Pennsylvanian and Associated Rocks in Wyomin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pennsylvanian and Associated Rocks in Wyomin Pennsylvanian and Associated Rocks in Wyomin By WILLIAM W. MALLORY SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 5S4-G A regional study of the extent, thickness, lit ho logy, and stratigraphic relations of the Tensleep, Ams- den, Casper, and Fountain Formations, with em­ phasis on origin,paleogeography, and paleotectonic implications UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1967 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract. _________________________________________ Gl Casper Formation._________________________________ G17 Introduction. ______________________________________ 1 Fountain Formation._______________________________ 18 Location and extent of the area. _ _________________ 1 Minnelusa and Hartville Formations __________________ 18 Scope and objectives. ___________________________ 1 Morgan Formation and Weber Sandstone-_____________ 20 Previous work and acknowledgments. ____________ 2 Rocks of Morrow age in the Minnelusa, Hartville, Casper, Methods of study. _____________________________ 2 and Morgan Formations..___________-_-_--______-_ 20 Tectonic setting of the Middle Rocky Mountain region in Tensleep Sandstone._____-____________------------__ 21 Pennsylvanian time.. _ ____________________________ 3 Lithology and thickness.___-_-____-------_______ 21 Definition of the Pennsylvanian System in Wyoming. ___ 4 Extent and thickness of the Pennsylvanian System. _____ 5 Age.__---__________------------------------_-_ 21 Lower boundary of the Pennsylvanian System. _________ Quadrant Quartzite.______________-_----_---_-______ 22 Character of the disconformity- __________________ Lithology and thickness-________________________ 22 Time span of the hiatus in Wyoming. _____________ Age____._____________-_________------_-------- 22 Paleogeomorphology of the disconformity in north­ Rocks of Des Moines, Missouri, and Virgil age_________ 23 western Wyoming. ___________________________ Des Moines rocks__________________.-__--_______ 23 Interregional significance of the disconformity on Missouri rocks__________-_--____-_---__--------_ 23 the craton. __________________________________ Virgil rocks.________-____________----_--------- 24 Amsden Formation. _ _______________________________ Upper Boundary of the Pennsylvanian System.________ 25 Lithologic units. _______________________________ 8 Source of sand_-__-_________--__-___-_-_--_--------- 25 10 Nomenclature and the Amsden problem. 10 Tabulation of control data-_-______-___--_----------- 27 Darwin Sandstone Member. ___ ________ 11 Surface-______________-___-______---_---------- 27 Horseshoe Shale Member. ____________ 12 Subsurface..-_____-_-----------------------_--- 28 Ranchester Limestone Memb er _ _____ 14 References cited.___________________________________ 30 ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates are in pocJietJ PLATE 1. Correlation diagrams (stratigraphic sections) of Pennsylvanian and Mississippian rocks in the Middle Rocky Mountain region, Wyoming, showing relation of lithologic units and approximate time boundaries. 2. Maps showing extent, thickness, and lithology of members of the Amsden Formation of Mississippian and Pennsyl­ vanian age, and correlative formations in the Middle Rocky Mountain region. 3. Maps showing extent, thickness, and lithology of Tensleep Sandstone (except that part of Permian age) and total thickness of the Amsden, Tensleep, and correlative formations in the Middle Rocky Mountain region. Page FIGURE 1. Index map showing location of report area._______________________-__------_--------------------------- G2 2. Index map showing position of Ancestral Rocky Mountains relative to existing ranges and basins in Wyoming-_ 3. Correlation chart of Pennsylvanian and closely related strata in Wyoming.____________-_------------------ 4. Index map of Wyoming showing areal extent of Pennsylvanian formations and exposed Precambrian basement rock in existing mountain ranges__________________________-_--__---------------------------------- 5. Photograph showing erosional disconformity between Amsden Formation and Madison Limestone in Wind River Canyon, south of Thermopolis, Wyo.______________-_____--_--------------------------------- 6. Type and reference sections of Amsden Formation.______________________--_---------------------------- 9 7. Photographs showing crossbedding in Darwin Sandstone Member, Tensleep Canyon.__________-_------------ 12 8. View of north wall of Tensleep Canyon near trout-rearing station showing the top of the Madison Limestone, the three members of the Amsden Formation, and the lower part of the Tensleep Sandstone.___________ 9. Paleogeologic map showing areal geology of Pathfinder uplift at end of Atoka time and thickness and lithology of Ranchester Limestone Member of Amsden Formation in area surrounding the uplift____-------------- 10. Photograph of the red marker on east fork of Wagonhound Creek, west of Arlington, Carbon County, Wyo____ 11. Geologic section showing generalized correlation of Pennsylvanian and Permian rocks across southern part of Laramie basin and Laramie Mountains, Wyo. and Colo.________--_-----_--- -__-_-------------_-- in IV CONTENTS Page FIGUBE 12. Photograph of Tensleep Sandstone in Sinks Canyon of Middle Popo Agie River__._________________________ G21 13. Photograph showing giant crossbedding in the Tensleep Sandstone, Bull Lake Canyon, Wind River Range.___ 22 14. Map showing western limits of Missouri and Virgil rocks in central Wyoming._____________________________ 24 15. Formations which overlie Pennsylvanian strata in Wyoming.____________________________________________ 25 16. Map showing restored regional drainage patterns for Carboniferous time in northern United States and southern Canada.___-_-___________________________--______-__-__--___----_-_---_----------------------_- 26 SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY PENNSYLVANIAN AND ASSOCIATED ROCKS IN WYOMING By WILLIAM W. MALLORY ABSTRACT southern part of the Pathfinder uplift were deposited in the Laramie basin area as the Fountain Formation. The Pennsylvania!! System in the Middle Rocky Mountains of In Des Moines time the Tensleep Sandstone was deposited on a Wyoming is represented principally by the Amsden and Ten- broad marine shelf over most of the area, while limestone, sand­ sleep Formations. These grade eastward into the Minnelusa, stone, and shale of the Hartville and Minnelusa Formations were Hartville, Casper, and Fountain Formations, and southward in­ deposited in eastern Wyoming. Arkose was deposited in dimin­ to the Weber and Morgan Formations. The Amsden Formation ishing quantities in the Laramie basin area during Atoka, Des has three members: the Darwin Sandstone at the base, the Horse­ Moines, Missouri, and Virgil times. In Missouri and Virgil time, shoe Shale (new name) in the middle, and the Ranchester Lime­ western Wyoming was emergent, and some sand derived from stone (new name) at the top. The Darwin is of Chester (Mis­ the Des Moines Tensleep there was removed and redeposited in sissippian) age; the Horseshoe is of Chester and Morrow ages; central Wyoming. and the Ranchester is of Morrow age at the base but is mostly The Pathfinder uplift had its greatest extent and elevation in of Atoka age. Atoka time and was progressively submerged later in the The Tensleep Sandstone (and its equivalent, the Quadrant Pennsylvanian. It ceased to exist in late Virgil or Early Permian Quartzite, in the Yellowstone Park area) is entirely of Des Moiues age in the Bighorn and Wind River Basins. In central time. Wyoming, however, the Tensleep contains beds of Missouri, Vir­ INTRODUCTION gil, and Early Permian ages. The Minnelusa and Hartville For­ mations in the eastern part of the State contain interbedded LOCATION AND EXTENT OF THE AREA sandstone, shale, and carbonate rock ranging in age from Morrow to Early Permian. The Casper is composed of sandstone and car­ The report area is the State of Wyoming except six bonate rock and grades southward into red arkosic conglomerate counties on the east side of the State (Campbell, Crook, of the Fountain Formation in the Laramie basin and adjacent Weston, Niobrara, Goshen, and most of Laramie areas. The Casper and Fountain Formations also range in age County) and the thrust belt along the west side (much from Morrow to Early Permian, but the older strata are missing in a wide area in central Wyoming where the Pathfinder uplift, of Lincoln County and parts of adjacent counties) (fig. the northernmost element of the Ancestral Rocky Mountains, 1). The area spans 4° of latitude (41°-4r5° N.) and dominated the paleogeographic scene. 6° of longitude (105°-111° W.) and encompasses about In Late Mississippian time the Mississippian Madison Lime­ 70,000 square miles. Physiographically it is dominated stone was exposed throughout the area except in the Laramie by the Middle Eocky Mountains. basin and adjacent mountains, where the Precambrian basement rocks were exposed. A karst surface formed in many areas on SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES the Madison in Late Mississippian time. In late Chester and per­ haps early Morrow time, marine waters spread eastward across The stratigraphy of the Pennsylvanian System in the Wyoming from the geosyncline in southern Idaho and invaded Middle Eocky Mountain region is generally simple, but the major valleys first and later covered nearly all the Madison understanding
Recommended publications
  • Geology of the Wairarapa Area
    GEOLOGY OF THE WAIRARAPA AREA J. M. LEE J.G.BEGG (COMPILERS) New International NewZOaland Age International New Zealand 248 (Ma) .............. 8~:~~~~~~~~ 16 il~ M.- L. Pleistocene !~ Castlecliffian We £§ Sellnuntian .~ Ozhulflanl Makarewan YOm 1.8 100 Wuehlaplngien i ~ Gelaslan Cl Nukumaruan Wn ~ ;g '"~ l!! ~~ Mangapanlan Ql -' TatarianiMidian Ql Piacenzlan ~ ~;: ~ u Wai i ian 200 Ian w 3.6 ,g~ J: Kazanlan a.~ Zanetaan Opoitian Wo c:: 300 '"E Braxtonisn .!!! .~ YAb 256 5.3 E Kunaurian Messinian Kapitean Tk Ql ~ Mangapirian YAm 400 a. Arlinskian :;; ~ l!!'" 500 Sakmarian ~ Tortonisn ,!!! Tongaporutuan Tt w'" pre-Telfordian Ypt ~ Asselian 600 '" 290 11.2 ~ 700 'lii Serravallian Waiauan 5w Ql ." i'l () c:: ~ 600 J!l - fl~ '§ ~ 0'" 0 0 ~~ !II Lillburnian 51 N 900 Langhian 0 ~ Clifdenian 5e 16.4 ca '1000 1 323 !II Z'E e'" W~ A1tonian PI oS! ~ Burdigalian i '2 F () 0- w'" '" Dtaian Po ~ OS Waitakian Lw U 23.8 UI nlan ~S § "t: ." Duntroonian Ld '" Chattian ~ W'" 28.5 P .Sll~ -''" Whalngaroan Lwh O~ Rupelian 33.7 Late Priabonian ." AC 37.0 n n 0 I ~~ ~ Bortonian Ab g; Lutetisn Paranaen Do W Heretauncan Oh 49.0 354 ~ Mangaorapan Om i Ypreslan .;;: w WalD8wsn Ow ~ JU 54.8 ~ Thanetlan § 370 t-- §~ 0'" ~ Selandian laurien Dt ." 61.0 ;g JM ~"t: c:::::;; a.os'"w Danian 391 () os t-- 65.0 '2 Maastrichtian 0 - Emslsn Jzl 0 a; -m Haumurian Mh :::;; N 0 t-- Campanian ~ Santonian 0 Pragian Jpr ~ Piripauan Mp W w'" -' t-- Coniacian 1ij Teratan Rt ...J Lochovlan Jlo Turonian Mannaotanean Rm <C !II j Arowhanan Ra 417 0- Cenomanian '" Ngaterian Cn Prldoli
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Overview of the Greater Fritillary Genus Speyeria Scudder
    INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0090 Taxonomic overview of the greater fritillary genus Speyeria Scudder and the atlantis hesperis species complexes, with species accounts, type images, and relevant literature (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) James C. Dunford McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida PO Box 112710, Gainesville, FL 326112710, USA Date of Issue: September 26, 2009 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL James C. Dunford Taxonomic overview of the greater fritillary genus Speyeria Scudder and the atlantis hesperis species complexes, with species accounts, type images, and relevant literature (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Insecta Mundi 0090: 174 Published in 2009 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc. P. O. Box 141874 Gainesville, FL 326141874 U. S. A. http://www.centerforsystematicentomology.org/ Insecta Mundi is a journal primarily devoted to insect systematics, but articles can be published on any nonmarine arthropod taxon. Manuscripts considered for publication include, but are not limited to, systematic or taxonomic studies, revisions, nomenclatural changes, faunal studies, book reviews, phylo genetic analyses, biological or behavioral studies, etc. Insecta Mundi is widely distributed, and refer- enced or abstracted by several sources including the Zoological Record, CAB Abstracts, etc. As of 2007, Insecta Mundi is published irregularly throughout the year, not as quarterly issues. As manuscripts are completed they are published and given an individual number. Manuscripts must be peer reviewed prior to submission, after which they are again reviewed by the editorial board to insure quality. One author of each submitted manuscript must be a current member of the Center for System- atic Entomology.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Salinity in the Greater Green River Basin, Wyoming
    Interpreting the past, providing for the future Groundwater Salinity in the Greater Green River Basin, Wyoming Karl G. Taboga, James E. Stafford, James R. Rodgers, Seth J. Wittke, and Charles P. Samra Open File Report 2020-10 December 2020 Wyoming State Geological Survey Erin A. Campbell, Director and State Geologist Groundwater Salinity in the Greater Green River Basin, Wyoming Karl G. Taboga, James E. Stafford, James R. Rodgers, Seth J. Wittke, and Charles P. Samra Layout by Christina D. George Open File Report 2020-10 Wyoming State Geological Survey Laramie, Wyoming: 2020 This Wyoming State Geological Survey (WSGS) Open File Report is preliminary and may require additional compilation and analysis. Additional data and review may be provided in subsequent years. For more information about the WSGS, or to download a copy of this Open File Report, visit www.wsgs.wyo. gov. The WSGS welcomes any comments and suggestions on this research. Please contact the WSGS at 307-766-2286, or email [email protected]. Citation: Taboga, K.G., Stafford, J.E., Rodgers, J.R., Wittke, S.J. and Samra, C.P., 2020, Groundwater salinity in the Greater Green River Basin, Wyoming: Wyoming State Geological Survey Open File Report 2020-10, 31 p. ii Table of Contents Introduction . 1 Background ..................................................................................2 Water Quality Standards, Groundwater Classification, and TDS Levels ..................................2 Current Beneficial Uses of Saline Groundwater in Wyoming. .2 Industrial Applications for
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHEAST CORRIDOR New York - Washington, DC
    NORTHEAST CORRIDOR New York - Washington, DC September 5, 2017 NEW YORK and WASHINGTON, DC NEW YORK - NEWARK - TRENTON PHILADELPHIA - WILMINGTON BALTIMORE - WASHINGTON, DC and intermediate stations Acela Express,® Reserved Northeast RegionalSM and Keystone Service® THIS TIMETABLE SHOWS ALL AMTRAK SERVICE FROM BOSTON OR SPRINGFIELD TO POINTS NEW YORK THROUGH WASHINGTON, DC. Also see Timetable Form W04 for complete Boston/Springfield to Washington, DC schedules, and Timetable Form W06 for service to Virginia locations. FALL HOLIDAYS Special Thanksgiving timetables for the period, November 20 through 27, 2017, will appear on Amtrak.com shortly and temporarily supersede these schedules. 1-800-USA-RAIL Amtrak.com Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, 60 Massachusetts Ave. N.E., Washington, DC 20002. NRPC Form W2–Internet only–9/5/17. Schedules subject to change without notice. Depart Depart Depart Depart Depart Arrive Depart Depart Depart Depart Depart Arrive Train Name/Number Frequency New York Newark Newark Intl. Air. Metropark Trenton Philadelphia Philadelphia Wilmington Baltimore BWI New Carrollton Washington Northeast Regional 67 Mo-Fr 3 25A 3 45A —— 4 00A 4 25A 4 52A 5 00A 5 22A 6 10A 6 25A 6 40A 7 00A Northeast Regional 151 Mo-Fr 4 40A R4 57A —— 5 12A 5 35A 6 04A 6 07A 6 28A 7 27A 7 40A D7 59A 8 14A Northeast Regional 111 Mo-Fr 5 30A R5 46A —— 6 00A 6 26A 6 53A 6 55A 7 15A 8 00A 8 15A D8 29A 8 50A Acela Express 2103 Mo-Fr
    [Show full text]
  • 5-Year Review Short Form Summary
    5-Year Review Short Form Summary Species Reviewed: Preble’s meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius preblei) FR Notice Announcing Initiation of This Review: March 31, 2004. 90-Day Finding for a Petition to Delist the Preble’s Meadow Jumping Mouse in Colorado and Wyoming and Initiation of a 5-Year Review (69 FR 16944-16946). Lead Region/Field Office: Region 6, Seth Willey, Recovery Coordinator, 303-236-4257. Colorado Field Office, Susan Linner, Field Supervisor, 303-236-4773. Name of Reviewer: Peter Plage, Colorado Field Office, 303-236-4750. Cooperating Field Office: Wyoming Field Office, Brian Kelly, Field Supervisor, 307-772-2374. Current Classification: Threatened rangewide. Current Recovery Priority Number: 9c. This recovery priority number is indicative of a subspecies facing a moderate degree of threat, a high recovery potential, and whose recovery may be in conflict with construction or other development projects or other forms of economic activity. Methodology used to complete the review: The 5-year review for the Preble’s meadow jumping mouse (Preble’s) was accomplished through the petition and rulemaking process. On December 23, 2003, we received two nearly identical petitions from the State of Wyoming’s Office of the Governor and from Coloradans for Water Conservation and Development, seeking to remove the Preble’s from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. Both petitions were similar and maintained that the Preble’s should be delisted based on the taxonomic revision, and based on new distribution, abundance, and trends data that suggested the Preble’s was no longer threatened. On March 31, 2004, we published a notice announcing a 90-day finding that the petitions presented substantial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted and initiated a 5-year review (69 FR 16944-16946).
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvanian and Early Permian Paleogeography of the Uinta-Piceance Basin Region, Northwestern Colorado and Northeastern Utah
    Pennsylvanian and Early Permian Paleogeography of the Uinta-Piceance Basin Region, Northwestern Colorado and Northeastern Utah U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1 787-CC AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with the last offerings, are given in the current-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated monthly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Sales, Box 25286, Denver, CO 80225. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books of the U.S. Geological Survey are available over the niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey offices, all of of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Documents. copies of periodicals (Earthquakes & Volcanoes, Preliminary De­ termination of Epicenters), and some miscellaneous reports, includ­ ANCHORAGE, Alaska-4230 University Dr., Rm.
    [Show full text]
  • Denudation History and Internal Structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, Based on Apatite-Fission-Track Thermoc
    NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY & MINERAL RESOURCES, BULLETIN 160, 2004 41 Denudation history and internal structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, based on apatite­fission­track thermochronology 1 2 1Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801Shari A. Kelley and Charles E. Chapin 2New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Abstract An apatite fission­track (AFT) partial annealing zone (PAZ) that developed during Late Cretaceous time provides a structural datum for addressing questions concerning the timing and magnitude of denudation, as well as the structural style of Laramide deformation, in the Front Range and Wet Mountains of Colorado. AFT cooling ages are also used to estimate the magnitude and sense of dis­ placement across faults and to differentiate between exhumation and fault­generated topography. AFT ages at low elevationX along the eastern margin of the southern Front Range between Golden and Colorado Springs are from 100 to 270 Ma, and the mean track lengths are short (10–12.5 µm). Old AFT ages (> 100 Ma) are also found along the western margin of the Front Range along the Elkhorn thrust fault. In contrast AFT ages of 45–75 Ma and relatively long mean track lengths (12.5–14 µm) are common in the interior of the range. The AFT ages generally decrease across northwest­trending faults toward the center of the range. The base of a fossil PAZ, which separates AFT cooling ages of 45– 70 Ma at low elevations from AFT ages > 100 Ma at higher elevations, is exposed on the south side of Pikes Peak, on Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is a Digital Document from the Collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library
    This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library. For additional information about this document and the document conversion process, please contact WRDS at [email protected] and include the phrase “Digital Documents” in your subject heading. To view other documents please visit the WRDS Library online at: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu Mailing Address: Water Resources Data System University of Wyoming, Dept 3943 1000 E University Avenue Laramie, WY 82071 Physical Address: Wyoming Hall, Room 249 University of Wyoming Laramie, WY 82071 Phone: (307) 766-6651 Fax: (307) 766-3785 Funding for WRDS and the creation of this electronic document was provided by the Wyoming Water Development Commission (http://wwdc.state.wy.us) VOLUME 11-A OCCURRENCE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUND WATER IN THE BIGHORN BASIN, WYOMING Robert Libra, Dale Doremus , Craig Goodwin Project Manager Craig Eisen Water Resources Research Institute University of Wyoming Report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Contract Number G 008269-791 Project Officer Paul Osborne June, 1981 INTRODUCTION This report is the second of a series of hydrogeologic basin reports that define the occurrence and chemical quality of ground water within Wyoming. Information presented in this report has been obtained from several sources including available U.S. Geological Survey publications, the Wyoming State Engineer's Office, the Wyoming Geological Survey, and the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. The purpose of this report is to provide background information for implementation of the Underground Injection Control Program (UIC). The UIC program, authorized by the Safe Drinking Water Act (P.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping
    Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping Summary Yellowstone National Park This document summarizes the results of a geologic resource evaluation scoping session that was held at Yellowstone National Park on May 16–17, 2005. The NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD) organized this scoping session in order to view and discuss the park’s geologic resources, address the status of geologic maps and digitizing, and assess resource management issues and needs. In addition to GRD staff, participants included park staff and cooperators from the U.S. Geological Survey and Colorado State University (table 1). Table 1. Participants of Yellowstone’s GRE Scoping Session Name Affiliation Phone E-Mail Bob Volcanologist, USGS–Menlo Park 650-329-5201 [email protected] Christiansen Geologist/GRE Program GIS Lead, NPS Tim Connors 303-969-2093 [email protected] Geologic Resources Division Data Stewardship Coordinator, Greater Rob Daley 406-994-4124 [email protected] Yellowstone Network Supervisory Geologist, Yellowstone Hank Heasler 307-344-2441 [email protected] National Park Geologist, NPS Geologic Resources Bruce Heise 303-969-2017 [email protected] Division Cheryl Geologist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-2208 [email protected] Jaworowski Katie Geologist/Senior Research Associate, 970-586-7243 [email protected] KellerLynn Colorado State University Branch Chief, NPS Geologic Resources Carol McCoy 303-969-2096 [email protected] Division Ken Pierce Surficial Geologist, USGS–Bozeman 406-994-5085 [email protected] Supervisory GIS Specialist, Yellowstone Anne Rodman 307-344-7381 [email protected] National Park Shannon GIS Specialist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-7381 [email protected] Savage Monday, May 16, involved a welcome to Yellowstone National Park and an introduction to the Geologic Resource Evaluation (GRE) Program, including status of reports and digital maps.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • 001-012 Primeras Páginas
    PUBLICACIONES DEL INSTITUTO GEOLÓGICO Y MINERO DE ESPAÑA Serie: CUADERNOS DEL MUSEO GEOMINERO. Nº 9 ADVANCES IN TRILOBITE RESEARCH ADVANCES IN TRILOBITE RESEARCH IN ADVANCES ADVANCES IN TRILOBITE RESEARCH IN ADVANCES planeta tierra Editors: I. Rábano, R. Gozalo and Ciencias de la Tierra para la Sociedad D. García-Bellido 9 788478 407590 MINISTERIO MINISTERIO DE CIENCIA DE CIENCIA E INNOVACIÓN E INNOVACIÓN ADVANCES IN TRILOBITE RESEARCH Editors: I. Rábano, R. Gozalo and D. García-Bellido Instituto Geológico y Minero de España Madrid, 2008 Serie: CUADERNOS DEL MUSEO GEOMINERO, Nº 9 INTERNATIONAL TRILOBITE CONFERENCE (4. 2008. Toledo) Advances in trilobite research: Fourth International Trilobite Conference, Toledo, June,16-24, 2008 / I. Rábano, R. Gozalo and D. García-Bellido, eds.- Madrid: Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, 2008. 448 pgs; ils; 24 cm .- (Cuadernos del Museo Geominero; 9) ISBN 978-84-7840-759-0 1. Fauna trilobites. 2. Congreso. I. Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, ed. II. Rábano,I., ed. III Gozalo, R., ed. IV. García-Bellido, D., ed. 562 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without permission in writing from the publisher. References to this volume: It is suggested that either of the following alternatives should be used for future bibliographic references to the whole or part of this volume: Rábano, I., Gozalo, R. and García-Bellido, D. (eds.) 2008. Advances in trilobite research. Cuadernos del Museo Geominero, 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet: Amtrak in Pennsylvania
    Fact sheet: Amtrak in Pennsylvania Passengers in Pennsylvania, 2013-2019: Pennsylvanians near a station boarding & detraining (in thousands) Within 25 miles: 8,814,659 (69%) 6,664.7 Within 50 miles: 11,130,870 (88%) 6,427.6 6,514.9 6,189.4 6,330.0 5,957.7 6,082.9 Amtrak service in the state Acela - Multiple trains daily Springfield-New Haven - Keystone - Multiple trains daily Silver Star - Daily service Cardinal - 3 trains/wk Silver Meteor - Daily service Capitol Limited - Daily service Lake Shore Limited - Daily service VA Service/Roanoke - Daily service VA Service/Newport News - Multiple trains daily Palmetto - Daily service Regional - Multiple trains daily 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 VA Service/Norfolk - Daily service VA Service/Richmond - Daily service Also, 5,228,380 riders passed through Pennsylvania in 2019 - Crescent - Daily service boarding and detraining outside the state. Pennsylvanian - Daily service Carolinian - Daily service Quick recap, 2019 (arrivals and departures) 24 Amtrak stations Coach/ First/ Business Sleeper Total 2017 2018 2019 Passengers 6,575,894 88,795 6,664,689 Altoona 21,447 19,378 18,689 Ardmore 65,882 63,493 68,629 Average trip 111 miles 247 miles 113 miles Coatesville 17,770 17,278 14,915 Connellsville 4,762 4,407 4,864 Top city pairs by ridership, 2019 Cornwells Hgts 3,073 3,673 3,103 Downingtown 86,806 81,154 81,342 1. Philadelphia - New York, NY 91 mi Elizabethtown 100,627 99,576 100,519 2. Philadelphia - Washington, DC 135 mi Erie 16,766 15,072 15,573 3.
    [Show full text]