SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
OSB Representative Participant List by Industry
OSB Representative Participant List by Industry Aerospace • KAWASAKI • VOLVO • CATERPILLAR • ADVANCED COATING • KEDDEG COMPANY • XI'AN AIRCRAFT INDUSTRY • CHINA FAW GROUP TECHNOLOGIES GROUP • KOREAN AIRLINES • CHINA INTERNATIONAL Agriculture • AIRBUS MARINE CONTAINERS • L3 COMMUNICATIONS • AIRCELLE • AGRICOLA FORNACE • CHRYSLER • LOCKHEED MARTIN • ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS • CARGILL • COMMERCIAL VEHICLE • M7 AEROSPACE GROUP • AVICHINA • E. RITTER & COMPANY • • MESSIER-BUGATTI- CONTINENTAL AIRLINES • BAE SYSTEMS • EXOPLAST DOWTY • CONTINENTAL • BE AEROSPACE • MITSUBISHI HEAVY • JOHN DEERE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES • • BELL HELICOPTER • MAUI PINEAPPLE CONTINENTAL • NASA COMPANY AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS • BOMBARDIER • • NGC INTEGRATED • USDA COOPER-STANDARD • CAE SYSTEMS AUTOMOTIVE Automotive • • CORNING • CESSNA AIRCRAFT NORTHROP GRUMMAN • AGCO • COMPANY • PRECISION CASTPARTS COSMA INDUSTRIAL DO • COBHAM CORP. • ALLIED SPECIALTY BRASIL • VEHICLES • CRP INDUSTRIES • COMAC RAYTHEON • AMSTED INDUSTRIES • • CUMMINS • DANAHER RAYTHEON E-SYSTEMS • ANHUI JIANGHUAI • • DAF TRUCKS • DASSAULT AVIATION RAYTHEON MISSLE AUTOMOBILE SYSTEMS COMPANY • • ARVINMERITOR DAIHATSU MOTOR • EATON • RAYTHEON NCS • • ASHOK LEYLAND DAIMLER • EMBRAER • RAYTHEON RMS • • ATC LOGISTICS & DALPHI METAL ESPANA • EUROPEAN AERONAUTIC • ROLLS-ROYCE DEFENCE AND SPACE ELECTRONICS • DANA HOLDING COMPANY • ROTORCRAFT • AUDI CORPORATION • FINMECCANICA ENTERPRISES • • AUTOZONE DANA INDÚSTRIAS • SAAB • FLIR SYSTEMS • • BAE SYSTEMS DELPHI • SMITH'S DETECTION • FUJI • • BECK/ARNLEY DENSO CORPORATION -
Embarq™ Prepaid Wireless Consumer Terms and Conditions
EMBARQ™ PREPAID WIRELESS CONSUMER TERMS AND CONDITIONS These terms and conditions (“Agreement”) govern EMBARQ’s provision and your use of EMBARQ™ Prepaid Wireless services, phones, and devices (collectively, “Services”). By purchasing Services from EMBARQ, you agree to be bound by the terms set forth below. 1. Agreement; Term and Termination 1.1 General. This Agreement describes the terms on which we agree to provide, and you agree to accept, any prepaid wireless service or product we make available to you, including your Services. You accept this Agreement when you do any of the following: (a) provide your written or electronic signature; (b) accept through an oral or electronic statement; (c) attempt to or in any way use any of the Services; (d) pay for any Services; or (e) open any materials or package that says you are accepting when you open it. The Agreement includes the terms in this document together with the terms associated with the Services you select (as described in our marketing materials, e.g., service plan brochures, or on our website at www.embarq.com). You should carefully read all terms in the Agreement, including among other terms, a MANDATORY ARBITRATION of disputes provision. You represent that you are of sufficient legal age to enter into this Agreement. In the event of conflict among terms in any materials, the terms and conditions posted to www.embarq.com control. In this document, we use the words "we," "us," "our" or "EMBARQ" to refer to Embarq Communications, Inc., any entities under common control with or controlling Embarq Communications, Inc., and any affiliates doing business as EMBARQ. -
Home from Xohm? | Wireless Week 7/30/10 1:37 PM
Analysis - Home from Xohm? | Wireless Week 7/30/10 1:37 PM Analysis - Home from Xohm? By Keith Mallinson Friday, August 31, 2007 Xohm may offer impressive data speeds, but will Sprint and Clearwire be able to match the speed in building out coverage? Sprint, in partnership with Clearwire, boasts support from Google and emerging WiMAX technology vendors Intel, Motorola, Nokia and Samsung. Making a success of it will demand residential broadband customers. Consequently, Sprint’s Internet-styled Xohm service, due for launch in 2008, will be in conflict with Pivot and Sprint’s cable TV partners in this joint venture. WiMAX’s key challenge is in establishing high-volume demand for equipment and services. Infrastructure market leader Ericsson focuses on 3GPP standards for next-generation mobile wireless because it needs substantial equipment volumes to impact its high market share and to drive down costs. GSM has 2.1 billion subscribers; W- CDMA/HSDPA has 130 million, growing at an annual rate of 70%. In contrast, the WiMAX Forum’s Website references SenzaFiliConsulting’s forecast of just 54 million WiMAX subscribers by 2012. That will be equivalent to only about 1% of the world’s mobile subscriber base that year. WiMAX infrastructure and device vendors face formidable competition. Getting the mobile variant of WiMAX – 802.11e – standardized, interoperable and commercially available is no mean feat, but the challenge is broader. Other emerging technologies including HSDPA/HSPA or LTE, and EV-DO Rev B or UMB have similar performance capabilities as mobile WiMAX and benefit from an existing base of mobile users on related technologies and networks that can ensure broad network coverage and availability. -
General* Virginia Private Equity Deals*
VIRGINIA M&A ACTIVITY SNAPSHOTS 2002-2006 US M&A Global M&A Year Deal Count Volume (Millions) Year Deal Count Volume (Millions) 2006 11296 $ 1,776,292.75 2006 27912 $ 3,679,516.00 2005 10348 $ 1,297,140.12 2005 24526 $ 2,627,013.25 2004 9716 $ 971,593.81 2004 22102 $ 1,914,663.25 2003 8109 $ 627,724.56 2003 19353 $ 1,221,885.25 2002 7316 $ 528,825.06 2002 18557 $ 1,130,339.12 Virginia M&A - General* Virginia Private Equity Deals* Year Deal Count Volume (Millions) Year Deal Count Volume (Millions) 2006 437 $ 49,844.53 2006 40 $ 2,345.49 2005 381 $ 51,440.98 2005 17 $ 396.05 2004 370 $ 61,057.25 2004 14 $ 598.85 2003 293 $ 16,980.39 2003 13 $ 1,604.73 2002 282 $ 21,126.50 2002 10 $ 536.20 * Any involvement: includes deals with either target, acquirer or seller * Any involvement: includes deals with either target, acquirer or seller headquartered in the state. headquartered in the state. 2006 Active Industries - VA Industry Deal Count Volume (mil) Communications 40 $ 10,190.03 Industrial 22 $ 3,710.94 Consumer, Non-cyclical 41 $ 3,248.73 Financial 57 $ 2,748.02 Technology 41 $ 655.11 * Target Only: Includes deals in which target is headquartered in the state Top 5 Deals 2006 - US * Any Involvement Announced Rank Date Total Value (mil.) Target Name Acquirer Name 1 3/ 5/06 $ 83,105.46 BELLSOUTH CORP AT&T INC 2 11/20/2006 $ 32,500.31 EQUITY OFFICE PROPERTIES TR BLACKSTONE GROUP 3 7/24/06 $ 32,193.46 HCA INC CONSORTIUM 4 5/29/06 $ 27,449.73 KINDER MORGAN INC Knight Holdco LLC 5 10/2/2006 $ 27,159.94 HARRAH'S ENTERTAINMENT INC CONSORTIUM * Bain -
Improving Public Safety Communications in the 800 Mhz Band; Consolidating the 900 Mhz Industrial/Land Transportation and Business Pool Channels, WT Docket No
Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-168 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Improving Public Safety Communications in the ) 800 MHz Band ) WT Docket 02-55 ) Consolidating the 800 and 900 MHz ) Industrial/Land Transportation and Business Pool ) Channels ) ) ET Docket No. 00-258 Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission’s Rules ) to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile ) and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of ) New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third ) RM-9498 Generation Wireless Systems ) ) Petition for Rule Making of the Wireless ) Information Networks Forum Concerning the ) RM-10024 Unlicensed Personal Communications Service ) ) Petition for Rule Making of UT Starcom, Inc., ) Concerning the Unlicensed Personal ) ET Docket No. 95-18 Communications Service ) ) Amendment of Section 2.106 of the Commission’s ) Rules to Allocate Spectrum at 2 GHz for use by ) the Mobile Satellite Service REPORT AND ORDER, FIFTH REPORT AND ORDER, FOURTH MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, AND ORDER Adopted: July 8, 2004 Released: August 6, 2004 By the Commission: Chairman Powell, Commissioners Abernathy, Copps, and Adelstein issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................... 8 III. MAJOR FINDINGS -
Centurylink Weighs More Expansion of Prism TV Service•
EXHIBIT 7 Press Coverage and News Articles AUSWRNews Page 1 of 1 AUSWR THE AssociATION oF U S WEsT RETIREES CenturyLink weighs more expansion of Prism TV service• By Andy Vuong The Denver Post May 6, 2011 Centurylink chief executive Glen Post indicated during a first-quarter earnings call Thursday that the next market to receive Centurylink's IPTV service will probably be in Qwest's local-phone service territory. And the rollout could come as early as this year. Post said the company expanded the service, called Prism TV, in the first quarter to three new markets: Tallahassee and Orlando, Fla., and Raleigh, N.C. Prism TV, which offers video content over a dedicated Internet network, is available in eight Legacy Centurylink!Embarq markets. Centurylink purchased Embarq in 2009 and completed its acquisition of Denver-based Qwest on April1. Post said the company will continue to expand Prism TV in 2011, ultimately reaching 1 million homes with the service by year's end. However, in response to a question from an analyst, Post said the company does not expect "any additional rollouts in the Centurylink markets" this year. "We'll be evaluating the Qwest markets in the coming months," Post said. "We do think there could be some opportunity there . .. We'll be making those decisions around midyear as far as any additional rollouts of IPTV in any of those markets." Andy Vuong:·303-954 -1209\.\ls, [email protected] or twitter.comlandwuonq http://www.uswestret iree.org/5 8112.htm 9/4/2013 Printer Friendly Version Page 1 of2 Published Apr I, 20 II Published Friday April I , 20 II CenturyLink aims to win market By Ross Boettcher WORLD-HERALD STAFF WRITER TOTAL ACCESS UNES -!f,,e;;t - {)().>; Ct'l'l ~:l"ni::afi ~ns ~';:::':....~ W~f1dstrenm \St'lm ~~ ~r~fil AJrc;;: ~'1! '001 2CIV.i 2002 2003 t.C•J.i 2005 2COS 2CV1 2c.o·~ 2CV£1 2010 I' \ ' ' 1 .- I H' 1 I ) I ~\c. -
Wireless Evolution •..••••.•.•...•....•.•..•.•••••••...••••••.•••.••••••.••.•.••.••••••• 4
Department of Justice ,"'''''''''<11 Bureau of Investigation ,Operational Technology Division WIRELESS EVDLUTIDN IN THIS Iselil-it:: .. WIRELESS EVOLUTIDN I!I TECH BYTES • LONG TERM EVOLUTIQN ill CLDUD SERVICES • 4G TECHNOLOGY ill GESTURE-RECOGNITION • FCC ON BROADBAND • ACTIVITY-BASED NAVIGATION 'aw PUIi! I' -. q f. 8tH'-.1 Waa 8RI,. (!.EIi/RiW81 R.d-nl)) - 11 - I! .el " Ij MESSAGE FROM MANAGEMENT b7E he bou~~aries of technology are constantly expanding. develop technical tools to combat threats along the Southwest Recognizing the pathway of emerging technology is Border. a key element to maintaining relevance in a rapidly changing technological environment. While this The customer-centric approach calls for a high degree of T collaboration among engineers, subject matter experts (SMEs), proficiency is fundamentally important in developing strategies that preserve long-term capabilities in the face of emerging and the investigator to determine needs and requirements. technologies, equally important is delivering technical solutions To encourage innovation, the technologists gain a better to meet the operational needs of the law enforcement understanding of the operational and investigative needs customer in a dynamic 'threat' environment. How can technical and tailor the technology to fit the end user's challenges. law enforcement organizations maintain the steady-state Rather than developing solutions from scratch, the customer production of tools and expertise for technical collection, while centric approach leverages and modifies the technoloe:v to infusing ideas and agility into our organizations to improve our fit the customer's nFlFlrt~.1 ability to deliver timely, relevant, and cutting edge tools to law enforcement customers? Balancing these two fundamentals through an effective business strategy is both a challenge and an opportunity for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and other Federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. -
Operátor Stát MTN Afghanistan Afghanistan Afghan Wireless
Operátor Stát MTN Afghanistan Afghanistan Afghan Wireless Communications Company Afghanistan Etisalat Afghanistan Telecom Development Company Limited Afghanistan Telekom Albania Sh.A Albania ALBtelecom sh.a. Albania Vodafone Albania Sh.A. Albania ATM Mobilis Algeria OPTIMUM TELECOM ALGERIE Spa Algeria Wataniya Algeria s.p.a. Algeria Andorra Telecom, S.A.U. Andorra Unitel Angola Angola Cable & Wireless Anguilla Anguilla APUA imobile (former APUA PCS Ltd.) Antigua and Barbuda Cable & Wireless Antigua Antigua and Barbuda TELECOM ARGENTINA S.A Argentina AMX Argentina S.A. Argentina NII Holdings, Inc. (Nextel Argentina S.R.L.) Argentina Telefonica Moviles Argentina S.A. Argentina VEON Armenia CJSC Armenia MTS Armenia CJSC Armenia Karabakh Telecom Armenia New Millennium Telecom Services NV Aruba Servicio di Telecomunicacion di Aruba (SETAR) N.V. Aruba Telstra Corporation Limited Australia Yes Optus Australia Vodafone Hutchison Australia Pty Limited Australia Hutchison Drei Austria GmbH Austria Hutchison Drei Austria GmbH Austria A1 Telekom Austria AG Austria T-Mobile Austria GmbH Austria A1 Telekom Austria AG Austria A1 Telekom Austria AG Austria T-Mobile Austria GmbH Austria Azercell Telekom B.M. Azerbaijan Azerfon LLC Azerbaijan Bakcell LLC Azerbaijan BTC Bahamas Bahamas Bahrain Telecommunication Company Bahrain Zain Bahrain B.S.C Bahrain Viva Bahrain Robi Axiata Limited Bangladesh Banglalink Digital Communications Ltd. Bangladesh GrameenPhone Limited Bangladesh Teletalk Bangladesh Limited Bangladesh Cable & Wireless Barbados Barbados Mobile TeleSystems Belarus Belarusian Telecommunications Network CJSC Belarus FE VELCOM Belarus Telenet Group BVBA/SPRL Belgium Telenet Group BVBA/SPRL Belgium Orange Belgium SA/NV Belgium Proximus PLC (former Belgacom SA/NV) Belgium Belize Telemedia Limited Belize Etisalat Benin Benin Spacetel-Benin S.A. -
Virgin Mobile USA Response to Commission Staffs Fi
2000 I'NC PI ALA 500wtSl ILIILl?SONSII<L.tl 1 OUISVILI L..KY 40202-2828 DIR~C~bAX 502-333-6099 MAIN (502) 33<-6000 doughs brcnt@skolirm corn I AS (502) 333-6090 www skolirni coni May 2,201 1 Jeffrey LleKouen Executive Director Kentucky Public Service Coinmission 21 1 Sower Boulevard P.O. BOX615 Frankfort, KY 40601 RE: The Petition qf Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. jor Designation us an Eligible Telecommunications Currier in the Commonwealth oj'Kentucky Llear Mr. DeRouen: Enclosed please find the original and ten copies of Virgin Mobile USA, L.P.'s Response to Coinmission Staff's First Data Requests. A verification will be filed separately. Please indicate receipt of this filing by placing your file stamp on the extra copy and returning to me via our runner. Sincerely yours, J1- Douglas F. Brent c: Susan J. Berlin LlFI3: jms Enclosures I I 1993 138842/668928 1 LEXINGTON4 LOUISVILLE4 FRANKFORT4 HENDERSON COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY BEFQRE TI-IE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION MAY 02 2011 PlJBLlC SERVICE IN THE MATTER OF: COMMISSION PETITION OF VIRGIN MOBILE USA, L.P. ) FOR LIMITED DESIGNATION AS AN ) Case No. 20 10-00524 ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS 1 CARRlER ) VIRGIN MOBILE USA, L,.P.'S RESPONSE TO COMMISSION STAFF'S FIRST DATA REQUESTS REQUEST 1. Kentucky currently requires that all Eligible Telecommunications Carriers ("ETCs") perform an audit of all customers receiving Lifeline benefits. Each customer must provide proof of eligibility. Does Virgin Mobile agree to audit all Lifeline customers each year rather than conduct a yearly audit of only a sample of customers? Responsible Party: Elaine Divelbliss RESPONSE: Virgin Mobile agrees to audit all Kentucky Lifeline customers each year, subject to any alternate processes implemented as a result of the FCC's pending Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Lifeline and Link-'CTp Reform and Modernization (WC Docket No. -
Um 1484, Order, 3/24/2011
ORDER NO. 11 ENTERED MAR 242011 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM 1484 In the Matter of CENTURYLINK, INC., ORDER Application for Approval of Merger between CenturyTel, Inc., and Qwest Communications International, Inc. DISPOSITION: APPLICATION GRANTED WITH CONDITIONS I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we grant the Application for Approval of Merger between CenturyTel, Inc. (CenturyTel) and Qwest Communications International, Inc. (Qwest). Our approval is conditioned upon compliance with the requirements set forth in Appendix A to this Order relating to Commission access to financial infonnation, reasonableness review, notification of changes and specific post-merger commitments and responsibilities of CenturyLink, Inc. (CenturyLink or Applicants). II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On May 24,2010, CenturyLink filed the Application for Approval of Merger between the two companies and their regulated subsidiaries, and requested that the Commission promptly issue a Protective Order. The application was accompanied by CenturyLink's direct testimony in support of the application. Qwest simultaneously filed a Petition to Intervene with supporting direct testimony. General Protective Order No. 10-192 was entered on May 26,2010. On June 3,2010, pursuant Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) 774.180, the Citizens' Utility Board of Oregon (CUB) filed its Notice ofIntervention and became a party to the proceeding. A prehearing conference was held on June 8, 2010. Petitions to Intervene were filed by Telecommunications Ratepayers Association for Cost-based and Equitable Rates (TRACER); XO Communications Services, Inc. (XO); tw telecom of Oregon LLC (tw telecom); Charter Fiberlink ORDER NO. '". 'I ,n, ..... ,r' B 8 S :;) OR-CCVII, LLC (Charter); Integra Telecom of Oregon, Inc., Advanced TelCom, Inc., Electric Lightwave, LLC, Eschelon Telecom of Oregon, Inc., Oregon Telecom Inc., and United Telecommunications Inc., d/b/a Unicorn (collectively, "Integra"); Level 3 Communications LLC (Level 3), PriorityOne Telecommunications, Inc. -
Propitch Presentation
610131 NII and AINMT: A partnership to invest in Nextel Brazil’s growth NII Holdings, Inc. JuneApril 20172017 Safe harbor statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 This presentation includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the securities laws. The statements in this presentation regarding the partnership in Nextel Brazil, including the successful completion of the proposed investment, the ownership of each of NII and AINMT in the partnership and the cash available to be invested through the partnership in Nextel Brazil, Nextel Brazil’s business and economic outlook, Nextel Brazil’s future performance and forward-looking guidance, as well as other statements that are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are estimates and projections reflecting management's judgment based on currently available information and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. With respect to these forward-looking statements, management has made assumptions regarding, among other things, NII’s ability to complete the proposed transaction including receiving the required regulatory and shareholder approvals and the amount of cash available to NII to invest in the partnership, NII’s ability to modify its loan and other agreements as required to complete the transaction, NII’s ability to meet its business plans, customer growth and retention, pricing, network usage, operating costs, the timing of various events, the economic and regulatory environment and the foreign currency exchange rates that will prevail during 2017. Future performance cannot be assured and actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. -
Washington, DC 20554 Centurylink ILEC Companies Bandwidth
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington,DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Section 63. 71 Application of ) ) CenturyLink ILECCompanies ) WC Docket No. 19- ) For Authority Pursuant to Section 214 of the ) Communications Act of 1934, As Amended, ) to Grandfather tfieTi-ovision o ow- BandwidthInterstate Private Line Service ) SECTION 63. 71 APPLICATION CenturyLink hereby applies for authority pursuant to Section 63. 71(k) of the Federal Communications Commission's (Commission) rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63. 71(k), and Section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U. S. C. § 214, to grandfather interstate low- speed private line services provided by its CenturyLink ILEC Companies (Affected Services) in all states and jurisdictions in which the Affected Services are provided. CenturyLiiik submits the following infonnation in support of its application: 1. Name and address of carrier CenturyLink 100 CenturyLink Drive Monroe, Louisiana 71203 This application is filed on behalfof CenturyLink's ILEC affiliates listed in Appendix A ("CenturyLinkILEC Companies"). 2. Date of planned service dlscontinuance, reduction or impairment As ofFebmary 1, 2020, or as soon thereafter as the necessary regulatory approvals can be obtained, CenturyLink will no longer offer the Affected Services to new customers, and existing customers of these services will be grandfathered as follows: . New orders and moves will be allowed only to the extent permitted by existing contract. Existing contracts for these services will not be renewed. Customers