NEWS , ANALYSIS , OPINION FOR THE PSYCHOANALYTIC COMMUNITY ISSUE 21 SUMMER 2016 Brexit, The interpretive Where does Publicising project fear, laboratory psychotherapy our 3 and the other come from? profession 8 16need, conflict, trauma, disadvantage and 22arguments in favour of the importance distress. Good services tried to function of preserving ‘deep’ rather than ‘shallow’ as ‘containers’ for whatever came their welfare, and an evolution of purposes What’s our way, and through attentive, containing that was internally driven by service responses, to offer hope of alleviation user and professional experience rather from conflict, distress and need. The than only externally cultivated through book was well aware of how frequently the instruments of an efficiency-seeking state of inadequately this ambition was realised, and cost-conscious state bureaucracy. But but the analysis of these deficits had not why engage in an argument unless you moved much beyond the premises of believe someone is listening? Even in 2005 Menzies Lyth’s theory of social systems both of us were too long in the tooth to mind? as a defence against anxiety. Chapter 3 of consciously suppose that the book would BW, ‘The State of Mind We’re In’, was ‘change the world’, but unconsciously searching for a new way of articulating perhaps we did assume that we were By Andrew Cooper and Julian Lousada the intersection between task related intervening in a world where promoting defences and the pervasive impact of the rational debate about irrational and new audit, performance inspection and destructive forces and developments was a N 17 JUNE we convened a We started writing Borderline Welfare regulation regimes which were a central cogent thing to do – as though somewhere, one-day seminar to revisit around 2002 when the Blairite project feature of the Blairite ‘modernisation’ a sane and thoughtful parent was alive the arguments and thinking was in full swing, and its impact on our project. and potentially available to see sense. We of our book Borderline public sector, mental health services, think we no longer believe this. WelfareO, published in 2005. A week later and indeed everything we know (or is ‘They know exactly what…’ ‘Are we still living we all awoke to the news that Britain had it ‘knew’?) as the British welfare state voted to leave the EU, precipitating what was manifest as both a political project in a Borderline Our own stance resonates with Ken many have called the greatest political and as a lived experience. It was the Welfare world?’ Loach’s comment on his new film I, crisis in the UK since at least the second connection between the two – how it felt Daniel Blake: and what it meant day to day to be a part world war. Our economic and political In using the term Borderline Welfare we of this transformation, and the political It is not an accident that the poor are future now feels, at best, profoundly sought to describe a systemic oscillation forces and visions driving and shaping punished for their unemployment. uncertain. Given the manifest national between the fear of dependency on the the project – that was a central theme of That’s their project, that’s the point, anxiety of the days immediately following one hand and a sense of purposelessness the book’s methodology and argument. that’s what has to happen because the vote, the rapidly engineered and loneliness on the other. We argued We say the impact was ‘manifest’, but their model of society produces coronation of a new Prime Minister has that that borderline welfare is rooted in that is not quite the same as saying we unemployment and if people question generated a strange sense of superficial a breakdown of the capacity to tolerate ‘understood’ it. Indeed, the writing of the that model then they are lost… calm on the one hand, and a deeply ‘unreasonable’ emotional experience, a book was in part an effort to achieve such There’s no point in showing the film troubling suspicion of national illusion fear of complexity which leads to a loss understanding. to them. and somnolence on the other. We have of the capacity for creative thinking and been provided with what we all crave in action that flows from holding onto and Ten years after its publication we are There is no point because ‘they’ are circumstances of group existential anxiety reflecting upon emotional experience. – a seemingly ‘strong leader’. struck by the fact that Borderline Welfare simply not interested in ‘evidence’ of seems to have a continuing relevance in the destructive consequences of their However, we think our underlying belief people’s minds and thinking. It is still It is far too early to say what impact all state was that it would be worth mounting Continues on page 4 this will have on the direction of travel frequently cited, quoted and referenced, of our health and welfare systems in the and from time to time we encounter UK, but notwithstanding Theresa May’s people who regard it is something of a protestations on behalf of the interests touchstone text. But the times have moved of the whole population, the likelihood on, and we wonder whether the book’s is that our deep social inequalities will main arguments and descriptive premises persist, the NHS will remain underfunded are still valid. Or have new forces, and and vulnerable to privatisation, and lived realities and experiences shaped by statutory mental health and social care these forces, entered the picture? Are we services will continue functioning in crisis still living in a Borderline Welfare world, mode. only more so, or are we inhabiting and by virtue of our daily activity sustaining (or In a recent essay called Hope is an sometimes resisting) a different kind of Embrace of the Unknown, Rebecca Solnit organisational and social order than the says: one we tried to describe? It is important to say what hope is not: it is not the belief that everything was, So, what were the main features of the is, or will be fine. The evidence is all welfare environment we described and around us of tremendous suffering and conceptualised in 2005? destruction. The hope I am interested in is about broad perspectives with No contest any more? specific possibilities, ones that invite or First, we believe we thought we were demand we act. It is also not a sunny in a struggle, a contest over something, everything-is-getting-better narrative, perhaps best described as ‘the possibility though it may be a counter to the of meaningful mental health and social everything-is-getting-worse one. You welfare activity’. Our assumption was could call it an account of complexities that the postwar health and welfare and uncertainties, with openings. settlement was predicated on an idea of social and professional responsiveness to NA 21 Summer 2016.indd 1 8/8/16 17:55:53 NEW ASSOCIATIONS ISSUE 21 SUMMER 2 0 1 6 2 and there is possibly some truth in that evidence base in the upcoming BPC Editorial stereotype. seminar series, outlined in the article by Ann Scott and Jessica Yakeley. It is easy to understand why many in our profession who work in the public Yet some in our profession remain sector have become disillusioned with suspicious and unconvinced of the merits what has been two decades of increasing of being able to demonstrate that what we Now is managerial (often perceived as ‘right do actually works. Peter Fonagy, perhaps wing’), target driven approaches to our profession’s most prominent advocate service delivery. As Cooper and Lousada for the need for evidence, illuminatingly argue, the profession feels under attack comments how he continues ‘to be the time and wants to mount arguments in surprised by the coexistence of the favour of the importance of ‘preserving inspired thinking of psychoanalysts with “deep” rather than “shallow” welfare… the institutional neglect by psychoanalytic By Gary Fereday driven by service user and professional organisations of scientific activity that experience rather than only externally might ensure the long-term survival of cultivated through the instruments of an our treasured insights into the human efficiency-seeking and cost-conscious state mind.’ HAT WE ARE LIVING BPC’s Future Strategy Working Group bureaucracy.’ through some of the most articulates, while our profession has We need to talk about the evidence, so extraordinary political become ‘adept at keeping our patients’ ‘Little did let’s debate how good the evidence really times since the Second confessions private, we often apply that is and whether more needs to be done, TWorld War is an understatement. When very same sense of protectiveness and we know and let’s discuss how our profession feels we planned this extended 21st edition of silence to all aspects of our working lives, beleaguered in the public sector and New Associations, little did we know that and consequently, we fail to speak with the political debate what we can do to change this. the political and constitutional landscape the general public as fully as we might, landscape would But from that debate we need to build of the United Kingdom and Europe would often to our detriment.’ a confident voice that can speak to the be undergoing so much anxiety and be undergoing public, to politicians, and to policy makers change. Meanwhile across the Atlantic we We need to find our collective voice. But so much change.’ of all political persuasions in a way that are witnessing an equally extraordinary care must be exercised when we find that they hear what we have to say. campaign for the White House. voice to ensure it is heard.