Dale Burk 1936–

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dale Burk 1936– 2018 INDUCTEE Dale Burk 1936– hose closest to him say Dale Burk, who lished a Burk photograph of Brandborg and a Tgrew up in a logging family, “had his boots Wyoming senator viewing a clearcut that resembled in Montana mud and his hands on Tobacco a carpet-bombed landscape. It enraged the nation. Valley lumber.” Few environmental reporters existed then, When family sawyers instinctively know how much less investigative reporting by Montana to use a two-person saw to fell a tree in thick media. Burk broke new ground to inform Monta- stands of dark timber, you learn to pay attention. nans about forest management—catalyzing cru- You take mental notes. You remember things. cial national support for reforms. All these mental traits paid off for Burk, Mon- Harvard took notice and awarded Burk with tana, and the nation. its 1975-76 Nieman Fellowship for journalism. For 10 years, Burk worked at the Missoulian, Burk’s work was indeed controversial but Missoula’s daily newspaper. His dogged pursuit stood the test of time. His work helped spark of a story saw him progress from reporter to passage of the National Forest Management Act columnist, to editor, to editorial-page writer. while he displayed professional courage, and In 1968, his first year at the paper, Burk weathered aggressive criticism, to ensure Monta- drifted toward familiar stories and soon nans, Americans, and the Congress learned the contacted Guy Brandborg, a forester on the truth to provide a better future for our forests. Bitterroot National Forest. His newspaper work also launched a long Both once lived in small communities where career as a conservation advocate via his publish- logging was a primary economic force. Together ing house, Stoneydale Press. For example, his they compared mental notes and remembered book, Great Bear, Wild River, was instrumental in things, especially the families still working in the the 1978 designation of the Great Bear Wilderness woods and timber mills. along the Middle Fork of the Flathead River. Their talks set Burk on a reportorial course in Numerous accolades came Burk’s way, but 1969 that resulted in a series of articles about it’s perhaps most fitting that his local club, the Forest Service clearcutting. His reporting brought Ravalli County Fish & Wildlife Association, national attention to misguided, unsustainable, awarded him with its Lifetime Achievement and economically irrational activities. Burk Award, and that the Missoula Conservation uncovered massive clearcutting, aggressive Community names its annual award for most road-building, terracing, and logging-centric outstanding citizen advocate after Burk. management that gave short shrift to the concept Dale Burk’s lifelong contribution as a conser- of multiple-use. vation leader shaped our outdoor heritage. Burk His groundbreaking reporting continued for and his work serve as reminders that journalists several years. In 1971, The New York Times pub- and a free press are vital to a civil society. # Montana Outdoor Hall of Fame 2018 Inductees | 7.
Recommended publications
  • United States Department of the Interior Geological
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resource potential of national forest RARE II and wilderness areas in Montana Compiled by Christopher E. Williams 1 and Robert C. Pearson2 Open-File Report 84-637 1984 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. 1 Present address 2 Denver, Colorado U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/NEIC Denver, Colorado CONTENTS (See also indices listings, p. 128-131) Page Introduction*........................................................... 1 Beaverhead National Forest............................................... 2 North Big Hole (1-001).............................................. 2 West Pioneer (1-006)................................................ 2 Eastern Pioneer Mountains (1-008)................................... 3 Middle Mountain-Tobacco Root (1-013)................................ 4 Potosi (1-014)...................................................... 5 Madison/Jack Creek Basin (1-549).................................... 5 West Big Hole (1-943)............................................... 6 Italian Peak (1-945)................................................ 7 Garfield Mountain (1-961)........................................... 7 Mt. Jefferson (1-962)............................................... 8 Bitterroot National Forest.............................................. 9 Stony Mountain (LI-BAD)............................................. 9 Allan Mountain (Ll-YAG)............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Collections in the Archives
    Examples of collections and resources supporting research about Land, Land Use, the Environment and Conservation in Montana held at Archives & Special Collections at the Mansfield Library, University of Montana-Missoula A separate list is available for collections with content focused on Forests and the Timber Products Industry. Note: In most cases links are provided from the titles of collections to the guides to those collections. The collections themselves are not digitized and therefore are not yet available online. This list is not comprehensive. Papers of Individuals and Families G. M. Brandborg Papers (1893-1977), Mss 691, 14.5 linear feet Papers of Guy M. "Brandy" Brandborg, long-time employee of the U. S. Forest Service, and Forest Supervisor of the Bitterroot National Forest from 1935-1955. The collection includes files related to Brandborg's interest in and activities related to wilderness, conservation, and watershed protection efforts in Montana, and two memorial scrapbooks documenting his activities in favor of sustainable timber harvesting and against extensive clearcutting. Stewart M. Brandborg Papers (1932-2000), Mss 699, 45.0 linear feet This collection consists of the professional papers of environmental activist Stewart M. Brandborg. A graduate of the University of Montana and the University of Idaho, Brandborg was hired as assistant conservation director for the National Wildlife Federation in 1954. In 1956 he was elected to the governing board of The Wilderness Society and in 1960 was hired as their associate executive director. He served as director of The Wilderness Society from 1964-1977. Brandborg’s papers include correspondence, research files and other documents from his time with The Wilderness Society, as well as material documenting his work with the National Wildlife Federation, the National Park Service, Wilderness Watch, and Friends of the Bitterroot (Montana.) Arnold Bolle Papers (1930-1994), Mss 600, 40.7 linear feet Arnold Bolle was a leading figure in the Montana conservation movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Great American Outdoors Act | Legacy Restoration Fund | Fiscal Year 2021 Projects | Northern Region (R1) Region Forest Or Grassland Project Name State Cong
    Great American Outdoors Act | Legacy Restoration Fund | Fiscal Year 2021 Projects | Northern Region (R1) Region Forest or Grassland Project Name State Cong. District Asset Type Project Description Built in 1962, this Visitor Center last saw updates over 25 years ago, hosts up to 45,000 visitors in a 4-month span. This project will fully renovate both floors to modernize the visitor center and increase usable space. This project will improve management of forests by educating visitors in fire aware practices. The project will improve signage, information and interpretive displays, modernize bathrooms, improve lighting, restore facility HVAC service, and Public Service conduct asbestos abatement. The visitor center provides tours and educational programs to rural schools, 50-60/year R01 Aerial Fire Depot Missoula Smokejumper Visitor Center Renovation MT MT-At Large Facility, totaling approximately 5,000 students. The project will improve ABA/ADA access and site compliance. The project Recreation Site augments visitor center and parachute loft access with interpretive displays and 24/7 accessible exterior storyboards. Work will improve the safety and remove environmental hazards from the Visitor Center. Work will be conducted in partnership with volunteers and museums to improve historical interpretation. The project has local support from MT Governor's Office of Outdoor Recreation via 8/26/20 letter. This project will recondition 500 miles on 54 roads across the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest. The recreation and commercial use such as timber haul and outfitter and guides are essential to the rural communities in southwest Recondition 500 Miles of Road in the Mountains of Southwest R01 Beaverhead-Deerlodge MT MT-At Large Road Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumulative Effects Analysis for Issuance of Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex Outfitter and Guide Permits, April 2005
    Cumulative Effects Analysis for Issuance of Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex Outfitter and Guide Permits, April 2005 The majority of environmental effects associated outfitter and guide use are specific to the activities permitted under each permit. These include such effects as ground disturbance associated with established camps. In addition, there are social issues and indicators that have a role with all users in the wilderness both outfitter publics and non-outfitted publics. These effects are considered and disclosed in individual analyses prepared for each permit. However, some resource values span large geographic areas and can be affected by groups of, or all of the proposed permitted activities. This cumulative effects analysis is prepared to disclose those cumulative effects and is intended to be considered and incorporated into those individual analysis for which they are identified. Proposed Action: The Flathead, Lewis & Clark, Helena, and Lolo National Forests are preparing to re-issue special use permits for outfitting and guiding in the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex (BMWC). The complex consists of the Great Bear, Bob Marshall and Scapegoat Wilderness Areas, for a total of 1.8 million acres in North Central Montana. Background: Outfitter use in the BMWC appears to have begun in about 1919, when Joe Murphy of Ovando packed hunters into the South Fork of the Flathead River area. The number of outfitters operating in the BMWC increased over time until the number was capped in 1981 at 45. Most of these operations have been in existence for 25-65 years, some longer. Most of these permits are due to expire on April 30, 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridges to a New Era Report
    BRIDGES TO A NEW ERA: A REPORT ON THE PAST, PRESENT, AND POTENTIAL FUTURE OF TRIBAL CO- MANAGEMENT ON FEDERAL PUBLIC LANDS Monte Mills & Martin Nie September 2020 Blackfeet protest of oil and gas leasing in the Badger-Two Medicine area, Montana, 1986. Photo courtesy and used with the permission of Dylan DesRosier, who reserves all other rights. Please cite as: Monte Mills & Martin Nie, Bridges to a New Era; A Report on the Past, Present, and Potential Future of Tribal Co- Management on Federal Public Lands, [page] (Missoula, MT: Margery Hunter Brown Indian Law Clinic/Bolle Center for People and Forests, University of Montana, 2020). Authors’ Note: The foregoing citation provides our institutional affiliations for identification purposes. In researching, writing, and producing this Report, we are writing for ourselves and not as representatives or on behalf of the Alexander Blewett III School of Law, the University of Montana, or the Montana University System. INTRODUCTION Fifty years ago, the United States took important but divergent steps to fundamentally reshape its relationship with Native Nations and its management of federal public lands.1 On July 8, 1970, President Nixon delivered a Special Message to the Congress on Indian Affairs.2 The President’s message marked the culmination of a years-long and major shift in federal Indian policy and the longstanding federal trust obligations toward tribes. For the first time, President Nixon’s message formally and expressly rejected the United States’ prior approach of forced termination of those obligations in favor of tribally-defined priorities, including the promotion of tribal sovereignty.
    [Show full text]
  • Purpose. Sec. 3. Designation of Wild and Scenic River
    1 Title: To Amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to Designate Important Headwaters Streams in 2 the Crown of the Continent and Greater Yellowstone in Montana as components of the Wild and 3 Scenic Rivers System. 4 5 6 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in 7 Congress assembled, 8 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 9 This Act may be cited as the “Montana Headwaters Security Act”. 10 SEC. 2. FINDINGS; PURPOSE. 11 (a) Findings.—Congress finds that— 12 (1) The streams designated herein are cherished by the people of Montana and visitors 13 from across the United States for their clean and copious water, abundant fish and wildlife, 14 spectacular natural settings, contribution to irrigation for agriculture, and outstanding 15 recreational opportunities; 16 (2) Recreational activities (including fishing, hunting, camping, paddling, hiking, 17 swimming, rock climbing, and wildlife watching) on these streams and the surrounding land 18 generate millions of dollars annually for the local economy; 19 (3) Montana’s multi-billion dollar agricultural industry thrives on the availability of clean 20 water that originates in headwaters streams, often found on public lands; 21 (4) All streams noted herein — 22 (A) are national treasures; 23 (B) possess outstandingly remarkable values; and 24 (C) merit the high level of protection afforded by the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act 25 (16 U.S.C. 1271 et seq.) in order to maintain the benefits provided, as described in 26 paragraphs (1), (2) and (3), for future generations to enjoy; and 27 (5) Designation of select public land segments of these streams under the Wild and 28 Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Metcalf (1911–1978) Public Servant and Statesman “No U.S
    Lee Metcalf (1911–1978) Public Servant and Statesman “No U.S. senator – ever – was more committed to sound resource management. And no present or former senator can proffer a record of accomplishments to match that commitment.” Dale Burk, author and journalist, 1999 ee Warren Metcalf was born in Stevensville, from the state’s First Congressional District. He Montana on January 28, 1911. Throughout his life ran for the U.S. Senate in 1960 and was re-elected Metcalf was a committed public servant passion- to the Senate in 1966 and 1972. ately working for the people of Montana and the Throughout his career Metcalf worked tirelessly protection of her resources. to protect the interests of the working people and Metcalf attended public schools in the Bitter Root family farmers. He was an early sponsor of legis- Valley, went on to receive two degrees from Stan- lation for clean water, Federal aid to education, ford University, and then received his law degree and reclamation of strip-mined land. He became a from the Montana State University Law School. guardian of the public interest in regard to utili- lHe was admitted to the Montana bar in 1936. In ties and was an advocate of congressional reform 1935 he married Donna Hoover of Wallace, Idaho, and budgetary control. a UM journalism graduate. She was to be his clos- Metcalf was intensely concerned with preserva- est friend and advisor throughout his life. tion of natural resources and was instrumental He was elected to the Montana Legislature in in creating the Montana Wilderness Study Act, 1937 and served as assistant attorney general the Missouri Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and the from 1937 to 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • WM Summer 05 Layout
    e g WINTER 2007 r o e G n y l ILD ONTANA i WWIILLDD MMOONNTTAANNAA r W M a M Newsletter of the Montana Wilderness Association Keeping it wild since 1958 A Shared Vision for the Scotchman Peaks by Phil Hough WE WHO ARE FORTUNATE ENOUGH to live in leave marks on a map but none on the lips. northern Idaho and western Montana know Sometimes locals agree on a common name so that we inhabit a very special place. The Forest they know where to meet up. But they whisper Service calls it the “Scotchman Peaks Inventoried these names, because we take away a little wild- Roadless Area (IRA).” But that dry, bureaucratic ness the first time we name something—and the term is misleading. Much of the Scotchmans people who live here know it. This area remains hasn’t truly been “inventoried” at all—it hasn’t a wild place, not a series of line items in an been catalogued, defined, and entered as a line inventory. And that is its beauty, its specialness, item on a list. Many of the tallest peaks don’t even and its promise. It’s why the Scotchmans have names. Most of the basins, passes or ponds deserves to be protected, now and for all time. continued on page 4... h g u o H l i h P Non-Profit Org. Montana Wilderness Association U.S. Postage 30 S. Ewing, Helena, MT 59601 PA I D Permit #151 Great Falls, MT P R E S I D E N T ’ S L E T T E R CHANGE I am honored and excited to say Executive Director, and a At the same time, we’re moving Deploying Hello as the new President of restructured staff.
    [Show full text]
  • HR 2473 IH 3 1 (4) Montanans and Those Interested in Mon- 2 Tana’S Wildlands Have Been Fully Involved in the For- 3 Mulation of This Wilderness Proposal
    I 103D CONGRESS 1ST SESSION H. R. 2473 To designate certain National Forest lands in the State of Montana as wilderness, to release other National Forest lands in the State of Mon- tana for multiple use management, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JUNE 18, 1993 Mr. WILLIAMS introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Agriculture and Natural Resources A BILL To designate certain National Forest lands in the State of Montana as wilderness, to release other National For- est lands in the State of Montana for multiple use man- agement, and for other purposes. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 4 This Act may be referred to as the ``Round 16 of 5 the Montana Wilderness Act 1993''. 6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES. 7 (a) FINDINGS.ÐThe Congress finds thatÐ 1 2 1 (1) Many areas of undeveloped National Forest 2 System lands in the State of Montana possess out- 3 standing natural characteristics which give them 4 high value as wilderness and will, if properly pre- 5 served, contribute as an enduring resource of wild 6 land for the benefit of the American people. 7 (2) The existing Department of Agriculture 8 Land and Resource Management Plans for Forest 9 System lands in the State of Montana have identi- 10 fied areas which, on the basis of their land form, 11 ecosystem, associated wildlife, and location will help 12 to fulfill the National Forest System's share of a 13 quality National Wilderness Preservation System.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild and Scenic River Eligibility Report
    Wild and Scenic River Eligibility Report Second Edition, August 20, 2012 Prepared by: Kevin Colburn American Whitewater Scott Bosse American Rivers Michael Fiebig American Rivers Chris Frissell Pacific Rivers Council Brianna Randall Clark Fork Coalition Scott Christensen Greater Yellowstone Coalition Introduction Through the national forests of Montana flow some of the most beautiful and ecologically vital rivers and streams in the nation. Born from high elevation glaciers and snowpack, these cold, clean waters are home to a host of native fish species including westslope and Yellowstone cutthroat trout and federally threatened bull trout. Their canyons and valleys provide habitat to a stunning array of wildlife ranging from grizzly bears and Canada lynx to prized big game animals like elk, deer and moose. Anglers, paddlers and hikers come from across the country and around the world to explore Montana’s incomparable rivers and streams. For many residents, their backyard rivers and streams provide the water they drink, the wildlife they hunt, and the scenery that enriches their lives. The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act was passed to protect the ecological and social values of our nation’s last best rivers. The Act serves as a tool for agencies to recognize and prioritize special rivers and streams under their management. Agencies are charged with determining which steams are “eligible” for Wild and Scenic designation: “A wild, scenic or recreational river area eligible to be included in the system is a free-flowing stream and the related adjacent land area that possesses one or more of the values referred to in section 1271 of this title.
    [Show full text]
  • Use Patterns and Visitor Characteristics, Attitudes, and Preferences in Nine Wilderness and Other Roadless Areas
    T This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. USE PATTERNS AND VISITOR CHARACTERISTICS, ATTITUDES AND PREFERENCES IN NINE WILDERNESS AND OTHER ROADLESS AREAS Robert C. Lucas USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-253 INTERMOUNT AIN FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOREST SERVICE USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-253 July 1980 USE PATTERNS AND VISITOR CHARACTERISTICS, ATTITUDES, AND PREFERENCES IN NINE WILDERNESS AND OTHER ROADLESS AREAS ROBERT C. LUCAS INTER.MOUNTAIN FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION U. S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Ogden, Utah 84401 THE AUTHOR ROBERT C. LUCAS is a Principal Research Social Scientist and Project Leader of the Wilderness Management Research Work Unit, located at the Forestry Sciences Laboratory on the University of Montana campus at Missoula. He has been in this position since 1967. Before 1967 he was with the North Central Forest Exper­ iment Station in Minnesota. Dr. Lucas received his B.S. in secondary education-social science (1957) and his M.A. (1959) and Ph.D. (1962) in geography from the University of Minnesota. He has authored numerous publications dealing with wilderness management. RESEARCH SUMMARY A comparison of use patterns and visitor characteristics among nine wilderness and other roadless areas showed similarities for many characteristics and sharp differences for others. Differences were most pronounced for use patterns, such as length of stay, method of travel, and activities, and were least noticeable for visitors' attitudes and preferences. Overall, satisfaction was high, but many visitors felt that conditions were deteriorating.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Fork of the Flathead River Originates in the Heart of the Bob Marshall Wilderness
    The Middle Fork The Middle Fork of the Flathead River originates in the heart of the Bob Marshall Wilderness. The upper section of the river offers primitive recreation in a wilderness setting. From the headwaters to Schafer Meadows, a narrow channel and log jams make the river generally unsuitable for floating. Most trips start from Schafer Meadows, which can be reached by trail or by aircraft. The float season normally lasts from mid-May through mid-July, with peak runoff in late May. Numerous Class IV and V rapids can make the trip extremely difficult during peak flows. Be prepared for periods of cold wet weather. The lower section of the river offers more accessible recreation in a more developed setting. Flathead National Forest and private lands border the south bank, river left, and Glacier National Park borders the bank on the north, river right. Please respect private landowners’ rights. The float season on the lower Middle Fork extends from mid-May to early September. Numerous rapids ranging from Class II to Class IV make for a challenging trip during high water. Several public access sites provide many options for day floats. Please Remember: • The party size in the Great Bear Wilderness is 15 people per party. • Store all attractants in a bear resistant manner, in an approved container, in your vehicle, or suspend in a tree at least 10 feet up and 4 feet out. • The Middle Fork’s water is incredibly pure, please help keep it that way for the west slope cutthroat and bull trout. AVERAGE JULY FLOAT Access Dist(Mi) Time(H) Class ¯ TEAKETTLE TO 15 3.5 II BLANKENSHIP BRIDGE BLANKENSHIP TO 5.5 2.5 III BRIDGE WEST GLACIER TO 9 2.5 II-IV WEST MOCCASIN CREEK !" GLACIER ! ! MOCCASIN CR TO 7 3 LOGJAMS CASCADILLA 9 7 CASCADILLA! 8 TO 12 3 III-IV "Columbia Falls 6 ! PAOLA PAOLA TEAKETTLE ! 5 TO 10.5 3.25 III-IV ¬206 BEAR CREEK /2 4 ! BEAR CREEK & 1 - RIVER MAP NUMBER ¬35 3 - DIRECTION OF FLOAT & 2 !SCHAFER ¬83 1 Regulations Pursuant to 36 CFR 261 (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) Middle Fork Stay Limit Boats Motor 10 h.p.
    [Show full text]