. As a result, notable differences are evident in the mode of implementation (Map 2). In Algeria, Kosovo2, Morocco and Tunisia, the Bologna Process is officially embedded in their education systems. It has been introduced in the legislation and has become part of the national strategy. In contrast, the Bologna Process is currently implemented on a voluntary basis using incentive mechanisms in Belarus, Egypt, Israel, the occupied Palestinian territory, 2 This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence. State of play of the Bologna Process in the Tempus Partner Countries (2012) – Mapping by country 6 Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Ad hoc groups, including the Tempus Higher Education Reform Experts (HEREs) and Commissions, under the supervision of the Ministry of Education, often play a major role. In Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, there is no specific mechanism for supporting the implementation of the Bologna Process apart from the Tempus Higher Education Reform Experts, who disseminate information on Bologna to both institutions and Ministries. Map 2: Methods of Implementation of the Bologna Process, 2011 Bologna-Signatory Countries Non Bologna-Signatory Countries: Bologna Process officially embedded in the education system Bologna Process being implemented by ad hoc groups under the supervision of the Ministry of Education No particular mechanism supporting the implementation of the Bologna Process State of play of the Bologna Process in the Tempus Partner Countries (2012) – Mapping by country 7 CENTRAL ASIA Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan State of play of the Bologna Process in the Tempus Partner Countries (2012) – Mapping by country 8 The Bologna Process in Kazakhstan General Information X Bologna-Signatory Country (in 2010) Non Bologna-Signatory Country Level of integration in the Bologna Process officially embedded in the education system Bologna Process Bologna Process being implemented by ad hoc groups under the supervision of the Ministry of Education No particular mechanism supporting the implementation of the Bologna Process Bologna cycle structure Level of implementation of a three-cycle structure Extensive but gradual introduction of Bologna structure/ongoing adaptations or compliant with the enlargement Bologna Process Student workload/duration for the most common Bologna programmes 240 ECTS Bachelor programmes Master programmes Various combinations (4 academic years) Bachelor/master cycle structure models most 240+120 ECTS (4+2 academic years) commonly implemented European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) Definition of the Learning outcomes are defined in national steering documents and Learning Outcomes implemented through guidelines and recommendations Concept More than 75% of institutions and programmes are using ECTS for both Level of implementation transfer and accumulation purposes. Allocation of ECTS is based on learning of ECTS outcomes and student workload. Indicative number of hours of student 1 ECTS = 40 – 50 hours workload corresponding to one ECTS Bologna Diploma Supplement (DS) Level of implementation Bologna DS is issued to students in more than 75% of institutions and study of the Bologna Diploma programmes Supplement Bologna DS issued in the Diploma Supplement Bologna DS issued on request language of instruction issued and free of charge and/or more official languages State of play of the Bologna Process in the Tempus Partner Countries (2012) – Mapping by country 9 National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Not yet started formally/not foreseen. X Step 1: Decision taken. Process just started. Step 2: The purpose of the NQF has been agreed and the process is under way including discussions and consultations. Various committees have been established. Stage towards Step 3: The NQF has been adopted formally and the establishing a National implementation has started. Qualification Framework Step 4: Redesigning the study programmes is ongoing and the process is close to completion. Step 5: Overall process fully completed including self-certified compatibility with the Framework for qualifications of the European Higher Education Area. Quality Assurance Practices National Quality Assurance body Name Independent Kazakhstan Agency on Education Quality Assurance A Government-dependent body or Ministry has responsibility for quality Status assurance. Year of establishment 2008 Decision-making Participation No participation Involvement in external role quality assurance Academic staff X process Students X International X Experts Cross Border Evaluation: Institutions are allowed to choose a foreign quality assurance agency. Recognition of foreign qualifications Ratification of the Lisbon X 1997 (signature), 1998 (ratification) Recognition Convention Recognition of Foreign Recognition for academic study by central or regional governmental Qualifications for authorities academic study Recognition of Foreign Recognition for professional employment by central or regional governmental Qualifications for authorities professional employment Joint Degrees Establishment of joint degrees and programmes Joint programmes and joint degrees are not mentioned in the higher in higher education education legislation whatsoever. legislation State of play of the Bologna Process in the Tempus Partner Countries (2012) – Mapping by country 10 The Bologna Process in Kyrgyzstan General Information Bologna-Signatory Country X Non Bologna-Signatory Country Level of integration in the Bologna Process officially embedded in the education system Bologna Process Bologna Process being implemented by ad hoc groups under the X supervision of the Ministry
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tempus Study
    A TEMPUS STUDY EN 10.2797/49276 Overview of the Higher Education Systems in the Tempus Partner Countries Central Asia Tempus Issue 12 ― November 2012 http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus Overview of the Higher Education Systems in the Tempus Partner Countries Central Asia This document has been produced within the framework of the European Union's Tempus programme, which is funded by the EuropeAid Development and Co-operation Directorate-General and the Directorate-General for Enlargement. It has been prepared by the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) on the basis of contributions from the Tempus Offices and the authorities concerned. The approach and data collection have been implemented in collaboration with Eurydice, the network on education systems and policies in Europe. Preface The Tempus programme, launched in 1990, is one of the longest standing EU-funded programmes in the field of education. During more than 20 years of its existence, Tempus has supported the modernisation of higher education in the Partner Countries outside the European Union, namely in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, the Western Balkans and in the Southern Mediterranean. In order to carry out Tempus projects with higher education institutions in the Tempus Partner Countries, the knowledge of the system in which the institutions operate is crucial for the success of project activities. The higher education systems of the Partners Countries operate in different contexts and have different historical backgrounds. For this reason, the definition of the needs and the objectives of the projects should be based on knowledge of the reality in the country concerned and should take into account the existing policies and legislative developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Souvenir Booklet Jerusalem Conference 2020
    Jerusalem: From Past Divisions to a Shared Future? Balfour The Case for Equal Rights Souvenir Booklet from our Online Conference Held on 27th October 2020 Project Statement: Israel/Palestine: Equal Rights for lasting Peace The Balfour Project issued this statement at the end of the conference, signed by British Parliamentarians and Faith leaders, to be conveyed to the Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary. We acknowledge Britain’s historic responsibilities for inequality and discrimination in Jerusalem and across the Holy Land. They stem from the last century, through the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate for Palestine, with consequences which are still felt today. Past British responsibility for present injustice demands British commitment to work urgently for a better future, respecting equal rights. With British assistance, the Jewish people exercised their right to self-determination in the Holy Land more than 70 years ago. To this day, the Palestinian people are denied this right. This injustice must end. The future of Jerusalem is crucial to peace between Israelis and Palestinians, and between Israel and the Arab and Muslim worlds. The recent normalisation of relations between Israel and some Arab Gulf states is no substitute for a lasting peace founded on broad popular consent from Israelis and Palestinians. Sharing Jerusalem is essential to gain that consent. Palestinians and Israelis will share the Holy Land forever, and must shape its future together. Only equality will bring safety and well-being, and essential dialogue. The two peoples, alone, have not attained peaceful coexistence. So, for the good of both, and if we truly mean what we say, we in Britain must help reverse current negative developments which only entrench separation and inequality.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH MACEDONIA European Inventory on NQF 2018
    © Cedefop, 2019 NORTH MACEDONIA European inventory on NQF 2018 Introduction and context North Macedonia (1) became an EU candidate country in December 2005 and is currently being screened to start EU accession negotiations by June 2019 (ETF, 2018). The country has registered positive trends in recent years, such as a significant increase in tertiary education attainment (reaching 32.9% in 2018), and a reduction in the rate of early leavers from education and training (7.3% in 2018). With respect to other ET 2020 benchmarks, such as participation of adults in lifelong learning, participation in early childhood education and care, share of 15-year-olds with low achievement in reading, mathematics and science, and employment rate of recent graduates, the country is situated far below EU averages (2). Labour market indicators have shown gradual improvements since 2005, and in 2018 the unemployment rate (15 to 64 years old) reached a historical low level (21.1%). Youth unemployment (15 to 24 years old) is, however, still high, at 47.6% in 2018 (3), and there is a particularly high gender gap in activity and employment rates (4). Reforms have been underway in all parts of the education and training system. Significant improvement in transition to higher levels of education and training has been facilitated in the past decade through a number of education policies, such as making secondary education compulsory for all, streamlining progression routes of graduates from three-year VET programmes to four-year (1) Throughout this report, official national documents carry the internal denominations ‘Republic of Macedonia/Macedonian’, and not the EU officially designated ‘former Yugoslavian Republic of Macedonia’ or ‘Republic of North Macedonia'/'North Macedonian’ (as of 15.2.2019).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Tempus Projects Involving Georgian Heis 1995
    List of Tempus Projects involving Georgian HEIs (Except compact projects) Tempus I-II selection rounds 1996-1999 Project ID 10207 -1996 Project Type Tempus Tacis 1996 JEP Target Country GE Title Development and Restructuring of Higher Education in Immunology in Georgia Priority T510 - Medical Sciences Description Creation of a Caucasian Regional Training Centre for Clinical, Veterinary and Plant Immunology at Tbilisi State University aimed at restructuring higher education curricula in the field of medical care and agriculture. Duration 36 Tempus Grant 314,333.00 Euro Coordinating institution UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON (UNIVERSITY OF LONDON) Winderyer Institute of Medical Science 46, Cleveland Street - London WIP 6DB, United Kingdom Phone: +44/207/5049349 - Fax: +44/207/5049357 Email: [email protected] Contact person LYDYARD PETER Partners IVANE JAVAKHISHVILI STATE UNIVERSITY OF TBILISI - Tbilisi (GE) UNIVERSITE DE BRETAGNE OCCIDENTALE - Brest (FR) Project ID 10224 -1996 Project Type Tempus Tacis 1996 JEP Target Country GE Title Reconstruction of the Engineering curriculum at the GTU Priority T520 - Engineering and Technology Description To reconstruct and modernise Bachelors and Masters programmes and to provide updating and retraining for GTU staff in key technologies. To strengthen University links with Industry and to establish an Enterprise Support Centre. Duration 36 Tempus Grant 314,333.00 Euro Coordinating institution MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY John Dalton Extension, Chester Street - Manchester M1 5GD, United Kingdom;
    [Show full text]
  • LLL Policy in Armenia
    REPORT LIFE LONG LEARNING POLICY IN ARMENIA Table of Content Introduction ........................................................................2 Chapter 1: Situation Analysis ............................................ 4 Chapter 2: Gap Analysis..................................................... 9 Chapter 3: Gap Filling...................................................... 12 Chapter 4: Forecast............................................................14 List of References and Sources..........................................16 Introduction The overall objective with this project is to tackle the unemployment and lack of innovation due to a gap between labor market needs and skills of labor force. Changing conditions in the labor market must be better matched by a continued development of the competencies of the workforce and enhance the social inclusion of people into active work life. This could mean learning new and appropriate skills within a current work field, re- education into new profession, or providing transversal skills that enables easier career shifts. Therefore, activities within this project include work with university and national policies, focusing on organization and work with life long learning (LLL) approaches. LLL is directed to the increase of person's competence level overall; for example development of his/her general outlook, communication skills, language proficiency, ethical education, conducting negotiations, topical skills in any given area, and so on. LLL fills the gaps left off by formal education
    [Show full text]
  • 01 Sabic-El-Rayess.Indd
    6 EUROPEAN EDUCATION European Education, vol. 45, no. 2 (Summer 2013), pp. 6–27. © 2013 M.E. Sharpe, Inc. All rights reserved. Permissions: www.copyright.com ISSN 1056–4934 (print)/ISSN 1944–7086 (online) DOI: 10.2753/EUE1056-4934450201 AMR A SA BIC -EL-RA Y ess When Corruption Gets in the Way Befriending Diaspora and EU-nionizing Bosnia’s Higher Education This article investigates the encounter of EU-unionization with a domesticated practice of corruption in Bosnian higher education. Relying on primary data collected in Bosnia’s public higher education system, the study finds that the country’s corrupt higher education is in conflict with the Bologna-themed reforms that would arguably help harmonize Bosnia’s fragmented higher education. As it delineates factors that perpetuate corruption, the study, somewhat surprisingly, finds that the Bologna process—despite its partly failed adaptation in Bosnia—is still perceived as potentially transformative for the country’s corruption-prone higher education system. The study further looks into why that may be the case and explores a possibility of leveraging Bosnia’s intelligentsia abroad to lessen corruption in higher education. Appearing in various forms, educational corruption is often systemic and has a profound societal impact on developing countries. In line with Waite and Allen’s (2003) and Sayed and Bruce’s (1998a and 1998b) definitions of corruption, this analysis flexibly defines educational corruption as any abuse of official position that is pursued by an individual for either his/her benefit or that of his/her class or group. Corrupt behaviors have shaped the interaction between EU-nionizing1 forces and corrupt practices in Bosnia and Herzegovina’s higher education, but have generally remained out of researchers’ focus partly due to the phenomenon’s clandestine nature and risks associated with the topic’s pursuit in a politically fragile setting such as Bosnia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilateral Agreements and Worldwide Cooperation
    Published on Eurydice (https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice) Bilateral Agreements Bilateral cooperation between Albania and European and non-European countries in the field of education is coordinated and implemented by the Ministry of Education and Sport. It is defined in bilateral agreements, programmes and protocols on cooperation. MoES is responsible for operational implementation of bilateral scholarships in the field of higher education. These bilateral-multerial acts enable exchange of university teachers, students, scientists, experts, as well as direct cooperation of education institutions and language learning opportunities. Bilateral programmes of mobility in higher education are based on bilateral agreements and programmes involving scholarship exchange. Scholarships are awarded to students, teachers, scholars and researchers and fall under following categories: semester /partial studies; scholaships for undergraduate, graduate and PhD programmes; partial PhD studies; postdoctoral studies, research scholarships and research visits; scholarships for language summer courses. Promotion of Albanian language, literature and culture is one of Albanian policy priorities. MoES support learning Albanian language in Hungary, Germany, Switzerland, and Italy. Educational cooperation of primary and secondary schools encompasses cooperation with relevant ministries in other countries. Scholarships' exchange in the field of primary and secondary education refers to scholarships for professional training for teachers working in Albanian schools. Albanian culture and language classes abroad are intended for the children of Albanian citizens living abroad and for the children who live abroad but whose family language is Albanian. Albanian classes are open to other children who wish to learn Albanian language and about Albanian culture. The Ministry of Education and Sport organizes and finances Albanian pupils with Albanian books.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tempus Study
    A TEMPUS STUDY EN 10.2797/48753 Overview of the Higher Education Systems in the Tempus Partner Countries Eastern Europe Tempus Issue 11 ― November 2012 http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus Overview of the Higher Education Systems in the Tempus Partner Countries Eastern Europe This document has been produced within the framework of the European Union's Tempus programme, which is funded by the EuropeAid Development and Co-operation Directorate-General and the Directorate-General for Enlargement. It has been prepared by the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) on the basis of contributions from the Tempus Offices and the authorities concerned. The approach and data collection have been implemented in collaboration with Eurydice, the network on education systems and policies in Europe. Preface The Tempus programme, launched in 1990, is one of the longest standing EU-funded programmes in the field of education. During more than 20 years of its existence, Tempus has supported the modernisation of higher education in the Partner Countries outside the European Union, namely in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, the Western Balkans and in the Southern Mediterranean. In order to carry out Tempus projects with higher education institutions in the Tempus Partner Countries, the knowledge of the system in which the institutions operate is crucial for the success of project activities. The higher education systems of the Partners Countries operate in different contexts and have different historical backgrounds. For this reason, the definition of the needs and the objectives of the projects should be based on knowledge of the reality in the country concerned and should take into account the existing policies and legislative developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross- Sectoral Youth Assessment North Macedonia
    CROSS- SECTORAL YOUTH ASSESSMENT NORTH MACEDONIA Contract No: AID - 72016518Q00005 CROSS- SECTORAL YOUTH ASSESSMENT NORTH MACEDONIA Contract No: AID - 72016518Q00005 July, 2019 This publication was produced for the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Navanti Group. AID - 72016518Q00005. Prepared under the authorship of Laurie Zivetz Project management, Arber Kuci and Aleksandra Jovevska Gjorgjevikj National Survey, GaussPoll, Skopje Statistical analysis, Molly Inman Technical Analyst, Alex Zito Implemented by Navanti Group 2451 Crystal Drive, Suite 108 Arlington, VA 22202 In partnership with the National Youth Council of Macedonia. CROSS-SECTORAL YOUTH ASSESSMENT Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations, 7 Executive Summary, 9 I. Introduction, 13 II. Methodology, 15 III. Profile of respondents, 17 IV. What is known about youth migration out of North Macedonia?, 18 V. Education, 22 VI. Employment and entrepreneurship, 29 VII. Civic and political engagement, 35 VIII. Social issues and exclusion, 43 IX. A youth lens on USAID’s current portfolio, 49 X. Conclusions, 54 List of Tables and Figures Table 1 – Key Findings and Recommendations, 11 Table 2 - Number of respondents in the CSYA, 15 Table 3 – Employment status, 29 Table 4 - Strengthening youth responsiveness in USAID projects, 50 Figure 1 – Focus Group Discussions: Issue Mapping, 16 Figure 2 – Education: Highest level of education completed, 17 Figure 3 – Hollowing out of households in North Macedonia: Profile of households where a youth has migrated
    [Show full text]
  • Ismael Peña-López's Curriculum Vitae
    Ismael Peña-López Curriculum Vitae Ismael Peña-López Director General of Citizen Partcipation, Government of Catalonia CURRICULUM VITAE PERSONAL INFORMATION Director General of Citizen Partcipation Secretary of Transparency and Open Government Departament of Foreign Affairs, Institutional Relations and Transparency Government of Catalonia Tapineria, 10 08002 – Barcelona, Spain +34 661465901 Citizenship: Spanish [email protected] Date of birth: 19 March 1973 http://ictlogy.net @ictlogist Personal Information ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Research ...................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Publications ............................................................................................................................................................... 10 Reviewer .................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Teaching .................................................................................................................................................................... 29 Educational Innovation and production .................................................................................................................... 37 Science dissemination and knowledge
    [Show full text]
  • Currency List
    Currency List Tempus provides over 130 currencies to meet all of your international payment needs. MAJOR CURRENCIES AMERICAS ASIA SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA Aruba AWG Armenia AMD Angola AOA Australian Dollar AUD Bahamas BSD Bangladesh BDT Botswana BWP Barbados BBD Cambodia KHR Burundi BIF Canadian Dollar CAD Belize BZD China - Hong Kong CNH Cape Verde CVE Swiss Franc CHF Bermuda BMD China-Mainland CNY Cameroon, Chad, Bolivia BOB Georgia GEL Czech Koruna CZK Central African Republic, Brazil BRL India INR Congo, Equatorial Danish Krone DKK Cayman Islands KYD Indonesia IDR Guinea & Gabon XAF Euro EUR Chile CLP Kazakhstan KZT Kyrgyzstan KGS British Pound GBP Colombia COP Benin, Burkina Faso, Costa Rica CRC Laos LAK Guinea Bissau, Ivory Hong Kong Dollar HKD Dominican Republic DOP Malaysia MYR Coast, Mali, Niger, Hungarian Forint HUF East Caribbean XCD Mongolia MNT Senegal & Togo XOF Guatemala GTQ Nepal NPR Japanese Yen JPY Guyana GYD Pakistan PKR Comoros KMF Mexican Peso MXN Haiti HTG Philippines PHP DR Congo CDF Norwegian Krone NOK Honduras HNL Russia RUB Eritrea ERN Jamaica JMD South Korea KRW Ethiopia ETB New Zealand Dollar NZD Netherland Antilles ANG Sri Lanka LKR Gambia GMD Polish Zloty PLN Nicaragua NIO Taiwan TWD Ghana GHS Swedish Krona SEK Paraguay PYG Tajikistan TJS Guinea GNF Peru PEN Thailand THB Kenya KES Singapore Dollar SGD Suriname SRD Vietnam VND Lesotho LSL South African Rand ZAR Trinidad & Tobago TTD Liberia LRD United States Dollar USD Uruguay UYU MIDDLE EAST/ N. AFRICA Madagascar MGA Algeria DZD Malawi MWK OCEANIA Bahrain BHD Maldives
    [Show full text]
  • Azerbaijan: Country Digital Development Overview
    Country Diagnostics January 2019 Azerbaijan: Country Digital Development Overview Asian Development Bank This report was prepared by Seok Yoon, senior public management specialist (e-governance), Sustainable Development and Climate Change Department, and Michael Minges and Andre Kwitowski, consultants. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not represent the official views of ADB. Comments on the report can be emailed to Seok Yoon at [email protected]. ii CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 A. COUNTRY CONTEXT .......................................................................................................... 1 B. ADB COUNTRY STRATEGY PRIORITIES ............................................................................... 1 C. OBJECTIVE OF REPORT ..................................................................................................... 2 II. AZERBAIJAN E-READINESS ......................................................................................... 2 A. POLICY, REGULATORY, AND MARKET DIMENSIONS .............................................................. 2 B. ACCESS TO INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY ........................................... 5 1. FIXED TELEPHONES ......................................................................................................... 5 2. MOBILE PHONES .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]