Heard Island, a Case Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Heard Island, a Case Study BRYOPHYTE DIVERSITY AND TERRESTRIAL PLANT ECOLOGY IN THE SUBANTARCTIC : HEARD ISLAND, A CASE STUDY Dana Michelle Bergstrom B.Sc. M.Sc. A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. February, 1993. School of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University. MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY HIGHER DEGREE THESIS (PhD) AUTHOR’S CONSENT This is to certify that I, being a candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy am aware of the policy of the University relating to the retention and use of higher degree theses as contained in the University’s PhD Regulations generally, and in particular, Regulation 21(2). In the light of this policy and the provisions of the above Regulations, I agree to allow a copy of my thesis to be deposited in the University Library for consultation, loan and photocopying forthwith. \............ Z?5:^ ^ “Tr /Signature of Witness Signature of Candidate Dated t h i s .......................oL ... day of . 19 3 The Academic Senate on 10 August 1993 resolved that the candidate had satisfied requirements for admission to this degree. This thesis represents a major part of the prescribed program of study. Certificate of originality I hereby declare that the data and information in this thesis have not been submitted elsewhere for any other degree. Except where expressly acknowledged to the contrary in the text or acknowledgements all the work is my own. Dana Michelle Bergstrom Contents CONTENTS ABSTRACT ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CHAPTER 1 Introduction and description of environments 1.1 Introduction to the Subantarctic Zone and to this project............................................................................... ...1 1.1.1 Subantarctic Zone................................................................................................................................. ...1 1.1.2 Introduction to the project.................................................................................................................. ...3 1.2 Heard Island 1.2.1 Geology, origin and physiography..................................................................................................... ...4 1.2.2 Climate.................................................................................................................................................. ...9 1.2.3 Past and present vegetation of Heard Island...................................................................................... .10 1.2.4 Fauna .................................................................................................................................................... .19 1.3 Marion and Prince Edward Island. 1.3.1 Geology, origin and physiography...................................................................................................... .20 1.3.2 Climate ................................................................................................................................................ .20 1.3.3 Vegetation.............................................................................................................................................. .21 1.4 Macquarie Island 1.4.1 Geology, origin and physiography...................................................................................................... .22 1.4.2 Clim ate.................................................................................................................................................. .23 1.4.3 Vegetation............................................................................................................................................. .23 1.5 Comparison of Heard Island physical environments with Marion and Prince Edward Islands, and other subantarctic islands........................................................................ .25 1.6 Summary .................................................................................................................................................... .28 CHAPTER TWO Vegetation survey methods 2.1 General survey details........................................................................................................................................... ,30 CHAPTER THREE The bryoflora of Heard Island: revised checklist, annotations and phytogeographical considerations. 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... .33 3.2 Collections .................................................................................................................................................. ,34 3.3 Annotated species list of bryophyte taxa recorded from Heard Island 3.3.1 Mosses.................................................................................................................................................... ,34 3.3.2 Liverworts............................................................................................................................................... 38 3.3.3 Summary Notes on Clifford’s 1953 checklist..................................................................................... 39 3.4 Discussion 3.4.1 Phytogeography..................................................................................................................................... 39 3.4.2 Size of Flora............................................................................................................................................ 42 3.5 Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 42 CHAPTER FOUR Distribution of bryophytes on Heard Island 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 44 4.2 Methods 4.2.1 Analysis of distribution..................................................................................................................... 45 4.3 Distribution and Diversity........................................................................................................................ 45 4.4 Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 47 Contents CHAPTER FIVE The diversity of bryophytes within Heard Island vegetation units 5.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 48 5.2 Bryophytes in Hughes' (1987) vascular plant categories..................................................................................... 49 5.3 Ordination and classification analyses 5.3.1 TWINSPAN Classification analysis.......................................................................................................50 5.3.2 DECORANA analysis.............................................................................................................................54 5.4 Details of ecological groups.................................................................................................................................. 57 5.5 Discussion ...................................................................................................................................................... 65 5.6 Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 66 CHAPTER SIX Vegetation patterning in feldmark on Heard Island and other subantarctic islands 6.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 69 6.2 Heard Island sites 6.2.1 Macey Cone, Laurens Peninsula............................................................................................................. 70 6.2.2 Dovers Moraine, Spit Bay....................................................................................................................... 74 6.3 Marion and Prince Edward Islands sites 6.3.1 Kaalkopie lava flow, Marion Island........................................................................................................78 6.3.2 Kent Crater, Prince Edward Island.........................................................................................................80 6.4 Discussion of patterning and establishment of hypothesis 6.4.1 Discussion..................................................................................................................................................82 6.4.2 Hypothesis.................................................................................................................................................83 6.5 Testing the hypothesis on Macquarie Island 6.5.1 Feldmark on Macquarie Island................................................................................................................84 6.5.2 Sites ...................................................................................................................................................... 84 6.5.3 Propagule germination trials....................................................................................................................87 6.5.4 Surface movement.....................................................................................................................................89
Recommended publications
  • TERRESTRIAL VEGETATION and ENVIRONMENTS on HEARD ISLAND by D.M
    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 133(2), 2000 33 TERRESTRIAL VEGETATION AND ENVIRONMENTS ON HEARD ISLAND by D.M. Bergstrom and P.M. Selkirk (with three tables, one text-figure, one plate and an appendix) BERGSTROM, D.M. & SELKIRK, P.M., 2000 (30:vi): Terrestrial vegetation and environments on Heard Island. In Banks, M.R. & Brown, M.J. (Eds): HEARD ISLAND PAPERS. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 133(2): 33-46. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.133.2.33 ISSN 0080-4703. Department ofBotany, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 4072 (DMB); and Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2019 (PMS). Significantly ice-covered and with a very small flora (11 vascular species and about 60 bryophyte taxa), Heard Island is still emerging from the effects of the last glacial maximum. This study presents the results of a general vegetation survey. A baseline framework of environmental conditions that affect vegetation on the island is described and a classification (TWINS PAN) analysis based on presence/ absence data of both vascular plant species and bryophyte taxa is provided. Distinct suites of taxa were identified on the island, some containing bryophytes only. Fifreen ecological groups were delineated. A discussion of ecological amplitude ofimportant bryophyte and vascular plant taxa on Heard Island is included. Key Words: Subantarctic, tundra, vegetation, bryophytes, cushion plants, Heard Island. INTRODUCTION during the Tertiary and included a variety of ferns and a podocarp (Quilty et al. 1983). Subantarctic Heard Island (53°06'S, 73°32'E) is approxi­ There have been few studies of terrestrial plant ecology mately 4850 km southeast of southern Africa, 4350 km on Heard Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus-PAV in the Sub-Antarctic
    Distribution of Barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV in the Sub-Antarctic Kerguelen Islands and characterization of two new [i]Luteovirus[/i] species Laurence Svanella-Dumas, Thierry Candresse, Maurice Hullé, Armelle Marais-Colombel To cite this version: Laurence Svanella-Dumas, Thierry Candresse, Maurice Hullé, Armelle Marais-Colombel. Distribution of Barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV in the Sub-Antarctic Kerguelen Islands and characterization of two new [i]Luteovirus[/i] species. PLoS ONE, Public Library of Science, 2013, 8 (6), pp.e67231. 10.1371/journal.pone.0067231. hal-01208609 HAL Id: hal-01208609 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01208609 Submitted on 29 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distribution of Barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV in the Sub- Antarctic Kerguelen Islands and Characterization of Two New Luteovirus Species Laurence Svanella-Dumas1,2, Thierry Candresse1,2, Maurice Hulle´ 3, Armelle Marais1,2* 1 INRA, UMR 1332 de Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie, CS20032 Villenave d9Ornon, France, 2 Univ. Bordeaux, UMR 1332 de Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie, CS20032 Villenave d9Ornon, France, 3 Institut de Ge´ne´tique, Environnement et Protection des Plantes, Agrocampus Rennes, UMR INRA 1349, BP 35327, Le Rheu, France Abstract A systematic search for viral infection was performed in the isolated Kerguelen Islands, using a range of polyvalent genus- specific PCR assays.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Heard Island Expedition Project Description
    2016 Heard Island Expedition Project Description Definition TITLE BIOGEOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF THE SUBGLACIAL REGIME ON HEARD ISLAND USING GLACIAL STREAMS AS REMOTE SAMPLING PROBES Abstract We plan to examine the chemical composition and particulate loads of glacial streams at Heard Island as a probe of the geochemical and geophysical composition of the parent rocks, and the microbiological activity of the subglacial till. Given the impressive size and discharge of many of these streams, and their deposition of large amounts of fine sediment in various lagoons and the ocean, these streams are obviously transporting large amounts of material from underneath the glaciers. Lixiviation and direct solution will add solutes to the meltwater, providing a clear chemical signature in samples taken downstream. In addition, subglacial till is a refugium for microbial life which will be carried in the runoff. This work will consist of collecting samples from as many streams as possible, followed by laboratory characterization of the particulates, solutes, and bioactive components. Principal Investigator Fred Belton Cordell Expeditions Principal Investigator Robert Schmieder Cordell Expeditions Co-Investigator Gavin Marshall Tangaroa Blue Foundation Co-Investigator William Mitchell Cordell Expeditions Co-Investigator Staff U. S. Geological Survey Co-Investigator Carlos Nascimento Biochemist Co-Investigator Patrick Quilty University of Tasmania Co-Investigator Maria Hauger Consultant Co-Investigator Onsite team members Cordell Expeditions Context Background Satellite images of Heard Island taken in 2014 have sufficient resolution to exhibit many glacial melt streams, clearly seen as they approach the shoreline and disappear into the ocean, some entering lagoons depositing large amounts of fine sediment. Most of these streams, especially the longer ones (descending up to 3 km) show classic meanders with periods ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Landform Studies in Mosedale, Northeastern Lake District: Opportunities for Field Investigations
    Field Studies, 10, (2002) 177 - 206 LANDFORM STUDIES IN MOSEDALE, NORTHEASTERN LAKE DISTRICT: OPPORTUNITIES FOR FIELD INVESTIGATIONS RICHARD CLARK Parcey House, Hartsop, Penrith, Cumbria CA11 0NZ AND PETER WILSON School of Environmental Studies, University of Ulster at Coleraine, Cromore Road, Coleraine, Co. Londonderry BT52 1SA, Northern Ireland (e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT Mosedale is part of the valley of the River Caldew in the Skiddaw upland of the northeastern Lake District. It possesses a diverse, interesting and problematic assemblage of landforms and is convenient to Blencathra Field Centre. The landforms result from glacial, periglacial, fluvial and hillslopes processes and, although some of them have been described previously, others have not. Landforms of one time and environment occur adjacent to those of another. The area is a valuable locality for the field teaching and evaluation of upland geomorphology. In this paper, something of the variety of landforms, materials and processes is outlined for each district in turn. That is followed by suggestions for further enquiry about landform development in time and place. Some questions are posed. These should not be thought of as being the only relevant ones that might be asked about the area: they are intended to help set enquiry off. Mosedale offers a challenge to students at all levels and its landforms demonstrate a complexity that is rarely presented in the textbooks. INTRODUCTION Upland areas attract research and teaching in both earth and life sciences. In part, that is for the pleasure in being there and, substantially, for relative freedom of access to such features as landforms, outcrops and habitats, especially in comparison with intensively occupied lowland areas.
    [Show full text]
  • 2480 ± 90 +1850 8570 NPL-72. Mockerkin Tarn, West Cumberland
    [RADIOCARBON, VOL. 8, 1966, P. 340-347] NATIONAL PHYSICAL LABORATORY RADIOCARBON MEASUREMENTS IV I. HASSALL W. J. CALLOW, M. J. BAKER and GERALDINE National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, England The following list comprises measurements made since those re- ported in NPL III and is complete to the end of November 1965. Ages are relative to A.D. 1950 and are calculated using a half-life of 5568 yr. The measurements, corrected for fractionation (quoted 6013 values are relative to the P.D.B. standard), are referred to 0.950 times the activity of the NBS oxalic acid as contemporary reference standard. The quoted uncertainty is one standard deviation derived from a proper combination of the parameter variances as described in detail in NPL III. These variances are those of the standard and background measure- ments over a rolling twenty week period, of the sample C14 and 8013 measurements and of the de Vries effect (assumed to add an additional uncertainty equivalent to a standard deviation of 80 yr). Any uncertainty in the half-life has been excluded so that relative C14 ages may be cor- rectly compared. Absolute age assessments, however, should be made using the accepted best value for the half-life and the appropriate un- certainty then included. If the net sample count rate is less than 4 times the standard error of the difference between the sample and background count rates, a lower limit to the age is reported corresponding to a net sample count rate of 4 times the standard error of this difference. The description of each sample is based on information provided by the person submitting the sample to the laboratory.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of Macquarie Island. Introduction1
    Pacific Insects 4 (4) : 905-915 December, 15, 1962 INSECTS OF MACQUARIE ISLAND. INTRODUCTION1 By J. Linsley Gressitt BISHOP MUSEUM, HONOLULU Abstract: Collections of land arthropods were made on Macquarie Island by J. L. Gres­ sitt and J. H. Calaby, 4-10 December 1960, and by Keith Watson, December 1960-Decem- ber 1961. This paper is a brief discussion of the geography and environment of Macquarie, introductory to the systematic papers describing the fauna. Watson, of the Australian Na­ tional Antarctic Research Expeditions, will later publish his general ecological studies, when the species are all identified. INTRODUCTION This paper is a brief description of the geography and environment of Macquarie Is­ land, as related to land arthropods. It is presented by way of introduction to the series of reports by various specialists on the land arthropod fauna of the island. The bulk of these reports immediately follow this article. (One Macquarie mite is discussed in the third of the preceding articles by Wallwork on Antarctic mites, and another is mentioned in his second article.) Others will appear in later issues, when they are completed. After publication of the bulk of these taxonomic reports, Keith Watson will publish his general report on the land arthropod fauna of Macquarie, incorporating his ecological studies on the fauna. Through the kindness of Mr. P. G. Law, Director of the Antarctic Division, Australian Department of External Affairs, I was permitted to join the Australian National Antarctic Research Expedition for the annual resupply trip to Macquarie Island in early December 1960. The operation, supported by the chartered Danish ice-breaker Magga Dan, was car­ ried on at Macquarie from 4th to lOth December.
    [Show full text]
  • ITEX Discoveries
    Plant Response to Climate Change: Integration of ITEX Discoveries Proceedings from the 9th ITEX Meeting AEL REPORT 1 ARCTIC ECOLOGY LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY & PLANT PATHOLOGY MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY EAST LANSING, MI 48824 Plant Response to Climate Change: Integration of ITEX Discoveries Proceedings from the 9th ITEX Meeting Compiled and edited by Robert D. Hollister Suggested Citation: Hollister, R.D. (editor). 1999. Plant Response to Climate Change: Integration of ITEX Discoveries. Proceedings from the 9th ITEX Meeting January 5-9, 1999. Arctic Ecology Laboratory Report 1, Michigan State University. East Lansing, MI. 117 p. This Report is available from: The Arctic Ecology Laboratory Department of Botany & Plant Pathology Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824 Telephone: 517 432-2399 i Foreword This compilation from the 1999 meeting of the International Tundra Experiment (ITEX) held at Michigan State University (MSU) demonstrates the considerable progress made since the 1990 founding meeting of ITEX which was also held at MSU. In the intervening nine years ITEX has become an established and well-known project. It has been used as a model for related endeavors. This document is intended to serve as an update on ITEX activities and an encouragement for continued integration and cooperation in the study of tundra plant response, and the linked feedback of this response, to climate change. The ITEX Steering Committee and I wish to thank Bob Hollister for his unflagging efforts as Conference Coordinator and compiler and editor of this report. The meeting was made possible with funding from the United States National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs (grant number OPP 9714103).
    [Show full text]
  • Persistence of Carex Bigelowii–Racomitrium Lanuginosum Moss Heath Under Sheep Grazing in the Grampian Mountains, Scotland
    Article (refereed) - postprint Welch, David; Scott, David; Thompson, Des B.A. 2015. Persistence of Carex bigelowii–Racomitrium lanuginosum moss heath under sheep grazing in the Grampian Mountains, Scotland. Journal of Bryology, 37 (2). 96-103. 10.1179/1743282014Y.0000000127 Copyright © British Bryological Society 2014 This version available http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/511342/ NERC has developed NORA to enable users to access research outputs wholly or partially funded by NERC. Copyright and other rights for material on this site are retained by the rights owners. Users should read the terms and conditions of use of this material at http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/policies.html#access This document is the author’s final manuscript version of the journal article, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer review process. Some differences between this and the publisher’s version remain. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from this article. The definitive version is available at http://www.maneyonline.com/ Contact CEH NORA team at [email protected] The NERC and CEH trademarks and logos (‘the Trademarks’) are registered trademarks of NERC in the UK and other countries, and may not be used without the prior written consent of the Trademark owner. 1 Persistence of Carex bigelowii-Racomitrium lanuginosum moss heath under sheep 2 grazing in the Grampian Mountains, Scotland. 3 4 David Welch1, David Scott1 and Des B.A. Thompson2 5 1Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Edinburgh Research Station, Bush Estate, Penicuik, 6 Midlothian, EH26 0QB; 2Scottish Natural Heritage, Silvan House, 231 Corstorphine Road, 7 Edinburgh, EH12 7AT.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of Non- Native Species on the Invertebrates of Southern Ocean Islands
    Houghton, M., Terauds, A., Merritt, D., Driessen, M., Shaw, J. (2019). The impacts of non- native species on the invertebrates of Southern Ocean Islands. Journal of Insect Conservation Vol. 23, 435–452. The final publication is available at Springer via https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-019-00147- 9 THE IMPACTS OF NON-NATIVE SPECIES ON THE INVERTEBRATES OF SOUTHERN OCEAN ISLANDS Melissa Houghton, Aleks Terauds, David Merritt, Michael Driessen & Justine Shaw. ABSTRACT Isolation and climate have protected Southern Ocean Islands from non-native species. Relatively recent introductions have had wide-ranging, sometimes devastating, impacts across a range of species and ecosystems, including invertebrates, which are the main terrestrial fauna. In our comprehensive review, we found that despite the high abundance of non-native plants across the region, their impacts on native invertebrates are not well-studied and remain largely unknown. We highlight that non-native invertebrates are numerous and continue to arrive. Their impacts are multi-directional, including changing nutrient cycling regimes, establishing new functional guilds, out-competing native species, and mutually assisting spread of other non-native species. Non-native herbivorous and omnivorous vertebrates have caused declines in invertebrate habitat, but data that quantifies implications for invertebrates are rare. Predatory mammals not only indirectly effect invertebrates through predation of ecosystem engineers such as seabirds, but also directly shape community assemblages through invertebrate diet preferences and size-selective feeding. We found that research bias is not only skewed towards investigating impacts of mice, but is also focused more intensely on some islands, such as Marion Island, and towards some taxa, such as beetles and moths.
    [Show full text]
  • (Raphanus Sativus L.) Based on Comparative
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Insights into the species-specifc metabolic engineering of glucosinolates in radish (Raphanus Received: 10 January 2017 Accepted: 9 November 2017 sativus L.) based on comparative Published: xx xx xxxx genomic analysis Jinglei Wang1, Yang Qiu1, Xiaowu Wang1, Zhen Yue2, Xinhua Yang2, Xiaohua Chen1, Xiaohui Zhang1, Di Shen1, Haiping Wang1, Jiangping Song1, Hongju He3 & Xixiang Li1 Glucosinolates (GSLs) and their hydrolysis products present in Brassicales play important roles in plants against herbivores and pathogens as well as in the protection of human health. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of species-specifc GSLs and their hydrolysed products in Raphanus sativus L., we performed a comparative genomics analysis between R. sativus and Arabidopsis thaliana. In total, 144 GSL metabolism genes were identifed, and most of these GSL genes have expanded through whole-genome and tandem duplication in R. sativus. Crucially, the diferential expression of FMOGS-OX2 in the root and silique correlates with the diferential distribution of major aliphatic GSL components in these organs. Moreover, MYB118 expression specifcally in the silique suggests that aliphatic GSL accumulation occurs predominantly in seeds. Furthermore, the absence of the expression of a putative non-functional epithiospecifer (ESP) gene in any tissue and the nitrile- specifer (NSP) gene in roots facilitates the accumulation of distinctive benefcial isothiocyanates in R. sativus. Elucidating the evolution of the GSL metabolic pathway in R. sativus is important for fully understanding GSL metabolic engineering and the precise genetic improvement of GSL components and their catabolites in R. sativus and other Brassicaceae crops. Glucosinolates (GSLs), a large class of sulfur-rich secondary metabolites whose hydrolysis products display diverse bioactivities, function both in defence and as an attractant in plants, play a role in cancer prevention in humans and act as favour compounds1–4.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacier Lake, Saddle, & Blue Ice Trails
    Guide to Glacier Lake, Saddle, & Blue Ice Trails in Kachemak Bay State Park Trail Access: Glacier Spit, Saddle, or Humpy Creek Grewingk Tram Spur (1 mile, easy) Allowable Uses: Hiking This spur connects Glacier Distance: 3.2 mi one-way (Glacier Lake Trail) Lake Trail and Emerald Lake Loop Trail. There is a hand- 1.0 mi one way (Saddle Trail) operated cable car pulley 6.7 mi one-way (Glacier Spit to Blue Ice Trail end) system over Grewingk Elevation Gain: 200 ft (Glacier Lake Trail) Creek. Operation requires 200 ft (Glacier Lake to Saddle Trailhead) two people. Maximum capacity of the tram is 500 500 ft (Glacier Spit to Blue Ice Trail end) pounds. If only two people are crossing the Difficulty: Easy; family suitable (Glacier Lake Trail) tram, one person should stay behind and assist in Camping: Moderate (Saddle Trail) pulling the other across. Two people in the tram cart without assistance from others on the plat- Glacier Spit, Grewingk Glacier Lake, Grewingk Creek, Moderate (Blue Ice Trail) form is difficult. Gloves are helpful in operating Tarn Lake, Humpy Creek, Right Beach (accessible at Hiking Time: 1.5 hours (to end Glacier Lake Trail) low tide from Glacier Spit) the tram. 30 minutes (Saddle Trail) Water Availability: 5 hours (Glacier Spit to Blue Ice Trail end) Glacier Lake & Saddle Trails: Grewingk Creek (glacial), Grewingk Glacier Lake A Popular route joins the Saddle and Glacier Lake (glacial), small streams near glacier and on Saddle Tr. Blue Ice Trail: Trails. The Glacier Lake Trail follows flat terrain Safety and Considerations: This is the only developed access to Grewingk through stands of cottonwoods & spruce, and CAUTION: Unless properly trained and outfitted for Glacier.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 4 Appendices
    Part 4 Appendices HEARD ISLAND AND MCDONALD ISLANDS MARINE RESERVE 139 Appendix 1. Proclamation of Heard Island and McDonald Islands Marine Reserve 140 MANAGEMENT PLAN HEARD ISLAND AND MCDONALD ISLANDS MARINE RESERVE 141 142 MANAGEMENT PLAN Appendix 2. Native Fauna of the HIMI Marine Reserve Listed Under the EPBC Act Scientific Name Common Name Birds recorded as breeding Aptenodytes patagonicus king penguin S Catharacta lonnbergi subantarctic skua S Daption capense cape petrel S Diomeda exulans wandering albatross V S M B J A Diomeda melanophrys black–browed albatross S M B A Eudyptes chrysocome southern rockhopper penguin S Eudyptes chrysolophus macaroni penguin S Larus dominicanus kelp gull S Macronectes giganteus southern giant petrel E S M B A Oceanites oceanicus Wilson’s storm petrel S M J Pachyptila crassirostris fulmar prion S Pachyptila desolata Antarctic prion S Pelecanoides georgicus South Georgian diving petrel S Pelecanoides urinatrix common diving petrel S Phalacrocorax atriceps (e) Heard Island cormorant V S Phoebetria palpebrata light mantled sooty albatross S M B A Pygoscelis papua gentoo penguin S Sterna vittata Antarctic tern V S Non–breeding birds Catharacta maccormicki south polar skua S M J Diomedea epomophora southern royal albatross V S M B A Fregetta grallaria white–bellied storm petrel S Fregetta tropica black–bellied storm petrel S Fulmarus glacialoides southern fulmar S Garrodia nereis grey–backed storm petrel S Halobaena caerulea blue petrel V S Macronectes halli northern giant petrel V S M B A Pachyptila belcheri
    [Show full text]