Regional Stormwater Manual

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regional Stormwater Manual Spokane Regional Stormwater Manual April 2008 SPOKANE REGIONAL STORMWATER MANUAL APRIL 2008 Prepared by: Spokane County 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 477-3600 City of Spokane 808 W. Spokane Falls Blvd. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 625-6700 City of Spokane Valley 11707 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, Washington 99206 (509) 921-1000 A special thanks to the members of the committee who dedicated their time and energy in the development of the manual: Gloria Mantz, City of Spokane Valley Kris Becker, City of Spokane Gary Nelson, City of Spokane Mike Yake, City of Spokane Colleen Little, Spokane County Matt Zarecor, Spokane County Spokane County, City of Spokane, City of Spokane Valley Spokane Regional Stormwater Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page No. Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i List of Figures..............................................................................................................................viii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. ix Glossary .......................................................................................................................................... x References................................................................................................................................... xxv Chapter 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Objective And Purpose ................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Vision Statement........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Using The Stormwater Manual..................................................................................... 1-1 1.3.1 Technical Information.......................................................................................... 1-2 1.3.2 Policy Information ............................................................................................... 1-3 1.4 Relevant Programs and Concepts ................................................................................. 1-3 1.4.1 Underground Injection Control Program Compliance......................................... 1-4 1.4.2 Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Sole-Source Aquifer ..................................... 1-4 1.4.3 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Compliance .......................... 1-5 1.4.4 Pollutant Generating Impervious Surface............................................................ 1-6 1.5 General Requirements................................................................................................... 1-6 1.6 Standard of Care ........................................................................................................... 1-7 1.7 Severability ................................................................................................................... 1-8 Chapter 2. Basic Requirements....................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Regulatory Threshold...........................................................................................2-1 2.1.2 New Development ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.3 Redevelopment .................................................................................................... 2-2 2.1.4 Exemptions .......................................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.5 Generally Exempt ................................................................................................ 2-4 2.1.6 Design Deviations................................................................................................ 2-5 2.2 Basic Requirements ...................................................................................................... 2-6 2.2.1 Basic Requirement No. 1 – Drainage Submittal.................................................. 2-6 2.2.2 Basic Requirement No. 2 – Geotechnical Site Characterization ......................... 2-9 2.2.3 Basic Requirement No. 3 – Water Quality Treatment....................................... 2-10 April 2008 Table of Contents i SPOKANE REGIONAL STORMWATER MANUAL 2.2.4 Basic Requirement No. 4 – Flow Control.......................................................... 2-14 2.2.5 Basic Requirement No. 5 – Natural And Constructed Conveyance Systems.... 2-16 2.2.6 Basic Requirement No. 6 – Erosion And Sediment Control ............................. 2-18 2.2.7 Basic Requirement No. 7 – Source Control....................................................... 2-19 2.2.8 Basic Requirement No. 8 – Operation And Maintenance.................................. 2-20 Chapter 3. Drainage Submittal.....................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Applicability ................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2.1 Required............................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.2 Generally Required.............................................................................................. 3-1 3.2.3 Generally Exempt ................................................................................................ 3-2 3.2.4 Exempt ................................................................................................................. 3-3 3.3 Concept Drainage Report.............................................................................................. 3-4 3.3.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................... 3-4 3.3.2 Applicability ........................................................................................................ 3-4 3.3.3 Exemptions .......................................................................................................... 3-5 3.3.4 Scope.................................................................................................................... 3-5 3.4 Drainage Report............................................................................................................ 3-7 3.4.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................... 3-7 3.4.2 Narrative .............................................................................................................. 3-7 3.4.3 Figures.................................................................................................................. 3-9 3.4.4 Calculations........................................................................................................ 3-10 3.4.5 Down-Gradient Analysis................................................................................... 3-11 3.5 Road and Drainage Plans............................................................................................ 3-12 3.5.1 Introduction........................................................................................................ 3-12 3.5.2 Minimum Plan Elements.................................................................................... 3-13 3.5.3 Revisions After Plan Acceptance....................................................................... 3-14 3.6 Other Submittal Elements........................................................................................... 3-14 Appendix 3A – Example Tables for Drainage Report........................................................... 3-17 Appendix 3B – Standard Notes for Road and Drainage Plans .............................................. 3-19 Appendix 3C – Lot Plan Criteria and Example ..................................................................... 3-21 Chapter 4. Geotechnical Site Characterization ............................................................................4-1 4.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Applicability ................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.3 Geotechnical Site Characterization Report................................................................... 4-2 4.3.1 Field and Laboratory Testing............................................................................... 4-4 4.3.2 Sub-Level Structure Feasibility ........................................................................... 4-6 Appendix 4A – Spokane 200 Method...................................................................................... 4-9 Appendix 4B – Full-Scale Drywell Test Method .................................................................. 4-13 April 2008 Table of Contents ii SPOKANE REGIONAL STORMWATER MANUAL Appendix 4C – Test Pit Method ...........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Characterization of Ecoregions of Idaho
    1 0 . C o l u m b i a P l a t e a u 1 3 . C e n t r a l B a s i n a n d R a n g e Ecoregion 10 is an arid grassland and sagebrush steppe that is surrounded by moister, predominantly forested, mountainous ecoregions. It is Ecoregion 13 is internally-drained and composed of north-trending, fault-block ranges and intervening, drier basins. It is vast and includes parts underlain by thick basalt. In the east, where precipitation is greater, deep loess soils have been extensively cultivated for wheat. of Nevada, Utah, California, and Idaho. In Idaho, sagebrush grassland, saltbush–greasewood, mountain brush, and woodland occur; forests are absent unlike in the cooler, wetter, more rugged Ecoregion 19. Grazing is widespread. Cropland is less common than in Ecoregions 12 and 80. Ecoregions of Idaho The unforested hills and plateaus of the Dissected Loess Uplands ecoregion are cut by the canyons of Ecoregion 10l and are disjunct. 10f Pure grasslands dominate lower elevations. Mountain brush grows on higher, moister sites. Grazing and farming have eliminated The arid Shadscale-Dominated Saline Basins ecoregion is nearly flat, internally-drained, and has light-colored alkaline soils that are Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and America into 15 ecological regions. Level II divides the continent into 52 regions Literature Cited: much of the original plant cover. Nevertheless, Ecoregion 10f is not as suited to farming as Ecoregions 10h and 10j because it has thinner soils.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer Atlas Preface Contents
    The Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer Atlas Preface Contents The Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer Atlas presents a compre- Shaded Relief Map ...........................................Front Cover hensive summary of the region’s most precious groundwater resource and Using The is a basic reference of the geographic, geologic and hydrologic characteris- Preface and Contents........................... Inside Front Cover tics of this aquifer. Introduction ........................................................................ 1 Atlas The Atlas is designed in a narrative format supported by graphs, maps Aquifer from Space............................................................. 2 and images. It is intended for broad community use in education, plan- ning, and general technical information. The preparation and publica- Geography........................................................................... 3 tion of the atlas were partially funded by a United States Environmental Aquifer History................................................................... 4 Protection Agency aquifer wellhead protection grant. Climate and Population .................................................... 5 The information was collected and obtained from a variety of sources, If your interest in the Aquifer is including: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Idaho Depart- Geology................................................................................ 6 general, the authors suggest you page ment of Environmental Quality, Panhandle
    [Show full text]
  • SR 27: SR 278 Jct (Rockford) to 32Nd Ave Int. (Spokane Valley) Corridor
    Corridor Sketch Summary Printed at: 3:20 PM 3/19/2018 WSDOT's Corridor Sketch Initiative is a collaborative planning process with agency partners to identify performance gaps and select high-level strategies to address them on the 304 corridors statewide. This Corridor Sketch Summary acts as an executive summary for one corridor. Please review the User Guide for Corridor Sketch Summaries prior to using information on this corridor: SR 27: SR 278 Jct (Rockford) to 32nd Ave Int. (Spokane Valley) This 14-mile long east-west corridor in Spokane County is located in eastern Washington near the Washington/Idaho border. The corridor runs between the State Route 278 junction in the town of Rockford and the 32nd Avenue intersection in the city of Spokane Valley. The corridor passes through the small communities of Mica and Freeman. The corridor’s character is predominantly rural. The area south of Spokane Valley has low-density residential, commercial, and undeveloped land uses. In addition to single-family residences within Mica and Rockford, land uses are comprised of heavy industry, manufacturing, and wholesale retail. Other land uses throughout the corridor include agriculture and private- commercial forest. Freeman High School and the Freeman District Office are located in Freeman mid-corridor. One airport, Felts Field, is located to the northwest of the corridor. The entire corridor parallels the Union Pacific Railroad, crossing it at two locations north of Mica and in Rockford. Topography throughout the corridor is rolling. Current Function SR 27 is a state highway serving Whitman and Spokane counties, traveling through the cities of Pullman, Palouse, Tekoa, and Spokane Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Guide2021
    Senator Mike Padden 2021 Government Guide 4th LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT This guide to government provides information on how to contact federal, state and local government offices and services. 2021 Dear friends and neighbors, As your state senator in Olympia, I am pleased to offer this 2021 edition of our government guide. This guide provides contact information for elected representatives and important local agencies, to assist you in your dealings with local, state and federal governments. I am honored to serve in the Legislature and be your voice at the state Capitol. My goal is to bring the values of the 4th Legislative District Senator to the state Capitol. Our district is blessed with innovative people, resilient small businesses Mike Padden and vibrant, close-knit communities where we 4th Legislative District care about one another. 106 Newhouse Building In Olympia, I work to keep state spending PO Box 40404 under control, reduce the size of our state Olympia, WA 98504-0404 bureaucracy, strengthen our economy, support Olympia Office: (360) 786-7606 our charitable organizations and promote E-mail: [email protected] traditional family values. I recognize that every Toll-free Legislative Hotline tax dollar we spend in Olympia is a dollar that You may leave a message for has come from the hardworking people of this me on the toll-free Legislative state. Hotline. Please call: Together we can build a better state for 1-800-562-6000 our children and for future generations. You can influence the decisions that will shape our future by making your opinions known to the people who represent you at all levels of government.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan
    Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2017-2037 ADOPTED: DECEMBER 2016 BY ORDINANCE NO. 16-018; AMENDED BY ORDINANCE: 18-014; 19-004; 20-008 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK. Acknowledgments CITY COUNCIL Rod Higgins, Mayor Arne Woodard, Deputy Mayor Pam Haley Ed Pace Caleb Collier Sam Wood Mike Munch PLANNING COMMISSION Kevin Anderson Heather Graham James Johnson Tim Kelley Mike Phillips Suzanne Stathos Michelle Rasmussen CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STAFF Mark Calhoun, City Manager John Hohman, Community Development Director Mike Basinger, Senior Planner Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Chaz Bates, Economic Development Specialist Gloria Mantz, Development Engineer Sean Messner, Senior Traffic Engineer CONSULTANT TEAM Van Ness Feldman Community Attributes Inc. Fehr and Peers AECOM Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction & Vision 1-7 Chapter 2: Goals, Policies & Strategies 2-19 Chapter 3: Economic Development 3-37 Chapter 4: Land Use 4-55 Chapter 5: Transportation 5-69 Chapter 6: Housing 6-95 Chapter 7: Capital Facilities & Public Services 7-111 Chapter 8: Public & Private Utilities 8-133 Chapter 9: Parks, Recreation, & Open Space 9-143 Chapter 10: Natural Resources 10-151 Appendix A: SEPA Analysis Appendix B: 11” x 17” Maps Appendix C: 20-year Transportation Improvement Plan Table of Maps Figure 1: Spokane Valley and the Greater-Spokane Region 1-8 Figure 12: Retail Land Use Concentrations & Trade Areas 3-49 Figure 14: Community Assets and Tourism Opportunities 3-51 Figure 16: Future Land Use Map 4-62 Figure 19: Employment Density vs. Housing Density
    [Show full text]
  • OFR 2004-3, Geologic Map of the Spokane Northwest 7.5-Minute
    WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES OPEN FILE REPORT 2004-3 Division of Geology and Earth Resources Ron Teissere - State Geologist 117°30¢ 117°22¢30² 27¢30²B R.42E. R.43E. 25¢ 47°45¢ 47°45¢ Geologic Map of the Qmw Qmw Spokane Northwest 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Qfs Qfs Spokane County, Washington Qfs Ql „gr by Robert E. Derkey, Michael M. Hamilton, and Dale F. Stradling „wp Ql 2004 „l INTRODUCTION Glacial flood deposits, predominantly gravel „wp Qfg (Pleistocene)—Thick-bedded to massive mixture of boulders, Qaf Previous geologic map coverage of the Spokane Northwest 7.5-minute „gr cobbles, pebbles, granules, and sand; contains beds and lenses of quadrangle was reconnaissance and lacked sufficient detail to be of service sand and silt; gray, yellowish gray, or light brown; poorly to Qaf to developers and planners in the area. We undertook detailed mapping of moderately sorted; both matrix and clast supported; locally the quadrangle in 1999 and completed it in 2000. Our field mapping and air composed of boulders in a matrix of mostly pebbles and coarse photo interpretation was drawn on a U.S. Geological Survey topographic sand; derived from granitic and metamorphic rocks similar to Qml Qmw map of the quadrangle and then digitized and overlaid on digital those exposed both locally and to the northeast and east in Idaho; NORTHSIDE orthophotos from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources found mainly outside of the principal flood channels, which Qmw (1995 edition). Digital contours furnished by the Spokane County approximate the present courses of the Spokane and Little „l geographic information system (GIS) and the orthophotos were then used as Spokane Rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Flow Model for the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer, Spokane County, Washington, and Bonner and Kootenai Counties, Idaho
    Prepared in cooperation with the IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Ground-Water Flow Model for the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer, Spokane County, Washington, and Bonner and Kootenai Counties, Idaho Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5044 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photograph of Spokane Valley, Washington. The U.S. Geological Survey streamflow gaging station on the Spokane River at Greenacres, Washington, is to the right (upstream) of where Barker Road Bridge crosses the river. (Photograph taken by Paul Hsieh, U.S. Geological Survey, 2005.) Ground-Water Flow Model for the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer, Spokane County, Washington, and Bonner and Kootenai Counties, Idaho By Paul A. Hsieh, Michael E. Barber, Bryce A. Contor, Md. Akram Hossain, Gary S. Johnson, Joseph L. Jones, and Allan H. Wylie Prepared in cooperation with the Idaho Department of Water Resources, Washington State Department of Ecology, University of Idaho, and Washington State University Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5044 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form ! «
    NPS Fomi 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Revised Feb. 1993) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service r National Register of Historic Places Registration Form ! «...,. -V'. r '. '..-.. This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructibhs in-Wow toJ?omp/ete the ' . National Register of Historic Places Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by enTerTTTy (he ——;; information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Spokane Valley Land and Water Company Canal__________ other names/site number Spokane River Canal. Corbin Ditch_______________________ 2. Location street & number Diverts in Falls Park. Fourth Street N/A not for publication city or town Post Falls N/A vicinity state Idaho code ID county Kootenai code 055 zip code 83854 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this _X nomination __request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _X_meets _does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • SECTION 24 – Table of Contents
    SECTION 24 – Table of Contents 24 Spokane Subbasin Assessment – Terrestrial Resources ..........................2 24.1 Focal Habitats: Current Distribution, Limiting Factors, and Condition ..................... 2 24.2 Wildlife of the Spokane Subbasin............................................................................. 14 24.3 Summary of Terrestrial Resource Limiting Factors ................................................. 22 24.4 Interpretation and Synthesis...................................................................................... 25 24-1 24 Spokane Subbasin Assessment – Terrestrial Resources 24.1 Focal Habitats: Current Distribution, Limiting Factors, and Condition Vegetation in the Spokane Subbasin ranges from open grass prairies of the rolling Palouse Hills in the southeast to pine savannas at mid-elevations to higher elevation mixed conifer forests in the north and far southeast. Timber management is a major land use in the Little Spokane River drainage. Agriculture is widespread throughout the Subbasin and is the dominant land use in the Hangman/Latah creek drainage. Urban development dominates the east-central portion of the Subbasin, with the cities of Spokane and Spokane Valley comprising the largest urban center in the IMP. The Idaho communities of Post Falls, Hayden and portions of the city of Coeur d’ Alene also occur within the Subbasin. Figure 21.13 (Section 21) shows the current distribution of wildlife-habitat types in the Spokane Subbasin based on IBIS (2003). Table 24.1 presents the corresponding acreages by habitat type and by Subbasin focal habitat. Five focal habitats were selected for the IMP: wetlands, riparian, steppe and shrub-steppe, upland forest, and cliff/rock outcrops. Four of these habitats are represented by the IBIS data displayed in Figure 21.13 and Table 24.1. Cliff/rock outcrop habitats are not mapped by IBIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2017-2037 ADOPTED: DECEMBER 2016 ORDINANCE NO
    Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2017-2037 ADOPTED: DECEMBER 2016 ORDINANCE NO. 16-018 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK. Acknowledgments CITY COUNCIL Rod Higgins, Mayor Arne Woodard, Deputy Mayor Pam Haley Ed Pace Caleb Collier Sam Wood Mike Munch PLANNING COMMISSION Kevin Anderson Heather Graham James Johnson Tim Kelley Mike Phillips Suzanne Stathos Michelle Rasmussen CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STAFF Mark Calhoun, City Manager John Hohman, Community Development Director Mike Basinger, Senior Planner Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Chaz Bates, Economic Development Specialist Gloria Mantz, Development Engineer Sean Messner, Senior Traffic Engineer CONSULTANT TEAM Van Ness Feldman Community Attributes Inc. Fehr and Peers AECOM Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction & Vision 1-7 Chapter 2: Goals, Policies & Strategies 2-19 Chapter 3: Economic Development 3-37 Chapter 4: Land Use 4-55 Chapter 5: Transportation 5-69 Chapter 6: Housing 6-95 Chapter 7: Capital Facilities & Public Services 7-111 Chapter 8: Public & Private Utilities 8-133 Chapter 9: Parks, Recreation, & Open Space 9-143 Chapter 10: Natural Resources 10-151 Table of Maps Figure 1: Spokane Valley and the Greater-Spokane Region 1-8 Figure 12: Retail Land Use Concentrations & Trade Areas 3-49 Figure 14: Community Assets and Tourism Opportunities 3-51 Figure 16: Future Land Use Map 4-62 Figure 19: Employment Density vs. Housing Density 5-73 Figure 20: Where Spokane Valley Employees Live 5-74 Figure 21: Where Spokane Valley Residents Go to Work 5-75 Figure 24: Spokane Valley’s Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • Spokane County Regional Trails Plan
    Spokane County Regional Trails Plan A collaborative effort between the: Inland Northwest Trails Coalition Spokane County Department of Parks Recreation and Golf Spokane County Department of Building and Planning National Park Service, Rivers and Trails Program Table of Contents I. Acknowledgements............................................................................. 4 II. Introduction.......................................................................................... 5 Purpose of the Inland Northwest Trails Coalition ............................. 6 The Regional Approach .................................................................... 6 Planning Process and Public Participation ...................................... 7 III. Planning Framework ........................................................................... 8 GMA Requirements .......................................................................... 8 County Wide Planning Policies......................................................... 8 IV. Existing Trails ...................................................................................... 9 Existing Trail Inventory Map ........................................................... 10 Existing Hiking, Mountain Biking and Equestrian Trails ................. 11 Existing Bicycle/Pedestrian Trails and Facilities ............................ 14 V. Inventory of Current Plans for Trails and Bikeways ...................... 17 A. Spokane County Parks Plan ................................................... 17 B. Spokane
    [Show full text]
  • Streamflow Trends in the Spokane River and Tributaries, Spokane Valley/Rathdrum Prairie, Idaho and Washington
    Section Heading 1 ����������������������������������������������������������������������������� �������������������������������������� ��������������������������������������� �������������������������������������������������� �������������������� ����������������������������������������� ������������������������������� ���������������������� Streamflow Trends in the Spokane River and Tributaries, Spokane Valley/Rathdrum Prairie, Idaho and Washington By Jon E. Hortness and John J. Covert Prepared in cooperation with the Idaho Department of Water Resources and the Washington State Department of Ecology Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5005 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2005 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Hortness, J.E., and Covert, J.J., 2005, Streamflow trends in the Spokane River and tributaries, Spokane Valley/ Rathdrum Prairie,
    [Show full text]