The Wear and Corrosive-Wear Response of Tungsten Carbide-Cobalt Hardmetals Under Woodcutting and Three Body Abrasion Conditions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Wear and Corrosive-Wear Response of Tungsten Carbide-Cobalt Hardmetals Under Woodcutting and Three Body Abrasion Conditions The wear and corrosive-wear response of tungsten carbide-cobalt hardmetals under woodcutting and three body abrasion conditions Submitted to the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Erlangen-Nürnberg in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOKTOR-INGENIEUR by Natasha Sacks Erlangen 2002 Das Verschleiß- und Korrosions-Verschleißverhalten von Wolframkarbid-Kobalt-Hartmetallen bei der Holzzerspanung und unter Drei-Körper-Abrasivverschleiß Der Technischen Fakultät der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg zur Erlangung des Grades DOKTOR-INGENIEUR vorgelegt von Natasha Sacks Erlangen 2002 Als Dissertation genehmigt von der Technischen Fakultät der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Tag der Einreichung: 19. Dezember 2002 Tag der Promotion: 31. März 2003 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Winnacker Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. H.-G. Sockel Prof. Dr. P. Schmuki Table of Contents i Table of Contents 1 Introduction (English) ........................................................................................... 1 2 Introduction (German)........................................................................................... 3 3 Objectives .............................................................................................................. 6 4 Literature Review................................................................................................... 7 4.1 Woodcutting tool wear.................................................................................................7 4.1.1 Wood...................................................................................................................................... 7 4.1.2 Tool wear ............................................................................................................................... 8 4.1.3 Methods used to assess the blunting of the cutting edges.................................................... 8 4.1.4 Influence of force, temperature and speed.......................................................................... 10 4.1.5 Tool wear relating to the cutting of natural wood................................................................. 13 4.1.6 Tool wear relating to the cutting of synthetic wood products............................................... 15 4.2. Woodcutting tools.....................................................................................................17 4.3 Tungsten carbide hardmetals ...................................................................................18 4.3.1 Hardmetal manufacture ....................................................................................................... 18 4.3.2 Hardmetal constituents ........................................................................................................ 20 4.3.3 Porosity ................................................................................................................................ 26 4.3.4 Hardness.............................................................................................................................. 26 4.4 Corrosion ....................................................................................................................28 4.4.1 Galvanic corrosion and Stern’s rule..................................................................................... 28 4.4.2 Corrosion of cobalt............................................................................................................... 29 4.4.3 Corrosion of WC .................................................................................................................. 30 4.4.4 Corrosion of WC-Co ............................................................................................................ 31 4.5 Wear.............................................................................................................................32 4.5.1 Abrasive wear ...................................................................................................................... 33 4.5.2 Lubrication ........................................................................................................................... 36 4.5.3 Abrasive wear of WC-Co alloys........................................................................................... 37 4.5.4 Corrosive-wear..................................................................................................................... 41 4.5.5 Corrosive-wear of WC-Co alloys ......................................................................................... 43 5 Experimental Methods ........................................................................................ 45 5.1 Material Characterization...........................................................................................45 5.1.1 Investigated hardmetals....................................................................................................... 45 5.1.2 Hardmetal quality evaluation ............................................................................................... 46 5.1.3 Density ................................................................................................................................. 47 5.1.4. Magnetic saturation ............................................................................................................ 48 5.1.5 Coercivity ............................................................................................................................. 48 5.1.6 Hardness and fracture toughness ....................................................................................... 48 5.1.7 Surface roughness............................................................................................................... 49 5.1.8 Quantitative microstructure analysis.................................................................................... 50 5.2 Woodcutting tests ......................................................................................................50 5.3 Corrosion tests...........................................................................................................53 5.4 Three body abrasive wear tests................................................................................57 Table of Contents ii 6 Results.................................................................................................................. 63 6.1 Material characterization ...........................................................................................63 6.2 Woodcutting tests ......................................................................................................64 6.2.1 Cutting edge widths and wear rates in the incipient wear stage ......................................... 64 6.2.2 Cutting edge widths and wear rates in the steady wear stage ............................................ 70 6.2.3 Microstructural examination................................................................................................. 73 6.2.4 Summary of the main findings ............................................................................................. 82 6.3 Corrosion tests...........................................................................................................83 6.3.1 Microstructural examination................................................................................................. 92 6.3.2 Summary of the main findings ............................................................................................. 96 6.4 Abrasive wear and corrosive abrasive-wear tests ..................................................96 6.4.1 Comparison of the wear rates under dry, water and tannic acid conditions........................ 97 6.4.2 Comparison of the wear rates under varied tannic acid concentration ............................... 99 6.4.3 Comparison of the wear rates under varied applied normal force..................................... 101 6.4.4 Comparison of the wear rates under varying abrading wheel speed ................................ 106 6.4.5 Microstructural examination............................................................................................... 109 6.4.6 Summary of the main findings ........................................................................................... 116 7 Discussion ..........................................................................................................118 7.1 Evaluation of the wear response during the woodcutting tests ..........................118 7.1.1 Influence of the wood-tool set-up on the wear process..................................................... 118 7.1.2 Influence of the wood type on the wear process ............................................................... 119 7.1.3 Comparison between the wear response of the two hardmetal woodcutting knives......... 121 7.1.4 Comparison of the initial and the steady state wear stages .............................................. 123 7.2 Corrosion response of the hardmetals ..................................................................123 7.3 Evaluation of the wear response during the three body abrasion tests .............125 7.3.1 Evaluation of the general wear process for the investigated system ................................ 125 7.3.2 Influence of fluids on the wear process ............................................................................. 128 7.3.3 Influence of corrosion on abrasive wear...........................................................................
Recommended publications
  • GALVANIC/DISSIMILAR METAL CORROSION What It Is and How to Avoid It ASSDA Technical FAQ No 1 1 Edition 2, May 2009
    AUSTRALIAN STAINLESS STEEL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION GALVANIC/DISSIMILAR METAL CORROSION What it is and how to avoid it ASSDA Technical FAQ No 1 1 Edition 2, May 2009 Contact between dissimilar metals Metal to metal contact The graph shows that stainless steels have occurs frequently but is often not two ranges of potential. The usual, passive Galvanic corrosion can only occur if the a problem. The aluminium head behaviour is shown by the light hatching. dissimilar metals are in electrical contact. However, if the passive film breaks down, on a cast iron block, the solder on The contact may be direct or by an the stainless steel corrodes and its a copper pipe, galvanising on a external pipe or wire or bolt. If the potential is in the dark bar range. steel purlin and the steel fastener dissimilar metals are insulated from each in an aluminium sheet are common other by suitable plastic strips, washers or As a rule of thumb, if the potential examples. sleeves then galvanic corrosion cannot difference is less than 0.1 volt, then it is occur. Paint is not a reliable electrical unlikely that galvanic corrosion will be significant. WHAT CAUSES GALVANIC insulator especially under bolt heads or CORROSION? nuts or washers or near edges of sheets of If all three conditions are met then metal. The paint is usually damaged on galvanic corrosion is probable and the rate For galvanic or dissimilar or installation or by subsequent movement. of corrosion will be influenced by the electrolytic corrosion to occur, Note that the chromium oxide film layer relative area and the current density three conditions must be met: on the stainless steel is very thin and not delivered by the noble metal.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Peroxide Material Compatibility Chart from ISM and IS
    ver 09-Jul-2020 Hydrogen Peroxide Material Compatibility Chart All wetted surfaces should be made of materials that are compatible with hydrogen peroxide. The wetted area or surface of a part, component, vessel or piping is a surface which is in permanent contact with or is permanently exposed to the process fluid (liquid or gas). Less than 8% concentration H2O2 is considered a non-hazardous substance. Typically encountered versions are baking soda-peroxide toothpaste (0.5%), contact lens sterilizer (2%), over-the-counter drug store Hydrogen Peroxide (3%), liquid detergent non-chlorine bleach (5%) and hair bleach (7.5%). At 8% to 28% H2O2 is rated as a Class 1 Oxidizer. At these concentrations H2O2 is usually encountered as a swimming pool chemical used for pool shock treatments. In the range of 28.1% to 52% concentrations, H2O2 is rated as a Class 2 Oxidizer, a Corrosive and a Class 1 Unstable (reactive) substance. At these concentrations, H2O2 is considered industrial strength grade. Concentrations from 52.1% to 91% are rated as Class 3 Oxidizers, Corrosive and Class 3 Unstable (reactive) substances. H2O2 at these concentrations are used for specialty chemical processes. At concentrations above 70%, H2O2 is usually designated as high-test peroxide (HTP). Concentrations of H2O2 greater than 91% are currently used as rocket propellant. At these concentrations, H2O2 is rated as a Class 4 Oxidizer, Corrosive and a Class 3 Unstable (reactive) substance. Compatibility Compatibility Compatibility Compatibility Material 10% H2O2 30% H2O2 50%
    [Show full text]
  • Ceramic Carbides: the Tough Guys of the Materials World
    Ceramic Carbides: The Tough Guys of the Materials World by Paul Everitt and Ian Doggett, Technical Specialists, Goodfellow Ceramic and Glass Division c/o Goodfellow Corporation, Coraopolis, Pa. Silicon carbide (SiC) and boron carbide (B4C) are among the world’s hardest known materials and are used in a variety of demanding industrial applications, from blasting-equipment nozzles to space-based mirrors. But there is more to these “tough guys” of the materials world than hardness alone—these two ceramic carbides have a profile of properties that are valued in a wide range of applications and are worthy of consideration for new research and product design projects. Silicon Carbide Use of this high-density, high-strength material has evolved from mainly high-temperature applications to a host of engineering applications. Silicon carbide is characterized by: • High thermal conductivity • Low thermal expansion coefficient • Outstanding thermal shock resistance • Extreme hardness FIGURE 1: • Semiconductor properties Typical properties of silicon carbide • A refractive index greater than diamond (hot-pressed sheet) Chemical Resistance Although many people are familiar with the Acids, concentrated Good Acids, dilute Good general attributes of this advanced ceramic Alkalis Good-Poor (see Figure 1), an important and frequently Halogens Good-Poor overlooked consideration is that the properties Metals Fair of silicon carbide can be altered by varying the Electrical Properties final compaction method. These alterations can Dielectric constant 40 provide knowledgeable engineers with small Volume resistivity at 25°C (Ohm-cm) 103-105 adjustments in performance that can potentially make a significant difference in the functionality Mechanical Properties of a finished component.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sustainable Approach for Tungsten Carbide Synthesis Using Renewable Biopolymers Monsur Islam Clemson University
    Clemson University TigerPrints Publications Mechanical Engineering 9-2017 A sustainable approach for tungsten carbide synthesis using renewable biopolymers Monsur Islam Clemson University Rodrigo Martinez-Duarte Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/mecheng_pubs Part of the Mechanical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Please use the publisher's recommended citation. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272884217309239 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mechanical Engineering at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A sustainable approach for tungsten carbide synthesis using renewable biopolymers Monsur Islam and Rodrigo Martinez-Duarte∗ Multiscale Manufacturing Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA Abstract Here we present a sustainable, environment-friendly and energy-efficient approach for synthesis of porous tungsten carbide (WC). A biopolymer-metal oxide composite featuring iota-carrageenan, chitin and tungsten trioxide (WO3) was used as the precursor material. The reaction mechanism for the synthesis of WC was estimated using the results from X-ray diffraction characterization (XRD). A synthesis temperature of 1300 ºC and dwell time of 3 hours were found to be the optimum process parameters to obtain WC >98% pure. The grain size, porosity and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area of the synthesized WC were characterized using field emission scanning electron microscopy, high resolution transmission electron microscopy and nitrogen adsorption-desorption. A mesoporous WC was synthesized here with a grain size around 20 nm and BET surface area of 67.03 m2/g.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Low Resistance Low Corrosion Cathode Plate
    Development of a low resistance, low corrosion cathode plate for electrowinning and electrorefining Nigel J. Aslin1*1, Christian Pasten2, Addin Pranowo3, Graham J. Heferen4 1. Glencore Technology, Australia ABSTRACT For nearly 40 years Glencore Technology (formerly Mount Isa Mines Copper Refineries) has been the mainstay supplier of permanent cathode plates to the copper industry with its ISA PROCESS and KIDD PROCESS cathode plates. Improvement to the cathode plate design remains a key area for research, and on-going developments by Glencore Technology have led to the commercialisation of a new design. The ISAKIDD cathode plate is universally suited to both electro-refining and electro- winning bringing major cost efficiencies to the operations through improvements in hanger bar strength, corrosion resistance and electrical conductivity. A variation of the this design uses a ‘steer- horn’ shaped hanger bar to lower the resistance path across the cathode plate giving significant tank- house power savings in electrowinning refineries. Technical aspects and results of commercial trials of the ISAKIDD and ‘HP’ cathode plate are discussed in this paper. A novel new contact system which allows shorting frames to be used with Stainless Steel hanger bars will also be tested. Trial results will demonstrate savings in a typical EW tankhouse of up to 720k USD per year in power costs alone, with further savings in maintenance costs and operational efficiencies. *Corresponding author: Glencore Technology, Technical Manager, c/- Copper Refineries Pty Ltd, Hunter St, Stuart, 4811, QLD, Australia. Phone: +61 418887034. Email: [email protected] 1 INTRODUCTION Glencore Technology were the pioneers of Permanent cathode technology for copper and remain committed to continuous improvement and innovation of the technology forty years later.
    [Show full text]
  • Galvanic Corrosion
    10 GALVANIC CORROSION X. G. ZHANG Teck Metals Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada A. Introduction graphite, are dispersed in a metal, or on a ship, where the B. Definition various components immersed in water are made of different C. Factors in galvanic corrosion metal alloys. In many cases, galvanic corrosion may result in D. Material factors quick deterioration of the metals but, in other cases, the D1. Effects of coupled materials galvanic corrosion of one metal may result in the corrosion D2. Effect of area protection of an attached metal, which is the basis of cathodic D3. Effect of surface condition protection by sacrificial anodes. E. Environmental factors Galvanic corrosion is an extensively investigated subject, E1. Effects of solution as shown in Table 10.1, and is qualitatively well understood E2. Atmospheric environments but, due to its highly complex nature, it has been difficult to E3. Natural waters deal with in a quantitative way until recently. The widespread F. Polarity reversal use of computers and the development of software have made G. Preventive measures great advances in understanding and predicting galvanic H. Beneficial effects of galvanic corrosion corrosion. I. Fundamental considerations I1. Electrode potential and Kirchhoff’s law I2. Analysis B. DEFINITION I3. Polarization and resistance I4. Potential and current distributions When two dissimilar conducting materials in electrical con- References tact with each other are exposed to an electrolyte, a current, called the galvanic current, flows from one to the other. Galvanic corrosion is that part of the corrosion that occurs at the anodic member of such a couple and is directly related to the galvanic current by Faraday’s law.
    [Show full text]
  • Galvanic Corrosion Final
    GALVANIC CORROSION by Stephen C. Dexter, Professor of Applied Science and Marine Biology, (302) 645-4261 Galvanic corrosion, often misnamed “electrolysis,” is one common form of corrosion in marine environments. It occurs Table 1 when two (or more) dissimilar metals are brought into electri- GALVANIC SERIES cal contact under water. When a galvanic couple forms, one of In Flowing Seawater the metals in the couple becomes the anode and corrodes faster than it would all by itself, while the other becomes the cathode Voltage Range of Alloy and corrodes slower than it would alone. Either (or both) metal Alloy vs. Reference Electrode* in the couple may or may not corrode by itself (themselves) in MagnesiumAnodic or -1.60 to -1.63 seawater. When contact with a dissimilar metal is made, how- Active End ever, the self-corrosion rates will change: corrosion of the Zinc -0.98 to -1.03 anode will accelerate; corrosion of the cathode will decelerate Aluminum Alloys -0.70 to -0.90 or even stop. We can use the seawater Galvanic Series, shown Cadmium -0.70 to -0.76 in Table 1, to predict which metal will become the anode and Cast Irons -0.60 to -0.72 how rapidly it will corrode. Steel -0.60 to -0.70 Aluminum Bronze -0.30 to -0.40 The seawater Galvanic Series is a list of metals and alloys Red Brass, Yellow Brass, ranked in order of their tendency to corrode in marine environ- Naval Brass -0.30 to -0.40 ments. If any two metals from the list are coupled together, the Copper -0.28 to -0.36 one closer to the anodic (or active) end of the series, the Lead-Tin Solder (50/50) -0.26 to -0.35 upper end in this case, will be the anode and thus will corrode Admiralty Brass -0.25 to -0.34 faster, while the one toward the cathodic (or noble) end will Manganese Bronze -0.25 to -0.33 corrode slower.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diffusion of Carbon Into Tungsten
    The diffusion of carbon into tungsten Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Withop, Arthur, 1940- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 25/09/2021 09:44:03 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/347554 THE DIFFUSION OF CARBON INTO TUNGSTEN by Arthur Withop A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements .For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1966 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial ful­ fillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library,, Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permis­ sion for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: / r / r ~ t / r t e //Date Professor of Metallurgical.Engineering ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my appreciation to my advisor, Dr0 K 0 L 0 Keating, for his valuable guidance and advice with this project, to Mr, A, W, Stephens for his assist­ ance with the equipment, and to all the graduate students in the Department of Metallurgical Engineering for their encouragement and confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) Is Mechanically Very Similar to Water, but in Addition, Has Material Limitations As a Function of Its Physical and Chemical Properties
    Application Note to the Field Hydrogen Peroxide Application Note Number: 0110-1 Date: October 5, 2001; Revised Jan. 2016 Water can be a challenging fluid to pump with a gear pump due to its low viscosity and the attendant difficulties such as slip and wear. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is mechanically very similar to water, but in addition, has material limitations as a function of its physical and chemical properties. Liquiflo has extensive experience pumping hydrogen peroxide and working around its eccentricities. The materials of construction used for H2O2 must be pure and contain no free nickel which can come in contact with the fluid. Impure materials can cause gassing (by decomposition of H2O2 into oxygen gas and water) similar to when the commercially available 3% solution is poured on a cut. Gassing of peroxide in the concentrations typically used industrially (30-70% is most common) can cause several problems. Gas moving through a system is usually not desirable, but the pump does not like it either. The pump depends on the process fluid to provide film lubrication. All parts have microscopic peaks and valleys, which are known as surface asperities. Forces within the pump are trying to force surfaces together such that the peaks may contact each other to one degree or another, causing heat and wear. The better the film lubrication, the longer the pump will last, all else being equal. Conversely, if the film is degraded or eliminated (such as when a gas is present rather than a liquid), the pump will wear out more quickly, or in extreme cases, fail.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum to Participants JASON 1994 Summer Study
    Hydronnclear Testing and the Comprehensive Test Ban: Memorandum to Participants JASON 1994 Summer Study Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. 1350 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20005 Tel (main): (202) 783-7800 Cochran (direct dial): (202) 624-9329 Paine (direct dial): (202) 624-9350 Fax: (202) 783-5917 INTERNET: [email protected] Although no commonly accepted defInition exists, a "hydronuclear test" may be generally described as a nuclear weapons test, or high-explosive driven criticality experiment, characterized by a nuclear energy release that is insuffIcient to heat the core material to the plasma temperatures that would cause it to explode "like a bomb." In such a test, the TNT equivalent energy release from fission would therefore not exceed the amount released by the chemical high explosive used to compress the fIssile material, and could be considerably ,less. Nuclear-weapon states, and possibly other states, also perform high-explosive driven implosion experiments using fusjon material, although" these' are not nonnally characterized as "hydronuclear tests". Hydronuclear tests can serve a useful role in the development of the full spectrum of unboosted fIssion weapons, including'first generation nuclear weapons of the implosion type with yields in the 5 to 30 kiloton range, more sophisticated designs with yields up to about a megaton, and advanced micro-nuclear weapons with yields of 5 to 500 tons. For pure fIssion weapons hydronuclear tests can be used to:' * optimize the timing of initiation of the
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Background: Tungsten Trioxide (CASRN: 1314-35-8)
    Tungsten trioxide & suboxides SUMMARY OF DATA FOR CHEMICAL SELECTION Tungsten Trioxide & Suboxides BASIS OF NOMINATION TO THE NTP Tungsten trioxide and its suboxides are brought to the attention of the Chemical Selection Working Group because of recent concerns that these substances may be fibrogenic in certain industrial settings. Previously, most information on tungsten compounds was from the cemented tungsten carbide industry. Although hard metal disease in this industry is well known, most effects have been attributed to cobalt. Tungsten oxides were selected for review for several reasons. In the US, all sources of unrefined tungsten are presently imported for preparation of tungsten powder that is used to produce cemented tungsten carbide. Exposure to various tungsten oxides and suboxides occurs in the metallurgical processes used to produce tungsten powder. Recent studies in Sweden have shown that calcination of tungsten oxide (yellow oxide), ammonium paratungstate, and blue oxide (WO2.90) results in the formation of asbestos-like tungsten oxide whiskers that are thought to be much more toxic than tungsten powder. Respirable tungsten oxide fibers with a diameter <0.3 :m have also been found in dust from the hard metal industry. Tungsten oxide uses in the textiles, ceramics, and plastics industries, contribute further to potential worker exposure. No adequate 2-year carcinogenicity studies of tungsten trioxide or its suboxides were found in the available literature. In vitro reports described the fibrous form of tungsten oxide as an inducer of hydroxyl radicals and a cytotoxic agent to human lung cells. INPUT FROM GOVERNMENT AGENCIES/INDUSTRY CSWG member, Dr. Yin-Tak Woo of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provided additional information on the toxicity of tungsten and tungsten compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological Profile for Tungsten
    TUNGSTEN 73 4. CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL INFORMATION 4.1 CHEMICAL IDENTITY Tungsten is a naturally occurring element found in the earth=s surface rocks. Tungsten metal typically does not occur as the free element in nature. Of the more than 20 tungsten-bearing minerals, some of the commonly used commercial ones include feberite (iron tungstate), huebnerite (manganese tungstate), wolframite (iron-manganese tungstate), and scheelite (calcium tungstate). Tungsten appears in Group VIB of the periodic table. Natural tungsten is composed of five stable isotopes: 180W (0.12%), 182W (26.5%), 183W (14.3%), 184W (30.6%), and 186W (28.4%). Twenty-eight radioactive isotopes of tungsten are known; most of these isotopes have short half-lives. Tungsten forms a variety of different compounds, such as tungsten trioxide, tungsten carbide, and ammonium paratungstate (Penrice 1997a). Information regarding the chemical identity of elemental tungsten and tungsten compounds is located in Table 4-1. 4.2 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES Tungsten has several common oxidation states (e.g., W[0], W[2+], W[3+], W[4+], W[5+], and W[6+]). However, tungsten alone has not been observed as a cation. Tungsten is stable, and therefore its most common valence state is +6. The naturally occurring isotopes of tungsten are 180 (0.135%), 182 (26.4%), 183 (14.4%), 184 (30.6%), and 186 (28.4%). Artificial radioactive isotopes of tungsten are 173–179, 181, 185, and 187–189 (O’Neil et al. 2001). Elemental tungsten metal is stable in dry air at room temperature. Above 400 °C, tungsten is susceptible to oxidation. Tungsten is resistant to many chemicals and is also a good electrical conductor (Penrice 1997a).
    [Show full text]