Summary Comments on Trunk Walking And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Canberra Pedestrian Forum Canberra Pedestrian Forum - consolidated comments on walking and cycling infrastructure projects Table of Contents General comments/priorities..........................................................................1 Priorities for 2011...........................................................................................3 Future Priorities..............................................................................................4 Ranking methods...........................................................................................6 North Canberra - Civic Cycle Loop..................................................................9 North Canberra – Bunda St Shared Space......................................................9 South Canberra - Brisbane Avenue on road lanes........................................10 South Canberra - Kings Avenue on road lanes..............................................10 South Canberra - Kings Avenue off road path...............................................10 South Canberra - Kingston foreshore temporary connection........................11 Woden Accessible Street project – Bradley St..............................................11 Woden - Wisdom Street link.........................................................................11 Tuggeranong Accessible Street Project – Pittman St and Athllon Dr.............12 Tuggeranong - Athllon Drive on-road cycle lanes - Atkins to Hindmarsh......12 Gungahlin Accessible Street Project – Hibberson St.....................................12 Gungahlin - Hibberson Street Shared Space................................................12 Belconnen Accessible Street project – Lathlain & Chandler Sts....................12 Belconnen - Chandler Street On Road Cycle Lanes......................................13 General comments/priorities These comments supersede our previous comments. Recommendations The Canberra Pedestrian Forum recommends that: 1. the following projects proceed: • Woden Accessible Street project – Bradley St. • Woden - Wisdom Street link. • Tuggeranong Accessible Street Project – Pittman St and Athllon Dr. • Gungahlin Accessible Street Project – Hibberson St; Canberra Pedestrian Forum www.tinyurl/walkact 1 Canberra Pedestrian Forum 2. The South Canberra - Kings Avenue off road path proceed, subject to speed controls where pedestrian and cycle routes coincide, and a minimum shared path width of 3.5 metres; 3. the following projects proceed only if sufficient funds are available in 2011-2012: • South Canberra - Brisbane Avenue on road lanes. • South Canberra - Kings Avenue on road path. • Belconnen Accessible Street project – Lathlain & Chandler Sts. • Belconnen - Chandler Street On Road Cycle Lane (for safety reasons, subject to either the speed limit being reduced to 30 km/h or the median being retained); 4. the following projects not proceed in their current form: • Civic Cycle Loop. • Bunda St Shared Space. • South Canberra - Kingston foreshore temporary connection. • Tuggeranong - Athllon Drive on-road cycle lanes - Atkins to Hindmarsh. • Gungahlin - Hibberson Street Shared Space; 5. as recommended by Professor Leo Dobes of the Crawford School of Economics and Government, walking and cycling infrastructure projects should in future be short-listed on the basis of cost- effectiveness, measured if feasible by willingness to pay; 6. the twenty most cost-effective projects (Table 2) be considered for future funding, ahead of the less cost-effective of the projects in the 2011 short list; 7. future reviews of Canberra's walking infrastructure consider the entire walking and cycling network, noting that every journey begins and ends at home, but not every journey involves travel on a trunk route; 8. the economic measures that the ACT Treasury requires, to justify expenditure on walking and cycling projects, be equivalent to the economic measures that the Treasury requires to justify expenditure on motor vehicle infrastructure projects; and 9. Projects be weighted more favourably if they cater for both walking and cycling, rather than for only one mode of transport. Canberra Pedestrian Forum www.tinyurl/walkact 2 Canberra Pedestrian Forum Priorities for 2011 The Canberra Pedestrian Forum has ranked the cost-effectiveness of the projects short listed for 2011, using July 2011 costings. The results are shown in Table 1. Rank Project Cost per unit effectiveness 1 Accessible Street – Bradley St Woden $0.29m 2 Bunda Street Shared Space $0.40m 3 Accessible Street – Pittman St and Athllon Drive $0.44m Tuggeranong 4 Kingston Foreshore Link - off road path1 $0.59m 5 Hibberson St Shared Space $0.63m 6 Accessible Street – Hibberson St Gungahlin $0.64m 7 Kings Avenue - off road path $0.94m 8 Wisdom street link - off road Options 1A and 2A2 $1.88m 9 Accessible Street – Lathlain and Chandler Sts $2.10m Belconnen 10 Chandler Street - on road lanes $2.55m 11 Kings Avenue - on road lanes $3.05m 12 Brisbane Avenue - on road lanes Option 1 $6.05m 13 Civic Cycle Loop - Copenhagen lanes along Marcus $12.02m Clarke, Rudd and Allara Streets and part of Bunda Street. 14 Athllon Drive cycle lanes - Atkins to Hindmarsh $30.75m Table 1: Cost-effectiveness ranking of projects short listed for 2011. 1 The Kingston Foreshore Link is a temporary measure, pending completion in 2012 of the off-road lakeside shared path. 2 The proposed Wisdom Street Link does not include the Kent St section that was included in the original proposal. Canberra Pedestrian Forum www.tinyurl/walkact 3 Canberra Pedestrian Forum Future Priorities Using the method described below, we have identified the twenty most cost-effective of the initial 201 projects (Table 2). Rank Project name Effec- Initial Cost per tiveness cost unit effec- score estimate tiveness 1 Thesiger Court Link - off road path 0.52 $10,000 $19,274 2 Widen footpath on Wentworth 0.53 $15,000 $28,261 Avenue - off road link 3 Knox Street to Simpson Street - off- 0.55 $25,000 $45,131 road path sealing 4 University avenue - off road path 0.30 $15,000 $49,408 5 Bunda Street shared space 0.49 $30,000 $61,440 6 Fisher off-road path 0.49 $30,000 $61,828 7 Menindee Drive off-road path 0.53 $35,000 $65,788 8 The Valley Avenue to Gundaroo 0.24 $20,000 $82,235 Drive link - on road lanes 9 Accessible Street - Gungahlin 0.30 $25,000 $84,155 10 Mawson Shops bypass route - off 0.53 $45,000 $84,728 road path 11 Lake to War Memorial Links - off 0.54 $50,000 $92,274 road path 12 Easty Street link - off road path 0.26 $25,000 $95,764 13 Athllon Drive off-road path missing 0.52 $50,000 $96,265 link 14 Aikman Drive cycle lanes extension 0.24 $25,000 $102,477 - on road lanes 15 Edinburgh Ave - on road lanes 0.27 $30,000 $109,229 16 Launceston Street - on road 0.31 $35,000 $111,314 17 Tuggeranong Bus Interchange 0.23 $30,000 $128,003 access 18 Ginninderra Drive off-road path, 0.49 $65,000 $133,203 UoC to Lake Ginninderra 19 Weston to Tuggeranong - off road 0.55 $75,000 $136,754 path 20 Improvement of off-road path 0.17 $25,000 $144,675 crossing at Miller Street between Macarthur and Quandong Streets Table 2: Twenty most cost-effective projects (based on initial costings) Two of the projects short-listed for 2011 are also among the twenty most cost-effective projects. These are Bunda Street shared space and Accessible Street Gungahlin. Pedestrian Forum cost-effectiveness ranking method The Canberra Pedestrian Forum ranking method uses the same data as the Cardno ranking method, but differs in the following respects: Canberra Pedestrian Forum www.tinyurl/walkact 4 Canberra Pedestrian Forum Criterion Canberra Cardno method Pedestrian Forum method Project “Cost per unit Project cost was divided by the number of cost effectiveness” people living within 500 metres of the route. was obtained by This factor was normalised to 10% of the dividing the maximum possible score, and added to the project cost by total of the other scores. the weighted Because two projects with extreme cost-per total of the 3 other scores. person scores were included , the normalised cost scores of the remaining 199 projects ranged over less than 1% of the maximum possible score. Criteria As determined “Number of attractors” was changed to from community “weighted number of attractors per km.” consultation – see Table 5.3 of “Total population served by route” was the Cardno changed to “total population served by route report. per km.” “Total jobs served by route” was changed to “total jobs served by route per km.” Criteria Proportional to “Connectivity” weighting was reduced from 7 weightings “points scored points out of 33 (21%) to 20%. in consultation workshop” as “Demand” weighting was increased from 5 reported in points out of 33 (15%) to 20%. Table 5.3 of the “Network Enhancement” weighting was Cardno report. reduced from 8 points out of 33 (24%) to 20%. “Safety” weighting was reduced from 11 points out of 33 (33%) to 20%. “Strategic Importance” weighting was increased from 2 points out of 33 (6%) to 10%. Population Mouat St project The Mouat St project was erroneously excluded from attributed a population of 170,148. This consideration. resulted in the “population” scores of all other projects being normalised to much less than the nominated 10%. 3 “Lanyon Drive on-road cycle lanes”($65,000, population zero, infinite cost per person) and “Fyshwick-to-airport off-road path” ($17m, population 34, cost-effectiveness” factor $0.5 million per person). Canberra Pedestrian Forum www.tinyurl/walkact 5 Canberra Pedestrian Forum Criterion Canberra Cardno method