DOCSLIB.ORG

Arabella Churchill C. 1665 by Mary Beale. James's Mistress 1665-1675

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arabella Churchill C. 1665 by Mary Beale. James's Mistress 1665-1675 02/08/2021 James Stuart 1st Duke of Berwick, Arabella Churchill c. 1665 James and Arabella’s elder son by Mary Beale. James’s mistress 1665-1675, mother of four children by him 1 2 James 1st Earl Waldegrave, son of James and Arabella’s daughter Henrietta Catherine Sedley Countess of Dorchester (1686) c. 1675 by Sir Peter Lely. James’s mistress 1675-1688 3 4 John Sheffield duke of Edward Hyde Lord Chancellor by Sir Buckingham and Normanby by Peter Lely. Chief Minister of Charles I Sir Godfrey Kneller c 1685. He and Charles II, father-in-law of James was the second husband of James and Catherine’s daughter Catherine Darnley 5 6 1 02/08/2021 Laurence Hyde, Earl of Rochester as Anne Hyde, Duchess of York c. 1661 Lord High Treasurer c. 1685 by by Sir Peter Lely, Scottish National Willem Wissing, the Holburne Gallery Museum. James’s brother-in-law 7 8 Anne Hyde, Duchess of York Anne Hyde, Duchess of York c. 1662 by Sir Peter Lely, Hampton 1670 by Sir Peter Lely, National Court Palace Portrait Gallery at Lyme Park 9 10 James as Duke of York 1661 by Samuel Cooper, Victoria & Albert Museum James and Anne as Duke and Duchess of York c. 1665 by Sir Peter Lely, National Portrait Gallery 11 12 2 02/08/2021 James when Duke of York c. 1665 by Sir Peter Lely, Royal Collection The Duke and Duchess of York 1668-70 by Sir Peter Lely with their two daughters Mary and Anne added by Benedetto Gennari II c. 1680, Royal Collection 13 14 Princess Mary 1676 by Princess Mary at 15 in 1677 by Caspar Netscher Nicolaes Maes 15 16 Princess Mary 1677 the year Mary’s husband to be of her marriage, by Sir Peter William of Orange by Jan de Lely Baen 17 18 3 02/08/2021 James duke of Cambridge 1663-7 William of Orange about the time of by John Michael Wright c 1666 his marriage 1677 after Lely 19 20 James duke of Cambridge 1663-7 by William Wissing c 1667 James duke of Cambridge 1663-7 by John Michael Wright c 1666 21 22 Princess Anne by an unknown French artist c 1669 Princess Anne aged 4 with a great tit by Sir Peter Lely 23 24 4 02/08/2021 Princess Anne as Diana Princess Anne c 1683 by William Wissing 25 26 Anne’s husband Prince George of Denmark c 1687 James when Duke of York as Mars by John Riley 1672-3 by Henri Gascar, Queen’s House Greenwich 27 28 Mary of Modena c. 1680 James’s Wedding Suit for his by William Wissing, marriage to Mary of Modena in 1673 Museum of London at Dover, Victoria and Albert Museum 29 30 5 02/08/2021 Mary of Modena c. 1685 by William Wissing, National Portrait Gallery Mary of Modena British Delftware c. 1685 31 32 Mary of Modena c. 1687 by William Mary of Modena by Sir Peter Lely, Wissing, Scottish National Portrait Ranger's House Greenwich Gallery 33 34 Mary of Modena as queen c. 1687 by Sir Godfrey Kneller, Chirk Castle Broadsheet of Mary of Modena and her confessor Edward Petre - “It is a foolish Sheep that makes the Wolf her Confessor” 35 36 6 02/08/2021 Princess Isabella 1676- 1681 by Sir Peter Lely c 1680 birth of Prince James 20 June 1688 Italian engraving 37 38 Dutch engraving suggestion substution Allegory of Old Pretender by William Vincent 39 40 Satire on birth of Old Pretender Mary of Modena and James Francis Edward c 1692 by Gennari 41 42 7 02/08/2021 Prince James c 1703 attributed to Alexis Simon Prince James Francis Edward Belle Stuart attributed to Jacques van Schuppen 43 44 Princess Louisa by Alexis Simon Prince James Francis Edward and Belle 1704 his sister Princess Louisa by Nicolas de Largilliere 1695 45 46 Princess Louisa by François de Troy c 1705 James as Naval Commander 1684 by Sir Godfrey Kneller, National Portrait Gallery 47 48 8 02/08/2021 James c. 1685 by Ann Killigrew, Royal Collection James in his role as head of the Army wearing a General Officer's State coat c. 1685 attributed to Benedetto Gennari II, National Army Musuem 49 50 James by Sir Peter Lely James c. 1686 by Nicolas de Largillière, Queen’s House Greenwich 51 52 James dressed as Roman general c. 1686 by Grinling Gibbons now in Trafalgar Square James as commander after his Deposition c. 1690 around the time of the Battle of the Boyne by an unknown artist, National Portrait Gallery 53 54 9 02/08/2021 Medals of Charles II and James II, National Maritime Museum 55 56 10.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE POWER of BEAUTY in RESTORATION ENGLAND Dr
    THE POWER OF BEAUTY IN RESTORATION ENGLAND Dr. Laurence Shafe [email protected] THE WINDSOR BEAUTIES www.shafe.uk • It is 1660, the English Civil War is over and the experiment with the Commonwealth has left the country disorientated. When Charles II was invited back to England as King he brought new French styles and sexual conduct with him. In particular, he introduced the French idea of the publically accepted mistress. Beautiful women who could catch the King’s eye and become his mistress found that this brought great wealth, titles and power. Some historians think their power has been exaggerated but everyone agrees they could influence appointments at Court and at least proposition the King for political change. • The new freedoms introduced by the Reformation Court spread through society. Women could appear on stage for the first time, write books and Margaret Cavendish was the first British scientist. However, it was a totally male dominated society and so these heroic women had to fight against established norms and laws. Notes • The Restoration followed a turbulent twenty years that included three English Civil Wars (1642-46, 1648-9 and 1649-51), the execution of Charles I in 1649, the Commonwealth of England (1649-53) and the Protectorate (1653-59) under Oliver Cromwell’s (1599-1658) personal rule. • Following the Restoration of the Stuarts, a small number of court mistresses and beauties are renowned for their influence over Charles II and his courtiers. They were immortalised by Sir Peter Lely as the ‘Windsor Beauties’. Today, I will talk about Charles II and his mistresses, Peter Lely and those portraits as well as another set of portraits known as the ‘Hampton Court Beauties’ which were painted by Godfrey Kneller (1646-1723) during the reign of William III and Mary II.
    [Show full text]
  • WARTS and ALL the Portrait Miniatures of Samuel Cooper (1609-1672)
    PRESS RELEASE October 2013 WARTS AND ALL The Portrait Miniatures of Samuel Cooper (1609-1672) A major loan exhibition dedicated to the first internationally celebrated British artist, Samuel Cooper, will go display at the Philip Mould gallery from 13 November – 7 December 2013 (Preview Tuesday, 12 November). Known to his contemporaries as ‘the prince of limners’ or ‘Vandyck in little’. Lenders to the exhibition include Royal Collection Trust, The Duke of Buccleuch, Castle Howard, Burghley House, The Ashmolean Museum, the Victoria and Albert Museum and the National Portrait Gallery. The exhibition takes its name from the Duke of Buccleuch’s iconic unfinished portrait of Oliver Cromwell, which, for the first time, will be hung alongside Sir Peter Lely’s identical portrait of Cromwell [on loan from Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery]. The death mask of Oliver Cromwell will also be loaned from Warwick Castle to allow visitors to compare his features to Cooper’s ad vivum sketch and subsequent portraits. As the exhibition will conclusively show, it is to Cooper that Oliver Cromwell is believed to have made clear his desire to be painted ‘warts and all’. This ambitious exhibition has been curated by Emma Rutherford, portrait miniature specialist to Philip Mould & Co, who has succeeded in securing loans from across the country to make this an outstanding show and give visitors a rare opportunity to glimpse these significant portraits together. Most have not been seen together since leaving Cooper’s studio in the 17th Century. The curator, Emma Rutherford, says “visitors to the exhibition will be able to visually follow Cooper’s career in the same way that we are able to read Pepys diary.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles II: Art & Power
    CONTACT SHEET Charles II: Art & Power The Queen’s Gallery, Palace of Holyroodhouse 23 November 2018 – 2 June 2019 Simon Verelst, Charles II, c.1670–75 Antonio Verrio, The Sea Triumph of Charles II, c.1674 Michiel Jansz van Miereveld, A bearded old Man with a Shell, c.1606 Orazio Gentileschi, A Sibyl, c.1635–8 Paolo Veronese, The Mystic Marriage of Georges de la Tour, St Catherine Saint Jerome, of c.1621–3 Alexandria, c.1562–9 Press Office, Royal Collection Trust, York House, St James’s Palace, London SW1A 1BQ T. +44 (0)20 7839 1377, [email protected], www.royalcollection.org.uk Cristofano Allori, Judith with the Parmigianino, Head of Pallas Athena, Holofernes, c.1531–8 1613 Sir Peter Lely, Sir Peter Lely, Barbara Villiers, Catherine of Duchess of Braganza, Cleveland, c.1663–65 c.1665 Pierre Fourdrinier, The Royal Palace of Holyrood House, Side table, c.1670 c.1753 Leonardo da Vinci, The muscles of the Hans Holbein the back and arm, Younger, Frances, c. 1508 Countess of Surrey, c.1532–3 Press Office, Royal Collection Trust, York House, St James’s Palace, London SW1A 1BQ T. +44 (0)20 7839 1377, [email protected], www.royalcollection.org.uk A selection of images is available at www.picselect.com. For further information contact Royal Collection Trust Press Office +44 (0)20 7839 1377 or [email protected]. Notes to Editors Royal Collection Trust, a department of the Royal Household, is responsible for the care of the Royal Collection and manages the public opening of the official residences of The Queen.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Hawke Locker and the Foundation of The
    EDWARD HAWKE LOCKER AND THE FOUNDATION OF THE NATIONAL GALLERY OF NAVAL ART (c. 1795-1845) CICELY ROBINSON TWO VOLUMES VOLUME II - ILLUSTRATIONS PhD UNIVERSITY OF YORK HISTORY OF ART DECEMBER 2013 2 1. Canaletto, Greenwich Hospital from the North Bank of the Thames, c.1752-3, NMM BHC1827, Greenwich. Oil on canvas, 68.6 x 108.6 cm. 3 2. The Painted Hall, Greenwich Hospital. 4 3. John Scarlett Davis, The Painted Hall, Greenwich, 1830, NMM, Greenwich. Pencil and grey-blue wash, 14¾ x 16¾ in. (37.5 x 42.5 cm). 5 4. James Thornhill, The Main Hall Ceiling of the Painted Hall: King William and Queen Mary attended by Kingly Virtues. 6 5. James Thornhill, Detail of the main hall ceiling: King William and Queen Mary. 7 6. James Thornhill, Detail of the upper hall ceiling: Queen Anne and George, Prince of Denmark. 8 7. James Thornhill, Detail of the south wall of the upper hall: The Arrival of William III at Torbay. 9 8. James Thornhill, Detail of the north wall of the upper hall: The Arrival of George I at Greenwich. 10 9. James Thornhill, West Wall of the Upper Hall: George I receiving the sceptre, with Prince Frederick leaning on his knee, and the three young princesses. 11 10. James Thornhill, Detail of the west wall of the Upper Hall: Personification of Naval Victory 12 11. James Thornhill, Detail of the main hall ceiling: British man-of-war, flying the ensign, at the bottom and a captured Spanish galleon at top. 13 12. ‘The Painted Hall’ published in William Shoberl’s A Summer’s Day at Greenwich, (London, 1840) 14 13.
    [Show full text]
  • A Suit of Silver: the Underdress of a Knight of the Garter in the Late Seventeenth Century
    Costume, vol. 48, no. 1, 2014 A Suit of Silver: The Underdress of a Knight of the Garter in the Late Seventeenth Century By D W This paper describes the cut and construction of the doublet and hose worn as underdress to the robes and insignia of the Knights of the Most Noble Order of the Garter at the English Court under Charles II. This example belonged to Charles Stuart, sixth Duke of Lennox and third Duke of Richmond (1639–1672), who was created a knight of the Garter in 1661. It is interesting on several counts: the dominant textile is a very pure cloth of silver; the elaborate hose are constructed with reference to earlier seventeenth-century models; the garments exemplify Charles II’s understanding of the importance of ceremony to successful kingship. The suit was conserved for an exhibition at the National Museum of Scotland in Edinburgh and the essay gives some account of discoveries made through this process. In addition, the garments are placed in the context of late seventeenth- century dress. : Charles II, Charles Stuart, sixth Duke of Lennox and third Duke of Richmond, Order of the Garter, ceremonial dress, seventeenth-century men’s clothing, seventeenth-century tailoring T N M S, Edinburgh, UK has in its possession a set of clothes comprising a late seventeenth-century ceremonial doublet and trunk hose, part of the underdress of the robes of the Order of the Garter (Figures 1 and 2).1 The garments are made of cloth of silver and were once worn by Charles Stuart, sixth Duke of Lennox and third Duke of Richmond (1639–1672), who was created a knight of the Garter in 1661.
    [Show full text]
  • S 11 T Is Ii Nn 1N 1101 In
    s 11 T i s ii n n H- w 3 £ 1n 1101 i n <W O W hf Washington 25, D.C NEWS RELEASE DATE For release July 11, 1962 Washington,. D.C., July 11, 1962. The Traveling Exhibition Service of the Smithsonian Institution announced today a forthcoming exhibition of major importance, "Old Master Drawings from Chatsworth," which will open at the National Gallery of Art on October 28th. The lik magnificent drawings which comprise the exhibition are on loan from one of the finest private art collections in England, formed by the second Duke of Devonshire in the late 17th and early l8th centuries and enlarged by his descendants. Selected by Mr. A. E. Popham, for many years Keeper of Prints and Drawings at the British Museum, they illustrate the art of drawing in Europe from the Renaissance to the end of the 17th century. Chatsworth is one of the most famous of the great British country houses, and only on two occasions has an exhibition representing its wealth of drawings been attempted. Both were in England. Perhaps the outstanding feature of the collection is the series of landscape drawings by Rembrandt, ten of which are to be shown. Among the kj other artists represented are Leonardo da Vinci, Raphael, Giulio Romano, Mantegna, Correggio, Parmigianino, Primaticcio, Veronese, Rosso, Bruegel, Van i) ~~ Dyck, Rubens^ Durer, Holbein, and Inigo Jones. The earliest drawing in the exhibition is by an anonymous 15th century Sienese artist showing the "Betrayal of Christ" on one side and a finished composition representing "Christ Before the High Priest" on the reverse.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Aldred/Nattes/RS Corr 27/12/10 13:14 Page 1
    1 Tittler Roberts:1 Aldred/Nattes/RS corr 27/12/10 13:14 Page 1 Volume XI, No. 2 The BRITISH ART Journal Discovering ‘T. Leigh’ Tracking the elusive portrait painter through Stuart England and Wales1 Stephanie Roberts & Robert Tittler 1 Robert Davies III of Gwysaney by Thomas Leigh, 1643. Oil on canvas, 69 x 59 cm. National Museum Wales, Cardiff. With permission of Amgueddfa Cymru-National Museum Wales n a 1941 edition of The Oxford Journal, Maurice 2 David, 1st Earl Barrymore by Thomas Leigh, 1636. Oil on canvas, 88 x 81 Brockwell, then Curator of the Cook Collection at cm. Current location unknown © Christie’s Images Ltd 2008 IDoughty House in Richmond, Surrey, submitted the fol- lowing appeal for information: [Brockwell’s] vast amount of data may not amount to much T. LEIGH, PORTRAIT-PAINTER, 1643. Information is sought in fact,’5 but both agreed that the little available information regarding the obscure English portrait-painter T. Leigh, who on Leigh was worth preserving nonetheless. Regrettably, signed, dated and suitably inscribed a very limited number of Brockwell’s original notes are lost to us today, and since then pictures – and all in 1643. It is strange that we still know nothing no real attempt has been made to further identify Leigh, until about his origin, place and date of birth, residence, marriage and now. death… Much research proves that the biographical facts Brockwell eventually sold the portrait of Robert Davies to regarding T. Leigh recited in the Burlington Magazine, 1916, xxix, the National Museum of Wales in 1948, thus bringing p.3 74, and in Thieme Becker’s Allgemeines Lexikon of 1928 are ‘Thomas Leigh’ to national attention as a painter of mid-17th too scanty and not completely accurate.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Peter Lely (1618-1680): Dutch Classicist, English Portraitist, and Collector
    Sir Peter Lely (1618-1680): Dutch Classicist, English Portraitist, and Collector Brandon Henderson DISSERTATION.COM Boca Raton Sir Peter Lely (1618-1680): Dutch Classicist, English Portraitist, and Collector Copyright © 2001 Brandon Henderson All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the publisher. Dissertation.com Boca Raton, Florida USA • 2008 ISBN-10: 1-59942-688-9 ISBN-13: 978-1-59942-688-4 Due to large file size, some images within this ebook do not appear in high resolution. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to pay tribute to those who contributed significantly to this work. First, I want to thank my Mom and Dad for their love and encouragement throughout this project and always. Second, I want to thank Dr. Megan Aldrich and Dr. Chantal Brotherton-Ratcliffe at Sotheby’s Institute of Art, London, for their comments and suggestions. Third, I want to acknowledge the staff at the British Library and the National Art Library within the Victoria and Albert Museum for their support. And finally, I want to thank the library staff at Sotheby’s Institute of Art, London, for their assistance. ii CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................... ii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS . ...................................................................................... iv CHAPTER I Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Early Royal Society and Visual Culture Sachiko Kusukawa1 Trinity
    The Early Royal Society and Visual Culture Sachiko Kusukawa1 Trinity College, Cambridge [Abstract] Recent studies have fruitfully examined the intersection between early modern science and visual culture by elucidating the functions of images in shaping and disseminating scientific knowledge. Given its rich archival sources, it is possible to extend this line of research in the case of the Royal Society to an examination of attitudes towards images as artefacts –manufactured objects worth commissioning, collecting and studying. Drawing on existing scholarship and material from the Royal Society Archives, I discuss Fellows’ interests in prints, drawings, varnishes, colorants, images made out of unusual materials, and methods of identifying the painter from a painting. Knowledge of production processes of images was important to members of the Royal Society, not only as connoisseurs and collectors, but also as those interested in a Baconian mastery of material processes, including a “history of trades”. Their antiquarian interests led to discussion of painters’ styles, and they gradually developed a visual memorial to an institution through portraits and other visual records. Introduction In the Royal Society Library there is a manuscript (MS/136) entitled “Miniatura or the Art of Lymning” 2 by Edward Norgate (1581-1650), who was keeper of the King’s musical instruments, Windsor Herald, and an art agent for “the collector Earl”, Thomas Howard, Earl of Arundel (1586-1646) (Norgate 1997, pp. 1-9). Two versions exist of Norgate’s “Miniatura”, the first of which was 1 written for his friend, Sir Theodore Turquet de Mayerne (1573-1655), and a second, expanded treatise was dedicated to his patron’s son, Henry Frederick Howard, the third Earl of Arundel (1608-1652), also an art connoisseur.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exhibition of Miniatures by Celebrated Masters of the 16Th, 17Th
    e ,._ r ,31 ' la y a. .rt .*-=;: r Y, }F 'r' zs. :T". , T y a '. .. 4 e. .. ' Yd t"S :l^ .°kw't'' ti , y . _.. ' _'Q' it".', ,.k u .. '. :. ',. ''°4, .. E ..:&. .: w.....a w.w."_ ..:isriw r.:: w::i .;..... :.:e+ .' : =:v.. :"ss - AIC .cell x" fi" ii. .e . g'ay', s' " ,," s ' i ' ' i '' ,w~"Y" l .j,' JiE"rI.J'Y3tl w 3t Y3F x ±%S Y ' L d xk4,". , . ; is _~t "*Fb V ' ' A"." . F LYE': %^ .':+ : 3 r S'n " s . y gg " I'P s { &i .: :L", ? f ,l''. ;:;, .:& 4rrri.1} , f X 3. ': r', . " ; . ax' I ', :'"Y; ' Nx r 1s> : ;:. F .. hWrM': wi K ?ny a ' NS'VI qu4xbib tiou of %Ilin liaturr 4letbrattb ~atr% onf the I ft, 17to ab 18th Qetr r M. KNOEDLER & CO. 355 FIFTH AVE. NEW YORK 1906 GOERCK ART PRESS SEVENTH AVE. AT FIFTY-THIRD ST. N EW YO0R K ntrobuction The well-known English writer, J. J. Foster, in his comprehensive work entitled, "British Miniature Paint- ers and Their Works," gives a most interesting account of the history and periods of this delightful branch of art. He says in part in his introductory chapter: "Viewed from the artistic standpoint, fine miniatures possess technical features of delicacy and of beauty peculiar to themselves; whilst, as historical illustrations, genuine portraits lend, it must be owned, a living inter- est to our annals still greater than they already pos- sess. 'We see the faithful effigies of those who have played extraordinary parts and proved themselves se- lect men amongst men; we read their countenances, we trace their characters and conduct in the unreal images, and then, as if made free of their company, follow on with redoubled animation the events in which they lived and moved and had their being.' Hence authentic portraits are things of real and deep importance to students of Art, of History, of Literature, of Cus- tume, and I know not what other branches of that most fascinating study-the Past.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Commonwealth to the Georgian Period, 1650-1730
    A STROLL THROUGH TATE BRITAIN This two-hour talk is part of a series of twenty talks on the works of art displayed in Tate Britain, London, in June 2017. Unless otherwise mentioned all works of art are at Tate Britain. References and Copyright • The talk is given to a small group of people and all the proceeds, after the cost of the hall is deducted, are given to charity. • Our sponsored charities are Save the Children and Cancer UK. • Unless otherwise mentioned all works of art are at Tate Britain and the Tate’s online notes, display captions, articles and other information are used. • Each page has a section called ‘References’ that gives a link or links to sources of information. • Wikipedia, the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Khan Academy and the Art Story are used as additional sources of information. • The information from Wikipedia is under an Attribution-Share Alike Creative Commons License. • Other books and articles are used and referenced. • If I have forgotten to reference your work then please let me know and I will add a reference or delete the information. 1 A STROLL THROUGH TATE BRITAIN • The History of the Tate • From Absolute Monarch to Civil War, 1540-1650 • From Commonwealth to the Georgians, 1650-1730 • The Georgians, 1730-1780 • Revolutionary Times, 1780-1810 • Regency to Victorian, 1810-1840 • William Blake • J. M. W. Turner • John Constable • The Pre-Raphaelites, 1840-1860 West galleries are 1540, 1650, 1730, 1760, 1780, 1810, 1840, 1890, 1900, 1910 East galleries are 1930, 1940, 1950, 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 Turner Wing includes Turner, Constable, Blake and Pre-Raphaelite drawings Agenda 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Diploma Lecture Series 2012 Absolutism to Enlightenment
    Diploma Lecture Series 2012 Absolutism to enlightenment: European art and culture 1665-1765 Charles II and the restoration Lorraine Kypiotis 15 / 16 February 2012 Lecture summary: The Restoration had an exhilarating bravado characterised by a lavish and flamboyant court. It saw the return of the theatre, a flourishing of the arts and the founding of the Royal Society in a court that was the glamorous and often scandalous centre of a London that would rise from the flames like a phoenix. The return of Charles II to the throne in 1660 marked a moment of political and cultural change almost as dramatic as that brought about by his father’s execution 11 years earlier. After the repressions of the interregnum and the uncertainties and poverty of the exiled court, there was an appetite for exuberance, indulgence and transgression – an appetite that the king came to symbolize. After the puritanical sobriety of Cromwell’s parliament, England once again flourished in the arts and sciences. Charles, and his court patronised a number of scientists, architects, poets and dramatists whose influences were felt far beyond the reign of the “Merry Monarch”. Most importantly in the field of the fine arts, Charles was responsible for the recovery of many of the great paintings in the British Royal Collection that had been sold by the Commonwealth after his father’s execution; for the acquisition of a number of fine works by the great artists of the Baroque; and in his patronage of portraitists such as Sir Peter Lely. Charles and the artists he patronised were responsible for the enduring images of a monarchy restored.
    [Show full text]