Sex and Puberty Influence the Innate Immune System Type 1 IFN Response

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sex and Puberty Influence the Innate Immune System Type 1 IFN Response Sex and puberty influence the innate immune system type 1 interferon response PhD, Division of Medicine, University College London Student: Kate Webb Supervisors: Dr John Ioannou, Prof Lucy R. Wedderburn, Dr Coziana Ciurtin, Prof Gary Butler Declaration: I, Kate Webb confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed………………Date……………………. Table of Contents Impact statement .......................................................................................................................... 9 Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... 12 Dedication.................................................................................................................................... 13 Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... 14 Glossary of abbreviations ............................................................................................................ 15 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ 19 List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... 21 Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................... 24 1.1.1. The immune system ............................................................................................ 24 1.1.1.1. The adaptive immune system-brief overview ............................................. 25 1.1.1.2. The innate immune system-brief overview ................................................. 26 1.1.1.2.3. Toll like receptors ........................................................................................ 28 1.1.1.3. The innate antiviral immune system ........................................................... 30 1.1.1.3.1. Type 1 IFN .................................................................................................... 30 1.1.1.3.2. Type 1 IFN signalling .................................................................................... 30 1.1.1.3.3. Type 1 IFN function and IFN inducible genes .............................................. 32 1.1.1.3.4. Nucleic acid sensing and type 1 IFN production.......................................... 33 1.1.1.3.5. Interferon regulatory factors ....................................................................... 36 1.1.1.3.6. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells-brief overview ................................................ 36 1.1.1.4. Summary ...................................................................................................... 37 1.1.2. Sex ........................................................................................................................ 37 1.1.2.1. Sex and the immune system............................................................................... 37 1.1.2.1.1. Sex and disease......................................................................................... 38 1.1.2.1.2. Sex and the adaptive immune system ..................................................... 40 1.1.2.1.3. Sex and the innate immune system ......................................................... 42 1.1.2.2. Summary ...................................................................................................... 43 1.1.3. Sex Chromosomes ............................................................................................... 43 1.1.3.1. X chromosome related immune disease ..................................................... 43 1.1.3.2. X chromosome related immune genes........................................................ 45 1.1.3.3. Turner’s syndrome ....................................................................................... 47 1.1.3.4. Summary ...................................................................................................... 47 1.1.4. Hormones ............................................................................................................ 48 1.1.4.1. Hormones and the immune system ............................................................ 51 1.1.4.1.1. Oestradiol ................................................................................................. 51 1.1.4.1.2. Testosterone ................................................................................................ 51 2 1.1.4.2. Summary ..................................................................................................... 51 1.1.5. Puberty ................................................................................................................ 51 1.1.5.1. Hormonal changes in puberty ............................................................................ 53 1.1.5.2. Mini puberty of infancy ...................................................................................... 56 1.1.5.3. Puberty and the immune system ....................................................................... 57 1.1.5.4. Gender dysphoria ............................................................................................... 58 1.1.5.5. Summary ............................................................................................................ 60 1.1.6. Sex, puberty, hormone, X chromosome and the TLR7 mediated production of type 1 IFN. ........................................................................................................................... 60 1.1.6.1. TLR7 mediated IFNα production is higher in females ................................. 60 1.1.6.2. Oestradiol and TLR7 induced IFNα production ........................................... 62 1.1.6.3. Testosterone and TLR7 induced IFNα production ...................................... 63 1.1.6.4. TLR7 is coded on the X chromosome. ......................................................... 64 1.1.6.5. Summary ..................................................................................................... 64 1.3. Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus. .......................................................................... 65 1.3.1. Epidemiology of jSLE ................................................................................................. 65 1.3.1.1. Sex ...................................................................................................................... 65 1.3.1.2. Ethnicity ............................................................................................................. 66 1.3.1.3. Age ..................................................................................................................... 67 1.3.2. The clinical manifestations of jSLE ............................................................................ 68 1.3.2.2. Measures of disease activity in jSLE ................................................................... 70 1.3.3. Treatment of jSLE ...................................................................................................... 70 1.3.3.1. General ............................................................................................................... 70 1.3.3.1.1. Anti-malarials .............................................................................................. 71 1.3.3.1.2. Glucocorticoids ........................................................................................... 71 1.3.3.1.3. Immunomodulatory drugs in SLE ................................................................ 72 1.3.3.1.4. Biologic agents in SLE .................................................................................. 72 1.3.4. Summary ................................................................................................................... 75 1.4. Type 1 IFN in the pathogenesis of jSLE ............................................................................ 75 1.4.2. The genetics of SLE .................................................................................................... 75 1.4.2.1. Rare monogenic lupus ....................................................................................... 76 1.4.3. The epigenetics of SLE. .............................................................................................. 79 1.4.3. The transcriptomics of SLE ........................................................................................ 79 1.4.3. The adaptive immune system in SLE. ........................................................................ 81 1.4.4. Type 1 IFN in SLE ....................................................................................................... 82 1.4.5. The source of nucleic acids in SLE ............................................................................. 83 3 1.4.5.1. Apoptosis in SLE .................................................................................................. 83 1.4.5.2. Endogenous nucleic acids ................................................................................... 83 1.4.5.3. Neutrophils ......................................................................................................... 84 1.4.6. Sensing nucleic acids in SLE ......................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Role of Nlrs in the Regulation of Type I Interferon Signaling, Host Defense and Tolerance to Inflammation
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Role of NLRs in the Regulation of Type I Interferon Signaling, Host Defense and Tolerance to Inflammation Ioannis Kienes 1, Tanja Weidl 1, Nora Mirza 1, Mathias Chamaillard 2 and Thomas A. Kufer 1,* 1 Department of Immunology, Institute for Nutritional Medicine, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany; [email protected] (I.K.); [email protected] (T.W.); [email protected] (N.M.) 2 University of Lille, Inserm, U1003, F-59000 Lille, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Type I interferon signaling contributes to the development of innate and adaptive immune responses to either viruses, fungi, or bacteria. However, amplitude and timing of the interferon response is of utmost importance for preventing an underwhelming outcome, or tissue damage. While several pathogens evolved strategies for disturbing the quality of interferon signaling, there is growing evidence that this pathway can be regulated by several members of the Nod-like receptor (NLR) family, although the precise mechanism for most of these remains elusive. NLRs consist of a family of about 20 proteins in mammals, which are capable of sensing microbial products as well as endogenous signals related to tissue injury. Here we provide an overview of our current understanding of the function of those NLRs in type I interferon responses with a focus on viral infections. We discuss how NLR-mediated type I interferon regulation can influence the development of auto-immunity and the immune response to infection. Citation: Kienes, I.; Weidl, T.; Mirza, Keywords: NOD-like receptors; Interferons; innate immunity; immune regulation; type I interferon; N.; Chamaillard, M.; Kufer, T.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Transcriptional Inhibition of Luciferase Reporter Assays
    THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOL. 287, NO. 34, pp. 28705–28716, August 17, 2012 © 2012 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Published in the U.S.A. Post-transcriptional Inhibition of Luciferase Reporter Assays by the Nod-like Receptor Proteins NLRX1 and NLRC3* Received for publication, December 12, 2011, and in revised form, June 18, 2012 Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 20, 2012, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111.333146 Arthur Ling‡1,2, Fraser Soares‡1,2, David O. Croitoru‡1,3, Ivan Tattoli‡§, Leticia A. M. Carneiro‡4, Michele Boniotto¶, Szilvia Benko‡5, Dana J. Philpott§, and Stephen E. Girardin‡6 From the Departments of ‡Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology and §Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto M6G 2T6, Canada, and the ¶Modulation of Innate Immune Response, INSERM U1012, Paris South University School of Medicine, 63, rue Gabriel Peri, 94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France Background: A number of Nod-like receptors (NLRs) have been shown to inhibit signal transduction pathways using luciferase reporter assays (LRAs). Results: Overexpression of NLRX1 and NLRC3 results in nonspecific post-transcriptional inhibition of LRAs. Conclusion: LRAs are not a reliable technique to assess the inhibitory function of NLRs. Downloaded from Significance: The inhibitory role of NLRs on specific signal transduction pathways needs to be reevaluated. Luciferase reporter assays (LRAs) are widely used to assess the Nod-like receptors (NLRs)7 represent an important class of activity of specific signal transduction pathways. Although pow- intracellular pattern recognition molecules (PRMs), which are erful, rapid and convenient, this technique can also generate implicated in the detection and response to microbe- and dan- www.jbc.org artifactual results, as revealed for instance in the case of high ger-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs and DAMPs), throughput screens of inhibitory molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • ATP-Binding and Hydrolysis in Inflammasome Activation
    molecules Review ATP-Binding and Hydrolysis in Inflammasome Activation Christina F. Sandall, Bjoern K. Ziehr and Justin A. MacDonald * Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; [email protected] (C.F.S.); [email protected] (B.K.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-403-210-8433 Academic Editor: Massimo Bertinaria Received: 15 September 2020; Accepted: 3 October 2020; Published: 7 October 2020 Abstract: The prototypical model for NOD-like receptor (NLR) inflammasome assembly includes nucleotide-dependent activation of the NLR downstream of pathogen- or danger-associated molecular pattern (PAMP or DAMP) recognition, followed by nucleation of hetero-oligomeric platforms that lie upstream of inflammatory responses associated with innate immunity. As members of the STAND ATPases, the NLRs are generally thought to share a similar model of ATP-dependent activation and effect. However, recent observations have challenged this paradigm to reveal novel and complex biochemical processes to discern NLRs from other STAND proteins. In this review, we highlight past findings that identify the regulatory importance of conserved ATP-binding and hydrolysis motifs within the nucleotide-binding NACHT domain of NLRs and explore recent breakthroughs that generate connections between NLR protein structure and function. Indeed, newly deposited NLR structures for NLRC4 and NLRP3 have provided unique perspectives on the ATP-dependency of inflammasome activation. Novel molecular dynamic simulations of NLRP3 examined the active site of ADP- and ATP-bound models. The findings support distinctions in nucleotide-binding domain topology with occupancy of ATP or ADP that are in turn disseminated on to the global protein structure.
    [Show full text]
  • NLR Members in Inflammation-Associated
    Cellular & Molecular Immunology (2017) 14, 403–405 & 2017 CSI and USTC All rights reserved 2042-0226/17 $32.00 www.nature.com/cmi RESEARCH HIGHTLIGHT NLR members in inflammation-associated carcinogenesis Ha Zhu1,2 and Xuetao Cao1,2,3 Cellular & Molecular Immunology (2017) 14, 403–405; doi:10.1038/cmi.2017.14; published online 3 April 2017 hronic inflammation is regarded as an impor- nucleotide-binding and oligomerization domain IL-2,8 and NAIP was found to regulate the STAT3 Ctant factor in cancer progression. In addition (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs). TLRs and CLRs are pathway independent of inflammasome formation.9 to the immune surveillance function in the early located in the plasma membranes, whereas RLRs, The AOM/DSS model is the most popular model stage of tumorigenesis, inflammation is also known ALRs and NLRs are intracellular PRRs.3 Unlike used to study the function of NLRs in fl fl as one of the hallmarks of cancer and can supply other families that have been shown to bind their in ammation-associated carcinogenesis. In amma- the tumor microenvironment with bioactive mole- specific cognate ligands, the distinct ligands for somes initiated by NLRs or AIM2 have been widely cules and favor the development of other hallmarks NLRs are still unknown. In fact, mounting evidence reported to participate in the maintenance of 10,11 Nlrp3 Nlrp6 of cancer, such as genetic instability and angiogen- suggests that NLRs function as cytoplasmic sensors intestinal homeostasis. -/-, -/-, Nlrc4 Nlrp1 Nlrx1 Nlrp12 esis. Moreover, inflammation contributes to the and participate in modulating TLR, RLR and CLR -/-, -/-, -/- and -/- mice are 4 more susceptible to AOM/DSS-induced colorectal changing tumor microenvironment by altering signaling pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • Expression Pro Les of NOD-Like Receptors and Regulation Of
    Expression Proles of NOD-Like Receptors and Regulation of NLRP3 Inammasome Activation in Toxoplasma Gondii- Infected Human Small Intestinal Epithelial Cells Jia-Qi CHu Guangdong Medical University Fei Fei Gao Chungnam National University Weiyun Wu Guangdong Medical College Zhanjiang Campus: Guangdong Medical University Chunchao Li Guangdong Medical University Zhaobin Pan Guangdong Medical University Jinhui Sun Guangdong Medical University Hao Wang Guangdong Medical University Cong Huang Peking University Shenzhen Hospital Sang Hyuk Lee Sun General Hospital: Daejeon Sun Hospital Juan-Hua Quan Guangdong Medical University Young-Ha Lee ( [email protected] ) Chungnam National University School of Medicine Research Keywords: Toxoplasma gondii, Human small intestinal epithelial cells, NOD-like receptors, inammasome, Caspase-cleaved interleukins Posted Date: December 23rd, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-133332/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Version of Record: A version of this preprint was published on March 12th, 2021. See the published version at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04666-w. Page 1/17 Abstract Background: Toxoplasma gondii is a parasite that majorly infects through the oral route. Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs) play crucial roles in the immune responses generated during the parasitic infection and also drive the inammatory response against invading parasites. However, little is known about the regulation of NLRs and inammasome activation in T. gondii-infected human small intestinal epithelial (FHs 74 Int) cells. Methods: FHs 74 Int cells infected with T. gondii were subsequently evaluated for morphological changes, cytotoxicity, expression proles of NLRs, inammasome components, caspase-cleaved interleukins (ILs), and the mechanisms of NLRP3 and NLRP6 inammasome activation.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural and Evolutionary Adaptation of NOD-Like Receptors in Birds
    Hindawi BioMed Research International Volume 2021, Article ID 5546170, 11 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5546170 Research Article Structural and Evolutionary Adaptation of NOD-Like Receptors in Birds Xueting Ma ,1,2 Baohong Liu ,1,2 Zhenxing Gong ,1,2 Xinmao Yu ,1,2 and Jianping Cai 1,2 1State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xujiaping 1, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730046, China 2Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province 225009, China Correspondence should be addressed to Jianping Cai; [email protected] Received 25 February 2021; Revised 7 April 2021; Accepted 20 April 2021; Published 30 April 2021 Academic Editor: Hafiz Ishfaq Ahmad Copyright © 2021 Xueting Ma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. NOD-like receptors (NLRs) are intracellular sensors of the innate immune system that recognize intracellular pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Little information exists regarding the incidence of positive selection in the evolution of NLRs of birds or the structural differences between bird and mammal NLRs. Evidence of positive selection was identified in four avian NLRs (NOD1, NLRC3, NLRC5, and NLRP3) using the maximum likelihood approach. These NLRs are under different selection pressures which is indicative of different evolution patterns. Analysis of these NLRs showed a lower percentage of codons under positive selection in the LRR domain than seen in the studies of Toll- like receptors (TLRs), suggesting that the LRR domain evolves differently between NLRs and TLRs.
    [Show full text]
  • NOD-Like Receptors (Nlrs) and Inflammasomes
    International Edition www.adipogen.com NOD-like Receptors (NLRs) and Inflammasomes In mammals, germ-line encoded pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) detect the presence of pathogens through recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or endogenous danger signals through the sensing of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). The innate immune system comprises several classes of PRRs that allow the early detection of pathogens at the site of infection. The membrane-bound toll-like receptors (TLRs) and C-type lectin receptors (CTRs) detect PAMPs in extracellular milieu and endo- somal compartments. TRLs and CTRs cooperate with PRRs sensing the presence of cytosolic nucleic acids, like RNA-sensing RIG-I (retinoic acid-inducible gene I)-like receptors (RLRs; RLHs) or DNA-sensing AIM2, among others. Another set of intracellular sensing PRRs are the NOD-like receptors (NLRs; nucleotide-binding domain leucine-rich repeat containing receptors), which not only recognize PAMPs but also DAMPs. PAMPs FUNGI/PROTOZOA BACTERIA VIRUSES MOLECULES C. albicans A. hydrophila Adenovirus Bacillus anthracis lethal Plasmodium B. brevis Encephalomyo- toxin (LeTx) S. cerevisiae E. coli carditis virus Bacterial pore-forming L. monocytogenes Herpes simplex virus toxins L. pneumophila Influenza virus Cytosolic dsDNA N. gonorrhoeae Sendai virus P. aeruginosa Cytosolic flagellin S. aureus MDP S. flexneri meso-DAP S. hygroscopicus S. typhimurium DAMPs MOLECULES PARTICLES OTHERS DNA Uric acid UVB Extracellular ATP CPPD Mutations R837 Asbestos Cytosolic dsDNA Irritants Silica Glucose Alum Hyaluronan Amyloid-b Hemozoin Nanoparticles FIGURE 1: Overview on PAMPs and DAMPs recognized by NLRs. NOD-like Receptors [NLRs] The intracellular NLRs organize signaling complexes such as inflammasomes and NOD signalosomes.
    [Show full text]
  • NLRP10 Enhances Shigellainduced Proinflammatory Responses
    Cellular Microbiology (2012) doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01822.x NLRP10 enhances Shigella-induced pro-inflammatory responses Katja Lautz,1 Anna Damm,1 Maureen Menning,1 Introduction Julia Wenger,2 Alexander C. Adam,3 Paola Zigrino,4 Elisabeth Kremmer5 and Thomas A. Kufer1* The innate immune system is the first line of defence 1Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and against invading pathogens in mammals. By gaining Hygiene, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. access to the cellular cytoplasm, some bacteria and 2Department of Molecular Biology, University of viruses adopted to escape host innate immune surveil- Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria. lance by membrane standing pattern-recognition recep- 3Department of Pathology, University of Cologne, tors (PRRs) such as the Toll-like receptor family. To cope Cologne, Germany. with such intracellular residing pathogens, the host has 4Department of Dermatology, University of Cologne, evolved sophisticated detection systems. In particular Cologne, Germany. members of the nucleotide-binding domain leucine-rich 5Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Molecular repeat containing family (NLR) have been shown to sense Immunology, Munich, Germany. such invasive bacteria and viruses. NLRs are a heteroge- neous class of 23 AAA+ ATPases in humans, which are characterized by a tripartite structural organization com- Summary prising an effector domain, a STAND type ATPase domain Members of the NLR family evolved as intracellular (called NACHT domain) and a series of leucine-rich sensors for bacterial and viral infection. However, repeats (LRRs) at the carboxyl-terminus (Fritz et al., our knowledge on the implication of most of the 2006; Schroder and Tschopp, 2010). NLRs are classified human NLR proteins in innate immune responses based on the nature of their amino-terminal effector still remains fragmentary.
    [Show full text]
  • NLRC3 Mediated PI3K-Mtor Inhibition Takes a Toll on Colon Cancer
    300 Editorial NLRC3 mediated PI3K-mTOR inhibition takes a toll on colon cancer Nidhi Sharma, Sushmita Jha Department of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Old Residency Road, Ratanada, Jodhpur 342011, Rajasthan, India Correspondence to: Sushmita Jha. Department of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Old Residency Road, Ratanada, Jodhpur 342011, Rajasthan, India. Email: [email protected]. Comment on: Karki R, Man SM, Malireddi RK, et al. NLRC3 is an inhibitory sensor of PI3K-mTOR pathways in cancer. Nature 2016;540:583-7. Submitted Feb 27, 2017. Accepted for publication Mar 06, 2017. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2017.03.54 View this article at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2017.03.54 NLRs (nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeats activation and downstream type I interferon production (7). containing receptors) are pattern recognition receptors, The STING pathway mediates recognition of cytosolic evolutionarily conserved across plants and animals (1). DNA by dendritic cells, generating spontaneous T cell NLRs, initiate immune response against specific damage responses against immunogenic tumors (8). However, and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs/ study by Corrales et al., highlights another major pathway PAMPs) (2). NLRs also contribute to the function and triggered by tumor-derived DNA that activates AIM2 regulation of multiple innate immune signaling pathways (3) inflammasome. The AIM2 inflammasome activation inhibits (Figure 1). NLRC3, the newly characterized NLR family STING pathway, by promoting caspase-1 mediated cell member is preferentially expressed in immune cells. death (9). In summary, these findings highlight the complex NLRC3 performs various innate immune functions such as regulation of inflammasomes, and their association with regulation of several inflammatory signaling pathways (4).
    [Show full text]
  • Integration of Innate Immune Signaling
    Feature Review Integration of Innate Immune Signaling 1,2 1,2 1,2 Christoph A. Thaiss, Maayan Levy, Shlomik Itav, and 1, Eran Elinav * The last decades of research in innate immunology have revealed a multitude of Trends sensing receptors that evaluate the presence of microorganisms or cellular Coordination of innate immune recep- damage in tissues. In the context of a complex tissue, many such sensing tor signaling in response to simulta- neous stimuli in a complex tissue events occur simultaneously. Thus, the downstream pathways need to be occurs at the levels of ligands, signaling integrated to launch an appropriate cellular response, to tailor the magnitude transducers, and immune effector of the reaction to the inciting event, and to terminate it in a manner that avoids mechanisms. immunopathology. Here, we provide a conceptual overview of the crosstalk Cross-activation between innate between innate immune receptors in the initiation of a concerted immune immune receptors involves all families reaction to microbial and endogenous triggers. We classify the known inter- of PRRs and serves as an important means of signal amplification in the actions into categories of communication and provide examples of their impor- initiation of an antimicrobial effector tance in pathogenic infection. response. Cross-inhibition between innate Introduction immune receptors, predominantly invol- ving members of the NLR family, pro- Twenty-five years after the formulation of the theory of pattern recognition in innate immune vides a means of signal prioritization, fi sensing [1], research in the eld of innate immunity has led to the discovery of several families of immune effector hierarchy, and regu- innate immune receptors, their intracellular signaling pathways, and the immune effector lated immune response termination.
    [Show full text]
  • LDL‑Induced NLRC3 Inflammasome Activation in Cardiac Fibroblasts Contributes to Cardiomyocytic Dysfunction
    MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS 24: 526, 2021 LDL‑induced NLRC3 inflammasome activation in cardiac fibroblasts contributes to cardiomyocytic dysfunction PENG WANG1, WENBO ZHANG1, ZHEN FENG1, JIAN ZHANG2, YING SUN1 and WEI ZHANG2 Departments of 1Cardiology and 2Gastroenterology, Feicheng Mining Center Hospital, Feicheng, Shandong 271600, P.R. China Received May 28, 2020; Accepted February 10, 2021 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2021.12165 Abstract. Heart failure (HF) is a progressive myocardial Introduction disease that affects pulse rate. Notably, chronic inflammation serves a crucial role in cardiac dysfunction and HF. Appropriate Heart failure (HF), also known as congestive HF, occurs when cardiomyocyte‑fibroblast communication is essential for the cardiac muscles cannot pump enough blood and oxygen to cardiac function. In addition, cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) are the support other systems (1). HF was considered a contributing main cellular population in the cardiac microenvironment; cause of 1 in 8 deaths in the United States in 2017 (2). HF is therefore, determining the role of CFs in HF progression and a detrimental and progressive pathological condition, which the associated molecular basis is important. In the present seriously affects the daily life of patients. Patients with HF study, ELISAs were performed to detect inflammatory factors present a stage‑related continuous decline in exercise toler‑ in the sera of patients with HF and their association with CF ance that disrupts the ability to function independently (3). activation was analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. In the severe or acute stages of HF, the associated complica‑ The mechanism underlying the proinflammatory phenotype of tions, including edema, dyspnea or infection, can result in CFs was investigated via western blotting.
    [Show full text]
  • Nlrc3-Like Is Required for Microglia Maintenance in Zebrafish
    Journal of Genetics and Genomics 46 (2019) 291e299 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Genetics and Genomics Journal homepage: www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-genetics- and-genomics/ Original research Nlrc3-like is required for microglia maintenance in zebrafish * Tienan Wang a, e, 1,BoYanb, e, , 1, Liang Lou a, Xi Lin a,TaoYua, Shuting Wu a, Qing Lu c, * * Wei Liu d, Zhibin Huang d, Mingjie Zhang a, Wenqing Zhang d, , Zilong Wen a, a Division of Life Science and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, Center of Systems Biology and Human Health, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clearwater Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China b Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201508, China c Bio-X Institutes, Key Laboratory for the Genetics of Developmental and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China d Department of Developmental Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510630, China e Division of Life Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China article info abstract Article history: Microglia are tissue-resident macrophages residing in the central nervous system (CNS) and play critical Received 1 November 2018 roles in removing cellular debris and infectious agents as well as regulating neurogenesis and neuronal Received in revised form activities. Yet, the molecular basis underlying the establishment of microglia pool and the maintenance 17 June 2019 of their homeostasis in the CNS remain largely undefined. Here we report the identification and char- Accepted 17 June 2019 acterization of a mutant zebrafish, which harbors a point mutation in the nucleotide-binding oligo- Available online 22 June 2019 merization domain (NOD) like receptor gene nlrc3-like, resulting in the loss of microglia in a temperature sensitive manner.
    [Show full text]