Clearwire Completes Transaction with Sprint Nextel and $3.2 Billion Investment to Launch 4G Mobile Internet Company
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Home from Xohm? | Wireless Week 7/30/10 1:37 PM
Analysis - Home from Xohm? | Wireless Week 7/30/10 1:37 PM Analysis - Home from Xohm? By Keith Mallinson Friday, August 31, 2007 Xohm may offer impressive data speeds, but will Sprint and Clearwire be able to match the speed in building out coverage? Sprint, in partnership with Clearwire, boasts support from Google and emerging WiMAX technology vendors Intel, Motorola, Nokia and Samsung. Making a success of it will demand residential broadband customers. Consequently, Sprint’s Internet-styled Xohm service, due for launch in 2008, will be in conflict with Pivot and Sprint’s cable TV partners in this joint venture. WiMAX’s key challenge is in establishing high-volume demand for equipment and services. Infrastructure market leader Ericsson focuses on 3GPP standards for next-generation mobile wireless because it needs substantial equipment volumes to impact its high market share and to drive down costs. GSM has 2.1 billion subscribers; W- CDMA/HSDPA has 130 million, growing at an annual rate of 70%. In contrast, the WiMAX Forum’s Website references SenzaFiliConsulting’s forecast of just 54 million WiMAX subscribers by 2012. That will be equivalent to only about 1% of the world’s mobile subscriber base that year. WiMAX infrastructure and device vendors face formidable competition. Getting the mobile variant of WiMAX – 802.11e – standardized, interoperable and commercially available is no mean feat, but the challenge is broader. Other emerging technologies including HSDPA/HSPA or LTE, and EV-DO Rev B or UMB have similar performance capabilities as mobile WiMAX and benefit from an existing base of mobile users on related technologies and networks that can ensure broad network coverage and availability. -
Uva-F-1143 Mccaw Cellular Communications: the At&T
UVA-F-1143 Version 2.2 MCCAW CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS: THE AT&T/MCCAW MERGER NEGOTIATION In September 1992, Craig O. McCaw, the founder and CEO of McCaw Cellular Communications, mused about the recent discussions he had engaged in with Robert Allen, chair and CEO of AT&T. Allen had approached McCaw regarding a possible partnership. Such a deal would enable AT&T to enter the wireless industry and at the same time provide McCaw Cellular Communications, Inc., with sorely needed capital to exploit its cellular operating licenses. McCaw had sacrificed much of its financial flexibility in its hostile takeover of LIN Broadcasting in 1990 and now was saddled with over $5 billion in debt, which had depleted cash reserves and reduced net income. A potential offer from AT&T, the global telecommunications powerhouse, intrigued Craig McCaw as he reflected on the difficult road he and his family had traveled in growing the family-run cable operation into the nation’s leading cellular service provider. McCaw considered the possible reasons why AT&T was pursuing McCaw Cellular. One reason might have been that AT&T sold cellular phones but offered no cellular service, while McCaw offered cellular service, but sold no equipment. Or perhaps it was future access to personal communications system (PCS), the next generation in wireless technology. Or maybe it was McCaw Cellular’s existing seamless wireless national network for voice and data transmissions, a network behind which AT&T could throw its brand name, databanks, marketing clout, and technical expertise. A deal between those two firms would offer to McCaw AT&T’s undisputed expertise in the industry and its global marketing and sales force power to expand its overseas presence. -
Mccaw/AT&T History
McCaw/AT&T History Key Dates: 1984: The first cellular systems are built in Chicago and Washington, D.C. 1987: Craig McCaw sells his cable television assets to focus on wireless business. 1989: McCaw Cellular Communications acquires LIN Broadcasting. 1992: AT&T Corp. acquires 33 percent of McCaw Cellular Communications. 1994: AT&T Corp. and McCaw Cellular Communications merge. 1998: AT&T Wireless Group introduces Digital One Rate. 2001: AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. is spun off as a separate company. Company History: AT&T Wireless, Inc. is the third largest provider of wireless and data services for consumers and businesses in the United States. Through licenses with the Federal Communications Commission, AT&T Wireless has the potential to serve 99 percent of the U.S. population based on the territory covered by its licenses. The company serves more than 20 million subscribers. Through AT&T Wireless's WorldConnect service, subscribers can expect service in more than 100 countries in the Americas, Australia, Asia, and Europe. Origins Although AT&T Wireless's corporate roots sprouted from McCaw Cellular Communications, wireless technology was first developed under the aegis of AT&T Corp. It was a case of a company pioneering a technology and later being forced to buy its way into a business it had first developed. In 1947, AT&T Bell Laboratories engineers invented cellular phone service specifically for law enforcement. Police departments were having trouble staying in contact with their patrol cars. At the time, police departments and patrol cars communicated with each other through radio frequencies, but during periods of high use, the system collapsed. -
Wireless Evolution •..••••.•.•...•....•.•..•.•••••••...••••••.•••.••••••.••.•.••.••••••• 4
Department of Justice ,"'''''''''<11 Bureau of Investigation ,Operational Technology Division WIRELESS EVDLUTIDN IN THIS Iselil-it:: .. WIRELESS EVOLUTIDN I!I TECH BYTES • LONG TERM EVOLUTIQN ill CLDUD SERVICES • 4G TECHNOLOGY ill GESTURE-RECOGNITION • FCC ON BROADBAND • ACTIVITY-BASED NAVIGATION 'aw PUIi! I' -. q f. 8tH'-.1 Waa 8RI,. (!.EIi/RiW81 R.d-nl)) - 11 - I! .el " Ij MESSAGE FROM MANAGEMENT b7E he bou~~aries of technology are constantly expanding. develop technical tools to combat threats along the Southwest Recognizing the pathway of emerging technology is Border. a key element to maintaining relevance in a rapidly changing technological environment. While this The customer-centric approach calls for a high degree of T collaboration among engineers, subject matter experts (SMEs), proficiency is fundamentally important in developing strategies that preserve long-term capabilities in the face of emerging and the investigator to determine needs and requirements. technologies, equally important is delivering technical solutions To encourage innovation, the technologists gain a better to meet the operational needs of the law enforcement understanding of the operational and investigative needs customer in a dynamic 'threat' environment. How can technical and tailor the technology to fit the end user's challenges. law enforcement organizations maintain the steady-state Rather than developing solutions from scratch, the customer production of tools and expertise for technical collection, while centric approach leverages and modifies the technoloe:v to infusing ideas and agility into our organizations to improve our fit the customer's nFlFlrt~.1 ability to deliver timely, relevant, and cutting edge tools to law enforcement customers? Balancing these two fundamentals through an effective business strategy is both a challenge and an opportunity for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and other Federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. -
Wimax Promises True Mobile Wireless Broadband Service
July 14, 2008 WiMAX Promises True Mobile Wireless Broadband Service Wi-Fi technology has revolutionized the way that people use the Internet by allowing for a convenient and (most of the time) easy-to-use wireless connection to laptop computers and other portable devices. A new type of wireless service, called “WiMAX” (for Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access), promises to provide a much improved wireless Internet experience (compared to Wi-Fi) and will even support a true mobile, in- motion connectivity for users in automobiles as well as a true Internet- based wireless broadcast service. A comparison of some of the key parameters of Wi-Fi and WiMAX is shown in the table below. WiMAX comes in two “flavors,” fixed (IEEE standard 802.16-2004) and mobile (802.16e-2005). While fixed WiMAX services offer an alternative to wired Internet service to the home, mobile WiMAX will provide a broadband cellular phone-like service operating multiple times faster than so-called “3G” cellular networks which offer connection speeds from 144 kbps to 2.4 Mbps (3G is currently supported in the U.S. by a number of cellular service providers including AT&T, Sprint/Nextel, TMobile and Verizon). With embedded mobile WiMAX chipsets in laptops, phones, PDAs, mobile Internet devices and consumer electronic equipment, mobile WiMAX technology is expected to allow users to wirelessly access a range of multimedia applications, such as live videoconferencing, recorded video, games, large data files and more, anywhere within the WiMAX network coverage area. In addition, the Mobile WiMAX standard includes a Multicast and Broadcast Service (MBS) specification designed to support a broadcast (i.e. -
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-04721 SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) KANSAS 48 -0457967 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 6200 Sprint Parkway, Overland Park, Kansas 66251 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 829-0965 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Series 1 common stock, $2.00 par value New York Stock Exchange Guarantees of Sprint Capital Corporation 6.875% Notes due 2028 New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. -
Clearwire Frequently Asked Questions
Clearwire Frequently Asked Questions What is Clearwire (www.clearwire.com) • Clearwire is a provider of simple, portable, fast and reliable wireless Internet access and services. • Clearwire utilizes a next-generation, non-line-of-sight wireless broadband network technology. • Founded by telecom pioneer Craig McCaw in October 2003, Clearwire is a publicly held company (Nasdaq: CLWR) and is headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. What is Clearwire service? Clearwire provides a simple, “off-the-shelf” wireless high-speed Internet solution. Establishing Clearwire service involves a plug-and-play installation — no need for a technician to configure additional hardware. Customers can establish an Internet connection in minutes. Customers use Clearwire to connect to the Internet using licensed spectrum, thus eliminating the confines of traditional cable or phone wiring. The tower equipment transmits radio signals from a base site to a small, wireless modem the size of a paperback book, or a pc card which easily connects a user’s computer to the Internet. The portable Clearwire service can be moved from place-to-place inside Clearwire’s coverage area, which allows customers to use the service throughout their home, office or favorite coffee house. Clearwire launched its VoIP (voice over internet protocol) service on April 10, 2006. The company currently offers Clearwire Internet Phone Service in 37 markets across the United States. Is Clearwire similar to a Wi-Fi hot spot? Clearwire’s technology goes beyond what the typical Wi-Fi hot spot provides. Clearwire either owns or leases the spectrum over which it broadcasts its signal, providing a high-quality connection not subject to interference, and a secure portal not available when using the Internet in a hot spot. -
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Implementation of Section 6002(b) of ) the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation ) Act of 1993 ) WT Docket No. 09-66 ) Annual Report and Analysis of ) Competitive Market Conditions With ) Respect to Commercial Mobile Services ) COMMENTS OF CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION® Michael Altschul Senior Vice President and General Counsel Christopher Guttman-McCabe Vice President, Regulatory Affairs Robert F. Roche, Ph.D. Vice President, Research David J. Redl Counsel, Regulatory Affairs CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION® 1400 Sixteenth Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 785-0081 Dated: June 15, 2009 SUMMARY Competition is flourishing among facilities-based CMRS carriers and through intermodal competition with other providers. In the remarkably competitive wireless market, carriers differentiate themselves through network reliability and coverage as well as through new service offerings, pricing plans and enhanced handset options. The American economy in general, and customers specifically, are enjoying the benefits of this environment. Prices continue to drop. As CTIA described in a recent filing, the price per minute in the United States is the lowest of the 26 OECD countries measured. Further, the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index measurement for the U.S. wireless industry is also the lowest of the 26 countries. Output and investment remain strong even in the face of an economic downturn and high subscriber penetration. Players in the wireless industry strive to attract new customers while keeping current subscribers satisfied by offering quality service at affordable prices as well as meeting consumer demand for advanced wireless services. In short, all segments of the wireless industry – carriers, manufacturers and application developers – are aggressively competitive. -
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-04721 SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) KANSAS 48 -0457967 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 6200 Sprint Parkway, Overland Park, Kansas 66251 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 829-0965 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Series 1 common stock, $2.00 par value New York Stock Exchange Guarantees of Sprint Capital Corporation 6.875% Notes due 2028 New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. -
A National Broadband Plan for Our Future: a Customer-Centric Framework
International Journal of Communication 3 (2009), 742-779 1932-8036/20090742 A National Broadband Plan for Our Future: A Customer-Centric Framework GERALD R. FAULHABER* Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania and Penn Law School Congress has recently charged the Federal Communications Commission to establish a National Broadband Plan. This paper argues that a customer-centric plan, which puts the customer in control of decision-making, will yield the best broadband result for the U.S. The Federal government must establish a market infrastructure that encourages competition, requires transparency of both network providers and application providers, and includes vigorous antitrust enforcement. Competition from wireless broadband is present now and will become far more prevalent shortly, on the basis of current and announced investment plans. Regulators must also make available far more licensed spectrum to ensure this competition is realized. Calls for regulation in the form of mandated unbundling and more unlicensed spectrum are regulatory cul-de-sacs with proven track records of failure. Calls for regulatory control of network provider practices (other than transparency), such as network neutrality, are misguided. Such decisions are best left to customers, who can very well decide for themselves which of the broadband providers offer terms that best suit the customer. Introduction By the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act,1 the U.S. Congress tasked the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to create a national broadband plan and -
60Th-Anniversary-Boo
HORATIO ALGER ASSOCIATION of DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS, INC. A SIXTY-YEAR HISTORY Ad Astra Per Aspera – To the Stars Through Difficulties 1947 – 2007 Craig R. Barrett James A. Patterson Louise Herrington Ornelas James R. Moffett Leslie T. Welsh* Thomas J. Brokaw Delford M. Smith Darrell Royal John C. Portman, Jr. Benjy F. Brooks* Jenny Craig Linda G. Alvarado Henry B. Tippie John V. Roach Robert C. Byrd Sid Craig Wesley E. Cantrell Herbert F. Boeckmann, II Kenny Rogers Gerald R. Ford, Jr. Craig Hall John H. Dasburg Jerry E. Dempsey Art Buchwald Paul Harvey Clarence Otis, Jr. Archie W. Dunham Joe L. Dudley, Sr. S. Truett Cathy Thomas W. Landry* Richard M. Rosenberg Bill Greehey Ruth Fertel* Robert H. Dedman* Ruth B. Love David M. Rubenstein Chuck Hagel Quincy Jones Julius W. Erving J. Paul Lyet* Howard Schultz James V. Kimsey Dee J. Kelly Daniel K. Inouye John H. McConnell Roger T. Staubach Marvin A. Pomerantz John Pappajohn Jean Nidetch Fred W. O’Green* Christ Thomas Sullivan Franklin D. Raines Don Shula Carl R. Pohlad Willie Stargell* Kenneth Eugene Behring Stephen C. Schott Monroe E. Trout D.B. Reinhart* Henry Viscardi, Jr.* Doris K. Christopher Philip Anschutz Dennis R. Washington Robert H. Schuller William P. Clements, Jr. Peter M. Dawkins Carol Bartz Joe L. Allbritton Romeo J. Ventres John B. Connally, Esq.* J. R. “Rick” Hendrick, III Arthur A. Ciocca Walter Anderson Carol Burnett Nicholas D’Agostino* Richard O. Jacobson Thomas C. Cundy Dwayne O. Andreas Trammell Crow Helen M. Gray* Harold F. “Gerry” Lenfest William J. Dor Dorothy L. Brown Robert J. -
6517882645.Pdf
2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 4400 Washington, D.C. 20006 June 21, 2005 Via Electronic Filing Ms. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: Applications for Consent to the Transfer of Control of Licenses and Authorizations from Nextel Communications to Sprint Corporation WT Docket Number 05-63 Dear Ms. Dortch: Clearwire Corporation (“Clearwire”) is filing this letter in support of Nextel Communications’ (“Nextel”) proposed merger with Sprint Corporation (“Sprint”) (the merged entity referred to herein as “Sprint Nextel”). Clearwire was founded by Craig McCaw in 2003 to provide competitive broadband wireless services to residential and small business customers throughout the United States and around the world. Clearwire has acquired access to 2.5 GHz spectrum in many markets throughout the United States and is operating high-speed wireless nomadic Internet access services for residential customers in several states. Clearwire has embarked on an aggressive roll out schedule and has plans to launch broadband systems in a number of additional markets in the coming months. In addition, Clearwire is using licensed spectrum to provide wireless broadband services in several international markets including Mexico, Belgium and Ireland. Furthermore, through its wholly owned subsidiary, NextNet Wireless, Inc., Clearwire is developing, manufacturing and selling equipment that enables the deployment of broadband fixed wireless networks in over 30 countries around the world. Thus, Clearwire and its affiliates are clearly among the wireless industry leaders not only throughout the United States but across the globe. Sprint, Nextel and Clearwire are among the largest holders of spectrum in the Broadband Radio Service (“BRS”) and Educational Broadband Radio Service (“EBS”) 2.5 GHz spectrum band through either license or lease.