Topical Study of Lead-Zinc Gossans by WILLIAM C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Topical Study of Lead-Zinc Gossans by WILLIAM C BULLETIN 46 Topical Study of Lead-Zinc Gossans by WILLIAM C. KELLY Field and laboratory studies of lead-zinc ore outcrops, mineralogy of gossan limonite, outcrop colors and porosity, with a discussion of nonsulfide boxwork structures 1 9 5 8 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS STATION SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Alvin J. Thompson, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS Ex OFFICIO The Honorable Edwin L. Mechem .................. Governor of New Mexico Mrs. Georgia L. Lusk ......................... Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS Robert W. Botts ................................................................ Albuquerque Holm 0. Bursum, Jr. .................................................................. Socorro Thomas M. Cramer ................................................................... Carlsbad John N. Mathews, Jr. ................................................................. Socorro Richard A. Matuszeski ...................................................... Albuquerque Contents Page ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 3 Background, scope, and purpose ............................................................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................. 5 MINERALOGY OF LIMONITE IN LEAD-ZINC GOSSANS. ......... 6 General remarks ............................................................................................ 6 Equipment and procedure .......................................................................... 8 Results of thermal analyses of gossan limonites ...................................... 9 Predominance of goethite in lead-zinc gossans .................................... 14 Possible application of thermal analysis to copper gossans ................. 15 INTERPRETATION OF BOXWORK STRUCTURES ..................... 16 General remarks ......................................................................................... 16 Examples of nonsulfide boxworks ......................................................... 16 Copperside mine, Goodsprings, Nevada ............................................ 16 New Mayberry mine, Utah .................................................................... 17 Hidden Treasure mine, Ophir Hill area, Utah ................................... 17 Lark vein, Bingham district, Utah ........................................................ 18 Boxwork siderite ..................................................................................... 20 A case history in boxwork interpretation .............................................. 21 Chemistry of formation of supergene limonite and siderite box- works after limestone ............................................................................. 23 Problems involved .................................................................................. 23 Deposition of limonite or siderite ........................................................ 24 Leaching of the carbonate matrix ........................................................ 30 GOSSAN POROSITY .................................................................................. 32 General remarks ......................................................................................... 32 A case study of porosity at the Shingle Canyon mine, New Mexico 33 Sulfide estimates by ordinary porosity determinations ........................ 36 Application of microscopic counts to the measurement of gossan voids .......................................................................................................... 38 Limitations of the microscopic method ................................................. 41 Page OUTCROP COLORS AS GUIDES TO LEAD AND ZINC ORE 42 Previous studies ....................................................................................... 42 Present studies .......................................................................................... 43 Procedure ............................................................................................. 43 Colors associated with sphalerite ......................................................... 45 Colors associated with galena .............................................................. 45 Colors associated with pyrite ............................................................... 46 Colors of transported oxides ................................................................ 47 Concluding statement ............................................................................... 47 APPENDIX A ............................................................................................... 48 Features of oxidation in areas visited for sampling ................................... 48 Pewabic mine, Hanover, New Mexico ................................................ 48 Grant County mine, New Mexico ........................................................ 50 Bullfrog mine, Vanadium, New Mexico .............................................. 51 Anita mine, New Mexico ..................................................................... 52 Providencia mine, Mexico ................................................................... 53 Hidden Treasure mine, Utah ................................................................ 54 Bingham district, Utah ......................................................................... 56 Utah Copper Co. pit ............................................................................. 56 Lark vein .............................................................................................. 58 East Tennessee zinc district ................................................................. 59 Other sample sources ........................................................................... 60 APPENDIX B ............................................................................................... 63 Construction of the Eh-pH diagram for the system Fe-H2O-CO2-S at 25°C ........................................................................ 63 APPENDIX C ............................................................................................... 66 Method used for the determination of the porosity values (primary-ore samples) listed in Table 3 ............................................... 66 APPENDIX D ............................................................................................... 68 Calculation of volumetric percentages of sulfides in Shingle Can- yon ore samples from assay returns ..................................................... 68 APPENDIX E ............................................................................................... 69 X-ray diffraction data on gossan goethites ............................................... 69 REFERENCES ............................................................................................. 75 INDEX ......................................................................................................... 79 iv Illustrations TABLES Page 1. Gossan limonite samples tested by thermal analysis .................. 11 2. Reactions and equilibrium formulae for the system Fe-H2O-CO2-S in the oxide zone .................................................. 27 3. Sulfide estimates by gossan porosity determinations .................. 37 4. Outcrop colors ................................................................................. 44 5. Standard free energies of formation .............................................. 64 FIGURES 1. Standard differential thermal curves of the natural hydrous ferric oxides ......................................................................................... 7 2. Differential thermal curves (representative of 112 analyses) of gossan limonites ............................................................................... 10 3. Thermal curves of goethite mixtures .......................................... 13 4. Boxwork after limestone, Hidden Treasure mine, Utah ......... 19 5. Eh-pH diagram for the system Fe-H2O-0O2-S in the oxide zone 25 6. Variation of the siderite stability field with dissolved-CO2 concentration .................................................................................... 29 7. Oxidation subsidence, Shingle Canyon, New Mexico ............. 35 8. Microscopic estimates of sulfide volumes, Shingle Canyon, New Mexico ................................................................................................ 40 9. Zinc gossan of the Hanover mine, New Mexico ..................... 49 10. Perspective of the Hidden Treasure mine, Ophir Hill area, Utah .................................................................................................... 55 11. Pattern of oxidation in the Utah copper pit, Bingham, Utah .. 57 12. Pinnacle-saddle pattern of oxidation, Grasselli mine, east Tennessee .......................................................................................... 61 PLATES 1. Electron photomicrographs of goethite ..................... Following 78 2. Limonite boxworks ................................................................. " " 3. Limonite and smithsonite structures .................................... " " 4. Boxworks .................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Microstructural, Mechanical, Corrosion and Cytotoxicity Characterization of Porous Ti-Si Alloys with Pore-Forming Agent
    materials Article Microstructural, Mechanical, Corrosion and Cytotoxicity Characterization of Porous Ti-Si Alloys with Pore-Forming Agent Andrea Školáková 1,*, Jana Körberová 1 , Jaroslav Málek 2 , Dana Rohanová 3, Eva Jablonská 4, Jan Pinc 1, Pavel Salvetr 1 , Eva Gregorová 3 and Pavel Novák 1 1 Department of Metals and Corrosion Engineering, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic; [email protected] (J.K.); [email protected] (J.P.); [email protected] (P.S.); [email protected] (P.N.) 2 UJP Praha a.s., Nad Kamínkou 1345, 156 10 Prague 16, Czech Republic; [email protected] 3 Department of Glass and Ceramics, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic; [email protected] (D.R.); [email protected] (E.G.) 4 Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +420-220-444-055 Received: 12 November 2020; Accepted: 7 December 2020; Published: 9 December 2020 Abstract: Titanium and its alloys belong to the group of materials used in implantology due to their biocompatibility, outstanding corrosion resistance and good mechanical properties. However, the value of Young’s modulus is too high in comparison with the human bone, which could result in the failure of implants. This problem can be overcome by creating pores in the materials, which, moreover, improves the osseointegration. Therefore, TiSi2 and TiSi2 with 20 wt.% of the pore-forming agent (PA) were prepared by reactive sintering and compared with pure titanium and titanium with the addition of various PA content in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental and Computational Study of Fracturing in an Anisotropic Brittle Solid
    Mechanics of Materials 28Ž. 1998 247±262 Experimental and computational study of fracturing in an anisotropic brittle solid Abbas Azhdari 1, Sia Nemat-Nasser ) Center of Excellence for AdÕanced Materials, Department of Applied Mechanics and Engineering Sciences, UniÕersity of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0416, USA Received 21 November 1996; revised 26 August 1997 Abstract For isotropic materials, stress- and energy-based fracture criteria lead to fairly similar results. Theoretical studies show that the crack-path predictions made by these criteria are not identical in the presence of strong material anisotropy. Therefore, experiments are performed to ascertain which criterion may apply to anisotropic materials. Notched specimens made from sapphire, a microscopically homogeneous and brittle solid, are used for the experiments. An attempt is made to locate the notch on different crystallographic planes and thus to examine the fracture path along different cleavage planes. The experimental observations are compared with the numerical results of the maximum tensile stress and the maximum energy-release rate criteria. It is observed that most of the notched specimens are fractured where the tensile stress is maximum, whereas the energy criterion fails to predict the fracture path of most of the specimens. For the tensile-stress Žn. s p s r g s fracture criterion, a dimensionless parameter, A ''2 R0 nn a Enn, is introduced, where nnand E nn, respectively, are the tensile stress and Young's modulus in the direction normal to the cleavage plane specified by the angle a Žthe fracture surface energy of this plane is ga . and R0 is a characteristic length, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity 21: Cleavage and Fracture Maine Geological Survey
    Activity 21: Cleavage and Fracture Maine Geological Survey Objectives: Students will recognize the difference between cleavage and fracture; they will become familiar with planes of cleavage, and will use a mineral's "habit of breaking" as an aid to identifying common minerals. Time: This activity is intended to take one-half (1/2) period to discuss cleavage planes and types and one (1) class period to do the activity. Background: Cleavage is the property of a mineral that allows it to break smoothly along specific internal planes (called cleavage planes) when the mineral is struck sharply with a hammer. Fracture is the property of a mineral breaking in a more or less random pattern with no smooth planar surfaces. Since nearly all minerals have an orderly atomic structure, individual mineral grains have internal axes of length, width, and depth, related to the consistent arrangement of the atoms. These axes are reflected in the crystalline pattern in which the mineral grows and are present in the mineral regardless of whether or not the sample shows external crystal faces. The axes' arrangement, size, and the angles at which these axes intersect, all help determine, along with the strength of the molecular bonding in the given mineral, the degree of cleavage the mineral will exhibit. Many minerals, when struck sharply with a hammer, will break smoothly along one or more of these planes. The degree of smoothness of the broken surface and the number of planes along which the mineral breaks are used to describe the cleavage. The possibilities include the following. Number of Planes Degree of Smoothness One Two Three Perfect Good Poor Thus a mineral's cleavage may be described as perfect three plane cleavage, in which case the mineral breaks with almost mirror-like surfaces along the three dimensional axes; the mineral calcite exhibits such cleavage.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation of Chrysocolla and Secondary Copper Phosphates in the Highly Weathered Supergene Zones of Some Australian Deposits
    Records of the Australian Museum (2001) Vol. 53: 49–56. ISSN 0067-1975 Formation of Chrysocolla and Secondary Copper Phosphates in the Highly Weathered Supergene Zones of Some Australian Deposits MARTIN J. CRANE, JAMES L. SHARPE AND PETER A. WILLIAMS School of Science, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC NSW 1797, Australia [email protected] (corresponding author) ABSTRACT. Intense weathering of copper orebodies in New South Wales and Queensland, Australia has produced an unusual suite of secondary copper minerals comprising chrysocolla, azurite, malachite and the phosphates libethenite and pseudomalachite. The phosphates persist in outcrop and show a marked zoning with libethenite confined to near-surface areas. Abundant chrysocolla is also found in these environments, but never replaces the two secondary phosphates or azurite. This leads to unusual assemblages of secondary copper minerals, that can, however, be explained by equilibrium models. Data from the literature are used to develop a comprehensive geochemical model that describes for the first time the origin and geochemical setting of this style of economically important mineralization. CRANE, MARTIN J., JAMES L. SHARPE & PETER A. WILLIAMS, 2001. Formation of chrysocolla and secondary copper phosphates in the highly weathered supergene zones of some Australian deposits. Records of the Australian Museum 53(1): 49–56. Recent exploitation of oxide copper resources in Australia these deposits are characterized by an abundance of the has enabled us to examine supergene mineral distributions secondary copper phosphates libethenite and pseudo- in several orebodies that have been subjected to intense malachite associated with smaller amounts of cornetite and weathering.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlation of the Mohs's Scale of Hardness with the Vickers' S Hardness Numbers
    718 Correlation of the Mohs's scale of hardness with the Vickers' s hardness numbers. By E. WILFRED TAYLOR, C.B.E., F.R.M.S., F. Inst. P. Messrs. Cooke, Troughton & Simms, Ltd., York. [Read June 23, 1949.] INERALOGISTS have long been accustomed to describe hard- M ness with the aid of a scale devised by Friedrich Mohs, who lived from 1773 to 1839. The test is qualitative, each mineral in the scale being capable of scratching those that precede it, but the ten minerals have held their ground as a useful representative series with which it is now interesting to compare another method of estimating hard- ness. In the metallurgical world hardness is now usually expressed by means of the Vickers's hardness numbers or their equivalent, and the figures are derived from the size of the impression made by a diamond indenter in the form of a four-sided pyramid with the opposite faces worked to an included angle of 136 ~ More recently micro-hardness testers have been devised to enable minute impressions to be formed under light loads on small individual crystals of a metallic alloy, 1 and it occurred to the author to obtain hardness figures for the various types of optical glass by means of a scratch test with such an instrument. The intention was to draw a lightly loaded diamond across a polished glass surface and to measure the width of the resulting furrow. This method proved to be promising, but as an experiment a static indenter was also used, and it was dis- covered that glass was sufficiently plastic to take good impressions, so long as the load did not exceed 50 grams or thereabouts.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Beryl Deposits of the Peerless Pegmatite Pennington County South Dakota
    Geology and Beryl Deposits of the Peerless Pegmatite Pennington County South Dakota GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 297-A This report concerns work done partly on behalj of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission and is published with the permission of the , » Commission Geology and Beryl Deposits of the Peerless Pegmatite Pennington County South Dakota By DOUGLAS M. SHERllDAN, HAL G. STEPHENS, MORTIMER H. STAATZ and JAMES J. NORTON PEGMATITES AND OTHER PRECAMBRIAN ROCKS IN THE SOUTHERN BLACK HILLS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 297-A This report concerns work done partly on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission and is published with the permission of the Commission UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1957 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $1.50 (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Page Abstract.__________________________________________ 1 Geology Continued Introduction _______________________________________ 1 Peerless pegmatite Continued Location_____________________________________ 1 Chemical composition......____________ 17 History and production________________________ 2 Origin________ ____________________ _. 18 Past and present investigations.__________________ 3 Mineral deposits_____________________________ 21 Acknowledgments__________________________ 4 Mica__ _________ _________________________ 21 Mine workings _____________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Identification Chart – LECTURE
    Mineral Identification Chart – LECTURE NONMETALLIC MINERALS (listed in decreasing hardness) Review mineral formula to connect to family! H=Hardness; SG = specific gravity Mineral H SG Streak Color (and/or luster) Form Cleavage/Fracture Distinctive properties Garnet 7 3.5- White Red, black, or brown; can Dodecahedrons (12- No cleavage. Dodecahedron form, X3Y2(SiO4)3 where X and Y are 4.3 be yellow, green, pink. sided polygons) Brittle. Conchoidal red, glassy, conchoidal combinations of Ca, Mg, Fe, Al Glassy. Translucent. fracture. fracture, H=7. Olivine (Mg,Fe)2SiO4 7 3.3- White Pale or dark olive green Short prisms Conchoidal Green, conchoidal 3.4 to yellow or brown. (usually too small to fracture. fracture, glassy, H=7. Glassy. Transparent. see). Brittle. Usually granular. Quartz SiO2 7 2.7 White Colorless, white, or gray; Massive; or Conchoidal Glassy, conchoidal can occur in all colors. hexagonal prisms fracture. fracture, H=7. Hex. Glassy and/or greasy. that end in a point. prism with point end. Plagioclase Feldspar family: 6 2.6- White Colorless, white, gray, or Tabular crystals or 2 good cleavage Twinning. 2 cleavages Anorthite and Labradorite 2.8 black; can have iridescent thin needles planes at nearly at 90°. CaAl2Si2O8 to Oligoclase and play of color from within. right angles. Albite NaAlSi3O8 Translucent to opaque. Potassium Feldspar family: 6 2.5- White Pink. Or white, orange, Tabular crystals 2 good cleavage Subparallel exsolution Orthoclase and Microcline 2.6 brown, gray, green. planes at nearly lamellae. 2 cleavages KAlSi3O8 Translucent to opaque. right angles. at 90°. Pink color. Pyroxene family: Augite 5.5- 3.2- White, Green to black; opaque.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods Used to Identifying Minerals
    METHODS USED TO IDENTIFYING MINERALS More than 4,000 minerals are known to man, and they are identified by their physical and chemical properties. The physical properties of minerals are determined by the atomic structure and crystal chemistry of the minerals. The most common physical properties are crystal form, color, hardness, cleavage, and specific gravity. CRYSTALS One of the best ways to identify a mineral is by examining its crystal form (external shape). A crystal is defined as a homogenous solid possessing a three-dimensional internal order defined by the lattice structure. Crystals developed under favorable conditions often exhibit characteristic geometric forms (which are outward expressions of the internal arrangements of atoms), crystal class, and cleavage. Large, well- developed crystals are not common because of unfavorable growth conditions, but small crystals recognizable with a hand lens or microscope are common. Minerals that show no external crystal form but possess an internal crystalline structure are said to be massive. A few minerals, such as limonite and opal, have no orderly arrangement of atoms and are said to be amorphous. Crystals are divided into six major classes based on their geometric form: isometric, tetragonal, hexagonal, orthorhombic, monoclinic, and triclinic. The hexagonal system also has a rhombohedral subdivision, which applies mainly to carbonates. CLEAVAGE AND FRACTURE After minerals are formed, they have a tendency to split or break along definite planes of weakness. This property is called cleavage. These planes of weakness are closely related to the internal structure of the mineral, and are usually, but not always, parallel to crystal faces or possible crystal faces.
    [Show full text]
  • Characters Depending Upon Cohesion and Elasticity of Minerals
    186 PHYSICAL MINERALOGY Thus, although it will be shown that the optical characters of crystals are in agreement in general with the symmetry of their form, they do not show all the variations in this symmetry. It is true, for example, that all directions are optically similar in a crystal belonging to any class under the isometric system; but this is obviously not true of its molecular cohesion, as may be shown by the cleavage. Again, all directions in a tetragonal crystal at right angles to the vertical axis are optically similar; but this again is not true of the cohesion. These points are further elucidated under the description of the special characters of each group. I. CHARACTERS DEPENDING UPON COHESION AND ELASTICITY 276. Cohesion, Elasticity. - The name cohesion is given to the force of attraction existing between the molecules of one and the.same body, in con- sequence of which they offer resistance to any influence tending to separate them, as in the breaking of a solid body or the scratching of its surface. Elasticity is the force which tends to restore the molecules of a body back into their original position, from which they have been disturbed, as when a body has suffered change of shape or of volume under pressure. The varying degrees of cohesion and elasticity for crystals of different minerals, or for different directions in the same crystal, are shown in the prominent characters: cleavage, fracture, tenacity, hardness; also in the gliding-planes, percussion-figures or pressure-figures, and the etching-figures. 277. Cleavage. - Cleavage is the tendency of a crystallized mineral to break in certain definite directions, yielding more or less smooth surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Gossans and Leached Cappings
    Gossans and Leached Cappings Roger Taylor Gossans and Leached Cappings Field Assessment Roger Taylor Townsville Queensland 4810 Australia [email protected] ISBN 978-3-642-22050-0 e-ISBN 978-3-642-22051-7 DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-22051-7 Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2011934477 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Typesetting & Prepress: Elisabeth Sillmann, Landau, www.blaetterwaldDesign.de Cover design: deblik, Berlin Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Acknowledgements iven a 30–40 years germination period, it is not surprising that the list of con- tributors is considerable, and it is not feasible to list the input of every student, G colleague, and professional geologist. Th ank you everybody.
    [Show full text]
  • Beryl Be3al2si6o18 C 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Hexagonal
    Beryl Be3Al2Si6O18 c 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Hexagonal. Point Group: 6=m 2=m 2=m: Crystals prismatic to tabular, with 1010 , 0001 , and 1120 ; may be complexly terminated by pyramids, to 18 m and 180 t. Also rfadial,gtrfapichge, columf nar;ggranular to compact. Twinning: On hkil forms, rarely. f g Physical Properties: Cleavage: Imperfect on 0001 . Fracture: Conchoidal to uneven. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 7.5{8 VHN = 119f0{145g0, 1300 average. D(meas.) = 2.63{2.97 increasing with alkali content; 2.7 average. D(calc.) = 2.640 Optical Properties: Transparent to translucent. Color: Colorless, white, pale blue to sky-blue, bluish green through green to greenish yellow or yellow, rose to peach, deep pink to raspberry-red; may be zoned; commonly colorless in thin section. Streak: White. Luster: Vitreous, resinous. Optical Class: Uniaxial ({). Pleochroism: Weak to distinct; O = colorless, yellowish green, light blue, yellowish red; E = sea-green, blue, purplish red. ! = 1.567{1.610 ² = 1.565{1.599; increasing with alkali content. Cell Data: Space Group: P 6=mcc: a = 9.205{9.274 c = 9.187{9.249 Z = 2 X-ray Powder Pattern: Royalston, Massachusetts, USA. 2.867 (100), 3.254 (95), 7.98 (90), 4.60 (50), 3.99 (45), 3.015 (35), 2.523 (30) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3) SiO2 65.59 63.29 67.07 Na2O 0.26 1.23 Al2O3 18.25 17.76 18.97 Cs2O 3.79 FeO 1.16 Rb2O 0.05 BeO 13.46 10.79 13.96 LOI 0.70 1.10 Li2O 1.30 Total 99.42 99.31 100.00 (1) Mursinka, Russia; by electron microprobe.
    [Show full text]
  • Deposits of Manganese Ore in Arizona
    DEPOSITS OF MANGANESE ORE IN ARIZONA. By E. L. JONES, Jr., and F. L. RANSOME. INTRODUCTION. By E. L. JONES, Jr. FIELD WORK. Deposits of manganese ore have long been known in some of the old mining districts of Arizona, notably in the Bisbee, Tombstone, Globe, and Patagonia districts, but prior to 1915 the ore had not been mined except as it formed the gangue of silver ores and was needed as a flux for use in local smelters. Manganese ore as such was first shipped from the Tombstone district in 1915, and from the Globe and Bisbee districts in 1916. The high prices that were offered, for manganese ore in 1916, 1917, and 1918, and the fact that the opening of the new deposits would render the Government patriotic service greatly stimulated the production of the ore and the search' for new deposits. As a result of this search discoveries in many parts of the State have been reported to Government bureaus from time to time. In order to obtain information concerning these newly discovered deposits, their character and grade of ore, ore reserves, and pro­ ductive capacity, two geologists of the United States Geological Survey examined manganese deposits in Arizona, E. L. Jones, jr., visiting many scattered deposits throughout the State, > and F. L. Ransome those of the Bisbee and Tombstone districts. The work of Mr. Jones was done in August and September, 1917, and in April, May, and June, 1918. It was geologic reconnaissance work, and generally not more than a few hours could be devoted to the examination of each deposit.
    [Show full text]