DOCSLIB.ORG

Liste Des Principaux Champignons De La Région De Montréal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Liste Des Principaux Champignons De La Région De Montréal Liste des principaux champignons o Lundis Date: _____________________ Nombre de personnes: _______ de la région de Montréal o Excursions Lieu: __________________________________________ 1 Myxomycètes O Cudonia circinans O Microglossum viride O Sphaerosporella brunnea O Cinereomyces lindbladii O Phlebia radiata O Bankera violascens O Ramaria fumigata O Sarcomyxa serotina O Ampulloclitocybe clavipes O Pseudoclitocybe cyathiformis O Cudonia lutea O Microstoma floccosum O Tapesia fusca O Climacocystis borealis O Phlebia rufa O Climacodon septentrionalis O Ramaria gracilis O Tectella operculata O Armillaria mellea O Pseudoomphalina pachyphylla O Arcyria cinerea O Cudoniella clavus O Mitrophora semilibera O Tarzetta bronca O Coltricia cinnamomea O Phlebia tremellosa O Hericium americanum O Ramaria lutea O Armillaria ostoyae O Rugosomyces carneus O Arcyria denudata 9 Hygrophores O Daldinia childiae O Mitrula elegans O Tarzetta catinus O Coltricia montagnei var. montagneiO Piptoporus betulinus O Hericium coralloides O Ramaria rubella O Armillaria sinapina O Rugosomyces fallax O Arcyria incarnata O Camarophyllopsis hymenocephala O Daldinia vernicosa O Mitrula lunulatospora O Tatraea macrospora O Coltricia perennis O Plicatura crispa O Hericium erinaceus O Ramaria stricta O Arrhenia epichysium O Tricholoma acerbum O Arcyria insignis O Cuphophyllus angustifolius O Elaphocordyceps capitata O Mollisia lividofusca(= Tapesia) O Thuemenella cubispora O Corticium roseum O Plicatura nivea O Hydnellum aurantiacum O Ramaria subbotrytis O Asterophora lycoperdoides O Tricholoma acre O Arcyria major O Cuphophyllus borealis O Elaphocordyceps longisegmentis O Mollisia melaleuca O Thuemenidium atropurpureum O Cotylidia diaphana O Polyporus alveolaris s.l. O Hydnellum caeruleum O Ramaria violaceibrunnea O Asterophora parasitica O Tricholoma aestuans O Arcyria nutans O Cuphophyllus canescens O Elaphocordyceps ophioglossoides O Morchella elata O Trichoderma viride O Cotylidia pannosa O Polyporus arcularius O Hydnellum concrescens O Ramaria xanthosperma O Cantharellula umbonata O Tricholoma argenteum O Arcyria oerstedii O Cuphophyllus colemannianus O Elaphomyces anthracinus O Morchella esculenta O Trichoglossum farlowii O Cryptoporus volvatus O Polyporus brumalis O Hydnellum cristatum O Ramariopsis crocea O Catathelasma ventricosum O Tricholoma atrodiscum O Arcyria stipata O Cuphophyllus lacmus O Elaphomyces asperulus O Nectria cinnabarina O Trichoglossum hirsutum var. hirsutumO Cystostereum murrayi O Polyporus craterellus O Hydnellum ferrugineum O Ramariopsis kunzei O Chrysomphalina chrysophylla O Tricholoma atrosquamosum O Ceratiomyxa fruticulosa var. fruticulosa O Cuphophyllus pratensis O Elaphomyces muricatus O Neobulgaria pura O Trichoglossum velutipes O Cytidia salicina O Polyporus melanopus O Hydnellum geogenium O Thelephora anthocephala O Clitocybe candicans O Tricholoma aurantium O Ceratiomyxa porioides O Gliophorus irrigatus O Encoelia fascicularis O Neocudoniella albiceps O Trichoglossum walteri O Daedalea quercina O Polyporus radicatus O Hydnellum peckii O Thelephora caryophyllea O Clitocybe dealbata var. sudorifica O Tricholoma caligatum O Didymium dubium O Gliophorus laetus O Encoelia furfuracea O Neolecta irregularis O Urnula craterium O Daedaleopsis confragosa O Polyporus squamosus O Hydnellum scrobiculatum O Thelephora multipartita O Clitocybe gibba O Tricholoma cingulatum O Didymium melanospermum O Gliophorus perplexus O Endocronartium harknessii O Neolecta vitellina O Ustilago maydis O Datronia mollis O Polyporus tubaeformis O Hydnellum spongiosipes O Thelephora palmata O Clitocybe metachroa O Tricholoma columbetta O Fuligo candida O Gliophorus psittacinus O Genea arenaria O Neottiella rutilans O Verpa conica O Dichomitus squalens O Polyporus umbellatus O Hydnellum suaveolens O Thelephora regularis O Clitocybe odora O Tricholoma davisiae O Fuligo leviderma O Gloioxanthomyces nitida O Geoglossum difforme O Octospora humosa O Vibrissea truncorum O Fistulina hepatica O Polyporus varius O Hydnum repandum O Thelephora terrestris O Clitocybe phaeophthalma O Tricholoma equestre O Fuligo septica O Humidicutis marginata O Geoglossum glabrum O Onygena equina O Xylaria digitata O Fomes fomentarius O Polyporus varius f. elegans O Hydnum repandum var. album O Clitocybe sinopica O Tricholoma focale O Hemitrichia calyculata 7 Chanterelles O Hygrocybe acutoconica var. acutoconica O Geopyxis carbonaria O Ophiocordyceps gracilis O Xylaria hypoxylon O Fomitiporia punctata O Porodaedalea piceina O Hydnum umbilicatum O Clitocybe squamulosa O Tricholoma fulvum O Hemitrichia clavata O Cantharellus appalachiensis O Hygrocybe cantharellus O Graphostroma platystoma O Orbilia xanthostigma O Xylaria longipes O Fomitiporia tsugina O Porodaedalea pini s.l. O Mycoacia uda O Clitocybe subclavipes O Tricholoma fumosoluteum O Hemitrichia serpula O Cantharellus cibarius O Hygrocybe ceracea O Gyromitra ambigua O Otidea alutacea O Xylaria polymorpha O Fomitopsis cajanderi O Poronidulus conchifer O Phellodon confluens O Clitocybe subditopoda O Tricholoma grave O Leocarpus fragilis O Cantharellus cibarius var. pallidifoliusO Hygrocybe chlorophana O Gyromitra esculenta O Otidea onotica O Xylaria tentaculata O Fomitopsis pinicola O Postia balsamea O Phellodon melaleucus O Clitocybe truncicola O Tricholoma imbricatum O Lycogala epidendrum O Cantharellus cinnabarinus O Hygrocybe coccinea O Gyromitra esculenta var. alba O Pachyella clypeata O Fomitopsis rosea O Postia caesia O Phellodon niger O Cystoderma amianthinum O Tricholoma intermedium O Lycogala flavofuscum 3 Trémelles, analogues O Cantharellus minor O Hygrocybe coccineocrenata O Gyromitra gigas O Peziza arvernensis O Fomitopsis spraguei O Postia fragilis O Phellodon tomentosus O Cystoderma granosum O Tricholoma magnivelare O Lycogala terrestre O Auricularia americana O Craterellus fallax O Hygrocybe conica O Gyromitra infula O Peziza azureoides O Funalia cervina O Postia guttulata O Sarcodon fennicus O Cystoderma jasonis O Tricholoma myomyces O Metatrichia vesparium O Calocera cornea O Craterellus foetidus O Hygrocybe deceptiva O Gyromitra leucoxantha O Peziza badia O Fuscoporia ferrea O Postia ptychogaster O Sarcodon fuligineoviolaceus O Cystodermella cinnabarina O Tricholoma odorum O Mucilago crustacea O Dacrymyces capitatus O Craterellus ignicolor O Hygrocybe miniata O Gyromitra perlata O Peziza brunneoatra O Ganoderma applanatum O Postia sericeomollis O Sarcodon imbricatus O Cystodermella granulosa O Tricholoma pessundatum O Physarum cinereum O Dacrymyces chrysospermus O Craterellus lutescens O Hygrocybe minutula O Helminthosphaeria clavariarum O Peziza brunneovinosa O Ganoderma resinaceum O Postia stiptica O Sarcodon scabrosus O Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca O Tricholoma populinum O Physarum leucopus O Dacrymyces minor O Craterellus subundulatus O Hygrocybe parvula O Helvella acetabulum O Peziza domiciliana O Ganoderma tsugae O Postia tephroleuca O Sarcodon squamosus O Hypsizygus tessulatus O Tricholoma portentosum O Physarum notabile O Ductifera pululahuana O Craterellus tubaeformis O Hygrocybe pseudomarchii O Helvella atra O Peziza griseorosea O Gloeophyllum sepiarium O Postia undosa O Sarcodon stereosarcinon O Hypsizygus ulmarius O Tricholoma pudorinum O Physarum polycephalum O Exidia glandulosa O Polyozellus multiplex O Hygrocybe punicea O Helvella corium O Peziza limnaea O Gloeoporus dichrous O Pseudochaete tabacina O Steccherinum ochraceum O Laccaria amethystina O Tricholoma pullum O Physarum virescens O Exidia nucleata O Hygrocybe ruber O Helvella costifera O Peziza michelii O Grifola frondosa O Pseudomerulius aureus 8 Pleurotes, Crépidotes O Laccaria bicolor O Tricholoma roseoacerbum O Physarum viride O Exidia recisa 6 Clavaires, analogues O Hygrocybe spadicea O Helvella crispa O Peziza ostracoderma O Hapalopilus rutilans O Punctularia strigosozonata O Cheimonophyllum candidissimum O Laccaria laccata var. pallidifolia O Tricholoma saponaceum O Reticularia splendens O Exidia repanda O Alloclavaria purpurea O Hygrocybe squamulosa O Helvella cupuliformis O Peziza phyllogena O Hydnochaete olivacea O Pycnoporellus fulgens O Crepidotus applanatus O Laccaria longipes O Tricholoma scalpturatum O Stemonitis axifera O Exidia saccharina O Artomyces pyxidatus O Hygrocybe vitellina O Helvella dissingii O Peziza praetervisa O Hymenochaete corrugata O Pycnoporus cinnabarinus O Crepidotus calolepis O Laccaria nobilis O Tricholoma subluteum O Stemonitis fusca O Guepinia helvelloides O Clavaria rosea O Hygrophorus agathosmus O Helvella elastica O Peziza repanda O Inocutis rheades O Radulodon aneirinus O Crepidotus cinnabarinus O Laccaria ochropurpurea O Tricholoma subsejunctum O Stemonitis nigrescens O Phleogena faginea O Clavaria rubicundula O Hygrophorus albofuscus O Helvella lactea O Peziza saccardiana O Inonotus glomeratus O Royoporus badius O Crepidotus crocophyllus O Laccaria striatula O Tricholoma transmutans O Stemonitis splendens O Pseudohydnum gelatinosum O Clavaria subfalcata O Hygrophorus bakerensis O Helvella lacunosa O Peziza succosa O Inonotus obliquus O Sarcodontia delectans O Crepidotus fusisporus O Laccaria tortilis O Tricholoma ustaloides O Trichia decipiens O Sebacina concrescens O Clavaria vermicularis O Hygrophorus camarophyllus O Helvella macropus O Peziza vesiculosa O Irpex lacteus O Sarcodontia spumea O Crepidotus malachius O Lepista gilva O Tricholoma vaccinum O Trichia favoginea O Syzygospora mycetophila O Clavaria zollingeri O Hygrophorus capreolarius O Helvella macropus var. brevis O Peziza violacea
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation
    Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation Establishment of the 95-foot wide construction corridor and TEWAs would likely remove individuals of H. caeruleus and modify microclimate conditions around individuals that are not removed. The removal of forests and host trees and disturbance to soil could negatively affect H. caeruleus in adjacent areas by removing its habitat, disturbing the roots of host trees, and affecting its mycorrhizal association with the trees, potentially affecting site persistence. Restored portions of the corridor and TEWAs would be dominated by early seral vegetation for approximately 30 years, which would result in long-term changes to habitat conditions. A 30-foot wide portion of the corridor would be maintained in low-growing vegetation for pipeline maintenance and would not provide habitat for the species during the life of the project. Hygrophorus caeruleus is not likely to persist at one of the sites in the project area because of the extent of impacts and the proximity of the recorded observation to the corridor. Hygrophorus caeruleus is likely to persist at the remaining three sites in the project area (MP 168.8 and MP 172.4 (north), and MP 172.5-172.7) because the majority of observations within the sites are more than 90 feet from the corridor, where direct effects are not anticipated and indirect effects are unlikely. The site at MP 168.8 is in a forested area on an east-facing slope, and a paved road occurs through the southeast part of the site. Four out of five observations are more than 90 feet southwest of the corridor and are not likely to be directly or indirectly affected by the PCGP Project based on the distance from the corridor, extent of forests surrounding the observations, and proximity to an existing open corridor (the road), indicating the species is likely resilient to edge- related effects at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Spore Prints
    SPORE PRINTS BULLETIN OF THE PUGET SOUND MYCOLOGICAL SOCIETY Number 473 June 2011 OLDEST, ODDEST FUNGI FINALLY “The big message here is that most fungi and most fungal diversity PHOTOGRAPHED Susan Milius reside in fungi that have neither been collected nor cultivated,” Science News, May 12, 2011 says John W. Taylor of the University of California, Berkeley. Exeter team member Meredith Jones spotted the hard-to-detect organisms by marking them with fluorescent tags. The trick re- vealed fungal cells attached to algal cells as if parasitizing them. M. Jones One of the big questions about early fungi is whether they might have arisen from “some kind of parasitic ancestor like Rozella,” says Rytas Vilgalys of Duke University. Interesting, yes. But loosening the definition of fungi to include organisms without chitin walls could wreak havoc in the concept of that group, objects Robert Lücking of the Field Museum in Chicago. “I would actually conclude, based on the evidence, that these are not fungi,” he says. Instead, they might be near rela- tives—an almost-fungus. Two fungal cells, possibly from an ancient lineage, each show a curvy, taillike flagellum (red) during a mobile stage in their life cycle. IS MUTATED FUNGUS KILLING AMERICAN BATS? Andy Coghlan Images of little dots, some wriggling a skinny tail, give scientists New Scientist, May 24, 2011 a first glimpse of a vast swath of the oldest, and perhaps oddest, fungal group alive today. A fungus blamed for killing more than a mil- The first views suggest that, unlike any other fungi known, these lion bats in the US since 2006 has been found might live as essentially naked cells without the rigid cell wall to differ only slightly from an apparently that supposedly defines a fungus, says Tom Richards of the Natu- harmless European version.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to Common Macrofungi in Eastern Forests and Their Ecosystem Functions
    United States Department of Field Guide to Agriculture Common Macrofungi Forest Service in Eastern Forests Northern Research Station and Their Ecosystem General Technical Report NRS-79 Functions Michael E. Ostry Neil A. Anderson Joseph G. O’Brien Cover Photos Front: Morel, Morchella esculenta. Photo by Neil A. Anderson, University of Minnesota. Back: Bear’s Head Tooth, Hericium coralloides. Photo by Michael E. Ostry, U.S. Forest Service. The Authors MICHAEL E. OSTRY, research plant pathologist, U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station, St. Paul, MN NEIL A. ANDERSON, professor emeritus, University of Minnesota, Department of Plant Pathology, St. Paul, MN JOSEPH G. O’BRIEN, plant pathologist, U.S. Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, St. Paul, MN Manuscript received for publication 23 April 2010 Published by: For additional copies: U.S. FOREST SERVICE U.S. Forest Service 11 CAMPUS BLVD SUITE 200 Publications Distribution NEWTOWN SQUARE PA 19073 359 Main Road Delaware, OH 43015-8640 April 2011 Fax: (740)368-0152 Visit our homepage at: http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/ CONTENTS Introduction: About this Guide 1 Mushroom Basics 2 Aspen-Birch Ecosystem Mycorrhizal On the ground associated with tree roots Fly Agaric Amanita muscaria 8 Destroying Angel Amanita virosa, A. verna, A. bisporigera 9 The Omnipresent Laccaria Laccaria bicolor 10 Aspen Bolete Leccinum aurantiacum, L. insigne 11 Birch Bolete Leccinum scabrum 12 Saprophytic Litter and Wood Decay On wood Oyster Mushroom Pleurotus populinus (P. ostreatus) 13 Artist’s Conk Ganoderma applanatum
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Fungi in Ireland
    FOREST FUNGI IN IRELAND PAUL DOWDING and LOUIS SMITH COFORD, National Council for Forest Research and Development Arena House Arena Road Sandyford Dublin 18 Ireland Tel: + 353 1 2130725 Fax: + 353 1 2130611 © COFORD 2008 First published in 2008 by COFORD, National Council for Forest Research and Development, Dublin, Ireland. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, or stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying recording or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from COFORD. All photographs and illustrations are the copyright of the authors unless otherwise indicated. ISBN 1 902696 62 X Title: Forest fungi in Ireland. Authors: Paul Dowding and Louis Smith Citation: Dowding, P. and Smith, L. 2008. Forest fungi in Ireland. COFORD, Dublin. The views and opinions expressed in this publication belong to the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect those of COFORD. i CONTENTS Foreword..................................................................................................................v Réamhfhocal...........................................................................................................vi Preface ....................................................................................................................vii Réamhrá................................................................................................................viii Acknowledgements...............................................................................................ix
    [Show full text]
  • The Bioaccumulation of Some Heavy Metals in the Fruiting Body of Wild Growing Mushrooms
    Available online at www.notulaebotanicae.ro Print ISSN 0255-965X; Electronic 1842-4309 Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj 38 (2) 2010, Special Issue, 147-151 Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca The Bioaccumulation of Some Heavy Metals in the Fruiting Body of Wild Growing Mushrooms Carmen Cristina ELEKES1) , Gabriela BUSUIOC1) , Gheorghe IONITA 2) 1) Valahia University of Targoviste, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Biotechnologies, Bd. Regele Carol I, no. 2, Romania; [email protected] 2) Valahia University of Targoviste, Faculty of Materials Engineering, Mechatronics and Robotics, Bd. Regele Carol I, no. 2, Romania Abstract Due to their effective mechanism of accumulation of heavy metals from soil, the macrofungi show high concentrations of metals in their fruiting body. According with this ability, the mushrooms can be used to evaluate and control the level of environmental pollution, but also represent danger for human ingestion. We analyzed some macrofungi species from a wooded area to establish the heavy metal concentrations and ability of bioaccumulation and translocation for Zn, Cu and Sn in fruiting body. The metallic content was established by the Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry method (ICP-AES). The minimal detection limits of method is 0.4 mg/kg for Zn and Cu and 0.6 mg/kg for Sn. Heavy metals concentrations in the fruiting body ranged between 6.98- 20.10 mg/kg for Zn (the higher value was for Tapinella atrotomentosa); 16.13-144.94 mg/kg for Cu (the higher value was for Hypholoma fasciculare); and 24.36-150.85 mg/kg for Sn (the higher value was for Paxillus involutus).
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of Pyrophilous Taxa of Pholiota Described from North America Reveals Four Species—P
    Mycologia ISSN: 0027-5514 (Print) 1557-2536 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/umyc20 Revision of pyrophilous taxa of Pholiota described from North America reveals four species—P. brunnescens, P. castanea, P. highlandensis, and P. molesta P. Brandon Matheny, Rachel A. Swenie, Andrew N. Miller, Ronald H. Petersen & Karen W. Hughes To cite this article: P. Brandon Matheny, Rachel A. Swenie, Andrew N. Miller, Ronald H. Petersen & Karen W. Hughes (2018): Revision of pyrophilous taxa of Pholiota described from North America reveals four species—P.brunnescens,P.castanea,P.highlandensis, and P.molesta, Mycologia, DOI: 10.1080/00275514.2018.1516960 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2018.1516960 Published online: 27 Nov 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 28 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=umyc20 MYCOLOGIA https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2018.1516960 Revision of pyrophilous taxa of Pholiota described from North America reveals four species—P. brunnescens, P. castanea, P. highlandensis, and P. molesta P. Brandon Matheny a, Rachel A. Sweniea, Andrew N. Miller b, Ronald H. Petersen a, and Karen W. Hughesa aDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Dabney 569, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-1610; bIllinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, 1816 South Oak Street, Champaign, Illinois 61820 ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY A systematic reevaluation of North American pyrophilous or “burn-loving” species of Pholiota is Received 17 March 2018 presented based on molecular and morphological examination of type and historical collections.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Checklist of Arizona Macrofungi
    A PRELIMINARY CHECKLIST OF ARIZONA MACROFUNGI Scott T. Bates School of Life Sciences Arizona State University PO Box 874601 Tempe, AZ 85287-4601 ABSTRACT A checklist of 1290 species of nonlichenized ascomycetaceous, basidiomycetaceous, and zygomycetaceous macrofungi is presented for the state of Arizona. The checklist was compiled from records of Arizona fungi in scientific publications or herbarium databases. Additional records were obtained from a physical search of herbarium specimens in the University of Arizona’s Robert L. Gilbertson Mycological Herbarium and of the author’s personal herbarium. This publication represents the first comprehensive checklist of macrofungi for Arizona. In all probability, the checklist is far from complete as new species await discovery and some of the species listed are in need of taxonomic revision. The data presented here serve as a baseline for future studies related to fungal biodiversity in Arizona and can contribute to state or national inventories of biota. INTRODUCTION Arizona is a state noted for the diversity of its biotic communities (Brown 1994). Boreal forests found at high altitudes, the ‘Sky Islands’ prevalent in the southern parts of the state, and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa P.& C. Lawson) forests that are widespread in Arizona, all provide rich habitats that sustain numerous species of macrofungi. Even xeric biomes, such as desertscrub and semidesert- grasslands, support a unique mycota, which include rare species such as Itajahya galericulata A. Møller (Long & Stouffer 1943b, Fig. 2c). Although checklists for some groups of fungi present in the state have been published previously (e.g., Gilbertson & Budington 1970, Gilbertson et al. 1974, Gilbertson & Bigelow 1998, Fogel & States 2002), this checklist represents the first comprehensive listing of all macrofungi in the kingdom Eumycota (Fungi) that are known from Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Shropshire Fungus Checklist 2010
    THE CHECKLIST OF SHROPSHIRE FUNGI 2011 Contents Page Introduction 2 Name changes 3 Taxonomic Arrangement (with page numbers) 19 Checklist 25 Indicator species 229 Rare and endangered fungi in /Shropshire (Excluding BAP species) 230 Important sites for fungi in Shropshire 232 A List of BAP species and their status in Shropshire 233 Acknowledgements and References 234 1 CHECKLIST OF SHROPSHIRE FUNGI Introduction The county of Shropshire (VC40) is large and landlocked and contains all major habitats, apart from coast and dune. These include the uplands of the Clees, Stiperstones and Long Mynd with their associated heath land, forested land such as the Forest of Wyre and the Mortimer Forest, the lowland bogs and meres in the north of the county, and agricultural land scattered with small woodlands and copses. This diversity makes Shropshire unique. The Shropshire Fungus Group has been in existence for 18 years. (Inaugural meeting 6th December 1992. The aim was to produce a fungus flora for the county. This aim has not yet been realised for a number of reasons, chief amongst these are manpower and cost. The group has however collected many records by trawling the archives, contributions from interested individuals/groups, and by field meetings. It is these records that are published here. The first Shropshire checklist was published in 1997. Many more records have now been added and nearly 40,000 of these have now been added to the national British Mycological Society’s database, the Fungus Record Database for Britain and Ireland (FRDBI). During this ten year period molecular biology, i.e. DNA analysis has been applied to fungal classification.
    [Show full text]
  • 989946 1302 1170751 1057 After
    ITS1 ITS2 Seqs OTUs Seqs OTUs Fungi (0.95) 992852 1911 1173834 1691 Raw in OTU 989946 1302 1170751 1057 table (n≥10) After decontam 915747 1206 1016235 1044 Final(97% 889290 1193 992890 1032 coverage) Table S1. Total sequence count + OTUs for ITS1 + ITS2 datasets at each OTU table trimming step.1Non-target samples discarded. ITS1 ITS2 Seqs zOTUs Seqs zOTUs All zotus1 1061048 3135 2689730 1880 Fungi 1024007 3094 1210397 1705 (0.95) After 997077 3012 1107636 1685 decontam Final(97% 967316 2772 1083789 1559 coverage) Table S2. Total sequence count + zotus (n=8) for ITS1 + ITS2 datasets at each zotu table trimming step. 1Non-target samples and "zotus"/ASVs with <8 copies discarded. Bistorta vivipara Dryas octopetala Salix polaris (n=519)1 (n=22) (n=20)2 Fungi (0.95) 917667 41314 33871 Raw in OTU 914888 41272 33786 table (n≥10) After 843137 39880 32730 decontam Final (97% 803649 39880 30069 coverage) Sequences min=251, min=382, min=449, per avg=1523.6, avg=1812.7, avg=1551.2, sample max=7680 max=3735 max=3516 Table S3. ITS1 data quality filtering steps (OTUs). For Bistorta vivipara, 80 samples of the original 599 that had too few sequences to meet the coverage threshold of 97% in both the OTU and zotu datasets were discarded. 21 Salix polaris sample was discarded for the same reason. Bistorta vivipara Dryas octopetala Salix polaris (n=519)1 (n=22) (n=20) 2 Fungi (0.95) 984812 44702 36145 After 919672 43286 34119 decontam Final (97% 908621 43286 33141 coverage) Sequences min=251, min=382, min=449, per avg=1519.4, avg=1812.7, avg=1546.7, sample max=7680 max=3730 max=3516 Table S4.
    [Show full text]
  • Keanekaragaman Jenis Jamur Makroskopis Di Hutan Desa Tewah Pupuh Kabupaten Barito Timur
    BiosciED: Journal of Biological Science and Education Vol. 1 No. 1, 2020 p-ISSN: 2746-9786 DOI: 10.37304 KEANEKARAGAMAN JENIS JAMUR MAKROSKOPIS DI HUTAN DESA TEWAH PUPUH KABUPATEN BARITO TIMUR Sri Leluni1*, Siti Sunariyati2, Adventus Panda2 1Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, FKIP, Universitas Palangka Raya, Palangka Raya 2Program Studi Biologi, FMIPA, Universitas Palangka Raya, Palangka Raya *email: [email protected] Abstrak. Jamur termasuk sel eukariotik yang tidak memiliki klorofil, tumbuh dari hifa, memiliki dinding sel yang mengandung kitin, bersifat heterotrof, menyerap nutrien melalui dinding selnya, dan mengekresikan enzim ekstraseluler ke lingkungan melalui spora, melakukan reproduksi seksual dan aseksual. Jamur makroskopis adalah jamur yang tubuh buahnya berukuran besar (berukuran 0,6 cm atau lebih besar), struktur reproduktif yang terbentuk untuk menghasilkan dan menyebarkan sporanya. Keberadaan jenis jamur di Hutan Desa Tewah Pupuh Kabupaten Barito Timur masih banyak yang belum diketahui dan tidak dibudidayakan. Kurangnya perhatian pemerintah daerah setempat terhadap keanekaragaman dan pelestarian merupakan alasan penting untuk dilakukannya penelitian. Penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk mengetahui keanekaragaman jamur Makroskopis di Desa Tewah Pupuh dan diharapkan dapat membantu pembelajaran siswa di Sekolah Menengah Atas dalam Materi Keanekaragaman Hayati. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode survei dengan teknik Purposive Sampling untuk menjelajah daerah yang terdapat jenis jamur, yaitu dengan dilakukannya
    [Show full text]
  • Mycology Praha
    f I VO LUM E 52 I / I [ 1— 1 DECEMBER 1999 M y c o l o g y l CZECH SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY FOR MYCOLOGY PRAHA J\AYCn nI .O §r%u v J -< M ^/\YC/-\ ISSN 0009-°476 n | .O r%o v J -< Vol. 52, No. 1, December 1999 CZECH MYCOLOGY ! formerly Česká mykologie published quarterly by the Czech Scientific Society for Mycology EDITORIAL BOARD Editor-in-Cliief ; ZDENĚK POUZAR (Praha) ; Managing editor JAROSLAV KLÁN (Praha) j VLADIMÍR ANTONÍN (Brno) JIŘÍ KUNERT (Olomouc) ! OLGA FASSATIOVÁ (Praha) LUDMILA MARVANOVÁ (Brno) | ROSTISLAV FELLNER (Praha) PETR PIKÁLEK (Praha) ; ALEŠ LEBEDA (Olomouc) MIRKO SVRČEK (Praha) i Czech Mycology is an international scientific journal publishing papers in all aspects of 1 mycology. Publication in the journal is open to members of the Czech Scientific Society i for Mycology and non-members. | Contributions to: Czech Mycology, National Museum, Department of Mycology, Václavské 1 nám. 68, 115 79 Praha 1, Czech Republic. Phone: 02/24497259 or 96151284 j SUBSCRIPTION. Annual subscription is Kč 350,- (including postage). The annual sub­ scription for abroad is US $86,- or DM 136,- (including postage). The annual member­ ship fee of the Czech Scientific Society for Mycology (Kč 270,- or US $60,- for foreigners) includes the journal without any other additional payment. For subscriptions, address changes, payment and further information please contact The Czech Scientific Society for ! Mycology, P.O.Box 106, 11121 Praha 1, Czech Republic. This journal is indexed or abstracted in: i Biological Abstracts, Abstracts of Mycology, Chemical Abstracts, Excerpta Medica, Bib­ liography of Systematic Mycology, Index of Fungi, Review of Plant Pathology, Veterinary Bulletin, CAB Abstracts, Rewicw of Medical and Veterinary Mycology.
    [Show full text]
  • Styrylpyrone-Class Compounds from Medicinal Fungi Phellinus and Inonotus Spp., and Their Medicinal Importance
    The Journal of Antibiotics (2011) 64, 349–359 & 2011 Japan Antibiotics Research Association All rights reserved 0021-8820/11 $32.00 www.nature.com/ja REVIEW ARTICLE Styrylpyrone-class compounds from medicinal fungi Phellinus and Inonotus spp., and their medicinal importance In-Kyoung Lee and Bong-Sik Yun Members of the genera Phellinus and Inonotus, including P. linteus, P. igniarius, P. ribis, I. obliquus and I. xeranticus are well-known medicinal fungi (mushrooms) and have been used in treatment of cancer, diabetes, bacterial and viral infections and ulcer. Adverse effects of these medicinal mushrooms have not yet been reported, indicating the safe nature of these mushrooms. Polysaccharides, particularly b-glucan, are considered the compounds responsible for the biological activity of medicinal mushrooms. However, there is only a limited amount of evidence to indicate that polysaccharides are in fact responsible for the biological effects of these medicinal mushrooms. Recently, many research groups have begun identification of active low-MW compounds in medicinal mushrooms, with a focus on the yellow polyphenol pigments, which are composed of a styrylpyrone class of compounds. Interestingly, a representative group of medicinal fungi, including P. linteus, P. igniarius, P. ribis, I. obliquus and I. xeranticus were shown to produce a large and diverse range of styrylpyrone-type polyphenol pigments that exhibited various biological activities, including anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic, anti-platelet aggregation, anti-diabetic, anti-dementia and anti-viral effects. Styrylpyrone pigments in mushrooms are thought to have a role similar to that of flavonoids in plants. The unique and unprecedented carbon skeleton of fused styrylpyrone might be an attractive molecular scaffold for pharmacological applications.
    [Show full text]