Þ70 ·|}Þ89 ·|}Þ49
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Download This PDF File
A Political Ecology of Healing 1 Elisabeth Middleton University of California, Davis, USA. The concept of historical unresolved grief has powerful implications not only for healing from our past, but for giving us the strength and commitment to save ourselves and future generations. Maria Yellow Horse Brave Heart and Lemrya DeBruyn2 1. Introduction On June 29, 2004, the Pacific and Watershed Lands Stewardship Council convened a public meeting in Chester, California, in the northeastern Sierra Nevada mountains. The Board members and staff introduced the Council's purpose—to oversee the planning and divestiture of approximately 140,000 acres (56,656 ha.) of former Pacific Gas & Electric Company land around California—and then opened the floor to public comments and suggestions. One after another, representatives from Mountain Maidu groups including the Honey Lake Maidu, the Roundhouse Council Indian Education Center, and the Maidu Cultural and Development Group, and their allies, stood up and requested the formal inclusion of a Native American representative on the Stewardship Council Board. All of the lands to be divested, and, particularly for Maidu participants, much of the 53,185 acres (21,523 ha.) within the Feather River Planning Unit lie within the Mountain Maidu homeland. To not have an official representative of Native American interests on the Board to oversee the planning efforts for these lands seemed to indicate a blatant disregard for the historical and contemporary Native presence. In his 1998 review of political ecology, -
To the D.Irector of the Bureau of Land Management NM State Office April
To the D.irector of the Bureau of Land Management NM State Office April 28, 2019 BLM, NMSO SANTA FE RECEIVED BLM New Mexico State Office APR,;~,5o 2019 Attention: State Director PAID RECEIPT # _ 301 Dinosaur Trail Santa Fe, NM 87508 We are writing to ask you to stop the proposed lease sale of lands near Chaco Canyon slated for June 2019. Fossil fuel exploration on these sites is a threat to the people who live on the surrounding land and to Chaco Canyon, New Mexico's crown jewel and the ancestral home of Native Americans of the Southwest. Protection from oil and gas activity around Chaco Canyon is essential to protecting New Mexico's uhique history, environment and vital resources. Instead of continuing to develop fossil fuels on our public lands, we need to make a just transition to renewable energy to create ways to engage in environmentally sustainable, as well as culturally appropriate, economic development. We ask you to cancel the lease sale of parcels: NM-201906-012-24; 26-46; 48-51 and NM-201906-025 & 47 to protect Chaco Canyon and the Greater Chaco Region from oil and gas activities that could destroy this designated World Heritage Site, a landmark like no other on Earth. Attached: 11,962 requests for your attention to this matter. First Name Last Name City State Zip Code Daniel Helfman 6301 MAURY HOLW TX 78750-8257 Kenneth Ruby 18Tiffany Road NH 03079 Crystal Newcomer 2350 Dusty Ln PA 17025 Timothy Post 1120 PacificAve KS 66064 Marlena Lange 23 RoyceAve NY 10940-4708 Victoria Hamlin 3145 MaxwellAve CA 94619 L. -
Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES Lakesmart Program
Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES LakeSmart Program Only with YOUR help will New Hampshire’s lakes remain clean and healthy, now and in the future. The health of our lakes, and our enjoyment of these irreplaceable natural resources, is at risk. Polluted runoff water from the landscape is washing into our lakes, causing toxic algal blooms that make swimming in lakes unsafe. Failing septic systems and animal waste washed off the land are contributing bacteria to our lakes that can make people and pets who swim in the water sick. Toxic products used in the home, on lawns, and on roadways and driveways are also reaching our lakes, poisoning the water in some areas to the point where fish and other aquatic life cannot survive. NH LAKES has found that most property owners don’t know how their actions affect the health of lakes. We’ve also found that property owners want to do the right thing to help keep the lakes they enjoy clean and healthy and that they often need help of professional service providers like YOU! What is LakeSmart? The LakeSmart program is an education, evaluation, and recognition program that inspires property owners to live in a lake- friendly way, keeping our lakes clean and healthy. The program is free, voluntary, and non-regulatory. Through a confidential evaluation process, property owners receive tailored recommendations about how to implement lake-friendly living practices year-round in their home, on their property, and along and on the lake. Property owners have access to a directory of lake- friendly living service providers to help them adopt lake-friendly living practices. -
Volcanic Legacy
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacifi c Southwest Region VOLCANIC LEGACY March 2012 SCENIC BYWAY ALL AMERICAN ROAD Interpretive Plan For portions through Lassen National Forest, Lassen Volcanic National Park, Klamath Basin National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Tule Lake, Lava Beds National Monument and World War II Valor in the Pacific National Monument 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................4 Background Information ........................................................................................................................4 Management Opportunities ....................................................................................................................5 Planning Assumptions .............................................................................................................................6 BYWAY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................7 Management Goals ..................................................................................................................................7 Management Objectives ..........................................................................................................................7 Visitor Experience Goals ........................................................................................................................7 Visitor -
1991 Willowemoc Wild Forest Unit Management Plan
DEC Publication I WILLOWEMOC-LONGPOND WILD FOREST UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN October 1991 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation WILLOWEMOC - LONG POND WILD FOREST UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN OCTOBER, 1991 New York state Department of Environmental Conservation Mario Cuomo Thomas C. Jorling Governor Commissioner OCT O7 1991 TO: The Record FROM: Thomas C. RE: Unit Management Plan Willowemoc-Long Pond Wild Forest The Unit Management Plan for the Willowemoc-Long Pond Wild Forest has been completed. It is consistent with the guidelines and criteria of the Catskill Park State Land Master Plan involved citizen participation, is consistent with the State Constitution, the Environmental Conservation Law, rules, regulations and policy. The Plan includes management objectives for a five-year period and is hereby approved and adopted. cc: L. Marsh WILLOWEMOC - LONG POND WILD FOREST UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN PREFACE Unlike the more mountainous regions to the north and east which typify the Catskills, the Willowemoc - Long Pond Wild Forest is an area of subdued terrain with several ponds and a diversity of wetlands. Adding to the unique character of this unit is a network of wood roads providing both access and an opportunity for a variety of outdoor recreation. Having only recently acquired (1987/89) a nearly 4,000 acre portion of this unit where most of this network of wood roads exist, a primary focus of this management plan is to propose appropriate recreational use of this trail network. The following plan identifies the various resources, both natural and man-made, which make up the Willowemoc-Long Pond Wild Forest. It describes the historical and cultural influences which have shaped the character of the area. -
Pennsylvania Active Industrial Minerals Mining Permits - January 2015
Pennsylvania Active Industrial Minerals Mining Permits - January 2015 Primary Facility Kind County Municipality Mine Name Permit # Mailing Name Address1 Address2 City State Zip Code Telephone Bluestone General Permit Bradford Pike EDWARDS QUARRY 08112503 ANTHONY P BENNETT 3657 OLD STAGECOACH RD NULL WYALUSING PA 18853-8012 570-746-6015 Bluestone General Permit Bradford Stevens BILL JOHNSON GP-105 QUARRY 08122501 BILL JOHNSON 120 JOHNSON HILL LN NULL WYALUSING PA 18853-9759 570-746-2182 Bluestone General Permit Bradford Sheshequin BYERS 105 QUARRY 08122502 BISHOP BROS CONST CO INC PO BOX 289 NULL ULSTER PA 18850-0289 570-358-3655 Bluestone General Permit Bradford Rome COMSTOCK 105 QUARRY 08132501 BLACK KNIGHT QUARRIES INC. 293 BEACON LIGHT RD NULL TOWANDA PA 18848 570-265-8991 Bluestone General Permit Bradford Pike GOD III QUARRY 08122505 CHARLES H GOD II 46 RIVERWOODS LN NULL SUGAR RUN PA 18846-7857 570-721-0906 Bluestone General Permit Bradford Pike GOD II QUARRY 08122504 CHARLES H GOD II 46 RIVERWOODS LN NULL SUGAR RUN PA 18846-7857 570-721-0906 Bluestone General Permit Bradford Warren DEWEY QUARRY 08112502 JOHNSON QUARRIES INC PO BOX 136 NULL LE RAYSVILLE PA 18829-0136 570-744-1284 Bluestone General Permit Bradford Wyalusing CAMPTOWN QUARRY 08112501 MR DIRT INC 21186 RT 187 NULL TOWANDA PA 18848-9626 570-265-0857 Bluestone General Permit Bradford Wysox WYSOX PALMER QUARRY 08122503 NITTANY NOVA AGGREGATES LLC 2840 CLYMER AVE STE 400 NULL TELFORD PA 18969-1000 267-246-6176 Bluestone General Permit Bradford Asylum BEEBE QUARRY 08132502 -
Comanche Peak Units 3 and 4 COLA
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 3 & 4 COL Application Part 3 - Environmental Report CHAPTER 2 ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION............................................................................ 2.0-1 2.1 STATION LOCATION ................................................................................................. 2.1-1 2.1.1 REFERENCES..................................................................................................... 2.1-2 2.2 LAND........................................................................................................................... 2.2-1 2.2.1 THE SITE AND VICINITY .................................................................................... 2.2-1 2.2.1.1 The Site........................................................................................................... 2.2-1 2.2.1.2 The Vicinity...................................................................................................... 2.2-2 2.2.2 TRANSMISSION CORRIDORS AND OFF-SITE AREAS..................................... 2.2-5 2.2.3 THE REGION........................................................................................................ 2.2-6 2.2.4 REFERENCES:..................................................................................................... 2.2-7 2.3 WATER ...................................................................................................................... 2.3-1 2.3.1 HYDROLOGY ...................................................................................................... -
Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities
Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County -
Forest Wide Hazardous Tree Removal and Fuels Reduction Project
107°0'0"W VAIL k GYPSUM B e 6 u 6 N 1 k 2 k 1 h 2 e . e 6 . .1 I- 1 o 8 70 e c f 7 . r 0 e 2 2 §¨¦ e l 1 0 f 2 u 1 0 3 2 N 4 r r 0 1 e VailVail . 3 W . 8 . 1 85 3 Edwards 70 1 C 1 a C 1 .1 C 8 2 h N 1 G 7 . 7 0 m y 1 k r 8 §¨¦ l 2 m 1 e c . .E 9 . 6 z W A T m k 1 5 u C 0 .1 u 5 z i 6. e s 0 C i 1 B a -7 k s 3 2 .3 e e r I ee o C r a 1 F G Carterville h r e 9. 1 6 r g 1 N 9 g 8 r e 8 r y P e G o e u l Avon n C 9 N C r e n 5 ch w i r 8 .k2 0 N n D k 1 n 70 a tt e 9 6 6 8 G . c 7 o h 18 1 §¨¦ r I-7 o ra West Vail .1 1 y 4 u h 0 1 0. n lc 7 l D .W N T 7 39 . 71 . 1 a u 1 ch W C k 0 C d . 2 e . r e 1 e 1 C st G e e . r 7 A Red Hill R 3 9 k n s e 5 6 7 a t 2 . -
Geographic Names
GEOGRAPHIC NAMES CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES ? REVISED TO JANUARY, 1911 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 PREPARED FOR USE IN THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOGRAPHIC BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C, JANUARY, 1911 ) CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. The following list of geographic names includes all decisions on spelling rendered by the United States Geographic Board to and including December 7, 1910. Adopted forms are shown by bold-face type, rejected forms by italic, and revisions of previous decisions by an asterisk (*). Aalplaus ; see Alplaus. Acoma; township, McLeod County, Minn. Abagadasset; point, Kennebec River, Saga- (Not Aconia.) dahoc County, Me. (Not Abagadusset. AQores ; see Azores. Abatan; river, southwest part of Bohol, Acquasco; see Aquaseo. discharging into Maribojoc Bay. (Not Acquia; see Aquia. Abalan nor Abalon.) Acworth; railroad station and town, Cobb Aberjona; river, IVIiddlesex County, Mass. County, Ga. (Not Ackworth.) (Not Abbajona.) Adam; island, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester Abino; point, in Canada, near east end of County, Md. (Not Adam's nor Adams.) Lake Erie. (Not Abineau nor Albino.) Adams; creek, Chatham County, Ga. (Not Aboite; railroad station, Allen County, Adams's.) Ind. (Not Aboit.) Adams; township. Warren County, Ind. AJjoo-shehr ; see Bushire. (Not J. Q. Adams.) Abookeer; AhouJcir; see Abukir. Adam's Creek; see Cunningham. Ahou Hamad; see Abu Hamed. Adams Fall; ledge in New Haven Harbor, Fall.) Abram ; creek in Grant and Mineral Coun- Conn. (Not Adam's ties, W. Va. (Not Abraham.) Adel; see Somali. Abram; see Shimmo. Adelina; town, Calvert County, Md. (Not Abruad ; see Riad. Adalina.) Absaroka; range of mountains in and near Aderhold; ferry over Chattahoochee River, Yellowstone National Park. -
Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections. -
Town of Harpswell Open Space Plan
Town of Harpswell Open Space Plan March 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................i Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................ii 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................1 2. What is Open Space and Why is it Valuable?..................................................................2 2A. Definition of Open Space ...................................................................................................... 2 2B. A Vision for Open Space in Harpswell ................................................................................ 6 3. What is the Open Space Plan? .........................................................................................7 3A. Description of the Plan.......................................................................................................... 7 3B. The Plan’s Development Process.......................................................................................... 8 4.Assessing Harpswell’s Open Space.................................................................................10 4A. Topography of Harpswell................................................................................................... 10 4B. History and Accomplishments 1987 – 2008......................................................................