Rainwater Basin Joint Venture Waterfowl Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rainwater Basin Joint Venture Waterfowl Plan Rainwater Basin Joint Venture Waterfowl Plan A regional contribution to the North American Waterfowl Management Plan and the Rainwater Basin Joint Venture Implementation Plan By the Rainwater Basin Joint Venture Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... i Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 The RWBJV Administrative Area .............................................................................................................. 2 Geographic Focus Areas in the RWBJV Administrative Area ............................................................... 2 Central Loess Hills ............................................................................................................................. 4 Central and North Platte River ........................................................................................................... 5 Missouri River .................................................................................................................................... 7 Northeast Prairies/Elkhorn River ........................................................................................................ 8 Rainwater Basin ................................................................................................................................. 9 Republican River/Blue River Drainages and Loess Canyons ........................................................... 10 Sandhills ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Verdigris-Bazile Creek Drainages .................................................................................................... 12 Continental Priority Waterfowl Species .................................................................................................... 12 Priority Waterfowl Species for the RWBJV Administrative Area ............................................................ 13 Population Objectives ........................................................................................................................... 15 Non-breeding Waterfowl Population Objectives .............................................................................. 15 Breeding Waterfowl Population Objectives ..................................................................................... 15 Wetland Habitat .................................................................................................................................... 16 Non-breeding Waterfowl Habitat ..................................................................................................... 16 Breeding Waterfowl Habitat ............................................................................................................. 18 Conservation Design ................................................................................................................................. 18 Non-breeding Waterfowl ...................................................................................................................... 18 Central Platte River Conservation Targets and Strategies ................................................................ 20 RWB Conservation Targets and Strategies....................................................................................... 20 Breeding Waterfowl ............................................................................................................................. 22 Sandhills Conservation Targets and Strategies ................................................................................. 24 Conservation Delivery .............................................................................................................................. 24 Research and Monitoring .......................................................................................................................... 25 Non-breeding Populations .................................................................................................................... 25 Breeding Populations............................................................................................................................ 26 Summary................................................................................................................................................... 26 Appendix A............................................................................................................................................... 28 Energetic Requirements of Migratory Waterfowl Using the Rainwater Basin Region ......................... 28 Population Objectives for the Rainwater Basin during Spring Migration ............................................. 29 Residency Time .................................................................................................................................... 33 Daily Energetic Requirements by Species ............................................................................................ 34 Total Estimated Energetic Requirements from Wetland Habitats..................................................... 36 Appendix B ............................................................................................................................................... 42 Developing Conservation Strategies for Wetlands within the Rainwater Basin.................................... 42 Public Wetlands ............................................................................................................................... 44 Private Long-term Conservation Lands ............................................................................................ 47 Private Short-term Conservation Lands ............................................................................................ 49 Privately owned, Non-program Wetlands......................................................................................... 51 Appendix C ............................................................................................................................................... 55 Restoring Hydrologic Functions by Filling Water Concentration Pits .................................................. 55 Methodology Used ........................................................................................................................... 55 Appendix D............................................................................................................................................... 58 Protecting Wetland Function with Vegetative Buffer Zones ................................................................ 58 Calculating Upland Buffer Acreages ................................................................................................ 58 Appendix E ............................................................................................................................................... 61 Common and Scientific Nomenclature for Species Described in the RWBJV Waterfowl Plan ............ 61 Literature Cited ......................................................................................................................................... 63 List of Figures Figure 1. Geographic Focus Areas in the Rainwater Basin Joint Venture Administrative Area.................. 3 Figure 2. Wetland diversity in the Nebraska Sandhills, based on a moving window analysis at 3km (1.86 mi) radius. ........................................................................................................................................ 23 Figure 3. Density of semi-permanent emergent wetlands and Sandhills lakes for a habitat selection model identifying possible Trumpeter Swan nesting areas. ...................................................................... 24 Appendix A Figure A-1 Traditional Survey Area (TSA) surveyed annually to estimate waterfowl breeding populations (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2012). .................................................................................. 29 Figure A-2. Approximate range of North America goose populations migrating through the Rainwater Basin region of Nebraska (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2012). ........................................... 31 List of Tables Table 1. Wetland and grassland acres and their distribution by Geographic Focus Area (Bishop et al. 2009). .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Table 2. Priority species identified by the North American Waterfowl Management Plan that are found in the Rainwater Basin Joint Venture Administrative Area, and their conservation priority within Waterfowl Conservation Region 19 (NAWMP 2004). .................................................................. 14 Table 3. Current and projected targets for wetland acres and kilocalories provided by natural plant communities for spring-migrating waterfowl in the Rainwater Basin region of Nebraska. ....................... 22 Table 4. Current and projected targets for wetland ponding frequency and occurrence of early- succession plant communities in the Rainwater Basin region of Nebraska. .............................................. 22 Appendix A Table A-1. Continental population
Recommended publications
  • Pocket Guide to Hydric Soils for Wetland Delineations In
    The Buzzards Bay National Estuary Program Buzzards Bay National Estuary Program 2870 Cranberry Highway East Wareham, MA 02538 Pocket Guide to Hydric Soils #508-291-3625 x 14 www.buzzardsbay.org for Wetland Delineations in Massachusetts Version 2.1 The Buzzards Bay National Estuary Program November, 2014 This document is a compilation of material taken from Delineating Bordering Vegetated Appendix G – Observing and Recording Hue, Value and Chroma Wetlands under the Wetlands Protection Act, published by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Wetlands, and Waterways and the Regional All colors noted in this Booklet refer to moist Munsell® colors (Gretag/Macbeth 2000). Do not attempt to determine colors while wearing sunglasses or tinted lenses. Colors must be determined Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and under natural light and not under artificial light. Northeast Region (Version 2.0), published by the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Chroma Soil colors specified in the ACOE indicators do not have decimal points (except for indicator A12); This document also includes excerpts from the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the however, intermediate colors do occur between Munsell chips. Soil color should not be rounded to United States, A Guide for Identifying and Delineation Hydric Soils, Version 7.0, qualify as meeting an indicator. For example, a soil matrix with a chroma between 2 and 3 should including the 2013 Errata, as well as Field Indicators for Identifying Hydric Soils in New be recorded as having a chroma of 2+. This soil material does not have a chroma of 2 and would England, 3rd ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States Natural Resources a Guide for Identifying and Delineating Conservation Service Hydric Soils, Version 7.0, 2010
    United States In cooperation with Department of the National Technical Agriculture Committee for Hydric Soils Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States Natural Resources A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Conservation Service Hydric Soils, Version 7.0, 2010 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils, Version 7.0, 2010 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Edited by L.M. Vasilas, Soil Scientist, NRCS, Washington, DC; G.W. Hurt, Soil Scientist, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; and C.V. Noble, Soil Scientist, USACE, Vicksburg, MS ii The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Copies of this publication can be obtained from: NRCS National Publications and Forms Distribution Center LANDCARE 1-888-LANDCARE (888-526-3227) [email protected] Information contained in this publication and additional information concerning hydric soils are maintained on the Web site at http://soils.usda.gov/use/hydric/.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Indicators of Hydric Soils
    United States Department of Field Indicators of Agriculture Natural Resources Hydric Soils in the Conservation Service United States In cooperation with A Guide for Identifying and Delineating the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Hydric Soils, Version 8.2, 2018 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils Version 8.2, 2018 (Including revisions to versions 8.0 and 8.1) United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Edited by L.M. Vasilas, Soil Scientist, NRCS, Washington, DC; G.W. Hurt, Soil Scientist, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; and J.F. Berkowitz, Soil Scientist, USACE, Vicksburg, MS ii In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Collection Requirements and Procedures for Mapping Wetland, Deepwater, and Related Habitats of the United States (Version 3)
    Data Collection Requirements and Procedures for Mapping Wetland, Deepwater, and Related Habitats of the United States (version 3) U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE - ECOLOGICAL SERVICES DIVISION OF BUDGET AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT BRANCH OF GEOSPATIAL MAPPING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT FALLS CHURCH, VA 2204 REVISED JULY 2020 1 Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the following individuals for their support and contributions: Bill Kirchner, USFWS, Region 1, Portland, OR; Elaine Blok, USFWS, Region 8, Portland, OR Brian Huberty, USFWS, Region 3, Twin Cities, MN; Ralph Tiner, USFWS, Region 5, Hadley, MA: Kevin Bon, USFWS, Region 6, Denver, CO; Jerry Tande, USFWS, Region 7, Anchorage, AK; Julie Michaelson, USFWS, Region 7, Anchorage, AK; Norm Mangrum, USFWS, St. Petersburg, FL; Dennis Fowler, USFWS, St. Petersburg, FL; Jim Terry, USFWS, St. Petersburg, FL; Martin Kodis, USFWS, Chief - Branch of Resources and Mapping Support, Washington, D.C. and David J. Stout, USFWS, Chief - Division of Habitat and Resource Conservation, Washington, D.C. Peer review was provided by the following subject matter experts: Dr. Shawna Dark and Danielle Bram, California State University - Northridge. Robb Macleod, Ducks Unlimited, Great Lakes and Atlantic Regional Office, Ann Arbor, MI; Michael Kjellson, Dept. Wildlife and Fisheries, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD; and Deborah (Jane) Awl, Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, TN. This document may be referenced as: Dahl, T.E., J. Dick, J. Swords, and B.O. Wilen. 2020. Data Collection Requirements and Procedures for Mapping Wetland, Deepwater and Related Habitats of the United States. Division of Habitat and Resource Conservation (version 3), National Wetlands Inventory, Madison, WI. 91 p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Light Microscopist's Diatom Glossary by D
    The Light Microscopist’s Diatom Glossary 2nd Ed. The Light Microscopist's Diatom Glossary by D. S. Gill 1st Ed. August 2006 2nd Ed. June 2011 All rights reserved Preface to 2nd Edition The previous Edition of this publication contained a number of formatting errors for which I apologise. Most, if not all, of these have been corrected in this edition. It has been determined that two new term categories should be introduced – Hydrological terms and Oceanographic terms - as references to both these disciplines are frequently found in publications and also associated with samples. There is also a growing tendency in papers to include words or terms under the banner of Ecology. These terms have been included where it is felt appropriate. Some readers have also pointed out that the plethora of older texts in languages other than English cause some problems to those of us who are monolingual. Thus, a section relating to German and French terms is to be included in later editions, but will not be as extensive as the current English Glossary. It has become increasingly clear that whilst many of the the relatively older terms have fallen into disuse they were used more or less consistently throughout texts of their time. The same, however, cannot be said for more modern terms where usage and interpretation are sometimes at significant variance one with another. This being the case I have included the disparate descriptions where such seems appropriate. Modern academic papers relating to the Diatomaceae use less of the older terms but have introduced other ‘vogue’ terms, equally confusing to those outside academia or not steeped in a specific discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentation of Nebraska's Playa Wetlands
    SEDIMENTATION OF NEBRASKA’S PLAYA WETLANDS A Review of Current Knowledge and Issues “Soil erosion is as old as agriculture. It began when the first heavy rain struck the first furrow turned by a crude implement of tillage in the hands of prehistoric man. It has been going on ever since, wherever man’s culture of the earth has bared the soil to rain and wind.” -H.H. Bennett and W.C. Lowdermilk, circa 1930s 2 SEDIMENTATION OF NEBRASKA’S PLAYA WETLANDS A Review of Current Knowledge and Issues By: Ted LaGrange, Wetland Program Manager Nebraska Game & Parks Commission Wetlands Program 2200 N 33rd Street Lincoln, NE 68503 Randy Stutheit, Wetland Biologist Nebraska Game & Parks Commission Wetlands Program 2200 N 33rd Street Lincoln, NE 68503 Michael Gilbert, Wetland Ecologist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Omaha District 1616 Capitol Ave. Omaha, NE 68102 Dan Shurtliff, Assistant State Soil Scientist USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service Nebraska State Office 100 Centennial Mall North Lincoln, NE 68508 P. Michael Whited, Senior Regional Soil Scientist Region 10 Soil Survey USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service 375 Jackson Street, Ste 600 St Paul, MN 55101 August 2011 Published by Nebraska Game & Parks Commission (NGPC), Lincoln Suggested Citation: LaGrange, T.G., R. Stutheit, M. Gilbert, D. Shurtliff, and P.M. Whited. 2011. Sedimentation of Nebraska’s Playa Wetlands: A Review of Current Knowledge and Issues. Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln. 62 pages. Cover Photo: Sediment washed into the temporary zone of a wetland 3 miles east and 1 north of Harvard, Neb. after a spring thunderstorm, April 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Pocket Guide to Hydric Soils for Wetland Delineations in Massachusetts
    The Buzzards Bay National Estuary Program Pocket Guide to Hydric Soils for Wetland Delineations in Massachusetts Version 4.1 The Buzzards Bay National Estuary Program June, 2019 This document is a compilation of material taken from Delineating Bordering Vegetated Wetlands under the Wetlands Protection Act, published by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Wetlands, and Waterways and the Field Indicators for Identifying Hydric Soils in New England, Version 4, April 2019. Field Indicators for Identifying Hydric Soils in New England, Version 4, April 2019, has superseded Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and Northeast Region (Version 2.0), Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, A Guide for Identifying and Delineation Hydric Soils, Version 8.2, and Field Indicators for Identifying Hydric Soils in New England, Version 3 for use in wetland delineations in New England. The Buzzards Bay National Estuary Program recommends the practitioner to download and read Field Indicators for Identifying Hydric Soils in New England, Version 4, April, 2019. This document is meant to be a companion to “The Buzzards Bay National Estuary Program Pocket Guide to Delineating Wetlands,” available at the Buzzards Bay National Estuary Program website, www.buzzardsbay.org. This update includes the “Errata for Companion Guide to Field Indicators for Identifying Hydric Soils in New England: TA-6 to A-17” (November 2018) and the revisions reflected in Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, A Guide for Identifying and Delineation Hydric Soils, Version 8.2 (2018) Special thanks to Peter Fletcher for tips regarding the arrangement of the initial version of the booklet.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland Soils Importance of Wetland Soils • Chemical Transformations • Chemical (Nutrient) Storage These Affect Plant Growth and Peat Formation
    Wetland Soils Importance of wetland soils • Chemical transformations • Chemical (nutrient) storage These affect plant growth and peat formation Lecture outline: • What are soils? • How does inundation change upland soils into hydric soils? • What are the important distinguishing characteristics of hydric soils? • What are the implications of the unique characteristics of hydric soils for plants and chemical transformations? What are soils? _________ = study of the components and formation of soils Soil mapping is done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), a branch of the USDA. Soil Definitions: • Early definition of soil: the material capable of supporting the growth of land plants. • A natural body comprised of solids (minerals and organic matter), liquid, and gases that occurs on the land surface, occupies space, and is characterized by one or more of the following: horizons, or layers, that are distinguishable from the initial material as a result of additions, losses, transfers, and transformations of energy or the ability to support rooted plants in a natural environment. (Soil Survey Staff 1998) What are NOT soils? • Bedrock • Rocky outcrops & plateaus • Salt flats • Sand beaches and sand bars • Muddy shores • Unconsolidated material lacking any vegetation cover •Permanently flooded bottoms (this is SUBSTRATE) Can you have a wetland if you don’t have soil? Tiner 1999: “Tidal mud flats, sandy intertidal beaches, and rocky shores are examples of nonvegetated wetlands occurring on nonsoils.” Soil Types Two main types of soil: organic and mineral % C = half the amount of % organic material, ~ > 40% organic material by weight Organic matter must be 40 cm for a soil to be a histosol (organic soil); otherwise, it is a mineral soil with an organic layer (horizon) on the top.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland and Hydric Soils 6 Carl C
    Wetland and Hydric Soils 6 Carl C. Trettin, Randall K. Kolka, Anne S. Marsh, Sheel Bansal, Erik A. Lilleskov, Patrick Megonigal, Marla J. Stelk, Graeme Lockaby, David V. D’Amore, Richard A. MacKenzie, Brian Tangen, Rodney Chimner, and James Gries Introduction conterminous United States have been converted to other land uses over the past 150 years (Dahl 1990). Most of those losses Soil and the inherent biogeochemical processes in wetlands are due to draining and conversion to agriculture. States in the contrast starkly with those in upland forests and rangelands. The Midwest such as Iowa, Illinois, Missouri, Ohio, and Indiana differences stem from extended periods of anoxia, or the lack of have lost more than 85% of their original wetlands, and oxygen in the soil, that characterize wetland soils; in contrast, California has lost 96% of its wetlands. In the mid-1900s, the upland soils are nearly always oxic. As a result, wetland soil importance of wetlands in the landscape started to be under- biogeochemistry is characterized by anaerobic processes, and stood, and wetlands are now recognized for their inherent wetland vegetation exhibits specifc adaptations to grow under value that is realized through the myriad of ecosystem ser- these conditions. However, many wetlands may also have peri- vices, including storage of water to mitigate fooding, fltering ods during the year where the soils are unsaturated and aerated. water of pollutants and sediment, storing and sequestering car- This fuctuation between aerated and nonaerated soil condi- bon (C), providing critical habitat for wildlife, and recreation. tions, along with the specialized vegetation, gives rise to a wide Historically, drainage of wetlands for agricultural devel- variety of highly valued ecosystem services.
    [Show full text]
  • Pocket Guide to Hydric Soils for Wetland Delineations in Massachusetts
    The Buzzards Bay National Estuary Program Pocket Guide to Hydric Soils for Wetland Delineations in Massachusetts The Buzzards Bay National Estuary Program September, 2013 This document is largely taken from Delineating Bordering Vegetated Wetlands under the Wetlands Protection Act, published by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Wetlands and Waterways and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and Northeast Region (Version 2.0), published by the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. This document also includes information from the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, A Guide for Identifying and Delineation Hydric Soils, Version 7.0, including the 2013 Errata, as well as Field Indicators for Identifying Hydric Soils in New England, 3rd ed. This document is meant to be a companion to “The Buzzards Bay National Estuary Program Pocket Guide to Delineating Wetlands,” available at the Buzzards Bay National Estuary Program website, www.buzzardsbay.org. Unless otherwise noted, photos are from the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and Northeast Region (Version 2.0). Table of Contents Preface ................................................................................. i DEP Short List …………....................................................... 1 1. Histosols ………............................................................. 2 2. Histic Epipedon .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Colony Pump Station and Force Main Project Biological Resources Evaluation
    Ocean Colony Pump Station and Force Main Project Biological Resources Evaluation HALF MOON BAY, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Ben L. Shick Shaaf and Wheeler 411 Russell Avenue Santa Rosa, California, 95403 WRA Contacts: Leslie Lazarotti [email protected] Ellie Knecht [email protected] Date: May 2017 Updated June 2018 WRA Project No. 26325 2169-G East Francisco Blvd., San Rafael, CA 94702 (415) 454-8868 tel [email protected] www.wra-ca.com This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Description of the Study Area ..................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Description ...................................................................................................... 1 2.0 REGULATORY BACKGROUND .......................................................................................... 3 2.1 Sensitive Biological Communities ............................................................................... 3 2.2 Federal Jurisdiction over Wetlands and “Other Waters” .............................................. 4 2.3 State Jurisdiction over Wetlands and “Other Waters” .................................................. 5 2.3.1 State Water Resources Control Board and Regional Water Quality Control Board ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.3.2
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland Soils, Hydrology and Geomorphology
    TWO Wetland Soils, Hydrology, and Geomorphology C. RHETT JACKSON, JAMES A. THOMPSON, and RANDALL K. KOLKA WETLAND SOILS Percolation Landscape Position Groundwater Flow Soil Properties Variable Source Area Runoff or Saturated Surface Runoff Soil Profiles Summary of Hillslope Flow Process Soil Processes WETLAND WATER BUDGETS Legal Differentiation of Wetland Soils HYDROPATTERNS HILLSLOPE AND WETLAND HYDROLOGY Hillslope Hydrologic Processes WETLAND HYDRAULICS AND RESIDENCE TIME Interception Infiltration, Soil Physics, and Soil Water Storage GEOMORPHIC CONTROLS ON WETLAND HYDROLOGY Overland Flow EFFECTS OF LAND USE ON WETLAND HYDROLOGY Evapotranspiration Interflow The hydrology, soils, and watershed processes of a wetland and chemical behavior of soils, creating a special class of all interact with vegetation and animals over time to cre- soils known as hydric soils. The hydric soils in turn alter ate the dynamic physical template upon which a wetland’s the movement of water and solutes through the wetland ecosystem is based (Fig. 2.1). With respect to many ecosys- system. The soil is where many of the hydrologic and bio- tem processes, the physical factors defining a wetland envi- geochemical processes that influence wetland function ronment at any particular time are often treated as inde- and ecology occur. A complete understanding of wetland pendent variables, but in fact none of these variables are hydrology, wetland formation, wetland ecology, and wet- independent of the others. For example, the hydropattern land management requires a basic understanding of soils— of a wetland (the time series of water levels) is often consid- including soil properties, soil processes, and soil variabil- ered a master variable that affects the soils, biogeochem- ity— and of the hydrologic processes that control wetland istry, and biology of a wetland, but the hydropattern is in systems.
    [Show full text]