WM Summer 05 Layout

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WM Summer 05 Layout e g WINTER 2007 r o e G n y l ILD ONTANA i WWIILLDD MMOONNTTAANNAA r W M a M Newsletter of the Montana Wilderness Association Keeping it wild since 1958 A Shared Vision for the Scotchman Peaks by Phil Hough WE WHO ARE FORTUNATE ENOUGH to live in leave marks on a map but none on the lips. northern Idaho and western Montana know Sometimes locals agree on a common name so that we inhabit a very special place. The Forest they know where to meet up. But they whisper Service calls it the “Scotchman Peaks Inventoried these names, because we take away a little wild- Roadless Area (IRA).” But that dry, bureaucratic ness the first time we name something—and the term is misleading. Much of the Scotchmans people who live here know it. This area remains hasn’t truly been “inventoried” at all—it hasn’t a wild place, not a series of line items in an been catalogued, defined, and entered as a line inventory. And that is its beauty, its specialness, item on a list. Many of the tallest peaks don’t even and its promise. It’s why the Scotchmans have names. Most of the basins, passes or ponds deserves to be protected, now and for all time. continued on page 4... h g u o H l i h P Non-Profit Org. Montana Wilderness Association U.S. Postage 30 S. Ewing, Helena, MT 59601 PA I D Permit #151 Great Falls, MT P R E S I D E N T ’ S L E T T E R CHANGE I am honored and excited to say Executive Director, and a At the same time, we’re moving Deploying Hello as the new President of restructured staff. Significantly, intently toward the successful fruition Montana Wilderness Association. during those four years the organi- of our Wilderness campaigns. We are Our organization was born in 1958 in zation grew in political savvy and in a very purposively and strategically New Skills, the spirit of such wilderness pioneers sharper focus on the acquisition of aiming at Wilderness legislation in the as Bob Marshall and Aldo Leopold, permanent protection—Wilderness!— near future. The time for lamenting Going Back and we’ve been led along the way by for our remaining roadless lands. the “Wilderness Drought” has passed. such farsighted lovers of wilderness My wife, Lynne, and I came to Now is the time for making the to Basics as Cecil Garland, Doris Milner and Montana in 1980 and organizational changes Tom “Hobnail” Edwards. MWA has have spent our entire These vast, quiet spaces, and creating the new epitomized and will always epitomize adult lives here. Our where we can still go attitudes that will end grassroots activism; we were instru- son, Joseph IV, was the drought. That goal By Joseph Scalia III mental in the passage of the 1964 born and raised in to touch our roots and is realizable, and near. President, Montana Wilderness Act that protected 3.4 Montana. We have learn who we are—these We can almost feel it. Wilderness Association million acres of Montana wildlands always lived close spaces are a priceless gift As we move towards “in perpetuity.” We’ve accomplished to our wildlands, to humanity and are our Wilderness, grassroots a lot and are rightfully proud of our wondrous places that work remains crucial history. Yet there still exist in Montana have defined and responsibility to protect. not only to our identity, today 6.4 million acres of unprotected enriched us. These but to our success. wilderness, lands that face ever- vast, quiet spaces, where we can Member activists across the state growing encroachments on their still go to touch our roots and learn are deeply engaged in wilderness wild character. These pristine but who we are—these spaces are a campaigns, watching over and vulnerable landscapes are our priceless gift to humanity and are guarding lands not yet protected by inspiration, and our challenge. our responsibility to protect. the 1964 Wilderness Act. Our State In December we said a fond good- MWA understands the need for Council is composed of grassroots bye to Gerry Jennings as she closed humans and all other species, for wild folk, local activists who have volun- her four-year term as President at our lands and peopled lands, to exist teered their services to MWA’s Annual Convention. Gerry’s term saw harmoniously on the planet and in governing board. While we have many changes in MWA, including a our state. We’re seeking collaborative changed with changing times, revamped State Council, a new solutions that respect diverse interests our identity and essence not only in ways that are fair and equitable. remain, but march forward! This letter was sent to Montana Wilderness Association members as an email E X E C U T I V E D I R E C T O R ’ S M E S S A G E message on November 30. We repeat it here for those members who didn’t receive it. As MWA’s President from 2002 to 2006, Gerry Jennings has been instrumental in the growth, reorganization, and great changes that MWA has been going through. She talks about the necessity for change, and how hard it And Aspens Change in the Fall… can be—but the ways in which change can bring new hope and dedication, as well…. by Tim Baker CHANGE You can choose to change or be focusing our staff resources where Dear fellow Montana Wilderness Association member: changed. Either way, change is they will make the most difference, inevitable. creating more opportunities for It is with excitement and a measure of sadness that I bring you news of changes at Montana The Montana Wilderness more success. Wilderness Association. Association is choosing to change, We’re primarily focusing on Over the next few months, MWA will be restructuring our staff so that we are better able to to better focus our resources on three areas that currently offer the conserve Montana’s special places through local, grassroots efforts. Sadly, this means that permanently protecting those most promise for new Wilderness— our 48-year-old organization will close three field offices and reduce staff. special places that define Montana. the wild country of Beaverhead- Wilderness! Deerlodge National Forest, the We are so grateful to our staff for their hard work and dedication for so many years. We are The most recent changes in magnificent Rocky Mountain saddened to lose valuable members of our team. As you can imagine, the decision to close staff structure are the culmina- Front, and the awe-inspiring E these offices was difficult, but one that we feel is in the best interest of our organization CHANG tion of a process that began Scotchman Peaks. and Montana’s wild places. over five years ago—when the Our work to help local State Council first embarked on communities protect local land- For more than 48 years, Montana Wilderness Association has engaged thousands of grass- a serious path of introspection scapes will continue. Our chapter roots volunteers to protect Montana’s special places. Together, we’ve helped preserve places and a commitment to become a structure will continue to play like the Scapegoat, the Mission Mountains, the Absaroka-Beartooth and others. stronger force for Wilderness. a vital role, as wellsprings of This look inward raised some volunteer energy, support, and Over the last few years, we have devoted extra resources to engaging members in the hard questions, about our capacity community connection. The clear development of Forest Service plans, such as the Gallatin and Lewis and Clark National Forest and how we do our work to obtain emphasis for our staff resources travel plans. Frankly, we’ve been dipping into our bank account to do this. Now, the council new permanent protections for our will be to permanently protect has decided it’s time to start building up our bank account again, instead of tapping it. favorite places. We realized that our special priority areas through we needed to adapt to changing new Wilderness designation. As these processes wind down, MWA is shifting its resources back to its core mission: times to better accomplish our Our staff is hard working and protecting Montana’s special places. core mission. passionate about their work, and These efforts have required we are grateful for their commit- To that end, our Council voted unanimously to revise the organization’s staff structure. Doing so countless hours from volunteers— ment to wild Montana. These will reduce our annual budget from $1.1 million in 2006 to $950,000 in 2007. Our full-time staff including State Council leaders, changes in structure affect every- will go from 16 to 13 and field offices in Dillon, Billings, and Bozeman will close as of February. chapter representatives, and other one, and we are sad to lose What’s the goal of this? Simple: Permanent protection for Montana’s most treasured places, MWA members. valuable members of our team. But that’s nothing new. For A unanimous Council concluded starting with the Rocky Mountain Front, the wild country of the Beaverhead-Deerlodge nearly 50 years, thousands of that these changes are in the best National Forest, and Scotchman Peaks on the Kootenai. With the changes, we will continue grassroots volunteers have been interests of MWA and Montana’s to serve our members across the state and local chapters in Billings, Bozeman and elsewhere, the powerhouse of MWA—indeed, most special places. because we fully understand that our members give us our strength and our best ideas.
Recommended publications
  • Trapper's Cabin Ranch
    TRAPPER’S CABIN RANCH Montana is known as “The Last Best Place” - an appropriate term for one of the least developed and least populated states in the Lower 48. Within Montana, there are incredibly beautiful places, untouched by development, such as the Bob Marshall, Great Bear and Lee Metcalf Wilderness areas. In particular, the Lee Metcalf Wilderness, is part of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE), which is one of the few remaining, nearly intact ecosystems left on the Earth. Strategically located, Trap- per’s Cabin Ranch is a complete section of land (640+/- acres) totally surrounded by public land, and is within one mile west and north of the boundary of the Taylor Hilgard unit of the Lee Metcalf Wilderness. The ranch was purchased the 1930’s, from what is now the Burlington Northern Railroad, by Dr. Caroline McGill, the co-founder of the Museum of the Rockies, which is located on the campus of Montana State University in Bozeman. Subsequently ownership passed to the Dr. McGills family, until it was pur- chased in 1965 by the present owners. Trapper’s Cabin Ranch offers one of the most authentic connections to nature that exists in the en- tire country, with solid buildings reminiscent of an earlier time, in a place that cannot be duplicated. Often the term “legacy” is used when describing a property - in reality not many places qualify, but this is a legacy property where four generations of the same family have loved, laughed, recreated and created a place almost untouched by anything except nature. Lightning Creek, a major tributary to the West Gallatin River begins in the high elevations of the Lee Metcalf Wilderness and flows for over a mile through the heart of Trapper’s Cabin Ranch.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping
    Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping Summary Yellowstone National Park This document summarizes the results of a geologic resource evaluation scoping session that was held at Yellowstone National Park on May 16–17, 2005. The NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD) organized this scoping session in order to view and discuss the park’s geologic resources, address the status of geologic maps and digitizing, and assess resource management issues and needs. In addition to GRD staff, participants included park staff and cooperators from the U.S. Geological Survey and Colorado State University (table 1). Table 1. Participants of Yellowstone’s GRE Scoping Session Name Affiliation Phone E-Mail Bob Volcanologist, USGS–Menlo Park 650-329-5201 [email protected] Christiansen Geologist/GRE Program GIS Lead, NPS Tim Connors 303-969-2093 [email protected] Geologic Resources Division Data Stewardship Coordinator, Greater Rob Daley 406-994-4124 [email protected] Yellowstone Network Supervisory Geologist, Yellowstone Hank Heasler 307-344-2441 [email protected] National Park Geologist, NPS Geologic Resources Bruce Heise 303-969-2017 [email protected] Division Cheryl Geologist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-2208 [email protected] Jaworowski Katie Geologist/Senior Research Associate, 970-586-7243 [email protected] KellerLynn Colorado State University Branch Chief, NPS Geologic Resources Carol McCoy 303-969-2096 [email protected] Division Ken Pierce Surficial Geologist, USGS–Bozeman 406-994-5085 [email protected] Supervisory GIS Specialist, Yellowstone Anne Rodman 307-344-7381 [email protected] National Park Shannon GIS Specialist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-7381 [email protected] Savage Monday, May 16, involved a welcome to Yellowstone National Park and an introduction to the Geologic Resource Evaluation (GRE) Program, including status of reports and digital maps.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Geological
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resource potential of national forest RARE II and wilderness areas in Montana Compiled by Christopher E. Williams 1 and Robert C. Pearson2 Open-File Report 84-637 1984 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. 1 Present address 2 Denver, Colorado U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/NEIC Denver, Colorado CONTENTS (See also indices listings, p. 128-131) Page Introduction*........................................................... 1 Beaverhead National Forest............................................... 2 North Big Hole (1-001).............................................. 2 West Pioneer (1-006)................................................ 2 Eastern Pioneer Mountains (1-008)................................... 3 Middle Mountain-Tobacco Root (1-013)................................ 4 Potosi (1-014)...................................................... 5 Madison/Jack Creek Basin (1-549).................................... 5 West Big Hole (1-943)............................................... 6 Italian Peak (1-945)................................................ 7 Garfield Mountain (1-961)........................................... 7 Mt. Jefferson (1-962)............................................... 8 Bitterroot National Forest.............................................. 9 Stony Mountain (LI-BAD)............................................. 9 Allan Mountain (Ll-YAG)............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation in Yellowstone National Park Final Report on the COVER Wolverine Tracks in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
    Wolverine Conservation in Yellowstone National Park Final Report ON THE COVER Wolverine tracks in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Photo by Jason Wilmot. Wolverine Conservation in Yellowstone National Park Final Report Authors John Squires Kerry Murphy US Forest Service US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Jackson Ranger District 800 East Beckwith Avenue PO Box 25 Missoula, Montana 59801 Jackson, Wyoming 83001 [email protected] [email protected] (formerly Yellowstone Center for Resources, With contributions from Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming) Robert M. Inman Wildlife Conservation Society Jason Wilmot Wolverine Program Field Office Northern Rockies Conservation Cooperative 222 East Main Street PO Box 2705 Lone Elk 3B Jackson, Wyoming 83001 Ennis, Montana 59729 [email protected] [email protected] Jeff Copeland Mark L. Packila US Forest Service Wildlife Conservation Society Rocky Mountain Research Station Wolverine Program Field Office 800 East Beckwith Avenue 222 East Main Street Missoula, Montana 59801 Lone Elk 3B [email protected] Ennis, Montana 59729 [email protected] Dan Tyers US Forest Service Doug McWhirter Gardiner Ranger District Wyoming Game and Fish Regional Office PO Box 5 2820 State Highway 120 Gardiner, Montana 59030 Cody, Wyoming 82414 [email protected] National Park Service Yellowstone National Park Yellowstone Center for Resources Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming YCR-2011-02 March 2011 Suggested citation: Murphy, K., J. Wilmot, J. Copeland, D. Tyers, J. Squires, R. M. Inman, M. L. Packila, D. McWhirter. 2011. Wolverine conservation in Yellowstone National Park: Final report. YCR-2011-02. National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Yellowstone Center for Resources, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Collections in the Archives
    Examples of collections and resources supporting research about Land, Land Use, the Environment and Conservation in Montana held at Archives & Special Collections at the Mansfield Library, University of Montana-Missoula A separate list is available for collections with content focused on Forests and the Timber Products Industry. Note: In most cases links are provided from the titles of collections to the guides to those collections. The collections themselves are not digitized and therefore are not yet available online. This list is not comprehensive. Papers of Individuals and Families G. M. Brandborg Papers (1893-1977), Mss 691, 14.5 linear feet Papers of Guy M. "Brandy" Brandborg, long-time employee of the U. S. Forest Service, and Forest Supervisor of the Bitterroot National Forest from 1935-1955. The collection includes files related to Brandborg's interest in and activities related to wilderness, conservation, and watershed protection efforts in Montana, and two memorial scrapbooks documenting his activities in favor of sustainable timber harvesting and against extensive clearcutting. Stewart M. Brandborg Papers (1932-2000), Mss 699, 45.0 linear feet This collection consists of the professional papers of environmental activist Stewart M. Brandborg. A graduate of the University of Montana and the University of Idaho, Brandborg was hired as assistant conservation director for the National Wildlife Federation in 1954. In 1956 he was elected to the governing board of The Wilderness Society and in 1960 was hired as their associate executive director. He served as director of The Wilderness Society from 1964-1977. Brandborg’s papers include correspondence, research files and other documents from his time with The Wilderness Society, as well as material documenting his work with the National Wildlife Federation, the National Park Service, Wilderness Watch, and Friends of the Bitterroot (Montana.) Arnold Bolle Papers (1930-1994), Mss 600, 40.7 linear feet Arnold Bolle was a leading figure in the Montana conservation movement.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historic Agreement for the Kootenai from the President and Executive Director
    WINTER 2016 k c i r d n e H m i K A HISTORIC AGREEMENT FOR THE KOOTENAI FROM THE PRESIDENT AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THE ANTIDOTE TO THE ANTI-PUBLIC LANDS MOVEMENT: FINDING COMMON GROUND AND WORKING TOGETHER Montana Wilderness Association works with communities to protect Montana’s wilderness heritage, quiet beauty, and outdoor traditions, now and for future generations. It’s been hard to miss the headlines lately about armed extremists and radical politicians trying to dismantle our national public lands legacy and take those lands away from the American people. Lee Boman, OFFICERS COUNCIL MEMBERS But those pushing this agenda never anticipated how much MWA President Lee Boman, Seeley Lake Yve Bardwell, Choteau Allison Linville, Missoula Bernard Rose, Billings Americans, Westerners in particular, value public lands. In January, President Barb Harris, Helena Addrien Marx, Seeley Lake Greg Schatz, Columbia Falls Colorado College released its annual bipartisan Conservation in Mark Hanson, Missoula Steve Holland, Bozeman Charlie O’Leary, Butte Patti Steinmuller, Bozeman President Elect Gerry Jennings, Great Falls Rick Potts, Missoula Alan Weltzien, Dillon the West Poll showing that voters in seven Mountain West states Wayne Gardella, Helena Len Kopec, Augusta Debo Powers, Polebridge Jo Ann Wright, Great Falls overwhelmingly oppose efforts to weaken and seize public lands. Treasurer John Larson, Kalispell It also showed that Westerners strongly support people working together to find common-ground solutions to public land challenges. HELENA OFFICE 80 S. Warren, Helena, MT 59601 • 406-443-7350 • [email protected] Brian Sybert, Ext. 104 Denny Lester, Ext. 105 Carl Deitchman, Ext. 104 Ted Brewer, Ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Metcalf and Spanish Peaks Wilderness Areas (2) Max S
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Max S. Baucus Speeches Archives and Special Collections 2-20-1981 Lee Metcalf and Spanish Peaks Wilderness Areas (2) Max S. Baucus Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/baucus_speeches Recommended Citation Baucus, Max S., "Lee Metcalf and Spanish Peaks Wilderness Areas (2)" (February 20, 1981). Max S. Baucus Speeches. 163. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/baucus_speeches/163 This Speech is brought to you for free and open access by the Archives and Special Collections at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Max S. Baucus Speeches by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Printing, Graphics & Direct Mail ONBASE SYSTEM Indexing Form Senator * or Department*: BAUCUS Instructions: Prepare one form for insertion at the beginning of each record series. Prepare and insert additional forms at points that you want to index. For example: at the beginning of a new folder, briefing book, topic, project, or date sequence. Record Type*: Speeches & Remarks MONTH/YEAR of Records*: February-1 981 (Example: JANUARY-2003) (1) Subject*: Lee Metcalf & Spanish Peaks Wilderness Areas (select subject from controlled vocabulary, if your office has one) (2) Subject* DOCUMENT DATE*: 02/20/1981 (Example: 01/12/1966) * "required information" CLICK TO PRINT BAUCUS STATEMENT BY SENATOR MAX BAUCUS February 20, 1981 THE LEE METCALF AND SPANISH PEAKS WILDERNESS AREAS Fifteen-.years ago., Senator Lee Metcalf wrote to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Great American Outdoors Act | Legacy Restoration Fund | Fiscal Year 2021 Projects | Northern Region (R1) Region Forest Or Grassland Project Name State Cong
    Great American Outdoors Act | Legacy Restoration Fund | Fiscal Year 2021 Projects | Northern Region (R1) Region Forest or Grassland Project Name State Cong. District Asset Type Project Description Built in 1962, this Visitor Center last saw updates over 25 years ago, hosts up to 45,000 visitors in a 4-month span. This project will fully renovate both floors to modernize the visitor center and increase usable space. This project will improve management of forests by educating visitors in fire aware practices. The project will improve signage, information and interpretive displays, modernize bathrooms, improve lighting, restore facility HVAC service, and Public Service conduct asbestos abatement. The visitor center provides tours and educational programs to rural schools, 50-60/year R01 Aerial Fire Depot Missoula Smokejumper Visitor Center Renovation MT MT-At Large Facility, totaling approximately 5,000 students. The project will improve ABA/ADA access and site compliance. The project Recreation Site augments visitor center and parachute loft access with interpretive displays and 24/7 accessible exterior storyboards. Work will improve the safety and remove environmental hazards from the Visitor Center. Work will be conducted in partnership with volunteers and museums to improve historical interpretation. The project has local support from MT Governor's Office of Outdoor Recreation via 8/26/20 letter. This project will recondition 500 miles on 54 roads across the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest. The recreation and commercial use such as timber haul and outfitter and guides are essential to the rural communities in southwest Recondition 500 Miles of Road in the Mountains of Southwest R01 Beaverhead-Deerlodge MT MT-At Large Road Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Sedan Quadrangle, Gallatin And
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC INVESTIGATIONS SERIES I–2634 Version 2.1 A 25 20 35 35 80 rocks generally fall in the range of 3.2–2.7 Ga. (James and Hedge, 1980; Mueller and others, 1985; Mogk and Henry, Pierce, K.L., and Morgan, L.A., 1992, The track of the Yellowstone hot spot—Volcanism, faulting, and uplift, in Link, 30 5 25 CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS 10 30 Kbc Billman Creek Formation—Grayish-red, grayish-green and gray, volcaniclastic mudstone and siltstone ၤ Phosphoria and Quadrant Formations; Amsden, Snowcrest Range and Madison Groups; and Three Overturned 45 20 10 30 20 P r 1988; Wooden and others, 1988; Mogk and others, 1992), although zircons have been dated as old as 3.96 Ga from P.K., Kuntz, M.A., and Platt, L.B., eds., Regional geology of eastern Idaho and western Wyoming: Geological 40 Ksms 45 Kh interbedded with minor volcanic sandstone and conglomerate and vitric tuff. Unit is chiefly 30 30 25 45 45 Forks Formation, Jefferson Dolomite, Maywood Formation, Snowy Range Formation, Pilgrim Ksl 5 15 50 SURFICIAL DEPOSITS quartzites in the Beartooth Mountains (Mueller and others, 1992). The metamorphic fabric of these basement rocks has Society of America Memoir 179, p. 1–53. 15 20 15 Kbc volcaniclastic mudstone and siltstone that are gray and green in lower 213 m and grayish red above; Estimated 40 Qc 5 15 Qoa Limestone, Park Shale, Meagher Limestone, Wolsey Shale, and Flathead Sandstone, undivided in some cases exerted a strong control on the geometry of subsequent Proterozoic and Phanerozoic structures, Piombino, Joseph, 1979, Depositional environments and petrology of the Fort Union Formation near Livingston, 15 25 Ksa 50 calcareous, containing common carbonaceous material and common yellowish-brown-weathering 60 40 20 15 15 (Permian, Pennsylvanian, Mississippian, Devonian, Ordovician, and Cambrian)—Limestone, Ksa 20 10 10 45 particularly Laramide folds (Miller and Lageson, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents I. Foreword
    TABLE OF CONTENTS I. FOREWORD................................................................................................................ 4 II. REGIONAL SETTING................................................................................................. 5 III. EXISTING LAND USES............................................................................................. 7 IV. DISTRICT HISTORY ................................................................................................. 9 A. THE BIG SKY, INC. "MASTER PLAN" ................................................ 11 B. 1972 GALLATIN CANYON STUDY..................................................... 11 V. POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHICS ................................................................... 13 VI. INFRASTRUCTURE................................................................................................ 18 A. UTILITIES............................................................................................ 18 1. Wastewater Treatment.............................................................. 18 2. Water Distribution...................................................................... 19 3. Electric And Telephone Service ................................................ 19 B. TRANSPORTATION ........................................................................... 20 1. Streets And Highways............................................................... 20 2. Air Service................................................................................. 20
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Action–Revised Forest Plan, Custer Gallatin National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Proposed Action–Revised Forest Plan, Custer Gallatin National Forest Forest Service January 2018 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (for example, Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumulative Effects Analysis for Issuance of Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex Outfitter and Guide Permits, April 2005
    Cumulative Effects Analysis for Issuance of Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex Outfitter and Guide Permits, April 2005 The majority of environmental effects associated outfitter and guide use are specific to the activities permitted under each permit. These include such effects as ground disturbance associated with established camps. In addition, there are social issues and indicators that have a role with all users in the wilderness both outfitter publics and non-outfitted publics. These effects are considered and disclosed in individual analyses prepared for each permit. However, some resource values span large geographic areas and can be affected by groups of, or all of the proposed permitted activities. This cumulative effects analysis is prepared to disclose those cumulative effects and is intended to be considered and incorporated into those individual analysis for which they are identified. Proposed Action: The Flathead, Lewis & Clark, Helena, and Lolo National Forests are preparing to re-issue special use permits for outfitting and guiding in the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex (BMWC). The complex consists of the Great Bear, Bob Marshall and Scapegoat Wilderness Areas, for a total of 1.8 million acres in North Central Montana. Background: Outfitter use in the BMWC appears to have begun in about 1919, when Joe Murphy of Ovando packed hunters into the South Fork of the Flathead River area. The number of outfitters operating in the BMWC increased over time until the number was capped in 1981 at 45. Most of these operations have been in existence for 25-65 years, some longer. Most of these permits are due to expire on April 30, 2005.
    [Show full text]